<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-13-137-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Creep of CarbFix basalt: influence of rock–fluid interaction</article-title><alt-title>Creep of CarbFix basalt</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Creep of CarbFix basalt}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T. Xing et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>Tiange</given-names></name>
          <email>tiange@mit.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-936X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Ghaffari</surname><given-names>Hamed O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Mok</surname><given-names>Ulrich</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Pec</surname><given-names>Matej</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2712-8445</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Tiange Xing (tiange@mit.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>January</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>137</fpage><lpage>160</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e105">Geological carbon sequestration provides permanent
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> storage to mitigate the current high concentration of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the atmosphere. CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization in basalts has been proven to be one
of the most secure storage options. For successful implementation and future
improvements of this technology, the time-dependent deformation behavior of
reservoir rocks in the presence of reactive fluids needs to be studied in
detail. We conducted load-stepping creep experiments on basalts from the
CarbFix site (Iceland) under several pore fluid conditions (dry,
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O saturated and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturated) at temperature,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and effective pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MPa,
during which we collected mechanical, acoustic and pore fluid chemistry
data. We observed transient creep at stresses as low as 11 % of the
failure strength. Acoustic emissions (AEs) correlated strongly with strain
accumulation, indicating that the creep deformation was a brittle process in
agreement with microstructural observations. The rate and magnitude of AEs
were higher in fluid-saturated experiments than in dry conditions. We infer
that the predominant mechanism governing creep deformation is time- and
stress-dependent subcritical dilatant cracking. Our results suggest that
the presence of aqueous fluids exerts first-order control on creep
deformation of basaltic rocks, while the composition of the fluids plays
only a secondary role under the studied conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e215">The concentration of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has seen a significant increase
over the last century, raising concerns about the more frequent occurrence
of extreme weather, sea-level rise and the projected increase of average
global temperature (Broecker, 1975). It is estimated that
about 800 Gt CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> will need to be stored by the end of the century to
keep the global temperature increase below 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C compared to
pre-industrial levels (National Academies of
Sciences, Engineering, 2019). Such large volumes can practically be stored
in the subsurface. Geological carbon sequestration (GCS) by in situ carbon
mineralization is recognized as one of the most secure, long-term storage
solutions (Gislason
and Oelkers, 2014; Kelemen and Matter, 2008; Lackner et al., 1995; Mani et
al., 2008; Seifritz, 1990; Snæbjörnsdóttir et al., 2020; Tutolo
et al., 2021). To date, several pilot projects have been launched to study
GCS in basalt reservoirs, including the CarbFix program in Iceland
(Callow
et al., 2018; Gislason et al., 2010; Oelkers et al., 2008;
Snæbjörnsdóttir et al., 2018) and the Wallula basalt (part of
Columbia River Basalt Group) sequestration project in Washington, USA (McGrail
et al., 2006, 2011, 2017; Zakharova et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e245">GCS involves the injection of fluids, either supercritical CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in an aqueous solution, into the formations. Basalts are composed
of mafic minerals such as pyroxene ((Mg,Fe)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>),
plagioclase ((Ca,Na)Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.70</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Si<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and olivine
((Mg,Fe)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as mafic glass, which react with CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to form carbonate minerals (MgCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, FeCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, etc.),
thus binding the injected CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in mineral structure (Gislason
and Hans, 1987; Hangx and Spiers, 2009; Matter et al., 2007; Oelkers et al.,
2008). Carbonation reactions appear to be rapid in natural conditions; more
than 95 % of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> injected into the CarbFix site in Iceland was
converted to carbonate minerals in less than 2 years
(Matter et al., 2016). Relevant fluid and
mineral reactions can be formulated as follows (Hangx
and Spiers, 2009; Hansen et al., 2005; Kelemen and Matter, 2008; Oelkers et
al., 2008):</p>
      <?pagebreak page138?><p id="d1e394"><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>Dissociation:


              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>Dissolution:

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M31" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaAl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Precipitation:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.R6" content-type="numbered reaction"><label>R6</label><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is dissolved in water to form an acidic solution (Reactions R1–R2). The
rocks dissolve to liberate divalent cations (Reactions R3–R5), which, upon saturation
in the fluid, precipitate as carbonate minerals (Reaction R6) further downstream
from the injection site.</p>
      <p id="d1e824">The mechanical and transport behavior of rocks can be significantly affected
during GCS by the interaction between rock and fluid, both from a mechanical
as well as chemical perspective (Baud et al., 2000; Dunning and Miller, 1985; Heard, 1960; Helmons et al.,
2016; Rutter and Hackston, 2017). The mechanical effect of pore fluid is
readily accounted for by using the effective pressure law
(Terzaghi, 1943). The pore fluid acts against the normal stresses
acting on crack surfaces, hence reducing the shear stress necessary to
overcome internal friction of the rocks. An increase in pore pressure during
injection can trigger seismicity, and therefore pore pressure has to be
carefully monitored (Atkinson et al.,
2020; Guglielmi et al., 2015). In addition to this mechanical effect, a
number of chemical processes can occur in the presence of reactive fluids,
leading to complex coupling between processes. For example, the replacement
of mafic minerals with carbonates can result in an up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 % increase in solid molar volume (Goff and
Lackner, 1998; Hansen et al., 2005; Kelemen and Matter, 2008) potentially
clogging pore space, reducing permeability and increasing pore pressure.
Alternatively, this volume expansion can generate stresses causing
reaction-induced fracturing, which provides additional fluid pathways and
maintains porosity and permeability for the reaction to proceed (Iyer
et al., 2008; Jamtveit et al., 2009; Kelemen and Matter, 2008; Lambart et
al., 2018; Macdonald and Fyfe, 1985; Renard et al., 2020; Rudge et al.,
2010; Skarbek et al., 2018; Xing et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2016). The
fracturing behavior itself is affected by the fluid chemistry via kinetic
reduction of fracture energy due to fluid absorption on mineral surfaces and
crack tip blunting (Baud et
al., 2000; Orowan, 1944; Rutter, 1972; Scholz, 1968), and activation of
fluid-promoted stress corrosion processes such as subcritical crack growth
resulting in time-dependent deformation, which is the focus of this paper (Anderson
and Grew, 1977; Atkinson, 1984; Atkinson and Meredith, 1987; Brantut et
al., 2013; Nara et al., 2013; Rice, 1978).</p>
      <p id="d1e835">This time-dependent deformation, often called “brittle creep” or “static
fatigue”, has been observed in all types of rocks tested to date (Atkinson
and Meredith, 1987; Brantut et al., 2012; Heap et al., 2011; Kranz et al.,
1982; Robertson, 1960; Scholz, 1968; Zhang et al., 2012). During brittle
creep, flaws such as microcracks contained in natural rocks are
subcritically stressed and propagate slowly due to stress corrosion (a
chemical weakening process) at crack tips in the presence of fluids.
Sample-scale fracture then occurs after some time delay when the cracks
coalesce and reach a critical length. As a result, the rocks lose their
load-bearing capabilities and fail along a macroscopic fault plane at stresses
well below their short-term strength  (Scholz, 1972).
For the sake of simplicity, we will use “creep” in the following text to refer
to this brittle creep deformation.</p>
      <p id="d1e838">It has been shown by experiments, observations and modeling that stress
corrosion is the dominant mechanism of subcritical crack growth in rocks
under upper crustal conditions (Brantut
et al., 2012; Michalske and Freiman, 1983; Reber and Pec, 2018). Brittle
creep deformation can be accelerated due to changes in the rate of stress
corrosion induced by the chemistry of the injected fluids (Renard et al., 2005, 2020)
or decelerated by crack tip blunting due to fluid interaction
(Scholz, 1968). Overall, it is hypothesized that changes in
stress corrosion crack growth rate due to a change in fluid chemistry will
be reflected in similar changes of the macroscopic creep strain rate, either
accelerating or decelerating based on the details of the ongoing dissolution–precipitation reactions (Brantut et
al., 2013). Hence, the effect of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich fluids needs to be quantified
for GCS applications.</p>
      <p id="d1e850">To summarize, the influence of rock–fluid interaction on deformation is
complicated and includes the coupled effects of mineral dissolution and
precipitation, kinetics of fluid-assisted deformation and injection pressure
buildup, finally resulting in time-dependent rock deformation. Carbonation
changes the bulk composition of the basalts, alters their strength and pore
structure, and affects the permeability of the rocks (Dunkel
et al., 2017; Kanakiya et al., 2017; Kelemen et al., 2013; Kelemen and Hirth,
2012; Lisabeth et al., 2017; Xing et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2016).
Understanding of the effects of rock–fluid interaction on deformation
requires dedicated laboratory studies with diverse fluid compositions at
in situ pressure conditions and at elevated temperatures acting over
extended timescales. The present study aims at elucidating the effect of
rock–fluid interaction on the time-dependent rock deformation by
investigating long-term creep of Icelandic basalt saturated with various fluid
compositions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Starting material and sample configuration</title>
      <p id="d1e868">We used Icelandic basalt drill cores from the CarbFix site, collected at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 m depth. The composition of Icelandic basalt has been
identified as tholeiite and contains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 wt % of calcium,
magnesium and iron oxides (7 wt %–10 wt % Ca; 5 wt %–6 wt % Mg; 7 wt %–13 wt % Fe)
with an average porosity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 % based on hydrological and
tracer recovery modeling (Alfredsson
et al., 2008, 2013; Aradóttir et al.,<?pagebreak page139?> 2012; Matter and Kelemen, 2009;
Snæbjörnsdóttir and Gislason, 2016). The rock is formed by an
aphanitic matrix that consists of crystals of feldspars, clinopyroxene,
olivine, glass and secondary alteration minerals as shown in Figs. 1 and
A1 in the Appendix. Our observations are consistent with previously reported petrographic
analysis which shows that the primary minerals of the Icelandic basalt are
predominantly plagioclase (An<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), olivine (Fo<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), clinopyroxene
(augite), magnetite–ilmenite and interstitial glass, alteration of the
basaltic lava flows commonly leads to smectite and zeolite precipitation (Alfredsson
et al., 2013; Larsson et al., 2002). The fraction of crystal-to-glass ratio
as well as crystal habitat is variable as documented in Fig. 1. Round
pores with a mean diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 mm are randomly
distributed throughout the matrix; some are filled with feldspar (primarily
potassium feldspar) and some are voids with no filling (Fig. 1). Pore walls, as
well as pre-existing crack walls, are coated by a thin layer of a
phyllosilicate, as documented in Fig. 1d and e. The matrix is locally
altered by dissolution of larger subhedral feldspar crystals and local
replacement by phyllosilicate (see Fig. 1b and e). Cylindrical samples
were ground to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 mm in diameter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 mm
in length (see Table 1). The samples were jacketed using copper foil of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 mm thickness, joined to titanium end caps by Viton
tubes and coated with Duralco 4538 epoxy. The end caps had a concentric hole
which allows fluid access to the sample. Figure 2 shows the schematics of
the sample configuration in this study. An internal force gauge was mounted
below the sample inside the vessel, allowing direct measurement of the
differential stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Displacement of
the axial piston was measured externally using a linear variable
differential transformer (LVDT). Variations of the sample length were
measured using two internal LVDTs. Local axial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and radial strains
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the rock were measured using strain gauges affixed to the
copper jacket around the sample. Piezoelectric sensors were installed around
the sample for passive monitoring of acoustic emissions (AEs).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e998">Backscattered electron (BSE) images of the starting
material. Location of higher-magnification images is shown by yellow
rectangles. <bold>(a)</bold> Representative sample microstructure; the glassy matrix shows a
range of crystal content and habitat and is locally altered; the area where
energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis is conducted (see details in
Fig. A1) is marked by the dashed rectangle. <bold>(b)</bold> Another common
glassy matrix microstructure with finer, more homogenous crystals. <bold>(c)</bold> Detail
of altered matrix and pore wall. Note the black voids in the shape of subhedral
feldspar laths in the matrix. <bold>(d)</bold> Detail of patchy phyllosilicate alteration
and dendritic crystals in altered matrix. <bold>(e)</bold> High-magnification image of
dendritic crystals forming the matrix and phyllosilicate coating of the pore
wall. <bold>(f)</bold> High-magnification image of glassy matrix with homogenous small
crystals. <bold>(g)</bold> High-magnification image of dendritic crystals forming the
unaltered matrix and high-magnification image of the phyllosilicate
alteration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1029">Because of the variation in structure and composition of the natural
material and limited drill core material available, we adopted the
“stress-stepping” experimental procedures to study creep deformation
(Heap et
al., 2009; Lockner, 1993). This method allows several creep experiments to
be conducted on a single sample at different stress levels and minimizes the
issue of intersample variability (see details in Sect. 2.2).
