Near-surface Palaeocene fluid flow, mineralisation and faulting at Flamborough Head, UK: new field observations and U-Pb calcite dating constraints

. We present new field observations from Selwicks Bay, NE England, an exposure of the Flamborough Head Fault Zone (FHFZ). We combine these with U-Pb geochronology of syn-to post-tectonic calcite mineralisation to provide absolute constraints on the timing of deformation. The extensional Frontal Fault zone, located within the FHFZ, was active at ca. 63 Ma, with protracted fluid activity occurring as late as ca. 55 Ma. Other dated tensile fractures overlap this timeframe, and also cross-cut earlier formed fold structures, providing a lower bracket for the timing of folding and compressional deformation. 15 The Frontal Fault zone acted as a conduit for voluminous fluid flow, linking deeper sedimentary units to the shallow sub-surface, potentially hosting open voids at depth for a significant period of time, and exhibiting a protracted history of fracturing and fluid-flow over several million years. Such fault-hosted fluid pathways are important considerations in understanding chalk reservoirs and utilisation of the sub-surface for exploration, extraction and storage of raw and waste materials. Most structures at Selwicks Bay may have formed in a deformation history that is simpler than previously interpreted, with a 20 protracted phase of extensional and strike-slip motion along the FHFZ. The timing of this deformation overlaps that of the nearby Cleveland Dyke intrusion and of regional uplift in NW Britain, opening the possibility that extensional deformation and hydrothermal mineralisation at Selwicks Bay are linked to these regional and far-field processes during the Palaeocene.

have the potential to act as significant channelways for the migration and storage of subsurface fluids such as water, hydrocarbons or geothermal fluids, and in carbonate aquifers, can also act as pathways for the development of larger dissolutional condiuts and cave systems.
The absolute timings of fracture opening and fault displacement are critical to understanding how subsurface fluid migration 35 evolves over time, and link individual fractures to the record of external tectonic deformation. Most sedimentary basins, whether ancient or currently active, lack direct chronological constraints on their structural history, and rely instead on the interpretation of stratigraphical and structural relations from field-data, or those imaged by geophysical means, e.g. seismic reflection data. Exposed faults can be directly dated if suitable geochronometers are preserved; recent methodological developments have broadened the range of such mineral chronometers. Clay minerals can be dated by K-Ar, Ar-Ar and Rb-40 Sr, but require fault gouge, and a meticulous analytical approach to generate robust dates (e.g. Viola et al., 2016). U-Th/He dating of hematite coatings (e.g. Ault et al., 2016), U-Th-Pb dating of hydrothermal monazite (Bergemann et al., 2018) and Re-Os dating of hydrothermal sulphides (e.g. Dichiarante et al., 2016) are promising techniques that are also of use for faults and fault-hosted mineralisation of the right composition. In this paper, we utilise U-Pb dating of vein-filling calcite. Calcite is an abundant material in brittle fractures and faults of wide-ranging host lithologies. It has been shown to be an effective 45 chronometer that can be linked to the timing of hydrothermal mineralization, fault slip and fold development (Roberts & Walker, 2016;Ring and Gerdes, 2016;Goodfellow et al., 2017;Nuriel et al., 2017Nuriel et al., , 2019Beaudoin et al., 2018;Hansman et al., 2018;Holdsworth et al., 2019Holdsworth et al., , 2020Parrish et al., 2018;Smeraglia et al., 2019;Roberts et al., 2020).
In ancient sedimentary basin systems worldwide, many episodes of uplift and deformation are a consequence of tectonic 50 inversion associated with the far-field effects of orogenesis. In the British Isles, the youngest of these events is the Cenozoic (Neogene) Pyrenean-Alpine orogeny, which is linked to major geological structures exposed across Southern Britain (e.g. Chadwick, 1993;Blundell, 2002;Parrish et al., 2018), but may also have led to deformation as far north as Yorkshire, and offshore in the Southern North Sea (Ziegler, 1989). Here we present data from the Flamborough Head Fault Zone (FHFZ), which forms the southern boundary to the Mesozoic Cleveland Basin, and to which there is no consensus as to the timing and 55 kinematic history. In this paper, we combine new field observations with U-Pb geochronology of calcite veins. Our dates present the first absolute timing constraints on deformation within the FHFZ, and are placed into context with new field observations pertinent to understanding the structural setting of associated fluid flow and fracture filling processes.

