<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-10-2045-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Tectonic processes, variations in sediment flux, and eustatic<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> sea level
recorded by the 20 Myr old Burdigalian transgression<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in the Swiss Molasse
basin</article-title><alt-title>The Burdigalian transgression in the Swiss Molasse basin</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The Burdigalian transgression in the Swiss Molasse basin}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P. Garefalakis and F. Schlunegger}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Garefalakis</surname><given-names>Philippos</given-names></name>
          <email>philippos.garefalakis@geo.unibe.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6171-1258</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Schlunegger</surname><given-names>Fritz</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2955-4440</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, 3012,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Philippos Garefalakis (philippos.garefalakis@geo.unibe.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2045</fpage><lpage>2072</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e90">The stratigraphic architecture of the Swiss Molasse basin, situated on the
northern side of the evolving Alps, reveals crucial information about the
basin's geometry, its evolution, and the processes leading to the deposition
of the siliciclastic sediments. Nevertheless, the formation of the Upper
Marine Molasse (OMM) and the controls on the related Burdigalian
transgression have still been a matter of scientific debate. During the time
period from ca. 20 to 17 Ma, the Swiss Molasse basin was partly flooded by a
shallow marine sea striking SW–NE. Previous studies have proposed that
the transgression occurred in response to a rise in global sea level,
a reduction of sediment flux, or an increase in tectonically controlled
accommodation space. Here, we readdress this problem and extract
stratigraphic signals from the Burdigalian molasse deposits that can be
related to changes in sediment supply rate, variations in the eustatic sea
level, and subduction tectonics. To achieve this goal, we conducted
sedimentological and stratigraphic analyses of several sites across the
entire Swiss Molasse basin.</p>
    <p id="d1e93">Field investigations show that the transgression and the subsequent
evolution of the Burdigalian seaway was characterized by (i) a deepening and
widening of the basin, (ii) phases of erosion and non-deposition during Lower Freshwater Molasse (USM),
OMM, and Upper Freshwater Molasse (OSM) times, and (iii) changes in along-strike drainage reversals. We
use these changes in the stratigraphic record to disentangle
tectonic and surface controls on the facies evolution at various scales. As
the most important mechanism, rollback subduction of the European mantle
lithosphere most likely caused a further downwarping of the foreland plate,
which we use to explain the deepening and widening of the Molasse basin,
particularly at distal sites. In addition, subduction tectonics also caused
the uplift of the Aar massif. This process was likely to have shifted the
patterns of surface loads, thereby resulting in a buckling of the foreland
plate and influencing the water depths in the basin. We use this mechanism
to explain the establishment of distinct depositional settings,
particularly the formation of subtidal shoals wherein a bulge in relation to
this buckling is expected. The rise of the Aar massif also resulted in a
reorganization of the drainage network in the Alpine hinterland, with the
consequence that the sediment flux to the basin decreased. We consider
this reduction in sediment supply to have amplified the tectonically controlled deepening of the Molasse basin. Because the marine conditions
were generally very shallow, subtle changes in eustatic sea level
contributed to the formation of several hiatuses that chronicle periods of
erosion and non-sedimentation. These processes also amplified the
tectonically induced increase in accommodation space during times of global
sea level highstands. Whereas these mechanisms are capable of explaining the
establishment of the Burdigalian seaway and the formation of distinct
sedimentological niches in the Swiss Molasse basin, the drainage reversal
during OMM times possibly requires a change in tectonic processes at the
slab scale, most likely including the entire Alpine range between the Eastern
and Central Alps.</p>
    <p id="d1e96">In conclusion, we consider rollback tectonics to be the main driving force
controlling the transgression of the OMM in Switzerland, with contributions
by the uplift of individual crustal blocks (here the Aar massif) and by a reduction of sediment supply. This reduction of sediment flux was likely to have been controlled by
tectonic processes as well when basement blocks became uplifted, thereby
modifying the catchment geometries. Eustatic changes in sea level<?pagebreak page2046?> explain
the various hiatuses and amplified the deepening of the basin during
eustatic highstand conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e108">Foreland basins and their deposits have often been used to explore the
tectonic evolution of their hinterlands, mainly because these basins are
mechanically coupled with the adjacent mountain belts (Beaumont, 1981;
Jordan, 1981; DeCelles, 2004). The formation of these foreland basins occurs
through the flexural downwarping of the underlying lithosphere in response
to loading, which results in the formation of a wedge-shaped trough where
sediment accumulates (DeCelles and Giles, 1996; Allen and Allen, 2005). The
shape of the foreland trough depends on the mechanical properties of the
foreland plate (Sinclair et al., 1991; Flemings and Jordan, 1990; Jordan and
Flemings, 1991), the load of the sedimentary fill itself (Flemings and
Jordan, 1990; Jordan and Flemings, 1991), and predominantly the tectonic
and geodynamic processes leading to changes in plate loading (Beaumont,
1981; Jordan, 1981; Allen et al., 1991; Sinclair et al., 1991; DeCelles and
Gilles, 1996). Additionally, a foreland basin can either be occupied by a
peripheral sea when sediment flux is lower than the formation rate of
accommodation space or by a fluvial system if the opposite is the case
(Sinclair and Allen, 1992). A shift from terrestrial to marine conditions,
for instance, can occur through a reduction in sediment flux, an increase in
tectonically controlled subsidence rate (Sinclair et al., 1991), or a rise
in the eustatic sea level (Reichenbacher et al., 2013). This has
particularly been inferred for the North Alpine Foreland Basin, or the
Molasse basin, situated on the northern side of the European Alps (Fig. 1a),
which experienced a change from terrestrial to marine conditions during
Burdigalian times ca. 20 Myr ago (e.g. Matter et al., 1980; Pfiffner, 1986;
Schlunegger et al., 1997a; Kempf et al., 1999; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002;
Ortner et al., 2011). In the Swiss part, this transgression resulted in the
establishment of a shallow marine seaway, linking the Paratethys in the NE
with the Tethys in the SW (Allen et al., 1985), and it is recorded by the
deposition of the Upper Marine Molasse group (OMM; Matter et al., 1980;
P. A. Allen, 1984). Although the history and geometry of the Burdigalian
seaway and the related sedimentary processes are well known through detailed
sedimentological and chronological investigations (e.g. Lemcke et al., 1953;
P. A. Allen, 1984; Allen et al., 1985; Homewood et al., 1986; Doppler, 1989;
Keller, 1989; Jin et al., 1995; Salvermoser, 1999; Strunck and Matter, 2002;
Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002; Reichenbacher et al., 2013), the controls on this
transgression have still been a matter of ongoing scientific debate.
Previous authors (e.g. Allen et al., 1985; Homewood et al., 1986; Keller,
1989; Strunck and Matter, 2002; Reichenbacher et al., 2013) proposed a
combination of a reduced sediment flux and a rise in global sea level as
possible mechanisms. However, thermo-chronometric data from the core of the
Alps (Lepontine dome, Fig. 1; Boston et al., 2017) and structural work in
the external Aar massif (Fig. 1; Herwegh et al., 2017) revealed that the
Burdigalian was also the time of major tectonic events, including thrusting
in the Aar massif and tectonic exhumation of the Lepontine dome (Schmid et
al., 1996), leading to changes in surface loads in the Alps. Accordingly, it
was proposed that tectonic processes could also have controlled the
transgression of the peripheral sea through downwarping of the foreland
plate (Sinclair et al., 1991). It is possible that the Swiss part of the
Molasse basin bears key information to differentiate between these
underlying mechanisms (eustasy, sediment flux, tectonics) because it is
situated to the north of the Aar massif and the Lepontine dome (Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e113"><bold>(a)</bold> Simplified geological map of the European Alps based
on a compilation by Kissling and Schlunegger (2018) and updated using
additional information from Handy et al. (2015) and Pippèrr and
Reichenbacher (2017); note the location of Fig. 2a and trace of <bold>(b)</bold>.
<bold>(b)</bold> Simplified geological–geophysical section through the Central
European Alps adapted from Kissling and Schlunegger (2018).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e130">The aim of this paper is to disentangle tectonic processes, a
reduction of sediment flux, and changes in the eustatic sea level as controls
on the transgression of the OMM in the Swiss Molasse. We analysed OMM
outcrops and sections along the entire Swiss Molasse basin at both proximal
and distal positions relative to the Alpine front (Fig. 1a). To this extent,
we measured palaeo-flow directions, and we explored the OMM deposits for
their sedimentary facies and related depositional settings. We also
determined the thickness and grain size of sedimentary bedforms, and we
applied hydrological concepts to calculate palaeo-water depths based on the
measured parameters. However, a chronological framework is absolutely
required for correlating sections across a basin where facies relationships
are strongly heterochronous, as is the case for the Swiss Molasse basin
(Matter et al., 1980). Therefore, we also reassessed the temporal framework
of the analysed sections through a compilation of previously published
magnetostratigraphic and biostratigraphic data, and we correlated the
individual sections across the basin.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Geological setting</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The architecture and evolution of the Alps</title>
      <p id="d1e148">The doubly vergent Alpine orogen (Fig. 1) is the consequence of the late
Cretaceous to present continent–continent collision between the European and
Adriatic plates (Schmid et al., 1996; Handy et al., 2010). It is comprised of a
double vergent nappe stack wherein the material on the northern side was
derived from the European and Adriatic plates, while the rocks on the
southern side is only of Adriatic provenance. In the centre, the Alps expose
a crystalline core of European origin referred to as the Lepontine dome and
the external massifs (Fig. 1; e.g. Aar massif; Spicher, 1980). At deeper
crustal levels, the Alpine orogen is underlain by a thick crustal root made
up of a stack of lower crustal material derived from the European
continental plate (Fry et al., 2010; Fig. 1b). Beneath the core of the
orogen, the ca. 160 km long (Lippitsch et al., 2003) lithospheric mantle slab
of the European continental plate bends and thus downwarps the foreland
plate towards the SE (Fig. 1b). This bending was mainly driven by slab load
due to the relatively large density of the subducted lithospheric mantle in
comparison with the surrounding asthenosphere as seismo-tomography data
reveal (Lippitsch et al., 2003). On the northern side of the Alps, the
structurally highest unit is made up of Austroalpine nappes that
structurally overlie the Penninicum, which in turn are underlain by the
Helvetic thrust nappes (Fig. 1a). The front of the Helvetic and Penninicum
units is referred to as the basal Alpine<?pagebreak page2048?> thrust (Fig. 1b). On the southern
side, the Alps are made up of the south alpine thrust sheets that consist of
crystalline basement rocks and sedimentary units of African origin. This
fold-and-thrust belt is bordered to the south by the Po basin (Fig. 1a). The
northern side of the Alps are separated from the southern side by the
north-dipping Periadriatic line that accommodated most of the shortening
during the Oligocene and the early Miocene by backthrusting and
right-lateral slip (Schmid et al., 1996).</p>
      <p id="d1e151">Recently, slab load has been considered the major driving force of the
subduction history of the European plate and for the exhumation of
crystalline rocks (Kissling and Schlunegger, 2018). This also concerns the
exhumation of the Lepontine dome (Fig. 1), where normal faulting along the
Simplon detachment fault resulted in rapid tectonic exhumation of the dome
between late Oligocene and early Miocene times with a peak recorded by
thermo-chronometric data at 20 Ma (Fig. 1b; Hurford, 1986; Mancktelow, 1985;
Mancktelow and Grasemann, 1997; Schlunegger and Willett, 1999; Boston et
al., 2017). This was also the time when the Aar massif, situated on the
European continental plate (Fig. 1b), experienced a period of rapid vertical
extrusion (Herwegh et al., 2017). Herwegh et al. (2017) and Kissling and
Schlunegger (2018) proposed a mechanism referred to as rollback subduction
to explain these observations. According to these authors, delamination of
crustal material from the European mantle lithosphere along the Moho
resulted in a stacking of buoyant lower crustal rocks beneath the Lepontine
dome and the Aar massif, forming the crustal root (Fry et al., 2010;
Fig. 1b). These processes are considered to have maintained isostatic
equilibrium between the subducted lithospheric mantle and the crust and thus
the elevated topography (Schlunegger and Kissling, 2015). Additionally, they
most likely balanced, through the stacking of the crustal root (Fry et al.,
2010, Fig. 1b), the rapid removal of upper crustal material in the Lepontine
dome at ca. 20 Ma (Schlunegger and Willet, 1999; Boston et al., 2017).
Delamination of crustal material has also been invoked to explain the
contemporaneous rapid exhumation and northward thrusting of the Aar massif
along steeply dipping thrusts (Herwegh et al., 2017). These processes were
contemporaneous with (i) the reorganization of the drainage network of the
Central Alps (Kuhlemann et al., 2001a; Schlunegger et al., 1998), (ii) the
decrease in sediment flux to the basin, as revealed by sediment budgets
(Kuhlemann, 2000; Kuhlemann et al., 2001a, b), and (iii) the Burdigalian
transgression in the Swiss part of the Molasse basin. We will thus refer to
these processes when discussing the controls on the Burdigalian
transgression within a geodynamic framework.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>The architecture and evolution of the Molasse basin</title>
      <p id="d1e162">The Molasse basin is approximately 700 km long and striking ENE–WSW from
France to Austria, where it broadens from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km to a maximum width
of ca. 150 km (Pfiffner, 1986; Fig. 1a). It is limited to the north by the
Jura Mountains, the Black Forest, and Bohemian massifs, as well as to the south
by the basal Alpine thrust (Homewood et al., 1986).</p>
      <p id="d1e175">Reconstructions of the evolution of the Molasse basin (Fig. 2a) have been
the focus of many research articles over the past years (e.g. Matter et al.,
1980; Homewood and Allen, 1981; P. A. Allen, 1984; Keller, 1989; Schlunegger
et al., 1996; Sinclair, 1997; Kempf et al., 1999; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002;
Ortner et al., 2011; Reichenbacher et al., 2013). This has resulted in the
general notion that the large-scale subsidence history of the Molasse basin
was closely linked with the geodynamic evolution of the Alps (Sinclair et
al., 1991; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002; Pfiffner et al., 2002; Ortner et al.,
2011; Schlunegger and Kissling, 2015). The development of this basin as a
foreland trough has been considered to commence with the closure of the
Alpine Tethys in late Cretaceous times (Lihou and Allen, 1996; Schmid et
al., 1996). This was the time when subduction of the European oceanic
lithosphere with a large density beneath the Adriatic continental plate
started. Large slab load forces resulted in a downwarping of the European
foreland plate and the formation of a deep marine trough (Schmid et al.,
1996), where sedimentation occurred by turbidites (Sinclair, 1997) on
submarine fans (Allen et al., 1991; Sinclair, 1997; Lu et al., 2018;
Reichenwallner, 2019). This first period of basin evolution has been
referred to as the flysch stage in the literature (Fig. 2b; Sinclair and
Allen, 1992). The situation changed at 35–32 Ma when the buoyant
continental lithosphere of the European plate started to enter the
subduction channel. Strong tension forces started to operate at the
stretched margin of the European continental crust, particularly beneath the
Central Alps (Schmid et al., 1996), with the result that the subducted
oceanic lithosphere of the European plate broke off (Davies and von
Blanckenburg, 1995). The consequence was a rebound of the European plate, a
rise of the Central Swiss Alps, and an increase in sediment flux to the Swiss
Molasse basin (Sinclair, 1997; Kuhlemann et al., 2001a, b; Willett,
2010; Garefalakis and Schlunegger, 2018), which became overfilled at
ca. 30 Ma (Sinclair and Allen, 1992; Sinclair, 1997). The subsequent post-30 Ma stage of basin evolution has been referred to as the Molasse stage
(Sinclair and Allen, 1992).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e180"> </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f02-part01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e192"><bold>(a)</bold> Detailed geological map of the area between Geneva and
Zurich adapted from Kissling and Schlunegger (2018) showing the locations of
data points referred to in this paper. The OMM deposits at sites 1 to 16
have been mapped at the scale of 1 : 25 000, which was used to reproduce
Fig. 6. In addition, the observations of the sections, outcrops, and
drill core at sites 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 13, and 16 are explicitly described in
Sects. 4 and 5 of this paper. Please refer to Fig. 1 for the complete
legend. <bold>(b)</bold> Lithostratigraphic scheme of the Molasse deposits in
Switzerland. Modified after Keller (1989).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f02-part02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e206">Molasse sedimentation occurred from ca. 30 Ma onward and was recorded by two
large-scale, transgressive–regressive mega-sequences (Fig. 2b; e.g.
Sinclair, 1997; Kempf et al., 1997, 1999; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002;
Cederbom et al., 2004, 2011). These two mega-sequences consist of four
lithostratigraphic groups. The first mega-sequence comprises the Lower
Marine Molasse (UMM; Diem, 1986) and the Lower Freshwater Molasse (USM;
Platt and Keller, 1992), and the second mega-sequence consists of the Upper
Marine Molasse (OMM; Homewood et al., 1986) and the Upper Freshwater Molasse
(OSM; Matter et al., 1980). Sedimentation in the Molasse basin continued up
to ca. 10–5 Ma, when a phase of uplift during Pliocene times<?pagebreak page2049?> resulted in
erosion and recycling of the previously deposited Molasse units (Mazurek et
al., 2006; Cederbom et al., 2004, 2011). This erosion reached deeper
stratigraphic levels in the western part of the Molasse basin than in the
eastern segment (Baran et al., 2014) with the consequence that the OMM
deposits are only fragmentarily preserved in the west (Fig. 2a).</p>
      <p id="d1e209">Sediment dispersal changed during the Molasse stage of basin evolution.
