<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-17-1063-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Petrogenesis and geodynamic setting of Ediacaran rocks from the Sirwa massif, Central Anti-Atlas of Morocco</article-title><alt-title>Petrogenesis and geodynamic setting of Ediacaran rocks from the Sirwa massif</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ben-Tami</surname><given-names>Abdelhay</given-names></name>
          <email>abdelhaybentami@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-8199</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Belkacim</surname><given-names>Saïd</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>El Kabouri</surname><given-names>Jamal</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Baidada</surname><given-names>Bouchra</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>Joshua H. F. L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-6012</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Perrot</surname><given-names>Morgann G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bhilisse</surname><given-names>Mohamed</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5845-6311</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Assalmi</surname><given-names>Mohamed</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ferraq</surname><given-names>Mariam</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Bouabdellah</surname><given-names>Mohamed</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire de Géologie Appliquée et Géo-Environnement, Département de la Géologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn Zohr, B.P.8106, Agadir, Morocco</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Zgounder Millennium Silver Mining, Aya Gold and Silver Group, Rue De L'epargne, Quartier Racine, Casablanca, Morocco</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Higher school of Technology, Fkih Ben Salah, Beni Mellal, Morocco</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Earth and Atmosphere Sciences, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Geology and Sustainable Mining Institute, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Benguerir, Morocco</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Abdelhay Ben-Tami (abdelhaybentami@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>1063</fpage><lpage>1086</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Abdelhay Ben-Tami et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e199">The geodynamic evolution of the post-Pan-African Anti-Atlas Orogeny (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 650 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) remains debated, particularly regarding the basement beneath the Central Anti-Atlas and the geological processes leading to the formation of the Ediacaran Saghro Group (SG) and Ouarzazate Group (OG). New LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages of 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained from two OG magmatic rocks. Detrital zircons from the SG yield a 2025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum depositional age (MDA) and a prominent 2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak, indicating exclusive recycling of Paleoproterozoic basement into the Ediacaran SG basin. Geochemically, two magmatic series are identified: (i) SG mafic rocks with a calc-alkaline, within-plate signature and negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies, consistent with a back-arc basin setting; and (ii) an OG felsic-intermediate, high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calc-alkaline to shoshonitic series of post-collisional character. Isotope data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6, TDM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02–0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SG; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">570</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1, TDM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.30–1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the OG) indicate that the SG formed from a near-pristine mantle source with limited crustal input, whereas the younger OG involved significant reworking of older, evolved continental crust.</p>

      <p id="d2e405">These findings support a model in which early Ediacaran SG sediments and associated magmatic rocks were deposited in a back-arc basin. During this basin development, its shoulders were locally formed by the 2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Paleoproterozoic basement, supplying Paleoproterozoic zircons to the Saghro basin without interaction with Ediacaran sediments and corroborating the extension of the Eburnian basement north of the Anti-Atlas Major Fault (AAMF). The younger OG subsequently recorded a late Ediacaran post-collisional crustal collapse event, during which lithospheric delamination and potential slab break-off drove widespread crustal reworking and emplacement of a Silicic Large Igneous Province (SLIP).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e425">The Anti-Atlas belt of Morocco, located along the northern margin of the West African Craton (WAC), bears witness to a long-lived geological evolution since the break-up of Rodinia (Hefferan et al., 2014; Gasquet et al., 2008; Thomas et al., 2002). Initial rifting at ca. 900–700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is recorded by the 885 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tonian mafic dikes. This rifting generated a passive margin along the WAC and eventually led to the development of Cryogenian oceanic lithosphere (Hefferan et al., 2014). This period is characterized by the deposition of the Lkest-Taghdout Group, a thick sequence of quartzites and carbonates (Álvaro et al., 2014b) (Fig. 1B). The subsequent evolution of the Anti-Atlas belt during the Ediacaran remains debated, despite major advances in understanding the multiple Neoproterozoic events that culminated in the final amalgamation of Gondwana (D'Lemos et al. 2006; Samson et al. 2004; Gasquet et al. 2008, 2005, 2004; Thomas et al. 2004, 2002; Ennih and Liégeois, 2008, 2001; Walsh et al. 2002). Based on paleogeographic reconstructions and lithostratigraphic correlations (Linnemann et al., 2014; Errami et al., 2021; Walsh et al., 2012), the Anti-Atlas belt was close to the Cadomian subduction system. Whereas Gondwana amalgamation was driven by large-scale Pan-African collisions between major cratonic blocks, the northern margin of the WAC experienced a synchronous but distinct tectonic regime (Rojo-Pérez et al., 2024; Stern, 2024; Hefferan et al., 2014). During the Ediacaran, this margin lay proximal to the Cadomian accretionary system, a long-lived subduction-related orogen that developed along the Gondwanan periphery (Linnemann et al., 2014; Nance et al., 2008).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e446"><bold>(A)</bold> Sketch map locating the Anti-Atlas belt in respect to Morocco (Saadi, 1985); <bold>(B)</bold> geological map of the Central and Eastern Anti-Atlas Proterozoic inliers (redrawn and modified after Michard et al. (2017); <bold>(C)</bold> Schematic representation of the geology of the Sirwa massif (compiled and redrawn from Thomas et al. (2002); location of the ZGMR in Fig. 2. Abbreviations: Taz: Tazoult quartz-porphyry (559 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); Im: Imourkhssen granite (562 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); Ti: Tikhfist rhyolite (571 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); Ask: Askaoun granodiorite (575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); Ig: Ighrem granite; Og: Ougougane granite; and SAF: South Atlas Fault. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages are from Thomas et al. (2002).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e536">It remains debated whether the Anti-Atlas records the post-collisional stage of the Pan-African belt or instead reflects the development of a back-arc basin induced by the southward-dipping Cadomian subduction beneath the amalgamated WAC-Iriri/Tazigzaout arc complex at ca. 620 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Errami et al., 2021; Walsh et al., 2012; El Hadi et al., 2010; Abati et al., 2010). The nature of the basement north of the AAMF also remains unresolved (Ennih and Liégeois, 2008, 2001).</p>