Geological Setting 60
The Mesozoic Cleveland Basin (Fig. 1a) located in East Yorkshire, northern England, has experienced inversion the timing of which is poorly constrained. It is generally attributed by most authors to distant effects of the Pyrenean-Alpine orogeny (e.g. Starmer, 1995). The Jurassic-Cretaceous basin fills are bounded to the north and south by complex fault zones. To the south, the FHFZ is an east-east striking zone of brittle faults, which separates the Cleveland Basin from the Market Weighton Block https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-73 Preprint. Discussion started: 6 May 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License.
to the south (Fig. 1a). Inland exposures of the fault zone are poor, and largely restricted to small quarries in Cretaceous chalk; 65 however, they can be mapped on the surface, and are visible on remotely sensed datasets (Farrant et al., 2015). In contrast, the coastline preserves excellent exposures of the faults and associated deformation. Flamborough Head (Fig. 1b) exposes several fault zones that have a complex structure and potentially a protracted history; these are the Bempton, Selwicks Bay, and Dykes End fault zones (Fig. 1b).

70
The FHFZ is an E-W zone of brittle faults exposed at the coast at Flamborough Head, and extending inland for 30 to 40 miles (see Fig. 1a, and Farrant et al., 2015). The fault zone is linked with the Vale of Pickering Fault Zone , and has also been referred to as the Howardian Hill-Flamborough Fault Belt (Starmer, 1995). To the east, the fault zone is truncated offshore by the Dowsing Fault Zone, which forms the western margin of the Sole Pit Basin. The deformation of the Cretaceous chalk rocks around Flamborough Head associated with some of the E-W faults has long been studied due to 75 the excellent and structurally complex exposures preserved here (e.g. Phillips, 1829;Lamplugh, 1895;Kent, 1974;1980;Peacock & Sanderson, 1994;Starmer, 1995Starmer, , 2008Starmer, , 2013Rawson & Wright, 2000;Sagi et al., 2016).
Previous geological constraints on the timing of fault movements within the FHFZ come from the interpretation of seismic reflection data and sedimentological and structural analyses of several key outcrops (Jeans, 1973;80 Starmer, 1995). The offshore seismic interpretation of  indicates the existence of both steep faults that cut underlying Permian and Carboniferous strata at depth, and listric faults that detach within the Permian Zechstein strata.
Faults on the northern and southern margins of the fault zone form a graben structure. Thickness changes of the Speeton Clay and Red Chalk have been interpreted as evidence that the northern fault zone (comprising the Bempton and Speeton faults; Fig. 1b) began in the early Cretaceous (Jeans, 1973;Neale, 1974;. Kirby and Swallow (1987) 85 concluded that an early stage of near-vertical normal faulting (early Cretaceous) produced the graben structure, which was then followed by a period of listric normal faulting, with both events occurring prior to the Late Cretaceous. Inversion of the former extensional structures, forming the 'Shatter Zones' at Bempton and Selwicks Bay, is inferred to have occurred at the end of the Cretaceous, and has been related to the more regional uplift, folding and inversion of the Cleveland Basin to the north forming amongst other structures, the Cleveland anticline (Fig. 1a, . 90 Peacock and Sanderson (1994) conducted a detailed investigation of the orientation and displacements of faults exposed around Flamborough Head, covering some 1340 individual structures. They interpret their data as indicating that sigma1 during faulting was sub-vertical, with extension occurring sub-horizontally in all directions, and that complex relationships existed between sigma2 and sigma3. Based on oblique-slip kinematics they suggested that a sub-horizontal sigma3 developed over 95 time in a dominantly NNW-SSE direction. These authors also briefly describe the existence of contractional structures, namely oblique or reverse displacements on some fault surfaces, with a NNW-SSE contraction direction. Brecciation and veining are https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-73 Preprint. Discussion started: 6 May 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License.
