<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-14-1155-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in the evolution of orogenic systems: application <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> to the Himalayan–Tibetan collision zone</article-title><alt-title>The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure in the evolution of orogenic systems</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure in the evolution of orogenic systems}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Liu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Mengxue</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Dinghui</given-names></name>
          <email>ydh@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Rui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Dinghui Yang (ydh@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>November</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>1155</fpage><lpage>1168</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>July</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e99">Continental collision is a crucial process in plate tectonics. However, in terms of the evolution and the controlling parameters of its lateral heterogeneity, our understanding of the tectonic complexities at such a convergent plate boundary remains largely unclear. In this study, we conducted a series of two-dimensional numerical experiments to investigate how continental lithospheric thermal structure influences the development of lateral heterogeneity along the continental collision zone. The following two end-members were achieved. First, continuous subduction mode, which prevails when the model has a cold procontinental Moho temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). In this case, a narrow collision orogen develops, and the subducting angle steepens with the increasing retrocontinental Moho temperature. Second, continental subduction with a slab break-off, which generates a relative wide collision orogen and dominates when the model has a relatively hot procontinental Moho temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), especially when the Moho temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Radioactive heat production is the second-order controlling parameter in varying the continental collision mode, while it prefers to enhance strain localization in the upper part of the continental lithosphere and promote the growth of shear zones there. By comparing the model results with geological observations, we suggest that the discrepant evolutionary paths from the continuous subduction underlying the Hindu Kush to the continental subduction after slab break-off beneath eastern Tibet may originate from the inherited lateral inhomogeneity of the Indian lithospheric thermal structure. Besides, the high content of crustal radioactive elements may be one of the most important factors that controls the formation of large thrust fault zones in the Himalayas.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42104097</award-id>
<award-id>U1839206</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e168">The collision between the Indian and Asian continents, following the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean, is regarded as one of the key geodynamical processes of plate tectonics (Toussaint et al., 2004), which creates the world's largest orogen (the Alpine–Himalaya orogen) and highest plateau (the Tibetan Plateau). It would be really hard to maintain a homogeneous plate morphology and the crustal–mantle deformation features during such a large-scale collision stretching thousands of kilometers. Many of the previous observations have already provided insights into the significant lateral heterogeneity of Himalayan–Tibetan orogen (Zhou and Murphy, 2005; Li et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2015). Specifically, the horizontal underthrusting distance of the Indian lithosphere decreases, and the subducting angle increases laterally from west to east. Despite various mechanisms that have been invoked, including the geometry of the subducting plate (Nettesheim et al., 2018; Koptev et al., 2019), inhomogeneous inherit lithospheric structure, variations in rock composition, characters of terrane assembly, and the complex tectonic settings (Beaumont et al., 1994; Chen et al., 2016, 2019; Vogt et al., 2018; Liu and Yang, 2022), the development of the collision zone's lateral heterogeneity remains ambiguous and requires further investigation.</p>
      <p id="d1e171">Many of the laboratory (Willingshofer and Sokoutis, 2009; Luth et al., 2010) and numerical modeling experiments (Beaumont et al., 1994; Pysklywec, 2001; Toussaint et al., 2004; Huangfu et al., 2017; Liao and Gerya, 2017; Vogt et al., 2018; S. Liu et al., 2022) have suggested that the lithospheric thermal structure is one of the important controlling parameters contributing to the regulation the evolution of<?pagebreak page1156?> continental collision (Pysklywec, 2001; Faccenda et al., 2008; Ueda et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2020; M. Liu et al., 2022). Pysklywec (2001) once used a series of thermomechanical models that focused on the evolutionary modes of the continental lithospheric mantle during collision. The experiments suggested that an increase in the lithospheric geotherm resulted in a transition of the lithospheric mantle from an asymmetric, subduction-like mode to ablative subduction. Similarly, on the basis of two-dimensional mechanical models, Toussaint et al. (2004) investigated the potential scenarios for the evolution of continental collision. They concluded that models with a relatively low  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) Moho temperature and a fast convergence rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are more likely to maintain stable subduction. On the contrary, among warmer and slower convergent models, lithospheric folding, pure-shear thickening, and Rayleigh–Taylor (RT) instabilities prevailed. Ghazian and Buiter (2013) used 2D numerical models to discuss the sensitivity of various collision modes to velocity, crust–mantle temperature structure, lithospheric rheology, and the density difference between the lithospheric mantle and asthenosphere. They recognized that velocity, lithospheric rheology, and temperature have important controls. More precisely, stable continental subduction evolves over a large range of values for convergent velocity and lithospheric temperature. Fast and cold models tend to fold, while slow and warm ones can generate RT-type dripping. Heron and Pysklywec (2016) subsequently presented dynamic thermomechanical experiments to explore the role of lithospheric inherited weakness in the orogenic process. According to their model results, lithospheric temperature exerts a strong control on lithospheric strength; it may influence the brittle–ductile transition depth to help determine which layer (upper crust, lower crust, or lithospheric mantle) dominantly controls the lithospheric deformation style in a collision system. Recently, Huangfu et al. (2019) employed systematic numerical simulations to study the dynamics of the lithospheric-scale subduction and crustal-scale underthrusting of the continental collision zone. They found that models with low convergence velocity and a cold upper plate are inclined to lithospheric-scale subduction, whereas models with high velocity and a hot overriding plate contribute to crustal-scale underthrusting. Though numerous numerical simulations are employed to qualify the effects of lithospheric thermal structure, it is noteworthy, however, that earlier studies consistently and  mainly focused on the influences of the overriding lithospheric thermal structure. A fairly large number of them neglected oceanic subduction prior to the continental collision for simplicity. Thus, our understanding of tectonic complexities that may emerge during progressive crust–mantle deformation at the convergent plate boundary remains largely unclear.</p>
      <p id="d1e215">Here we present a series of high-resolution numerical experiments to gain new insights to how continental lithospheric thermal structure influences the evolutionary path of the continental collision system. Temperature heterogeneities are incorporated by altering the continental Moho temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and crustal radioactive heat production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. In the end, the results of our models are used to draw comparisons with some first-order characters of the Indian–Asian collision zone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Governing equation</title>
