<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-15-1479-2024</article-id><title-group><article-title>Importance of basement faulting and salt decoupling for the structural evolution of the Fars Arc (Zagros fold-and-thrust belt): a numerical modeling approach</article-title><alt-title>Basement faulting and salt decoupling in the Fars Arc: numerical modeling</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gomar</surname><given-names>Fatemeh</given-names></name>
          <email>fatemehgomar@iasbs.ac.ir</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3660-8424</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ruh</surname><given-names>Jonas B.</given-names></name>
          <email>jruh@icm.csic.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7035-1453</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Najafi</surname><given-names>Mahdi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-4053</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sobouti</surname><given-names>Farhad</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, Zanjan, 45137-66731, Iran</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Marine Sciences, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 08003 Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Geosciences Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, GEO3BCN-CSIC, 08028 Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Fatemeh Gomar (fatemehgomar@iasbs.ac.ir) and Jonas B. Ruh (jruh@icm.csic.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>December</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>1479</fpage><lpage>1507</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>April</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>October</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>October</month><year>2024</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>May</month><year>2024</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2024 Fatemeh Gomar et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e125">Understanding the tectonic evolution and crustal-scale structure of fold-and-thrust belts is crucial for exploring geological resources and evaluating seismic hazards. We conducted a series of two-dimensional finite difference thermomechanical numerical models with a visco–elasto–plastic/brittle rheology to decipher how the interaction between inherited basement faults and salt décollement levels control the deformation process and structural style of the Fars Arc in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt during tectonic inversion. Numerical experiments with extension and consequent convergence phases indicate that strain accumulation patterns during initial rifting are controlled by the location and geometry of the prescribed faults. During convergence, the inverted basement faults form large-wavelength and foreland-verging fault-propagation anticlines in the sedimentary cover, while the thick salt layer promotes the growth of second-order detachment anticlines accompanied by both fore- and back-limb thrust faults. Experiments without prescribed basement faults result in dispersed brittle/plastic deformation during rifting and convergence and an effective mechanical decoupling along the salt horizon. Overall, reactivated faults can serve as pathways for stress transfer, resulting in the formation of new faults triggering seismic activity. The structural evolution of orogenic belts like the Zagros does not adhere to a fixed pattern; it is shaped by factors such as basement rock properties and inherited fault orientations. Shallow earthquakes predominantly occur along décollement anticlines in the sedimentary cover, while deeper and larger ones are associated with basement faults. We also observe variations in resistance to deformation based on salt rheology and fault geometry, with listric faults minimizing resistance. The degree of basement involvement directly influences the model's resistance to deformation, with greater involvement facilitating easier deformation. Our results, related to the temporal and spatial relationship between thin- and thick-skinned tectonics, can work as analogues for similar orogenic belts worldwide, such as Taiwan, the Pyrenees, the Alps, the Appalachians, and the Kopet Dagh.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e137">Fold-and-thrust belts are complex tectonic domains formed in response to near- or far-field compressional stress fields in the Earth's crust. Multiple factors have been identified to control the structural styles in these belts, such as the strength of the involved rocks (Davis et al., 1983), the involvement of the crystalline basement and its pre-existing faults (Pfiffner, 2017; Barchi and Tavarelli, 2022), the occurrence and rheology of décollement layers (Ruh et al., 2012; Pla et al., 2019; Eslamirezaei  et al., 2023), and the intensity of surface processes (Talbot and Alavi, 1996; Cooper, 2007; Simpson, 2010; Malavieille and Konstantinovskaya, 2010; Morley et al., 2011; McQuarrie and Ehlers, 2017). In particular, the presence of décollements, mechanically weak layers composed of rocks that have lower mechanical strength than their surroundings, plays a significant role in the formation and evolution of fold-and-thrust belts. These layers are weak stratigraphic horizons that separate and mechanically decouple layers of greater strength and tend to accommodate and localize the deformation (Koyi and Mansurbeg, 2021). The relative weakness of décollement levels arises from variations in lithology (i.e., layer-parallel décollements) or structural features (i.e., inherited faults) that often promote the localization of deformation as a result of increased stress contrasts and lower strength thresholds (Vogt et al., 2017; Borderie et al., 2018). The lithology of a décollement layer (salt, anhydrite, gypsum, or shale), its stratigraphic position in the rock sequence (basal or middle), its thickness, and its fluid content control the distribution and geometry of faulting and folding during crustal convergence (Simpson, 2009; Ruh et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014; Santolaria et al., 2022). Décollement layers with a certain thickness may lead to the formation of single-layer detachment folds (Mitra, 2003; Wallace and Homza, 1998). Furthermore, multiple  décollement horizons within a shortened sedimentary sequence may connect along thrust faults and form structural ramp–flat geometries (Boyer and Elliott, 1982; Dal Zilio, 2020).</p>
      <p id="d2e140">Besides weak layers within the stratigraphy, pre-existing basement faults, inherited from older tectonic events, can influence the location and geometry of new faults and folds and their propagation and termination in the overlying sedimentary cover by serving as zones of weakness during compressional deformation. This ultimately affects the overall structural architecture of a fold-and-thrust belt (Bonini et al., 2012; Granado and Ruh, 2019; Parizot et al., 2022). The effects of fault inheritance can be complex and dependent on various factors, such as the orientation, dip, geometry, and depth of the inherited structures (White et al., 1986), the timing and style of subsequent deformation (Zwaan et al., 2022), and the mechanical properties of the rocks involved (Ruh and Vergés, 2018).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e145"><bold>(a)</bold> Overview of the geotectonic situation of Iran. <bold>(b)</bold> Main tectonic features in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt located along the northeastern margin of the Arabian Plate. <bold>(c)</bold> Regional geological cross section, showing the crustal geometry (modified from Etemad-Saeed et al., 2020; Najafi et al., 2021; Najafi and Lajmorak, 2020).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e163">The Fars Arc, located in the southeastern part of the Zagros orogen (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>), offers an ideal area to study the combined influence of the cover's mechanical stratigraphy. and basement inheritance. It is a typical example of a fold-and-thrust belt that contains multiple mechanically weak stratigraphic layers in the Phanerozoic sedimentary cover, as well as pre-existing inherited faults in the Precambrian crustal basement (Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Mouthereau et al., 2006; Yamato et al., 2011; Karasözen et al., 2019; Najafi et al., 2021). According to seismic, well-logging, and surface geological data, the Ediacaran–Lower Cambrian Hormuz series constitutes the main décollement in the Fars Arc. It consists of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of salt-bearing evaporites, with minor carbonate and shale layers, and decouples the crustal basement from the overlying sedimentary cover (Kent, 1958; Sherkati et al., 2005; Callot et al., 2007; Leturmy et al., 2010). The presence of a thick salt layer at the base of the sedimentary cover in the Fars Arc is responsible for short-wavelength folds (Mouthereau et al., 2006). In some places, its basal décollement is spatially interrupted by basement faults related to the Cenozoic convergence (Kent, 1958; Talbot and Alavi, 1996; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Sherkati et al., 2005; Callot et al., 2007). The recent activity of these faults in the Fars Arc is documented by seismological data (Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian and King, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Tatar et al., 2004; Karasözen et al., 2019; Nissen et al., 2019). Focal mechanisms of seismic events in the basement exhibit rather steep fault dip angles, suggesting the reactivation of inherited normal faults (Jackson, 1980).</p>
      <p id="d2e183">In the Fars Arc, the activity of inherited faults has influenced the progression of deformation towards the foreland, with the Mountain Front Fault being associated with basement thrusting (Bahroudi and Koyi, 2003; Mouthereau et al., 2006, 2007a; Yamato et al., 2011; Ruh et al., 2014; Najafi et al., 2021). According to Mouthereau et al. (2006), basement deformation and thickening play a critical role in the Zagros Folded Belt, helping to explain the observed topographic growth. They also emphasize that the reactivation of pre-existing faults during the early stages of compression in the Zagros foredeep suggests a significant influence of inherited structural features on present-day deformation. Balanced cross sections support this by demonstrating that basement involvement is necessary to account for varying base topographic elevations in Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations (Blanc et al., 2003; Molinaro et al., 2005; Mouthereau et al., 2007a). However, other studies propose that the most substantial impact of basement deformation on surface structures occurred later in the region's tectonic history, particularly during the Pliocene and Pleistocene (Molinaro et al., 2005; Sherkati et al., 2005; Tavani et al., 2018; Vergés et al., 2011; Najafi et al., 2018; Etemad-saeed et al., 2020). It is widely accepted that the high-angle reverse faults initially formed as normal faults in the Arabian basement during the Permian–Triassic rifting of the Neo-Tethys Ocean (Navabpour et al., 2010), remaining inactive through the Jurassic to Late Cretaceous passive margin phase before being reactivated during the Cenozoic collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates.</p>
      <p id="d2e186">Various 2D numerical modeling studies have investigated the evolution of fold-and-thrust belts and salt-bearing basins. Nilforoushan et al. (2013) demonstrated the influence of geothermal gradients and basement mineralogy on fault geometry and basement reactivation in the Fars Arc, emphasizing the role of weak salt horizons in mechanical decoupling. Heydarzadeh et al. (2020) analyzed factors such as sedimentation rates, erosion, and salt layer properties in Dehdasht Basin, highlighting the importance of balanced surface processes and deformation rates. Humair et al. (2020) conducted simulations to study the interaction of folding and thrusting during the Swiss Jura and Canadian Foothills fold-and-thrust belt evolution, focusing on the effects of layer-parallel shortening and initial geometrical perturbations. Their work showed that the magnitude of these perturbations influences whether folding or thrusting predominates, affecting the structural evolution and asymmetry of anticlines. Spitz et al. (2020) conducted 3D thermomechanical numerical simulations to investigate the influence of laterally variable inherited structures on fold-and-thrust belt evolution and nappe formation on the Helvetic nappe system. The study demonstrated the fundamental importance of tectonic inheritance on fold-and-thrust belt evolution, with strain localization, folding, and nappe transport controlled by initial geometrical and mechanical heterogeneities. Almost all studies have focused on examining the collisional phase and deformation resulting from compression in the fold belts and the Fars Arc, while the earlier extensional history and its effect on later deformation have received less attention (e.g., Granado and Ruh, 2019). Incorporating a rifting phase into the model setup results in more realistic initial conditions for the convergence stage, featuring variations in crustal thickness, rift-related sedimentary basins, and the presence of weak zones.</p>
      <p id="d2e189">The interaction of the basal décollement level and the pre-existing basement faults and their combined influence on the distribution of thin- and thick-skinned tectonic styles in the Fars Arc during extensional and compressional phases are not fully understood yet. Understanding these processes is crucial for improving our geological models of the region, which have significant implications for hydrocarbon exploration. Although there is a general consensus on the importance of the décollement layer and basement faults, the detailed dynamics and their broader impact on regional tectonics require further investigation during inversion tectonics.</p>
      <p id="d2e192">The goal of our study is to test the impact of the Hormuz salt and the mechanical properties and geometries of the basement faults inherited from the Permian continental rifting on the structural evolution of the Fars Arc. To achieve this goal, we conducted a series of two-dimensional thermomechanical numerical experiments to investigate how the presence or absence of fault inheritance (planar or listric) controls the deformation during rifting and subsequent tectonic shortening. Furthermore, we test the effect of a weak intermediate salt décollement of variable rheology on the structural evolution during convergence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Geotectonic and geological setting</title>
      <p id="d2e203">The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt (ZFTB) is a NW–SE-trending orogenic belt that resulted from the convergence and continental collision between Arabian and Eurasian plates (Agard et al., 2011; Mouthereau et al., 2012; Vergés et al., 2024). The ZFTB extends over approximately 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Taurus Mountains in Türkiye in the northwest to the Makran accretionary wedge in southeastern Iran (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Across-strike, the ZFTB is bounded by the Main Zagros Thrust (i.e., the inherited suture of the old subduction zone) in the northeast, and by the Zagros Frontal Fault system in the southwest (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d2e218">The NE margin of the Arabian Plate has been shaped by a series of tectonic events that ultimately resulted in the emergence of the ZFTB (Agard et al., 2011; Vergés et al., 2024; Madanipour et al., 2024), namely (1) the Permian–Triassic rifting and opening of the NW–SE-trending Neo-Tethys Ocean, (2) the Jurassic–Late Cretaceous passive marginal stage, (3) the Late Cretaceous ophiolite obduction, (4) the Oligocene soft continental collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates, and (5) the middle Miocene-to-recent folding propagation across the mountain range.</p>
      <p id="d2e221">The Permian–Triassic opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean separated the Arabian Plate to the southwest from the Iranian microplate to the northeast (Szabo and Kheradpir, 1978; Berberian and King, 1981; Agard et al., 2005). Lithospheric  extension related to continental rifting deformed the Arabian crystalline basement and produced a series of NW-trending half-grabens parallel to the current orientation of the Zagros orogen (e.g., Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Mouthereau et al., 2007a). Following the rifting episode, the Arabian margin became passive during the Jurassic and Cretaceous (e.g., Alavi, 2004; Agard et al., 2005). An early stage of contractional deformation occurred in the Late Cretaceous with the obduction of the Neo-Tethys ophiolite and radiolarite slices onto the Arabian margin, presently preserved in Kermanshah, Neyriz, and Hajiabad (Agard et al., 2005; Saura et al., 2011; Bernaola et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d2e224">From the Oligocene onward, continental collision led to the formation of the ZFTB, while being age-constrained by recent thermochronometric and magnetostratigraphic data (Pirouz et al., 2017; Koshnaw et al., 2019; Barber et al., 2019). The main phase of folding in the Zagros took place during the Miocene to Pleistocene and progressively propagated to the SW (Hessami et al., 2001; Khadivi et al., 2010; Mouthereau et al., 2012; Ruh et al., 2014; Vergés et al., 2019; Najafi et al., 2021). GPS measurements indicate that the present-day convergence rate is approximately 20–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a roughly N–S direction, of which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is being consumed across the Zagros (Nilforoushan et al., 2003; Walpersdorf et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d2e276">Based on its structural and stratigraphic characterizations, the Zagros is divided into the High Zagros imbricated zone in the NE and the Zagros Simply Folded Belt (ZSFB) in the SW and separated by the High Zagros Fault (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The ZSFB extends to the Persian Gulf and the present-day Mesopotamian foredeep basin. It represents the deformed foreland of the orogeny and displays elongated folds of regular wavelength (Falcon, 1974; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Mouthereau et al., 2006). The ZSFB consists of a sedimentary sequence 8–14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick covering metamorphosed rocks of the Precambrian Arabian basement (Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Lacombe et al., 2011). Based on lateral stratigraphic and structural variations, the ZSFB is divided from NW to SE into the Lurestan Arc, the Izeh zone, the Dezful Embayment, and the Fars Arc (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e291">In this study, we focus on the Fars Arc, the largest tectonic domain of the ZSFB that is limited by the Kazerun–Borazjan segmented dextral fault system to the west and the Minab–Zendan–Palami fault system to the east (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b; Regard et al., 2004; Lacombe et al., 2011). The Fars Arc extends over more than 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across-strike, is  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wide from the High Zagros Fault to the deformation front, and developed as a result of folding of the thick sedimentary cover (Stöcklin, 1974; Berberian and King, 1981). Its elongated folds show a distinctive periodic pattern, with axial lengths reaching to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and wavelengths of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Najafi et al., 2021). The Fars Arc is scattered with salt diapirs, with a majority of them located in the eastern part of the arc (Sherkati et al., 2006; Callot et al., 2007).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e347">Stratigraphic column of the sedimentary cover in the Fars Arc (modified from Callot et al., 2007; Jahani et al., 2009; Motamedi et al., 2012; Mouthereau et al., 2007; Najafi et al., 2014; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Sherkati et al., 2006). Violet and red lithologies represent regional décollement horizons.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e356">The stratigraphy of the Fars Arc contains a major basal layer and several minor intermediate mechanically weak décollement layers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Near the base of the sedimentary cover, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick salt-bearing evaporites of Hormuz Formation of Ediacaran–Early Cambrian age overlay early Ediacaran sediments (Callot et al., 2007). The 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick Paleozoic sequence is dominantly composed of sandstone, dolomite, and shale. The Dehram Group, with a thickness of more than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was deposited during the Permian–Triassic. The Triassic Dashtak Formation of 550–850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thickness overlies the Dehram Group and is the minor intermediate décollement level in the frontal Fars Arc (Motamedi et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014). It laterally grades into the dolomites of the Khaneh Kat Formation in the interior of the range, where it loses its efficiency as a décollement level (Szabo and Kheradpir, 1978). During the passive marginal stage in the Jurassic–Late Cretaceous, the Zagros basin was characterized by a shallow-marine environment, when the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick carbonate and minor detrital and evaporite successions of the Khami and Bangestan groups were deposited (Sharp et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d2e409">The Neo-Tethyan oceanic crust was obducted over the Arabian Plate margin during the Late Cretaceous, and loading resulted in the flexure of the Arabian lithosphere. This produced an early foreland basin in the Lurestan region of NW Zagros, referred to as the Amiran foreland basin by Homke et al. (2009) and Saura et al. (2011). The thick successions of deep-water shales of the Paleocene to Eocene formations indicate regional subsidence. The passive margin succession of the Paleocene to Miocene sediments has a thickness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jahani et al., 2009; Najafi et al., 2014). In the Oligocene, the Asmari Formation was deposited over the Pabdeh Formation in the Fars region. The post-Asmari clastics, known as the Fars Group, including the Gachsaran, Mishan, and Aghajari formations (early Miocene to Pliocene), have a total thickness of about 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Migration of the Aghajari–Bakhtyari sedimentary system towards the foreland and the propagation of folding were in sequence. They have migrated at a rate of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Fars Arc and 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Lurestan Arc during the last 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ruh et al., 2014; Vergés et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d2e479">In the Fars Arc, two main décollement levels occur in the stratigraphy (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>); the Hormuz Formation represents the basal and the major décollement level, and the evaporites of the Dashtak Formation constitute a minor intermediate décollement level (Callot et al., 2012; Motamedi et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d2e484">Seismic activity at mid-crustal depths provides key evidence of basement involvement in the Zagros. Most earthquake centroid depths range from 4 to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, affecting both the basement and cover, with many exhibiting reverse focal mechanisms (Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Karasözen et al., 2019). In the Fars Arc, the major inherited basement reverse faults from SW to NE include the Mountain Front Fault, the Surmeh Fault, the High Zagros Fault, and the Main Zagros Thrust (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). A geological cross section of the Fars Arc reveals evidence of both thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonic deformation occurring simultaneously (Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Najafi et al., 2021; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). This deformation is expressed through large-scale detachment folds and forced folds (Jackson, 1980; Lacombe et al., 2011; Mouthereau et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e499">While numerous studies have focused on the Zagros fold-and-thrust belts and the Fars Arc, several crucial aspects of the Fars Arc's geological evolution remain poorly understood. Specifically, the exact mechanisms and timing of basement involvement, the interaction between basement faults and salt décollements during tectonic inversion, and the relative influence of thin-skinned versus thick-skinned tectonics on the overall structural evolution are still unresolved (Mouthereau et al., 2006, 2012). To address these uncertainties, we employ a numerical model that simulates the full tectonic history of the Fars Arc, including both an initial extensional phase and a subsequent compressional phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Numerical model</title>