pervasive at Selwicks Bay, and Peacock and Sanderson (1994) tentatively suggest that both were related to the contractional event. They do not, however, present clear evidence for whether contraction preceded or followed extension. 100 Starmer (1995) produced a deformation history of the chalk at Selwicks Bay based on detailed mapping and structural analyses in onshore exposures of chalk; he describes four phases of deformation (D1 to D4). D1 produced folds with NNW-SSE axes and bedding plane-parallel shears, with an ENE-WSW to E-W compression direction. Subsequent D2 deformation was attributed to extension in an E-W direction, and the formation of tensional extensional fractures. D3 started with E-W directed flexure of the strata, and some strike-slip faulting. Once the folding had tightened, thrusts with top-to-the-S to -SSE shear sense 105 directions cut through the strata. Dextral shearing at the same time suggested an element of transpression alongside the dominant N-S compression. D4 was interpreted as a complex phase of extension-transtension, first with E-W extension allowing N-S structures to activate, and followed by a N-S component of extension. Starmer (1995)  that are a distinctive structural feature (the Frontal Faults of Starmer, 1995), related to folding and intense metre scale zones of intense veining and brecciation in the chalk wall rocks. These authors describe the damage zones associated with this set of faults (the Selwicks Bay 'Shatter Zone') and show that they are 4 to 5 m wide in the footwall, but less than 1 m wide in the hanging-wall. These brecciated damage zones are where the highest intensity of veining occurs forming a highly interconnected, braided network of tensile calcite-filled fractures. This study showed that fluid connectivity was much higher 120 in the damage zones of the faults (up to 60%) compared the surrounding protolith (less than 10%), i.e. that these faults unequivocally represented highly effective fluid conduits in the geological past.
Faÿ-Gomard et al. (2018) present a geochemical study of veining at Selwicks Bay, and describe a relative chronology of three different phases of calcite veining. They use clumped isotopes of carbonates to determine precipitation temperatures of ca. 125 60°C, and combined with carbon, oxygen and strontium isotope analyses, postulate that the fluids originate from the underlying Triassic Sherwood sandstone. These authors link the timing of veining to Late Cenozoic to Cenozoic basin inversion, suggesting veining may have occurred in a pulsed manner in occurrence with pulsed phases of inversion; although in their figure, they utilise the burial history curve of Emery (2016), correlating the veining with Oligocene-Miocene regional uplift.
130 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-73 Preprint. Discussion started: 6 May 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Mortimore (2019) revisited the stratigraphy of the chalk exposed at Selwicks Bay, providing new stratigraphic and sedimentological logs for exposures north and south of the Frontal Faults. Mortimore (2019) also re-evaluated both micro and macro-scale structures and sedimentological features exposed at Selwicks Bay, questioning whether many of those exposed are a result of syn-sedimentary slumping and downslope displacement, rather than being purely tectonic processes.

Methodology 135
Fieldwork focussed on examples of calcite mineralization associated with folds, fractures and faults in the well-exposed Selwicks Bay (Fig. 1c). The chalks here are amongst the youngest exposed in Yorkshire and include the older Burnham Chalk Formation (Upper Turonian to Coniacian) overlain by the younger Flamborough Chalk Formation (Santonian to Campanian) (see Whitham, 1993). Several samples of calcite mineralization were collected for U-Pb dating purposes, with additional material collected from some fracture fills in order to understand the geological context of fracture-filling processes. Thin 140 sections from these samples were studied optically in order to characterise the mineralogy, structural setting andwhere possiblethe sequence of fracture filling in each sample.
U-Pb geochronology was conducted at the Geochronology and Tracers Facility, British Geological Survey, UK. Samples were analysed using polished epoxy blocks/slabs. The instrumentation used was a New Wave Research 193UC excimer laser 145 ablation system fitted with a TV2 cell, coupled to a Nu Instruments Attom single collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The method follows that described in Roberts et al. (2017). Laser parameters were pre-ablation conditions of 150 µm static spots fired at 10 Hz with a fluence of ~8 J/cm 2 for 2 seconds, and ablation conditions of a 100 µm spot, fired at 10 Hz with a fluence of ~8 J/cm 2 for 30 seconds. A 60 second background is taken before every set of standardbracketed analyses, and a 5 second washout is left between each ablation. Data reduction uses the Time Resolved Analysis 150 function of the Nu Instruments Attolab software, and an excel spreadsheet. Isoplot v4 (Ludwig, 2011)  1.2 Ma, and the pooled result of ASH15D yields a lower intercept age of 2.88 ± 0.08 Ma.