      <p id="d2e548">In the Zgounder Mine Region (ZGMR), a well-preserved section of Ediacaran sedimentation and magmatism, provides key insights into the final stages of Pan-African tectono-magmatic evolution along the northern margin of the WAC. Here, we present new whole-rock geochemical, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic data to decipher the petrogenesis of these rocks, explore magma sources, and assess their geodynamic significance in the Ediacaran evolution of the WAC. We also report new LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages from magmatic and detrital zircons to constrain the lower Ediacaran magmatism and evaluate the provenance of the Saghro Group sedimentary units, thereby refining existing geodynamic models.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Geological background</title>
      <p id="d2e583">The Anti-Atlas belt consist of a Proterozoic basement and a late Ediacaran to Paleozoic cover (Leblanc and Lancelot, 1980) (Fig. 1B). It records two major orogenic cycles: the Paleoproterozoic Eburnean and the Neoproterozoic Pan-African, classically separated by the AAMF (Fig. 1B). The Paleoproterozoic Eburnean Orogeny is preserved in the Western Anti-Atlas, where low- to high-grade metamorphic rocks are intruded by granitoids dated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hefferan et al., 2014, and references therein; O'Connor et al., 2010; El Hadi et al., 2010; Gasquet et al., 2008, 2005; Thomas et al., 2002; Walsh et al., 2002; Aït Malek et al., 1998). The Central Anti-Atlas features the ophiolitic sequences and island-arc complexes of the Bou Azzer and Sirwa massifs (Admou et al., 2013; D'Lemos et al., 2006; Thomas et al., 2002, 2004). To the east, the Eastern Anti-Atlas comprises the Jbel Saghro and Ougnat massifs, composed exclusively of Neoproterozoic Pan-African units (Fig. 1B): an early Ediacaran SG basement of folded meta-sedimentary rocks metamorphosed under greenschist facies conditions, unconformably overlain by late Ediacaran OG volcanic and volcano-sedimentary successions (Ouabid and Garrido, 2023; Errami et al., 2021; Yajioui et al., 2020; Michard et al., 2017; Blein et al., 2014a; Álvaro et al., 2014a, b; Walsh et al., 2012; Abati et al., 2010; Errami et al., 2009; Gasquet et al., 2008; Liégeois et al., 2006; Thomas et al., 2002; Fekkak et al., 2001; Bajja, 2001; Ouguir et al., 1996).</p>
      <p id="d2e601">This study focuses on the Ediacaran (630–539 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the Sirwa massif. Recent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 scale mapping of the Douar Çour, Assarrag, Tachoukacht, Tamallakout, Sirwa, Taghdout, and Açdif (see Fig. 1C) subdivided the Sirwa massif into several groups (Thomas et al., 2000; De Beer et al., 2000; Gresse et al., 2000). The oldest units belong to the Bleida Group, comprising schists and orthogneisses dated at 743 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 1C) (Thomas et al., 2002), overlain by the SG (Thomas et al., 2002): a thick deformed succession of calc-alkaline volcanic rocks, and sedimentary units metamorphosed under greenschist-facies conditions. The SG comprises six formations: Tittalt, Agchtim, Imghi, Tizoula, Azarwas, and Tafiat (Thomas et al., 2002), with a lower greywacke/turbidites-volcanic sequence and upper coarse-grained clastic formations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detrital zircon dating indicates a maximum depositional age of ca. 610 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Abati et al., 2010; Liégeois et al., 2006), with more recent ages of 607 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 and 604 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Errami et al., 2021). Within the Sirwa inlier, depositional age of the SG is constrained by the Mzil granite dated at 614 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thomas et al., 2002, 2004).</p>
      <p id="d2e697">The Bou Salda Group, a volcano-sedimentary succession from 610 to 580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gasquet et al., 2008), represents basin infills of grabens and pull-apart basins within the AAMF (Errami et al., 2021; Gasquet et al., 2008; Thomas et al., 2002). The age of the Bou Salda Group is derived from the Tadmant and Tamriwine rhyolites, dated, respectively at 606 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 and 605 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thomas et al., 2002) (Figs 1C and 2). Pelleter et al. (2016), also dated the Tadmant rhyolite at 610 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). Nonetheless, Abati et al. (2010) report ca. 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detrital ages in the Bou Salda Group indicating a coeval volcanogenic input.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e757">Detailed geological map of the ZGMR (this study). Locations of surface samples are indicated on the map. Underground samples (Mine levels, drill holes) including the dated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not represented on the map.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e778">The OG sequences (580–539 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Blein et al., 2014b; Toummite et al., 2013; Thomas et al., 2002, 2004) of immature, coarse clastic sedimentary rocks (conglomerates, arkoses, reworked volcanic rocks), acid to intermediate volcaniclastic rocks (lapilli tuff, volcanic breccias, ignimbrites, etc.), and lavas (minor basalt, andesite and rhyolite) are associated with post-collisional high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calc-alkaline to shoshonitic magmatism (Soulaimani et al., 2018). Throughout the Sirwa inlier, the OG is subdivided into four subgroups: Tiouin, Bouljama, Tafrant, and Achkoukchi (Fig. 1C) (Thomas et al., 2000; Gresse et al., 2000; De Beer et al., 2000). Under an extensional regime, foreland basin successions of the Tata Group were deposited following the post-orogenic molasse volcaniclastic rocks of the OG (Thomas et al., 2002) (Fig. 1C).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Field characteristics and sample distribution</title>