Prior to 20 Ma, during USM times, measurements of sediment transport
directions (Kempf, 1998; Kempf et al., 1999) and sediment provenance
analysis (Füchtbauer, 1964) revealed that the sedimentary material was
transported to the east by braided to meandering streams. At that time, a
coastline was situated near Munich, separating a deep marine trough farther
east from a terrestrial environment to the west of Munich (Kuhlemann and
Kempf, 2002). During OMM times, heavy mineral assemblages reveal that the
Swiss Molasse basin operated as a closed sedimentary trough, where all
supplied material was locally stored (Allen et al., 1985). During OSM times,
from ca. 16.5 to 5 Ma, heavy mineral data imply that material with sources in
the Hercynian basement north of Munich or the Bohemian massif was supplied
to the Swiss Molasse (“Graupensandrinne”; Allen et al., 1985; Berger,
1996), suggesting that material transport occurred towards the west
(Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002). The details of the reversal of the drainage
direction have not yet been elaborated, and related scenarios lack a
database with<?pagebreak page2050?> palaeo-flow information, particularly for the OMM. The
establishment of such a database, particularly the assignment of a more
precise age to the drainage reversal, will be part of the scope of this
article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>The Upper Marine Molasse</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Lithostratigraphic and sedimentological framework</title>
      <p id="d1e227">The Upper Marine Molasse (OMM) deposits, which are the focus of this study,
mainly consist of a suite of shallow marine sandstones and mudstones that
were deposited between ca. 20 and 17 Ma (Fig. 2b) in a ca. 70–80 km wide
seaway (Allen and Homewood, 1984; Allen et al., 1985; Keller, 1989; Strunck
and Matter, 2002). Close to the Alpine thrust front, the OMM successions are
up to 900 m thick and thin to a few tens of metres towards the distal basin
margin farther northwest.</p>
      <p id="d1e230">Large streams with sources in the Central Alps supplied their material to
the Molasse basin, thereby forming megafans and conglomerate deposits with
diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 km that interfingered with the sea (Schlunegger et
al., 1996; Kempf et al., 1999). Consequently, the facies relationships were
strongly heterochronous across the basin, and terrestrial deposits,
preserved as conglomerates of the OSM according to Matter (1964), grade into
marine sediments of the OMM (Keller, 1989) over a lateral distance of a few
tens of kilometres. This is also the case in the study area, where thick
conglomerate packages situated at the Alpine thrust front ca. 50 km to the NE
of the Aar massif (Napf conglomerates; Matter, 1964; Haldemann et al., 1980)
separate the basin into southeastern and northwestern segments with
different lithostratigraphic schemes (Fig. 3a). For simplicity purposes,
these areas will be referred to as the eastern and western segments in
relation to the Napf. East of the Napf conglomerates, in the following text
denoted as the Napf units (Matter, 1964), the OMM has been grouped in two
transgressive–regressive packages referred to as the Lucerne and the
St. Gallen formations (Keller, 1989). Both units comprise a suite of
sandstones with mudstone interbeds. They are separated from each other by a
metre-thick palaeosol (Schlunegger et al., 2016). We will refer to these units
as the OMM-I (Lucerne Fm) and the OMM-II (St. Gallen Fm), respectively
(Fig. 3a). Keller (1989) additionally categorized the OMM-I east of the
Napf units into a lower wave-dominated unit and an upper unit where tidal
processes are recorded, which we refer to as the OMM-Ia and OMM-Ib,
respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e242"> </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f03-part01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e254"><bold>(a)</bold> Lithostratigraphic scheme of the OMM in Switzerland.
<bold>(b)</bold> Composite stratigraphic columns illustrating sedimentary
architectures at the proximal basin border in the western Molasse basin
(proximal west), in the central part of the Molasse basin (Napf units), and
in the eastern basin (proximal east). The composite section for the proximal
western basin is based on data from the Mt. Vully and Heitenried sections,
drillings, and from surface information from the Sense section (Sense beds
and Kalchstätten Formation) (Strunck and Matter, 2002). The composite
section representative of the central part of the Molasse basin (Napf) is
mainly based on the sedimentary logs by Schlunegger et al. (1996; see their
Schwändigraben and Fontannen sections) complemented with information
from the geological map of the region (Schlunegger et al., 2016). Note that
Kälin and Kempf (2009) proposed a very short hiatus recorded by
magnetozone R3 within the Napf units, which we do not discuss in detail for
simplicity purposes. The composite section illustrating the situation at the
proximal basin border east of the Napf represents the sedimentary
architecture as far east as Lake Zurich (Fig. 2a). It is based on data
from Keller (1989, see his Rümlig, Ränggloch, and Lucerne sections)
and from Schlunegger et al. (1996, see their Fischenbach section) and
geological maps of the region (Wolhusen; Isler and Murer, 2019). Note that
the Entlen section is situated immediately east of the Napf (Fig. 5a) where
the lowermost part (Lucerne Formation) can be characterized by the composite
section of the proximal east. Detailed sedimentological data of the
Sense Formation and the Lucerne Formation are shown in Fig. 4. Note that the
Molasse units shown in capitals (i.e. USM, OMM, and OSM) are based on the
lithological architecture and thus on facies associations identified in the
field.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=460.934646pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f03-part02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e268">West of the Napf, the OMM at the proximal basin border has also been
categorized in two units (Fig. 3a) but with a different scheme and different
names. These are the Sense Formation at the base (suite of sandstones with
mudstone interbeds) and the Kalchstätten Formation at the top
(alternation of sandstones and mudstones). Further up-section, these marine
deposits (Strunck and Matter, 2002) grade into the fluvial conglomerates of
the Guggershorn Formation and thus into the OSM (Strunck and Matter, 2002)
(Fig. 3a). Magnetostratigraphic dating showed that the accumulation of the
Guggershorn Formation occurred contemporaneously with marine (OMM)
sedimentation at more distal sites. These conglomerates thus represent the
deposits of a braided stream that shed its material to the OMM sea, similar
to the Napf conglomerates.</p>
      <p id="d1e271">In the central basin near Fribourg (Fig. 2a), also on the western side of
the Napf, sedimentological investigations of sand waves (Homewood and Allen,
1981; Homewood et al., 1986) disclosed the occurrence of tidal bundles and a
bidirectional dispersal of sedimentary material. These deposits have been
assigned to a subtidal environment (Homewood<?pagebreak page2051?> and Allen, 1981) where material
with sources in the Central Alps was redistributed in the basin by strong
tidal currents that entered the basin from the Tethys in the south and the
Paratethys in the northeast (Allen et al., 1985; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002;
Bieg et al., 2008). Lithostratigraphic correlations suggest that the
deposits at Fribourg most likely correspond to the lower Sense Fm (Python,
1996) and thus to the OMM-Ia (see the Discussion section and Fig. 3a).</p>
      <p id="d1e274">In the basin axis, between the Lake Neuchâtel and Wohlen areas
(Fig. 2a), coarse-grained sandstones with large-scale cross-beds in which
individual grains are larger than 2 mm have been interpreted as subtidal
sand waves (Allen and Homewood, 1984; Allen et al., 1985). These deposits are
calcareous sandstones with shelly fragments, referred to as the
“Muschelsandstein” (Allen and Homewood, 1984; Allen et al., 1985,
Fig. 3a). Alternatively, they occur as coarse-grained cross-bedded
sandstones with large lithoclasts, also called the “Grobsandstein” (Jost
et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Chronostratigraphic framework</title>
      <p id="d1e285">Ages for the OMM deposits have been established by multiple authors through
palaeontological analyses of mammalian fragments and teeth (Keller, 1989;
Schlunegger et al., 1996; Kempf et al., 1999) as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
chemo-stratigraphy (Keller, 1989). The latter yield a numerical age between
ca. 18.5 and 17 Ma, particularly for the OMM-II on the eastern side of the
Napf. Subsequent magneto-polarity chronologies (Schlunegger et al., 1996;
Strunck and Matter, 2002) paired with further micro-mammalian discoveries
(Kempf et al., 1997; Kempf, 1998; Kälin and Kempf, 2009; Jost et al.,
2016) allowed for an update of the chronological framework (Fig. 3b) of Keller (1989) through correlations with the magneto-polarity timescale (MPTS) of
Cande and Kent (1992, 1995) and the most recent astronomically tuned Neogene
timescale (ATNTS; Lourens et al., 2004). This yielded the notion that
the transgression of the peripheral sea and the deposition of the OMM
started at ca. 20 Ma and was synchronous, within uncertainties, across the
entire Swiss Molasse basin (Strunck and Matter, 2002). However, a temporal
correlation of sections across the Napf, i.e. between eastern and western
Switzerland (Fig. 3a), and a harmonization of the stratigraphic schemes
(Fig. 3b) have not been achieved yet. This will be accomplished in this
paper, and it will build the temporal framework for the discussion of the
development of the basin.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Location of sections and available database</title>
      <?pagebreak page2053?><p id="d1e324">Following the scope of the paper, we established the facies relationships
and sediment transport patterns during the transgressive phase of the OMM
and thus mainly focused on the OMM-I. We proceeded through sedimentological
investigations of key sites (Fig. 2a), which expose the related succession
in proximal (Entlen section east of the Napf units; Sense section west of
the Napf units), central (St. Magdalena site, Gurten drill core), and
distal positions (Lake Neuchâtel and Wohlen areas). The lithofacies in
the Entlen and Sense sections was investigated in the field at the scale of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At each outcrop along these sections, data were collected as notes in
the field book and hand drawings on digital photos (available from the
senior author upon request). The results are then presented as logs in
Fig. 4 and in Tables 1 and 2. The St. Magdalena site and the Lake
Neuchâtel and Wohlen areas only display outcrops rather than sections.
Therefore, the sediments at these locations have been sketched in the field
and on digital photos, thereby paying special attention to collecting
information about the orientation and thickness of cross-beds. The
sedimentary material of the ca. 200 m deep Gurten drill core is not
available. However, the sediments were photographed at high resolution at
the University of Bern in 1989 (see Fig. S3 in the Supplement). We used these
photos to extract information on the lithofacies association encountered in
the drilling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e341">Sedimentological logs of <bold>(a)</bold> the Entlen and
<bold>(b)</bold> the Sense section. See Fig. 2a for the locations of sections, Fig. 5
for the chronological framework of the deposits, and the tables for further
sedimentological details, abbreviations of the lithofacies, and
references to sedimentological work. The block diagrams illustrate the
palaeogeographical conditions from a conceptual point of view. Note that
the palaeo-bathymetric values are minimum estimates and that the mean water
depths have been inferred from the assignment of lithofacies to a
depositional setting. This might explain why the numerical values for water
depths based on cross-bed thicknesses and our inferred mean water depth
estimates deviate between ca. 200  and 250 m of the Sense section.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e359">Lithofacies encountered in the Entlen section.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Facies<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>assemblages</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Structures and bedforms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depositional setting and references</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mcl, Mm,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Mp, Mfl,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Mle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Climbing ripples (Mcl) within parallel-laminated (Mp) and massive-bedded mudstones (Mm); root casts and mottling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wave-dominated environment: backshore setting in which sediments were deposited within a swampy area. Root casts, reddish mottling, and caliche nodules represent palaeosol formation. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Keller (1989), Miall (1996), Daidu et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Md, Mfl,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Mle,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mudstone drapes (Md), flaser (Mfl) and lenticular bedding (Mle)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wave-dominated environment with strong tidal influence: backshore to nearshore setting in which Mle mostly forms in the upper intertidal to supratidal (mudflat) and Mfl forms in the intertidal (sand flat) or alternatively in the subtidal if ripple crests are fully preserved. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Keller (1989), Shanmugam (2003), Daidu et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Scr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Trough and tabular cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) superimposed by current ripple marks (Scr), which record an opposite flow direction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wave-dominated environment with strong tidal influence: nearshore setting, deposits of (subtidal) sand dunes and sand waves. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baas (1978), Allen and Homewood (1984), Jost et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sg, Shf, Sm, Sp, Sv</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pebbly lags (Sg), shell fragments (Shf) within massive- to parallel-laminated sandstones (Sm, Sp), occasionally with sand volcanoes (Sv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wave-dominated environment: foreshore to nearshore setting within the beach area, deposited in the surf-and-swash zone. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Allen et al. (1985), Dam and Andreasen (1990), Keller (1990), Miall (1996), Jost et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sbr, Scr, Sos, Sc, Sm, Sp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ripple marks (Sbr, Scr, Sos) and cross-beds (Sc) within massive-bedded and parallel-laminated sandstones (Sm, Sp)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wave-dominated environment: nearshore to foreshore setting in which ripple marks form beneath waves, while Sp form in the surf-and-swash zone (beach area). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baas (1978), Reineck and Singh (1980), Clifton and Dingler (1984), J. R. L. Allen (1984), Keller (1989, 1990)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spw, Sc, Sos, Sm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sandstone beds with a planar base and a wavy top (Spw), internally cross-bedded (Sc), superimposed by oscillation ripple marks (Sos) within massive-bedded sandstones (Sm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wave-dominated environment: nearshore to offshore setting, high-energetic storm deposits (tempestites). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>J. R. L. Allen (1982, 1984), Clifton and Dingler (1984), Miller and Komar (1980a, b), Diem (1986), Rust and Gibling (1990)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e526">Lithofacies encountered in the Napf units.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Facies<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>assemblages</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Structures and bedforms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depositional setting and references</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gc, Gm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cross- (Gc) and massive-bedded (Gm) conglomerates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fluvial-dominated environment: megafan deposits within a braided river system. Gm and Gc form in active channels. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Platt and Keller (1992), Schlunegger et al. (1997a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sc, Sm, Mp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cross- (Sc) and massive-bedded (Sm) sandstones with parallel-laminated mudstones (Mp)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fluvial-dominated environment: megafan deposits within a braided river system. Sc and Sm from crevasse splay deposits. Mp facies (often yellowish–reddish mottled with caliche nodules and root casts) is evident for palaeosol genesis on a floodplain. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>J. R. L. Allen (1982, 1984), Rust and Gibling (1990), Dam and Andreasen (1990), Keller (1990)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Reconstruction of sedimentary architecture</title>
      <p id="d1e596">The lithofacies have been identified (e.g. Schaad et al., 1992; Keller,
1989) based on the assemblage of sedimentary characteristics, including
grain size, thickness, lateral extent if applicable, sedimentary structures,
basal contact, colour, and fossil content (Tables 1 to 5). The lithofacies
types correspond to individual bedforms (see Tables 1 to 5 for references),
which bear information on flow strengths, flow directions, sediment supply,
and water depths (e.g. Keller, 1989). The combination of these parameters,
usually recorded by distinct assemblages of lithofacies types, can be used
to identify distinct sedimentary settings. Related concepts of facies
analysis have been documented for fluvial deposits (Miall, 1978, 1985, 1996;
Platt and Keller, 1992) but are less standardized for shallow marine
deposits. Here, we followed Keller (1989) and Schaad et al. (1992), who
developed a concept for shallow marine deposits whereby lithofacies types are
grouped into facies assemblages in a hierarchic order, based on which
distinct shallow marine settings can be interpreted. We followed these
authors and assembled the various lithofacies types into five depositional
settings, which are from land to sea: terrestrial, backshore, foreshore,
nearshore, and offshore. We then mapped the depositional settings at the
scale of 1 : 25 000 at various sites across the Swiss Molasse basin where
suitable outcrops were present (see Fig. 2a for visited sites).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Determination of sediment transport directions</title>
      <p id="d1e607">Sediment transport directions were determined from orientations of clast
imbrications, gutter casts, and dip directions of cross-beds. In addition,
the orientation of the coastline can be inferred from sediment transport
within the surf-and-swash zone at the wet beach where rolling grains carve
millimetre-thin rills in the beach deposits, which are oriented perpendicular to the
coast. These rills are recorded by linear grooves, or parting lineations, on
the surface of sandstones (J. R. L. Allen, 1982; Hammer, 1984). We thus measured
the orientation of these features where visible. We also determined the
strike direction of oscillation ripple marks to infer the orientation of
waves and thus of the coastline.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Calculation of palaeo-water depths</title>
      <p id="d1e619">We analysed the sediments in the key sections according to their
palaeo-water depths. For oscillation ripple marks, the ripple metrics
(spacing between ripple crests and ripple heights) together with the grain
size can be used to infer water depths at the time the oscillation ripples
were formed (Diem, 1985; Allen et al., 1985; see the Supplement). We thus measured
the ripple metrics with a metre stick together with grain sizes in the field
and calculated the water depths following Allen (1997). Likewise, minimum
water depths can be inferred from the heights of cross-beds as examples from
modern streams have shown (Bridge and Tye, 2000; Leclair and Bridge, 2001).
Please refer to the Supplement for the deviation of the related equations.
Published information from deep drillings (Boswil 1; Hünenberg 1;
Schlunegger et al., 1997a) and seismostratigraphic data (line 8307,
Schlunegger et al., 1997a; line BEAGBE.N780025; Fig. S2 in the Supplement)
completed the available database.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Proximal basin border to the east of the Napf: Entlen section (site 13 in Fig. 2a)</title>
      <p id="d1e638">The sedimentary suite of the ca. 370 metre thick OMM-Ia at Entlen (Figs. 4a and
S4a in the Supplement) records a large diversity of lithofacies types
(Table 1). Parallel-laminated (Sp), fine- to medium-grained sandstone
packages are centimetres to decimetres thick and normally graded. These deposits alternate
with decimetre-thick low-angle cross-bedded units with tangential lower boundaries
(Sc, Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and layers with a massive structure (Sm). Gravel and pebble
layers (Sg) and shell fragments (Shf) are visible where sandstone units have
erosive bases. Current (Scr) and oscillation ripple marks (Sos), locally
with branching crests (Sbr), as well as flame fabrics or sand volcanoes (Sv)
are present only in some places. Fine-grained lithofacies include millimetre- to
centimetre-thick parallel-laminated to massive mudstone layers (Mp, Mm). Siltstone
climbing ripples (Mcl) are subordinate in the OMM-Ia suite. Mudstone drapes
(Md), a few millimetres thick, mostly occur on top of current ripple marks (Scr). In
places, root casts are associated with yellow to ochre mottled colours.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2056?><p id="d1e650">The overlying ca. 430 m thick OMM-Ib (Figs. 4a and S4a in the Supplement)
comprises fine- to medium-grained sandstone packages with mudstone interbeds
(Table 1). Low-angle trough (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) or tabular (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) cross-bedded
sandstone beds are several decimetres thick. The Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sandstones
contain current ripple marks (Scr) at their base, whereas laminae sets of
Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sandstones are interbedded with current ripples (Scr) recording
an opposing sediment transport direction. At one site, decimetre-thick sandstone beds
display a planar base and a wavy top with a wavelength of several metres
(Spw; Fig. 4a). Parallel-laminated (Sp) and massive-bedded (Sm) sandstone
beds are decimetres thick and mainly found at the top of the OMM-Ib unit. Mudstones
mostly occur as mudstone drapes (Md) on top of current ripple marks (Scr).