      <p id="d1e255">We use the parallel code Advanced Solver for Problems in Earth's ConvecTion (ASPECT; Kronbichler et al., 2012), an extensible code of the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> program library deal.ii (Differential Equations Analysis Library; <uri>https://www.dealii.org/</uri>, last access: 24 June 2023), which is targeted at the computational solution of partial differential equations, using adaptive finite elements (Arndt et al., 2021), to solve three conservation equations. The methodology is similar to our recent work (Liu and Yang, 2022; M. Liu et al., 2022). The models are calculated by solving the following equations of conservation of mass, momentum, and internal energy for an incompressible medium and adopting the extended Boussinesq approximation (van Zelst et al., 2022).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M14" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            On the right-hand side of Eq. (3), the three terms represent the internal heat production that includes radioactive decay, frictional heating, and adiabatic compression of material. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the viscosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the deviator of the strain rate tensor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the pressure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravitational acceleration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the interesting domain, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the heat capacity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the heat conductivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intrinsic specific heat production, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the thermal expansion coefficient, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the adiabatic reference density. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is named compositional fields here (e.g., upper crust and lower crust; Kronbichler et al., 2012). As the medium was considered incompressible, we assumed that the density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Eq. (1) satisfied the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M28" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference density at reference temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (293 K).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e721"><bold>(a)</bold> Reference model configuration and boundary conditions. Different colors reflect different lithologies, where 1 and 8 are the continental upper crust, 2 and 9 are the continental lower crust, 3 and 10 are the continental lithospheric mantle, 4 is the weak zone, 5 is the sediment, 6 is the oceanic crust, 7 is the oceanic lithospheric mantle, and 11 is the sub-lithospheric mantle (Table S1). The white lines are isotherms of 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C increments in the range of 200 to 1200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">surf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface temperature, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lab</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom temperature of continental lithosphere. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">out</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote where material flows in and out. <bold>(b)</bold> Initial distributions of procontinental (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cp</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pro</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), retrocontinental (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cp</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">retro</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and oceanic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">op</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) lithospheric temperatures.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Rheology</title>
      <p id="d1e849">Our models are based on the common assumption that solid Earth materials are treated as highly viscous fluids. Thus, we<?pagebreak page1157?> apply a viscoplastic rheology (Glerum et al., 2018). The viscous regime uses a composite of diffusion and dislocation creep that can be conveniently formulated, as follows (Karato and Wu, 1993; Karato, 2008):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.4}{9.4}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">disl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">disl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">disl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PV</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diss</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">disl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RT</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">disl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the square root of second invariant of the deviatoric strain rate. In the case of diffusion creep, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while for dislocation creep <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Definitions and values of other symbols are shown in Table S1 in the Supplement. Surface erosion and sedimentation are neglected.</p>
      <p id="d1e1077">The plastic yielding is defined by the Drucker–Prager criterion as Eq. (8) (Davis and Selvadurai, 2002):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yield</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cohesion, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the initial friction angle. We also include strain weakening in the plastic regime, through which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are linearly weakened by a factor of 2 or 4 between plastic strains of 0.5 and 1.5.</p>
      <p id="d1e1160">The effective viscosity is eventually given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is one of the subscripts among diff, disl, comp, and yield. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are user-defined viscosity cutoffs (Table S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Initial model configuration and boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e1242">The numerical model domain is 2000 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 660 km in the horizontal and vertical directions. It contains a retrocontinental lithosphere and a procontinental lithosphere, with an oceanic lithosphere in between (Fig. 1). A weak zone with a width of 10 km (gabbro; Wilks and Carter, 1990) abuts the oceanic plate to facilitate subduction. The continental lithosphere is 120 km thick, consisting of a 25 km thick upper crust (wet quartzite; Gleason and Tullis, 1995), a 10 km lower crust (wet anorthite; Rybacki et al., 2006), and an 85 km lithospheric mantle. The oceanic lithosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ma) contains a 4 km thick sediment layer (gabbro; Wilks and Carter, 1990), an 8 km thick oceanic crust layer (gabbro; Wilks and Carter, 1990), and an 88 km thick lithospheric mantle. Dry olivine (Hirth and Kohlstedt, 2003) is used for the mantle. All material properties are listed in Table S1. The numerical resolution incrementally increases along the depth direction from 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km to 8 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 km.</p>
      <p id="d1e1276">Temperature is fixed at the model surface (0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and the base of the lithosphere (1300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), while various continental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined ranging from 450–600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The initial continental lithospheric temperature profile follows Chapman (1986), taking into account the thickness of each lithologic layer (Eqs. 11–13). According to these equations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not independent parameters; we thus fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when investigating the influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Specially, we first choose a surface (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Moho temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and radioactive heat production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then calculate the surface heat flow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), based on Eq. (12). After that, we substitute the above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into Eq. (11) to obtain the continental crustal temperature structure. The oceanic lithospheric<?pagebreak page1158?> temperature distribution follows the half-space cooling model (Turcotte and Schubert, 2002), and in all models, we use the same initial oceanic lithospheric thermal structure. Besides, a temperature gradient of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed for the sublithospheric mantle (Huangfu et al., 2019).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the heat flux, and the subscripts “T” and “B” denote the top and bottom boundaries of each lithologic layer, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the layer thickness, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volumetric heat production, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the thermal conductivity.</p>
      <p id="d1e1655">We apply a free-surface and free-slip lower boundary and impose a 5 cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> convergence rate to the trailing end of the procontinental lithosphere. Equivalent material flows out through both side walls of the mantle domain to keep mass balance within the whole computational domain (Fig. 1).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1679">We conducted 48 numerical experiments by varying the Moho temperature, upper crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and lower crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the retrocontinent and procontinent, respectively, to capture different continental thermal structures. Two distinct continental collision evolutionary paths were recognized, namely (i) continuous subduction and (ii) continental subduction with a slab break-off. All the simulations are summarized in Table S2.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Continuous subduction without slab break-off (Mode I)</title>