      <p id="d2e802">The study area (Fig. 2), hereafter the ZGMR “Zgounder Mine Region” corresponds to the vicinity of the Zgounder <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit, located 265 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> east of Agadir, and 220 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> west of Ouarzazate, along the southern flank of the Ouzellagh-Sirwa Salient in the Central Anti-Atlas Mountains (Ben-Tami et al., 2024). Detailed geological mapping across the ZGMR established the primary lithostratigraphic relationships (Fig. 2). The Ediacaran of the ZGMR (630–539 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) comprises: (i) the SG sedimentary successions and coeval magmatic rocks deposited 630 to 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Errami et al., 2021; Abati et al., 2010); and (ii) large felsic plutons, subvolcanic formations, and coeval pyroclastic rocks, referred to as the OG (600–539 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Thomas et al., 2002).</p>
      <p id="d2e858">The oldest rocks in the study area belong to the SG: the northern, E–W-striking Tittalt Formation and the southern Imghi Formation (Fig. 2). The lowermost Tittalt Formation consists of basaltic and andesitic volcanic rocks associated with a gabbroic intrusion, bounded to the south by the Imghi Formation. The Imghi Formation features poorly graded, thick-bedded greywacke of stacked fine- to very fine-grained sandstone beds, and greyish-green, well-bedded, graded turbidites striking east and dipping steeply south at 70° (Fig. 2). Felsic magmatism is represented by the E–W-trending Tadmant rhyolite (Bou Salda Group; Thomas et al., 2002), forming the core of the area between the western Askaoun granodiorite and the eastern OG sequences (Fig. 2). Other subvolcanic activities include the E–W-trending rhyolitic dikes and plugs of the Assarrag suite (Thomas et al., 2002). Post-SG, post-Bou Salda magmatism includes the Askaoun granodiorite, intruding the western Imghi Formation, and the syn- to late-Ouarzazate Bou-Tazart granite (Amassine Suite; Thomas et al., 2002). To the east, the sub-horizontal volcano-sedimentary packages of the OG consist of laminated ignimbrites, ignimbritic rhyolites, andesites, and lapilli tuffs containing volcanic glass lenses. Associated mafic activity is recorded by an intermittent, fault-offset dolerite/diabase sill-like body (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface width), parallel to the rhyolite-sediment contact (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p id="d2e876">A total of 32 samples were collected from the Saghro and Ouarzazate groups for petrographic and geochemical analysis. For each sample, lithostratigraphic position, sample type, drill core name and depth, short description and analytical methods applied are reported in Table S1 in the Supplement. Three samples were selected for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geochronology: (i) a laminated, light-pink to brownish rhyolitic dike crosscutting the Tittalt Formation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long, 4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick; Fig. 2); (ii) a fine- to medium-grained, light grey granite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from drill hole ZG-20-21 at 555.30–568.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intruding the Imghi Formation; and (iii) a fine- to medium-grained greenish SG sandstone collected near the Zgounder Mine main entrance for detrital zircon analysis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 2) (Table S2).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Data and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon geochronology</title>
      <p id="d2e980">Sample preparation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon geochronology involved crushing, sieving to 50–250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and weighing (1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the Département de Géologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn Zohr, Maroc. Samples were then shipped to the Geotop Research Center, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Canada. Analytical parameters are detailed in the Supplementary Data 1 file in the Supplement, following Horstwood et al. (2016). Ages of intrusive rocks are reported as weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dates, calculated using the “exclude outliers” function in Isoplot R, and detrital zircon data as concordia dates. LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data are given in Table S2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Whole-rock geochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes</title>
      <p id="d2e1121">Fresh rock samples were collected for whole-rock geochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes from outcrops (surface and underground), as well in various diamond drill holes from the ZGMR. Crushing and powdering were performed at the facilities of the Zgounder Millennium Silver Mining Company (ZMSM). Further analytical procedures are detailed in the Supplementary Data 1 file, and results are shown in Table S3.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Petrography</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>The SG magmatic rocks</title>
      <p id="d2e1159"><list list-type="bullet">
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1164">The SG is mainly represented by fine to medium-grained, dolerite to basaltic-andesite samples. A medium- to coarse-grained, equigranular, dark green gabbroic facies is also present, showing heavily altered pyroxenes and amphiboles (Fig. 3a). The SG mafic volcanics contain fine-grained plagioclase and clinopyroxene phenocrysts dispersed in the groundmass. The dolerite sample (Fig. 3b) has an intergranular texture, with primary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides, clinopyroxene aggregates, and lath-shaped plagioclase. Sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is andesitic in composition (Fig. 3c), with an ophitic texture. Basalt and basaltic-andesite samples show a microlitic to microlitic-porphyritic texture (Fig. 3d).</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1195">Photomicrographs (all in cross-polarized light) of the studied SG and OG rocks. <bold>(a)</bold> Gabbro sample showcasing a medium to coarse-grained locally equigranular texture; <bold>(b)</bold> An intergranular texture for dolerite; <bold>(c)</bold> Andesite showcasing an ophitic texture; <bold>(d)</bold> Microlitic-porphyritic texture for basaltic-andesite; <bold>(e)</bold> Sandstone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibiting millimetre-scale laminations showcasing darker bands enriched in chlorite, with quartz-muscovite lighter laminations; <bold>(f)</bold> Microcrystalline texture for rhyolite with embayed quartz phenocrysts; <bold>(g)</bold> Dolerite exhibiting an intergranular texture; <bold>(h)</bold> Diabase characterized by an intergranular texture with patches of blue chlorite; <bold>(i)</bold> Welded ignimbrite with an eutaxitic texture displaying flow textures with feldspars (sanidine) crystals embedded in a glassy fiamme; <bold>(j)</bold> Quartz diorite with subhedral to anhedral amphiboles and sericitized plagioclase; <bold>(k)</bold> Medium to locally fine-grained granite, with an anhedral to subhedral equigranular texture.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f03.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>The SG sedimentary sample</title>
      <p id="d2e1259"><list list-type="bullet">