Lenticular and flaser interbeds (Mle, Mfl) are decimetres thick and characterized
by current ripple marks with truncated crests. The OMM-Ib then ends with a
metre-thick mudstone displaying yellow to reddish mottling, root casts, and
caliche nodules.</p>
      <p id="d1e689">Estimates of palaeo-water depths (see the Supplement) reveal that the OMM-Ia
sedimentary rocks were deposited in shallow conditions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m deep
(Fig. 4a and Table S2). At the base of the OMM-Ib palaeo-water depths were
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m and thus deeper compared to the OMM-Ia unit (see
the Supplement). The OMM-Ib then shallows towards the top.</p>
      <p id="d1e712">Measurements of the bedform orientations of the OMM-Ia deposits reveal sediment
transport directions between 315<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NW and 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> NE, with
a dominant NE-directed transport (Fig. 4a). During OMM-Ib times, transport
directions were bidirectional, and measurements reveal the full range
between 260<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (Fig. 4a). Dominant transport
directions of the OMM-Ib sediments change towards the N and to the W
up-section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Proximal basin border in the centre: Napf units (site 12 in Fig. 2a)</title>
      <p id="d1e759">The Napf units, which are a terrestrial interval of the OMM and the OSM
(Fig. 3; Schlunegger et al., 1996), are ca. 1550 m thick and include a
succession of conglomerates, sandstones, and mudstone interbeds (Matter,
1964), which we categorize into five lithofacies types (Table 2, Fig. S4d in
the Supplement). Individual conglomerate beds are up to 10 m thick and display
stacks of 2–3 m thick beds with massive- (Gm) to cross-bedded (Gc)
geometries. The sandstone beds occur as massive-bedded (Sm) and cross-bedded
(Sc) units. Interbedded mudstones are horizontally bedded (Mp) and have a
yellowish–reddish mottling, caliche nodules, and root casts. Palaeo-flow
measurements imply a change from a NE-directed transport during USM times to
a NW-directed sediment transport between OMM-I and OSM times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Proximal basin border to the west of the Napf: Sense section (site 7 in Fig. 2a)</title>
      <p id="d1e770">The OMM at Sense (Figs. 4b and S4b) starts with a ca. 200 m thick
succession of predominantly sandstones with some mudstone interbeds. Medium-
to coarse-grained sandstone beds, up to 2–3 m thick, are massive-bedded
(Sm), parallel-laminated (Sp), and trough cross-bedded (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Table 3).
They also occur as metre-scale tabular cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) forming several
metre-thick sigmoidal foresets (Sc) with top and bottom sets and pebbly lags
(Sg). These packages are well exposed along a nearby road-cut (Heitenried,
Fig. 2a; 46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; Fig. S4c in
the Supplement). Some of these Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cross-beds contain current ripple marks
(Scr), which are draped with a muddy layer (Md). Ripple marks also build up
tabular sandstone bodies. They are either asymmetric (Scr) or symmetric
(Sos) and may display branching crests (Sbr). In places, the sandstone
bodies are highly bioturbated (Sf). Mudstone interbeds are 10–20 cm
thick, massive- (Mm) to parallel-laminated (Mp), and strongly bioturbated
(Mf).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e864">Lithofacies encountered in the Sense section.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Facies<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>assemblages</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Structures and bedforms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depositional setting and references</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gm, Gc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Massive- to cross-bedded conglomerates (Gm, Gc)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fluvial-dominated environment: terrestrial setting in which coarse-grained rivers deposited material. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Platt and Keller (1992), Schlunegger et al. (1997a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sc, Sg, Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Sm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cross-bedded sandstones (Sc) with top sets, foresets, and bottom sets with pebbly lags (Sg), associated with trough cross- (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and massive-bedded sandstones (Sm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fluvial-dominated environment with tidal influence: foreshore setting in which deltas, or alternatively estuaries, enter the sea: Sc and Sg mark Gilbert delta-type deposits, while Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Sm mark mouth bar deposits (or alternatively sand dunes). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>J. R. L. Allen (1982, 1984), Allen and Homewood (1984), Rust and Gibling (1990), Dam and Andreasen (1990)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gm, Gc,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Mm, Sm,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Sg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Massive- to cross-bedded conglomerates (Gm, Gc) associated with massive-bedded sandstones and mudstones (Sm, Mm); occasionally, pebbles only occur as isolated layers within sandstones (Sg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment with fluvial influence (river inflow): nearshore setting. Terrestrial-derived material is washed into the subtidal setting by high-energetic floods. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Dam and Andreasen (1990), Platt and Keller (1992), Miall (1996), Schlunegger et al. (1997a)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mm, Mp, Mf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Massive-bedded (Mm) and parallel-laminated (Mp) mudstones with bioturbation (Mf)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: backshore setting, deposits of the supratidal (mudflat). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Dam and Andreasen (1990), Keller (1990), Miall (1996)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sm, Mm, Mf, Sf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Strongly bioturbated (Mf, Sf) massive-bedded mudstones and sandstones (Mm, Sm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: backshore to foreshore setting, deposits of mud (upper intertidal to supratidal) and sand flats (intertidal). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Dam and Andreasen (1990), Keller (1990), Miall (1996), Nichols (1999)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scr, Md,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Current ripples (Scr) and tabular cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) with mudstone drapes (Md), occasionally with heavily bioturbated sandstones (Sf)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: foreshore setting, deposits of the intertidal (sand flat), where bioturbation occurs (Sf). Mudstone drapes record slack-water phases. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baas (1978), Reineck and Singh (1980), Allen and Homewood (1984), Shanmugam (2003), Nichols (1999)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sc, Sce</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cross-bedded (Sc) sandstones, occasionally forming epsilon cross-beds (Sce)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: foreshore to nearshore setting, deposits of a (meandering) tidal channel. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>J. R. L. Allen (1982, 1984), Frieling et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sos, Sbr, Sp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oscillation (Sos) and branching ripple marks (Sbr) that grade into parallel-laminated sandstones (Sp)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment with strong wave influence: foreshore to nearshore setting, deposits of the beach area (surf-and-swash zone) and the wave transformation area. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Reineck and Singh (1980), Clifton and Dingler (1984), J. R. L. Allen (1984), Keller (1990)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scr,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Md, Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tabular (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and trough cross-bedded (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) sandstones, superimposed with current ripples (Scr) and mudstone drapes (Md), associated with massive-bedded sandstones (Sm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment with fluvial influence (river inflow): foreshore to nearshore environment. Estuaries (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scr, Md) entering the sea, building up mouth bar deposits or alternatively subtidal sand dunes (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sm). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Yalin (1964), Baas (1978), Allen and Homewood (1984), Dam and Andreasen (1990), Jost et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scr, Md</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Trough cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) superimposed by current ripple marks (Scr) and mudstone drapes (Md)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: nearshore setting, deposits of (subtidal) sand dunes and sand waves. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baas (1978), Allen and Homewood (1984), Shanmugam (2003), Jost et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spw, Sos, Sg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sandstone beds with a planar base and a wavy top (Spw), superimposed by oscillation ripple marks (Sos) and embedded with pebbles (Sg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment with wave influence:<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>nearshore to offshore setting, high-energetic storm deposits (tempestites). <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Reineck and Singh (1980), Miller and Komar (1980a, b),  Clifton and Dingler (1984), Diem (1986), Miall (1996)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1182">The first occurrence of 5–10 m thick sandstone beds at the 200 m
stratigraphic level (Fig. 4b) marks a distinct shift in the stratigraphic
record where several metre-thick cross-bedded sandstone beds dominate the
sedimentary succession. At this level, (i) 5–10 m thick normally graded
sandstone beds overlie an erosive base and display epsilon cross-beds (Sce);
(ii) cross-bedded sandstones (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are several metres thick and tens
of metres wide, and individual laminae sets are superimposed by current
ripples (Scr) with an opposite flow direction than the cross-beds
themselves; nearly all laminae sets of cross-beds (Sc) are superimposed by
mudstone drapes (Md); and (iii) medium-grained sandstones display
ridge-and-swale bedform geometries (Spw) with a small amplitude of a few
decimetres and a large wavelength of several metres. Some of these
Spw facies are occasionally covered with oscillation ripple marks (Sos). The
Sense section ends with an alternation of decimetre-thick mudstone beds (Mm) and
metre-thick massive- to cross-bedded conglomerates (Gm, Gc). These conglomerates
then evolve towards an amalgamation of several metre-thick, massive-, and
cross-bedded packages characterizing the uppermost ca. 50 m suite of the
Sense section (Fig. 4b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1195">Estimates of palaeo-water depths range between 5 and 10 m (Fig. 4b and
Table S4 in the Supplement) during the deposition of the lowermost 200 m.
Conditions were deepest at the 200 m stratigraphic level, reaching water
depths in the range of up to 30 m (see the Supplement). Measurements of sediment
transport directions cover the range between ca. 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (Fig. 4b) at the base of the Sense section, which then
changed to an axial, bipolar SW–NE-directed transport and to a W-directed
transport towards the end of the section (Fig. 4b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Central basin: St. Magdalena site and Gurten drill core (sites 4 and 9 in Fig. 2a)</title>
      <?pagebreak page2058?><p id="d1e1224">The sandstones within a cave system near Fribourg (St. Magdalena; Figs. 2a
and S4c in the Supplement) are medium- to coarse-grained and display an
amalgamation of up to 1–3 m wide cross-bedded troughs (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) with
current ripple marks (Scr) at their base. The cross-bedded troughs and the
ripple marks are both covered by mudstone drapes (Md). The amplitude of the
troughs is in the range of several decimetres, whereas the cross-sectional
widths span several decimetres to metres. The sandstones also occur as
massive-bedded units (Sm). They are occasionally interbedded with
current ripple marks (Scr) draped with mudstone layers (Md). Basal contacts
are erosive. Measurements of morphometric properties (St. Magdalena;
Fig. 2a) allow for an estimation of water depth, which is in the range of
ca. 3 and 5 m (Table S1 in the Supplement). Sediment transport directions
measured at the St. Magdalena site reveal a WSW–ESE-dominated sediment
transport.</p>
      <p id="d1e1236">In the nearby ca. 260 m deep Gurten (Fig. 2a) drill core (Fig. S3 in
the Supplement), OMM-Ia deposits occur as cross-bedded sandstones (Sc) topped
with mudstone drapes (Md). These lithofacies associations (Table 4) are most
abundant within the drill core and make up ca. 200 m of the log. However,
because drill cores offer limited information about the dimensions of the
encountered sediments, we were not able to determine if cross-beds can be
assigned to tabular beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) or to troughs (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1260">Lithofacies encountered at the St. Magdalena site and
Gurten drill core.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Facies<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>assemblages</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Structures and bedforms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depositional setting and references</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Scr, Sc, Sm Md</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Trough cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and cross-bedded sandstones (Sc) superimposed by current ripple marks (Scr) and mudstone drapes (Md), often associated with massive-bedded sandstones (Sm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: nearshore setting, deposits of (subtidal) sand dunes (or mouth bar deposits) and megaripples; we infer these deposits as sediments of subtidal shoals. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baas (1978), J. R. L. Allen (1982, 1984), Allen and Homewood (1984), Rust and Gibling (1990), Dam and Andreasen (1990), Shanmugam (2003)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Basin axis in the west and the east: Lake Neuch\^{a}tel and Wohlen areas (sites 2 and 16 in Fig.~2a)}?><title>Basin axis in the west and the east: Lake Neuchâtel and Wohlen areas (sites 2 and 16 in Fig. 2a)</title>
      <p id="d1e1336">Calcareous, shelly sandstones (Scc) occur in the basin axis and are an
assemblage of various lithofacies. This Scc facies association is made up of
5–10 m thick, coarse-grained sandstone beds with low-angle cross-beds
(Sc) that contain coquinas, shell fragments (Shf), and pebbles (Sg) in
places. Interbedded fine-grained sandstones contain current ripple marks
(Scr) recording an opposite flow direction relative to the cross-beds (Sc).</p>
      <p id="d1e1339">In the west (sites at Lake Neuchâtel area; Figs. 2a and S4c in
the Supplement), mapping shows that Scc Muschelsandstein deposits are ca. 5 m
thick and record NNE- to NE-directed sediment transport. Foreset thicknesses
of these deposits thin to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m towards the front of the
Napf megafan, where herringbone cross-beds imply SW- and NE-directed
bimodal sediment transport. At the NE margin of the Napf, these
Scc Muschelsandstein deposits grade into Slc Grobsandstein units,
which show metre-thick tabular cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) or decimetre-thick trough
cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) wherein individual troughs have metre-wide diameters.
Measurements of palaeo-flow directions reveal a SW- and SE-directed
transport. These deposits are either time-equivalent sediments of the
Scc Muschelsandstein, and are thus contemporaneous with the OMM-Ib
succession, or they mark the base of the OMM-II succession (Jost et al.,
2016). Farther east near the Wohlen area (Figs. 2a and S4d in
the Supplement), foresets of Muschelsandstein cross-beds are 6 to 8 m thick
and in some locations up to 10 m thick as reported by Allen et al. (1985).
Sediment transport directions were oriented towards the SSW, covering the
range between 230<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> SSW and 250<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> WSW and striking
parallel to the topographic axis. Estimates of the water depths of the
Scc Muschelsandstein reveal palaeo-water depths (Table S1 in the Supplement)
between 60 and 100 m.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Sedimentological interpretation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Entlen section</title>
      <p id="d1e1406">The OMM-Ia sedimentary rocks of the Entlen section are assigned to a
backshore to upper nearshore realm within a wave-dominated environment
(Fig. 4a, and please see Table 1 for references). Records of waves are
inferred from (i) tabular, parallel-laminated and normally graded (Sp)
sandstones, which are interpreted to represent sediments of the
surf-and-swash zone near the wet beach where sedimentation occurs in the
upper flow regime; (ii) low-angle cross-beds (Sc) with pebbly lags and shell
fragments (Shf), which could reflect sand reefs (or shoals), rip channel
fills, or storm layers; and (iii) oscillation (Sos) as well as
branching ripple marks (Sbr) pointing to wave activity (Fig. 4a). Gravels
and pebbly lags (Sg) are either evidence of high-energy storm events or
river inflow from the backshore. Finer-grained lithofacies, which are either
indicative of rapid sedimentation (Sv, Mcl; Table 1) or incipient
pedogenesis (Mp, Mm; Table 1), are consistent with a shallow marine,
wave-dominated environment.</p>
      <p id="d1e1409">The basal part of the OMM-Ib suite is assigned to a foreshore to lower
nearshore setting shaped by the combined effect of wave and tidal activity
(Fig. 4a). This is inferred by the observation that current ripple marks
(Scr), which are situated on top of lamina sets of tabular (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
trough cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), point towards an opposite flow direction than
the cross-beds themselves (Fig. 4a). Mudstone drapes (Md) on top of ripple
marks, together with lenticular and flaser interbeds (Mle, Mfl), are
supportive evidence for a tidal environment (references in Table 1). The
occurrence of waves, however, is inferred from parallel-laminated sandstones
(Sp) with parting lineations and ridge-and-swale (Spw) structures at the
base of the OMM-Ib suite. At the top of the OMM-Ib, massive sandstones (Sm)
and mudstones with mottled colours, root casts, and caliche nodules mark the
presence of a backshore, possibly terrestrial setting.</p>
      <p id="d1e1430">The change from a nearshore, wave-dominated environment (OMM-Ia) to an
environment with tidal records (OMM-Ib) was additionally associated with a
deepening from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m at the base of the
OMM-Ib, followed by a regressive sequence. We thus consider the base of this
unit to be the maximum flooding surface (MFS), separating the OMM-I into a
transgressive OMM-Ia unit and a regressive OMM-Ib succession (Figs. 4a and
5a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1456"><bold>(a)</bold> West–east chronological (Wheeler) diagram of the
Molasse sequence at the proximal basin border between Fribourg and Lucerne
(Fig. 2a). The following magnetostratigraphic data have been used: Mt.
Vully, Heitenried, and Sense (Strunck and Matter, 2002), as well as Napf and
Fischenbach (Schlunegger et al., 1996). Palaeo-transport directions from
Heitenried and the upper part of the Sense section are taken from Strunck
and Matter (2002). Note that the Entlen section is not calibrated with
magnetostratigraphic data but has been adjusted using regional information
(see the text for further details and Fig. 3b for synthetic sections of the
region). Note that Pliocene erosion
removed most of the OMM-II record in western Switzerland. We infer marine
conditions in the western Swiss Molasse basin during OMM-II times because
(i) marine conditions were present east of the Napf units, and (ii) material
transport occurred towards the west, which implies that marine conditions
were also present west of the Napf megafan at that time as confirmed by
mapping (e.g. Wanner et al., 2019). <bold>(b)</bold> North–south chronological
(Wheeler) diagram of the Molasse sequence between Entlen (site 13) and
Madiswil (site 14, both in Fig. 2a). See the text for further details. The
onlaps (blue arrows) are based on interpretations from seismostratigraphic
data (Schlunegger et al., 1997a). MFS: maximum flooding surface.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Napf units</title>
      <?pagebreak page2060?><p id="d1e1478">We interpret the association of massive- (Gm) to cross-bedded (Gc)
conglomerates and massive- to cross-bedded sandstones (Sm, Sc) as deposits
within a braided river system (Table 2; please see references there). In
such an environment, conglomerates are common records of active channels.
Massive- (Sm) to cross-bedded (Sc) sandstones alternating with mottled
mudstones were most likely formed on the floodplains bordering the network
of braided channels when bursts resulted in the accumulation of
crevasse splay deposits (Platt and Keller, 1992). Mudstone interbeds (Mp)
with evidence of palaeosol genesis formed when channel belts shifted away
from the axis of the section (Platt and Keller, 1992). This
facies association was mapped over tens of kilometres, both across and along
strike of the basin orientation. It is thus assigned to an alluvial megafan
(Schlunegger and Kissling, 2015), which was deposited by braided streams.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Sense section</title>
      <p id="d1e1489">We assign the OMM of the Sense section to a tidal-dominated environment
in which deltaic estuaries dominated the sedimentary facies (Fig. 4b, and please
see Table 3 for references). This is inferred from (i) sigmoidal
cross-bedded sandstones (Sc) with distinct top sets, foresets, bottom sets, and
pebbly lags (Sg) that are indicative of a delta and (ii) trough
cross-bedded (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and massive-bedded (Sm) sandstones that could
represent mouth bar deposits where estuaries (or tidal inlets) end. In such
environments, current ripple marks (Scr) with mudstone drapes (Md) at the
base of tabular cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) point to rhythmic changes in
tidal current slack-water stages within a subtidal setting, whereas
ripple marks (Sos) with branching crests (Sbr) and parallel-laminated
sandstones (Sp) were most likely formed under the influence of waves close
to the beach. Massive-bedded (Mm), parallel-laminated (Mp), and strongly
bioturbated (Mf) mudstone interbeds are assigned to a tidal flat that
established on the landside margin of the delta. Towards the top of the
section, the facies successively evolves into a fan delta setting. This is
inferred from the observation that the sedimentary suite thickens and
coarsens upwards and ends with massive- to cross-bedded conglomerates (Gm,
Gc), suggesting the progradation of a delta (e.g. Schaad et al., 1992).</p>
      <p id="d1e1510">The first occurrence of 5–10 m thick sandstone beds at the 200 m
stratigraphic level (Fig. 4b) records a remarkable increase in the water
depth when 5–10 m deep tidal channels (Sce sandstone beds with epsilon
cross-beds) grade into several metre-thick subtidal sand waves (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
nearshore tempestites (metre-scale Spw sandstones with ridge-and-swale
geometries; see Table 3 for lithofacies and references). These two latter
lithofacies (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Spw) are interpreted to record the deepest
palaeo-water depth in the Sense section, when water depths were in the range
of up to 30 m. We consider this stratigraphic level to record the
maximum flooding surface (MFS) within the Sense section (Fig. 4b), and we
will use it for correlation purposes with the OMM succession at Entlen (see
the Discussion section).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>St. Magdalena site and Gurten drill core</title>
      <p id="d1e1539">The several metre-thick outcrops near Fribourg are interpreted as subtidal shoal
deposits, which accumulated within a tidal-dominated environment (Table 4;
please see references there). This is inferred from metre-scale
cross-bedded troughs (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) with current ripple marks (Scr) at their
base (see also Homewood and Allen, 1981, for a similar interpretation).