Field observations and outcrop settings of samples
It is not our intention here to provide a detailed kinematic analysis of faulting in the region, instead, it is our objective to simply provide the context for our new U-Pb dates in terms of the general movement history of the fault zones and the associated hydrothermal mineralisation.
Three samples (NR1707, NR1708 and CJ1) come from the brecciated regions associated with a sub-parallel set of steeply northward dipping normal faults exposed at the south of Selwicks Bay ( Fig. 2a; the E-W 'Frontal Faults' of Starmer (1995), and the Intensely Brecciated Zone (IBZ) of Sagi et al. (2016). The combined displacement across these faults has been estimated as ~20 m based on stratigraphic offsets (Rawson and Wright, 2000;Mortimore, 2019), with downthrow to the north. 165 Either side of the fault zoneand particularly in the hangingwall regioncm-to m-scale drag folding of the beds in the chalks clearly demonstrates this sense of motion (Fig. 2a). The two faults separate a 4-5 m wide zone of highly calcite veined, variably misoriented and brecciated chalk (Fig. 2a-2d). The areas of breccia are highly variable in their developmentsome smaller examples up to 20 cm wide are fairly constant in thickness and are bounded by well-defined planar fracture surfaces (Fig. 2d), whilst others are more irregular, with diffuse margins, varying between a few cm to more than 1.5 m across. As noted by Sagi Another sample, NR1709 comes from an E-W steeply dipping tensile calcite vein in the heavily fractured natural pavement 175 close to the base of North Cliff (Fig. 1c). The structural setting of these veins is seen in the cliffs immediately along strike and to the west where a steeply S dipping normal fault with dip-slip slickenlines is seen offsetting an earlier low angle thrust fault with a cm-scale, close to tight southward verging antiform in its immediate hangingwall (Fig. 3a). Close to the beach at the base of the cliff, the E-W subvertical calcite veins are seen to be well developed in the immediate hangingwall of the normal fault and show a sense of obliquity consistent with the normal shear sense along the fault (Fig. 3b), suggesting that they are 180 the same age.
A final sample, NR1901 comes from a tight synformal fold some 40m N of the northern Frontal Fault (Fig. 1c). Here a metrescale, close to tight, southward verging antiform-synform pair is developed and is closely associated with at least two top-tothe-S low to moderately N dipping thrust faults (Fig. 3c). The exposed synformal fold hinge reveals bedding-parallel calcite 185 slickenfibres oriented at high angles, oblique to the fold hinge (Fig. 3d) consistent with the operation of oblique flexural slip processes during folding (e.g. Holdsworth et al., 2002). The age of the folds relative to the normal movements along the Frontal Faults is unclear as no clear mesoscale cross-cutting relationships are seen, but the folds and thrusts cross cut by the normal faults at North Cliff are identical in style to those at this last locality. Thus, it is suggested that the main phase of extensional displacement and hydrothermal calcite mineralisation associated with the Frontal Fault Zone likely post-dates an earlier phase 190 of generally top-to-the-S thrusting and folding.

Fracture fills and microstructure
The contractional and extensional phases of deformation seen in Selwicks Bay are associated with significantly different fault rocks and fracture fills.

Contractional structures
The earlier low angle thrusts and folds are typically marked by narrow (<5cm thick) zones of incohesive crush breccia and gouge ( Fig. 4a and 4b), with gouges often best developed where thrust faults interact with clay-rich 'marly' interbeds in the chalk. Local gouge injections <1mm thick are seen cutting the wall rocks adjacent to thrusts (Fig. 4b). Calcite mineralization is largely limited to the development of slickenfibres along exposed thrust planes (Fig. 4c) and bedding planes around metre-200 scale folds (Fig. 4d). These slickenfibres show widespread evidence for crack-seal textures and are locally cross cut by later veinlets of structureless sparry calcite (Fig. 4e-4f).