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1264">The dated sandstone sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) displays alternating patterns with distinct, well-defined, millimeter-scale laminations controlled by compositional variations. Darker bands are enriched in chlorite, whereas lighter laminae are mainly composed of quartz and muscovite (Fig. 3e).</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>The OG magmatic rocks</title>
      <p id="d2e1289"><list list-type="bullet">
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1294">Rhyolite samples show a microcrystalline, locally glassy texture. Primary mineral assemblages, composed of quartz megacrysts and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">feldspar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altered to albite, are embedded in a devitrified matrix. Secondary alteration minerals include sericite and albite, with some local carbonate veinlets (Fig. 3f). Dolerite samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3g) are fine-grained, exhibiting an intergranular texture. They show equant opaque grains enclosed within primary minerals (plagioclase, pyroxene); plagioclase crystals, locally transformed to albite, are moderately sericitized and locally altered to epidote. A dolerite sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) collected next to the mineralized zone has an intergranular texture in which laths of black, oxidized plagioclase are included in pyroxene crystals (Fig. 3h). Clinopyroxene is mainly replaced by hornblende and actinolite, and partially by pyrite, while the plagioclase crystals are strongly altered and replaced by a mixture of blue chlorite and weak, sparse grains of epidote. Ignimbrite samples show a eutaxitic texture with remarkable fiamme and dense welded volcanic glass, along with locally fluidal cryptocrystalline facies, mainly composed of quartz, opaque minerals, sericitized phenocrysts of plagioclase and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">feldspars</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3i).</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e1360">Granodiorite and quartz-diorite samples are grey to light brown, with a moderate pinkish tint related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">feldspar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alteration, and they show a homogenous, coarse-grained texture. Opaque minerals are enclosed in hornblende, biotite and plagioclase. Sericite and clay minerals replace lath-shaped plagioclase phenocrysts and are associated with chlorite and iron oxides (Fig. 3j). Chlorite replaces biotite, which locally substitutes for hornblende crystals. Granite is medium- to locally fine-grained, distinguished from the granodiorite and quartz-diorite by its white to pink color (Fig. 3k).</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
      <p id="d2e1377">More details regarding the mineralogical compositions of the studied samples for both Saghro and the Ouarzazate groups are given as Table S4.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging and LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon geochronology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Sandstone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e1422">Most zircons from sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (sandstone) are uniformly rounded and fragmented, with some being subhedral and showing rounded borders. They measure ca. 75–200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. They are distinguishable by their low CL signal with some being preferentially zoned (Fig. 4a). A total of 138 analysis were obtained from 93 zircons (rims and cores) from this sample, of which 90 are concordant (Fig. 5A; Supplementary Data 2 file). The dated zircon grains have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents of 13–908 and 9–3462 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios range between 0.03 and 2. For the detrital zircons, we calculated a maximum depositional age (MDA) using the weighted mean of the youngest zircon cluster of three grains with a 98 %–100 % concordance and overlapping in age at 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (YC1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [2+]) (Dickinson and Gehrels, 2009). This yielded a MDA age of 2025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5A-1). Moreover, the ages distribution is dominated by one single population, with one uniform peak at 2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and one zircon recording an age at 3700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5A-2). The significance of the detrital age will be discussed below (see Sect. 5.4.1).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1544">Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of representative zircon grains from the <bold>(a)</bold> SG sandstone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <bold>(b)</bold> OG rhyolite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); and <bold>(c)</bold> OG granite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Black circles indicate analytical spots, with corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages. The reported errors are 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1632"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> weighted mean age of three concordant grains, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concordia, and Kernel Density Estimate (KDE) diagram for <bold>(A)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (sandstone). Along with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concordia diagrams, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> weighted mean ages for <bold>(B)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (rhyolite), and <bold>(C)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (granite). Ages were calculated using Isoplot R 1.0 (Vermeesch, 2018).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Rhyolite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e1771">Zircon grains from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (rhyolite) are transparent with subhedral to euhedral habitus. They measure ca. 100–350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in length. CL images reveal that zircon grains exhibit typical oscillatory zoning with rare and limited dark rim overgrowths (Fig. 4b). Forty analyses were obtained on 28 zircon grains from this sample (Supplementary Data 2 file). The dated zircon grains have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents of 20–556 and 40–833 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios range between 0.3 and 0.7. These data yield a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> weighted mean age of 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is interpreted as the crystallization age of the rhyolite (Fig. 5B).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>4.2.3</label><title>Granite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e1914">Zircon grains from sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (granite) are mostly euhedral to subhedral with some being rounded. They measure ca. 100–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in length. CL images show visible oscillatory zoning with local moderately fractured zircons showing dark overgrowths (Fig. 4c). A hundred and sixty analyses were obtained on a hundred and twenty-two zircon grains from this sample (Supplementary Data 2 file). The dated zircon grains have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents of 12–619 and 39–934 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios range between 0.1 and 1.3, supporting their magmatic origin. Zircon analyses within 95 %–105 % concordance yielded a reliable concordia age of 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). One zircon with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> age of 2156 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (103.5 % concordance) was excluded from the age calculation (Fig. 4c). We also calculated a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> weighted mean age using a broader selection of concordant zircons within error, which gave an equivalent age of 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">160</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5C). As both ages are statistically identical, we interpret the 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the crystallization age for the granite.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Whole-rock geochemical compositions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>4.3.1</label><title>Effects of weathering</title>