Alternatively, sandstone troughs (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) could be assigned to a
mouth bar environment in which massive-bedded sandstones (Sm) would represent
records of rapid sedimentation. In contrast, mudstone drapes (Md) on top of
the ripple marks (Scr) and cross-beds (Sc) are formed during low-energy
tides or possibly during slack stages. Similar deposits (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, or
possibly Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the Gurten drill core could also be interpreted
as sediments of subtidal shoals; however, due to limited exposure,
interpretations are non-conclusive. Shallow palaeo-water depths are also
inferred from estimates of water depths ranging between 3 and 5 m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Lake Neuch\^{a}tel and Wohlen areas}?><title>Lake Neuchâtel and Wohlen areas</title>
      <p id="d1e1588">We interpret the Scc Muschelsandstein (Table 5) sediments (containing
coquinas, shell fragments (Shf), and pebbles – Sg) to have been deposited
within the topographic axis of the Burdigalian seaway (see also Allen et
al., 1985, and Jost et al., 2016, for a similar interpretation). Metre-scale
cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), locally superimposed by current ripple marks (Scr),
have been interpreted to reveal deposition under strong tidal currents
(Allen et al., 1985). These deposits are thus assigned to offshore,
tidal-dominated sand waves for which sediment transport was NNE- (Lake
Neuchâtel area; Fig. 2a) or SSW-directed (Wohlen area, Fig. 2a). In
places, pebbly lags (Sg) are interpreted as flood-related splays of gravels
into the<?pagebreak page2061?> offshore setting, derived from the neighbouring Napf megafan. In
contrast, the coarse-grained sandstones (Slc Grobsandstein sediments;
Table 5) reveal similarities to the subtidal shoal deposits encountered at
the St. Magdalena site where trough cross-bedded sandstones (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
tabular cross-beds (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) dominate the facies assemblages. However, the
deposits in the Wohlen area are coarser-grained, and cross-beds (Sc) have
larger diameters but similar thicknesses. We relate the coarse-grained
nature of these deposits to the proximity of the Napf megafan in the SW. The
cross-beds with larger wavelengths and similar amplitudes possibly imply
stronger currents compared to the subtidal shoal deposits near
St. Magdalena.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1621">Lithofacies encountered in the Lake Neuchâtel and
Wohlen areas.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="210.550394pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Facies<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>assemblages</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Structures and bedforms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depositional setting and references</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Scc, Sc, Scr, Shf, Sg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Calcareous, shelly sandstones (Scc; Muschelsandstein) are made up of cross-bedded sandstones (Sc) and contain coquinas, shell fragments (Shf), and pebbles (Sg) in places.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: offshore setting, mega-sand waves deposited under strong tidal currents; pebbly lags (Sg) are interpreted as pebbles flushed into the sea by flood events. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baas (1978), Allen et al. (1985), Rust and Gibling (1990), Miall (1996), Jost et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Slc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coarse-grained sandstones (Slc, Grobsandstein) with trough (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and tabular (Sct<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) cross-bedded geometries</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tidal-dominated environment: nearshore to offshore setting, sand waves, or alternatively sand dunes, similar to the subtidal shoal deposits (see St. Magdalena site) but larger in diameter with similar thicknesses. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Allen and Homewood (1984), Jost et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <label>6.1</label><title>Reappraisal of chronostratigraphic framework</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>6.1.1</label><title>Entlen section</title>
      <p id="d1e1744">No magnetostratigraphic data are available for the Entlen section, but a
temporal calibration of the deposits can be achieved through indirect lines
of evidence. This particularly concerns the reconstruction of an age
constraint for the basal transgression, which is accomplished using two
lines of evidence: first, the transgression post-dates the deposition of the
USM, which terminated at C6An1 at the Fischenbach section (Fig. 3b;
Schlunegger et al., 1996). Second, based on stratigraphic interpretations of
palaeo-flow direction data, Strunck and Matter (2002) considered the
transgression of the OMM to have progressed from the east towards the west, where
the first marine sediments have been dated with C6r in the Sense section
(Fig. 3b; see next section). An E–W transgression of the OMM is also
seen in seismic line BEAGBE.N780025 (Fig. S2 in the Supplement), where OMM
deposits onlap the USM in a westward direction. Accordingly, the onset
of the OMM at Entlen on the eastern side of the Napf predates the
transgression at Sense farther west. Based on these arguments, we set an age
of ca. 20 Ma for the base of the OMM-I in the eastern Swiss Molasse basin
(Figs. 3b and 5), which is consistent with Kälin and Kempf (2009). For
the top of the OMM-I, we determine an age using the magnetostratigraphy of
the Napf section (Fig. 3b) ca. 10 km to the west of Entlen. This section
includes an alternation of six reversed- and five normal-polarized magnetozones
(Schlunegger et al., 1996). The lowermost, very long normally polarized
interval (N1, Fig. 3b) includes the mammalian fossil site Hasenbach 1,
recording an MN3b age (Schlunegger et al., 1996) or a lower MN3b age,
as a revision of the mammalian material has shown (Kälin and Kempf,
2009). This allows for a correlation of the normally polarized interval N1 with
chron 5En of the MPTS (Cande and Kent, 1992, 1995) and the ATNTS (Lourens et
al., 2004), respectively (Fig. 3b). Since the third reversed magnetozone of
the Napf section is very short (R2), and since the ATNTS chron 5D spans
several hundred thousand years and is thus quite long, it is most likely that a hiatus
encloses C5Dr2 to C5Dr1 (Fig. 3b). In addition, because (i) the change from
MN3b to MN4a has been calibrated with C5Dr2 (Jost et al., 2016), and since
(ii) the base of the overlying OMM-II (Figs. 3b and 5) has been dated with
MN4 (Keller, 1989), we suggest that the inferred hiatus coincides with the
boundary between the OMM-I and the OMM-II (Figs. 3b and 5). This age
assignment is consistent with magneto-polarity stratigraphy in the Molasse
basin ca. 70 km farther to the east (Kempf and Matter, 1999). It is also
consistent with micro-mammalian investigations in the distal Molasse basin
ca. 30 km farther north where Jost et al. (2016) found that deposits
spanning sometime between late MN3b and MN4a are missing. Based on these constraints, we suggest
that the top of the OMM-I correlates with C5Dr of the MPTS and C5Dr2 of the
ATNTS, respectively, followed by a ca. 0.5 Myr long hiatus (Figs. 3b and 5).
According to this correlation, the sediments recording the maximum flooding
conditions in the Entlen section are ca. 19 Myr old.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>6.1.2</label><title>Wohlen area</title>
      <p id="d1e1755">Correlations of the OMM deposits from the Entlen section with the Wohlen area
were accomplished by Schlunegger et al. (1997a) through a seismostratigraphic
analysis of the seismic line 8307 (please see Fig. 2a for a trace of the line).
The seismic data show that the OMM-I deposits onlap USM strata and
then overlap this unit (Fig. 5b). Schlunegger et al. (1997a) correlated the
OMM-I sequence with their Unit B in the Entlen section, which corresponds to
the top of the OMM-Ia in our stratigraphic scheme. In addition, our field
investigations and micro-mammalian data by Jost et al. (2016) revealed that
the Muschelsandstein follows on top of the OMM-Ia and most likely
corresponds in age to the OMM-Ib. Based on these arguments, we constrain the
deposition in the distal basin to the time interval between ca. 19 and 18 Ma
(Fig. 5b). However, based on seismostratigraphic investigations of
line 8307, Schlunegger et al. (1997a) proposed that sedimentation was
interrupted at ca. 18 Ma by a ca. 0.5 Myr long or possibly longer hiatus. This
time span was later specified through new micro-mammalian discoveries
by Jost et al. (2016), who noted that a record of MN4a is missing in the
Wohlen area and that the base of the OMM-II hosts mammalian fragments that
correspond to MN4b. The interpretation of an inferred unconformity is
additionally supported through observations of vadose cements (Allen et al.,
1985) within the Muschelsandstein and through evidence of a thick
palaeosol separating OMM-I from OMM-II in the Entlen section (see Sects. 4
and 5). We use the occurrence of vadose cements and the palaeosol to
propose that the uppermost beds of the OMM-Ib (including the
Muschelsandstein) were exposed to erosion, or non-sedimentation, after
deposition. Furthermore, because the Muschelsandstein unit records the
deepest water depth<?pagebreak page2062?> during OMM-I times at distal sites, we tentatively suggest
that the deposition of these mega-sand waves started at the same time when the
deepest conditions (MFS) were recorded within the Entlen section (Fig. 5b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>6.1.3</label><title>Sense section</title>
      <p id="d1e1766">Magnetostratigraphic data for the Sense section were presented by Strunck and
Matter (2002). These authors placed the USM–OMM boundary at this site within
C6r of the MPTS (Cande and Kent, 1992, 1995) or alternatively of the ATNTS
(Fig. 3b; Lourens et al., 2004). The subsequent alternation of normal and
reverse magnetozones was correlated by these authors with chrons 6r through
5Dn of Cande and Kent's MPTS (1992, 1995), the latter of which corresponds
to C5Dn1 of the ATNTS (Lourens et al., 2004). Following Strunck and Matter (2002), a possible hiatus prior to ca. 17.7 Ma is also likely to be recorded
within the Sense section (Figs. 3b and 5a). This correlation implies that
the lower Sense Fm corresponds to the OMM-Ia, whereas the upper
Sense Fm and the Kalchstätten Fm are time-equivalent units of the OMM-Ib
(Fig. 3a and b). The topmost 50 m of the Kalchstätten Fm follows
upon this hiatus and corresponds to the OMM-II in our scheme
(Figs. 3 and 5a). This further implies that a hiatus separates OMM-I from
OMM-II across the entire basin (Fig. 5a). In addition, subsequent
sedimentation (base of OMM-II) progressed from the west to the east
(Fig. 5a). In the same sense, the sediment packages recording the
maximum flooding conditions (MFS) most likely have the same age across the
entire basin (Fig. 5a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>6.1.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Lake Neuch\^{a}tel area}?><title>Lake Neuchâtel area</title>
      <p id="d1e1778">No micro-mammalian sites have been reported for the OMM deposits in the
distal western Molasse basin. Therefore, we cannot provide further
constraints on the history of sedimentation. However, our field inspections
in the area of Lake Neuchâtel (Fig. 2a) show a sedimentary succession
similar to that in the east, where amalgamated sandstone beds are overlain
by the Muschelsandstein unit. Our field inspections also show that these
calcareous, shelly sandstones thin from ca. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in the Lake
Neuchâtel area in the west to a few metres towards the distal margin of
the Napf megafan, consistent with the results by Allen et al. (1985).
Because of the architectural similarity between the Muschelsandstein
deposits in the east and the west, we tentatively consider the deposition
of the Muschelsandstein to have occurred synchronously across the entire Swiss
Molasse basin.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <label>6.2</label><title>Evolution of the Molasse basin</title>
      <p id="d1e1800">The chronostratigraphic framework together with the sedimentological data
and palaeo-flow directions are used to propose a scenario of how the basin
evolved through time. During USM times (Fig. 6a), prior to the Burdigalian
transgression, the basin was occupied by alluvial megafans at the proximal
basin border, which gave way to an axially directed channel-belt system in
the distal basin (Fig. 6a; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002). Analysis of
heavy mineral assemblages by Füchtbauer (1964) and measurements of
palaeo-flow directions in our study area (sole casts and cross-beds; this
paper) and in eastern Switzerland (Kempf et al., 1999) revealed a
NE-directed material transport towards the Munich region (Fig. 6a), which is
consistent with the results of previous syntheses (e.g. Pfiffner et al.,
2002; Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002). In this area, the Molasse streams ended in
a peripheral sea where neritic to open marine conditions prevailed
(Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002). Within the basin, a possible divide for
sediment transport was situated somewhere SW of Geneva. We infer such a
separation of sediment dispersal based on published sediment transport
directions. In particular, south of Geneva, tidal cross-beds imply a
sediment dispersal towards the south and thus towards the Tethys (Allen et
al., 1991; Allen and Baas, 1993). To the northeast of Geneva, however, our
own measurements and data from<?pagebreak page2063?> Kempf et al. (1999) reveal a NE-directed
sediment transport to the Paratethys.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1805">Palaeogeographical reconstructions of the Molasse basin
at different stages: <bold>(a)</bold> USM (ca. 22 Ma), <bold>(b)</bold> OMM-Ia
(ca. 20 Ma), <bold>(c)</bold> OMM-Ib (ca. 19–18 Ma), and <bold>(d)</bold> OMM-II to OSM
(ca. 18–14 Ma) modified after Kuhlemann and Kempf (2002) and based on
own observations. Note that all maps show present-day lithotectonic units
within the Alps and the Jura Mountains for orientation purposes (dashed
lines and grey lines). We acknowledge that the positions of these
and the surface patterns (such as lakes) were different during the deposition of
the Molasse deposits. The location of the palaeo-thrust fronts (thick lines)
are adapted from Kuhlemann and Kempf (2002). Black dots mark study sites for
orientation purposes. Please refer to Fig. 1 for the complete legend.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1826">The palaeogeographic reconstruction based on our and published data for the
period between ca. 20 and 19 Ma is shown in Fig. 6b. It illustrates that the
central part of the Molasse basin changed to a shallow marine sea, which was
ca. 40 km wide at that time. Our estimates of palaeo-bathymetric conditions
and sedimentological data (Fig. 4a and b) reveal that the water depths
corresponded to a subtidal and nearshore setting. Nearshore to possibly
offshore conditions (30–50 m) are recorded by subtidal mega-sand waves
(Allen and Bass, 1993) south of Geneva and by the predominance of
sandstone–mudstone alternations within the Boswil and Hünenberg drill
cores in the NE (Wohlen area, Fig. 2a; Schlunegger et al., 1997a). Subtidal
shoals, in up to 5 m deep water, occupied the western part of the central
Swiss Molasse (Fig. 6b). This was already proposed by Homewood and Allen (1981), and it is confirmed here by our sedimentological data and estimates
of palaeo-water depths (see the Supplement). Measurements of sediment transport
directions from the shoal deposits reveal bimodal, SW–NE-directed
transport with a dominant NE orientation. This is particularly the case at
the proximal basin border near the Sense section (Fig. 2a) where deltaic
foresets accumulated within an estuarine setting (Fig. 4b). Mapping of
depositional settings allowed us to trace the shoal deposits towards the
northern tip of the Napf megafan, from which the shoals narrow from
ca. 20 to ca. 10 km over a 70 km long distance along strike. It thus
appears that the shoals were deflected towards the topographic axis through
a dominant NE-directed material transport (Fig. 6b). This interpretation is
additionally supported by measurements of the transport directions of the
Napf megafan (i.e. clast imbrications) and the coastal deposits at the
Entlen section (i.e. parting lineation, cross-beds) pointing material
transport towards the NE (Figs. 4a and 5a). At the distal margin of the
basin, field inspections show that beach sandstones gave way to
subtidal shoal deposits up-section. It thus appears that the Molasse basin
between the Lake Neuchâtel and Wohlen areas (Fig. 2a) was a region of
sediment export to the NE and to the SW. Material transport was most likely
accomplished through strong tidal currents that entered the Swiss Molasse as
two major tidal waves from the Tethys in the south and the Paratethys in the
northeast (Bieg et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e1830">The situation during ca. 19–18 Ma (Fig. 6c) started with the time when the
maximum flooding surface was formed in the depositional record (MFS;
Fig. 5a and b). The sedimentological data reveal that this time was
characterized by a widening of the basin to widths up to 80 km, and it was
dominated by offshore conditions in the topographic axis with water depths
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, as the Muschelsandstein deposits imply (Fig. 6c).
There, cross-bed orientations (our measurements and data by Allen et al.,
1985) and heavy mineral assemblages (Allen et al., 1985) reveal that
sediment transport in the eastern basin axis (Wohlen area) occurred towards
the SW, whereas sediment dispersal in the western basin axis (Lake
Neuchâtel area) was directed towards the NE. We use this information to
propose that a sedimentary depocentre established at the northern tip of the
Napf megafan. In addition, this megafan is interpreted to have experienced a
backstepping (see Sect. 6.3.3 for explanation). We infer such a scenario
from the first appearance of a bimodal E–W orientation of material
transport in the Entlen section (Fig. 5a). Because an E–W-oriented sediment
transport requires a free passage for tidal currents along the southern
basin margin, the seaside margin of the Napf megafan had to step back to
allow such a passage to form (Fig. 6b and c).</p>
      <p id="d1e1843">The palaeogeographic situation shown in Fig. 6d comprises the time span
between ca. 18 and ca. 14 Ma and displays the evolution from the OMM-II to the
OSM. The OMM-II period followed a phase of non-sedimentation and possibly erosion across the entire Swiss Molasse basin, as our reassessment of the
chronological framework of the OMM reveals (Fig. 5a and b). In addition,
measurements of sediment transport directions reveal a SW-oriented sediment
transport at proximal positions (Fig. 5a), which is consistent with the
results of previous syntheses (e.g. Pfiffner et al., 2002; Kuhlemann and
Kempf, 2002). This also implies that a possible E–W divide for sediment
transport shifted towards the region near Munich or even farther east.