      <p id="d2e510">In order to investigate the role of inherited extensional faults and mechanically weak décollement horizons in the structural evolution of the Fars Arc, a series of numerical experiments were conducted. We apply the two-dimensional finite difference numerical code “Norma” (Ruh et al., 2022), with a fully staggered Eulerian grid, freely moving Lagrangian markers (marker-in-cell technique; Gerya, 2019), and a temperature-dependent visco–elasto–plastic/brittle rheology.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Governing equations</title>
      <p id="d2e520">The numerical code solves for the conservation of mass and momentum (the Stokes equation) on a Eulerian grid to calculate the velocity and pressure fields
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M28" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are velocities and spatial coordinates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the dynamic pressure (mean stress), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the deviatoric stresses, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the density (constant), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the gravitational acceleration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Temperature is solved by considering the energy conservation on the Eulerian grid,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is isobaric heat capacity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total time derivative, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is time, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the thermal conductivity coefficient. Additional heat production, such as radioactive heating and shear heating, is not activated in the presented experiments due to the geometrical constraints of the model setup and related boundary conditions that affect the diffusion of such secondary heat production.</p>
      <p id="d2e825">The pressure and temperature fields calculated from the governing equations are interpolated onto the Lagrangian markers based on a linear distance-weighted scheme (Gerya, 2019). The Lagrangian markers store all material properties and advect through the Eulerian grid based on a fourth-order Runge–Kutta interpolation of the calculated two-directional Eulerian velocity field.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Rheological model</title>
      <p id="d2e836">The numerical code employs a visco–elasto–plastic/brittle rheology, where viscoelasticity is implemented by a Maxwell-type expression. Elasticity plays a key role in capturing short-term stress accumulation and release, which is crucial for fault and fold behavior. The Maxwell model allows the simulation of the immediate elastic response and long-term viscous flow, ensuring that important transient phenomena such as fault reactivation and seismic activity are accurately represented during both extension and convergence. The strain rate of a Maxwell body under stress consists of viscous and elastic components,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the elastic shear (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all materials here), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective viscosity. First-order finite differences in time are used to represent the objective co-rotational time derivatives of the viscoelastic stresses as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e983">The effective viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated from the non-Newtonian dislocation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>disl</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, creep equation,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>disl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the gas constant, the pre-exponential factor, the power law constant, and the thermal activation energy, respectively. Elastic behavior is achieved by updating the effective viscosity in response to an elastic time step (Maxwell time; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 years) and the stress history (Gerya and Yuen, 2007; Moresi et al., 2007, 2003). The updated viscoelastic deviatoric stresses are defined by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>old</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M63" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>disl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1254">The effective viscosity is multiplied by this viscoelastic factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to obtain a numerical viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>num</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be used for solving the set of equations as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>num</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>disl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>disl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>disl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1340">Plastic failure occurs if the second invariant of the viscoelastic stress tensor exceeds the yield stress, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, following a pressure-dependent Drucker–Prager criterion:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the pressure (mean stress), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, are the cohesion, friction angle, and the fluid pressure ratio of the bulk material, respectively. The components of stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the normal stress component, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the shear stress component) and the viscosity are then updated as

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> and  if </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>yield</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> and  if </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>yield</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E13"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>13</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> and  if </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>yield</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> and  if </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>yield</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>14</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mtext>num</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext> if </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>yield</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1753">The viscosities, including the viscoelastic effect and the plastic failure, are calculated on the Lagrangian markers and interpolated onto the Eulerian nodes using a distance-weighted scheme. To ensure numerical stability, they are capped by lower and upper cutoffs of 10<sup>17</sup> and 10<sup>25</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Given the numerical time step of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 years, material undergoing deformation at viscosities below 3.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be considered predominantly viscous, while deformation at viscosities above 3.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>21</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is to a significant part elastic and thus reversible. Elastic relaxation time varies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 year and 1 million years, depending on the viscosity of the material, which results in Deborah numbers of 10<sup>−7</sup>–0.1 for a deformation period of 10 million years.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1882">Setup and boundary conditions of numerical modeling. <bold>(a)</bold> Initial compositional setup for extension phase with listric faults. <bold>(b)</bold> Fully extended model (5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with listric faults before convergence. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the horizontal velocity, vertical velocity, and basement horizontal velocity, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1947">Applied rheological parameters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Rock type </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (°)<sup><italic>†</italic></sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<sup><italic>†</italic></sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Sticky air </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10<sup>−17</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">200</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>6</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Sediments<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−18</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">154</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2500</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 (0.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Syn-rift sediments<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−18</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">154</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2500</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30 (20)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 (0.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Paleozoic series<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−18</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">154</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2700</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30 (20)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1 (0.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Salt layer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Non-linear<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">1.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−39</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">32.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6" morerows="1">2200</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7" morerows="1">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8" morerows="1">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9" morerows="1">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10" morerows="1">2.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11" morerows="1">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Linear</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10<sup>−18</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Basement rock<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−20</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">276</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2800</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30 (20)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10 (0.1)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Basement fault<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−20</sup></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">276</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2800</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>3</sup></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1950"><sup>a</sup> Quartzite (Ranalli and Murphy, 1987; Stöckhert et al., 1999). <sup>b</sup> Rock salt (Li and Urai, 2012). <sup>c</sup> Diabase (Wilks and Carter, 1990). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">†</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Values in parentheses indicate strain weakened value.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Initial geometrical setup</title>
      <p id="d2e2791">The model domain is defined by a box of 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> width and 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> height (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). The Eulerian grid consists of 1001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 121 nodes, with a nodal resolution of  500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The initial marker distribution defines, from bottom up, (1) a 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick crustal basement layer, given the depth of basement crustal detachment (Vergés et al., 2011; Kendall et al., 2020); (2) a mechanically weak salt horizon emplaced between 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; (3) a 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick Paleozoic sequence based on the stratigraphy of the Fars Arc; and (4) a 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick low-density and low-viscosity sticky-air layer to simulate a free surface, allowing for the vertical growth of the evolving fold-and-thrust belt (Crameri et al., 2012). The thickness of the salt layer varies in different models in order to examine its impact on the structural evolution. Some experiments include three inherited basement faults located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100, 200, and 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (top of the basement), which dip at an angle of 50° at their top towards the hinterland (Mouthereau et al., 2006). These weak zones may either have a listric or planar geometry. The rheological parameters used in the experiments are provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Strain weakening is implemented by a linear decrease in the values for the frictional angle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and cohesion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between a lower  and upper strain threshold as defined by the second invariant of the strain tensor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>II</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2970">The initial temperature field is characterized by a linear temperature increase with depth, starting from 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the interface between rock and sticky air and reaching 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the bottom, which is in agreement with a constant geothermal gradient of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inferred from paleothermal data (Aldega et al., 2018) and a relatively thick lithosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) beneath the Zagros (Jiménez-Munt et al., 2012; Priestley et al., 2012; Tunini et al., 2014). Applying a linear geotherm is a reasonable simplification for the uppermost <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the continental lithosphere (Hasterok and Chapman, 2011; Goes et al., 2020). Each Eulerian cell initially contains 16 randomly distributed Lagrangian markers carrying rock information and properties. If the finite spatial domains of a specific node become empty of any Lagrangian marker, the previous interpolated parameters are applied for solving the system of equation of this particular node.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e3050">The numerical experiments simulate the deformation of the NE margin of the Arabian Plate during Permian–Triassic rifting and Oligocene–recent continental collision. Tectonic quiescence affects the thermal state and, consequently, the rheological behavior of the rocks. However, we assume that the temperature field reached a steady state by the onset of the collision phase to simplify the model setup. This implementation allows us to effectively capture the relevant thermal conditions, while maintaining focus on the critical dynamics of the extension and collision phases. The velocity boundary conditions are prescribed in a way to simulate the tectonic inversion of the rifted margin, including the initial extension and subsequent convergence. During the rifting phase, an outward horizontal boundary velocity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is applied on the right side of the model domain, while the left boundary is kept fixed in horizontal direction (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). The bottom boundary has zero vertical velocity, and the top boundary has an incoming vertical velocity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ensuring the conservation of the volume within the model domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). On all boundaries, free-slip conditions (zero shear stress) are prescribed. The finite Eulerian domain impedes elastic bending of the lower boundary, affecting the resulting surface taper angles compared to the ZFTB (Mouthereau et al., 2006; McQuarrie, 2004). The extension phase is applied for a period of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in a total extension of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During this period, the rift basin is allowed to be filled with syn-rift deposits (equivalent to the Dashtak and Dehram formations). Following the extension phase, 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of sediments representing the depositional environment during the tectonic quiescence and subsidence period are added onto the existing stratigraphy (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). These sediments represent the Khami and Bangestan groups and the Gurpi and Pabdeh formations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The Late Cretaceous ophiolite obduction episode has affected only some parts of the Arabian margin, namely the Kermanshah, Neyriz, Hajiabad, and Oman regions. We have not included the Late Cretaceous deformation in our modeling, as it accounts for just a few percent of the observed shortening in the ZSFB (e.g., Saura et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d2e3157">Crustal shortening in the experiments is simulated by imposing a horizontal velocity of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the bottom and the left side of the domain. The right side acts as a partial backstop by allowing the basement part of the crust to escape the model but prevents the sedimentary cover from exiting. For the lower part of the right boundary (basement), different horizontal velocities between 0 and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are tested (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). This arrangement permits us to vary the degree of basement involvement and to study the development of thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonics in the model. The compressional phase ran for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accommodating a total shortening of 25 % (i.e., 125 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), This amount offsets the 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extension during the extensional phase and the 20 % shortening during the collisional phase, comparable to estimates for the SE Zagros (McQuarrie, 2004; Motamedi et al., 2012; Pirouz et al., 2017; Najafi et al., 2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Surface processes</title>
      <p id="d2e3229">The surface processes of sedimentation and erosion during the evolution of the models are simulated by applying diffusion of the rock–air interface. We used the following diffusion equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M190" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface topography, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes a diffusion constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<sup>−6</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal coordinate. The left and right sides of the surface line prescribe free-slip boundaries.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3362">List of the numerical models.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Salt rheology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fault geometry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Basement</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Figures</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">thickness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">velocity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 14, S1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(reference model)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6, 8, 12, S2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6, 8, 12, 13, S3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Linear (10<sup>18</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7, 8, 12, S4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Linear (10<sup>20</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7, 8, 12, S5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Planar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9, 12, S6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No fault</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9, 12, S7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10, 12, S8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10, 12, S9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10, 12, S10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model 11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Non-linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Listric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10, 12, S11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results of modeling</title>
      <p id="d2e3782">A total of 11 experiments is presented to investigate the role of basement involvement and the impact of salt rheology and thickness on the structural evolution of the Fars Arc. Experiments are divided into four series, varying in (1) the thickness of the salt layer, (2) the rheology of the salt layer, (3) the existence and geometry of pre-existing basement faults, and (4) the degree involvement of the basement during convergence (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). While the numerical model is based on a viscous formulation and thus develops localized shear zones, we refer to them as faults if they form due to the implemented Drucker–Prager failure criterion (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>). First, we present the temporal evolution of the reference model to which the rest of the models are compared. All experiments undergo extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by compression for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A link to videos (graphics interchange format, GIF) of all numerical experiments can be found in the “Data availability” section.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3807">Temporal evolution of the reference model during extensional <bold>(a–c)</bold> and compressional <bold>(d–f)</bold> phases. For each time panel, the compositional layers (top) are derived from the Lagrangian markers, and the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor (bottom) is shown.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Evolution of the reference model</title>
      <p id="d2e3829">The reference model (Model 1) has an initial 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick salt horizon with a power law viscous rheology (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The basement exhibits three inherited listric fault zones and is shortened at the same rate as the sedimentary cover during convergence. The extensional phase is characterized by the development of half-graben basins forming along the listric basement faults that are filled by syn-extensional deposits (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a–c and S1 in the Supplement). The second invariant of the strain-rate tensor shows that the fastest deformation occurs along the pre-existing weak zones. During extension, all three inherited faults are simultaneously active and without any recognizable preference. Normal fault deformation along the basement faults propagates upward into the post-salt strata, inducing typical half-grabens and the bending of the hanging wall (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and S1).</p>
      <p id="d2e3848">After compression for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the cover sequence mainly deforms between the right backstop and the salt pinch-out at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d and S1). The basement fault closest to the backstop has experienced a significant amount of reverse motion and has caused a large step of several kilometers in the salt décollement geometry. Faulting of the sedimentary cover mainly develops where the syn-rift strata are the thinnest, i.e., in front of the basement thrusts. Strain localization occurs along the basement faults, and in the case of the frontal fault (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), it cuts across the strata overlying the salt layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d and S1). Towards the backstop, the deformation in the basement and the cover sequence is decoupled along the weak salt horizon.</p>