Extensional structures
The fracture fills associated with both the 'Frontal Fault zone of Starmer (1995)  predominantly fine to coarse-grained sparry calcite and commonly form as braided, up to 0.5 m wide zones of veins (e.g. Fig   2b) that resemble the "zebra rocks" described by Holland and Urai (2010) in low porosity limestones in Oman. Most individual veins have an average thickness of 1-2 mm, but the thickest can (locally) reach widths of up to 30 cm. Many veins are composite having more than one calcite fill with subtle differences in colour.

215
Breccia fills are mostly associated with the Frontal Fault zone. The majority are generally E-W to ENE-WSW trending, steeply dipping, with clasts dominated by chalk that are clearly derived from the host wall rocks, although differences in texture and colour of individual clasts relative to immediately adjacent wall rocks and other clasts indicate a degree of mixing and displacement from source. The breccias show every gradation from incipient crackle (Fig. 5a) through mosaic to chaotic textures (Figs 5b, c), with clasts becoming generally more rounded as the fill becomes chaotic (Woodcock & Mort, 2008). Generally, E-W trending calcite veins essentially identical to those seen in the wall rocks are seen to both cross-cut breccia as https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-73 Preprint. Discussion started: 6 May 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License.
well as being included as clasts in breccia or as earlier misoriented veins cross-cutting chalk clasts (Fig. 5b). This might suggest that calcite mineralization, breccia formation and cementation were broadly contemporaneous processes. Sample NR1707 in the current study is taken from a matrix cement, while NR1708 is from an earlier vein that cuts a chalk clast. Many veins are 230 composite having more than one calcite fill with subtle differences in colour; weathering on the foreshore reveals both ferroan calcite (stained red due to oxidation) and non-ferroan calcite (unstained) fills (Fig 5c, (Figs. 6a-d). These occur as sub-vertical features that both post-date and predate adjacent sub-parallel calcite veins (Figs. 6a and b, respectively) and in steeply inclined fissures that obliquely cross-cut adjacent veins (Fig. 6c). More rarely, irregular subhorizontal zones of fine marly sediment fill the lower part of fractures that cross-cut earlier calcite veins, whilst the upper part of the cavity is filled with later calcite (Fig. 6d). These 245 sediments are crudely bedded and represent geopetal structures that consistently young upwards wherever they are found.
Thin sections reveal that the majority of calcite veins are syntaxial and sparry (Fig. 7a). The marly breccias and sediment fills contain numerous fragments of wall rock chalk, earlier calcite vein fills and more exotic materials such as brown clays, chert, individual microfossils -including sponge spicules -and rounded grains of both quartz and glauconite ( Fig. 7b-d

Results
Tera-Wasserburg plots of the resulting U-Pb data are shown in Figure 8. NR1707 yielded a lower intercept date of 63.9 ± 2.6 Ma (MSWD = 2.1); this date is from seventeen spots from one crystal. NR1708 yielded a lower intercept date of 63.4 ± 5.3 Ma (MSWD = 1.8); this date results from a traverse of one crystal comprising forty-nine spots. CJ1 is from a localised region 270 of one large calcite crystal, towards its base; sixty-one spots yielded a date of 54.9 ± 3.1 Ma (MSWD = 1.5). NR1709 yielded a lower intercept date of 56.2 ± 8.2 Ma (MSWD = 1.6 Ma); this result was obtained from two crystals, comprising fifty-one spots in total. Two domains of NR1901 were calculated separately. The first domain comprising thin (<200 µm) layers of slickenfibre calcite yielded no reasonable date, as the data are dominated by common lead (see supplementary file). The second domain comprising a cross-cutting veinlet yielded a date of 58.8 ± 1.9 Ma (MSWD = 1.4); this date is from seventy-three 275 spots. The five successful dates provide a spread in crystallisation of nine million years, although taking uncertainties into account, this may be as small as three million years. The three samples from the Frontal Fault (NR1708, NR1709, CJ-1) do not overlap when considering their age uncertainties, indicating a protracted period of fluid-flow of several Myrs.