Similar to Kuhlemann and Kempf (2002), we infer such a scenario from the
supply of material with sources in the Hercynian basement north of Munich
(Fig. 1a) or the Bohemian massif (Graupensandrinne, Fig. 6d; Allen et
al., 1985; Berger, 1996; see also Sect. 2), which implies a westward tilt of
the basin axis. This period ended with the progradation of the alluvial
megafans during the time of the OSM.</p>
      <p id="d1e1846">In conclusion, this study confirms the results and syntheses of previous
authors on the general sedimentation and material transport pattern during
the deposition of the OMM. Nevertheless, our refinement of the chronological
framework in combination with additional sediment transport data allow us to
specify some further details on the development of the transgression of the
OMM. These include (i) the establishment that the Burdigalian seaway was
accompanied by both a deepening and widening of the basin. These mechanisms
occurred contemporaneously and were associated with a northward shift of the
topographic axis to the distal basin margin, where offshore and thus the deepest
marine conditions established at 19 Ma. (ii) The reversal of the sediment
transport direction from an originally NE-oriented sediment dispersal to a
SW-oriented sediment transport started sometime after 20 Ma and was
completed at 18 Ma at the latest. (iii) A wave-dominated coastline (with
some tidal records) established on the eastern side of the Napf megafan
(Fig. 4a), whereas a tidal-dominated estuarine environment characterized the
proximal coastal margin on the western side of the Napf (Fig. 4b). These
variations in sedimentation pattern appear to explain why the
lithostratigraphic framework differs between the two regions (see Fig. 3a).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2064?><sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <label>6.3</label><title>Mechanisms associated with the transgression of the OMM</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>6.3.1</label><title>Reversal of the drainage direction</title>
      <p id="d1e1864">We relate the reversal of the drainage direction between the OMM-I and the
OMM-II to tectonic processes operating at deeper crustal levels beneath the
Alps. This interpretation is guided by Pfiffner et al. (2002), who related
changes in sediment dispersal within the Swiss part of the basin to a
possible tilt of the foreland plate caused by the westward shift of the
Ivrea body. This tectonic unit is comprised of mantle rocks with a high density
(Fig. 1a) and thus could have influenced the deflection of the foreland
plate (Pfiffner et al., 2002). While this mechanism is a viable explanation
for the westward-directed tilt of the basin axis, we argue that a
complementary driving force beneath the Eastern Alps is required to explain
the drainage reversal across the entire basin, at least between Germany and
Switzerland. We thus present a hypothesis of a possible geodynamic scenario
to explain the 18 Myr old change in the drainage direction in the next
section, but we also acknowledge that this interpretation is speculative at
this stage and warrants further investigations. Such<?pagebreak page2065?> an exploration,
however, requires the geodynamic processes between 33 and 30 Ma to
also be considered. At that time, the subducted European oceanic lithosphere
was considered to have broken off beneath the Central Alps (Davies and von
Blanckenburg, 1995; Schmid et al., 1996). However, underneath the Eastern
Alps the European oceanic lithosphere remained attached to the continental
plate as palinspastic restorations revealed (Handy et al., 2015). The
consequence of slab break-off beneath the Central Alps was the rise of the Alpine topography and a large sediment flux
to the Swiss Molasse basin (Sinclair, 1997; Kuhlemann et al., 2001a, b;
Willett, 2010; Garefalakis and Schlunegger, 2018), which became overfilled
at ca. 30 Ma (Sinclair and Allen, 1992; Sinclair, 1997; see also Sect. 2.1).
East of Munich, however, the basin still remained underfilled until ca. 20 Ma
as evidenced by deep marine sedimentation, whereby debris flows and proximal
turbidites accumulated within the basin axis (Fertig et al., 1991; Malzer et
al., 1993). We use these observations to propose that vertically directed
slab load forces were still downwarping the foreland plate beneath the
Eastern Alps to allow such a deep trough to form. In contrast, slab
break-off beneath the Central Alps most likely caused a rebound of the
foreland plate in Switzerland (Schmid et al., 1996; Schlunegger and
Castelltort, 2016). We interpret the consequence to be a stronger
downward deflection of the European foreland plate beneath the Eastern Alps
compared to the Central Alps, which could explain the east-directed sediment
transport prior to ca. 20 Ma (Fig. 6a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1867">Between ca. 20–17 Ma, i.e. during OMM times, a remarkable change was
recorded in the Molasse basin. The eastern Molasse basin experienced a
change from deep to shallow marine conditions (Kuhlemann and Kempf, 2002),
and the entire basin recorded a reversal of the drainage direction from the
E to the W (see above). We relate these shifts to a change in the pattern of
slab load forces underneath the Eastern and Central Alps. Particularly in
the eastern Molasse basin, the change from deep to shallow marine conditions
could reflect a response to slab unloading through delamination, or
break-off, of the subducted European lithosphere underneath the Eastern Alps
(Ustaszewski et al., 2008), while rollback subduction of the European plate
beneath the Central Alps of Switzerland continued, as Kissling and
Schlunegger (2018) proposed. This could have resulted in a rebound of the
European plate beneath the Eastern Alps, whereas plate downwarping continued
beneath the Central Alps. We interpret these along-strike differences
in the plate deflection to have caused a westward tilt of the foreland plate, which
in turn could have controlled the drainage reversal. The reasons for the
along-strike differences in the subduction mechanisms are not clear at this
stage and could either be related to (i) inheritance related to the Mesozoic
phase of rifting (Schmid et al., 2004; Handy et al., 2010) or (ii) differences in the mechanical strengths and rheological conditions of the
foreland plate between the Swiss and the German–Austrian Molasse basins
(Tesauro et al., 2009, 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>6.3.2</label><title>Widening of the basin</title>
      <p id="d1e1878">The drainage reversal occurred simultaneously with the widening of the basin
in central Switzerland, as our chronological refinement shows. Because both
changes occurred at the same time, one could infer a causality of the
underlying controls. We refrain from such a view at this stage since we lack
a detailed 3-D restoration of the tectonic and geodynamic situation of the
Alps–Molasse basin system for that time. Nevertheless, a
possible control on the widening of the basin can be identified based on a
cross-sectional view across the Central Alps and the related geodynamic
processes during the Burdigalian ca. 20 Myr ago (Fig. 7). At that time, we
propose that the velocity of rollback subduction beneath the Central Alps
of Switzerland was likely to have accelerated. We justify this
interpretation through the observation that (i) tectonic exhumation of the
Lepontine dome (Fig. 1), accomplished through slip along the Simplon
detachment fault (Mancktelow and Grasemann, 1997), occurred at the highest
rates at that time (Boston et al., 2017; Schlunegger and Willet, 1999) and
that (ii) the rapid rise of the Aar massif (Fig. 1) also commenced at 20 Ma
(Herwegh et al., 2017). Following the concepts of Kissling and Schlunegger (2018), these processes require a mechanism whereby buoyant crustal material several tens of kilometres thick
was delaminated from the subducting European
continental plate and accumulated within the crustal root (Fig. 7) within a
short time period. In agreement with Kissling and Schlunegger (2018), we
interpret a rapid phase of rollback subduction as also being able to shift the
basin axis to more distal sites. We use these mechanisms to explain the
cross-sectional widening of the Molasse basin at 19 Ma and the northward
shift of the basin axis (Fig. 7), thereby giving way to the deposition of
the offshore Muschelsandstein (Fig. 6b and c). This lithofacies
association has been mapped along the distal basin border adjacent to the
external massifs only.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1883">Simplified geological–geophysical model of the Alpine
orogen for the time between 20 and 18 Ma, showing the most important
geodynamic forces that might have shaped the Molasse basin and induced the
transgression. Modified after Schlunegger and Kissling (2015) and Kissling
and Schlunegger (2018).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>6.3.3</label><title>Uplift of the Aar massif and establishment of a wave-dominated coast in the east and tidal records in the west</title>
      <p id="d1e1900">We interpret the different coastal morphologies between the eastern and
western sides of the Napf megafan (see Sect. 5) to have rather been controlled by
tectonic processes than by contrasts between the tidal waves from the
Paratethys and the Tethys. We tentatively exclude a surface control at this
stage because the pattern of tidal sand waves in the basin axis is not
reflected by a corresponding coastal morphology at the proximal basin
margin. In particular, the Muschelsandstein cross-beds are thicker in
the Wohlen area (up to 10 m) than in the Neuchâtel region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m; see Sects. 4 and 5 and the Supplement), implying stronger shear
velocities in the eastern basin axis compared to the west. At the proximal
basin margin, however, the coastal deposits on the eastern side of the Napf
predominantly record the activities of waves, while<?pagebreak page2066?> compelling evidence of
tidal activities is more abundant to the west of the Napf megafan. Instead,
because the establishment of wave- and tidal-dominated shorelines occurred
contemporaneously with the rise of Aar massif (Herwegh et al., 2017), we
interpret this tectonic event to have possibly influenced the distribution of
the depositional settings at the proximal basin border. In particular, as we
explain in the following paragraphs, the rise of the Aar massif is likely to
have resulted in a shift of surface loads (Fig. 7) and in a buckling of the
foreland plate at a smaller scale than the deflection of the entire plate itself, which possibly influenced the water depths and the
distribution of facies.</p>
      <p id="d1e1913">Structural mapping in the Aar massif (Wehrens, 2015; Wehrens et al., 2017)
has revealed that crustal blocks were rising along steeply SE-dipping thrust
faults (Fig. 1b). This process was related to rollback subduction of the
European mantle lithosphere and the related delamination of crustal
material, which resulted in the rise of the Aar massif (Herwegh et al.,
2017; Fig. 1b). This mechanism also lifted the topography surrounding the
massif to higher elevations (Fig. 7), thereby forming a positive anomaly in
the topographic load in the region. Sinclair et al. (1991) and Sinclair (1996) explored a possible stratigraphic response to topographic loading
associated with the uplift of the Aar massif (Sinclair et al., 1991) through
the application of a linear elastic plate model where thrusting and erosion
are dynamically coupled. In their model, the distance between the location
of thrusting (Aar massif) and the site in the basin wherein a signal is
expected depends primarily on the flexural rigidity (or alternatively the
elastic thickness or the Te value) of the crustal rocks underlying the
foreland basin (Sinclair, 1996). The flexural rigidity of the rocks beneath
the Swiss Molasse basin has been quantified with an elastic thickness of
ca. 10 km using stratigraphic constraints (Sinclair et al., 1991). This
estimate is particularly based on thickness gradients of accumulated Molasse
deposits across a section from the distal basin border to the Alpine thrust
front. This pattern, however, could have been influenced by upper crustal
inhomogeneities (Waschbusch and Royden, 1992) such as pre-existing
faults (Pfiffner, 1986). This could explain why estimates of Te values that
are based on stratigraphic data are lower (Sinclair et al., 1991;
Schlunegger et al., 1997b) than estimates that are based on the curvature of
the entire European foreland plate from the distal Molasse border to the
core of the Alps and even deeper (Pfiffner et al., 2002; Schlunegger and
Kissling, 2015), where Te values up to 50 km have been proposed (see the discussion
in Pfiffner et al., 2002). However, because the flexural response of the
Molasse basin to local topographic loads was likely to have been influenced
by inherited faults in the basement (Pfiffner, 1986), lower Te values appear
more appropriate (Waschbusch and Royden, 1992). Accordingly, if we consider
a local and thus upper crustal response to loading characterized by a
Te value of ca. 10 km (Sinclair et al., 1991; Schlunegger et al., 1997b), then
shifts in surface loads through the kilometre-thick stacking of additional material
in the Aar massif are likely to have resulted in the formation of several
tens of metres of supplementary accommodation space at the proximal basin
border, as the models of Sinclair et al. (1991) predict. As a result,
depocentres in the Molasse basin are predicted to step back to proximal
positions (Sinclair et al., 1991), which is consistent with our
interpretation of the flow directions and the inferred backstepping of the
Napf megafan (see Sect. 6.1 and Fig. 6). In addition, according to Sinclair (1996), upward-directed bulging of a few tens of metres is expected at the
distal (forebulge) and at the lateral margins of the load (lateral bulge).
The spacing between an expected lateral bulge and the location of the
surface forcing ranges between 50 and 100 km (using a Te value of 10 km), which
is consistent with the distance between the Aar massif and the inferred
subtidal shoals in the western Swiss Molasse basin (near Fribourg; Figs. 2a
and 6b). Accordingly, we suggest that the establishment of subtidal shoals
at the northern tip and on the western side of the Napf is the consequence
of this bulging (Fig. 6b and c). Because the plate had an eastward tilt at
that time, as inferred from palaeo-flow directions, such a flexural signal
could possibly not be recorded on the eastern side of the Aar massif where
the marine conditions were too deep (Fig. 6b and c).</p>
      <p id="d1e1916">We additionally use these mechanisms to explain the development of different
depositional settings at the proximal basin border of the Swiss Molasse
basin. East of the Napf megafan, a relatively high subsidence (rate of
ca. 340 m Ma<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OMM-Ia and ca. 430 m Ma<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OMM-Ib; based on data in Fig. 4a)
most likely resulted in a steeper submarine gradient compared to the west,
where the inferred<?pagebreak page2067?> bulging possibly lowered and subdued the submarine slopes
(subsidence rate of ca. 285 m Ma<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for both OMM-Ia and OMM-Ib; based on data in
Fig. 4b). This could explain why the evidence of wave action is
predominantly recorded along the eastern proximal steeper basin margin.
Indeed, investigations on modern coasts have shown that steeper coasts tend
to promote the formation of larger waves (Flemming, 2011). In contrast, in
the western Swiss Molasse, estuaries and tidal channels could develop as the
wave energy decreased in the subdued coastal landscape. Note that we cannot
fully exclude the possibility that uplift along basement faults beneath the Molasse basin in
western Switzerland (Spicher, 1980) shifted the peripheral sea to shallow
water depths during OMM times. If such a mechanism did occur, then it could
have amplified the effects related to flexural bulging.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>6.3.4</label><title>Controls influencing changes in sediment supply</title>
      <p id="d1e1963">The time around 20 Ma was also characterized by a continuous reduction in
sediment flux from originally 25 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to
ca. 20 Ma to ca. 15 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> thereafter (Kuhlemann, 2000; Kuhlemann et
al., 2001a, b), which could have contributed, together with the tectonic
widening of the basin, to the transgression of the peripheral sea in
Switzerland (Fig. 8). The mechanisms leading to this reduction in surface
mass flux are not fully understood (Kuhlemann et al., 2002) and multiple
hypotheses have been proposed, including the following: (i) shifts towards a dryer
palaeoclimate paired with a widespread exhumation of crystalline rocks with
low bedrock erodibilities (Schlunegger et al., 2001); (ii) tectonic
exhumation of the Lepontine through slip along the Simplon detachment fault,
which occurred in response to rapid rollback subduction (see above and
Kissling and Schlunegger, 2018) – tectonic exhumation was considered to have
shifted the drainage divide farther to the north, thereby substantially
decreasing the source area of the Molasse basin (Kuhlemann et al., 2001a);
and (iii) uplift of the Aar massif, which was considered to have resulted in
a reorganization of the Alpine streams and which was also associated with a
reduction of the source area of the Molasse basin (Kühni and Pfiffner,
2001). Except for the palaeoclimate hypothesis, all other mechanisms are
ultimately linked to the tectonic processes we have outlined in the sections
above.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2010">Molasse stages (USM, OMM, and OSM) with mean
palaeo-transport directions (black arrows), hiatuses plotted against stable
oxygen isotope stages (Miller et al., 1996), and sediment flux (Kuhlemann,
2000; Willet, 2010). The red triangle demarcates the onset of delamination
and rapid exhumation of the Aar massif (Herwegh et al., 2017). Grey arrows
demarcate decreases in sediment flux and falls in the eustatic sea level,
possibly contributing to the related hiatuses. MFS: maximum flooding
surface.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/10/2045/2019/se-10-2045-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3.SSS5">
  <label>6.3.5</label><title>Controls related to changes in eustatic sea level</title>
      <p id="d1e2028">Whereas tectonic processes are recorded in the arrangement of depositional
settings in the entire Swiss Molasse basin, signals related to the eustatic
changes in sea level are possibly recorded by several hiatuses. This
particularly concerns the times of non-sedimentation between OMM-I and
OMM-II and between the OMM and the OSM phase, which we have elaborated on in
Sect. 5.1 (Figs. 5a and 8). In this context, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values
measured on benthic foraminifera have been used as proxy for establishing
patterns of sea level changes (Miller et al., 1998). In particular, a shift
to more positive values of the stable oxygen isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O
implies the growth of polar ice sheets, where lighter oxygen isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) are preferentially stored (Zachos, 2001). As a consequence,
global sea level most likely decreased (the amplitude of the drop is not really
known) during shifts towards heavier (and thus more positive) isotopic
records in planktonic organisms (Miller et al., 1998). These patterns have
been reconstructed by Miller et al. (1996, 1998) at a high resolution.
Shifts towards larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values generally coincide with times
when hiatuses are recorded in the Molasse basin (Fig. 8; see also
Pippèrr and Reichenbacher, 2017; Sant et al., 2017). We thus suggest
that drops in global sea level of a few tens of metres initiated a phase of
non-deposition in the Swiss part of the Molasse basin, at least between
OMM-I and OMM-II at ca. 18 Ma and between the OMM and the OSM. In contrast,
phases of deposition appear to have occurred during periods when the global
sea level was high. This was most likely the case during the deposition of
the OMM-II at ca. 17 Ma when the isotope data imply that the sea reached a
maximum<?pagebreak page2068?> eustatic level, at the least during the Burdigalian (Fig. 8). We
acknowledge that a rising global sea level could also have contributed to the
transgression of the OMM-I and the establishment of the maximum flooding
surface (MFS), but the amplitude of change is much less compared to the
OMM-II. Instead, we consider the reduction in sediment flux and the
changes in tectonic processes to have been exerting a stronger control.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Summary and conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e2085">In summary, we suggest that the Burdigalian transgression was related to a
combination of a deepening and widening of the basin and a reduction of
sediment supply rates, which we ultimately relate to tectonic processes in
the Alpine hinterland. In this context, we consider rollback
subduction to have most likely been responsible for the widening of the basin in the
foreland and for the shift of the basin axis to distal positions. In
addition, rollback subduction of the European mantle lithosphere and
delamination of crustal material most likely resulted in the rapid
exhumation of the Lepontine dome (Boston et al., 2017) and the associated
rise of the Aar massif (Herwegh et al., 2017). These processes are
interpreted to have triggered the change in the configuration of the
drainage network (Schlunegger et al., 2001; Kühni and Pfiffner, 2001),
with the consequence that the sediment flux to the basin decreased. This
reduction in sediment flux, together with the tectonic widening of the
basin, was thus likely to have shifted the basin to underfilled conditions,
which could have allowed the transgression of the peripheral sea in
Switzerland (Fig. 8). In addition, shifts in surface loads, caused by the
rise of the Aar massif, resulted in flexural adjustments in the Molasse
basin through the buckling of the foreland plate at a smaller scale. We suggest that this
influenced the water depths within the basin, which could explain the
development of distinct depositional settings and the formation of
subtidal shoals wherein a lateral bulge is expected. Because of the formation
of shallow marine conditions, subtle changes in eustatic sea level
contributed to the occurrence of several hiatuses (Sant et al., 2017).