Piezoelectric sensors allowing independent recording of compressional and
shear waves were fabricated with PZT-5A ceramics with thickness of 3 to 5 mm and resonance frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 kHz to 1 MHz. The
PZT-5A crystals were mounted on titanium spacers with one side concavely
curved to match the sample surface, thus providing protection of the sensing
crystals and optimal contact area. A backup element was epoxied to the back
of the sensor to minimize ringing. We also used analogue low-pass filters
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 kHz) compatible with the frequency range of the
employed PZT ceramics to reduce the electromagnetic interference (EMI)
effect. Data were collected using two combined four-channel universal serial bus
(USB) oscilloscopes, recording at 50 MS/s with a 12-bit resolution (TiePie
HS4-50). Using low-noise amplifiers (ITASCA-60dB), we carefully selected the
most sensitive sensor positions, preferably far from each other, as master
channels. The data collection system was set such that, if the master
channels detected a signal satisfying a sufficiently large signal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> noise
ratio in a moving time window, the event would be recorded in all channels.
We amplified the two master channels with a flat gain of 60 dB in a
frequency range of 50 kHz to 1.5 MHz. Frequencies from 1.5 to 15 MHz
were amplified nonlinearly, the gain decreasing exponentially from 52 to
37 dB with increasing frequency (Ghaffari et al., 2021; Ghaffari and
Pec, 2020). Considering the above limitations, the main frequency range of
the recording system was between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 and 500 kHz, although
other frequencies could be recorded due to the exponential nature of the
amplification filters.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1063"><bold>(a)</bold> Schematics of sample configuration. The whole sample
assembly and pore fluid actuators are enclosed in a servo-controlled heating
system to ensure a uniform temperature condition. <bold>(b)</bold> Photo of the sample
assembly. <bold>(c)</bold> Illustration of the acoustic emission recording system.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experimental setup and analytical methods</title>
      <p id="d1e1088">All experiments were conducted at 50 MPa effective pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
pore fluid pressures, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of either 0 or 5 MPa for dry and
fluid-saturated experiments, respectively. The fluids used in this study
were H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluid is
prepared in the fluid mixing vessel (Fig. 2a) where deionized water is
saturated with CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the vessel under a gas pressure of 5 MPa. The
fluid-saturated samples were first immersed in deionized water under vacuum
for more than 30 d prior to the experiment. Details of the experimental
conditions are listed in Table 1. The samples were inserted in the NER
Autolab 3000 testing rig installed at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and deformed under triaxial
stress conditions, with the maximum principal stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) acting in
the axial direction. The radial principal stresses (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
were generated by the confining pressure, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effective pressure is calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During deformation, a constant pressure difference of 0.5 MPa was
maintained between the inlet and outlet of the pore pressure system, while
the mean pore pressure was kept at 5 MPa. We thus maintained fluid flow
across the sample and measured the permeability evolution during
deformation. In one H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiment (OR2_M),
we closed the fluid mixing vessel after the initial filling of the sample
and thus formed a closed pore fluid loop (OR2_M was referred
to as the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed experiment in the following discussion). In
the other H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiment (OR3_B), the pore
fluid system was connected to the fluid mixing vessel during the entire
experiment and therefore acted as a semi-open system since it was in
constant communication with a large CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source (OR3_B
was referred to as the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment in the following
discussion).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1380">Details of the sample parameters and experimental
conditions. Sample OR5 was not loaded to its failure strength due to early
failure of the strain gauges and LVDTs. Porosity is estimated from the X-ray
tomographic image of the sample. Initial porosity of the sample
OR3_B is not available due to limited access to the X-ray
tomography facility during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sample</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sample</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Confining</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Pore</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Effective</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Pore</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Temperature</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Young's</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Failure</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Strain at</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Initial</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">length</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">diameter</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">pressure</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pressure</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">pressure</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">fluid</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">modulus</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">strength</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">failure</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">porosity</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(mm)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(MPa)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(MPa)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(MPa)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">composition</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(GPa)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(MPa)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(%)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OR5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">77.37</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.32</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="3">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8" morerows="3">78</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OR2_T</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">72</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.71</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">11</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OR2_M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81.48</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.84</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OR3_B</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">77.94</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.81</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">28.0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">130</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page141?><p id="d1e1766">We started the experiments by bringing the sample to an effective pressure
of 50 MPa and subsequently to a temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C while holding the pressure constant. Heating the sample took
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 h, which was long enough to allow thermal equilibrium to be
reached. After reaching the desired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, the samples were
deformed using a step-loading procedure. During a step, the differential
stress was increased at a rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 MPa/min, which
corresponds to an axial strain rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Once the desired stress level was reached, we
kept the load constant for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 h, while monitoring the
sample deformation. This step sequence was repeated until failure of the
sample occurred – typically during the increase of differential stress. We
recorded the stress level at which the failure occurred as “failure
strength” and use this parameter to quantify the strength of the tested
material. We point out that the definition of “failure strength” used here
presents a lower bound for the commonly presented “ultimate strength” which
is measured in short-term, constant displacement rate deformation
experiments. The dry experiment is halted earlier due to failure of the
strain gauges and LVDTs and therefore the strength estimate is only a lower
bound of the failure strength. The total duration of the experiments ranged
between 5 and 12 d. Details of the load steps are summarized in the Appendix
(Fig. A2).</p>
      <p id="d1e1860">In this study, we focus on the transient creep evolution and only creep
steps where final failure is not observed are analyzed. We use the term
“phase I” to refer to the creep immediately following a stress change, during
which the creep strain evolves rapidly (i.e., relatively higher strain
rate). We call “phase II” the portion of the creep curve with an approximately
constant or very slowly varying strain rate over a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 h
window (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cte</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Figs. A3 and A4).
For comparison with previous work on brittle creep, we calculate a
characteristic creep strain rate using a least-squares fit to the slope of
the creep strain vs. time curve during the identified phase II transient
creep (Fig. A5; we will simply refer to it as “creep rate” in the
following discussion).</p>
      <p id="d1e1890">To investigate the microstructural changes occurring during deformation,
the rock samples were scanned before and after deformation using X-ray
computed tomography with scan parameters set at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 kV and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>A. The obtained X-ray images have a pixel size
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Thin sections were prepared
from selected samples and imaged using a field emission scanning electron
microscope (SEM).</p>
      <p id="d1e1938">The evolution of fluid composition was evaluated by collecting fluid samples
from the end of the pore fluid outlet (Fig. 2a) after each creep step. The
concentrations of Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the fluid sample were analyzed
using the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Creep deformation and creep strain rate</title>
      <p id="d1e1981">The creep deformation during each load step exhibited typical transient
creep evolution (Brantut et
al., 2013; Robertson, 1964; Scholz, 1968) with a transition from phase I,
where rapid straining occurs, to a slowly varying phase II, which exhibits an
approximately constant strain rate over our observation time (Fig. 3).
This transition generally took place within the first 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 h) of the loading step. In the dry experiment, large
variations in phase I creep strains were observed (Figs. 3a and 4c), and
the creep rates measured during the slowly evolving phase II stages showed a
neutral sensitivity to stress (Fig. 3e). In experiments where pore fluids
were present (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), the strain
accumulated during the phase I creep systematically increased with
increasing stress, and the creep strain rate during the phase II<?pagebreak page142?> creep
displayed a clear exponential dependence on stress (Fig. 3e). This stress
sensitivity of creep strain rate showed strong similarity in the different
experiments irrespective of the pore fluid composition and can be adequately
described by power-law (e.g., Atkinson,
1984; Meredith and Atkinson, 1983) as well as exponential functionals
(Charles and Hillig, 1962; Hillig, 2006), but
the exponential model seems to work slightly better with our data according
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value (see Fig. A6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2048"><bold>(a–d)</bold> Axial strain evolution of each individual stress
step for all experiments; <bold>(e)</bold> stress dependence of creep rate. The error bar
marks the 95 % confidence interval of each calculated creep rate. The
stress–creep rate relationship can be best modeled using an exponential law.
The dashed line and shaded area mark the 95 % confidence interval of the
fitted exponential relationship. The stress dependence of creep rate in the
dry experiment is considered neutral as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes low for the
fitting with negative slope. Color code of the plot follows the  same pattern as panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2079">In Fig. 4, we compare the strain accumulation during phase I and II of the
transient creep as illustrated in Fig. A4a. We observe a universal
power-law relationship of the accumulated creep strain during phase I
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to creep stain accumulated during phase II
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ii</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in all experiments irrespective of fluid presence or
the composition of the fluid (Fig. 4a); i.e., the ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ii</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains constant. The
accumulated creep strains during both phase I and phase II were
exponentially dependent on creep stress (Fig. 4c and d). In Fig. 4b, we
show that regardless of the creep stress level, the ratio between the
logarithmic accumulated phase I and logarithmic phase II creep strain after
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 h was approximately constant, except for two outliers
associated with two stress steps in the dry experiment, during which
anomalously large phase I creep strains occurred (Fig. 4a and c).</p>
      <p id="d1e2138">Overall, the fluid-saturated samples crept faster than the dry sample during
phase II stages in similar stress conditions. In spite of variations in
failure strength, the fluid-saturated samples consistently showed stronger
stress dependence of the creep rate than the dry sample. Comparing the
fluid-saturated experiments, we observe that the sample saturated with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
had the same creep rate as the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed experiment and a
higher creep rate than the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment under similar
stress level (Fig. 3e). Analysis of the fluid chemistry demonstrates that
the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O experiment show the same fluid
composition which we will describe in more detail in Sect. 3.6.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2237"><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between total phase I creep strain and
phase II creep strain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 h after the stress step loading.