The timing of deformation at Selwicks Bay 280
The dates obtained from the five samples yield constraints on the timing of deformation at Selwicks Bay. NR1707 and NR1708 are inferred to directly date the extensional phase of deformation along the Frontal Fault zone (and FHZF) as they are from regions of calcite veining and cemented collapse breccias. These samples provide overlapping ages of 63.9 and 63.4 Ma. CJ1 is also from the Frontal Front zone, but yields a younger age of 54.9 Ma that is outside of analytical uncertainty of the breccia samples. This younger date is from a relatively late large vuggy fracture fill. We cannot be certain whether this younger date 285 reflects a regionally later fracture opening event, but there are no clear field or thin section relationships observed to suggest this. NR1709 has a large uncertainty, overlapping both the breccia and younger vuggy calcite from the Frontal Fault. The date indicates that fracture opening at the northern part of Selwicks Bay overlaps that of the Frontal Fault in the southern part of the bay. The dated late veinlet within sample NR1901 overlaps the dates of the other samples (except NR1707). Since this veinlet cross-cuts the slickenfibre growth, this date provides a lower boundary for the timing of the folding and associated 290 cocontractional/transpressional deformation. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-73 Preprint. Discussion started: 6 May 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License.

Implications for chalk-hosted fluid-flow
Chalk is an important aquifer for groundwater, particularly in parts of Britain and surrounding countries in Europe (e.g. Price, 1987;MacDonald and Allen, 2001). Chalk can also act as both reservoirs and seals for hydrocarbons (e.g. Hardman, 1982;Mallon & Swarbrick, 2008). As such, the timing and origin of fracture-hosted permeability is an important constraint on 295 understanding fluid-flow through chalk.
The Frontal Fault zone structure at Selwicks Bay represents a significant damage zone associated with normal faulting in the region. This fault zone forms part of the FHFZ, but has much less offset than other fault-zones to the north (Bempton Fault) and south (Langtoft Fault) (Fig. 1a-1b). It is clear, however, that the large fissure systems forming the fault zone have acted as is an increasingly recognised phenomenon in near surface fracture systems (< 1-2km depth; e.g. Wright et al. 2009;Walker et al., 2011;Holdsworth et al. 2019Holdsworth et al. , 2020.

310
The fault has acted as a 'fluid superhighway' connecting deeper reservoir units (Triassic sandstones) with the surface during the latest Cretaceous-earliest Palaeocene. The existence of a fluid conduit of this kind potentially has major implications for storage and migration processes associated with reservoirs, whether they be for groundwater or hydrocarbons. Importantly, this structure is potentially of sub-seismic scale, indicating that even sub-seismic features may host large-scale fluid-flow, and produce significant conduits that exhibit high permeability over protracted time periods lasting millions of years. We also point 315 out that this is just one small fault of many in the FHFZ, and that many of the faults exposed inland are also associated with extensive veining, as well as secondary cementation of the chalk adjacent to the faults. These secondary cements form hard chalk zones, which then potentially act as barriers to fluid-flow.