Whereas these mechanisms are capable of explaining the establishment of the
Burdigalian seaway and the formation of distinct sedimentological niches in
Switzerland, the drainage reversal during OMM times possibly requires a
change in the tectonic processes at a scale that includes the subduction
history of the entire mountain range, at least between the Eastern and
Central Alps. Current explanations are still speculative and await the
results of ongoing research in the framework of the AlpArray initiative. At
this stage, we conclude that the geodynamic processes in the Alps include
subduction mechanisms, delamination of crustal material, the uplift of
the Aar massif, reorganization of the drainage network, and lower sediment
fluxes, which are reflected in the Swiss Molasse basin through the
establishment of shallow marine conditions and a shift of the topographic
axis towards more distal sites at 19 Ma. Accordingly, the Burdigalian
transgression in Switzerland most likely had a tectonic driving force but
with amplifications through responses occurring on the surface of the Alps
and the Molasse basin.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2092">The dataset is available from the senior author upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2095">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2045-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2045-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2104">FS designed the study. PG carried out the experiments and collected and
interpreted the data with support by FS. The figures and photos were
created by PG with support by FS. FS and PG wrote the text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2110">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2116">Special thanks go to Kenneth Eriksson, Kei Ogata, and an anonymous reviewer for
their constructive and insightful comments. The supportive editorial
handling by Elias Samankassou is kindly acknowledged. We would also like to
thank SEAG (Aktiengesellschaft für Schweizerisches Erdöl), who
provided us with a scan of the seismic line BEAGBE.N780025, and Kellerhals
and Haefeli AG for permission to use the photos of the Gurten drill core.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2122">This research has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 154198).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2128">This paper was edited by Elias Samankassou and reviewed by Kei Ogata, Kenneth Eriksson, and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. R. L.: Sedimentary Structures. Their Characteristics and Physical
Basis. Vol. I, Developments in Sedimentology 30A, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 593 pp., 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. R. L.: Sedimentary Structures. Their Characteristics and Physical
Basis. Vol. I., Developments in Sedimentology 30B, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 679 pp., 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A.: Reconstruction of ancient sea conditions with an example from
the Swiss Molasse, Mar. Geol., 60, 455–473, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A.: Earth Surface Processes, 404 pp. ISBN 0-632-03507-2, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2069?><ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A. and Allen, J. R.: Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications,
Malden, MA, Blackwell Pub., ix, 549 pp., ISBN: 0632052074, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A. and Bass, J. P.: Sedimentology of the Upper Marine Molasse of
the Rhône-Alp region. Eastern France: Implications for basin evolution.
Eclogae Geol. Helv., 86, 121–171, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A. and Homewood, P.: Evolution and mechanics of a Miocene tidal
sandwave, Sedimentology, 31, 63–81, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A., Mange-Rajetky, A., and Matter, A.: Dynamic palaeogeography of
the open Burdigalian seaway, Swiss Molasse basin, Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 78, 351–381, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A., Crampton, S. L., and Sinclair, H. D.: The inception and early
evolution of the North Alpine foreland basin, Switzerland, Basin Res.,
3, 143–163, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Baas, J. H.: Ripple, ripple mark, ripple structure. In: Sedimentology.
Encyclopedia of Earth Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 921–925,
1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Baran, P., Jodłowski, G. S., Krzyżanowski, A., and Zaręba, K.:
Experimental testing of methanol sorption on selected coal samples from
Upper Silesian Basin, Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 40,
261–269, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Beaumont, C.: Foreland basins, Geophys. J. Int., 65,
291–329, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berger, J.-P.: Cartes paléogéographiques-palinspastiques du bassin
molassique suisse (Oligocène inférieur – Miocène moyen), N. Jb.
Geol. Paläont. Abh., 2002, 1–44, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bieg, U., Süss, M. P., and Kuhlemann, J.: Simulation of tidal flow and
circulation patterns in the Early Miocene (Upper Marine Molasse) of the
Alpine foreland basin, Analogue and Numerical Modelling of Sedimentary
Systems: From Understanding to Prediction, 40, 145–169, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Boston, K. R., Rubatto, J., Hermann, J., Engi, M., and Amelin, Y.:
Geochronology of accessory allanite and monazite in the Barrovian
metamorphic sequence of the Central Alps, Switzerland, Lithos,
286–287, 502–518, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bridge, J. S. and Tye, R. S.: Interpreting the dimensions of ancient fluvial
channel bars, channels and channel belts from wireline-logs and cores, AAPG
Bull., 84, 1205–1228, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cande, S. C. and Kent, D. V.: A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the
Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, J. Geophys. Res., 97,
913–951, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cande, S. C. and Kent, D. V.: Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity
timescale for the Late Cretacesou and Cenocoic, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, 6093–6095, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cederbom, C. E., Sinclair, H. D., Schlunegger, F., and Rahn, M.:
Climate-induced rebound and exhumation of the European Alps, Geology, 32,
709–712, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cederbom, C. E., van der Beek, P., Schlunegger, F., Sinclair, H. D., and
Oncken, O.: Rapid extensive erosion of the North Alpine foreland basin at
5–4 Ma, Basin Res., 23, 528–550, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clifton, H. E. and Dingler, J. R.: Wave-Formed Structures and
Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction, Mar. Geol., 60, 165–198, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Daidu, F., Yuan, W., and Min, L.: Classifications, sedimentary features and
facies associations of tidal flats,  J. Palaeogeogr., 2,
66–80, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dam, G. and Andreasen, F.: High-energy ephemeral stream deltas; an example
from the Upper Silurian Holmestrand Formation of the Oslo Region, Norway,
Sediment. Geol., 66, 197–225, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Davies, J. and von Blanckenburg, F.: Slab breakoff: A model of lithosphere
detachment and its test in the magmatism and deformation of collisional
orogens, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 129, 85–102, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
DeCelles, P. G.: Late Jurassic to Eocene evolution of the Cordilleran
thrust belt and foreland basin system, western USA, Am. J.
Sci., 304, 105–168, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
DeCelles, P. G. and Giles, K. A.: Foreland basin systems, Basin Res., 8,
105–123, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Diem, B.: Analytical method for estimating paleowave climate and water
depth from wave ripple marks, Sedimentology, 32, 705–720, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Diem, B.: Die Untere Meeresmolasse zwischen der Saane (Westschweiz) und der
Ammer (Oberbayern), Eclogae Geol. Helv., 79, 493–559, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Doppler, G.: Zur Stratigraphie der nördlichen Vorlandmolasse in
Bayerisch-Schwaben, Geologica Bavarica, 94, 83–133, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fertig, J., Graf, R., Lohr, H., Mau, J., and Müller, M.: Seismic sequence
and facies analysis of the Puchkirchen Formation, Molasse basin, south-east
Bavaria, Germany, Eur. Assoc. Pet. Geosci. Spec. Publ., 1, 277–287, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Flemings, P. B. and Jordan, T. E.: Stratigraphic modeling of foreland
basins: Interpreting thrust deformation and lithosphere rheology, Geology,
18, 430–434, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Flemming, B. W.: Geology, Morphology, and Sedimentology of Estuaries and
Coasts, Treatise on Estuaries and Coasts, 3, 7–38, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frieling, D., Mazumder, R., and Reichenbacher, B.: Tidal sediments in the
Upper Marine Molasse (OMM) of the Allgäu area (Lower Miocene,
Southwest-Germany), Neues Jahrb. Geol.
P.-A., 254, 151–163, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Froitzheim, N., Schmid, S. M., and Frey, M.: Mesozoic paleogeography and the
timing of eclogite-facies metamorphism in the Alps: A working hypothesis,
Eclogae Geol. Helv., 89, 81–110, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fry, B., Deschamps, F., Kissling, E., Stehly, L., and Giardini, D.: Layered
azimuthal anisotropy of Rayleigh wave phase velocities in the European
Alpine lithosphere inferred from ambient noise, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 297, 95–102, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Füchtbauer, H.: Sedimentpetrographische Untersuchungen in der
älteren Molasse nördlich der Alpen, Eclogae Geol. Helv.,
61, 157–298, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Garefalakis, P. and Schlunegger, F.: Link between concentrations of
sediment flux and deep crustal processes beneath the European Alps,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17182-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-17182-8</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Haldemann, E. G., Haus, H. A., Holliger, A., Liechti, W., Rutsch, R. F., and
Della Valle, G.: Geologischer Atlas der Schweiz, Blatt 1188 Eggiwil (Nr.
75): Schweizerische Geologische Kommission, scale 1 : 25 000, 1 sheet, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hammer, B.: Sedimentologie der Oberen Meeresmolasse im Raum St. Gallen,
unpublished Diploma thesis, Univ. Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 96 pp., 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Handy, M. R., Schmid, S. M., Bousquet, R., Kissling, E., and Bernoulli, D.:
Reconciling plate-tectonic reconstructions of Alpine Tethys with the
geological – geophysical record of spreading and subduction in the Alps,
Earth Sci. Rev., 102, 121–158, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Handy, M. R., Ustaszewski, K., and Kissling, E.: Reconstructing the
Alps-Carpathians-Dinarides as key to understanding switches i<?pagebreak page2070?>n subduction
polarity, slab gaps and surface motion, Int. J. Earth
Sci., 104, 1–26, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Herwegh, M., Berger, A., Baumberger, R., Wehrens, P., and Kissling, E.:
Large-scale crustal-block-extrusion during Late Alpine collision, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 7, 413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00440-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-00440-0</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hilgen, F. J., Lourens, L. J., Van Dam, J. A.,  Beu, A. G., Boyes, A. F., Cooper, R. A., Krijgsman, W., Ogg, J. G., Piller, W. E., and Wilson, D. S.: Chapter 29 – The Neogene Period, edited by: Gradstien, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., and Ogg, G. M., The Geologic Time Scale, Elsevier, 923–978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00029-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00029-9</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Homewood, P. and Allen, P. A.: Wave-, Tide-, and Current-Controlled
Sandbodies in Miocene Molasse, Western Switzerland, Am. Assoc.
Petr. Geol. B., 65, 2534–2545, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Homewood, P., Allen, P. A. and Williams, G. D.: Dynamics of the Molasse Basin
of western Switzerland, Spec. Publs int. Ass. Sediment., 8, 199–217,
1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hurford, A. J.: Cooling and uplift patterns in the Lepontine Alps, south
central Switzerland and an age of vertical movement on the Insubric fault
line, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 93, 413–427, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Isler, A. and Murer, R.: Geologische Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1149
Wolhusen 1 : 25 000, Karte 164, Bundesamt für Landestopographie swisstopo,  Bern,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jin, J., Aigner, T., Luterbacher, H. P., Bachmann, G. H., and Müller, M.:
Sequence stratigraphy and depositional history in the south-eastern German
Molasse Basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 12, 929–940, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jordan, T. E.: Thrust loads and foreland basin evolution, Cretaceous,
western United States, AAPG Bull., 65, 2506–2520, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jordan, T. E. and Flemings, P. B.: Large-scale stratigraphic architecture,
eustatic variation, and unsteady tectonism: A theoretical evaluation.
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 96, 6681–6699, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jost, J., Kempf, O., and Kälin, D.: Stratigraphy and palaeoecology of
the Upper Marine Molasse (OMM) of the central Swiss Plateau, Swiss J.
Geosci., 109, 149–169, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kälin, D. and Kempf, O.: High-resolution stratigraphy from the
continental record of the Middle Miocene Northern Alpine Foreland Basin of
Switzerland, N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 254, 177–235, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Keller, B.: Fazies und Stratigraphie der Oberen Meeresmolasse (Unteres
Miozän) zwischen Napf und Bodensee, PhD, Bern, 302 pp., University of Bern, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Keller, B.: Wirkung von Wellen und Gezeiten bei der Ablagerung der Oberen
Meeresmolasse–Löwendenkmal und Gletschergarten–zwei anschauliche
geologische Studienobjekte, Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft
Luzern, 31, 245–271, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O.: Magnetostratigraphy and facies evolution of the Lower Freshwater
Molasse (USM) of eastern Switzerland, PhD, Bern, 138 pp., University of Bern, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O. and Matter, A.: Magnetostratigraphy and depositional history of
the Upper Freshwater Molasse (OSM) of eastern Switzerland, Eclogae
Geol. Helv., 92, 97–103, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O., Bolliger, T., Kälin, D., Engesser, B., and Matter, A.: New
magnetostratigraphic calibration of Early to Middle Miocene mammal biozones
of the North Alpine foreland basin, Mém. Trav. EPHE Inst. Montpellier,
21, 547–561, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O., Matter, A., Burbank, D. W., and Mange, M.: Depositional and
structural evolution of a foreland basin margin in a magnetostratigraphic
framework: the eastern Swiss Molasse basin, Int. J. Earth
Sci., 88, 253–275, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kissling, E. and Schlunegger, F.: Rollback orogeny model for the evolution
of the Swiss Alps, Tectonics, 37, 1097–1115, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J.: Post-collisional sediment budget of circum-Alpine basins
(Central Europe), Mem. Sci. Geol. Padova, 52, 1–91, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J. and Kempf, O.: Post-Eocene evolution of the North Alpine
Foreland Basin and its response to Alpine tectonics, Sediment. Geol.,
152, 45–78, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J., Frisch, W., Dunkl, I., Sze ìkely, B., and Spiegel, C.:
Miocene shifts of the drainage divide in the Alps and their foreland basin,
Z. Geomorphol. N. F.,  45, 239–265, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J., Frisch, W., Dunkl, I., and Székely, B.: Quantifying
tectonic versus erosive denudation by the sediment budget: The Miocene core
complexes of the Alps, Tectonophysics, 330, 1–23, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J., Frisch, W., Székely, B., Dunkl, I., and Kázmér,
M.: Post-collisional sediment budget history of the Alps: tectonic versus
climatic control, Int. J. Earth Sci., 91,
818–837, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kühni, A. and Pfiffner, O. A.: The relief of the Swiss Alps and
adjacent areas and its relation to lithology and structure: topographic
analysis from a 250-m DEM, Geomorphology, 41, 285–307, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Leclair, S. F. and Bridge, J. S.: Quantitative interpretation of sedimentary
structures formed by river dunes, J. Sediment. Res., 71,
713–716, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lemcke, K., Engelhardt, W. V., and Füchtbauer, H.: Geologische und
sedimentpetrographische Untersuchungen im-Westteil der ungefalteten Molasse
des süddeutschen-Alpenvorlandes, Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch, 11,
1–182, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lihou, J. C. and Allen, P. A.: Importance of inherited rift margin structures
in the early North Alpine Foreland Basin, Switzerland, Basin Res., 8,
425–442, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lippitsch, R., Kissling, E., and Ansorge, J.: Upper mantle structure beneath
the Alpine orogen from high-resolution teleseismic tomography, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 2376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JB002016</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lourens, L. J., Hilgen, F. J., Laskar, J., Shackleton, N. J., and Wilson, D.:
The Neogene Period. A Geologic Time Scale 2004, Cambridge University Press,
409–440, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lu, G., Winkler, W., Rahn, M., von Quadt, A., and Willett, S. D.: Evaluating
igneous sources of the Taveyannaz formation in the Central Alps by detrital
zircon U–Pb age dating and geochemistry, Swiss J. Geosci.,
111, 399–416, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Malzer, O., Rögl, F., Seifert, P., Wagner, L., Wessely, G., and Brix, F.:
Die Molassezone und deren Untergrund. Erdöl und Erdgas in
Österreich, 281–322, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mancktelow, N.: The Simplon Line: a major displacement zone in the western
Lepontine Alps, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 78, 73–96, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mancktelow, N. S. and Grasemann, B.: Time-dependent effects of heat
advection and topography on cooling histories during erosion,
Tectonophysics, 270, 167–195, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Matter, A.: Sedimentologische Untersuchungen im östlichen Napfgebiet
(Entlebuch–Tal der Grossen Fontanne, Kt. Luzern), Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 57, 315–429, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2071?><ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Matter, A., Homewood, P., Caron, C., Rigassi, D., van Stuijvenberg, J.,
Weidmann, M., and Winkler, W.: Flysch and Molasse of western and central
Switzerland, Exc. Guidebook No. 126A, 26th Int. Geol. Congr. Schweiz.
Geol. Komm. Wepf and Co. Publ., Basel, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mazurek, M. Hurford, A., and Leu, W.: Unravelling the multi-stage burial history of
the Swiss Molasse basin: Integration of Apatite fission track, vitrinite
reflectance and biomarker isomerisation analysis, Basin Res., 18,
27–50, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mein, P.: Résultats du groupe de travail des vertébrés:
Biozonation du Néogène méditerranéen à partir des
Mammifères, in: Report on Activity of RCMNS Working Groups (1971–1975), 77–81, edited by: Sénès, J., IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy, Subcommission on Neogene Stratigraphy, Vertebrata, Bratislava, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mein, P.: Rapport d'activité du Groupe de Travail Vertébrés
Mise à jour de la biostratigraphie du Néogène basée sur les
Mammifères, Ann. géol. Pays Héilen., Tome hors série, 3,
1367–1372 (VII International Congress on Mediterranean Neogene, Athens,
1979), 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mein, P.: Updating of MN zones, in:
European Neogene mammal chronology. NATO ASI, Life Sci. 180, edited by: Lindsay, E., Fahlbusch, V., and Mein, P.,  Plenum
Press, New York, 73–90, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miall, A. D.: Lithofacies types and vertical profile models in braided river
deposits, a summary, in:  Fluvial sedimentology, edited by:  Miall, A. D., Can.
Soc. Petr. Geol. Mem., 5, 597–604, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miall, A. D.: Architectural-Element Analysis: A New Method of Facies
Analysis Applied to Fluvial Deposits, Earth-Sci. Rev., 22, 261–308, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miall, A. D.: The Geology of Fluvial Deposits. Sedimentary Facies, Basin
Analysis, and Petroleum Geology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 582 pp., 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miller, M. C. and Komar, P. D.: Oscillation Sand Ripples Generated by
Laboratory Apparatus, J. Sediment. Res., 50, 173–182,
1980a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miller, M. C. and Komar, P. D.: A field investigation of the relationship
between oscillation ripple spacinng and the near-bottom water orbital
motions, J. Sediment. Res., 50, 183–191, 1980b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miller, K. G., Mountain, G. S., the Leg 150 Shipboard Party, and Members of
the New Jersey Coastal Plain Drilling Project: Drilling and dating New
Jersey Oligocene–Miocene sequences: Ice volume, global sea level, and Exxon
records, Science, 271, 92–94, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miller, K. G., Mountain, G. S., Browning, J. V., Kominz, M., Sugarman, P. J.,
Christie-Blick, N., Katz, M. E., and Wright, J. D.: Cenozoic global sea level,
sequences, and the New Jersey transect: results from coastal plain and
continental slope drilling, Rev. Geophys., 36, 569–601, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nichols, P. G.: Sedimentology &amp; Stratigraphy, Blackwell Sci., 355 pp.,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ortner, H., Fügenschuh, B., Zerlauth, M., and Hinsch, R.: Geometry, sequence and amount of thrusting in the Subalpine Molasse of Austria and Bavaria, in: Fragile Earth: Geological Processes from Global to Local Scales and Associated Hazards, edited by: Friedrich, A., Hofmann, F., and Neumeier, G., GV-GSA joint meeting, Abstracts and Programs, 4–7 September 2011, Munich, A35, Boulder, Geological Society of America, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pfiffner, O. A.: Evolution of the north Alpine foreland basin in the Central
Alps. Special Publication, Int. As. Sed., 8,
219–228, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pfiffner, O. A., Schlunegger, F., and Buiter, S. J. H.: The Swiss Alps and
their peripheral foreland basin: Stratigraphic response to deep crustal
processes, Tectonics, 6, 1054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002TC001465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002TC001465</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pippèrr, M. and Reichenbacher, B.: Late Early Miocene
palaeoenvironmental changes in the North Alpine Foreland Basin,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 468, 485–502, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Platt, N. H. and Keller, B.: Distal alluvial deposits in a foreland basin
setting – the Lower Freshwater Miocene), Switzerland: sedimentology,
architecture and palaeosols, Sedimentology, 39, 545–565, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Python, C.: Geologische Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1185 Fribourg
1 : 25 000, Bundesamt für Landestopographie swisstopo, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reichenbacher, B., Krijgsman, W., Lataster, Y., Pipperr, M., Van Baak, C.