The creep stress level is reflected by the size of the circles; <bold>(b)</bold> ratio
between the logarithmic total phase I and logarithmic phase II creep strain
remains constant and is independent of stress; the cumulated <bold>(c)</bold> phase I and
<bold>(d)</bold> phase II creep strain is exponentially dependent on the creep stress. The
fitted lines are calculated based on the data obtained from the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment (OR3_M).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Volumetric strain</title>
      <p id="d1e2298">In all experiments, creep deformation was initially compactive as indicated
by a positive change in the volumetric strain, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated from the
strain gauge measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Shear-enhanced dilation (Brace et al., 1966)
started 10–20 MPa before the failure strength of the sample was reached
(highlighted by yellow arrowheads in Fig. 5). The onset of dilation
generally occurred at a lower stress level in the fluid-saturated experiments
than in dry conditions. The largest dilation was observed in
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiments, as shown in Fig. 5d. In the dry
experiment, a large amount of dilation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) was
also observed at creep stress of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 105 MPa,
which is significantly higher than in other steps (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Furthermore, the dilation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 MPa is
also accompanied by a drop in stress (see Fig. 5). The strength of the
tested samples seems to be correlated with the elastic modulus measurements;
the stiffer the rock, the higher the strength (see Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2418">Plots of volumetric strain for <bold>(a)</bold> dry, <bold>(b)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
<bold>(c)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed and <bold>(d)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiments. The
onset of transition from compaction to dilatancy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is marked by the
yellow arrowhead. In the dry experiment, the differential stress exhibits
temporary fluctuation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 MPa (highlighted by the dashed
rectangle).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Permeability</title>
      <p id="d1e2529">In fluid-saturated experiments, permeability decreased with increasing
effective pressure during hydrostatic loading (Fig. 6a, b and c). The
largest decrease in permeability was observed in the water-saturated
experiment, where permeability dropped by 3 orders of magnitude as effective
pressure was raised from 15 to 50 MPa (Fig. 6a). Permeability reduction
was much lower in both H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments, only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1
order of magnitude, over the same effective pressure range (Fig. 6b, c).
Permeability variations after heating are shown in Fig. 6d, e and f,
where the minimum permeability reached during hydrostatic loading is
indicated for comparison (empty circles in Fig. 6d, e and f). The
permeability change during heating was rather small in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed experiment, while the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open
experiment exhibited more than an order of magnitude permeability reduction
after heating.</p>
      <p id="d1e2624">During creep, permeability did not evolve much with time but did show a
clear dependence with the stress level of the individual creep stages, first
slightly decreasing with increasing differential stress and then
substantially increasing when the onset of transition from compaction to
dilatancy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was passed, shortly before failure (Fig. 6d and f).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2643">Permeability evolution due to changes in
effective pressure <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> and  differential stress <bold>(d, e, f)</bold>. The dashed line marks the
onset of transition from compaction to dilatancy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as previously shown
in Fig. 4. The empty circle indicates the permeability measurement before
heating.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Characterization of the acoustic emissions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>3.4.1</label><title>Passive recording and rate of AEs</title>
      <p id="d1e2687">We observed a strong correlation between acoustic emissions and mechanical
data as documented in Fig. 7. The number and amplitude of AEs was
substantially larger in the experiments with pore fluids than in the dry
experiment, irrespective of fluid composition. The rate of AEs increased
during primary creep; the greater the accommodated strain was, the higher
the AE rate. The AE rate then decayed exponentially as the rock entered the
later stage of the transient creep. This decay was slower in all fluid-saturated
experiments where a significant amount of AE activity continued
during the phase II creep stage. The AE rate increased as the stress was
approaching the failure strength of the sample (Fig. 7). In Fig. 8, we
plot the normalized cumulative AE counts against the normalized creep strain
measured during each creep step. For all experiments with pore fluids, we
see that the data points tended to cluster near the 0–1 diagonal (Fig. 8b,
c and d), thus supporting a strong correlation between acoustic emissions
and creep strain. In the dry experiment, most AEs occurred early in each
load step (normalized strain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after which straining continued
with little AE activity (Fig. 8a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2702"><bold>(a, b, e, f)</bold> Plot of stress loading steps and strain (black) evolution. <bold>(c, d, g, h)</bold> Evolution of cumulative number of acoustic emission (AE)
and AE rate evolution (black) over time for <bold>(a, c)</bold> dry, <bold>(b, d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, e.g. H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed (note the short tertiary creep stage accompanied by a burst of AE activities during the last stress step; see insets) and <bold>(f, h)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiments.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2791">Plot of normalized cumulative AE count vs. strain <bold>(a)</bold> dry,
<bold>(b)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <bold>(c)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed and <bold>(d)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open
experiments. The normalized cumulative AE counts and strain during each
creep step show an approximately linear correlation in most cases, except in
the dry experiment.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page143?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>3.4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Gutenberg--Richter $b$ value}?><title>Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</title>
      <p id="d1e2888">The Gutenberg–Richter relationship provides a way to characterize the AE
statistics for each creep step. The Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value was calculated
using the following equation:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M188" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximal amplitude of individual acoustic events and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
number of events with magnitude larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 9 shows that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value increased with increasing stress in the fluid-saturated experiments
but remained constant in the dry experiment. The observed increases of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate that low-amplitude AEs had a proportionally larger
occurrence frequency with increasing stress.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2962">Differential stress dependence of Gutenberg–Richter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. See detailed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value fitting in Fig. A7. The error
bar marks the 95 % confidence interval of the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Microstructure</title>
      <p id="d1e3002">Post-mortem examination of the samples reveals that fractures inside the
fluid-saturated samples form a complex, wide system rather than a clearly
defined, distinct shear fault plane (Figs. 10 and A8). The
fluid-saturated samples exhibit bulging on the surface. In contrast, the dry
sample shows a weakly developed fault plane and less bulging; however, it
should be noted that this sample did not, in fact, reach failure strength.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3007"><bold>(a)</bold> Deformed sample from the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open
experiment (OR3_B). <bold>(b)</bold> Cross-sectional view of the deformed
sample. Top view of the sample <bold>(c)</bold> before and <bold>(d)</bold> after the experiment.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page144?><p id="d1e3053">X-ray tomographic images (Fig. 11) and BSE images (Fig. 12) of the
deformed samples display abundant fractures, whereas cracks are much more
rare in the pre-deformation CT scans and the BSE images (Fig. 1). The
amount of visible cracks in each sample tends to scale with the cumulative
AE count; the dry experiment has a lower fracture density than the
experiments with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> despite the fact that
the dry sample experienced a higher stress and accumulated a larger total
strain. To illustrate these observations, we selected
representative pairs of 2-D tomographic slices oriented parallel and
perpendicular to the loading direction and traced the observable microcracks
(Fig. 11). We quantified both the orientation and anisotropy of the
microcracks using the “surfor” method that relies on the projection of an
outline (Heilbronner and Barrett, 2014;
Panozzo, 1984). As documented in Fig. 11, cracks are strongly aligned in
the axial sections. The cracks are mainly oriented parallel to the maximum
principal stress in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> experiment, indicating Mode I
cracking, but are aligned 20–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the maximum
principal stress in the dry and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O experiments, suggesting mixed
Mode I <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Mode II cracking. A weaker alignment is generally observed in radial
sections.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3144">Orientation analysis of cracks in axial and radial
directions from X-ray tomographic images of the deformed sample from <bold>(a)</bold> dry,
<bold>(b)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <bold>(c)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed and <bold>(d)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open
experiments. The aspect ratio (min <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> max), which is defined by the ratio
between the minimum and maximum projection length of the cracks, is 1 when
the orientation is random (isotropic) (Heilbronner
and Barrett, 2014). Strong crack alignment is inferred in the axial sections
with aspect ratio of 0.5–0.7 compared to the radial sections
where the aspect ratio is 0.6–0.9.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3235">Microstructures of deformed sample from
the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment (OR3_B). Axial view,
loading from top and bottom. <bold>(a)</bold> Pervasively fractured matrix; note the
preferential N–S alignment of cracks indicating that most cracks are Mode I. Note
the collapse of void pores with cracks emanating (arrows). <bold>(b)</bold> Crack pattern
in altered glass matrix. <bold>(c)</bold> Close-up of <bold>(b)</bold>. Note the phyllosilicate coating
on the crack wall. <bold>(d–f)</bold> Magnification cascade illustrating the crack shape
and morphology in the deformed sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f12.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Fluid chemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e3293">Concentration of the Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cations increased once heating
started (Fig. 13). This increase in the Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration reflects the dissolution of Mg and Ca bearing minerals during
the reaction. In the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed experiment
(OR2_M), the supply of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was limited and led to a
dissolution-dominated system that resulted in the high concentration of
Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O experiment
(OR2_T). In the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment
(OR3_B), the cation concentration was significantly lower
than in the OR2_M and OR2_T experiments. This
was likely caused by the potential precipitation uptake due to the
continuous supply of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the semi-open setting of the pore fluid
system. This interpretation is also supported by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2
orders of magnitude drop in permeability observed in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open
experiment after heating started since precipitation could potentially clog
the pore throats and lead to permeability decrease.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e3465">Concentration of Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sampled
fluid from <bold>(a)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <bold>(b)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed
and <bold>(c)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiments. Time 0 marks the start of the first
creep stepping.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Active deformation mechanisms</title>
      <p id="d1e3584">Acoustic emission, microstructure analysis and mechanical data confirm that
the observed deformation is a brittle process as is expected at the given
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. The strong similarity between the time evolution of
cumulative AE counts and strain (Figs. 7 and 8) is consistent with
observations from other creep deformation experiments using cemented and
uncemented porous rocks (e.g.,
Brzesowsky et al., 2014; Heap et al., 2009). These considerations suggest
that the creep deformation observed in this study is a result of a
time-dependent brittle process such as subcritical cracking that can still
generate AE activity (Chester et al.,
2007, 2004).</p>
      <?pagebreak page145?><p id="d1e3601">Previous studies concluded that observable amount of brittle creep strain is
unlikely to occur below 80 % of ultimate strength defined by the
short-term, constant strain rate deformation experiments
(Baud and Meredith,
1997; Heap et al., 2009). However, all our strain measurements (strain
gauges, LVDTs, axial ram displacement) show that, in this study, creep did
occur at stress levels of only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 % of failure strength
(and therefore even lower percentage of the ultimate strength). Similar
creep deformation with measurable strain at low stress level has been
previously observed in shale (e.g., Mighani
et al., 2019). We also found that the strain rates measured during all creep
steps could be fitted using the same exponential law derived from strain
rate measurements. Furthermore, the amount of creep strain accumulated
during phase I and phase II showed a consistent stress dependence across all
stress conditions (Fig. 4c and d). Therefore, our experiments
demonstrated that there does not seem to exist a threshold below which no
creep strain will be observed. The creep deformation was likely governed by
the same mechanism across our tested stress conditions, and the accumulated
creep strain at a given time can be formulated as a function of stress.</p>
      <p id="d1e3611">Our AE statistics show that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were higher for the fluid-saturated
experiments than the dry experiment, indicating a higher proportion of
low-amplitude AEs (i.e., higher ratio of low- to high-amplitude events). This
abundance of low-amplitude events in fluid-saturated rock is a direct
evidence that aqueous fluids promoted creep deformation in basalt. As argued
in previous studies, growth of small cracks and low-amplitude events are
facilitated when stress corrosion is activated in the presence of aqueous
fluids (Hatton et al., 1993). We also
observed that the amplitude of the largest events increased with increasing
stress. And this effect becomes more significant in the fluid-saturated
experiments (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). This could be attributed to
the increase in microcrack nucleation, consequently maximizing the
likelihood of an “avalanche” of coalescing cracks, which, in turn, generates
large-amplitude events. Overall, as more and more energy is dissipated
through microcracking and the associated low-amplitude AEs, the macroscopic
deformation<?pagebreak page146?> becomes less dynamic, which is consistent with the increase in
the Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value with increasing stress.</p>
      <p id="d1e3663">Post-mortem examination of the fluid-saturated samples demonstrated the
presence of a complicated network of fractures within the sample and absence
of a well-defined major shear fracture plane. The samples also exhibited
distributed deformation features such as bulging, likely caused by the bulk
formation of dilation cracks in addition to the cataclastic shear during the
final failure. These microstructural observations further support the idea
that deformation during creep is diffuse and distributed rather than
localized (Hatton et
al., 1993; Heap et al., 2009), consistent with nucleation-controlled crack
growth since the nucleation sites are normally randomly distributed in the
sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e3667">Microstructure analysis of the deformed samples demonstrates that the
presence of fluid resulted in more abundant Mode I cracks (Fig. 11).