      <p id="d2e3908">As convergence progresses (10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the basement fault at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> undergoes inversion and creates a ramp–flat–ramp geometry (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e and S1). Basement fault propagation deforms the syn-extensional strata and forms harpoon-like anticlines within the sedimentary cover. The syn-tectonic sedimentation concentrates within multiple structural basins between the developing anticlines. The salt layer decouples the deformation between the basement faulting and the sedimentary cover folding, allowing for more amplification within the sedimentary cover. Strain rates indicate intense deformation within the basement, which particularly localizes along the inverted normal faults, as well as the basal décollement level. The strain-rate pattern starts to gradually diffuse below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, indicating the transition from brittle to ductile deformation in the lower crust (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f and S1).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3964">Second invariant of the stress tensor and viscosity after full extension <bold>(a, b)</bold> and full convergence <bold>(d, e)</bold>. Vertically averaged viscosity of the non-linear salt horizon after an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> and a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(f)</bold>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4002">Patterns of the second invariant of the stress tensor after the extensional phase and after full convergence indicate an increase in stress with depth down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is where the brittle-to-ductile transition begins (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and d). The lower part of the basement displays low stresses, given its lower viscosities and ductile nature (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b and e). Viscosity plots furthermore indicate the position of the low-viscous décollement and basement thrusts.</p>
      <p id="d2e4047">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c illustrates the vertically averaged viscosity of the non-Newtonian salt horizon after an extension of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is influenced by the temperature and strain rate (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>; Li and Urai, 2016). During the extension and the formation of half-grabens along pre-existing faults, the strain-rate and temperature increase in these areas. Consequently, these regions exhibit the lowest viscosities (10<sup>18</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to the locations of the basement faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c). In areas without strain localization within the cover sequence, the viscosity shows larger values (10<sup>19</sup>–10<sup>20</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). After an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the half-graben basins are covered by post-rift deposits prior to the onset of convergence. After 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the intensity of thin-skinned folding within the sedimentary cover increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f). The development of long-wavelength folds is influenced by the reactivation of basement faults, which exert a significant impact on the deformation of the upper crustal region. The frontal basement fault is influenced by the salt pinch-out and overthrusts the post-rift strata, whereas the other two faults undergo a transition to a ramp–flat–ramp configuration. In the post-rift sediments, new shear zones are formed along the continuation of the pre-existing faults. These faults have been displaced due to the presence of basal salt, leading to deviation from their original dip. Strain rates indicate that the continuity of the salt décollement is disrupted due to the offset introduced by the inherited faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f). The largest viscosities of salt are found in the anticlines with long wavelengths that form in the areas between two pre-existing faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f). In contrast, lower viscosities are observed in areas where the strain rate reaches its maximum, specifically at the tip of the basement faults where the salt layer is thin.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4139">Composition inferred from Lagrangian markers and the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor affected by the salt thickness after an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a, b)</bold> In the absence of salt layer. <bold>(c, d)</bold> In the presence of a salt layer with 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thickness.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4180">Composition inferred from Lagrangian markers and the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor affected by different viscosity for the linear salt layer after an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a, b)</bold> Linear salt horizon with 10<sup>18</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> viscosity. <bold>(c, d)</bold> Linear salt horizon with 10<sup>20</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> viscosity.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Effect of salt thickness</title>
      <p id="d2e4261">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the effect of the thickness of the salt layer on the deformation. In the absence of a salt layer (Model 2; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a), no mechanical decoupling occurs between the sedimentary cover and the basement. The extension phase is dominated by the pre-existing faults and their geometry, and the majority of the deformation accumulates along the pre-existing normal faults. After convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, long-wavelength and basement-cored anticlines develop in the sedimentary cover. The anticlines form asymmetrically and with a low internal deformation of the sedimentary sequence (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b and S2). The folding style within the sedimentary cover is determined by the pre-existing faults, resulting in the development of thrust faults that propagate upward through the overlying rocks. Basement faults cut the sedimentary cover and reach the surface without any significant deviation from their initial orientation. Furthermore, backthrusts form in the hanging wall as conjugates to the reactivated inherited faults. Strain-rate patterns reveal that the entire crustal package deforms uniformly, without mechanical decoupling along the different lithological layers.</p>
      <p id="d2e4278">Increasing the salt layer thickness to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Model 3) does not significantly affect the structural development during the extension phase compared to the reference model (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). However, a thicker salt layer hinders the extensional faults from fully cross-cutting the salt after a full extension (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c and S3). During shortening, a thicker salt layer acts as a more efficient décollement, impeding small-scale deformation in the sedimentary cover relative to the reference model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d; compare to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f). The sedimentary cover develops décollement folds cored by a thickened salt. The cover is pushed over the frontal basement fault on the left, which, upon reactivation, results in a salt-cored fault-propagation fold at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 210 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the increased amount of salt allows for vertical breakthroughs and diapir formation.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4324">Vertically averaged strain rate over model width for models with variable salt rheology after a shortening for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Effect of salt rheology</title>
      <p id="d2e4349">To investigate the impact of the rheology of the salt on the style of deformation, we considered two models with linear viscosity for the salt layer and compared the results with that of the reference model. For Models 4 and 5, we chose linear viscosities of 10<sup>18</sup> and 10<sup>20</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which are roughly equal to the lowest and largest viscosities observed in the reference model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c and f). After an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the low-viscosity Model 4 leads to the formation of symmetric ridges along the half-grabens and footwalls (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a and S4). The majority of the deformation is accommodated by the salt layer and the inherited faults. After compression for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the pattern of folds within the sedimentary cover diverges from that of the reference model, as it displays an inclination towards the hinterland (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b and S4). Based on the strain rates, deformation is accommodated across the décollements.</p>
      <p id="d2e4404">In Model 5, with higher salt viscosity, the structural pattern after an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resembles that of the reference model (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c). Strain rates reveal significant deformation occurring within the basement, localizing along the pre-existing weak zones. After shortening for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the style of folding shows significant differences from Model 4 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b, d and S5 in the Supplement). Several forethrusts develop above the imbricated basement blocks and backthrusts are generally absent. Strain rates indicate that the décollement remains laterally connected across the different basement blocks, whereas it is interrupted in the model with low linear viscosity (compare Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b and d).</p>
      <p id="d2e4432">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> presents the vertically averaged strain rate within the salt layer across models with different décollement rheology. The influence of a power law rheology on strain rate is characterized by a non-linear, accelerating response to stress. As stress levels increase, the strain rate increases more rapidly compared to a linear rheology, where the strain rate maintains a constant, linear relationship with stress. The mean strain rate in a salt layer with a power law rheology exceeds that in a salt layer with linear rheology, as illustrated.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4440">Composition inferred from Lagrangian markers and the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor, affected by different type of inherited faults after an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a, b)</bold> In the presence of planar inherited faults. <bold>(c, d)</bold> in the absence of any inherited faults.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Effect of basement fault geometry</title>
      <p id="d2e4479">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows two models, namely one with planar basement faults (Model 6) and one without prescribed basement faults (Model 7). After an extension for 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the basement faults maintain a constant dip angle, resulting in the formation of conjugate normal faults rooting in the lower extent of the pre-existing faults (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a and S6). Similar to the case with listric faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c), the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor indicates high concentration of deformation through the development of fractures within the sedimentary layers above the salt horizon, specifically at the back of the footwall of the faults (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a and S6). After compression for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, multiple overturned forward- and backward-verging folds develop within the sedimentary cover at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b and S6). These folds originate in relation to the activation of thrusts in the underlying basement. Notably, the planar faults play a pivotal role in the formation of backthrust faults. The principal strain rate is concentrated within vulnerable zones such as the salt layer, planar faults, and the newly formed backthrust faults within the basement (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b and S6). Basement faults cross-cut the salt décollement to form bypass thrusts.</p>
      <p id="d2e4533">In the absence of inherited faults (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c and S7), no zone of significant strain accumulation is formed during the extension phase. The maximum strain rate accumulates primarily along the fractures caused by the extension, while the basement is decoupled from the overlying sedimentary strata. After a shortening for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the basement has undergone an intense deformation by thrusting (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d and S7). Near the backstop wall (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), it is deformed into pop-up structures caused by conjugate thrusts, while forward-verging thrusts dominate towards the foreland. The overlaying sedimentary sequence is mainly shortened by décollement folding/faulting between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A large pop-up structure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) without mechanical decoupling between the basement and the sedimentary cover develops in front of the salt pinch-out (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d and S7). The strain rates indicate that at the late stage of shortening, a thin-skinned style of deformation is taking place in front of the salt pinch-out and the associated basement thrust.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4620">Composition inferred from Lagrangian markers and the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor, affected by different values of basement velocity after a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75, and <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Effect of basement shortening rate</title>
      <p id="d2e4751">The effect of basement involvement during convergence is implemented by varying the horizontal velocity of basement rocks exiting the right-side boundary, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). All of the previous models exhibit a rigid backstop over the entire right side that prevented the basement material from leaving the model domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0), resulting in 100 % involvement of the basement in the deformation. In this section, we show a set of models in which the basement is allowed to exit the model domain with a velocity that is a varying fraction of that on the left boundary (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). The basement will experience a slower rate of shortening with respect to the cover. As a result, the degree of thin-skinned deformation will increase.</p>
      <p id="d2e4797">With a basement involvement of 75 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the two faults located on the right side of the model transform into flat–ramp–flat structures (Model 8; Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a and S8). Above the basement blocks, the sedimentary cover undergoes thrusting, and the cover sequence overthrusts the frontal fault zone by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If the basement shortening rate is 50 % of the cover shortening rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the faults situated on the right side of the model remain continuous and undergo significant displacement (Model 9; Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b and S9). After a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fault on the right side partly exits the model domain. Additionally, strain rate indicates that most deformation localizes within the salt layer, the pre-existing basement faults, and faults within the sedimentary cover. With a basement involvement of 25 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the fault on the right side almost entirely left the model domain, and the other two faults experience lesser degrees of involvement, roughly displaying 100 % of tectonic inversion (Model 10; Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c and S10). In comparison to the previous cases, deformation in the sedimentary cover is more distributed laterally and does not depend as strongly on the location of basement faults. Furthermore, the salt layer remains connected and forms a nearly horizontal décollement horizon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c). In the case where the basement exits the model domain with the same velocity as the bottom boundary (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), inherited basement faults are not reactivated, and the sedimentary cover deforms in a thin-skinned tectonic style (Model 11; Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d and S11). The second invariant of the strain-rate tensor demonstrates that the salt horizon acts as a décollement layer with basement steps that developed during the rifting phase. The resulting thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belt exhibits a flat surface taper, given the weak salt rheology (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e5006">The models presented in the previous sections demonstrate the impact of weak zones, in the form of décollement layers and pre-existing basement faults, and the degree of involvement of the basement on the structural evolution and reactivation of inherited structures during tectonic inversion. In the following, we will provide insight into the effects of the implemented variables on the dynamic strength of the basement and strain localization within it. Furthermore, numerical results are compared to previous modeling attempts and natural examples from the ZFTB.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Strength and localization of deformation within the basement</title>
      <p id="d2e5016">The mechanical strength of fold-and-thrust belts and the partitioning of strain during their growth has been a topic of interest for many decades (Chapple, 1978; Davis et al., 1983; Stockmal et al., 2007; Tavani et al., 2015). During continental collision and the emergence of mountain belts, plate convergence rates usually decrease stepwise, given the increasing strength of the affected plate boundary (Wortel et al., 2009). Weak zones within the deformed rock layers play a crucial role in shaping the structural evolution of fold-and-thrust belts. In the case of the Zagros, numerical experiments demonstrate that the sub-horizontal salt horizon and inherited weak basement faults significantly influence the partitioning of strain. Regardless of whether the viscous décollement can fully decouple the upper and lower crust mechanically, the basement exerts a strong influence on the overall structural evolution of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt. This must be considered when constructing structural cross sections.</p>
      <p id="d2e5019">All experiments with prescribed weak zones within the basement show intense inversion along these inherited structures (e.g., Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). A particular experiment is Model 7, where no basement faults were prescribed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c and d). The structural style observed in Model 7 is driven by the low rheological strength of the salt layer, which decouples basement shortening from the overlying layers, resulting in thin-skinned deformation of the cover sequence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d). This weak salt layer promotes the formation of fault-propagation folds and conjugate thrusts (pop-ups), rather than a clear structural vergence, as observed by a large pop-up structure at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 230 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The topography of the top of basement is likely caused by a critical wedge geometry defined by the viscous strength of the lowermost modeled crust.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e5053"><bold>(a)</bold> Strain tensor superimposed on a differential stress tensor. <bold>(b–d)</bold> Differential stress profiles of front of the deformation front, with the décollement and basement fault and without the basement fault involved, respectively. <bold>(e)</bold> The integrated stress profile for reference model.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5071">In fold-and-thrust belts with local weak zones in the form of décollement layers and reactivated inherited faults, strength may vary across-strike. For example, the reference model (Model 1) displays a stress distribution with maximum values in the brittle part of the basement, which is cross-cut by hinterland-dipping faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a). To illustrate across-strike variations in strength, three vertical stress profiles are shown representing different segments of the evolving fold-and-thrust belt. (i) At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, basement faults and a salt décollement are absent, and the strength profile exhibits a simple form with a brittle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ductile (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) part (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b). (ii) The second profile at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross-cuts both salt  décollement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a basement fault (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that strongly affect the strength profile (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c). While the salt horizon shows very low stresses of only a few megapascals, stresses across the basement fault are reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in contrast to maximum stresses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around the brittle–ductile transition. (iii) Close to the backstop at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 460 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, maximal stresses increase to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d). At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the salt décollement displays an effective decoupling horizon, and an additional weak zone at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by flat ramp of a basement sliver stack. To infer the force acting across the fold-and-thrust belt related to the reference model, the differential stress profiles at each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinate are integrated over the vertical distance. For the reference model after a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, values range between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the lowest values coincide with the occurrence of basement faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c). In general, there is no clear trend observable that would refer to a weakening or strengthening related to deformation, as crustal thickening (strengthening) goes hand in hand with basement thrusting (weakening).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e5397">Horizontally averaged boundary force over time. <bold>(a)</bold> Models with variable salt thickness and salt rheology. <bold>(b)</bold> Models with variable fault geometry. <bold>(c)</bold> Models with a variable basement shortening rate. Model characteristics are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5417">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> shows the temporal evolution of the average force (e.g., the average value of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>e for the reference model) for a variety of models to identify key parameters that affect the stress state of continental collision zones. All models show similar boundary forces during the extension phase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>), except for Model 7 without pre-existing basement faults, which exhibits values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b). Similar force values during the extension for models with planar and listric inherited basement faults indicate that none of the tested fault geometries would preferably localize. During the convergence phase, boundary forces quickly increase, and most of the models show a general increasing trend from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time span (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>). A minor increase and decrease in force are observed related to the absence (Model 2) and increased thickness of the salt horizon (Model 3), respectively, while the strength (viscosity) of the salt has no detectable effect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a). The absence and geometry of basement faults display a significant importance during convergence, in contrast to the extension phase, where planar preexisting faults increase the necessary boundary force by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and no faults lead to another increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the first 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of convergence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b). More important is the effect of basement involvement in crustal shortening, with decreasing involvement resulting in decreasing boundary force (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>c). This illustrates the importance of an effective décollement level that is able to decouple an upper crust with distributed deformation from a basement that is underthrust towards the suture, where it deforms more intensely (Tavani et al., 2015; Pfiffner et al., 2002). A similar pattern of boundary force evolution was also observed from analogue models, however, with more acute variations for specific internal deformation of the compressed sand pile (McBeck et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Comparison with numerical modeling studies</title>