G., Chang, L., Kälin, D., Jost, J., Doppler, G., Jung, D., Priet, J.,
Abdul Aziz, H., Böhme, M., Garnish, J., Kirscher, U., and Bachtadse, V.:
A new magnetostratigraphic framework for the Lower Miocene
(Burdigalian/Ottnangian, Karpatian) in the North Alpine Foreland Basin,
Swiss J. Geosci., 106, 309–334, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reichenwallner, S.: Die vulkanische Aktivität in den Westalpen
hergeleitet aus detritischem Amphibol und Klinopyroxen im
Taveyannaz-Sandstein, unpublished Ms thesis, University of Bern, Bern, 57 pp., 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Reineck, H. E. and Singh, I. B.: Depositional sedimentary environments,
Springer, 549 pp., 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rust, B. R. and Gibling, M. R.: Braidplain evolution in the Pennsylvanian
South Bar Formation, Sydney basin, Noca Scotia, Canada, J.
Sediment. Petrol., 60, 59–72, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Salvermoser, S.: Zur Sedimentologie gezeiten-beeinflusster Sande in der
Oberen Meeresmolasse und Süssbrackwassermolasse (Ottnangium) von
Niederbayern und Oberösterreich, Münchner Geologische Hefte A, 26,
1–179, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sant, K. V., Palcu, D., Mandic, O., and Krijgsman, W.: Changing seas in the
Early–Middle Miocene of Central Europe: a Mediterranean approach to
Paratethyan stratigraphy, Terra Nova, 29, 273–281, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schaad, W., Keller, B., and Matter, A.: Die Obere Meeresmolasse (OMM) am
Pfänder: Beispiel eines Gilbert-Deltakomplexes, Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 85, 145–168, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Shanmugam, G.: Deep-marine tidal bottom currents and their reworked sands
in modern and ancient submarine canyons, Mar. Petroleum Geol., 20, 471–491, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schlunegger, F. and Castelltort, S.: Immediate and delayed signal of slab
breakoff in Oligo/Miocene Molasse deposits from the European Alps,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 31010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep31010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schlunegger, F. and Kissling, E.: Slab rollback orogeny in the Alps and
evolution of the Swiss Molasse basin, Nat. Commun., 6, 8605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9605</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F. and Willett, S.: Spatial and temporal variations in
exhumation of the central Swiss Alps and implications for exhumation
mechanisms, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ.,
154, 157–179, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2072?><ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Burbank, D. W., Matter, A., Engesser, B., and Mödden,
C.: Magnetostratigraphic calibration of the Oligocene to Middle Miocene
(30–15 Ma) mammal biozones and depositional sequences of the Swiss Molasse
Basin, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 89, 753–788, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Leu, W., and Matter, A.: Sedimentary Sequences, Seismic
Facies, Subsidence Analysis, and Evolution of the Burdigalian Upper Marine
Molasse Group, Central Switzerland, AAPG Bull., 81, 1185–1207, 1997a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Jordan, T. E., and Klaper, E. M.: Controls of erosional
denudation on foreland basin evolution: The Oligocene central Swiss Molasse
Basin as an example, Tectonics, 16, 823–840, 1997b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Slingerland, R., and Matter, A.: Crustal thickening and
crustal extension as controls on the evolution of the drainage network of
the central Swiss Alps between 30 Ma and the present: constraints from the
stratigraphy of the North Alpine Foreland Basin and the structural evolution
of the Alps, Basin Res., 86, 717–750, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Melzer, J., and Tucker, G.: Climate, exposed source-rock
lihtologies, crustal uplift and surface erosion: a theoretical analysis
calibrated with data from the Alps/North Alpine Foreland Basin system,
Int. J. Earth Sci., 90, 484–499, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Anspach, O., Bieri, B., Böning, P., Kaufmann, Y., Lahl,
K., Lonschinski, M., Mollet, H., Sachse, D., Schubert, C., Stöckli, G.,
and Zander, I.: Geologische Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1169
Schüpfheim 1 : 25 000, Bundesamt für Landestopographie swisstopo,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Pfiffner, O. A., Froitzheim, N., Schönborn, G., and
Kissling, E.: Geophysical-geological transect and tectonic evolution of the
Swiss-Italian Alps, Tectonics, 15, 1036–1064, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Fügenschuh, B., Kissling, E., and Schuster, R.: Tectonic
map and overall architecture of the Alpine orogen, Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 97, 93–117, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D.: Plan-view curvature of foreland basins and its
implications for the palaeostrength of the lithosphere underlying the
western Alps, Basin Res., 8, 173–182, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D.: Flysch to molasse transition in peripheral foreland
basins: The role of the passive margin versus slab breakoff, Geology,
25, 1123–1126, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sinclair, H. D. and Allen, P. A.: Vertical versus horizontal motions in the
Alpine orogenic wedge: stratigraphic response in the foreland basin, Basin
Res., 4, 215–232, 1992.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D., Coakley, B. J., Allen, P. A., and Watts, A. B.: Simulation of
foreland basin stratigraphy using a diffusion model of mountain belt uplift
and erosion: An example from the Central Alps, Switzerland, Tectonics, 10,
599–620, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Spicher, A.: Tectonic Map of Switzerland, Schweizerische Geologische
Kommission, Basel, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Strunck, P. and Matter, A.: Depositional evolution of the western Swiss
Molasse, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 95, 197–222, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tesauro, M., Kaban, M. K., and Cloething, S. A. P. L.: How rigid is Europe's
lithosphere?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–6, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tesauro, M., Kaban, M. K., and Cloething, S. A. P. L.: Global model for the
lithospheric strength and effective elastic thickness,  Tectonophysics, 602,
78–86, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ustaszewski, K., Schmid, S.M, Fügenschuh, B., Tischler, M., Kissling, E.
and Spakman, W.: A map-view restoration of the Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaridic
system for the Early Miocene. Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 101 (Suppl. 1),
273–294, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Waschbusch, P. J.  and Royden, L. H.: Spatial and temporal evolution of
foredeep basins: lateral strength variations and inelastic yielding in
continental lithosphere, Basin Res., 4, 179–196, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wanner, J., Gisler, C., Jost, J., Christener, F., and Ninck, T.: Geologische
Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1148 Sumiswald 1 : 25 000, Karte 163, Bundesamt für
Landestopographie swisstopo, Bern,  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P.: Structural evolution in the Aar Massif (HaslitaI transect):
Implications for midcrustal deformation, PhD, University of Bern, Bern, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P., Baumberger, R., Berger, A., and Herwegh, M.: How is strain
localized in a meta-granitoid, mid-crustal basement section? Spatial
distribution of deformation in the central Aar massif (Switzerland), J. Struct. Geol., 94, 47–67, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Willett, S. D.: Late Neogene erosion of the Alps: A climate driver?, Annu.
Rev. Earth  Pl. Sc., 38, 411–437, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yalin, M. S.: Geometrical properties of sand waves, J.
Hydr. Div.-ASCE, 90, 105–119, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L. Thomas, E., and Billups, K.: Trends,
rhythms and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present, Science, 292,
686–693, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Tectonic processes, variations in sediment flux, and eustatic sea level recorded by the 20&thinsp;Myr old Burdigalian transgression in the Swiss Molasse basin</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The stratigraphic architecture of the Swiss Molasse basin, situated on the
northern side of the evolving Alps, reveals crucial information about the
basin's geometry, its evolution, and the processes leading to the deposition
of the siliciclastic sediments. Nevertheless, the formation of the Upper
Marine Molasse (OMM) and the controls on the related Burdigalian
transgression have still been a matter of scientific debate. During the time
period from ca. 20 to 17&thinsp;Ma, the Swiss Molasse basin was partly flooded by a
shallow marine sea striking SW–NE. Previous studies have proposed that
the transgression occurred in response to a rise in global sea level,
a reduction of sediment flux, or an increase in tectonically controlled
accommodation space. Here, we readdress this problem and extract
stratigraphic signals from the Burdigalian molasse deposits that can be
related to changes in sediment supply rate, variations in the eustatic sea
level, and subduction tectonics. To achieve this goal, we conducted
sedimentological and stratigraphic analyses of several sites across the
entire Swiss Molasse basin.</p><p>Field investigations show that the transgression and the subsequent
evolution of the Burdigalian seaway was characterized by (i) a deepening and
widening of the basin, (ii) phases of erosion and non-deposition during Lower Freshwater Molasse (USM),
OMM, and Upper Freshwater Molasse (OSM) times, and (iii) changes in along-strike drainage reversals. We
use these changes in the stratigraphic record to disentangle
tectonic and surface controls on the facies evolution at various scales. As
the most important mechanism, rollback subduction of the European mantle
lithosphere most likely caused a further downwarping of the foreland plate,
which we use to explain the deepening and widening of the Molasse basin,
particularly at distal sites. In addition, subduction tectonics also caused
the uplift of the Aar massif. This process was likely to have shifted the
patterns of surface loads, thereby resulting in a buckling of the foreland
plate and influencing the water depths in the basin. We use this mechanism
to explain the establishment of distinct depositional settings,
particularly the formation of subtidal shoals wherein a bulge in relation to
this buckling is expected. The rise of the Aar massif also resulted in a
reorganization of the drainage network in the Alpine hinterland, with the
consequence that the sediment flux to the basin decreased. We consider
this reduction in sediment supply to have amplified the tectonically controlled deepening of the Molasse basin. Because the marine conditions
were generally very shallow, subtle changes in eustatic sea level
contributed to the formation of several hiatuses that chronicle periods of
erosion and non-sedimentation. These processes also amplified the
tectonically induced increase in accommodation space during times of global
sea level highstands. Whereas these mechanisms are capable of explaining the
establishment of the Burdigalian seaway and the formation of distinct
sedimentological niches in the Swiss Molasse basin, the drainage reversal
during OMM times possibly requires a change in tectonic processes at the
slab scale, most likely including the entire Alpine range between the Eastern
and Central Alps.</p><p>In conclusion, we consider rollback tectonics to be the main driving force
controlling the transgression of the OMM in Switzerland, with contributions
by the uplift of individual crustal blocks (here the Aar massif) and by a reduction of sediment supply. This reduction of sediment flux was likely to have been controlled by
tectonic processes as well when basement blocks became uplifted, thereby
modifying the catchment geometries. Eustatic changes in sea level explain
the various hiatuses and amplified the deepening of the basin during
eustatic highstand conditions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. R. L.: Sedimentary Structures. Their Characteristics and Physical
Basis. Vol. I, Developments in Sedimentology 30A, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 593 pp., 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. R. L.: Sedimentary Structures. Their Characteristics and Physical
Basis. Vol. I., Developments in Sedimentology 30B, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 679 pp., 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A.: Reconstruction of ancient sea conditions with an example from
the Swiss Molasse, Mar. Geol., 60, 455–473, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A.: Earth Surface Processes, 404 pp. ISBN 0-632-03507-2, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A. and Allen, J. R.: Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications,
Malden, MA, Blackwell Pub., ix, 549 pp., ISBN: 0632052074, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A. and Bass, J. P.: Sedimentology of the Upper Marine Molasse of
the Rhône-Alp region. Eastern France: Implications for basin evolution.
Eclogae Geol. Helv., 86, 121–171, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A. and Homewood, P.: Evolution and mechanics of a Miocene tidal
sandwave, Sedimentology, 31, 63–81, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A., Mange-Rajetky, A., and Matter, A.: Dynamic palaeogeography of
the open Burdigalian seaway, Swiss Molasse basin, Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 78, 351–381, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, P. A., Crampton, S. L., and Sinclair, H. D.: The inception and early
evolution of the North Alpine foreland basin, Switzerland, Basin Res.,
3, 143–163, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Baas, J. H.: Ripple, ripple mark, ripple structure. In: Sedimentology.
Encyclopedia of Earth Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 921–925,
1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Baran, P., Jodłowski, G. S., Krzyżanowski, A., and Zaręba, K.:
Experimental testing of methanol sorption on selected coal samples from
Upper Silesian Basin, Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 40,
261–269, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Beaumont, C.: Foreland basins, Geophys. J. Int., 65,
291–329, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, J.-P.: Cartes paléogéographiques-palinspastiques du bassin
molassique suisse (Oligocène inférieur – Miocène moyen), N. Jb.
Geol. Paläont. Abh., 2002, 1–44, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bieg, U., Süss, M. P., and Kuhlemann, J.: Simulation of tidal flow and
circulation patterns in the Early Miocene (Upper Marine Molasse) of the
Alpine foreland basin, Analogue and Numerical Modelling of Sedimentary
Systems: From Understanding to Prediction, 40, 145–169, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Boston, K. R., Rubatto, J., Hermann, J., Engi, M., and Amelin, Y.:
Geochronology of accessory allanite and monazite in the Barrovian
metamorphic sequence of the Central Alps, Switzerland, Lithos,
286–287, 502–518, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bridge, J. S. and Tye, R. S.: Interpreting the dimensions of ancient fluvial
channel bars, channels and channel belts from wireline-logs and cores, AAPG
Bull., 84, 1205–1228, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cande, S. C. and Kent, D. V.: A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the
Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, J. Geophys. Res., 97,
913–951, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cande, S. C. and Kent, D. V.: Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity
timescale for the Late Cretacesou and Cenocoic, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, 6093–6095, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cederbom, C. E., Sinclair, H. D., Schlunegger, F., and Rahn, M.:
Climate-induced rebound and exhumation of the European Alps, Geology, 32,
709–712, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cederbom, C. E., van der Beek, P., Schlunegger, F., Sinclair, H. D., and
Oncken, O.: Rapid extensive erosion of the North Alpine foreland basin at
5–4 Ma, Basin Res., 23, 528–550, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Clifton, H. E. and Dingler, J. R.: Wave-Formed Structures and
Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction, Mar. Geol., 60, 165–198, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Daidu, F., Yuan, W., and Min, L.: Classifications, sedimentary features and
facies associations of tidal flats,  J. Palaeogeogr., 2,
66–80, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Dam, G. and Andreasen, F.: High-energy ephemeral stream deltas; an example
from the Upper Silurian Holmestrand Formation of the Oslo Region, Norway,
Sediment. Geol., 66, 197–225, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Davies, J. and von Blanckenburg, F.: Slab breakoff: A model of lithosphere
detachment and its test in the magmatism and deformation of collisional
orogens, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 129, 85–102, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
DeCelles, P. G.: Late Jurassic to Eocene evolution of the Cordilleran
thrust belt and foreland basin system, western USA, Am. J.
Sci., 304, 105–168, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
DeCelles, P. G. and Giles, K. A.: Foreland basin systems, Basin Res., 8,
105–123, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Diem, B.: Analytical method for estimating paleowave climate and water
depth from wave ripple marks, Sedimentology, 32, 705–720, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Diem, B.: Die Untere Meeresmolasse zwischen der Saane (Westschweiz) und der
Ammer (Oberbayern), Eclogae Geol. Helv., 79, 493–559, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Doppler, G.: Zur Stratigraphie der nördlichen Vorlandmolasse in
Bayerisch-Schwaben, Geologica Bavarica, 94, 83–133, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fertig, J., Graf, R., Lohr, H., Mau, J., and Müller, M.: Seismic sequence
and facies analysis of the Puchkirchen Formation, Molasse basin, south-east
Bavaria, Germany, Eur. Assoc. Pet. Geosci. Spec. Publ., 1, 277–287, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Flemings, P. B. and Jordan, T. E.: Stratigraphic modeling of foreland
basins: Interpreting thrust deformation and lithosphere rheology, Geology,
18, 430–434, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Flemming, B. W.: Geology, Morphology, and Sedimentology of Estuaries and
Coasts, Treatise on Estuaries and Coasts, 3, 7–38, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Frieling, D., Mazumder, R., and Reichenbacher, B.: Tidal sediments in the
Upper Marine Molasse (OMM) of the Allgäu area (Lower Miocene,
Southwest-Germany), Neues Jahrb. Geol.
P.-A., 254, 151–163, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Froitzheim, N., Schmid, S. M., and Frey, M.: Mesozoic paleogeography and the
timing of eclogite-facies metamorphism in the Alps: A working hypothesis,
Eclogae Geol. Helv., 89, 81–110, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Fry, B., Deschamps, F., Kissling, E., Stehly, L., and Giardini, D.: Layered
azimuthal anisotropy of Rayleigh wave phase velocities in the European
Alpine lithosphere inferred from ambient noise, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 297, 95–102, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Füchtbauer, H.: Sedimentpetrographische Untersuchungen in der
älteren Molasse nördlich der Alpen, Eclogae Geol. Helv.,
61, 157–298, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Garefalakis, P. and Schlunegger, F.: Link between concentrations of
sediment flux and deep crustal processes beneath the European Alps,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17182-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17182-8</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Haldemann, E. G., Haus, H. A., Holliger, A., Liechti, W., Rutsch, R. F., and
Della Valle, G.: Geologischer Atlas der Schweiz, Blatt 1188 Eggiwil (Nr.