      <p id="d1e1721">Figure 2 shows the development of the continuous subduction mode, and it takes the Model m2 (reference model; Table S2) as an example. The model started with a relatively shallow angle subduction characterized by the oceanic plate dips downward along the low-viscosity weak zone (Fig. 2a1; 3 Myr). During this stage, a portion of oceanic sediment was scraped off and stacked at the surface, accompanied by the slight uplift of the retrocontinental foreland (Fig. 2a2 and c). As the subduction goes on, the dipping angle of the slab in depth gradually steepens due to the increasing slab pull (Fig. 2a2; 9 Myr). At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Myr (Fig. 2a3), continents collide with each other after the full consumption of the oceanic plate. Under the continued oceanic slab pulling, the procontinental lithosphere inherited the subduction, which is characterized by further subducting the  angle steepening that resulted in the superposition of retrocontinental upper crust and oceanic sediment on the procontinental forepart. With the proceeding of procontinental subduction, the collision wedge uplifted prominently (Fig. 2c). After that, a large part of the oceanic sediment previously scraped off was then entrained and subducted with the procontinental crust, followed by the rapid uplift at the retro side of the collision zone and the retro-ward advance of the suture (Fig. 2c). From <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Myr on, the buoyant procontinental upper crust began to detach from the underlying lithosphere, mixed with the exhumed oceanic sediment, and accumulated together in the subduction channel (Figs. 2a4 and a5). During this time, uplift within the collision zone gradually expands to the retrocontinental interior (Fig. 2c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1746">Time evolution of Model m2. Snapshots of compositional fields <bold>(a1–a5)</bold>, viscosity <bold>(b1–b5)</bold>, and topography <bold>(c)</bold> for selected model times are shown. The lithologies and isotherms are the same as in Fig. 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Continental subduction with a slab break-off (Mode II)</title>
      <p id="d1e1772">In Model m7, both the pro- and retrocontinent have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than Model m2 (Table S2). The lithospheric deformation behaviors and the evolution of the model during the oceanic subduction phase are quite similar to those observed in Model m2 (Fig. 3a1). The only difference is that the slab steepened more rapidly at a later stage, which gave rise to the decoupling between the retrocontinental lithosphere and the oceanic plate. Such a process created an ideal space for the asthenospheric upwelling and resulted in the significant weakening of the retrocontinental lithosphere (Fig. 3a2; 8.5 Myr). After <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Myr, the combined effect of the increasing slab pull and asthenosphere upwelling promoted necking around the oceanic–procontinental lithospheric transition zone (Fig. 3a3; 11 Myr). The procontinental lithosphere then arrived at the trench and initiated subducting along the inclined weak zone, thus accommodating most of the ongoing convergence. During this stage, the continuous compression and rebound after slab break-off significantly uplifted the collision zone. Later on, the upper part of the retrocontinental lithosphere indented into the procrust, scraping off most of the procontinental upper crust and causing significant thickening and localized shear zones there, while leaving the small residual portion to subduct with the lithosphere. Subsequently, the accumulated orogenic wedge gradually grew into a relatively wide surface uplift.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1798">Results of Model m7. Snapshots of compositional fields <bold>(a1–a5)</bold>, viscosity <bold>(b1–b5)</bold>, and topography <bold>(c)</bold> for selected model times are shown. The lithologies and isotherms are the same as in Fig. 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Sensitivity tests of continental lithospheric thermal structure on the evolution of continental convergence</title>
      <?pagebreak page1161?><p id="d1e1824">A regime diagram (Fig. 4) of all the models summarizes the template simulations investigating the effects of continental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and two contrasting end members of continental collision modes are identified. Models with a cold procontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) generally exhibit a continuous subduction mode without slab break-off. Meanwhile, the hotter the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the steeper the subducting angle is (Figs. 4a and 5a). In comparison, Mode II dominates among the models with a relative hot procontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), especially when the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is greater than 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 4a). In addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a second-order controlling parameter compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as it has a greater propensity to alter the upper part of lithospheric deformation styles than the continental collision mode (Fig. 6c–i).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1966">Schematic figures of models with different <bold>(a)</bold> continental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> upper, and <bold>(c)</bold> lower crustal radioactive heat production (Table S2). The diagram in each panel shows the dependence of collision mode on the corresponding controlling parameters of both colliding plates.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>How does continental Moho temperature influence the trajectory of the collision system?</title>
      <p id="d1e2012">As mentioned above, models incorporating a cold prolithosphere generally evolve into continuous subduction without slab break-off. It may come from the fact that a cold prolithosphere is strong enough to maintain its strength and that it also keeps coupling with the retrolithosphere during plate convergence. Thus, the prolithosphere suffers moderate roll-back, under the condition that the stress is not sufficient to yield the lithosphere and generate break-off (Fig. 2 and S1 in the Supplement). Based on further analysis of this mode of models, we notice that the subducting angle increases as the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, accompanied by much more procrust accumulation at shallow and intense retrolithospheric mantle destruction (Fig. 5a–d). The mechanism behind this is that increasing the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can weaken the retrolithosphere and increase the thermal structural difference between the two continents, which may lead to plate decoupling. As a consequence, it is more likely for the prolithosphere to roll back as the magnitude of decoupling increases. Besides, weakening of the retrolithosphere may also offer a favorable condition for the intrusion of accumulated procrustal material into it.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2039"><bold>(a)</bold> Geometries of subducting plate in models with different retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outlined by 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotherms. Compositional fields of models with decreasing retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> m4, retro <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <bold>(c)</bold> m12, retro <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <bold>(d)</bold> m8, and retro <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. White lines denote the isotherms (200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C increments). Panel <bold>(e)</bold> shows the relationship between the times of slab break-off and continental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panels <bold>(f)</bold>–<bold>(h)</bold> are strain rate of models with various procontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2207">Temperature profiles <bold>(a)</bold>, topography <bold>(b)</bold>, and strain rate (<bold>c–i</bold>; at 20 Myr) of models with different crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2237">Regarding Mode II, models with hot procontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) always evolve into continental subduction, following a slab break-off. In these models, when the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined (1) as the procontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases, the procontinental lithosphere becomes cold, which results in a rheologically strong lithosphere that can be subjected to greater deformation; the slab thus breaks off much later (Fig. 5e). This is consistent with many of the previous numerical studies (van de Zedde and Wortel, 2001; van Hunen and Allen, 2011; Duretz et al., 2011). However, it appears that Duretz and Gerya (2013) proposed an apparent opposite tendency. It may come from the fact that these models do not use a layered crust. As a consequence, a strong crust is more likely to result in strong crust–mantle coupling and a deeper slab break-off under slower convergence, while a weak crust leads to crust–mantle decoupling that may evolve into delamination. (2) The depth of the slab break-off in our models is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 km, which is in the range indicated by Davies and von Blanckenburg (1995), Li et al. (2002), and Duretz et al. (2011, 2012). (3) After slab break-off, the buoyant continental lithosphere experiences a rebound accompanied by strong surface uplift within a short duration (Fig. 3c), which coincides with Duretz and Gerya (2013) and Magni et al. (2017). Slab break-off is often considered to be an early process of continental collision, and numerous numerical simulations have been conducted to investigate it. Comparing their results with our models, we suggest that slab break-off is closely related to the rheological strength of the lithosphere. Therefore, the parameters that have prominent impacts on it, such as oceanic plate age, convergence velocity, continental crustal structure, layered crustal rheological strength, and the strength of the interface between the subducting and overriding plates, etc. (Gerya et al., 2004; Burov, 2011; Duretz et al., 2011; Magni et al., 2017; Koptev et al., 2022), may significantly influence the evolutionary path of slab break-off.</p>