Larger amount of cracks oriented parallel to the maximum principal stress
were observed in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples, implying dominant Mode I
cracking, while the dry experiment showed less cracking, with the cracks
aligned 20–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to the maximum principal stress, thus pointing to
mixed Mode I <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Mode II cracking. This observation is consistent with
previous studies on strain localization, as they often proposed rock fracture
models predicting that Mode II cracking takes place during the localization
stage of fracture development (Lockner
et al., 1992; Reches and Lockner, 1994; Wong and Einstein, 2009). Among the
present experiments, the samples subjected to creep deformation under
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions exhibited the largest amount of Mode I
cracks. The sample deformed under dry condition, despite having experienced
similar differential stress and total accumulated strain, showed a lower
amount of cracks. As stated in previous studies, Mode II cracks often
propagate at velocities close to the Rayleigh velocity, which increases the
probability of occurrence of high-amplitude events. On the other hand,
Mode I cracks have significantly lower rupture velocities and tend to produce
low-amplitude acoustic events (Broberg, 2006). Therefore,
increased Mode I cracking should lead to an increase in the proportion of
low-amplitude AEs, i.e., an increase in the Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value.</p>
      <p id="d1e3744">We infer that the difference in creep rate of the dry and fluid-saturated
experiments is a result of fluid-assisted subcritical crack growth. The
fluid presence promotes stress corrosion, possibly related to hydrolytic
weakening (Atkinson, 1984), accelerates crack growth,
activates more crack nucleation sites and, consequently, leads to a
distributed array of small microcracks. In contrast, crack growth under dry
conditions is concentrated on fewer and larger cracks since activation of
the nucleation sites is more difficult. Thus, it is easier to create
localized deformation under dry condition.</p>
      <p id="d1e3747">Previous studies also suggested that intergranular pressure solution (IPS)
could play a significant role as a deformation mechanism during creep
(Liteanu
et al., 2012; Zhang and Spiers, 2005; Zhang et al., 2010). The creep
deformation by IPS involves dissolution and the presence of a fluid<?pagebreak page147?> phase
might be expected to affect creep deformation, generating additional strain
accumulation apart from dilatant cracking. Importantly, because the driving
process of IPS is not producing abrupt stress drops, it is not expected to
produce acoustic emissions. Although we did see difference in creep strain
between the dry and fluid-saturated experiments, it was likely caused by
dynamic fracturing, as evidenced by the volumetric strain and AE
observations (Figs. 5a and A1). We attribute the change in creep strain
rate between dry and fluid-saturated experiments to fluid-assisted
subcritical crack growth. We posit that under our experimental conditions,
IPS was not a dominant creep mechanism; however, more detailed
microstructural observations are needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Time- and stress-dependent deformation</title>
      <p id="d1e3758">Our experiments show that the time-dependent creep deformation was also
strongly stress dependent. We observed that the creep strain accumulated
during phase I was exponentially dependent on stress (Fig. 3c). Two
exceptions are noted in the dry experiment. Both showed high strain
accumulation during phase I transient creep and followed a sharp temporary
stress drop during the creep step with a nominal differential stress of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 MPa (Fig. 5). This temporary stress drop was
accompanied by a swarm of large-amplitude AEs (Fig. A2), implying
that the concurrent strong dilation was likely caused by local dynamic
fracturing while the bulk of the sample remained mostly intact and still
capable of supporting the applied load.</p>
      <p id="d1e3768">We also observed an exponential relationship between stress and creep rate.
Interestingly, the fluid-saturated experiments yielded approximately equal
stress sensitivities of the creep rates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, despite the variability in their
absolute strengths (Fig. 3). The exponential stress dependence of strain
rate in fluid-saturated experiments is consistent with brittle creep being
the dominant deformation<?pagebreak page148?> mechanism. Indeed, the values of the fitting
constant (0.02–0.03) are comparable in order of magnitude to
those reported in previous studies on other basaltic rocks (0.05 in Heap et al., 2011,
from experiments using Etna basalt). Since the creep rate was exponentially
dependent on stress, so should be the accumulated phase II creep strain.
This inference is supported by our observation in Fig. 4d. Concerning the
dry experiment, we attribute the slightly negative dependence of creep
strain rate on stress (Fig. 3e) to statistical artifact due to large
data fluctuations as suggested by the low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of the exponential
fitting (Fig. A6).</p>
      <p id="d1e3816">The fact that both cumulative phase I and phase II creep strains were
exponentially dependent on stress (Fig. 4c and d) implies a power-law
relationship between the accumulated phase I and phase II creep strain. This
power-law relationship (i.e., the ratio between the logarithmic total
phase I and logarithmic phase II creep strain), based on our experimental
observation, is independent of the stress level and even the presence or
absence of fluids. This empirical relationship can be formulated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M269" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ii</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cte</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total strain accumulated at the end of an
individual creep stage (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 h), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the creep
strain accumulated during phase I and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ii</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the strain
accumulated during phase II (see Fig. A5). This phenomenological
power-law relationship is supported by our observation that the ratios in
Eq. (2) were indeed approximately constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 (Fig. 4a
and b). This power-law relationship expressed in Eq. (2) implies that
the strain evolution with time can be predicted; some fundamental link
between strain accommodated in phase I creep and strain rate in phase II
creep exists.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page149?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Fluid chemistry evolution and influence of fluid composition</title>
      <p id="d1e3948">The increase in concentration of both Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> occurring
after heating in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed experiment
(Fig. 13) indicates that the system was dominated by dissolution of Mg- and
Ca-bearing minerals. In the case of the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment,
we observed a much smaller increase in cation concentration, implying that a
significant amount of the released Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cations reacted
with the continuously supplied CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the semi-open setting to form
carbonate precipitates. These cation concentration trends appeared strongly
correlated with the permeability evolution and creep strength of the rocks.
The experiment with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open showed a larger post-heating
permeability decrease than the experiments with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
closed and was stronger (Figs. 3e and 6). The absolute creep rate
was consistent for experiments with comparable fluid chemistry (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed) and about a factor of 3 faster than in the
experiment where precipitation was dominant (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open),
indicating that dissolution associated with fluid presence weakens the rock,
while precipitation reactions slightly strengthen the rock and partly
compensate the effect of dissolution. This congruence of observations is a
strong argument that precipitation occurred in the pore space of the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment. However, we could not directly resolve evidence
of precipitation within the resolution of our microstructural observations
and this requires further study. Interestingly, the strain rate sensitivity
to stress was similar in all fluid-saturated experiments (Fig. 3),
implying that creep rate sensitivity to stress was not significantly
influenced by the fluid chemistry.</p>
      <p id="d1e4198">Our chemical data support the idea that carbonation of basalt is a
kinetically favored reaction and are consistent with the fast rate of
carbonation observed during the CarbFix field tests
(Matter et al., 2016). We interpret the
difference between the Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations measured in
the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiment and those in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed experiments to be a result of the consumption of
Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the formation of carbonate. This indicates that
the supply of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is more sufficient in the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open
experiment and the rate-limiting factor during carbonation under our
experimental condition was the net supply of Mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
cations, which is associated with dissolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Permeability and porosity evolution</title>
      <?pagebreak page151?><p id="d1e4376">Permeability was affected by both chemical and mechanical processes. The
evolution of permeability during the experiments was generally consistent
with previous observations of monotonic permeability decrease during
hydrostatic loading of samples of limestone, sandstone and Etna basalt (Brantut,
2015; Fortin et al., 2011; Zhu and Wong, 1997). Comparison of the
dissolution dominated experiments (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed)
and the precipitation dominated experiment (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open) shows
that the carbonation reaction reduced permeability in our experiment. In low
differential stress conditions, the samples compacted and this compaction
was accompanied by a further permeability decrease, which was likely related
to the pore volume reduction expected during compressive deformation.
Shortly before failure strength was reached, volumetric dilation became
dominant and coincided with permeability increase. Our observations of the
permeability evolution demonstrate that, although the permeability might
decrease due to compaction, formation and propagation of cracks can
mitigate the permeability loss and even lead to an increase with further
cracking. The effect of creep deformation on the long-term permeability
evolution of reservoir rocks is therefore non-negligible. Increase in
permeability, combined with other observations such as increasing volumetric
strain and acoustic emissions, could potentially be used as a warning sign
for impending failure during the long-term monitoring of reservoirs'
integrity in GCS applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Effect of sample heterogeneity</title>
      <p id="d1e4448">As our samples are taken from drill cores collected at depth at the CarbFix
carbon mineralization site, the heterogeneity is larger than in rocks
typically used in rock mechanics experiments. The samples investigated in
this study exhibit variations in their initial porosity (5 %–15 %;
see Table 1), failure strength (55–130 MPa) and Young's modulus (12–28 GPa). We
observed a correlation between the failure strength and the elastic modulus
of the samples where stiffer samples reach higher peak strengths, consistent
with previous reports of an empirical relationship between the unconfined
compressive strength and the elastic modulus of sedimentary rocks
(see review in Chang et al., 2006).
The peak strength however varied inversely with porosity; the dry sample
(OR5), which has the highest initial porosity (15 %), shows a higher
failure strength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MPa) and exhibits the lowest creep rate
compared to the fluid-saturated experiments where porosity measurements were
available (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed). Remarkably, the stress
sensitivity of the creep strain rate shows consistency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in all the fluid-saturated experiments (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open and closed) in spite of these variations in
porosity, stiffness and failure strength. Moreover, the creep rate at
individual stress steps is consistent for experiments with comparable fluid
chemistry (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closed) despite a variation in
porosity by a factor of 2 in between the samples (Fig. 3 and Table 1).