      <p id="d2e2145">Given the samples' distribution and geological diversity, the selected samples are organized according to their lithostratigraphic positions (Table S1). Loss on Ignition (LOI) values at 1100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), except for the mafic terms of the SG, which reach approximately 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S3; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). When plotted on the alteration box plot of Hughes (1972) (Fig. 6a), most samples fall within the igneous spectrum, defining a homogenous hydrothermal trend. However, sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deviates, plotting in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-altered zone, reflecting localized potassium enrichment. Conversely, two granite samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">109</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) plot in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-altered field, suggesting sodium metasomatism.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2254"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot of Hughes (1972); <bold>(b)</bold> TAS diagram (after Middlemost, 1994); <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Winchester and Floyd, 1977); <bold>(d)</bold> Plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> molar ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> molar ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Shand, 1943); <bold>(e)</bold> Plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Co</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Hastie et al. (2007); <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>4.3.2</label><title>The SG magmatic rocks</title>
      <p id="d2e2622">The analyzed SG rocks belong to the Tittalt Formation in the study area (Figs. 1C and 2; Thomas et al., 2004, 2002). Geochemically, they define a narrow range of compositions, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents from 48.85 to 52.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 61.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. They contain 1.08–7.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 13.44–15.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.82–3.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 0.47–3.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) vs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram, all samples plot within a sub-alkaline basalt field, except sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which has an andesitic composition (Fig. 6c). Most rocks are metaluminous, except sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is peraluminous (Fig. 6d). The SG rocks also display a calc-alkaline signature (Fig. 6e). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) range from 21.50 to 60.20 (Fig. 6f).</p>
      <p id="d2e2893">The SG samples show total rare earth element (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>REE) contents ranging from 60.94 to 231.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with coherent patterns characterized by a slight enrichments in light rare earth elements (LREEs) and depletion in heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) (Fig. 7a), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios ranging from 1.83 to 6.42 (N denotes normalization to Chondrite). Almost all samples show slight/negligible negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89–0.99) to positive one for gabbro <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.28; Fig. 7a) [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EuN</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SmN</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GdN</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where N denotes normalization to chondrite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents]. On the N-MORB-normalized multi-element diagram (Fig. 7b), the SG rocks show enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs; e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) relative to high field strength elements (HFSEs), with negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies and a prominent positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3114"><bold>(a)</bold> Chondrite-normalized REE diagram of Boynton, (1984) for SG; <bold>(b)</bold> NMORB normalized diagram of Sun and McDonough (1989) for SG; <bold>(c)</bold> Chondrite-normalized REE diagram of Boynton, (1984) for OG; <bold>(d)</bold> Primitive-mantle normalized diagram of Sun and McDonough (1989) for OG.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>4.3.3</label><title>The OG magmatic rocks</title>
      <p id="d2e3142">The studied samples of the OG are composed of both volcanic and plutonic rocks. The felsic volcanic and plutonic samples have high contents of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (61.16–79.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10.83–15.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.1–4.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.06–2.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Co</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1–19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), except for one granite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which has a relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Co</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content of 109 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S3). They also have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values of 6.31–8.97, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 0.14–20.75. The plutonic rocks occupy the granite field, with three distinct granodiorite samples (Fig. 6b). Felsic volcanic rocks are as follows: ignimbrites (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) classify as rhyodacite and dacite, while rhyolites and rhyolitic-ignimbrites plot within the rhyolite field (Fig. 6c). The whole set consists of peraluminous rocks, except for the granodiorite samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which exhibit a metaluminous character (Fig. 6d). They display a high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calc-alkaline to shoshonitic signature (Fig. 6e).</p>