      <p id="d1e2303">In conclusion, we propose that continental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an important parameter in shaping the continental collision system and especially influences the fate of subduction. The hotter the procontinent, the weaker and easier it is to evolve into a slab break-off. The hotter either the procontinent or the retrocontinent, the less coupled it is with the adjacent plate. In addition, as a result of ongoing subduction, the slab rolls back rapidly, which may generate a gap between the adjacent plates. The asthenosphere then upwells into it, which in turn aggravates the roll-back. This contributes to the development of intense strain localization in the prolithosphere and finally leads to slab break-off (Figs. 3, S2 and 5f–h).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>How crustal radioactive heat production influences the trajectory of the collision system</title>
      <p id="d1e2325">Radioactive elements are thought to mainly exist in the continental crust, and the radioactive heat production that originates from their decay is one of the important internal heat sources in the Earth, which influences the continental lithospheric thermal structure significantly (Turcotte and Schubert, 2002; Faccenda et al., 2008). According to our model results, increasing the upper crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can distinctly increase the thermal gradient of the lithospheric upper part, under the effect of which the steep surface topography built at the early stage of continental collision would tend to be relatively gentle. In comparison, varying lower crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has much less influence on the variation in the continental lithospheric thermal gradient and the evolution of surface topography. Moreover, as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the crust increases, the lithospheric rheological strength decreases, which facilitates the growth of crustal shear zones. That is, the higher the crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the more shear zones it may generate in the crust (Fig. 6c–i). In conclusion, crustal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a crucial parameter in enhancing strain localization in the lithospheric upper part that is closely related to the growth of shear zones, while it exerts a second-order influence on altering the continental collision mode.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1162?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Implications for the development of lateral heterogeneity of Indian–Asian collision</title>
      <p id="d1e2392">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km long east–west Himalayan–Tibetan orogenic system was created by continental collision from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 50 Ma, with the Nanga Parbat syntaxis as its west margin and the Namcha Barwa syntaxis in the east (Chen et al., 2015). It has been proven by contrasting along-strike lithospheric structures (Li et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2015; Kufner et al., 2021). By comparison, our models are capable of providing several first-order fits of the crust–mantle deformation behaviors to this natural collision system, especially at the Hindu Kush profile and the eastern Tibet profile.</p>
      <p id="d1e2415">Hindu Kush is the westernmost end of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen. Previous seismic tomography studies have confirmed that there is a north-dipping, downward-steepening, and thinning high-velocity anomaly (HVA), accompanied by increasingly intense seismicity, underneath the region (Kufner et al., 2016, 2021). The inclined HVA is believed to be a subducting plate of Indian provenance and is part of the Indian–Asian collision system. The thinning of the HVA is in the extent between 180–220 km and was suggested to be at the transition zone between Indian continental lithosphere and Neo-Tethys oceanic lithosphere. In agreement with the observations, Model m2 has a similar tectonic background and shows an analogous continuous subduction characterized by a nearly vertical dipping angle and a slab necking at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. In addition, the relative narrow collision orogen in the model is also consistent with the natural topography in this region (Figs. 7a and 2c). It is worth noticing that the observed inclined distribution of earthquakes seems to coincide with the subducting<?pagebreak page1163?> continental crust. This may offer a possible explanation for the active intermediate earthquakes beneath this region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2430"><bold>(a)</bold> Geographic setting of Himalayan–Tibetan orogen. Schematic geologic cross sections across the <bold>(b)</bold> western (Hindu Kush; Kufner et al., 2021) and eastern Himalayan–Tibetan orogen (Li et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2019). Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the compositional field of Model m2 (mode I). Panels <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(g)</bold> are the strain rate and compositional field of Model m7 (Mode II), respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/14/1155/2023/se-14-1155-2023-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2454">The main part of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen is the product of a collision between the cold Indian craton and the relative warm Asian continent after the closure of Neo-Tethys, the geological settings of which are quite analogous with our Model m7. During the continental collision phase, the Indus–Yarlung suture zone bordering the Indian and Asian lithospheres moved significantly, creating an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km mountain (the Himalayas) and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km plateau (the Tibetan Plateau; Yin and Harrison, 2000). Unlike continuous subduction underlying the Hindu Kush, geological and seismological evidence shows that the eastern part of the profile is underlain by a shallower-angle subducting Indian lithosphere, following a slab break-off; these are also similar to the model results of Model m7 (Figs. 7b and 2c). Furthermore, previous field observations have shown that the northern part of the Indian continental crust is abundant with radioactive elements (Vidal et al., 1982; Scaillet et al., 1990; Macfarlane, 1992; Faccenda et al., 2008). Our sensitivity tests have recognized that continental crust with high radioactive heat production is more prone to result in brittle fractures and intense deformation of the lithospheric upper part, which may lead to the development of new shear zones (Fig. 6). This resembles the tectonic characteristics of large thrust fault zones in the Himalayas (Fig. 7b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2477">As a consequence, we speculate that the continental lithospheric thermal structural difference may be one of the key parameters that control the evolution of lateral heterogeneity along the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen and that the high content of crustal radioactive elements is one of the significant factors that dominates the growth of large thrust fault zones in the Himalayas.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1164?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2489">In this work, we systematically discuss the influences of the continental lithospheric thermal structure on the evolution of the continental collision system based on high-resolution thermomechanical numerical experiments. The model results demonstrate that two end-members of continental collision are obtained because the continuous subduction mainly occurs with a relative cold overriding lithosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and as the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, the subducting angle steepens. Slab break-off dominates when the model has a relatively hot procontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), especially when the retrocontinental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is greater than 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a second-order controlling parameter compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moho</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in shaping the continental collision mode, while it is more prone to facilitating the growth of crustal shear zones.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1166?><p id="d1e2599">The continental lithospheric thermal structure may have played a significant role in the development of lateral heterogeneity along the Himalayan–Tibetan orogenic belt. We suggest that the different evolutionary paths between the continuous subduction underlying the Hindu Kush and the continental subduction beneath eastern Tibet may come from the inherited lateral variation in the Indian lithospheric geothermal gradient. In addition, the high content of radioactive elements in the continental crust may be one of the important reasons for the development of deep and large thrust fault zones in this collision orogen.