These results are a strong argument for the operation of chemical processes
that contribute to creep. While variations in porosity resulted in variation
in peak strength, they did not seem to affect the absolute creep rates or
the sensitivity of creep rate to stress.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4594">Through the experimental study of long-term creep deformation of Icelandic
basalt, we have demonstrated the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4599">Transient creep occurred at stress levels as low as 11 % of the failure
strength.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4603">Presence of an aqueous pore fluid exerted first-order control on the creep
deformation of the basaltic rocks, while the fluid composition had only a
secondary effect under our experimental conditions. At similar differential
stress level, the creep rates in fluid-saturated experiments were much
higher than the rates in the dry experiment.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4607">A closed system tended to favor dissolution over precipitation during
carbonation in our experimental setting,<?pagebreak page152?> whereas precipitation played a more
important role in an open system with continuous CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supply.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4620">Larger amount of dilation was observed in fluid-saturated experiments than
in the dry experiment, as evidenced by both volumetric strain data and
microstructural observations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4624">Larger low- to high-amplitude ratios of the AE events and higher AE
rates were observed during the phase II creep of the fluid-saturated
experiments than the dry experiment, indicating that aqueous fluids promoted
stress corrosion processes.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4628">The mechanism governing the creep deformation was brittle, time and
stress dependent, and could likely be identified as subcritical dilatant
cracking.</p></list-item></list>
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?> Overall, our results emphasize the non-negligible role that the creep
deformation can potentially play in the long-term deformation of rocks even
under low-pressure and -temperature conditions and calls for more attention
to time-dependent processes such as subcritical microcracking in GCS
applications. Under our experimental conditions, the creep deformation and
the associated fracture development were affected by the presence of aqueous
fluids, implying that reactive fluids could potentially alter the fracture
patterns and allow mineralization in a greater rock volume during GCS
applications. Further detailed studies on the creep deformation under
chemically active environment are required to better understand the
long-term deformation of rocks in natural systems.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>A1</label><title>Sample composition</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e4654">Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the area
marked in Fig. 1; color composite images are made by combining RGB channel
where the individual channels contain element concentration. <bold>(a)</bold> Backscattered
electron (BSE) images of the starting material; <bold>(b)</bold> elemental
composition of Na, K and Ca; <bold>(c)</bold> elemental composition of Mg and Fe;
<bold>(d)</bold> elemental composition of Al and Si.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page153?><sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>A2</label><title>Experimental procedures</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e4687"><bold>(a)</bold> Differential stress vs. time plot of experiments
conducted at temperature of 78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The dry experiment (red) was
ceased before dynamic failure occurred in the sample. <bold>(b)</bold> A temporary stress
drop was observed (highlighted by the dashed rectangle in panel <bold>a</bold>) during the
primary creep of the dry experiment at a creep stress of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 MPa accompanied by the occurrence of high-amplitude AEs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>A3</label><title>Phase I to phase II transient creep transition</title>
      <p id="d1e4730">Selection of the phase II transient creep from the mechanical data is based
on the calculated strain rate using first derivative of the strain curve vs.
time at different stress levels (Fig. A2). The plot of strain rate vs.
strain further supported that the strain rate evolution slows down during
the identified phase II creep.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d1e4735">Strain rate evolution calculated from the first
derivative of the strain vs. time data. It can be observed that the strain
rates generally become constant at 10 000 s (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 h) after the load
stepping in most steps.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page154?><p id="d1e4753"><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>To consistently analyze the transition between phase I and phase II of the
transient creep, we fit the evolution of phase I creep strain over time
using a power-law function and the phase II creep strain as a linear
function (Fig. A3a). The measured strain data point that is the closest
to the intersection of the two fitting functions is selected as the
inflection point, i.e., the transition from phase I to phase II transient
creep deformation. Figure A3b and c show the logarithmic and power-law
fitting methods used for the time evolution of creep strain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the
24 h observation window of our experiment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F17"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d1e4767">Plot of strain rate evolution vs. strain.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F18"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A5</label><caption><p id="d1e4780">Illustration of the method used to pick up the transition
(circle) from phase I to phase II transient creep deformation. Two-phase
model for the time evolution of creep strain. The transition (circle) from
phase I to phase II creep deformation is selected based on the intersection
of the power-law fit function of phase I creep (red) and linear fit function
of the phase II creep (yellow).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f18.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page155?><sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS4">
  <label>A4</label><title>Creep strain–stress models</title>
      <p id="d1e4801">The strain rate during phase II creep deformation is generally described
using the power-law form (e.g., Atkinson,
1984; Meredith and Atkinson, 1983):
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>A1</label><mml:math id="M345" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          or the exponential form (e.g., Charles and Hillig,
1962):
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>A2</label><mml:math id="M346" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the creep strain and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the differential stress. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
are constants. Both models have described our laboratory data well. The
exponential model seems to be slightly better than the power-law model when
comparing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F19"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A6</label><caption><p id="d1e4917">Power-law (dashed line) and exponential (solid line) fit of
creep rate–stress relationship. The strain rates are calculated from strain
measurement from the main ram displacement (circle), strain gauge (triangle) and
LVDTs (square).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f19.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page156?><sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS5">
  <label>A5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Gutenberg--Richter $b$~value}?><title>Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</title>
      <p id="d1e4947">Figure A7 shows the fitting of the Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value from different
experiments at various stress levels.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F20"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A7</label><caption><p id="d1e4959">Statistics of AE amplitudes for Gutenberg–Richter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
calculation from <bold>(a)</bold> dry, <bold>(b)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <bold>(c)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
closed and <bold>(d)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f20.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS6">
  <label>A6</label><title>Samples after deformation</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F21"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A8</label><caption><p id="d1e5060">Photo of samples after deformation. The dry sample did
not reach the final dynamic failure before the experiment was halted.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f21.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS7">
  <label>A7</label><title>Elastic modulus</title>
      <p id="d1e5079">The Young modulus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the sample is calculated based on the strain
measurement during the elastic loading using the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M365" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the differential stress, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the displacement of main
ram piston, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the length of the sample.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F22"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A9</label><caption><p id="d1e5143">Elastic modulus calculated from strain vs. stress plots
from <bold>(a)</bold> dry, <bold>(b)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <bold>(c)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
closed and <bold>(d)</bold> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> open experiments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=256.074803pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/13/137/2022/se-13-137-2022-f22.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5231">The underlying data are available at <uri>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4926587</uri> (Xing et al., 2021).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5240">TX and MP designed the study. TX, HG and UM performed the experiments. TX and HG performed the data analysis. TX wrote the paper with input from all authors. MP obtained the funding of this study.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5246">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e5252">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5258">The authors benefited from discussions with Ben Holtzman, Yves Bernabé, Brian Evans, Bradford Hager and Brent Minchew. The authors would like to thank Yves Bernabé for his copy-editing of this paper. The authors would also like to thank Edward Boyle and Richard Kayser for their help with the ICP-MS analysis.  The X-ray tomographic images were obtained at the Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure Network (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF award no. 1541959. CNS is part of Harvard University. The cores used in this study were generously provided by Sandra Snæbjörnsdóttir and Kári Helgaso. The authors would like to thank Philip Benson and the anonymous reviewer for their constructive and detailed reviews, as well as the editor, David Healy, and Federico Rossetti for the handling of this paper.</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{8.2cm}}?><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5265">This research has been supported by the National Science Foundation (grant nos. EAR-1833478 and EAR-2054414), MITei's Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Center, and Scotiabank's Net Zero Research Fund.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5272">This paper was edited by David Healy and reviewed by Philip Benson and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alfredsson, H. A., Hardarson, B. S., Franzson, H., and Gislason, S. R.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
sequestration in basaltic rock at the Hellisheidi site in SW Iceland:
stratigraphy and chemical composition of the rocks at the injection site,
Mineral. Mag., 72, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alfredsson, H. A., Oelkers, E. H., Hardarsson, B. S., Franzson, H.,
Gunnlaugsson, E., and Gislason, S. R.: The geology and water chemistry of the
Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland carbon storage site, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con.,
12, 399–418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, O. L. and Grew, P. C.: Stress corrosion theory of crack
propagation with applications to geophysics, Rev. Geophys., 15, 77–104
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG015i001p00077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG015i001p00077</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aradóttir, E. S. P., Sonnenthal, E. L., Björnsson, G., and
Jónsson, H.: Multidimensional reactive transport modeling of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral
sequestration in basalts at the Hellisheidi geothermal field, Iceland, Int.
J. Greenh. Gas Con., 9, 24–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2012.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.IJGGC.2012.02.006</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Atkinson, B. K.: Subcritical crack growth in geological materials, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 89, 4077–4114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB06p04077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB089iB06p04077</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, B. K. and Meredith, P. G.: Fracture mechanics of rock- The Theory
of Subcritical Crack Growth with Applications t<?pagebreak page158?>o Minerals and Rocks, in:
Academic Press Geology Series, 111–166, ISBN 978-0-12-066265-4, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Atkinson, G. M., Eaton, D. W., and Igonin, N.: Developments in understanding
seismicity triggered by hydraulic fracturing, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 264–277,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0049-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-020-0049-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baud, P. and Meredith, P. G.: Damage accumulation during triaxial creep of
Darley Dale sandstone from pore volumometry and acoustic emission, Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min., 34, 24.e1–24.e10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00060-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00060-9</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baud, P., Zhu, W., and Wong, T.: Failure mode and weakening effect of water
on sandstone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 105, 16371–16389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jb900087</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brace, W. F., Paulding, B. W., and Scholz, C. H.: Dilatancy in the fracture
of crystalline rocks, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 3939–3953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/jz071i016p03939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/jz071i016p03939</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brantut, N.: Time-dependent recovery of microcrack damage and seismic wave
speeds in deformed limestone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120,
8088–8109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JB012324</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brantut, N., Baud, P., Heap, M. J., and Meredith, P. G.: Micromechanics of
brittle creep in rocks, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JB009299</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brantut, N., Heap, M. J., Meredith, P. G., and Baud, P.: Time-dependent
cracking and brittle creep in crustal rocks: A review, J. Struct. Geol.,
52, 17–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2013.03.007</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Broberg, K. B.: Differences Between Mode I and Mode II Crack Propagation,
Pure Appl. Geophys., 163, 1867–1879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-006-0101-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-006-0101-7</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Broecker, W. S.: Climatic change: Are we on the brink of a pronounced global
warming?, Science, 189, 460–463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4201.460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.189.4201.460</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brzesowsky, R. H., Hangx, S. J. T., Brantut, N., and Spiers, C. J.:
Compaction creep of sands due to time-dependent grain failure: Effects of
chemical environment, applied stress, and grain size, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 7521–7541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JB011277</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Callow, B., Falcon-Suarez, I., Ahmed, S., and Matter, J. M.: Assessing the
carbon sequestration potential of basalt using X-ray micro-CT and rock