      <p id="d2e5607">The mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts has been investigated by means of numerical methods since the 1980s (e.g., Borja and Dreiss, 1989). Rapidly evolving computing capabilities led to a vast increase in geodynamic numerical modeling studies that provide an invaluable contribution towards our understanding of geotectonic systems (e.g., van Zelst et al., 2022; Gerya, 2022; Ismail-Zadeh and Tackley, 2010). Previous numerical models of fold-and-thrust belts have typically focused on thin-skinned tectonic systems, investigating parameters such as wedge and décollement strength, rheology, surface processes, and mechanical stratigraphy (e.g., Stockmal et al., 2007; Buiter et al., 2016; Simpson, 2011; Burbidge and Braun, 2002; Ruh et al., 2012). However, the inclusion of rifting prior to collision adds a new dimension that has often been overlooked in these studies. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of tectonic evolution by examining how pre-collisional structural configurations influence later deformation patterns. Including rifting before convergence is crucial, as it sets the initial conditions that significantly impact structural evolution during collision (Buiter and Pfiffner, 2003; Ruh and Vergés, 2018; Granado and Ruh, 2019). This approach offers several advantages. It provides insight into structural inheritance, as rifting creates pre-existing weaknesses and fault systems that play a crucial role during subsequent compressional phases. Our model demonstrates how these inherited structures influence strain localization and deformation styles, providing insights into the evolution of complex geological features such as the Fars Arc. In the following, we discuss several numerical studies concerning tectonic systems that are similar to the one presented in this study to set our results into perspective and to identify generally applicable observations. We, furthermore, comment on the importance of implementing an extensional phase into the model setup.</p>
      <p id="d2e5610">Buiter and Pfiffner (2003) applied a two-dimensional, viscoplastic numerical model in order to evaluate the dynamics of tectonic inversion of a series of half-graben basins upon compression. They reported syn- and post-rift sediment uplift, accompanied by basement block rotation, and the emergence of newly formed shear zones in the post-rift sequence, originating from basin-bounding faults. Weak sediments at the basin base contribute to the generation of basement shortcut faults. Furthermore, their study illustrates the predominant development of back thrusts as conjugates to listric basin-bounding faults. The structural evolution observed in our models aligns with their research findings, demonstrating a similar pattern of strain localization within syn-rift and post-rift layers, mainly initiated by  deformation along pre-existing underlying faults. Additionally, compared to their findings, our results indicate that the formation of back thrusts is mainly associated with the inversion of planar faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>; Model 6).</p>
      <p id="d2e5615">Nilforoushan et al. (2013) presented two-dimensional thermomechanical experiments of thick-skinned fold-and-thrust belts with salt décollements. They demonstrated that the geothermal gradient and the mineralogy of the basement (ductile flow law) strongly affect the geometry and reactivation of inherited basement faults. Furthermore, they underlined the importance of a weak salt horizon at the base of the sedimentary succession for the mechanical decoupling and formation of a thin-skinned upper-crustal fold-and-thrust belt, resulting in the variability in the rate of shortening between the cover and the basement. Their findings corroborate the hypothesis of Molinaro et al. (2005) that in the ZSFB, greater shortening occurs within the cover compared to the basement. From our results examining the effects of the shortening rate of the basement on structural development, we observed the emergence of long-wavelength folds arising directly from the movements of faults within the basement (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a–d). These findings align with natural occurrences and are corroborated by geological cross-sectional data, reinforcing the principal characteristics of the Fars Arc that are typified by folds of extensive wavelengths. This agrees with the suggestions by Mouthereau et al. (2006), who proposed that the early activation of basement deformation dictates the formation of the large-wavelength folds. Furthermore, Mouthereau et al. (2006) determined that the viscosity of Hormuz salt decreases significantly with increasing temperature, exhibiting Newtonian fluid behavior under low-stress and low-strain-rate conditions. In our results, the average viscosity of non-Newtonian salt is affected by both temperature and strain rate, where weak zones with the lowest strain rates and temperatures exhibit the largest viscosity values. The resulting values are larger than what was proposed for the Fars Arc resulting from critical wedge modeling (Mouthereau et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d2e5620">Ghazian and Buiter (2014) investigated the impact of salt for the southeast ZFTB by 2D thermomechanical models. Their findings revealed that the presence of a thick basal Hormuz salt effectively decouples overlying sediments from the basement and promotes the localization of deformation in the sediments. Our results align with these findings, demonstrating a significant influence of the salt layer on controlling topographic height and folding patterns (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The deformation style in the basement and the cover sequence decouples along the weak salt horizon. As the salt thickness increases, this layer functions more effectively as a décollement, impeding deformation in the sedimentary cover sequence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5630">Bauville and Schmalholz (2015, 2017) and Kiss et al. (2020) conducted 2D numerical experiments to investigate the transition from basement-involved thin-skinned to thick-skinned tectonics and the effects of tectonic inheritance on the development of nappe systems. The key parameters controlling this transition were found to be the viscosity ratios within the basement and between the basement and the sedimentary cover above it. Specifically, a higher ratio within the basement favors a thick-skinned deformation, while a higher ratio between the basement and cover leads to a thin-skinned deformation. As indicated by our study, 100 % participation of the basement in the deformation leads to thick-skinned deformation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), while non-participation of the basement leads to thin-skinned deformation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>; Model 11). Their findings show that the tectonic and structural inheritance play a significant role in controlling the tectonic evolution and resulting structures in the fold-and-thrust belts. The geometry and magnitude of mechanical heterogeneities, like the varying basement–cover interface characterized by half-grabens and horsts, as well as the vertical alternation of sedimentary layers with different mechanical strengths, influence nappe formation. Their observations align with our findings that the presence of pre-rift salt and inherited faults, which serve as structural inheritances, influence the shape and geometry of the basin (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Moreover, their simulations and ours revealed that linear and power law viscous rheologies demonstrated similar features to those of more complex simulations, indicating the robustness of these findings (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>; Model 4 and 5).</p>
      <p id="d2e5646">Eslamrezaei et al. (2023) used numerical discrete element models to investigate the impact of mechanical stratigraphy, décollement layers, and the number and thickness of cover sequences on the structural evolution and strain partitioning of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts. Their modeling outcomes revealed that weak décollements played a crucial role in decoupled deformation within the fold-and-thrust belt under continuous shortening. The study underscored that shortening was primarily accommodated by thrust-related folds, resulting in notable variations in structural styles. In alignment with our findings (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>), the weak décollement layer, due to its characteristics, exhibited an inability to retain stress and undergo deformation, as evidenced by the increasing strain rate along the basal detachment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Their study's conclusions and our results emphasized that the structural style and decoupling in thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts and the formation of structures, such as box folds and harpoon structures, are influenced by factors such as rheology, the number, and thickness of décollements (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5662">An essential characteristic of the numerical experiments presented here is the implementation of a rifting phase prevailing crustal shortening. Earlier numerical studies on tectonic inversion demonstrated that strain-related weakening of the crustal basement during an extensional tectonic phase has an important effect on the localization of deformation during consequent convergence (Ruh and Vergés, 2018). Furthermore, the mechanical strength of sedimentary deposits filling rift-related basins has been shown to influence the structural evolution during tectonic inversion, where weak syn-rift deposits favor the development of hanging wall bypass structures (Granado and Ruh, 2019). In contrast, various studies mimic the extensional phase by prescribing inherited structures and geometric configurations comparable to rifted margins instead of conducting an extensional phase when investigating the tectonic inversion of fold-and-thrust belts (e.g., Buiter and Pfiffner, 2003; Nilforoushan et al., 2013; Bauville and Schmalholz, 2015; Kiss et al., 2020). However, the implementation of an extension phase allows for a dynamic formation of basement steps and graben geometry, based on the thermomechanical model characteristics such as the visco–plastic/brittle transition and the evolution of the salt decoupling along the basement top (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a–c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, b). Model 7 demonstrates that a certain type of strain localization is needed to form narrow shear bands similar to basement faults during extension (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c). While other studies impose specific boundary conditions (Ruh and Vergés, 2018) or thermal variations (Ruh and Vergés, 2018), we introduced predefined geometries to localize extensional normal faults, controlling the position of basement deformation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Comparison with the structural evolution of the Fars Arc</title>
      <p id="d2e5681">The tectonic style of the Fars Arc is characterized by a combination of thin-skinned salt-related folding and thick-skinned basement thrusting (i.e., Mouthereau et al., 2007a). The structure of the sedimentary cover is shaped by a series of detachment faults and fault-propagation folds involving several salt diapirs rooted in the Hormuz salt (e.g., Jahani et al., 2007; Motamedi and Gharabeigli, 2019; Vergés et al., 2024). In addition, at least three high-angle reverse basement faults (High Zagros, Surmeh, and Mountain Front faults) are constrained based on their seismicity, structural relief, magnetic anomalies, and abrupt topographic changes (e.g., Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Teknik and Ghods, 2017; Karasözen et al., 2019). The dynamic importance of these faults is supported by our results, as numerical models without basement faults (Model 7 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) display a marked difference in the structural style compared to geological observations in the Fars Arc. In the absence of basement faults in the models, deformation is concentrated only in the outer part of the arc in the form of an imbricate thrust system and a large mushroom anticline near the salt pinch-out. Furthermore, the importance of the Hormuz salt for the distinct structural style of the Fars Arc is corroborated by the numerical model without a basal salt layer (Model 2 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b). In that model, there are four basement-involved anticlines form across the entire belt, each with wavelengths of about 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while in contrast, in the Fars Arc, the anticlines can be grouped into short-wavelength detachment anticlines and long-wavelength basement-involved anticlines (e.g., Mouthereau et al., 2006). In the model without salt, all structures verge towards the front without any back-thrusting. This type of fold and fault geometry is not representative of the observed structures in the Fars Arc (e.g., Motamedi et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014; Jahani et al., 2017). Observational evidence thus highlights the essential roles that the basement and the salt layer play in determining the deformation style of the belt.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e5698"><bold>(a)</bold> The result of numerical modeling with thick salt and basement involved (Model 3). <bold>(b)</bold> Geological cross section of the Dowlatabad syncline and Kangan anticline (modified from Najafi et al., 2021). <bold>(c)</bold> Aerial image of Asaluyeh and Kangan anticlines. <bold>(d)</bold> Satellite image of the Hajiabad diapir (©Google Earth). <bold>(e)</bold> Satellite image of the Kharman diapir (©Google Earth).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f13.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5721">The results of the experiment with a 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick basal salt layer (Model 3; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c and d) demonstrate that a thicker salt layer interacts with the basement faults to form symmetrical anticlines containing salt cores and discordant diapirs. The topography of the Fars Arc cannot be solely attributed to the presence of a salt layer; the basement's role in structural development is also significant. As our results indicate, processes involving the basement should be considered an essential factor in reconstructing and assessing the geological development of the region. The models demonstrate that the basement faults ramp up through the upper part of the basement and eventually flatten along the Hormuz salt level at a depth of around 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Model 1 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f). Similar structures of basement faults detaching along evaporitic levels in the middle of the sedimentary cover, or reaching the surface to cut the forelimbs of their hanging wall anticlines, are documented in the Fars Arc (Vergeìs et al., 2024), such as the Kangan, Asaluyeh, and Tabnak anticlines, located to the south of the cross section in the foreland vicinity and within the Mountain Front Fault (Berberian, 1995; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>b and c). These anticlines are characterized by a pronounced concentric surface geometry (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a).</p>
      <p id="d2e5750">A well-studied example of syn-tectonic growth strata is the Dowlatabad syncline, located approximately 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> northeast of the Persian Gulf coastline (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a and b) and limited by the Sefid anticline to the north and the NW segment of the Pazan anticline to the south (Najafi et al., 2021). The Dowlatabad syncline is infilled by more than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of syn-folding sediments. Numerical results from Model 3, which has a thick salt layer, compare well with the formation of the Dowlatabad syncline (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a and b). (i) The forelimbs of the Pazan and Sefid anticlines were faulted by foreland-directed thrusts rising from the basal décollement; (ii) surface processes resulted in a smooth topography; and (iii) the surface has an asymmetric shape, while, at depth, the structure has the form of a box fold.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d2e5775"><bold>(a)</bold> Seismicity of Zagros fold-and-thrust belt reported by ISC during the years 2000 to 2023, with magnitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4, and local temporary network data by Tatar et al. (2004), with magnitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4, superimposed on a shaded relief map derived from global topography. <bold>(b–d)</bold> Projection of earthquakes along profiles A–B after removing fixed depths on the geological cross section and the reference model (Model 1) after a convergence for 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/15/1479/2024/se-15-1479-2024-f14.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5834">In the Zagros belt, there is a noted relationship between faulting patterns and the distribution of salt diapirs (Talbot and Alavi, 1996; Hessami et al., 2001; Bahroudi and Koyi, 2003; Sherkati and Letouzey, 2004; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Jahani et al., 2017). Our numerical results indicate that salt diapirism may be triggered at two distinct stages in the case of a thick (4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) salt décollement. During the rifting phase, small-scale diapirs start to grow above the tip of normal faults, partially piercing the sedimentary cover (Model 3; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). This procedure can be considered a short-lasting and locally developed reactive diapirism stage (e.g., Jackson and Vendeville, 1994; Jackson and Hudec, 2017). More significantly, the growth of two salt diapirs is observed during the compression phase in the inner zone of the fold-and-thrust belt (Model 3 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d). In contrast to décollement folds, these salt bodies have pierced the overburden strata and show discordant contact with overlying sediments. The process involves the buoyant rise in underground salt when subjected to pressure from convergent tectonic forces. These early-growing diapirs, squeezed by further shortening, lead to the development of secondary salt welds. This type of shortened diapir has recently been documented in the High Zagros zone in a field-based study by Taghikhani et al. (2024) and has been already known in the SE Fars Arc (e.g., Callot et al., 2007; Jahani et al., 2007) and the Persian Gulf (e.g., Hassanpour et al., 2021, 2021; Snidero et al., 2020) through seismic interpretations. A well-exposed example of such a structure is the Hajiabad diapir, located in the inner part of the Fars Arc, where an 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long squeezed Hormuz salt diapir trends NW and dips towards NE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>d). The salt-bearing evaporites have been shortened between the two flanks of the precursor salt wall, forming a secondary salt weld. Another well-exposed example in the inner Fars is the Kharman diapir (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>e), which is in good correlation with observations from Model 3. With numerical modeling, Fernandez and Kaus (2014) showed that pre-existing salt diapirs can significantly influence the pattern and growth of three-dimensional folds and fold patterns, accelerating fold formation and localizing deformation and highlighting the important role of diapirism in structural evolution during tectonic processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Implication for seismic activity in the Fars Arc</title>
      <p id="d2e5871">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a displays a seismicity map of the Zagros in the region of our profile. It shows events with magnitudes greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4, between 2000 and 2023 from the International Seismological Centre (ISC) global database (<uri>http://www.ics.ac.uk</uri>, last access: 1 January 2023). We have excluded those events of the database with pre-fixed depths (usually set at 10 or 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the plot. Furthermore, a catalogue of small-magnitude earthquakes from Tatar et al. (2004) recorded by a local temporary network over a period of 7 weeks is plotted. A local network with close station spacing allows for more precise location of earthquakes, and Tatar et al. (2004) state that these events have horizontal and vertical uncertainties below 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The earthquakes are also plotted onto the geological cross section of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c and the compositional image of the final stage (15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Myr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Model 1 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>b and c). Several studies have asserted that the depths and focal mechanism solutions indicate that high-angle reverse faults in the basement are responsible for major earthquakes in the SE Zagros (e.g., Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004). Others have argued that most of the strongest earthquakes in the ZSFB probably lie in the lower sedimentary cover, but their aftershock activity mostly occurs deeper in the basement (e.g., Nissen et al., 2011, 2014). A more recent work by Karasözen et al. (2019) used a calibrated earthquake relocation to show that the Zagros earthquakes nucleate in both the cover and the basement. According to our numerical results, the activation of basement structures localizes topographic features and affects thrust faults within the overlying sedimentary cover (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). Notable examples of active basement faults in the Fars Arc include the Surmeh Fault and the Mountain Front Fault, which have distinct structural and topographic characteristics (Jackson,1980; Jackson and McKenzie, 1984; Berberian, 1995; Mouthereau et al., 2007b). Critical wedge modeling confirms that  basement-involved shortening is the primary factor influencing deformation and topography in the Fars Arc (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b; Mouthereau et al., 2006). Balanced cross sections provide additional evidence of the basement's involvement in shortening through major thrusts rooted in a deep décollement level within the lower crust (Molinaro et al., 2005; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Najafi et al.; 2014; Najafi et al.; 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e5937">The majority of earthquakes are concentrated within the sedimentary cover, aligning with the décollement faults (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>b and c). This observation supports the theory of the sedimentary cover decoupling from the basement, influenced by the presence of the basal salt layer. The depth trend of earthquakes in the basement exhibits a notable correlation with the High Zagros Fault and the Surmeh Fault, which confirms the existence of pre-existing weak zones within the basement at these locations. Furthermore, the depth distribution of the earthquakes supports the idea of a listric geometry for the basement faults. By examining the deformation within the basement and the earthquake depths, we estimate the transition zone from brittle to ductile behavior at around 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While this depth is influenced by multiple factors, including material parameters, temperature, and strain rate (stress), our approximation is based on typical conditions relevant to the region. This suggests that diabase rheology, combined with the applied geotherm, is appropriate for modeling the basement under these specific conditions. Mouthereau et al. (2006), on the other hand, concluded that diabase might be too weak to reproduce the observed topography in the Fars Arc. However, they apply a crustal thickness of 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which implies increased temperature conditions and thus a weaker diabase detachment.</p>