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2606">The input files of ASPECT are available at the Open Science Framework repository at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8076545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.8076545</ext-link> (Liu, 2023).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2612">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-1155-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-1155-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2621">MXL and DHY designed and oversaw the project. MXL performed all the numerical simulations. RQ participated in the discussions and revisions of the paper. All authors contributed to writing the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2627">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2633">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2639">This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42104097 and U1839206). The figures in this paper have been produced by Paraview V5.11.1, Generic Mapping Tools V5.4.2 (Wessel et al., 2013), Python V3.6.7, and Adobe Illustrator. We thank the Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics for supporting the development of ASPECT (<uri>https://aspect.geodynamics.org</uri>, last access: 24 June 2023). The version of ASPECT (version 2.4.0-pre) that we used in this paper is built on the open-source finite element package deal II (version 10.0.0-pre) through the candi installation package (<uri>https://github.com/dealii/candi</uri>, last access: 24 June 2023). Additional dependencies include Trilinos (13.0.0) and p4est (2.2.0). All the numerical models were run on the TianHe-1A cluster at National Supercomputer Center in Tianjin. We thank Lin Chen and Alexander Koptev for their constructive and thoughtful comments that substantially improved the paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2650">This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42104097 and U1839206).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2657">This paper was edited by Taras Gerya and reviewed by Lin Chen and Alexander Koptev.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arndt, D., Bangerth, W., Blais, B., Fehling, M., Gassmöller, R., Heister, T., Heltai, L., Köcher, U., Kronbichler, M., Maier, M., Munch, P., Pelteret, J.-P., Proell, S., Simon, K., Turcksin, B., Wells, D., and Zhang, J.: The deal. II library, Version 9.3, J. Numer. Math., 29, 171–186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma-2021-0081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1515/jnma-2021-0081</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beaumont, C., Fullsack, P., and Hamilton, J.: Styles of crustal deformation in compressional orogens caused by subduction of the underlying lithosphere, Tectonophysics, 232, 119–132, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90079-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(94)90079-5</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Burov, E. B.: Rheology and strength of the lithosphere, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 28, 1402–1443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.008</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chapman, D. S.: Thermal gradients in the continental crust, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 24, 63–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/0.1144/GSL.SP.1986.024.01.07" ext-link-type="DOI">0.1144/GSL.SP.1986.024.01.07</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, L. and Gerya, T. V.: The role of lateral lithospheric strength heterogeneities in orogenic plateau growth: Insights from 3-D thermo-mechanical modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid, 121, 3118–3138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JB012872</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, L., Song, X., D., Gerya, T., V., Xu, T., and Chen, Y.: Crustal melting beneath orogenic plateaus: Insights from 3-D thermo-mechanical modeling, Tectonophysics, 761, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.03.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2019.03.014</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., L, W., Yuan, X. H., Badal, J., and Teng, J. W.: Tearing of the Indian lithospheric slab beneath southern Tibet revealed by SKS-wave splitting measurements, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 413, 13–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.041</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Davies, H. J. and von Blanckenburg, F.: Slab breakoff: A model of lithosphere detachment and its test in the magmatism and deformation of collisional orogens, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 129, 85–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(94)00237-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(94)00237-S</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Davis, R. O. and Selvadurai, A. P. S.: Plasticity and Geomechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 0521818303, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duretz, T. and Gerya, T. V.: Slab detachment during continental collision: Influence of crustal rheology and interaction with lithospheric delamination, Tectonophysics, 602, 124–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.024</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duretz, T., Gerya, T. V., and May, D. A.: Numerical modelling of spontaneous slab breakoff and subsequent topographic response, Tectonophysics, 502, 244–256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.024</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duretz, T., Schmalholz, S. M., and Gerya, T. V.: Dynamics of slab detachment, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 13, Q03020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC004024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GC004024</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Faccenda, M., Gerya, T. V., and Chakraborty, S.: Styles of post-subduction collisional orogeny: Influence of convergence velocity, crustal rheology and radiogenic heat production, Lithos, 103, 257–287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.09.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2007.09.009</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gerya, T. V., Yuen, D. A., and Maresch, W. V.: Thermomechanical modelling of slab detachment, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 226, 101–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.022</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ghazian, R. K. and Buiter, S. J. H.: A numerical investigation of continental collision styles, Geophys. J. Int., 193, 113—1152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggt068</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1167?><ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gleason, G. C. and Tullis, J.: A flow law for dislocation creep of quartz aggregates determined with the molten salt cell, Tectonophysics, 247, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(95)00011-B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(95)00011-B</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glerum, A., Thieulot, C., Fraters, M., Blom, C., and Spakman, W.: Nonlinear viscoplasticity in ASPECT: benchmarking and applications to subduction, Solid Earth, 9, 267–294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-267-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-9-267-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heron, P. J. and Pysklywec, R. N.: Inherited structure and coupled crust-mantle lithosphere evolution: Numerical models of Central Australia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4962–4970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL068562</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hirth, G. and Kohlstedt, D.: Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle wedge: A view from the experimentalists. Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 138, 83–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/138GM06" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/138GM06</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huangfu, P., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Li, Z., and Zhou, Y.: Dynamics of unstable continental subduction: Insights from numerical modeling, Sci. China Earth Sci., 60, 218–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5014-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-016-5014-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huangfu, P., Li, Z. H., Fan, W., and Shi, Y.: Dynamics of crustal overthrust versus underthrust in the continental collision zones: Numerical modelling, Terra Nova, 31, 332–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ter.12384</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Karato, S.-I.: Deformation of Earth Materials: An Introduction to the Rheology of Solid Earth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 9780511804892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511804892</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Karato, S.