mechanics, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 70, 146–156,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, C., Zoback, M. D., and Khaksar, A.: Empirical relations between rock
strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 51, 223–237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Charles, R. J. and Hillig, W. B.: The Kinetics of Glass Failure by Stress
Corrosion, in: Symposium on Mechanical Strength of Glass and Ways of
Improving It., Charleroi (Belgique),  1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chester, F. M., Chester, J. S., Kronenberg, A. K., and Hajash, A.:
Subcritical creep compaction of quartz sand at diagenetic conditions:
Effects of water and grain size, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B06203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JB004317</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chester, J., Lenz, S., Chester, F., and Lang, R.: Mechanisms of
compaction of quartz sand at diagenetic conditions, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 220, 435–451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00054-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00054-8</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dunkel, K. G., Austrheim, H., Renard, F., Cordonnier, B., and Jamtveit, B.:
Localized slip controlled by dehydration embrittlement of partly
serpentinized dunites, Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 463, 277–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.047</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dunning, J. D. and Miller, M. E.: Effects of pore fluid chemistry on stable
sliding of Berea sandstone, Pure Appl. Geophys., 122,
447–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00874611</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fortin, J., Stanchits, S., Vinciguerra, S., and Guéguen, Y.: Influence of
thermal and mechanical cracks on permeability and elastic wave velocities in
a basalt from Mt. Etna volcano subjected to elevated pressure,
Tectonophysics, 503, 60–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.028</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ghaffari, H. O. and Pec, M.: An ultrasound probe array for a high-pressure,
high-temperature solid medium deformation apparatus, Rev. Sci. Instrum.,
91, 085117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/5.0004035</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ghaffari, H. O., Mok, U., and Pec, M.: On calibration of piezoelectric
sensors with laser doppler vibrometer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 150, 2503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0006445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1121/10.0006445</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gislason, S. R. and Hans, P. E.: Meteoric water-basalt interactions. I: A
laboratory study, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 2827–2840,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90161-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(87)90161-X</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gislason, S. R. and Oelkers, E. H.: Carbon Storage in Basalt, Science, 344, 373–374, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1250828</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gislason, S. R., Wolff-Boenisch, D., Stefansson, A., Oelkers, E. H.,
Gunnlaugsson, E., Sigurdardottir, H., Sigfusson, B., Broecker, W. S.,
Matter, J. M., and Stute, M.: Mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide in
basalt: A pre-injection overview of the CarbFix project, Int. J. Greenh. Gas
Con., 4, 537–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goff, F. and Lackner, K. S.: Carbon dioxide sequestering using ultramafic
rocks, Environ. Geosci., 5, 89–101,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0984.1998.0a8014.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1526-0984.1998.0a8014.x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guglielmi, Y., Cappa, F., Avouac, J. P., Henry, P., and Elsworth, D.:
Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip, Science, 348, 1224–1226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aab0476</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hangx, S. J. T. and Spiers, C. J.: Reaction of plagioclase feldspars with
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under hydrothermal conditions, Chem. Geol., 265,  88–98,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.12.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.12.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hansen, L. D., Dipple, G. M., Gordon, T. M., and Kellett, D. A.: CARBONATED
SERPENTINITE (LISTWANITE) AT ATLIN, BRITISH COLUMBIA: A GEOLOGICAL ANALOGUE
TO CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION, Can. Mineral., 43, 225–239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gscanmin.43.1.225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gscanmin.43.1.225</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hatton, C. G., Main, I. G., and Meredith, P. G.: A comparison of seismic and
structural measurements of scaling exponents during tensile subcritical
crack growth, J. Struct. Geol., 15, 1485–1495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(93)90008-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8141(93)90008-X</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heap, M. J., Baud, P., Meredith, P. G., Bell, A. F., and Main, I. G.:
Time-dependent brittle creep in darley dale sandstone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006212" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JB006212</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heap, M. J., Baud, P., Meredith, P. G., Vinciguerra, S., Bell, A. F., and
Main, I. G.: Brittle creep in basalt and its application to time-dependent
volcano deformation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 71–82,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.035</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heard, H. C.: Chapter 7: Transition from Brittle Fracture to Ductile Flow in
Solenhofen Limestone as a Function o<?pagebreak page159?>f Temperature, Confining Pressure, and
Interstitial Fluid Pressure, in: Rock Deformation (A Symposium), Vol. 79, Geological Society of America, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM79-p193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/MEM79-p193</ext-link>,
ISBN
978-0-8137-1079-2, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heilbronner, R. and Barrett, S.: Image Analysis in Earth Sciences, Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-10343-8, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Helmons, R. L. J., Miedema, S. A., and van Rhee, C.: Simulating hydro
mechanical effects in rock deformation by combination of the discrete
element method and the smoothed particle method, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 86, 224–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.018</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hillig, W. B.: The C-H delayed failure mechanism revisited, Int. J. Fract.,
139, 197–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-0025-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10704-006-0025-3</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iyer, K., Jamtveit, B., Mathiesen, J., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., and Feder,
J.: Reaction-assisted hierarchical fracturing during serpentinization, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 267, 503–516, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.060</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jamtveit, B., Putnis, C. V., and Malthe-Sørenssen, A.: Reaction induced
fracturing during replacement processes, Contrib. Mineral. Petr.,
157, 127–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-008-0324-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00410-008-0324-y</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kanakiya, S., Adam, L., Esteban, L., Rowe, M. C., and Shane, P.: Dissolution
and secondary mineral precipitation in basalts due to reactions with
carbonic acid, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 122, 4312–4327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JB014019</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kelemen, P. B. and Hirth, G.: Reaction-driven cracking during retrograde
metamorphism: Olivine hydration and carbonation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
345–348, 81–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.018</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kelemen, P. B. and Matter, J. M.: In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
storage, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 17295–17300,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805794105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0805794105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kelemen, P. B., Savage, H. M., and Hirth, G.: Reaction-Driven Cracking During
Mineral Hydration, Carbonation and Oxidation, in: Poromechanics V, Vol. c,
823–826, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kranz, R. L., Harris, W. J., and Carter, N. L.: Static fatigue of granite at
200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Geophys. Res. Lett., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL009i001p00001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL009i001p00001</ext-link>, 9, 1–4, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lackner, K. S., Wendt, C. H., Butt, D. P., Joyce, E. L., and Sharp, D. H.:
Carbon dioxide disposal in carbonate minerals, Energy, 20, 1153–1170,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lambart, S., Savage, H. M., Robinson, B. G., and Kelemen, P. B.: Experimental
Investigation of the Pressure of Crystallization of Ca(OH) 2: Implications
for the Reactive Cracking Process, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 19, 3448–3458,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GC007609</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Larsson, D., Grönvold, K., Oskarsson, N., and Gunnlaugsson, E.:
Hydrothermal alteration of plagioclase and growth of secondary feldspar in
the Hengill Volcanic Centre, SW Iceland, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
114, 275–290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(01)00267-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0377-0273(01)00267-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lisabeth, H. P., Zhu, W., Xing, T., and De Andrade, V.: Dissolution-Assisted
Pattern Formation During Olivine Carbonation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
9622–9631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL074393</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liteanu, E., Niemeijer, A. R., Spiers, C. J., Peach, C. J., and De Bresser,
J. H. P.: The effect of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on creep of wet calcite aggregates, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008789</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lockner, D. A.: The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture,
Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 30, 883–899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lockner, D. A., Byerlee, J. D., Kuksenko, V., Ponomarev, A., and Sidorin, A.:
Observations of Quasistatic Fault Growth from Acoustic Emissions, Int.
Geophys., 51, 3–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(08)62813-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0074-6142(08)62813-2</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macdonald, A. H. and Fyfe, W. S.: Rate of serpentinization in seafloor
environments, Tectonophysics, 116, 123–135,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(85)90225-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(85)90225-2</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mani, D., Nirmal Charan, S., and Kumar, B.: Assessment of carbon dioxide
sequestration potential of ultramafic rocks in the greenstone belts of
southern India, Curr. Sci., 94, 53–60, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matter, J. M. and Kelemen, P. B.: Permanent storage of carbon dioxide in
geological reservoirs by mineral carbonation, Nat. Geosci., 2, 837–841,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo683</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matter, J. M., Takahashi, T., and Goldberg, D. S.: Experimental evaluation of
in situ CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-water-rock reactions during CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> injection in basaltic rocks:
Implications for geological CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sequestration, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001427</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Matter, J. M., Stute, M., Snaebjornsdottir, S. O., Oelkers, E. H., Gislason,
S. R., Aradottir, E. S., Sigfusson, B., Gunnarsson, I., Sigurdardottir, H.,
Gunnlaugsson, E., Axelsson, G., Alfredsson, H. A., Wolff-Boenisch, D.,
Mesfin, K., Taya, D. F. d.l. R., Hall, J., Dideriksen, K., and Broecker, W.
S.: Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic
carbon dioxide emissions, Science, 352, 1312–1314,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad8132</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McGrail, B. P., Schaef, H. T., Ho, A. M., Chien, Y. J., Dooley, J. J., and
Davidson, C. L.: Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in flood
basalts, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JB004169</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McGrail, B. P., Spane, F. A. A., Sullivan, E. C., Bacon, D. H., and Hund, G.:
The Wallula basalt sequestration pilot project, Enrgy. Proced., 4,
5653–5660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.557</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McGrail, B. P., Schaef, H. T., Spane, F. A., Horner, J. A., Owen, A. T.,
Cliff, J. B., Qafoku, O., Thompson, C. J., and Sullivan, E. C.: Wallula
Basalt Pilot Demonstration Project: Post-injection Results and Conclusions,
Enrgy. Proced., 114, 5783–5790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1716" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1716</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meredith, P. G. and Atkinson, B. K.: Stress corrosion and acoustic emission
during tensile crack propagation in Whin Sill dolerite and other basic
rocks, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 75, 1–21,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1983.tb01911.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.1983.tb01911.x</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Michalske, T. A. and Freiman, S. W.: A Molecular Mechanism for Stress
Corrosion in Vitreous Silica, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 66, 284–288,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb15715.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb15715.x</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mighani, S., Bernabé, Y., Boulenouar, A., Mok, U., and Evans, B.: Creep
Deformation in Vaca Muerta Shale From Nanoindentation to Triaxial
Experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 7842–7868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JB017524</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nara, Y., Yamanaka, H., Oe, Y., and Kaneko, K.: Influence of temperature and
water on subcritical crack growth parameters an<?pagebreak page160?>d long-term strength for
igneous rocks, Geophys. J. Int., 193, 47–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggs116</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Negative Emissions
Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda, National
Academies Press, Washington, D.C., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17226/25259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17226/25259</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oelkers, E. H., Gislason, S. R., and Matter, J. M.: Mineral carbonation of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Elements, 4, 333–337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.5.333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gselements.4.5.333</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Orowan, E.: The fatigue of glass under stress, Nature, 154, 341–343,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/154341a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/154341a0</ext-link>, 1944.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Panozzo, R. É.: Two-dimensional strain from the orientation of lines in
a plane, J. Struct. Geol., 6, 215–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(84)90098-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8141(84)90098-1</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reber, J. E. and Pec, M.: Comparison of brittle- and viscous creep in
quartzites: Implications for semi-brittle flow of rocks, J. Struct. Geol., 113, 90–99,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.05.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2018.05.022</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reches, Z. and Lockner, D. A.: Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle
rocks, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 99, 18159–18173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94jb00115</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Renard, F., Gundersen, E., Hellmann, R., Collombet, M., and Le Guen, Y.:
Numerical modeling of the effect of carbon dioxide sequestration on the rate
of pressure solution creep in limestone: Preliminary results, Oil Gas Sci.