      <p id="d2e5958">Our modeling results indicate that reverse faults cutting both flanks of décollement anticlines are likely responsible for the shallower earthquakes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>c). This phenomenon was studied in the Shanul anticline, southeast of our study region, where earthquakes with reverse mechanisms occur on both flanks of the anticline at depths mostly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jamalreyhani et al., 2021). However, basement faults are the source of deeper and larger earthquakes across the Zagros fold belt, generally concentrated in NE-dipping linear trends (e.g., Nissen et al., 2019; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5980">Lacombe and Mouthereau (2002) discussed the relative chronology between mid-crustal décollement thrusting and shallow décollement folding of sedimentary cover in various orogenic belts, such as Taiwan, the Pyrenees, and the Alps. This relationship has been further investigated through analogue and numerical modeling in the Jura, Appalachians, Kopet Dagh, and Zagros fold-and-thrust belts (e.g., Pohn, 2000; Orjuela et al., 2021; Ruh and Vergés, 2018; as presented in this study). A comprehensive analysis of these studies, in alignment with our results, suggests that there is no definitive sequence for thin- and thick-skinned tectonics in all orogenic belts. This sequence appears to be controlled, at least in part, by the rheology and temperature of basement rocks, the thickness of evaporitic layers in the sedimentary cover, the dip and flatness of inherited basement faults, as well as their orientation in relation to the tectonic transport direction.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5992">Our series of 2D finite-difference thermomechanical numerical experiments provide insight into how the rheology of basal salt and the mechanical properties of inherited basement faults control the structural evolution and final style of fold-and-thrust belts. The models were designed based on the tectonic history (continental rifting and later collision) and mechanical stratigraphy of the Fars Arc in the Zagros orogenic belt. The comparison of numerical results with the actual structure of the Fars Arc has led to the following conclusions. <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5997">Pre-existing weak zones, such as basement faults and décollement anticlines, serve as primary sites for deformation accumulation,   particularly during extensional tectonic phases.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e6001">The basement faults form large-wavelength and foreland-verging fault-propagation anticlines in the overlying sedimentary cover, while the thick salt layer promotes the growth of second-order and smaller-wavelength décollement anticlines accompanied by both fore- and back-limb thrust faults.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e6005">Reactivated faults play a crucial role in stress transfer, leading to the formation of new faults and seismic activity at their tips that   propagate into the sedimentary cover. Listric faults are more effective at accommodating strain rates.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e6009">The presence of a basal salt layer influences fault displacement, contributing to the development of back thrusts within the sedimentary cover.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e6013">The distribution of earthquakes is significantly influenced by the presence of weak zones, with shallow earthquakes predominantly occurring along décollement levels and larger and deeper earthquakes associated with basement faults. These findings highlight the importance of considering geological and structural complexities when assessing seismicity and tectonic events in tectonically active regions like the Fars Arc.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e6017">The degree of basement involvement directly influences the model's resistance, with greater involvement facilitating deformation process over geologic time. In addition, variations in the resistance to the deformation based on salt rheology and fault geometry were observed, with listric faults minimizing resistance and therefore facilitating deformation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e6021">Intense basement deformation observed in the numerical experiments indicates the importance of the lower crust for the construction of regional cross sections of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6028">The GIF videos of all experiments presented in this study are available in Figshare with the following identifier: <uri>https://figshare.com/s/cb0c7f5a9a6fda0e38ef</uri> (Gomar et al., 2024).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e6034">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1479-2024-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1479-2024-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6043">FG: modeling setup, experiment run, investigation, writing (original draft and handling), visualization, figure drafting. JR: hypothesis of work, numerical modeling code write-up, interpretation of results, validation, supervision, writing, and reviewing and editing. MN: hypothesis of work, interpretation of results, supervision, fieldwork and cross section construction, and reviewing and editing. FS: hypothesis of work, modeling setup, supervision, and reviewing and editing. All authors contributed to and approved the submitted article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6049">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6055">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6061">We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers,  Frédéric Mouthereau and Lorenzo Giuseppe Candioti, for their time and effort in reviewing our paper. Their insightful comments and suggestions have significantly improved the quality of the paper. Additionally, we extend our appreciation to Susanne Buiter for her comments and editorial guidance throughout the review process. This work is based on the doctoral dissertation of the corresponding author, Fatemeh Gomar, at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran. It was partly developed during her 6-month scientific stay in the Structural Geology and Tectonics group at ETH Zürich, Switzerland.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6066">The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6073">This paper was edited by Susanne Buiter and reviewed by Frédéric Mouthereau and Lorenzo Giuseppe Candioti.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., and Mouthereau, F.: Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): Constraints from collisional and earlier deformation, Int. J. Earth Sci., 94, 401–419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-005-0481-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00531-005-0481-4</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., Whitechurch, H., Vrielynck, B., Spakman, W., Monié, P., Meyer, B., and Wortel, R.: Zagros orogeny: A subduction-dominated process, Geol. Mag., 148, 692–725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100046X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S001675681100046X</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Alavi, M.: Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution, Am. J. Sci., 304, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.304.1.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.304.1.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Aldega, L., Bigi, S., Carminati, E., Trippetta, F., Corrado, S., and Kavoosi, M. A.: The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt in the Fars province (Iran): II. Thermal evolution, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 93, 376–390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.022</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bahroudi, A. and Koyi, H. A.: Effect of spatial distribution of Hormuz salt on deformation style in the Zagros fold and thrust belt: An analogue modelling approach, J. Geol. Soc., 160, 719–733, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/0016-764902-135</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Barber, D. E., Stockli, D. F., and Galster, F.: The Proto-Zagros foreland basin in Lorestan, western Iran: Insights from multimineral detrital geothermochronometric and trace elemental provenance analysis, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 2657–2680, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GC008185</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Barchi, M. R. and Tavarnelli, E.: Thin vs. thick-skinned tectonics in the Umbria-Marche fold-and-thrust belt: Contrast or coexistence?, in: From the Guajira Desert to the Apennines, and from Mediterranean Microplates to the Mexican Killer Asteroid: Honoring the Career of Walter Alvarez, edited by: Koeberl, C., Claeys, P., and Montanari, A., Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA, 557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2022.2557(05)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/2022.2557(05)</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bauville, A. and Schmalholz, S. M.: Transition from thin-to thick-skinned tectonics and consequences for nappe formation: Numerical simulations and applications to the Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland, Tectonophysics, 665, 101–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.030</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bauville, A. and Schmalholz, S. M.: Tectonic inheritance and kinematic strain localization as trigger for the formation of the Helvetic nappes, Switzerland, Swiss J. Geosci., 110, 523–534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-017-0260-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00015-017-0260-9</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Berberian, M.: Master “blind” thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics, Tectonophysics, 241, 193–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-C</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Berberian, M. and King, G. C. P.: Towards a Paleogeography and Tectonic Evolution of Iran, Can. J. Earth Sci., 18, 210–265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/e81-019</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bernaola, G., Sharp, I. R., Blanc, E., Saura, E., Hunt, D. W., Fernandez, N., Embry, J. C., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Casini, G., Casciello, E., Romaire, I., and Homke, S.: Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, J. Geol. Soc., 168, 235–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/0016-76492010-092</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Blanc, E. J. P., Allen, M. B., Inger, S., and Hassani, H.: Structural styles in the Zagros Simple Folded Zone, Iran, J. Geol. Soc., 160, 401–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/0016-764902-110</ext-link>,2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Bonini, M., Sani, F., and Antonielli, B.: Basin inversion and contractional reactivation of inherited normal faults: A review based on previous and new experimental models, Tectonophysics, 522–523, 55–88, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.014</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Borderie, S., Graveleau, F., Witt, C., and Vendeville, B. C.: Impact of an interbedded viscous décollement on the structural and kinematic coupling in fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from analogue modeling, Tectonophysics, 722, 118–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.019</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Borja, R. I. and Dreiss, S. J.: Numerical modeling of accretionary wedge mechanics: Application to the Barbados subduction problem, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9323–9339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB07p09323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB094iB07p09323</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Boyer, S. E. and Elliott, D.: Thrust systems, AAPG Bull.l, 66, 1196–1230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002tc001417</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Buiter, S. J. H. and Pfiffner, O. A.: Numerical models of the inversion of half-graben basins, Tectonics, 22, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002tc001417</ext-link>,2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Buiter, S. J., Schreurs, G., Albertz, M., Gerya, T. V., Kaus, B., Landry, W., Le Pourhiet, L., Mishin, Y., Egholm, D. L., Cooke, M., and Maillot, B.: Benchmarking numerical models of brittle thrust wedges, J. Struct. Geol., 92, 140–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Burbidge, D. R. and Braun, J.: Numerical models of the evolution of accretionary wedges and fold-and-thrust belts using the distinct-element method, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 542–561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Callot, J. P., Jahani, S., and Letouzey, J.: The Role of Pre-Existing Diapirs in Fold and Thrust Belt Development. Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: from fold kinematics to hydrocarbon systems, edited by:  Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., and Vergés, J., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 309–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_16</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Callot, J. P., Trocmé, V., Letouzey, J., Albouy, E., Jahani, S., and Sherkati, S.: Pre-existing salt structures and the folding of the Zagros Mountains, Geol. Soc. Sp., 363, 545–561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP363.27" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP363.27</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Crameri, F., Schmeling, H., Golabek, G. J., Duretz, T., Orendt, R., Buiter, S. J. H., May, D. A., Kaus, B. J. P., Gerya, T. V., and Tackley, P. J.: A comparison of numerical surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: an evaluation of the `sticky air'method, Geophys. J. Int., 189, 38–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Chapple, W. M.: Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 89, 1189–1198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89&lt;1189:MOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89&lt;1189:MOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Cooper, M.: Structural style and hydrocarbon prospectivity in fold and thrust belts: A global review, Geol. Soc. Sp., 272, 447–472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.272.01.23" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.272.01.23</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Dal Zilio, L., Ruh, J., and Avouac, J. P.: Structural evolution of orogenic wedges: interplay between erosion and weak décollements, Tectonics, 39, e2020TC006210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020TC006210</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Davis, D., Suppe, J., and Dahlen, F. A.: Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 1153–1172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB088iB02p01153</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Davis, D., Suppe, J., and Dahlen, F. A.: Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 88, 1153–1172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB088iB02p01153</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Eslamirezaei, N., Alavi, S. A., Nabavi, S. T., and Ghassemi, M. R.: Influence of multiple décollement and cover rock rheology on the structural evolution of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: insights from discrete element modelling, C. R. Geosci., 355, 215–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5802/crgeos.224</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Etemad-Saeed, N., Najafi, M., and Vergés, J.: Provenance evolution of Oligocene–Pliocene foreland deposits in the Dezful embayment to constrain Central Zagros exhumation history, J. Geol. Soc., 177, 799–817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2019-206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/jgs2019-206</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Falcon, N. L.: Southern Iran: Zagros Mountains, Geol. Soc. Sp., 4, 199–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.004.01.11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.004.01.11</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Gerya, T.: Introduction to numerical geodynamic modelling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 358 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781316534243</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gerya, T.: Numerical modeling of subduction: State of the art and future directions, Geosphere, 18, 503–561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02416.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/ges02416.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gerya, T. V., Yuen, D. A.: Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco–elasto–plastic thermo–mechanical problems, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 163, 83–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Fernandez, N. and Kaus, B. J.: Influence of pre-existing salt diapirs on 3D folding patterns, Tectonophysics, 637, 354–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.021</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Ghazian, R. K. and Buiter, S. J. H.: Numerical modelling of the role of salt in continental collision: An application to the southeast Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Tectonophysics, 632, 96–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.006</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Gomar, F., Ruh, J. B., Najafi, M., and Sobouti, F.: GIF videos of numerical modeling experiments, Figshare, <uri>https://figshare.com/s/cb0c7f5a9a6fda0e38ef</uri>, last access: 3 Dezember 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Goes, S., Hasterok, D., Schutt, D. L., and Klöcking, M.: Continental lithospheric temperatures: A review, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 306, 106509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106509</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Granado, P. and Ruh, J. B.: Numerical modelling of inversion tectonics in fold-and-thrust belts, Tectonophysics, 763, 14–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.033</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Hasterok, D. and Chapman, D. S.: Heat production and geotherms for the continental lithosphere, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 59–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.034</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Hassanpour, J., Yassaghi, A., Muñoz, J. A., and Jahani, S.: Salt tectonics in a double salt-source layer setting (Eastern Persian Gulf, Iran): Insights from interpretation of seismic profiles and sequential cross-section restoration, Basin Res., 33, 159–185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/bre.12459</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hessami, K., Koyi, H. A., Talbot, C. J., Tabasi, H., and Shabanian, E.: Progressive unconformities within an evolving foreland fold-thrust belt, Zagros Mountains, J. Geol. Soc., 158, 969–982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/0016-764901-007</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Heydarzadeh, K., Ruh, J. B., Vergés, J., Hajialibeigi, H., and Gharabeigli, G.: Evolution of a structural basin: numerical modelling applied to the Dehdasht Basin, Central Zagros, Iran, J. Asian Earth Sci., 187, 104088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104088</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Homke, S., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Sharp, I., Garcés, M., Montero-Verdú, I., Karpuz, R., and Goodarzi, M. H.: Late Cretaceous–Paleocene formation of the proto–Zagros foreland basin, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 121, 963–978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/B26035.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/B26035.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Humair, F., Bauville, A., Epard, J. L., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Interaction of folding and thrusting during fold-and-thrust-belt evolution: Insights from numerical simulations and application to the Swiss Jura and the Canadian Foothills., Tectonophysics, 789, 228474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228474" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228474</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> Ismail-Zadeh, A. and Tackley, P.: Computational methods for geodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 301 pp, ISBN 9781139489355, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, J. and Fitch, T.: Basement faulting and the focal depths of the larger earthquakes in the Zagros mountains (Iran), Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 64, 561–586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02685.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02685.x</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, J. and McKenzie, D.: Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan, Geophys. J. Int., 77, 185–264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01931.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01931.x</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, J. A.: Reactivation of basement faults and crustal shortening in orogenic belts, Nature, 283, 343–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/283343a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/283343a0</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Jackson, M. P. A. and Hudec, M. R.: Salt Tectonics: Principles and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 498 pp., ISBN 1107013313, 9781107013315, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, M. P. A. and Vendeville, B. C.: Regional extension as a geologic trigger for diapirism, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 106, 57–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106&lt;0057:REAAGT&gt;2.3.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106&lt;0057:REAAGT&gt;2.3.CO;2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., Letouzey, J., and De Lamotte, D. F.: The eastern termination of the Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt, Iran: Structures, evolution, and relationships between salt plugs, folding, and faulting, Tectonics, 28, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008TC002418</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., de Lamotte, D. F., Letouzey, J., and Leturmy, P.: The Salt Diapirs of the Eastern Fars Province (Zagros, Iran): A Brief Outline of Their Past and Present, in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., and Vergés, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 289–308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_15</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Jahani, S., Hassanpour, J., Mohammadi-Firouz, S., Letouzey, J., de Lamotte, D. F., Alavi, S. A., and Soleimany, B.: Salt tectonics and tear faulting in the central part of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran, Mar. Pet. Geol., 86, 426–446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.003</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Jamalreyhani, M., Pousse-Beltran, L., Büyükakpınar, P., Cesca, S., Nissen, E., Ghods, A., López-Comino, J.Á., Rezapour, M., and Najafi, M.: The 2019–2020 Khalili (Iran) Earthquake Sequence—Anthropogenic Seismicity in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, 2021JB022797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JB022797</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Jiménez-Munt, I., Fernández, M., Saura, E., Vergés, J., and García-Castellanos, D.: 3-D lithospheric structure and regional/residual Bouguer anomalies in the Arabia–Eurasia collision (Iran), Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1311–1324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05580.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05580.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Karasözen, E., Nissen, E., Bergman, E. A., and Ghods, A.: Seismotectonics of the Zagros (Iran) From Orogen-Wide, Calibrated Earthquake Relocations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 9109–9129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JB017336</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Kendall, J., Vergés, J., Koshnaw, R., and Louterbach, M.: Petroleum tectonic comparison of fold and thrust belts: the Zagros of Iraq and Iran, the Pyrenees of Spain, the Sevier of Western USA and the Beni Sub-Andean of Bolivia, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 490, 79–103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP490-2018-102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP490-2018-102</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Kent, P. E.: Recent Studies of South Persian Salt Plugs, AAPG Bull., 42, 2951–2972, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Kent, P. E.: Recent Studies of South Persian Salt Plugs, AAPG Bull., 42, 2951–2972, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Khadivi, S., Mouthereau, F., Larrasoaña, J. C., Vergés, J., Lacombe, O., Khademi, E., Beamud, E., Melinte-Dobrinescu, M., and Suc, J. P.: Magnetochronology of synorogenic Miocene foreland sediments in the Fars arc of the Zagros Folded Belt (SW Iran), Basin Res., 22, 918–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00446.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00446.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Kiss, D., Duretz, T., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Tectonic inheritance controls nappe detachment, transport and stacking in the Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland: insights from thermomechanical simulations, Solid Earth, 11, 287–305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-287-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-11-287-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Koshnaw, R. I., Stockli, D. F., and Schlunegger, F.: Timing of the Arabia-Eurasia continental collision—Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of the Red Bed Series strata of the northwest Zagros hinterland, Kurdistan region of Iraq, Geology, 47, 47–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G45499.