75): Schweizerische Geologische Kommission, scale 1&thinsp;:&thinsp;25&thinsp;000, 1 sheet, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Hammer, B.: Sedimentologie der Oberen Meeresmolasse im Raum St. Gallen,
unpublished Diploma thesis, Univ. Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 96 pp., 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Handy, M. R., Schmid, S. M., Bousquet, R., Kissling, E., and Bernoulli, D.:
Reconciling plate-tectonic reconstructions of Alpine Tethys with the
geological – geophysical record of spreading and subduction in the Alps,
Earth Sci. Rev., 102, 121–158, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Handy, M. R., Ustaszewski, K., and Kissling, E.: Reconstructing the
Alps-Carpathians-Dinarides as key to understanding switches in subduction
polarity, slab gaps and surface motion, Int. J. Earth
Sci., 104, 1–26, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Herwegh, M., Berger, A., Baumberger, R., Wehrens, P., and Kissling, E.:
Large-scale crustal-block-extrusion during Late Alpine collision, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 7, 413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00440-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00440-0</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Hilgen, F. J., Lourens, L. J., Van Dam, J. A.,  Beu, A. G., Boyes, A. F., Cooper, R. A., Krijgsman, W., Ogg, J. G., Piller, W. E., and Wilson, D. S.: Chapter 29 – The Neogene Period, edited by: Gradstien, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., and Ogg, G. M., The Geologic Time Scale, Elsevier, 923–978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00029-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00029-9</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Homewood, P. and Allen, P. A.: Wave-, Tide-, and Current-Controlled
Sandbodies in Miocene Molasse, Western Switzerland, Am. Assoc.
Petr. Geol. B., 65, 2534–2545, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Homewood, P., Allen, P. A. and Williams, G. D.: Dynamics of the Molasse Basin
of western Switzerland, Spec. Publs int. Ass. Sediment., 8, 199–217,
1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Hurford, A. J.: Cooling and uplift patterns in the Lepontine Alps, south
central Switzerland and an age of vertical movement on the Insubric fault
line, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 93, 413–427, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Isler, A. and Murer, R.: Geologische Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1149
Wolhusen 1&thinsp;:&thinsp;25&thinsp;000, Karte 164, Bundesamt für Landestopographie swisstopo,  Bern,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, J., Aigner, T., Luterbacher, H. P., Bachmann, G. H., and Müller, M.:
Sequence stratigraphy and depositional history in the south-eastern German
Molasse Basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 12, 929–940, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Jordan, T. E.: Thrust loads and foreland basin evolution, Cretaceous,
western United States, AAPG Bull., 65, 2506–2520, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Jordan, T. E. and Flemings, P. B.: Large-scale stratigraphic architecture,
eustatic variation, and unsteady tectonism: A theoretical evaluation.
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 96, 6681–6699, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Jost, J., Kempf, O., and Kälin, D.: Stratigraphy and palaeoecology of
the Upper Marine Molasse (OMM) of the central Swiss Plateau, Swiss J.
Geosci., 109, 149–169, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kälin, D. and Kempf, O.: High-resolution stratigraphy from the
continental record of the Middle Miocene Northern Alpine Foreland Basin of
Switzerland, N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 254, 177–235, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Keller, B.: Fazies und Stratigraphie der Oberen Meeresmolasse (Unteres
Miozän) zwischen Napf und Bodensee, PhD, Bern, 302 pp., University of Bern, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Keller, B.: Wirkung von Wellen und Gezeiten bei der Ablagerung der Oberen
Meeresmolasse–Löwendenkmal und Gletschergarten–zwei anschauliche
geologische Studienobjekte, Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft
Luzern, 31, 245–271, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O.: Magnetostratigraphy and facies evolution of the Lower Freshwater
Molasse (USM) of eastern Switzerland, PhD, Bern, 138 pp., University of Bern, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O. and Matter, A.: Magnetostratigraphy and depositional history of
the Upper Freshwater Molasse (OSM) of eastern Switzerland, Eclogae
Geol. Helv., 92, 97–103, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O., Bolliger, T., Kälin, D., Engesser, B., and Matter, A.: New
magnetostratigraphic calibration of Early to Middle Miocene mammal biozones
of the North Alpine foreland basin, Mém. Trav. EPHE Inst. Montpellier,
21, 547–561, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Kempf, O., Matter, A., Burbank, D. W., and Mange, M.: Depositional and
structural evolution of a foreland basin margin in a magnetostratigraphic
framework: the eastern Swiss Molasse basin, Int. J. Earth
Sci., 88, 253–275, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Kissling, E. and Schlunegger, F.: Rollback orogeny model for the evolution
of the Swiss Alps, Tectonics, 37, 1097–1115, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J.: Post-collisional sediment budget of circum-Alpine basins
(Central Europe), Mem. Sci. Geol. Padova, 52, 1–91, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J. and Kempf, O.: Post-Eocene evolution of the North Alpine
Foreland Basin and its response to Alpine tectonics, Sediment. Geol.,
152, 45–78, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J., Frisch, W., Dunkl, I., Sze ìkely, B., and Spiegel, C.:
Miocene shifts of the drainage divide in the Alps and their foreland basin,
Z. Geomorphol. N. F.,  45, 239–265, 2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J., Frisch, W., Dunkl, I., and Székely, B.: Quantifying
tectonic versus erosive denudation by the sediment budget: The Miocene core
complexes of the Alps, Tectonophysics, 330, 1–23, 2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlemann, J., Frisch, W., Székely, B., Dunkl, I., and Kázmér,
M.: Post-collisional sediment budget history of the Alps: tectonic versus
climatic control, Int. J. Earth Sci., 91,
818–837, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Kühni, A. and Pfiffner, O. A.: The relief of the Swiss Alps and
adjacent areas and its relation to lithology and structure: topographic
analysis from a 250-m DEM, Geomorphology, 41, 285–307, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Leclair, S. F. and Bridge, J. S.: Quantitative interpretation of sedimentary
structures formed by river dunes, J. Sediment. Res., 71,
713–716, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Lemcke, K., Engelhardt, W. V., and Füchtbauer, H.: Geologische und
sedimentpetrographische Untersuchungen im-Westteil der ungefalteten Molasse
des süddeutschen-Alpenvorlandes, Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch, 11,
1–182, 1953.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Lihou, J. C. and Allen, P. A.: Importance of inherited rift margin structures
in the early North Alpine Foreland Basin, Switzerland, Basin Res., 8,
425–442, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Lippitsch, R., Kissling, E., and Ansorge, J.: Upper mantle structure beneath
the Alpine orogen from high-resolution teleseismic tomography, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 2376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002016</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Lourens, L. J., Hilgen, F. J., Laskar, J., Shackleton, N. J., and Wilson, D.:
The Neogene Period. A Geologic Time Scale 2004, Cambridge University Press,
409–440, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, G., Winkler, W., Rahn, M., von Quadt, A., and Willett, S. D.: Evaluating
igneous sources of the Taveyannaz formation in the Central Alps by detrital
zircon U–Pb age dating and geochemistry, Swiss J. Geosci.,
111, 399–416, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Malzer, O., Rögl, F., Seifert, P., Wagner, L., Wessely, G., and Brix, F.:
Die Molassezone und deren Untergrund. Erdöl und Erdgas in
Österreich, 281–322, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Mancktelow, N.: The Simplon Line: a major displacement zone in the western
Lepontine Alps, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 78, 73–96, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Mancktelow, N. S. and Grasemann, B.: Time-dependent effects of heat
advection and topography on cooling histories during erosion,
Tectonophysics, 270, 167–195, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Matter, A.: Sedimentologische Untersuchungen im östlichen Napfgebiet
(Entlebuch–Tal der Grossen Fontanne, Kt. Luzern), Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 57, 315–429, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Matter, A., Homewood, P., Caron, C., Rigassi, D., van Stuijvenberg, J.,
Weidmann, M., and Winkler, W.: Flysch and Molasse of western and central
Switzerland, Exc. Guidebook No. 126A, 26th Int. Geol. Congr. Schweiz.
Geol. Komm. Wepf and Co. Publ., Basel, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Mazurek, M. Hurford, A., and Leu, W.: Unravelling the multi-stage burial history of
the Swiss Molasse basin: Integration of Apatite fission track, vitrinite
reflectance and biomarker isomerisation analysis, Basin Res., 18,
27–50, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Mein, P.: Résultats du groupe de travail des vertébrés:
Biozonation du Néogène méditerranéen à partir des
Mammifères, in: Report on Activity of RCMNS Working Groups (1971–1975), 77–81, edited by: Sénès, J., IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy, Subcommission on Neogene Stratigraphy, Vertebrata, Bratislava, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Mein, P.: Rapport d'activité du Groupe de Travail Vertébrés
Mise à jour de la biostratigraphie du Néogène basée sur les
Mammifères, Ann. géol. Pays Héilen., Tome hors série, 3,
1367–1372 (VII International Congress on Mediterranean Neogene, Athens,
1979), 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Mein, P.: Updating of MN zones, in:
European Neogene mammal chronology. NATO ASI, Life Sci. 180, edited by: Lindsay, E., Fahlbusch, V., and Mein, P.,  Plenum
Press, New York, 73–90, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Miall, A. D.: Lithofacies types and vertical profile models in braided river
deposits, a summary, in:  Fluvial sedimentology, edited by:  Miall, A. D., Can.
Soc. Petr. Geol. Mem., 5, 597–604, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Miall, A. D.: Architectural-Element Analysis: A New Method of Facies
Analysis Applied to Fluvial Deposits, Earth-Sci. Rev., 22, 261–308, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Miall, A. D.: The Geology of Fluvial Deposits. Sedimentary Facies, Basin
Analysis, and Petroleum Geology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 582 pp., 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, M. C. and Komar, P. D.: Oscillation Sand Ripples Generated by
Laboratory Apparatus, J. Sediment. Res., 50, 173–182,
1980a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, M. C. and Komar, P. D.: A field investigation of the relationship
between oscillation ripple spacinng and the near-bottom water orbital
motions, J. Sediment. Res., 50, 183–191, 1980b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, K. G., Mountain, G. S., the Leg 150 Shipboard Party, and Members of
the New Jersey Coastal Plain Drilling Project: Drilling and dating New
Jersey Oligocene–Miocene sequences: Ice volume, global sea level, and Exxon
records, Science, 271, 92–94, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, K. G., Mountain, G. S., Browning, J. V., Kominz, M., Sugarman, P. J.,
Christie-Blick, N., Katz, M. E., and Wright, J. D.: Cenozoic global sea level,
sequences, and the New Jersey transect: results from coastal plain and
continental slope drilling, Rev. Geophys., 36, 569–601, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Nichols, P. G.: Sedimentology &amp; Stratigraphy, Blackwell Sci., 355 pp.,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Ortner, H., Fügenschuh, B., Zerlauth, M., and Hinsch, R.: Geometry, sequence and amount of thrusting in the Subalpine Molasse of Austria and Bavaria, in: Fragile Earth: Geological Processes from Global to Local Scales and Associated Hazards, edited by: Friedrich, A., Hofmann, F., and Neumeier, G., GV-GSA joint meeting, Abstracts and Programs, 4–7 September 2011, Munich, A35, Boulder, Geological Society of America, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Pfiffner, O. A.: Evolution of the north Alpine foreland basin in the Central
Alps. Special Publication, Int. As. Sed., 8,
219–228, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Pfiffner, O. A., Schlunegger, F., and Buiter, S. J. H.: The Swiss Alps and
their peripheral foreland basin: Stratigraphic response to deep crustal
processes, Tectonics, 6, 1054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002TC001465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002TC001465</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Pippèrr, M. and Reichenbacher, B.: Late Early Miocene
palaeoenvironmental changes in the North Alpine Foreland Basin,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 468, 485–502, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, N. H. and Keller, B.: Distal alluvial deposits in a foreland basin
setting – the Lower Freshwater Miocene), Switzerland: sedimentology,
architecture and palaeosols, Sedimentology, 39, 545–565, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Python, C.: Geologische Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1185 Fribourg
1&thinsp;:&thinsp;25&thinsp;000, Bundesamt für Landestopographie swisstopo, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Reichenbacher, B., Krijgsman, W., Lataster, Y., Pipperr, M., Van Baak, C.
G., Chang, L., Kälin, D., Jost, J., Doppler, G., Jung, D., Priet, J.,
Abdul Aziz, H., Böhme, M., Garnish, J., Kirscher, U., and Bachtadse, V.:
A new magnetostratigraphic framework for the Lower Miocene
(Burdigalian/Ottnangian, Karpatian) in the North Alpine Foreland Basin,
Swiss J. Geosci., 106, 309–334, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Reichenwallner, S.: Die vulkanische Aktivität in den Westalpen
hergeleitet aus detritischem Amphibol und Klinopyroxen im
Taveyannaz-Sandstein, unpublished Ms thesis, University of Bern, Bern, 57 pp., 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Reineck, H. E. and Singh, I. B.: Depositional sedimentary environments,
Springer, 549 pp., 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Rust, B. R. and Gibling, M. R.: Braidplain evolution in the Pennsylvanian
South Bar Formation, Sydney basin, Noca Scotia, Canada, J.
Sediment. Petrol., 60, 59–72, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Salvermoser, S.: Zur Sedimentologie gezeiten-beeinflusster Sande in der
Oberen Meeresmolasse und Süssbrackwassermolasse (Ottnangium) von
Niederbayern und Oberösterreich, Münchner Geologische Hefte A, 26,
1–179, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Sant, K. V., Palcu, D., Mandic, O., and Krijgsman, W.: Changing seas in the
Early–Middle Miocene of Central Europe: a Mediterranean approach to
Paratethyan stratigraphy, Terra Nova, 29, 273–281, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Schaad, W., Keller, B., and Matter, A.: Die Obere Meeresmolasse (OMM) am
Pfänder: Beispiel eines Gilbert-Deltakomplexes, Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 85, 145–168, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Shanmugam, G.: Deep-marine tidal bottom currents and their reworked sands
in modern and ancient submarine canyons, Mar. Petroleum Geol., 20, 471–491, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F. and Castelltort, S.: Immediate and delayed signal of slab
breakoff in Oligo/Miocene Molasse deposits from the European Alps,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 31010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31010</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F. and Kissling, E.: Slab rollback orogeny in the Alps and
evolution of the Swiss Molasse basin, Nat. Commun., 6, 8605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9605</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F. and Willett, S.: Spatial and temporal variations in
exhumation of the central Swiss Alps and implications for exhumation
mechanisms, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ.,
154, 157–179, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Burbank, D. W., Matter, A., Engesser, B., and Mödden,
C.: Magnetostratigraphic calibration of the Oligocene to Middle Miocene
(30–15&thinsp;Ma) mammal biozones and depositional sequences of the Swiss Molasse
Basin, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 89, 753–788, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Leu, W., and Matter, A.: Sedimentary Sequences, Seismic
Facies, Subsidence Analysis, and Evolution of the Burdigalian Upper Marine
Molasse Group, Central Switzerland, AAPG Bull., 81, 1185–1207, 1997a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Jordan, T. E., and Klaper, E. M.: Controls of erosional
denudation on foreland basin evolution: The Oligocene central Swiss Molasse
Basin as an example, Tectonics, 16, 823–840, 1997b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Slingerland, R., and Matter, A.: Crustal thickening and
crustal extension as controls on the evolution of the drainage network of
the central Swiss Alps between 30&thinsp;Ma and the present: constraints from the
stratigraphy of the North Alpine Foreland Basin and the structural evolution
of the Alps, Basin Res., 86, 717–750, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Melzer, J., and Tucker, G.: Climate, exposed source-rock
lihtologies, crustal uplift and surface erosion: a theoretical analysis
calibrated with data from the Alps/North Alpine Foreland Basin system,
Int. J. Earth Sci., 90, 484–499, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Schlunegger, F., Anspach, O., Bieri, B., Böning, P., Kaufmann, Y., Lahl,
K., Lonschinski, M., Mollet, H., Sachse, D., Schubert, C., Stöckli, G.,
and Zander, I.: Geologische Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1169
Schüpfheim 1&thinsp;:&thinsp;25&thinsp;000, Bundesamt für Landestopographie swisstopo,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Pfiffner, O. A., Froitzheim, N., Schönborn, G., and
Kissling, E.: Geophysical-geological transect and tectonic evolution of the
Swiss-Italian Alps, Tectonics, 15, 1036–1064, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Fügenschuh, B., Kissling, E., and Schuster, R.: Tectonic
map and overall architecture of the Alpine orogen, Eclogae Geol.
Helv., 97, 93–117, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D.: Plan-view curvature of foreland basins and its
implications for the palaeostrength of the lithosphere underlying the
western Alps, Basin Res., 8, 173–182, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D.: Flysch to molasse transition in peripheral foreland
basins: The role of the passive margin versus slab breakoff, Geology,
25, 1123–1126, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D. and Allen, P. A.: Vertical versus horizontal motions in the
Alpine orogenic wedge: stratigraphic response in the foreland basin, Basin
Res., 4, 215–232, 1992.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Sinclair, H. D., Coakley, B. J., Allen, P. A., and Watts, A. B.: Simulation of
foreland basin stratigraphy using a diffusion model of mountain belt uplift
and erosion: An example from the Central Alps, Switzerland, Tectonics, 10,
599–620, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Spicher, A.: Tectonic Map of Switzerland, Schweizerische Geologische
Kommission, Basel, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Strunck, P. and Matter, A.: Depositional evolution of the western Swiss
Molasse, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 95, 197–222, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Tesauro, M., Kaban, M. K., and Cloething, S. A. P. L.: How rigid is Europe's
lithosphere?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–6, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Tesauro, M., Kaban, M. K., and Cloething, S. A. P. L.: Global model for the
lithospheric strength and effective elastic thickness,  Tectonophysics, 602,
78–86, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Ustaszewski, K., Schmid, S.M, Fügenschuh, B., Tischler, M., Kissling, E.
and Spakman, W.: A map-view restoration of the Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaridic
system for the Early Miocene. Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 101 (Suppl. 1),
273–294, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Waschbusch, P. J.  and Royden, L. H.: Spatial and temporal evolution of
foredeep basins: lateral strength variations and inelastic yielding in
continental lithosphere, Basin Res., 4, 179–196, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Wanner, J., Gisler, C., Jost, J., Christener, F., and Ninck, T.: Geologische
Karte der Schweiz, Kartenblatt 1148 Sumiswald 1&thinsp;:&thinsp;25&thinsp;000, Karte 163, Bundesamt für
Landestopographie swisstopo, Bern,  2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P.: Structural evolution in the Aar Massif (HaslitaI transect):
Implications for midcrustal deformation, PhD, University of Bern, Bern, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P., Baumberger, R., Berger, A., and Herwegh, M.: How is strain
localized in a meta-granitoid, mid-crustal basement section? Spatial
distribution of deformation in the central Aar massif (Switzerland), J. Struct. Geol., 94, 47–67, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Willett, S. D.: Late Neogene erosion of the Alps: A climate driver?, Annu.
Rev. Earth  Pl. Sc., 38, 411–437, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Yalin, M. S.: Geometrical properties of sand waves, J.
Hydr. Div.-ASCE, 90, 105–119, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L. Thomas, E., and Billups, K.: Trends,
rhythms and aberrations in global climate 65&thinsp;Ma to present, Science, 292,
686–693, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