Technol., 60, 381–399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2005023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2516/ogst:2005023</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Renard, F., Kandula, N., McBeck, J., and Cordonnier, B.: Creep Burst
Coincident With Faulting in Marble Observed in 4-D Synchrotron X-Ray Imaging
Triaxial Compression Experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2020JB020354,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JB020354</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rice, J. R.: Thermodynamics of the quasi-static growth of Griffith cracks,
J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 26, 61–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(78)90014-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-5096(78)90014-5</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Robertson, E. C.: Creep of Solenhofen Limestone Under Moderate Hydrostatic
Pressure, 227–244, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Robertson, E. C.: Viscoelasticity of rocks, State Stress Earth's Crust,
181–233, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rudge, J. F., Kelemen, P. B., and Spiegelman, M.: A simple model of
reaction-induced cracking applied to serpentinization and carbonation of
peridotite, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 291, 215–227,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.01.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2010.01.016</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rutter, E. H.: The influence of interstitial water on the rheological
behaviour of calcite rocks, Tectonophysics, 14, 13–33,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(72)90003-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(72)90003-0</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rutter, E. H. and Hackston, A.: On the effective stress law for rock-on-rock
frictional sliding, and fault slip triggered by means of fluid injection,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 375, 20160001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2016.0001</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scholz, C. H.: Mechanism of creep in brittle rock, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 3295–3302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i010p03295" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB073i010p03295</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scholz, C. H.: Static fatigue of quartz, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 2104–2114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB077i011p02104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB077i011p02104</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seifritz, W.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disposal by means of silicates, Nature, 345,
486–486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/345486b0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/345486b0</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skarbek, R. M., Savage, H. M., Kelemen, P. B., and Yancopoulos, D.:
Competition Between Crystallization-Induced Expansion and Creep Compaction
During Gypsum Formation, and Implications for Serpentinization, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 5372–5393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JB015369</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó. and Gislason, S. R.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Storage
Potential of Basaltic Rocks Offshore Iceland, Enrgy. Proced., 86, 371–380,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.038</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Gislason, S. R., Galeczka, I. M., and
Oelkers, E. H.: Reaction path modelling of in-situ mineralisation of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the CarbFix site at Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 220,
348–366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.053</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Sigfússon, B., Marieni, C.,
Goldberg, D., Gislason, S. R., and Oelkers, E. H.: Carbon dioxide storage
through mineral carbonation, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 90–102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Terzaghi, K.: Theoretical soil mechanics, Chapman And Hall, Limited,
London, ISBN 0471853054 9780471853053, 1943.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tutolo, B. M., Awolayo, A., and Brown, C.: Alkalinity Generation Constraints
on Basalt Carbonation for Carbon Dioxide Removal at the Gigaton-per-Year
Scale, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 11906–11915,
<uri>https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02733</uri>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, L. N. Y. and Einstein, H. H.: Systematic evaluation of cracking
behavior in specimens containing single flaws under uniaxial compression,
Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 46, 239–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.006</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xing, T., Zhu, W., Fusseis, F., and Lisabeth, H.: Generating porosity during olivine carbonation via dissolution channels and expansion cracks, Solid Earth, 9, 879–896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-879-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-9-879-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xing, T., Ghaffari, O. H., Mok, U., and Pec, M.:  Creep of Basalts Undergoing Carbonation: Effect of Rock-Fluid Interaction, Zenodo [data set],  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4926587" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4926587</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zakharova, N. V., Goldberg, D. S., Sullivan, E. C., Herron, M. M., and Grau,
J. A.: Petrophysical and geochemical properties of Columbia River flood
basalt: Implications for carbon sequestration, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 13, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GC004305</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. and Spiers, C. J.: Compaction of granular calcite by pressure
solution at room temperature and effects of pore fluid chemistry, Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min., 42, 950–960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.017</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Spiers, C. J., and Peach, C. J.: Compaction creep of wet granular
calcite by pressure solution at 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JB005853</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z. L., Xu, W. Y., Wang, W., and Wang, R. B.: Triaxial creep tests of
rock from the compressive zone of dam foundation in Xiangjiaba Hydropower
Station, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 50, 133–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.003</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, W. and Wong, T.: The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic
flow: Permeability evolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 3027–3041,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03282" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96jb03282</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, W., Fusseis, F., Lisabeth, H. P., Xing, T., Xiao, X., De Andrade, V.,
and Karato, S.: Experimental evidence of reaction-induced fracturing during
olivine carbonation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9535–9543,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL070834</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Creep of CarbFix basalt: influence of rock–fluid interaction</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alfredsson, H. A., Hardarson, B. S., Franzson, H., and Gislason, S. R.: CO<sub>2</sub>
sequestration in basaltic rock at the Hellisheidi site in SW Iceland:
stratigraphy and chemical composition of the rocks at the injection site,
Mineral. Mag., 72, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alfredsson, H. A., Oelkers, E. H., Hardarsson, B. S., Franzson, H.,
Gunnlaugsson, E., and Gislason, S. R.: The geology and water chemistry of the
Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland carbon storage site, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con.,
12, 399–418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.019</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, O. L. and Grew, P. C.: Stress corrosion theory of crack
propagation with applications to geophysics, Rev. Geophys., 15, 77–104
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG015i001p00077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG015i001p00077</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Aradóttir, E. S. P., Sonnenthal, E. L., Björnsson, G., and
Jónsson, H.: Multidimensional reactive transport modeling of CO<sub>2</sub> mineral
sequestration in basalts at the Hellisheidi geothermal field, Iceland, Int.
J. Greenh. Gas Con., 9, 24–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2012.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2012.02.006</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, B. K.: Subcritical crack growth in geological materials, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 89, 4077–4114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB06p04077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB06p04077</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, B. K. and Meredith, P. G.: Fracture mechanics of rock- The Theory
of Subcritical Crack Growth with Applications to Minerals and Rocks, in:
Academic Press Geology Series, 111–166, ISBN 978-0-12-066265-4, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, G. M., Eaton, D. W., and Igonin, N.: Developments in understanding
seismicity triggered by hydraulic fracturing, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 264–277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0049-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0049-7</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Baud, P. and Meredith, P. G.: Damage accumulation during triaxial creep of
Darley Dale sandstone from pore volumometry and acoustic emission, Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min., 34, 24.e1–24.e10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00060-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00060-9</a>,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Baud, P., Zhu, W., and Wong, T.: Failure mode and weakening effect of water
on sandstone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 105, 16371–16389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900087</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Brace, W. F., Paulding, B. W., and Scholz, C. H.: Dilatancy in the fracture
of crystalline rocks, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 3939–3953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/jz071i016p03939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/jz071i016p03939</a>, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Brantut, N.: Time-dependent recovery of microcrack damage and seismic wave
speeds in deformed limestone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120,
8088–8109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012324</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Brantut, N., Baud, P., Heap, M. J., and Meredith, P. G.: Micromechanics of
brittle creep in rocks, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009299</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Brantut, N., Heap, M. J., Meredith, P. G., and Baud, P.: Time-dependent
cracking and brittle creep in crustal rocks: A review, J. Struct. Geol.,
52, 17–43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.03.007</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Broberg, K. B.: Differences Between Mode I and Mode II Crack Propagation,
Pure Appl. Geophys., 163, 1867–1879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-006-0101-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-006-0101-7</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S.: Climatic change: Are we on the brink of a pronounced global
warming?, Science, 189, 460–463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4201.460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4201.460</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Brzesowsky, R. H., Hangx, S. J. T., Brantut, N., and Spiers, C. J.:
Compaction creep of sands due to time-dependent grain failure: Effects of
chemical environment, applied stress, and grain size, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 7521–7541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011277</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Callow, B., Falcon-Suarez, I., Ahmed, S., and Matter, J. M.: Assessing the
carbon sequestration potential of basalt using X-ray micro-CT and rock
mechanics, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 70, 146–156,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.008</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, C., Zoback, M. D., and Khaksar, A.: Empirical relations between rock
strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 51, 223–237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Charles, R. J. and Hillig, W. B.: The Kinetics of Glass Failure by Stress
Corrosion, in: Symposium on Mechanical Strength of Glass and Ways of
Improving It., Charleroi (Belgique),  1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Chester, F. M., Chester, J. S., Kronenberg, A. K., and Hajash, A.:
Subcritical creep compaction of quartz sand at diagenetic conditions:
Effects of water and grain size, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B06203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004317</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Chester, J., Lenz, S., Chester, F., and Lang, R.: Mechanisms of
compaction of quartz sand at diagenetic conditions, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 220, 435–451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00054-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00054-8</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dunkel, K. G., Austrheim, H., Renard, F., Cordonnier, B., and Jamtveit, B.:
Localized slip controlled by dehydration embrittlement of partly
serpentinized dunites, Leka Ophiolite Complex, Norway, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 463, 277–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.047</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Dunning, J. D. and Miller, M. E.: Effects of pore fluid chemistry on stable
sliding of Berea sandstone, Pure Appl. Geophys., 122,
447–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874611</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fortin, J., Stanchits, S., Vinciguerra, S., and Guéguen, Y.: Influence of
thermal and mechanical cracks on permeability and elastic wave velocities in
a basalt from Mt. Etna volcano subjected to elevated pressure,
Tectonophysics, 503, 60–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.028</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ghaffari, H. O. and Pec, M.: An ultrasound probe array for a high-pressure,
high-temperature solid medium deformation apparatus, Rev. Sci. Instrum.,
91, 085117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004035</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ghaffari, H. O., Mok, U., and Pec, M.: On calibration of piezoelectric
sensors with laser doppler vibrometer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 150, 2503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0006445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0006445</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gislason, S. R. and Hans, P. E.: Meteoric water-basalt interactions. I: A
laboratory study, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 2827–2840,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90161-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90161-X</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Gislason, S. R. and Oelkers, E. H.: Carbon Storage in Basalt, Science, 344, 373–374, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250828</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gislason, S. R., Wolff-Boenisch, D., Stefansson, A., Oelkers, E. H.,
Gunnlaugsson, E., Sigurdardottir, H., Sigfusson, B., Broecker, W. S.,
Matter, J. M., and Stute, M.: Mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide in
basalt: A pre-injection overview of the CarbFix project, Int. J. Greenh. Gas
Con., 4, 537–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Goff, F. and Lackner, K. S.: Carbon dioxide sequestering using ultramafic
rocks, Environ. Geosci., 5, 89–101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0984.1998.0a8014.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0984.1998.0a8014.x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Guglielmi, Y., Cappa, F., Avouac, J. P., Henry, P., and Elsworth, D.:
Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip, Science, 348, 1224–1226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0476" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0476</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hangx, S. J. T. and Spiers, C. J.: Reaction of plagioclase feldspars with
CO<sub>2</sub> under hydrothermal conditions, Chem. Geol., 265,  88–98,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.12.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.12.005</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, L. D., Dipple, G. M., Gordon, T. M., and Kellett, D. A.: CARBONATED
SERPENTINITE (LISTWANITE) AT ATLIN, BRITISH COLUMBIA: A GEOLOGICAL ANALOGUE
TO CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION, Can. Mineral., 43, 225–239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gscanmin.43.1.225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gscanmin.43.1.225</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hatton, C. G., Main, I. G., and Meredith, P. G.: A comparison of seismic and
structural measurements of scaling exponents during tensile subcritical
crack growth, J. Struct. Geol., 15, 1485–1495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(93)90008-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(93)90008-X</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Heap, M. J., Baud, P., Meredith, P. G., Bell, A. F., and Main, I. G.:
Time-dependent brittle creep in darley dale sandstone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006212" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006212</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Heap, M. J., Baud, P., Meredith, P. G., Vinciguerra, S., Bell, A. F., and
Main, I. G.: Brittle creep in basalt and its application to time-dependent
volcano deformation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 71–82,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.035</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Heard, H. C.: Chapter 7: Transition from Brittle Fracture to Ductile Flow in
Solenhofen Limestone as a Function of Temperature, Confining Pressure, and
Interstitial Fluid Pressure, in: Rock Deformation (A Symposium), Vol. 79, Geological Society of America, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM79-p193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/MEM79-p193</a>,
ISBN
978-0-8137-1079-2, 1960.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Heilbronner, R. and Barrett, S.: Image Analysis in Earth Sciences, Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-10343-8, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Helmons, R. L. J., Miedema, S. A., and van Rhee, C.: Simulating hydro
mechanical effects in rock deformation by combination of the discrete
element method and the smoothed particle method, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 86, 224–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.018</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Hillig, W. B.: The C-H delayed failure mechanism revisited, Int. J. Fract.,
139, 197–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-0025-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-0025-3</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Iyer, K., Jamtveit, B., Mathiesen, J., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., and Feder,
J.: Reaction-assisted hierarchical fracturing during serpentinization, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 267, 503–516, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.060</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Jamtveit, B., Putnis, C. V., and Malthe-Sørenssen, A.: Reaction induced
fracturing during replacement processes, Contrib. Mineral. Petr.,
157, 127–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-008-0324-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-008-0324-y</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kanakiya, S., Adam, L., Esteban, L., Rowe, M. C., and Shane, P.: Dissolution
and secondary mineral precipitation in basalts due to reactions with
carbonic acid, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 122, 4312–4327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014019</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kelemen, P. B. and Hirth, G.: Reaction-driven cracking during retrograde
metamorphism: Olivine hydration and carbonation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
345–348, 81–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.018</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kelemen, P. B. and Matter, J. M.: In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO<sub>2</sub>
storage, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 17295–17300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805794105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805794105</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kelemen, P. B., Savage, H. M., and Hirth, G.: Reaction-Driven Cracking During
Mineral Hydration, Carbonation and Oxidation, in: Poromechanics V, Vol. c,
823–826, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kranz, R. L., Harris, W. J., and Carter, N. L.: Static fatigue of granite at
200&thinsp;°C, Geophys. Res. Lett., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL009i001p00001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL009i001p00001</a>, 9, 1–4, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lackner, K. S., Wendt, C. H., Butt, D. P., Joyce, E. L., and Sharp, D. H.:
Carbon dioxide disposal in carbonate minerals, Energy, 20, 1153–1170,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lambart, S., Savage, H. M., Robinson, B. G., and Kelemen, P. B.: Experimental
Investigation of the Pressure of Crystallization of Ca(OH) 2: Implications
for the Reactive Cracking Process, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 19, 3448–3458,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007609" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007609</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Larsson, D., Grönvold, K., Oskarsson, N., and Gunnlaugsson, E.:
Hydrothermal alteration of plagioclase and growth of secondary feldspar in
the Hengill Volcanic Centre, SW Iceland, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
114, 275–290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(01)00267-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(01)00267-0</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lisabeth, H. P., Zhu, W., Xing, T., and De Andrade, V.: Dissolution-Assisted
Pattern Formation During Olivine Carbonation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44,
9622–9631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074393</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Liteanu, E., Niemeijer, A. R., Spiers, C. J., Peach, C. J., and De Bresser,
J. H. P.: The effect of CO<sub>2</sub> on creep of wet calcite aggregates, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008789</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lockner, D. A.: The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture,
Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 30, 883–899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Lockner, D. A., Byerlee, J. D., Kuksenko, V., Ponomarev, A., and Sidorin, A.:
Observations of Quasistatic Fault Growth from Acoustic Emissions, Int.