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G45499.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Koyi, H. A. and Mansurbeg, H.: The Role of Multiple Weak Lithologies in the Deformation of Cover Units in the Northwestern Segment of the Zagros FOLD-AND-THRUST Belt, J. Petrol. Geol., 44, 145–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/jpg.12783</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Lacombe, O. and Mouthereau, F.: Basement-involved shortening and deep décollement tectonics in forelands of orogens: Insights from recent collision belts (Taiwan, Western Alps, Pyrenees), Tectonics, 21, 12–1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC901018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001TC901018</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Lacombe, O., Bellahsen, N., and Mouthereau, F.: Fracture patterns in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt (Fars, Iran): Constraints on early collisional tectonic history and role of basement faults, Geol. Mag., 148, 940–963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100029X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S001675681100029X</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Leturmy, P., Molinaro, M., and de Lamotte, D. F.: Structure, timing and morphological signature of hidden reverse basement faults in the Fars Arc of the Zagros (Iran), Geol. Soc. Sp., 330, 121–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP330.7</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Li, S. and Urai, J. L.: Rheology of rock salt for salt tectonics modeling, Petrol. Sci., 13, 712–724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-016-0121-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12182-016-0121-6</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation> Madanipour, S., Najafi, M., Nozaem, R., Vergés, J., Yassaghi, A., Heydari, I., Khodaparast, S., Soudmand, Z., and Aghajari, L.: The Arabia–Eurasia Collision Zone in Iran: Tectonostratigraphic and Structural Synthesis, J. Petrol. Geol., 47, 123–71, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>McBeck, J., Cooke, M., Souloumiac, P., Maillot, B., and Mary, B.: The influence of detachment strength on the evolving deformational energy budget of physical accretionary prisms, Solid Earth, 9, 1421–1436, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1421-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-9-1421-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>McQuarrie, N.: Crustal scale geometry of the Zagros fold–thrust belt, Iran, J. Struct. Geol., 26, 519–535, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2003.08.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2003.08.009</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>McQuarrie, N. and Ehlers, T. A.: Techniques for understanding fold-and-thrust belt kinematics and thermal evolution, in: Linkages and Feedbacks in Orogenic Systems, edited by: Law, R. D., Thigpen, J. R., Merschat, A. J., and Stowell, H. H, Geological Society of America, Boulder, 25–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2017.1213(02)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/2017.1213(02)</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Mitra, S.: A unified kinematic model for the evolution of detachment folds, J. Struct. Geol., 25,1659-1673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00198-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00198-0</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Molinaro, M., Leturmy, P., Guezou, J. C., Frizon de Lamotte, D., and Eshraghi, S. A.: The structure and kinematics of the southeastern Zagros fold-thrust belt, Iran: From thin-skinned to thick-skinned tectonics, Tectonics, 24, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004TC001633</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Moresi, L., Dufour, F., Muhlhaus, H. B.: A Lagrangian integration point ?nite element method for large deformation modeling of viscoelastic geomaterials, J. Comput. Phys., 184, 476–497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00031-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00031-1</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Moresi, L., Quenette, S., Lemiale, V., Meriaux, C., Appelbe, B., and Muhlhaus, H. B.: Computational approaches to studying non-linear dynamics of the crust and mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 163, 69–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Morley, C. K., King, R., Hillis, R., Tingay, M., and Backe, G.: Deepwater fold and thrust belt classification, tectonics, structure and hydrocarbon prospectivity: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 104, 41–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.010</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Motamedi, H. and Gharabeigli, G.: Structural style in the Fars geological province: Interaction of diapirism and multidécollement folding, in: Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics, edited by: Farzipour Saein, A., Elsevier, 145–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-1.00009-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-1.00009-3</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Motamedi, H., Sherkati, S., and Sepehr, M.: Structural style variation and its impact on hydrocarbon traps in central Fars, southern Zagros folded belt, Iran, J. Struct. Geol., 37, 124–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.01.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2012.01.021</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., and Meyer, B.: The Zagros folded belt (Fars, Iran): Constraints from topography and critical wedge modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 165, 336–356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02855.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02855.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Mouthereau, F., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Lacombe, O., De Boisgrollier, T., and Kargar, S.: Tertiary sequence of deformation in a thin-skinned/thick-skinned collision belt: The Zagros Folded Belt (Fars, Iran), Tectonics, 26, TC5006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007TC002098</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Kargar, S., and Amrouch, K.: Mechanical Constraints on the Development of the Zagros Folded Belt (Fars), in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., Vergés, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247–266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_13</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., and Vergés, J.: Building the Zagros collisional orogen: Timing, strain distribution and the dynamics of Arabia/Eurasia plate convergence, Tectonophysics, 532–535, 27–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Najafi, M. and Lajmorak, S.: Contractional salt-tectonic system in the south Dezful embayment, Zagros, J. Struct. Geol., 141, 104–204. <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104204</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Najafi, M., Yassaghi, A., Bahroudi, A., Vergés, J., and Sherkati, S.: Impact of the Late Triassic Dashtak intermediate décollement horizon on anticline geometry in the Central Frontal Fars, SE Zagros fold belt, Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 54, 23–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.010</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Najafi, M., Vergés, J., Etemad-Saeed, N., and Karimnejad, H. R.: Folding, thrusting and diapirism: Competing mechanisms for shaping the structure of the north Dezful Embayment, Zagros, Iran, Basin Res., 30, 1200–1229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/bre.12300</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Najafi, M., Beamud, E., Ruh, J., Mouthereau, F., Tahmasbi, A., Bernaola, G., Yassaghi, A., Motamedi, H., Sherkati, S., Goodarzi, M. G. H., and Vergés, J.: Pliocene growth of the Dowlatabad syncline in Frontal Fars arc: Folding propagation across the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran, GSA Bulletin, 133, 1381–1403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/B35748.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/B35748.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Navabpour, P., Angelier, J., and Barrier, E.: Mesozoic extensional brittle tectonics of the Arabian passive margin, inverted in the Zagros collision (Iran, interior Fars), Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 330, 65–96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP330.5</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Nilforoushan, F., Masson, F., Vernant, P., Vigny, C., Martinod, J., Abbassi, M., Nankali, H., Hatzfeld, D., Bayer, R., Tavakoli, F., Ashtiani, A., Doerflinger, E., Daignières, M., Collard, P., and Chéry, J.: GPS network monitors the Arabia–Eurasia collision deformation in Iran, J. Geodesy, 77, 411–422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0326-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00190-003-0326-5</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Nilfouroushan, F., Pysklywec, R., Cruden, A., and Koyi, H.: Thermal-mechanical modeling of salt-based mountain belts with pre-existing basement faults: Application to the Zagros fold and thrust belt, southwest Iran, Tectonics, 32, 1212–1226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/tect.20075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/tect.20075</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Nissen, E., Tatar, M., Jackson, J. A., and Allen, M. B.: New views on earthquake faulting in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt of Iran, Geophys. J. Int., 186, 928–944, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05119.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05119.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Nissen, E., Jackson, J., Jahani, S., and Tatar, M.: Zagros “phantom earthquakes” reassessed—The interplay of seismicity and deep salt flow in the Simply Folded Belt?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 3561–3583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JB010796</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Nissen, E., Ghods, A., Karasözen, E., Elliott, J. R., Barnhart, W. D., Bergman, E. A., Hayes, G. P., Jamal-Reyhani, M., Nemati, M., Tan, F., and Abdulnaby, W.: The 12 November 2017<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 Ezgeleh-Sarpolzahab (Iran) earthquake and active tectonics of the Lurestan Arc, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 2124–2152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JB016221</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Orjuela, M.Á., Martínez-Sánchez, D. A., and Jiménez, G.: Structural changes caused by dips in lateral ramps of fold and thrust belts, Boletín de Geología, 43, 29–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v43n2-2021002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18273/revbol.v43n2-2021002</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Parizot, O., Missenard, Y., Barbarand, J., Blaise, T., Benedicto, A., Haurine, F., and Sarda, P.: How sensitive are intraplate inherited structures? Insight from the Cévennes Fault System (Languedoc, SE France), Geol. Mag., 159, 2082–2094, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756822000152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0016756822000152</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Pfiffner, O. A.: Thick-skinned and thin-skinned tectonics: A global perspective, Geosciences, 7, 71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/geosciences7030071</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Pfiffner, O. A., Schlunegger, F., and Buiter, S. J. H.: The Swiss Alps and their peripheral foreland basin: Stratigraphic response to deep crustal processes, Tectonics, 21, 3–1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000TC900039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000TC900039</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Pirouz, M., Avouac, J. P., Hassanzadeh, J., Kirschvink, J. L., and Bahroudi, A.: Early Neogene foreland of the Zagros, implications for the initial closure of the Neo-Tethys and kinematics of crustal shortening, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 477, 168–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.046</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Pla, O., Roca, E., Xie, H., Izquierdo-Llavall, E., Muñoz, J. A., Rowan, M. G., Ferrer, O., Gratacós, Ò., Yuan, N., and Huang, S.: Influence of syntectonic sedimentation and décollement rheology on the geometry and evolution of orogenic wedges: Analog modeling of the Kuqa fold-and-thrust belt (NW China), Tectonics, 38, 2727–2755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018TC005386</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation> Pohn, H. A.: Lateral ramps in the folded Appalachians and in overthrust belts worldwide: A fundamental element of thrust-belt architecture, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 63, ISBN 0607962283, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Priestley, K., McKenzie, D., Barron, J., Tatar, M., and Debayle, E.: The Zagros core: Deformation of the continental lithospheric mantle, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GC004435</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Ranalli, G. and Murphy, D. C.: Rheological stratification of the lithosphere, Tectonophysics, 132, 281–295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90348-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(87)90348-9</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Regard, V., Bellier, O., Thomas, J. C., Abbassi, M. R., Mercier, J., Shabanian, E., Feghhi, K., and Soleymani, S.: Accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia convergence in the Zagros-Makran transfer zone, SE Iran: A transition between collision and subduction through a young deforming system, Tectonics, 23, 1–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003TC001599</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Ruh, J. B. and Vergés, J.: Effects of reactivated extensional basement faults on structural evolution of fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical modelling applied to the Kopet Dagh Mountains, Tectonophysics, 746, 493–511, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.020</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Ruh, J. B., Kaus, B. J. P., and Burg, J. P.: Numerical investigation of deformation mechanics in fold-and-thrust belts: Influence of rheology of single and multiple décollements, Tectonics, 31, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC003047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011TC003047</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>Ruh, J. B., Hirt, A. M., Burg, J. P., and Mohammadi, A.: Forward propagation of the Zagros Simply Folded Belt constrained from magnetostratigraphy of growth strata, Tectonics, 33, 1534–1551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013TC003465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013TC003465</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>Ruh, J. B., Tokle, L., and Behr, W. M.: Grain-size-evolution controls on lithospheric weakening during continental rifting, Nat. Geosci., 15, 585–590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00964-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-022-00964-9</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>Santolaria, P., Harris, L. B., Casas, A. M., and Soto, R.: Influence of décollement-cover thickness variations in fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from centrifuge analog modeling, J. Struct. Geol., 163, 104704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2022.104704" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2022.104704</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>Saura, E., Vergés, J., Homke, S., Blanc, E., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Casciello, E., and Hunt, D. W.: Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, J. Geol. Soc., 168, 235–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/0016-76492010-092</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>Sepehr, M. and Cosgrove, J. W.: Structural framework of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 21, 829–843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.07.006</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>Sharp, I., Gillespie, P., Morsalnezhad, D., Taberner, C., Karpuz, R., Vergés, J., Horbury, A., Pickard, N., Garland, J., and Hunt, D.: Stratigraphic architecture and fracture-controlled dolomitization of the Cretaceous Khami and Bangestan groups: an outcrop case study, Zagros Mountains, Iran, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 329, 343–396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP329.14" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP329.14</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>Sherkati, S. and Letouzey, J.: Variation of structural style and basin evolution in the central Zagros (Izeh zone and Dezful Embayment), Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 21, 535–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.01.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.01.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>Sherkati, S., Molinaro, M., Frizon de Lamotte, D., and Letouzey, J.: Décollement folding in the Central and Eastern Zagros fold-belt (Iran): Salt mobility, multiple décollements and late basement control, J. Struct. Geol., 27, 1680–1696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.010</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>Sherkati, S., Letouzey, J., and De Lamotte, D. F.: Central Zagros fold-thrust belt (Iran): New insights from seismic data, field observation, and sandbox modeling, Tectonics, 25, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004TC001766</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, G. D.: Mechanical modelling of folding versus faulting in brittle–ductile wedges, J. Struct. Geol., 31, 369–381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.01.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2009.01.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, G. D.: Formation of accretionary prisms influenced by sediment subduction and supplied by sediments from adjacent continents, Geology, 38, 131–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G30461.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G30461.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>Simpson, G.: Mechanics of non-critical fold–thrust belts based on finite element models, Tectonophysics, 499, 142–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.01.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2011.01.004</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>Snidero, M., Carrera, N., Mencos, J., Butillé, M., Granado, P., Tavani, S., Lopez-Mir, B., Sàbat, F., and Muñoz, J. A.: Diapir kinematics in a multi-layer salt system from the eastern Persian Gulf, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 117, 104402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104402</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>Spitz, R., Bauville, A., Epard, J.-L., Kaus, B. J. P., Popov, A. A., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Control of 3-D tectonic inheritance on fold-and-thrust belts: insights from 3-D numerical models and application to the Helvetic nappe system, Solid Earth, 11, 999–1026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-999-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-11-999-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>Stöcklin, J.: Possible ancient continental margins in Iran, in: The geology of continental margins, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 873—887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_64" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_64</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>Stockmal, G. S., Beaumont, C., Nguyen, M., and Lee, B.: Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical models, in: Whence the Mountains? Inquiries into the Evolution of Orogenic Systems: A Volume in Honor of Raymond A. Price, edited by: Sears, J. W., Harms, T. A., and Evenchick, C. A., Geological Society of America Special, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA, 63–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2433(04)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/2007.2433(04)</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>Stöckhert, B., Brix, M. R., Kleinschrodt, R., Hurford, A. J., and Wirth, R.: Thermochronometry and microstructures of quartz — a comparison with experimental flow laws and predictions on the temperature of the brittle-plastic transition, J. Struct. Geol., 21, 351–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00138-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00138-0</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>Szabo, F. and Kheradpir, A.: Permian and Triassic stratigraphy, Zagros basin, south-west Iran, J. Petrol. Geol., 1, 57–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1978.tb00611.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1747-5457.1978.tb00611.x</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>Taghikhani, H., Yassaghi, A., Madanipour, S., and Najafi, M.: Salt tectonics along the High Zagros Fault in Iran, faulting through welded salt walls, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 259, 105928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105928" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105928</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>Talbot, C. J. and Alavi, M.: The past of a future syntaxis across the Zagros, Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ., 100, 89–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.100.01.08" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.100.01.08</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>Talebian, M. and Jackson, J.: A reappraisal of earthquake focal mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountains of Iran, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 506–526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02092.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02092.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>Tatar, M., Hatzfeld, D., and Ghafory-Ashtiany, M.: Tectonics of the Central Zagros (Iran) deduced from microearthquake seismicity, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 255–266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02145.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02145.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>Tavani, S., Storti, F., Lacombe, O., Corradetti, A., Muñoz, J. A., and Mazzoli, S.: A review of deformation pattern templates in foreland basin systems and fold-and-thrust belts: Implications for the state of stress in the frontal regions of thrust wedges, Earth-Sci. Rev., 141, 82–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.013</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>Tavani, S., Parente, M., Vitale, S., Iannace, A., Corradetti, A., Bottini, C., Morsalnejad, D., and Mazzoli, S.: Early Jurassic rifting of the Arabian passive continental margin of the Neo-Tethys. Field evidence from the Lurestan region of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Iran, Tectonics, 37, 2586–2607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018TC005192</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>Teknik, V. and Ghods, A.: Depth of magnetic basement in Iran based on fractal spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 209, 1878–1891, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggx132</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>Tunini, L., Jiménez-Munt, I., Fernandez, M., Vergés, J., and Villasenor, A.: Lithospheric mantle heterogeneities beneath the Zagros Mountains and the Iranian Plateau: a petrological-geophysical study, Geophys. J. Int., 200, 596–614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggu418</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation> van Zelst, I., Crameri, F., Pusok, A. E., Glerum, A., Dannberg, J., and Thieulot, C.: 101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth, Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>Vergés, J., Goodarzi, M. G. H., Emami, H., Karpuz, R., Efstathiou, J., and Gillespie, P.: Multiple detachmnet folding in Pusht-e Kuh Arc, zagros: Role of mechanical stratigraphy, AAPG Memoir., 94, 69–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/13251333M942899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/13251333M942899</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>Vergés, J., Emami, H., Garcés, M., Beamud, E., Homke, S., and Skott, P.: Zagros foreland fold belt timing across Lurestan to constrain Arabia–Iran collision, in: Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics, Vol. 3, edited by: Mukherjee, S., Elsevier, 29–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-4.00003-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-4.00003-7</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>Vergés, J., Casini, G., Ruh, J., Cosgrove, J., Sherkati, S., Najafi, M., Casciello, E., Saura, E., Fard, I. A., Piryaei, A., and de Lamotte, D. F.: Structural style and timing of NW-SE trending Zagros folds in SW Iran: Interaction with north-south trending Arabian folds and implications for petroleum geology, J. Petrol. Geol., 47, 3–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/jpg.12850</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>Vogt, K., Matenco, L., and Cloetingh, S.: Crustal mechanics control the geometry of mountain belts. Insights from numerical modelling, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 460, 12–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.016</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>Wallace, W. K. and Homza, T. X.: Décollement folds with fixed hinges and variable décollement depth, northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska: Reply, J. Struct. Geol., 20, 1591–1595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00040-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00040-6</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>Walpersdorf, A., Hatzfeld, D., Nankali, H., Tavakoli, F., Nilforoushan, F., Tatar, M., Vernant, P., Chéry, J., and Masson, F.: Difference in the GPS deformation pattern of North and Central Zagros (Iran), Geophys. J. Int., 167, 1077–1088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03147.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03147.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>White, S. H., Bretan, P. G., and Rutter, E. H.: Fault-zone reactivation: kinematics and mechanisms, Philos. T. R. Soc. S.-A, 317, 81–97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1986.0026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.1986.0026</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>Wilks, K. R. and Carter, N. L.: Rheology of some continental lower crustal rocks, Tectonophysics, 182, 57–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>Wortel, R., Govers, R., and Spakman, W.: Continental Collision and the STEP-Wise Evolution of Convergent Plate Boundaries: From Structure to Dynamics, in: Subduction Zone Geodynamics, edited by: Lallemand, S. and Funiciello, F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 47–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_3</ext-link>, 2009. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>Yamato, P., Kaus, B. J. P., Mouthereau, F., and Castelltort, S.: Dynamic constraints on the crustal-scale rheology of the Zagros fold belt, Iran, Geology, 39, 815–818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G32136.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/G32136.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>Zwaan, F., Schreurs, G., Buiter, S. J. H., Ferrer, O., Reitano, R., Rudolf, M., and Willingshofer, E.: Analogue modelling of basin inversion: a review and future perspectives, Solid Earth, 13, 1859–1905, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1859-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-13-1859-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Importance of basement faulting and salt decoupling for the structural evolution of the Fars Arc (Zagros fold-and-thrust belt): a numerical modeling approach</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., and Mouthereau, F.:
Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): Constraints from collisional and earlier deformation, Int. J. Earth Sci., 94, 401–419, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-005-0481-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-005-0481-4</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., Whitechurch, H., Vrielynck, B., Spakman, W., Monié, P., Meyer, B., and Wortel, R.:
Zagros orogeny: A subduction-dominated process, Geol. Mag., 148, 692–725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100046X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100046X</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alavi, M.:
Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution, Am. J. Sci., 304, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.304.1.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.304.1.1</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aldega, L., Bigi, S., Carminati, E., Trippetta, F., Corrado, S., and Kavoosi, M. A.:
The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt in the Fars province (Iran): II. Thermal evolution, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 93, 376–390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.022</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bahroudi, A. and Koyi, H. A.:
Effect of spatial distribution of Hormuz salt on deformation style in the Zagros fold and thrust belt: An analogue modelling approach, J. Geol. Soc., 160, 719–733, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-135</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barber, D. E., Stockli, D. F., and Galster, F.:
The Proto-Zagros foreland basin in Lorestan, western Iran: Insights from multimineral detrital geothermochronometric and trace elemental provenance analysis, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 2657–2680, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008185</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barchi, M. R. and Tavarnelli, E.: Thin vs. thick-skinned tectonics in the Umbria-Marche fold-and-thrust belt: Contrast or coexistence?, in: From the Guajira Desert to the Apennines, and from Mediterranean Microplates to the Mexican Killer Asteroid: Honoring the Career of Walter Alvarez, edited by: Koeberl, C., Claeys, P., and Montanari, A., Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA, 557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2022.2557(05)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/2022.2557(05)</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauville, A. and Schmalholz, S. M.: Transition from thin-to thick-skinned tectonics and consequences for nappe formation: Numerical simulations and applications to the Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland, Tectonophysics, 665, 101–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.030</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauville, A. and Schmalholz, S. M.: Tectonic inheritance and kinematic strain localization as trigger for the formation of the Helvetic nappes, Switzerland, Swiss J. Geosci., 110, 523–534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-017-0260-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-017-0260-9</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berberian, M.:
Master “blind” thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics, Tectonophysics, 241, 193–224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-C</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berberian, M. and King, G. C. P.:
Towards a Paleogeography and Tectonic Evolution of Iran, Can. J. Earth Sci., 18, 210–265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bernaola, G., Sharp, I. R., Blanc, E., Saura, E., Hunt, D. W., Fernandez, N., Embry, J. C., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Casini, G., Casciello, E., Romaire, I., and Homke, S.:
Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, J. Geol. Soc., 168, 235–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blanc, E. J. P., Allen, M. B., Inger, S., and Hassani, H.:
Structural styles in the Zagros Simple Folded Zone, Iran, J. Geol. Soc., 160, 401–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-110</a>,2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bonini, M., Sani, F., and Antonielli, B.:
Basin inversion and contractional reactivation of inherited normal faults: A review based on previous and new experimental models, Tectonophysics, 522–523, 55–88, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.014</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borderie, S., Graveleau, F., Witt, C., and Vendeville, B. C.:
Impact of an interbedded viscous décollement on the structural and kinematic coupling in fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from analogue modeling, Tectonophysics, 722, 118–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.019</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borja, R. I. and Dreiss, S. J.: Numerical modeling of accretionary wedge mechanics: Application to the Barbados subduction problem, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9323–9339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB07p09323" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB07p09323</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boyer, S. E. and Elliott, D.:
Thrust systems, AAPG Bull.l, 66, 1196–1230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buiter, S. J. H. and Pfiffner, O. A.:
Numerical models of the inversion of half-graben basins, Tectonics, 22, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417</a>,2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Buiter, S. J., Schreurs, G., Albertz, M., Gerya, T. V., Kaus, B., Landry, W., Le Pourhiet, L., Mishin, Y., Egholm, D. L., Cooke, M., and Maillot, B.:
Benchmarking numerical models of brittle thrust wedges, J. Struct. Geol., 92, 140–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.003</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burbidge, D. R. and Braun, J.:
Numerical models of the evolution of accretionary wedges and fold-and-thrust belts using the distinct-element method, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 542–561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Callot, J. P., Jahani, S., and Letouzey, J.:
The Role of Pre-Existing Diapirs in Fold and Thrust Belt Development. Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: from fold kinematics to hydrocarbon systems, edited by:  Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., and Vergés, J., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 309–325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_16</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Callot, J. P., Trocmé, V., Letouzey, J., Albouy, E., Jahani, S., and Sherkati, S.:
Pre-existing salt structures and the folding of the Zagros Mountains, Geol. Soc. Sp., 363, 545–561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP363.27" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP363.27</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Crameri, F., Schmeling, H., Golabek, G. J., Duretz, T., Orendt, R., Buiter, S. J. H., May, D. A., Kaus, B. J. P., Gerya, T. V., and Tackley, P. J.:
A comparison of numerical surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: an evaluation of the `sticky air'method, Geophys. J. Int., 189, 38–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chapple, W. M.: Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 89, 1189–1198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89&lt;1189:MOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89&lt;1189:MOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1978.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cooper, M.:
Structural style and hydrocarbon prospectivity in fold and thrust belts: A global review, Geol. Soc. Sp., 272, 447–472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.272.01.23" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.272.01.23</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dal Zilio, L., Ruh, J., and Avouac, J. P.:
Structural evolution of orogenic wedges: interplay between erosion and weak décollements, Tectonics, 39, e2020TC006210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006210</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, D., Suppe, J., and Dahlen, F. A.: Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 1153–1172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Davis, D., Suppe, J., and Dahlen, F. A.: Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 88, 1153–1172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eslamirezaei, N., Alavi, S. A., Nabavi, S. T., and Ghassemi, M. R.:
Influence of multiple décollement and cover rock rheology on the structural evolution of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: insights from discrete element modelling, C. R. Geosci., 355, 215–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.224</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Etemad-Saeed, N., Najafi, M., and Vergés, J.:
Provenance evolution of Oligocene–Pliocene foreland deposits in the Dezful embayment to constrain Central Zagros exhumation history, J. Geol. Soc., 177, 799–817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2019-206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2019-206</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Falcon, N. L.:
Southern Iran: Zagros Mountains, Geol. Soc. Sp., 4, 199–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.004.01.11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.004.01.11</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerya, T.:
Introduction to numerical geodynamic modelling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 358 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534243</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerya, T.: Numerical modeling of subduction: State of the art and future directions, Geosphere, 18, 503–561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02416.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02416.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerya, T. V., Yuen, D. A.:
Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco–elasto–plastic thermo–mechanical problems, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 163, 83–105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fernandez, N. and Kaus, B. J.:
Influence of pre-existing salt diapirs on 3D folding patterns, Tectonophysics, 637, 354–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.021</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ghazian, R. K. and Buiter, S. J. H.:
Numerical modelling of the role of salt in continental collision: An application to the southeast Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Tectonophysics, 632, 96–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.006</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gomar, F., Ruh, J. B., Najafi, M., and Sobouti, F.: GIF videos of numerical modeling experiments, Figshare, <a href="https://figshare.com/s/cb0c7f5a9a6fda0e38ef" target="_blank"/>, last access: 3 Dezember 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goes, S., Hasterok, D., Schutt, D. L., and Klöcking, M.:
Continental lithospheric temperatures: A review, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 306, 106509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106509</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Granado, P. and Ruh, J. B.:
Numerical modelling of inversion tectonics in fold-and-thrust belts, Tectonophysics, 763, 14–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.033</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hasterok, D. and Chapman, D. S.:
Heat production and geotherms for the continental lithosphere, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 59–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.034</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hassanpour, J., Yassaghi, A., Muñoz, J. A., and Jahani, S.:
Salt tectonics in a double salt-source layer setting (Eastern Persian Gulf, Iran): Insights from interpretation of seismic profiles and sequential cross-section restoration, Basin Res., 33, 159–185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12459</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hessami, K., Koyi, H. A., Talbot, C. J., Tabasi, H., and Shabanian, E.:
Progressive unconformities within an evolving foreland fold-thrust belt, Zagros Mountains, J. Geol. Soc., 158, 969–982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-007</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heydarzadeh, K., Ruh, J. B., Vergés, J., Hajialibeigi, H., and Gharabeigli, G.: Evolution of a structural basin: numerical modelling applied to the Dehdasht Basin, Central Zagros, Iran, J. Asian Earth Sci., 187, 104088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104088</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Homke, S., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Sharp, I., Garcés, M., Montero-Verdú, I., Karpuz, R., and Goodarzi, M. H.: Late Cretaceous–Paleocene formation of the proto–Zagros foreland basin, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 121, 963–978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/B26035.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/B26035.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Humair, F., Bauville, A., Epard, J. L., and Schmalholz, S. M.:
Interaction of folding and thrusting during fold-and-thrust-belt evolution: Insights from numerical simulations and application to the Swiss Jura and the Canadian Foothills., Tectonophysics, 789, 228474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228474" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228474</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ismail-Zadeh, A. and Tackley, P.: Computational methods for geodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 301 pp, ISBN 9781139489355, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, J. and Fitch, T.:
Basement faulting and the focal depths of the larger earthquakes in the Zagros mountains (Iran), Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 64, 561–586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02685.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02685.x</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, J. and McKenzie, D.: Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan, Geophys. J. Int., 77, 185–264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01931.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01931.x</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, J. A.:
Reactivation of basement faults and crustal shortening in orogenic belts, Nature, 283, 343–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/283343a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/283343a0</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, M. P. A. and Hudec, M. R.: Salt Tectonics: Principles and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 498 pp., ISBN 1107013313, 9781107013315, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, M. P. A. and Vendeville, B. C.:
Regional extension as a geologic trigger for diapirism, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 106, 57–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106&lt;0057:REAAGT&gt;2.3.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106&lt;0057:REAAGT&gt;2.3.CO;2</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., Letouzey, J., and De Lamotte, D. F.:
The eastern termination of the Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt, Iran: Structures, evolution, and relationships between salt plugs, folding, and faulting, Tectonics, 28, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002418</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., de Lamotte, D. F., Letouzey, J., and Leturmy, P.: The Salt Diapirs of the Eastern Fars Province (Zagros, Iran): A Brief Outline of Their Past and Present, in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., and Vergés, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 289–308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_15" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_15</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jahani, S., Hassanpour, J., Mohammadi-Firouz, S., Letouzey, J., de Lamotte, D. F., Alavi, S. A., and Soleimany, B.: Salt tectonics and tear faulting in the central part of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran, Mar. Pet. Geol., 86, 426–446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.003</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jamalreyhani, M., Pousse-Beltran, L., Büyükakpınar, P., Cesca, S., Nissen, E., Ghods, A., López-Comino, J.Á., Rezapour, M., and Najafi, M.:
The 2019–2020 Khalili (Iran) Earthquake Sequence—Anthropogenic Seismicity in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, 2021JB022797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022797</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiménez-Munt, I., Fernández, M., Saura, E., Vergés, J., and García-Castellanos, D.: 3-D lithospheric structure and regional/residual Bouguer anomalies in the Arabia–Eurasia collision (Iran), Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1311–1324, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05580.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05580.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karasözen, E., Nissen, E., Bergman, E. A., and Ghods, A.:
Seismotectonics of the Zagros (Iran) From Orogen-Wide, Calibrated Earthquake Relocations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 9109–9129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017336</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kendall, J., Vergés, J., Koshnaw, R., and Louterbach, M.:
Petroleum tectonic comparison of fold and thrust belts: the Zagros of Iraq and Iran, the Pyrenees of Spain, the Sevier of Western USA and the Beni Sub-Andean of Bolivia, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 490, 79–103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP490-2018-102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP490-2018-102</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kent, P. E.: Recent Studies of South Persian Salt Plugs, AAPG Bull., 42, 2951–2972, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d</a>, 1958.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kent, P. E.:
Recent Studies of South Persian Salt Plugs, AAPG Bull., 42, 2951–2972, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d</a>, 1958.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khadivi, S., Mouthereau, F., Larrasoaña, J. C., Vergés, J., Lacombe, O., Khademi, E., Beamud, E., Melinte-Dobrinescu, M., and Suc, J. P.: Magnetochronology of synorogenic Miocene foreland sediments in the Fars arc of the Zagros Folded Belt (SW Iran), Basin Res., 22, 918–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00446.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00446.x</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kiss, D., Duretz, T., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Tectonic inheritance controls nappe detachment, transport and stacking in the Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland: insights from thermomechanical simulations, Solid Earth, 11, 287–305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-287-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-287-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koshnaw, R. I., Stockli, D. F., and Schlunegger, F.:
Timing of the Arabia-Eurasia continental collision—Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of the Red Bed Series strata of the northwest Zagros hinterland, Kurdistan region of Iraq, Geology, 47, 47–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G45499.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G45499.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koyi, H. A. and Mansurbeg, H.:
The Role of Multiple Weak Lithologies in the Deformation of Cover Units in the Northwestern Segment of the Zagros FOLD-AND-THRUST Belt, J. Petrol. Geol., 44, 145–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12783</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lacombe, O. and Mouthereau, F.:
Basement-involved shortening and deep décollement tectonics in forelands of orogens: Insights from recent collision belts (Taiwan, Western Alps, Pyrenees), Tectonics, 21, 12–1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC901018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC901018</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lacombe, O., Bellahsen, N., and Mouthereau, F.:
Fracture patterns in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt (Fars, Iran): Constraints on early collisional tectonic history and role of basement faults, Geol. Mag., 148, 940–963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100029X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100029X</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leturmy, P., Molinaro, M., and de Lamotte, D. F.:
Structure, timing and morphological signature of hidden reverse basement faults in the Fars Arc of the Zagros (Iran), Geol. Soc. Sp., 330, 121–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.7</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, S. and Urai, J. L.: Rheology of rock salt for salt tectonics modeling, Petrol. Sci., 13, 712–724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-016-0121-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-016-0121-6</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Madanipour, S., Najafi, M., Nozaem, R., Vergés, J., Yassaghi, A., Heydari, I., Khodaparast, S., Soudmand, Z., and Aghajari, L.:
The Arabia–Eurasia Collision Zone in Iran: Tectonostratigraphic and Structural Synthesis, J. Petrol. Geol., 47, 123–71, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
McBeck, J., Cooke, M., Souloumiac, P., Maillot, B., and Mary, B.:
The influence of detachment strength on the evolving deformational energy budget of physical accretionary prisms, Solid Earth, 9, 1421–1436, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1421-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1421-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
McQuarrie, N.:
Crustal scale geometry of the Zagros fold–thrust belt, Iran, J. Struct. Geol., 26, 519–535, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2003.08.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2003.08.009</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