      <p id="d2e3423">Mafic volcanics (dolerite) have moderate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (50.58–51.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13.9–14.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.61–7.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4.56–5.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contents. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios range from 0.26 to 0.73, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sums of 3.58–5.64 (Table S3). They are sub-alkaline basalts (Fig. 6c), with a metaluminous character (Fig. 6d) and a calc-alkaline signature (Fig. 6e). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values range from 37.19 to 40.16 (Fig. 6f).</p>
      <p id="d2e3572">The OG samples show total rare earth element (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>REE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) contents ranging from 93.52 to 646.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the REE diagram (Fig. 7c), all felsic volcanic and plutonic samples show homogeneous patterns, with LREEs enrichment relative to HREEs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios vary between 2.91 and 17.93, except for one rhyolitic sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.89. All samples show pronounced negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34–0.61), except for sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which exhibits a prominent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04). In the multi-element spider diagram, all samples display enrichment in LILEs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cs</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and depletion in HFSEs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative to Primitive Mantle (Fig. 7d). Samples also show prominent negative anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, along with positive anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which lacks a negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (Fig. 7d). For the OG dolerites, chondrite normalized REE patterns (Fig. 7c) show moderate LREE enrichment over HREEs, with less fractionated patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.94–6.22) and a very low/absent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88–0.98). However, they are distinguished by a homogenous pattern with prominent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment and a less significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (Fig. 7d).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3946">Whole rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic compositions for the analyzed SG and OG rocks. TDM Goldstein is the Depleted Mantle Age in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated using the linear model of Goldstein et al. (1984); and is not calculated for samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios greater than 0.145 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Abbreviations: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 SE: Standard Errors (Uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic composition); NA: Not Available.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lithology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Age</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 SE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">TDM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">TDM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">measured</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(Goldstein) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(2stage) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col12"><italic>SG rocks</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gabbro</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">620</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1704</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512762</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.512071</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Andesite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">620</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1351</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512550</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.512002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col12"><italic>OG rocks</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Granodiorite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1220</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512414</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.511959</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Granite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1283</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512381</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.511903</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dolerite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1359</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512390</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.511884</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rhyolite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512693</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.511902</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">117</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rhyolite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.512332</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.000011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.511856</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e4015"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CHUR</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ln</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.654</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the decay constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51315</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: present-day ratio of the Depleted Mantle (DM).<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2137</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: present-day parent/daughter ratio of the DM.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: average parent/daughter ratio assigned to the Continental Crust (CC).Error of initial ratio is calculated from the measurement of error of the isotope ratio, the estimated concentration error and the age error. The decay constant is considered to be a fixed value.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mean-square deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mean-square deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mean-square deviation of age.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Whole-rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope compositions</title>