-I. and Wu, P.: Rheology of the upper mantle: A synthesis, Science, 260, 771–778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5109.771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.260.5109.771</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koptev, A., Ehlers, T. A., Nettesheim, M., and Whipp, D. M.: Response of a Rheologically stratified lithosphere to subduction of an indenter-shaped plate: Insights into localized exhumation at orogen syntaxes, Tectonics, 38, 1908–1930, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018TC005455</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koptev, A., Nettesheim, M., and Ehlers, T. A.: Plate corner subduction and rapid localized exhumation: Insights from 3D coupled geodynamic and geomorphological modelling, Terra Nova, 34, 210–223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12581" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ter.12581</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kronbichler, M., Heister, T., and Bangerth, W.: High accuracy mantle convection simulation through modern numerical methods, Geophys. J. Int., 191, 12–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05609.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05609.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kufner S. K., Schurr, B., Sippl, C., Yuan, X. H., Ratschbacher, L., Akbar, A. M., Ischuk, A., Murodkulov, S., Schneider, F., Mechie, J., and Tilmann, F.: Deep india meets deep asia: lithospheric indentation, delamination and break-off under pamir and hindu kush (central asia), Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 435, 171–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.046</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kufner, S. K., Kakar, N., Bezada, M., Bloch, W., and Schurr, B.: The Hindu Kush slab break-off as revealed by deep structure and crustal deformation, Nat. Commun., 12, 1685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21760-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-21760-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, C., van der Hilst, R. D., Meltzer, A. S., and Engdahl, E. R.: Subduction of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Tibetan Plateau and Burma, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 274, 157–168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.016</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, L., Liao, X., and Fu, R.: Slab breakoff depth: A slowdown subduction model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 11-11–11-13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013420</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liao, J. and Gerya, T.: Partitioning of crustal shortening during continental collision: 2-D thermomechanical modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 592–606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JB013398</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, M. and Yang, D. H.: How do pre-existing weak zones and rheological layering of the continental lithosphere influence the development and evolution of intra-continental subduction?, J. Asian Earth. Sci., 238, 105385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105385</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Yang, D. H., and Huangfu, P. P.: Effects of plate velocity slowdown on altering continental collision patterns and crustal-lithospheric deformation during the collision process, Front. Earth Sci., 10, 814710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.814710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2022.814710</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, M. X.: The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure in the evolution of orogenic systems: Application to the Himalayan-Tibetan collision zone, Version v2, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8076545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.8076545</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Sobolev, S. V., Babeyko, A. Y., and Pons, M.: Controls of the foreland formation pattern in the orogen-foreland shortening system: constraints from high-resolution geodynamic models, Tectonics, 41, e2021TC007121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021TC007121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021TC007121</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luth, S., Willingshofer, E., Sokoutis, D., and Cloetingh, S.: Analogue modelling of continental collision: Influence of plate coupling on mantle lithosphere subduction, crustal deformation and surface topography, Tectonophysics, 484, 87–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.043</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Macfarlane, A. M.: The tectonic evolution of the core of the Himalaya, Langtang National Park, central Nepal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60426</uri> (last access: 24 June 2023), 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Magni, V., Allen, M. B., van Hunen, J., and Bouilhol, P.: Continental underplating after slab break-off, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 474, 59–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nettesheim, M., Ehlers, T. A., Whipp, D. M., and Koptev, A.: The influence of upper-plate advance and erosion on overriding plate deformation in orogen syntaxes, Solid Earth, 9, 1207–1224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1207-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-9-1207-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pysklywec, R. N.: Evolution of subducting mantle lithosphere at a continental plate boundary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4399–4402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013567" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013567</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rybacki, E., Gottschalk, M., Wirth, R., and Dresen, G.: Influence of water fugacity and activation volume on the flow properties of fine-grained anorthite aggregates, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B03203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003663" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JB003663</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scaillet, B., France-Lanord, C., and Le Fort, P.: Badrinath-Gangotri plutons (Garhwal, India): petrological and geochemical evidence for fractionation processes in a high Himalayan leucogranite, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 44, 163–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(90)90017-A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0273(90)90017-A</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tang, J., Chen, L., Meng, Q., and Wu, G.: The effects of the thermal state of overriding continental plate on subduction dynamics: Two-dimensional thermal-mechanical modeling, Sci. China Earth Sci., 63, 1519–1539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9624-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-019-9624-1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Toussaint, G., Burov, E., and Jolivet, L.: Continental plate collision: Unstable vs. stable slab dynamics, Geology, 32, 33–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G19883.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G19883.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1168?><ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turcotte, D. L. and Schubert, G.: Geodynamics, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780511807442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511807442</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ueda, K., Gerya, T. V., and Burg, J.-P.: Delamination in collisional orogens: Thermomechanical modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B08202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JB009144</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van de Zedde, D. M. A. and Wortel, M. J. R.: Shallow slab detachment as a transient source of heat at midlithospheric depths, Tectonics, 20, 868–882, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC900018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001TC900018</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Hunen, J. and Allen, M. B.: Continental collision and slab break-off: A comparison of 3-D numerical models with observations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 302, 27–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Zelst, I., Crameri, F., Pusok, A. E., Glerum, A., Dannberg, J., and Thieulot, C.: 101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth, Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-13-583-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vidal, P., Cocherie, A., and Fort, P. L.: Geochemical investigations of the origin of the Manaslu leucogranite (Himalaya, Nepal), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 46, 2279–2292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(82)90201-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(82)90201-0</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vogt, K., Willingshofer, E., Matenco, L., Sokoutis, D., Gerya, T., and Cloetingh, S.: The role of lateral strength contrasts in orogenesis: A 2D numerical study, Tectonophysics, 746, 549–561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.08.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2017.08.010</ext-link>, 2018. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, C. Y., Mooney, W. D., Zhu, L., Wang, X., Lou, H., and You, H., Cao, Z., Chang, L., and Yao, Z.: Deep structure of the eastern himalayan collision zone: evidence for underthrusting and delamination in the postcollisional stage, Tectonics, 38, 3614–3628, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005483" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019TC005483</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., and Wobbe, F.: Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 94, 409–410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013EO450001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilks, K. R. and Carter, N. L.: Rheology of some continental lower crustal rocks, Tectonophysics, 182, 57–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Willingshofer, E. and Sokoutis, D.: Decoupling along plate boundaries: Key variable controlling the mode of deformation and the geometry of collisional mountain belts, Geology, 37, 39–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G25321A.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G25321A.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Yin, A. and Harrison, T. M.: Geologic Evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan Orogen, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 28, 211–280, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, H. W. and Murphy, M. A.: Tomographic evidence for wholesale underthrusting of india beneath the entire tibetan plateau, J. Asian Earth Sci., 25, 445–457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.04.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.04.007</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure  in the evolution of orogenic systems: application  to the Himalayan–Tibetan collision zone</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arndt, D., Bangerth, W., Blais, B., Fehling, M., Gassmöller, R., Heister, T., Heltai, L., Köcher, U., Kronbichler, M., Maier, M., Munch, P., Pelteret, J.-P., Proell, S., Simon, K., Turcksin, B., Wells, D., and Zhang, J.: The deal. II library, Version 9.3, J. Numer. Math., 29, 171–186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma-2021-0081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma-2021-0081</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beaumont, C., Fullsack, P., and Hamilton, J.: Styles of crustal deformation
in compressional orogens caused by subduction of the underlying lithosphere,
Tectonophysics, 232, 119–132, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90079-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90079-5</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burov, E. B.: Rheology and strength of the lithosphere, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 28, 1402–1443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.008</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chapman, D. S.: Thermal gradients in the continental crust, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 24, 63–70, <a href="https://doi.org/0.1144/GSL.SP.1986.024.01.07" target="_blank">https://doi.org/0.1144/GSL.SP.1986.024.01.07</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, L. and Gerya, T. V.: The role of lateral lithospheric strength
heterogeneities in orogenic plateau growth: Insights from 3-D thermo-mechanical modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid, 121, 3118–3138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012872</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, L., Song, X., D., Gerya, T., V., Xu, T., and Chen, Y.: Crustal melting beneath orogenic plateaus: Insights from 3-D thermo-mechanical modeling, Tectonophysics, 761, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.03.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.03.014</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Y., L, W., Yuan, X. H., Badal, J., and Teng, J. W.: Tearing of the Indian lithospheric slab beneath southern Tibet revealed by SKS-wave splitting measurements, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 413, 13–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.041</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davies, H. J. and von Blanckenburg, F.: Slab breakoff: A model of lithosphere detachment and its test in the magmatism and deformation of collisional orogens, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 129, 85–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(94)00237-S" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(94)00237-S</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, R. O. and Selvadurai, A. P. S.: Plasticity and Geomechanics, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 0521818303, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duretz, T. and Gerya, T. V.: Slab detachment during continental collision:
Influence of crustal rheology and interaction with lithospheric delamination, Tectonophysics, 602, 124–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.024</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duretz, T., Gerya, T. V., and May, D. A.: Numerical modelling of spontaneous
slab breakoff and subsequent topographic response, Tectonophysics, 502, 244–256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.024</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duretz, T., Schmalholz, S. M., and Gerya, T. V.: Dynamics of slab detachment, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 13, Q03020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC004024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC004024</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Faccenda, M., Gerya, T. V., and Chakraborty, S.: Styles of post-subduction
collisional orogeny: Influence of convergence velocity, crustal rheology and
radiogenic heat production, Lithos, 103, 257–287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.09.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.09.009</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerya, T. V., Yuen, D. A., and Maresch, W. V.: Thermomechanical modelling of
slab detachment, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 226, 101–116,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.022</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ghazian, R. K. and Buiter, S. J. H.: A numerical investigation of continental
collision styles, Geophys. J. Int., 193, 113—1152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt068</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gleason, G. C. and Tullis, J.: A flow law for dislocation creep of quartz
aggregates determined with the molten salt cell, Tectonophysics, 247, 1–23,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(95)00011-B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(95)00011-B</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glerum, A., Thieulot, C., Fraters, M., Blom, C., and Spakman, W.: Nonlinear
viscoplasticity in ASPECT: benchmarking and applications to subduction, Solid Earth, 9, 267–294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-267-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-267-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heron, P. J. and Pysklywec, R. N.: Inherited structure and coupled crust-mantle lithosphere evolution: Numerical models of Central Australia,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4962–4970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068562" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068562</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hirth, G. and Kohlstedt, D.: Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle wedge: A view from the experimentalists. Washington DC American Geophysical
Union Geophysical Monograph Series, 138, 83–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/138GM06" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/138GM06</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huangfu, P., Wang, Y., Fan, W., Li, Z., and Zhou, Y.: Dynamics of unstable
continental subduction: Insights from numerical modeling, Sci. China Earth
Sci., 60, 218–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5014-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5014-6</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huangfu, P., Li, Z. H., Fan, W., and Shi, Y.: Dynamics of crustal overthrust
versus underthrust in the continental collision zones: Numerical modelling,
Terra Nova, 31, 332–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12384</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karato, S.-I.: Deformation of Earth Materials: An Introduction to the
Rheology of Solid Earth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 9780511804892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804892</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karato, S.-I. and Wu, P.: Rheology of the upper mantle: A synthesis, Science, 260, 771–778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5109.771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5109.771</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koptev, A., Ehlers, T. A., Nettesheim, M., and Whipp, D. M.: Response of a
Rheologically stratified lithosphere to subduction of an indenter-shaped plate: Insights into localized exhumation at orogen syntaxes, Tectonics, 38, 1908–1930, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005455</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koptev, A., Nettesheim, M., and Ehlers, T. A.: Plate corner subduction and
rapid localized exhumation: Insights from 3D coupled geodynamic and geomorphological modelling, Terra Nova, 34, 210–223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12581" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12581</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kronbichler, M., Heister, T., and Bangerth, W.: High accuracy mantle convection simulation through modern numerical methods, Geophys. J. Int., 191, 12–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05609.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05609.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kufner S. K., Schurr, B., Sippl, C., Yuan, X. H., Ratschbacher, L., Akbar, A. M., Ischuk, A., Murodkulov, S., Schneider, F., Mechie, J., and Tilmann, F.: Deep india meets deep asia: lithospheric indentation, delamination and break-off under pamir and hindu kush (central asia), Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 435, 171–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.046</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kufner, S. K., Kakar, N., Bezada, M., Bloch, W., and Schurr, B.: The Hindu