Implications for regional tectonics
The Flamborough Head Fault Zone forms a structural boundary that separates the Cleveland Basin to the north, and the Market 320 Weighton Block to the south Starmer, 1995). The history of the fault zone is thought to be influenced by the subsidence and later inversion of the Cleveland Basin, whilst the Market Weighton Block remained high and stable (Kent, 1980). The Flamborough Head Fault Zone is truncated to the east by several intersecting deformation zones (Central zone (see Fig. 1 and Ford et al., 2020). The deformation that led to the formation and inversion of these basins has a long 325 history extending from the Permo-Triassic to the Miocene (e.g. Starmer, 1995 and references therein), and the far-field stress associated with their formation may have some relevance to the Flamborough Head Fault Zone. The histories of these offshore regions are only constrained by seismic and borehole data, and correlation with known regional events. Therefore, dating of onshore structures such as those presented in the current study provides additional and new absolute timing constraints on the structural evolution at a regional scale. 330 There have been long-standing differences in the interpretations of the structural complexity of deformation in the Flamborough Head region. Some prefer a polyphase deformation sequence over a protracted time period from the later Cretaceous to Neogene times (e.g. Starmer, 1995 and references therein) whilst others favour a somewhat simpler regime involving shorter-lived periods of strike-slip tectonics and polymodal, possibly polygonal extensional faulting (e.g. Peacock 335 & Sanderson, 1994;Sagi et al., 2016, Faÿ-Gomord et al., 2017. Our findings show that a regionally significant extensional phase of deformation occurred over a protracted period during very latest Cretaceous to early Eocene times (ca. 64-55 Ma). We suggest that this represents the youngest phase of deformation seen along the Frontal Fault zoneand by inference the FHFZ -post-dating any contractional or transpressional deformation. 340 It should be noted that we cannot rule out that fluid-flow and tensile fracturing may have extended to even younger dates than our study implies. Interestingly, this timing of deformation overlaps but is broadly younger than the estimated late Cretaceous timing of widespread inversion and tectonic events across parts of NW Europe, discussed by Mortimore (2018).
The age ranges for calcite mineralization overlap almost exactly with the timing of igneous activity in W Scotland and Northern 345 Ireland related to mantle upwelling activity forming the British Paleogene Igneous Province (Jolley & Bel, 2002), and associated regional uplift (Lewis, 2002;Nadin et al., 1997). In this regard, a clear geological link exists given the presence of the nearby Cleveland Dyke, the easternmost exposure of which lies some 30 km NW of Selwicks Bay (Fig 1a). The intrusion of this dykewhich can be traced across a wide region of northern Britain, is thought to be ca. 58-55 Ma based on K-Ar dating (Fitch et al., 1978;Evans et al., 1973). Our findings open up the possibility that that extension and associated fluid flow in the 350 Flamborough Head region are related to the far field influence of N Atlantic opening processes.
Our findings further suggest that folding and thrusting of the chalk at Flamborough Head must be older than ca. 64 Ma. Given the Santonian to Campanian age of the youngest chalk affected by deformation (ca. 86-72 Ma;Whitham, 1993;Mortimore, 2019), this implies that the inversion event can be no older than latest Cretaceous. In previous interpretations, much of the late 355 stage compressional deformation along the FFHZ has been linked to inversion related to the far-field effects of the Alpine orogeny during the Neogene (Starmer, 1995). Clearly, our findings from Selwicks Bay cast significant doubt on this model. It seems possible that the earlier folding and thrusting seen at Selwicks Bay and elsewhere around Flamborough Head is related https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-73 Preprint. Discussion started: 6 May 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License.
to a phase of strike-slip deformation along the FHFZ. Based on our findings to date, we cannot rule out the possibility that these strike-slip events overlap with the later extensional deformation, i.e. they are all manifestations of a protracted phase of 360 regional transtensional tectonics in latest Cretaceous to Palaeocene times. Thickness changes in the chalk around the faults exposed at Flamborough Head (see Mortimore, 2019 and references therein), are the only evidence for extensional deformation earlier than our oldest date of 64 Ma.
We propose that a reassessment of the deformation structures and sequences in the onshore and offshore regions around 365 Flamborough head is required, ideally with further absolute dating and palaeostress inversion analyses. More generally, our findings are a further illustration that the sequence, timing and tectonic significance of the Cenozoic history of the British Isles may be in need of some reassessment (e.g. see discussion in Parrish et al., 2018). Code and data availability.
U-Pb data presented in the Supplement Table, along with the corresponding methods and analytical details in the Supplement Text.

Supplement.
The supplement related to this article is available online at:

Author contributions.
NMWR and JKL collected the analytical data. NMWR, AF, JKL, CJ and REH conducted fieldwork and sample collection. 395 NMWR, JKL and REH conducted sample imaging and petrography. All authors contributed to writing the paper.

Competing interests.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial support.
This research has been supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/S011587/1). View looking S of exposed synformal fold hinge shown in (c) with bedding-parallel calcite slickenfibres oriented oblique to the fold hinge.