      <p id="d2e5484"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic data from seven samples spanning the Ediacaran record of the Sirwa massif reveal petrogenetic processes and orogenic evolution of the Anti-Atlas belt (630–539 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) following Bou Azzer-Sirwa ophiolite accretion. Results are listed in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d2e5506">Based on field relationships, an angular unconformity (Errami et al., 2009; Thomas et al., 2002) marks a significant sedimentary/magmatic gap between the 630–600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SG and the overlaying 570–539 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OG (Errami et al., 2021). We used 620 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a reference age for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses of SG samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). They show narrow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) 620 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.512) and positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6. Additionally, the TDM model ages (Fig. 8a) of 1.02 and 0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceed the individual maximum depositional ages of 630–600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the crystallization ages of older to contemporaneous igneous intrusions found elsewhere in the Anti-Atlas belt, which fall within 640–580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (Errami et al., 2021; O'Connor et al., 2010; Liégeois et al., 2006; Gasquet et al., 2005; Mrini, 1993).</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e5659"><bold>(a)</bold> Two-stage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope growth diagram for SG and OG rocks versus Age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). DM, Depleted Mantle evolution lines after Goldstein et al. (1984) and Liew and Hofmann (1988); CHUR, Chondritic Uniform Reservoir. The tick marks on the axes denote two-stage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model ages along the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis and initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis; <bold>(b)</bold> Initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for SG and OG rocks. All samples are compared with selected and available reference rocks from the literature. Calculations and diagrams are produced using GCDkit (Janoušek et al., 2006).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5757">The OG rocks, calculated at 570 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibit a mostly uniform distribution, with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">143</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values from 0.5118 to 0.5119. These ratios are close to, or slightly lower than, the Chondritic Uniform Reservoir (CHUR) values. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">570</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1). Volcanic rocks show negative to near-zero <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">570</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 (Tadmant rhyolite), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0 (OG rhyolite), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 (dolerite). Granitoids have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">570</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. TDM model ages for all samples range from 1.30 to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8a). Overall, the distinct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic signatures for both groups are further supported by the negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8b).</p>
      <p id="d2e5967">Further, to quantify the mixing proportions for the Saghro and Ouarzazate groups, this study employs a binary mixing model based on the equations of Faure (1986), following the computational approach detailed by Janoušek et al. (2016). In this model, the isotopic ratio of a mixture (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as the mean of the isotopic ratios of two end-members (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), weighted by their respective mass fractions and elemental concentrations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the mass fraction of end-member 1 (where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the elemental concentrations of the end-members and the resulting mixture, respectively. Mantle end-member 1 is defined by a metasomatized lithospheric source, with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.512265, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 from Errami et al. (2009), reflecting mantle enrichment by prior subduction processes. For crustal end-member 2, we used parameters from Ennih and Liégeois (2008) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.511472; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16), representing the Paleoproterozoic basement of the WAC.</p>
      <p id="d2e6215">The mixing equations are defined as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M426" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M427" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e6422">Applying this mixing model reveals that SG rocks are characterized by a dominantly mantle origin: the andesite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and gabbro (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) yield high mantle-derived mass fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 88 % and 92 %, respectively, with minor crustal inputs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %–12 %). Conversely, the OG magmas have mantle mass fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranging from 75 % to 85 %. Moreover, the calculated crustal contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases from 15 % in granodiorite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 25 % in rhyolite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">117</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Petrogenesis</title>
      <p id="d2e6542">The SG and OG rocks exhibit chemical evolution consistent with fractional crystallization. General trends for major elements (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) show positive correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9a–c). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents decrease with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggesting plagioclase crystallization (Fig. 9a). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents drop sharply as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40, indicating clinopyroxene or calcic plagioclase fractionation (Fig. 9b). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also decreases with decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pointing to early crystallization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxides (e.g., ilmenite or titanomagnetite) (Fig. 9c).</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e6678"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> molar ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(g)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <bold>(h)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <bold>(i)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Symbols as those in Fig. 6.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7044">On the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot (Fig. 9d), the SG rocks are metaluminous (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0), while the OG felsic and plutonic rocks are peraluminous (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CNK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0). This shift to peraluminous compositions suggests melting of aluminum-rich material or fractionation of aluminum-poor minerals (e.g., hornblende, pyroxene) in the felsic rocks. In Fig. 9e, the SG rocks retain the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating a more aluminum-enriched source or less plagioclase removal. This is supported by the absence of a negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89–1.28), reaching a positive value for gabbro <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">105</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.28), indicating limited plagioclase fractionation (Fig. 7a). In contrast, the OG rocks show a marked <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline from mafic volcanics through plutonics to felsic volcanics, indicating that plagioclase crystallization was the dominant driver of OG differentiation (Fig. 9e). This is corroborated by the prominent negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly in rhyolite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the absence of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly in dolerites suggests limited plagioclase involvement (Fig. 7c).</p>