Geophys., 51, 3–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(08)62813-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(08)62813-2</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Macdonald, A. H. and Fyfe, W. S.: Rate of serpentinization in seafloor
environments, Tectonophysics, 116, 123–135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(85)90225-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(85)90225-2</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Mani, D., Nirmal Charan, S., and Kumar, B.: Assessment of carbon dioxide
sequestration potential of ultramafic rocks in the greenstone belts of
southern India, Curr. Sci., 94, 53–60, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Matter, J. M. and Kelemen, P. B.: Permanent storage of carbon dioxide in
geological reservoirs by mineral carbonation, Nat. Geosci., 2, 837–841,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo683</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Matter, J. M., Takahashi, T., and Goldberg, D. S.: Experimental evaluation of
in situ CO<sub>2</sub>-water-rock reactions during CO<sub>2</sub> injection in basaltic rocks:
Implications for geological CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001427</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Matter, J. M., Stute, M., Snaebjornsdottir, S. O., Oelkers, E. H., Gislason,
S. R., Aradottir, E. S., Sigfusson, B., Gunnarsson, I., Sigurdardottir, H.,
Gunnlaugsson, E., Axelsson, G., Alfredsson, H. A., Wolff-Boenisch, D.,
Mesfin, K., Taya, D. F. d.l. R., Hall, J., Dideriksen, K., and Broecker, W.
S.: Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic
carbon dioxide emissions, Science, 352, 1312–1314,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8132</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
McGrail, B. P., Schaef, H. T., Ho, A. M., Chien, Y. J., Dooley, J. J., and
Davidson, C. L.: Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in flood
basalts, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004169</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
McGrail, B. P., Spane, F. A. A., Sullivan, E. C., Bacon, D. H., and Hund, G.:
The Wallula basalt sequestration pilot project, Enrgy. Proced., 4,
5653–5660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.557</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
McGrail, B. P., Schaef, H. T., Spane, F. A., Horner, J. A., Owen, A. T.,
Cliff, J. B., Qafoku, O., Thompson, C. J., and Sullivan, E. C.: Wallula
Basalt Pilot Demonstration Project: Post-injection Results and Conclusions,
Enrgy. Proced., 114, 5783–5790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1716" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1716</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Meredith, P. G. and Atkinson, B. K.: Stress corrosion and acoustic emission
during tensile crack propagation in Whin Sill dolerite and other basic
rocks, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 75, 1–21,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1983.tb01911.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1983.tb01911.x</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Michalske, T. A. and Freiman, S. W.: A Molecular Mechanism for Stress
Corrosion in Vitreous Silica, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 66, 284–288,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb15715.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb15715.x</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Mighani, S., Bernabé, Y., Boulenouar, A., Mok, U., and Evans, B.: Creep
Deformation in Vaca Muerta Shale From Nanoindentation to Triaxial
Experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 7842–7868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017524</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Nara, Y., Yamanaka, H., Oe, Y., and Kaneko, K.: Influence of temperature and
water on subcritical crack growth parameters and long-term strength for
igneous rocks, Geophys. J. Int., 193, 47–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs116</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Negative Emissions
Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda, National
Academies Press, Washington, D.C., <a href="https://doi.org/10.17226/25259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17226/25259</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Oelkers, E. H., Gislason, S. R., and Matter, J. M.: Mineral carbonation of
CO<sub>2</sub>, Elements, 4, 333–337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.5.333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.5.333</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Orowan, E.: The fatigue of glass under stress, Nature, 154, 341–343,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/154341a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/154341a0</a>, 1944.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Panozzo, R. É.: Two-dimensional strain from the orientation of lines in
a plane, J. Struct. Geol., 6, 215–221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(84)90098-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(84)90098-1</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Reber, J. E. and Pec, M.: Comparison of brittle- and viscous creep in
quartzites: Implications for semi-brittle flow of rocks, J. Struct. Geol., 113, 90–99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.05.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.05.022</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Reches, Z. and Lockner, D. A.: Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle
rocks, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 99, 18159–18173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00115</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, F., Gundersen, E., Hellmann, R., Collombet, M., and Le Guen, Y.:
Numerical modeling of the effect of carbon dioxide sequestration on the rate
of pressure solution creep in limestone: Preliminary results, Oil Gas Sci.
Technol., 60, 381–399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2005023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2005023</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, F., Kandula, N., McBeck, J., and Cordonnier, B.: Creep Burst
Coincident With Faulting in Marble Observed in 4-D Synchrotron X-Ray Imaging
Triaxial Compression Experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2020JB020354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020354</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Rice, J. R.: Thermodynamics of the quasi-static growth of Griffith cracks,
J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 26, 61–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(78)90014-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(78)90014-5</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Robertson, E. C.: Creep of Solenhofen Limestone Under Moderate Hydrostatic
Pressure, 227–244, 1960.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Robertson, E. C.: Viscoelasticity of rocks, State Stress Earth's Crust,
181–233, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Rudge, J. F., Kelemen, P. B., and Spiegelman, M.: A simple model of
reaction-induced cracking applied to serpentinization and carbonation of
peridotite, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 291, 215–227,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.01.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.01.016</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, E. H.: The influence of interstitial water on the rheological
behaviour of calcite rocks, Tectonophysics, 14, 13–33,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(72)90003-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(72)90003-0</a>, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Rutter, E. H. and Hackston, A.: On the effective stress law for rock-on-rock
frictional sliding, and fault slip triggered by means of fluid injection,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 375, 20160001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0001</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Scholz, C. H.: Mechanism of creep in brittle rock, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 3295–3302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i010p03295" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i010p03295</a>, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Scholz, C. H.: Static fatigue of quartz, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 2104–2114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB077i011p02104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB077i011p02104</a>, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Seifritz, W.: CO<sub>2</sub> disposal by means of silicates, Nature, 345,
486–486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/345486b0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/345486b0</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Skarbek, R. M., Savage, H. M., Kelemen, P. B., and Yancopoulos, D.:
Competition Between Crystallization-Induced Expansion and Creep Compaction
During Gypsum Formation, and Implications for Serpentinization, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 5372–5393, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015369</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó. and Gislason, S. R.: CO<sub>2</sub> Storage
Potential of Basaltic Rocks Offshore Iceland, Enrgy. Proced., 86, 371–380,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.038</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Gislason, S. R., Galeczka, I. M., and
Oelkers, E. H.: Reaction path modelling of in-situ mineralisation of CO<sub>2</sub> at
the CarbFix site at Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 220,
348–366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.053</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Sigfússon, B., Marieni, C.,
Goldberg, D., Gislason, S. R., and Oelkers, E. H.: Carbon dioxide storage
through mineral carbonation, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 90–102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Terzaghi, K.: Theoretical soil mechanics, Chapman And Hall, Limited,
London, ISBN 0471853054 9780471853053, 1943.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Tutolo, B. M., Awolayo, A., and Brown, C.: Alkalinity Generation Constraints
on Basalt Carbonation for Carbon Dioxide Removal at the Gigaton-per-Year
Scale, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 11906–11915,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02733" target="_blank"/>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Wong, L. N. Y. and Einstein, H. H.: Systematic evaluation of cracking
behavior in specimens containing single flaws under uniaxial compression,
Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 46, 239–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.006</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, T., Zhu, W., Fusseis, F., and Lisabeth, H.: Generating porosity during olivine carbonation via dissolution channels and expansion cracks, Solid Earth, 9, 879–896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-879-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-879-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Xing, T., Ghaffari, O. H., Mok, U., and Pec, M.:  Creep of Basalts Undergoing Carbonation: Effect of Rock-Fluid Interaction, Zenodo [data set],  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4926587" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4926587</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zakharova, N. V., Goldberg, D. S., Sullivan, E. C., Herron, M. M., and Grau,
J. A.: Petrophysical and geochemical properties of Columbia River flood
basalt: Implications for carbon sequestration, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 13, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004305</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X. and Spiers, C. J.: Compaction of granular calcite by pressure
solution at room temperature and effects of pore fluid chemistry, Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min., 42, 950–960, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.017</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Spiers, C. J., and Peach, C. J.: Compaction creep of wet granular
calcite by pressure solution at 28&thinsp;°C to 150&thinsp;°C, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005853</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Z. L., Xu, W. Y., Wang, W., and Wang, R. B.: Triaxial creep tests of
rock from the compressive zone of dam foundation in Xiangjiaba Hydropower
Station, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 50, 133–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.003</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, W. and Wong, T.: The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic
flow: Permeability evolution, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 3027–3041,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03282" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03282</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, W., Fusseis, F., Lisabeth, H. P., Xing, T., Xiao, X., De Andrade, V.,
and Karato, S.: Experimental evidence of reaction-induced fracturing during
olivine carbonation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9535–9543,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070834" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070834</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