Kush slab break-off as revealed by deep structure and crustal deformation,
Nat. Commun., 12, 1685, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21760-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21760-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, C., van der Hilst, R. D., Meltzer, A. S., and Engdahl, E. R.: Subduction
of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Tibetan Plateau and Burma, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 274, 157–168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.016</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, L., Liao, X., and Fu, R.: Slab breakoff depth: A slowdown subduction
model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 11-11–11-13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013420</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liao, J. and Gerya, T.: Partitioning of crustal shortening during continental collision: 2-D thermomechanical modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 592–606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013398</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M. and Yang, D. H.: How do pre-existing weak zones and rheological layering of the continental lithosphere influence the development and evolution of intra-continental subduction?, J. Asian Earth. Sci., 238, 105385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105385</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M., Yang, D. H., and Huangfu, P. P.: Effects of plate velocity slowdown
on altering continental collision patterns and crustal-lithospheric deformation during the collision process, Front. Earth Sci., 10, 814710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.814710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.814710</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M. X.: The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure in the evolution of orogenic systems: Application to the Himalayan-Tibetan collision zone, Version v2, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8076545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8076545</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, S., Sobolev, S. V., Babeyko, A. Y., and Pons, M.: Controls of the foreland formation pattern in the orogen-foreland shortening system: constraints from high-resolution geodynamic models, Tectonics, 41, e2021TC007121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021TC007121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021TC007121</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luth, S., Willingshofer, E., Sokoutis, D., and Cloetingh, S.: Analogue modelling of continental collision: Influence of plate coupling on mantle
lithosphere subduction, crustal deformation and surface topography,
Tectonophysics, 484, 87–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.043</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Macfarlane, A. M.: The tectonic evolution of the core of the Himalaya, Langtang National Park, central Nepal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/60426" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 June 2023), 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Magni, V., Allen, M. B., van Hunen, J., and Bouilhol, P.: Continental
underplating after slab break-off, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 474, 59–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nettesheim, M., Ehlers, T. A., Whipp, D. M., and Koptev, A.: The influence of upper-plate advance and erosion on overriding plate deformation in orogen syntaxes, Solid Earth, 9, 1207–1224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1207-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1207-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pysklywec, R. N.: Evolution of subducting mantle lithosphere at a continental
plate boundary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4399–4402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013567" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013567</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rybacki, E., Gottschalk, M., Wirth, R., and Dresen, G.: Influence of water
fugacity and activation volume on the flow properties of fine-grained anorthite aggregates, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B03203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003663" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003663</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scaillet, B., France-Lanord, C., and Le Fort, P.: Badrinath-Gangotri plutons
(Garhwal, India): petrological and geochemical evidence for fractionation
processes in a high Himalayan leucogranite, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 44,
163–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(90)90017-A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(90)90017-A</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, J., Chen, L., Meng, Q., and Wu, G.: The effects of the thermal state
of overriding continental plate on subduction dynamics: Two-dimensional
thermal-mechanical modeling, Sci. China Earth Sci., 63, 1519–1539,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9624-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9624-1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Toussaint, G., Burov, E., and Jolivet, L.: Continental plate collision: Unstable vs. stable slab dynamics, Geology, 32, 33–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G19883.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G19883.1</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Turcotte, D. L. and Schubert, G.: Geodynamics, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780511807442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ueda, K., Gerya, T. V., and Burg, J.-P.: Delamination in collisional orogens:
Thermomechanical modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B08202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009144" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009144</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
van de Zedde, D. M. A. and Wortel, M. J. R.: Shallow slab detachment as a transient source of heat at midlithospheric depths, Tectonics, 20, 868–882, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC900018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC900018</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Hunen, J. and Allen, M. B.: Continental collision and slab break-off: A
comparison of 3-D numerical models with observations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 302, 27–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Zelst, I., Crameri, F., Pusok, A. E., Glerum, A., Dannberg, J., and
Thieulot, C.: 101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and
communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth, Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vidal, P., Cocherie, A., and Fort, P. L.: Geochemical investigations of the
origin of the Manaslu leucogranite (Himalaya, Nepal), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 46, 2279–2292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(82)90201-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(82)90201-0</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogt, K., Willingshofer, E., Matenco, L., Sokoutis, D., Gerya, T., and Cloetingh, S.: The role of lateral strength contrasts in orogenesis: A 2D numerical study, Tectonophysics, 746, 549–561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.08.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.08.010</a>, 2018.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, C. Y., Mooney, W. D., Zhu, L., Wang, X., Lou, H., and You, H., Cao, Z., Chang, L., and Yao, Z.: Deep structure of the eastern himalayan collision zone: evidence for underthrusting and delamination in the postcollisional stage, Tectonics, 38, 3614–3628, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005483" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005483</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., and Wobbe, F.: Generic
Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 94, 409–410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilks, K. R. and Carter, N. L.: Rheology of some continental lower crustal
rocks, Tectonophysics, 182, 57–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Willingshofer, E. and Sokoutis, D.: Decoupling along plate boundaries: Key
variable controlling the mode of deformation and the geometry of collisional
mountain belts, Geology, 37, 39–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G25321A.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G25321A.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, A. and Harrison, T. M.: Geologic Evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan
Orogen, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 28, 211–280, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, H. W. and Murphy, M. A.: Tomographic evidence for wholesale underthrusting of india beneath the entire tibetan plateau, J. Asian Earth
Sci., 25, 445–457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.04.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.04.007</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