McQuarrie, N. and Ehlers, T. A.: Techniques for understanding fold-and-thrust belt kinematics and thermal evolution, in: Linkages and Feedbacks in Orogenic Systems, edited by: Law, R. D., Thigpen, J. R., Merschat, A. J., and Stowell, H. H, Geological Society of America, Boulder, 25–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2017.1213(02)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/2017.1213(02)</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mitra, S.:
A unified kinematic model for the evolution of detachment folds, J. Struct. Geol., 25,1659-1673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00198-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00198-0</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Molinaro, M., Leturmy, P., Guezou, J. C., Frizon de Lamotte, D., and Eshraghi, S. A.:
The structure and kinematics of the southeastern Zagros fold-thrust belt, Iran: From thin-skinned to thick-skinned tectonics, Tectonics, 24, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001633" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001633</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moresi, L., Dufour, F., Muhlhaus, H. B.:
A Lagrangian integration point ?nite element method for large deformation modeling of viscoelastic geomaterials, J. Comput. Phys., 184, 476–497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00031-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00031-1</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moresi, L., Quenette, S., Lemiale, V., Meriaux, C., Appelbe, B., and Muhlhaus, H. B.:
Computational approaches to studying non-linear dynamics of the crust and mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 163, 69–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morley, C. K., King, R., Hillis, R., Tingay, M., and Backe, G.:
Deepwater fold and thrust belt classification, tectonics, structure and hydrocarbon prospectivity: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 104, 41–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.010</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Motamedi, H. and Gharabeigli, G.: Structural style in the Fars geological province: Interaction of diapirism and multidécollement folding, in: Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics, edited by: Farzipour Saein, A., Elsevier, 145–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-1.00009-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-1.00009-3</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Motamedi, H., Sherkati, S., and Sepehr, M.:
Structural style variation and its impact on hydrocarbon traps in central Fars, southern Zagros folded belt, Iran, J. Struct. Geol., 37, 124–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.01.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.01.021</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., and Meyer, B.:
The Zagros folded belt (Fars, Iran): Constraints from topography and critical wedge modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 165, 336–356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02855.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02855.x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mouthereau, F., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Lacombe, O., De Boisgrollier, T., and Kargar, S.: Tertiary sequence of deformation in a thin-skinned/thick-skinned collision belt: The Zagros Folded Belt (Fars, Iran), Tectonics, 26, TC5006, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002098</a>, 2007a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Kargar, S., and Amrouch, K.: Mechanical Constraints on the Development of the Zagros Folded Belt (Fars), in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., Vergés, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247–266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_13</a>, 2007b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., and Vergés, J.:
Building the Zagros collisional orogen: Timing, strain distribution and the dynamics of Arabia/Eurasia plate convergence, Tectonophysics, 532–535, 27–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Najafi, M. and Lajmorak, S.:
Contractional salt-tectonic system in the south Dezful embayment, Zagros, J. Struct. Geol., 141, 104–204. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104204</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Najafi, M., Yassaghi, A., Bahroudi, A., Vergés, J., and Sherkati, S.:
Impact of the Late Triassic Dashtak intermediate décollement horizon on anticline geometry in the Central Frontal Fars, SE Zagros fold belt, Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 54, 23–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.010</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Najafi, M., Vergés, J., Etemad-Saeed, N., and Karimnejad, H. R.:
Folding, thrusting and diapirism: Competing mechanisms for shaping the structure of the north Dezful Embayment, Zagros, Iran, Basin Res., 30, 1200–1229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12300</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Najafi, M., Beamud, E., Ruh, J., Mouthereau, F., Tahmasbi, A., Bernaola, G., Yassaghi, A., Motamedi, H., Sherkati, S., Goodarzi, M. G. H., and Vergés, J.:
Pliocene growth of the Dowlatabad syncline in Frontal Fars arc: Folding propagation across the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran, GSA Bulletin, 133, 1381–1403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/B35748.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/B35748.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navabpour, P., Angelier, J., and Barrier, E.:
Mesozoic extensional brittle tectonics of the Arabian passive margin, inverted in the Zagros collision (Iran, interior Fars), Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 330, 65–96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.5</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nilforoushan, F., Masson, F., Vernant, P., Vigny, C., Martinod, J., Abbassi, M., Nankali, H., Hatzfeld, D., Bayer, R., Tavakoli, F., Ashtiani, A., Doerflinger, E., Daignières, M., Collard, P., and Chéry, J.:
GPS network monitors the Arabia–Eurasia collision deformation in Iran, J. Geodesy, 77, 411–422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0326-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0326-5</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nilfouroushan, F., Pysklywec, R., Cruden, A., and Koyi, H.: Thermal-mechanical modeling of salt-based mountain belts with pre-existing basement faults: Application to the Zagros fold and thrust belt, southwest Iran, Tectonics, 32, 1212–1226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/tect.20075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/tect.20075</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nissen, E., Tatar, M., Jackson, J. A., and Allen, M. B.: New views on earthquake faulting in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt of Iran, Geophys. J. Int., 186, 928–944, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05119.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05119.x</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nissen, E., Jackson, J., Jahani, S., and Tatar, M.: Zagros “phantom earthquakes” reassessed—The interplay of seismicity and deep salt flow in the Simply Folded Belt?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 3561–3583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010796</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nissen, E., Ghods, A., Karasözen, E., Elliott, J. R., Barnhart, W. D., Bergman, E. A., Hayes, G. P., Jamal-Reyhani, M., Nemati, M., Tan, F., and Abdulnaby, W.:
The 12 November 2017<i>M</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> 7.3 Ezgeleh-Sarpolzahab (Iran) earthquake and active tectonics of the Lurestan Arc, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 2124–2152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016221</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Orjuela, M.Á., Martínez-Sánchez, D. A., and Jiménez, G.:
Structural changes caused by dips in lateral ramps of fold and thrust belts, Boletín de Geología, 43, 29–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v43n2-2021002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v43n2-2021002</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
Parizot, O., Missenard, Y., Barbarand, J., Blaise, T., Benedicto, A., Haurine, F., and Sarda, P.:
How sensitive are intraplate inherited structures? Insight from the Cévennes Fault System (Languedoc, SE France), Geol. Mag., 159, 2082–2094, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756822000152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756822000152</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pfiffner, O. A.:
Thick-skinned and thin-skinned tectonics: A global perspective, Geosciences, 7, 71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030071</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pfiffner, O. A., Schlunegger, F., and Buiter, S. J. H.:
The Swiss Alps and their peripheral foreland basin: Stratigraphic response to deep crustal processes, Tectonics, 21, 3–1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000TC900039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000TC900039</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pirouz, M., Avouac, J. P., Hassanzadeh, J., Kirschvink, J. L., and Bahroudi, A.:
Early Neogene foreland of the Zagros, implications for the initial closure of the Neo-Tethys and kinematics of crustal shortening, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 477, 168–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.046</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pla, O., Roca, E., Xie, H., Izquierdo-Llavall, E., Muñoz, J. A., Rowan, M. G., Ferrer, O., Gratacós, Ò., Yuan, N., and Huang, S.: Influence of syntectonic sedimentation and décollement rheology on the geometry and evolution of orogenic wedges: Analog modeling of the Kuqa fold-and-thrust belt (NW China), Tectonics, 38, 2727–2755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005386</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pohn, H. A.: Lateral ramps in the folded Appalachians and in overthrust belts worldwide: A fundamental element of thrust-belt architecture, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 63, ISBN 0607962283, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Priestley, K., McKenzie, D., Barron, J., Tatar, M., and Debayle, E.: The Zagros core: Deformation of the continental lithospheric mantle, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004435</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ranalli, G. and Murphy, D. C.:
Rheological stratification of the lithosphere, Tectonophysics, 132, 281–295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90348-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90348-9</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Regard, V., Bellier, O., Thomas, J. C., Abbassi, M. R., Mercier, J., Shabanian, E., Feghhi, K., and Soleymani, S.:
Accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia convergence in the Zagros-Makran transfer zone, SE Iran: A transition between collision and subduction through a young deforming system, Tectonics, 23, 1–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001599</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruh, J. B. and Vergés, J.:
Effects of reactivated extensional basement faults on structural evolution of fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical modelling applied to the Kopet Dagh Mountains, Tectonophysics, 746, 493–511, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.020</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruh, J. B., Kaus, B. J. P., and Burg, J. P.:
Numerical investigation of deformation mechanics in fold-and-thrust belts: Influence of rheology of single and multiple décollements, Tectonics, 31, 1–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC003047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC003047</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruh, J. B., Hirt, A. M., Burg, J. P., and Mohammadi, A.:
Forward propagation of the Zagros Simply Folded Belt constrained from magnetostratigraphy of growth strata, Tectonics, 33, 1534–1551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013TC003465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013TC003465</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruh, J. B., Tokle, L., and Behr, W. M.:
Grain-size-evolution controls on lithospheric weakening during continental rifting, Nat. Geosci., 15, 585–590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00964-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00964-9</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
      
Santolaria, P., Harris, L. B., Casas, A. M., and Soto, R.:
Influence of décollement-cover thickness variations in fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from centrifuge analog modeling, J. Struct. Geol., 163, 104704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2022.104704" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2022.104704</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saura, E., Vergés, J., Homke, S., Blanc, E., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Casciello, E., and Hunt, D. W.: Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, J. Geol. Soc., 168, 235–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sepehr, M. and Cosgrove, J. W.:
Structural framework of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 21, 829–843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.07.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.07.006</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharp, I., Gillespie, P., Morsalnezhad, D., Taberner, C., Karpuz, R., Vergés, J., Horbury, A., Pickard, N., Garland, J., and Hunt, D.: Stratigraphic architecture and fracture-controlled dolomitization of the Cretaceous Khami and Bangestan groups: an outcrop case study, Zagros Mountains, Iran, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 329, 343–396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP329.14" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP329.14</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sherkati, S. and Letouzey, J.:
Variation of structural style and basin evolution in the central Zagros (Izeh zone and Dezful Embayment), Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 21, 535–554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.01.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.01.007</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sherkati, S., Molinaro, M., Frizon de Lamotte, D., and Letouzey, J.:
Décollement folding in the Central and Eastern Zagros fold-belt (Iran): Salt mobility, multiple décollements and late basement control, J. Struct. Geol., 27, 1680–1696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.010</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sherkati, S., Letouzey, J., and De Lamotte, D. F.:
Central Zagros fold-thrust belt (Iran): New insights from seismic data, field observation, and sandbox modeling, Tectonics, 25, 1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001766" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001766</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simpson, G. D.:
Mechanical modelling of folding versus faulting in brittle–ductile wedges, J. Struct. Geol., 31, 369–381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.01.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.01.011</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simpson, G. D.:
Formation of accretionary prisms influenced by sediment subduction and supplied by sediments from adjacent continents, Geology, 38, 131–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G30461.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G30461.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simpson, G.:
Mechanics of non-critical fold–thrust belts based on finite element models, Tectonophysics, 499, 142–155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.01.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.01.004</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snidero, M., Carrera, N., Mencos, J., Butillé, M., Granado, P., Tavani, S., Lopez-Mir, B., Sàbat, F., and Muñoz, J. A.: Diapir kinematics in a multi-layer salt system from the eastern Persian Gulf, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 117, 104402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104402</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spitz, R., Bauville, A., Epard, J.-L., Kaus, B. J. P., Popov, A. A., and Schmalholz, S. M.:
Control of 3-D tectonic inheritance on fold-and-thrust belts: insights from 3-D numerical models and application to the Helvetic nappe system, Solid Earth, 11, 999–1026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-999-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-999-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stöcklin, J.:
Possible ancient continental margins in Iran, in: The geology of continental margins, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 873—887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_64" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_64</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stockmal, G. S., Beaumont, C., Nguyen, M., and Lee, B.: Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical models, in: Whence the Mountains? Inquiries into the Evolution of Orogenic Systems: A Volume in Honor of Raymond A. Price, edited by: Sears, J. W., Harms, T. A., and Evenchick, C. A., Geological Society of America Special, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA, 63–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2433(04)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2433(04)</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stöckhert, B., Brix, M. R., Kleinschrodt, R., Hurford, A. J., and Wirth, R.: Thermochronometry and microstructures of quartz — a comparison with experimental flow laws and predictions on the temperature of the brittle-plastic transition, J. Struct. Geol., 21, 351–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00138-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00138-0</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szabo, F. and Kheradpir, A.:
Permian and Triassic stratigraphy, Zagros basin, south-west Iran, J. Petrol. Geol., 1, 57–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1978.tb00611.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1978.tb00611.x</a>, 1978.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taghikhani, H., Yassaghi, A., Madanipour, S., and Najafi, M.:
Salt tectonics along the High Zagros Fault in Iran, faulting through welded salt walls, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 259, 105928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105928" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105928</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
      
Talbot, C. J. and Alavi, M.: The past of a future syntaxis across the Zagros, Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ., 100, 89–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.100.01.08" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.100.01.08</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
      
Talebian, M. and Jackson, J.:
A reappraisal of earthquake focal mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountains of Iran, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 506–526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02092.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02092.x</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tatar, M., Hatzfeld, D., and Ghafory-Ashtiany, M.:
Tectonics of the Central Zagros (Iran) deduced from microearthquake seismicity, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 255–266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02145.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02145.x</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tavani, S., Storti, F., Lacombe, O., Corradetti, A., Muñoz, J. A., and Mazzoli, S.:
A review of deformation pattern templates in foreland basin systems and fold-and-thrust belts: Implications for the state of stress in the frontal regions of thrust wedges, Earth-Sci. Rev., 141, 82–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.013</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tavani, S., Parente, M., Vitale, S., Iannace, A., Corradetti, A., Bottini, C., Morsalnejad, D., and Mazzoli, S.: Early Jurassic rifting of the Arabian passive continental margin of the Neo-Tethys. Field evidence from the Lurestan region of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Iran, Tectonics, 37, 2586–2607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005192</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
      
Teknik, V. and Ghods, A.:
Depth of magnetic basement in Iran based on fractal spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 209, 1878–1891, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx132</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tunini, L., Jiménez-Munt, I., Fernandez, M., Vergés, J., and Villasenor, A.:
Lithospheric mantle heterogeneities beneath the Zagros Mountains and the Iranian Plateau: a petrological-geophysical study, Geophys. J. Int., 200, 596–614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu418</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Zelst, I., Crameri, F., Pusok, A. E., Glerum, A., Dannberg, J., and Thieulot, C.: 101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth, Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vergés, J., Goodarzi, M. G. H., Emami, H., Karpuz, R., Efstathiou, J., and Gillespie, P.:
Multiple detachmnet folding in Pusht-e Kuh Arc, zagros: Role of mechanical stratigraphy, AAPG Memoir., 94, 69–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/13251333M942899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/13251333M942899</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vergés, J., Emami, H., Garcés, M., Beamud, E., Homke, S., and Skott, P.: Zagros foreland fold belt timing across Lurestan to constrain Arabia–Iran collision, in: Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics, Vol. 3, edited by: Mukherjee, S., Elsevier, 29–52, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-4.00003-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-4.00003-7</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vergés, J., Casini, G., Ruh, J., Cosgrove, J., Sherkati, S., Najafi, M., Casciello, E., Saura, E., Fard, I. A., Piryaei, A., and de Lamotte, D. F.: Structural style and timing of NW-SE trending Zagros folds in SW Iran: Interaction with north-south trending Arabian folds and implications for petroleum geology, J. Petrol. Geol., 47, 3–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12850</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogt, K., Matenco, L., and Cloetingh, S.:
Crustal mechanics control the geometry of mountain belts. Insights from numerical modelling, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 460, 12–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.016</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wallace, W. K. and Homza, T. X.:
Décollement folds with fixed hinges and variable décollement depth, northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska: Reply, J. Struct. Geol., 20, 1591–1595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00040-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00040-6</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walpersdorf, A., Hatzfeld, D., Nankali, H., Tavakoli, F., Nilforoushan, F., Tatar, M., Vernant, P., Chéry, J., and Masson, F.:
Difference in the GPS deformation pattern of North and Central Zagros (Iran), Geophys. J. Int., 167, 1077–1088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03147.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03147.x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation>
      
White, S. H., Bretan, P. G., and Rutter, E. H.:
Fault-zone reactivation: kinematics and mechanisms, Philos. T. R. Soc. S.-A, 317, 81–97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1986.0026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1986.0026</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilks, K. R. and Carter, N. L.:
Rheology of some continental lower crustal rocks, Tectonophysics, 182, 57–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wortel, R., Govers, R., and Spakman, W.: Continental Collision and the STEP-Wise Evolution of Convergent Plate Boundaries: From Structure to Dynamics, in: Subduction Zone Geodynamics, edited by: Lallemand, S. and Funiciello, F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 47–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_3</a>, 2009.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>142</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamato, P., Kaus, B. J. P., Mouthereau, F., and Castelltort, S.:
Dynamic constraints on the crustal-scale rheology of the Zagros fold belt, Iran, Geology, 39, 815–818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/G32136.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/G32136.1</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>143</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zwaan, F., Schreurs, G., Buiter, S. J. H., Ferrer, O., Reitano, R., Rudolf, M., and Willingshofer, E.:
Analogue modelling of basin inversion: a review and future perspectives, Solid Earth, 13, 1859–1905, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1859-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1859-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