      <p id="d2e7234">On the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot (Fig. 9f), both the SG rocks and OG mafic volcanics show low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), typical of mantle-derived melts. For the SG, however, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">#</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 21.50 to 60.20 reflect early fractionation of ferromagnesian minerals, indicating the rocks are not derived from a primitive melt. For the OG, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels reach up to 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in felsic volcanics and plutonics, suggesting crustal melting or assimilation during magma ascent (Fig. 9f). The absence of a negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly in the SG rocks (Fig. 7a), despite the evolved nature of the magmas, likely reflects mixing between evolved basaltic magmas and more primitive magmas that lacked plagioclase fractionation. The OG felsic volcanics and plutonics show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion, consistent with plagioclase and apatite fractionation (Fig. 7d).</p>
      <p id="d2e7338"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) show a clear positive correlation (Fig. 9g). Mafic rocks of the Saghro and the Ouarzazate groups have high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values near 1.0, suggesting plagioclase accumulation consistent with their more primitive nature. In contrast, the OG felsic volcanics and plutonics show significantly lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Eu</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, indicating substantial plagioclase fractionation from the melt (Fig. 9g). Whole rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlations are as expected for a fractional crystallization process (Fig. 9h–i). A localized spike in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates late-stage mineralogical control, involving zircon or amphibole fractionation in the more evolved OG, distinct from the relatively stable ratios of most samples (Fig. 9h). This implies that the magmatic evolution of the SG and the OG rocks involved both fractional crystallization and progressive crustal contamination or a subduction-modified source (Fig. 9i).</p>
      <p id="d2e7494">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot clearly distinguishes the SG from the OG rocks (Fig. 10a). The SG rocks show strongly positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6), indicating a juvenile, depleted mantle origin with minimal crustal interaction. In contrast, the OG rocks, by contrast, cluster near or below the CHUR line (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1), reflecting a hybrid source with significant reworking of older continental crust. Sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shares this near-zero isotopic signature, but its unusually high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21) points to a distinct petrogenetic process, likely low degree of partial melting that fractionated REE without significantly altering the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic composition of its source (Fig. 10a).</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e7646">Plots <bold>(a)</bold> Initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">147</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (domains are modified from Labanieh et al. (2012). Legend is the same as in Fig. 8.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7777">The SG and OG also show distinct geochemical fingerprints. For samples with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10b), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios show a wide spread (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–15): OG plutonics decline sharply (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3), indicating advanced fractional crystallization of ferromagnesian and accessory minerals, while SG mafic rocks maintain higher, stable ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–15), consistent with more primitive melts. Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically behave as geochemical twins, they can fractionate during subduction (Hofmann et al., 1986). The OG rocks cluster below a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of 14, well below the mantle value of 17.5 (Sun and McDonough, 1989) and close to the bulk continental crust value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 (Green, 1995), confirming a dominant crustal signature. This is further corroborated by an enrichment in LILEs, coupled with prominent negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies (Fig. 7d), consistent with subduction-related magmatism or recycling of metasomatized lithosphere (Ikenne et al., 2007). Finally, the OG rhyolite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) displays a horizontal shift toward higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9) (Fig. 10b), suggesting magma enrichment via a low degree partial melting from a source already characterized by a low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and a pre-existing subduction-modified signature.</p>
      <p id="d2e7946">The SG and OG rocks show enrichment in LILEs and LREEs relative to HFSEs and HREEs. They also exhibit pronounced negative anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7), suggesting subduction zone fluids influence (Wilson, 1989). For the OG rocks, this inherited geochemical signature is attributed to oceanic arc rocks previously subducted into the mantle (Toummite et al., 2013; Gasquet et al., 2008; Ikenne et al., 2007; Thomas et al., 2002).</p>
      <p id="d2e7973">Trace elements can clarify subduction input versus crustal contamination. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram (Fig. 10c), most samples display low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ba</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high, variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, favoring a dominant role for sediment melting process. A similar sediment melt signature is also observed for all samples in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram (Fig. 10d). For the SG rocks, relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are attributed to plagioclase accumulation. High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios further indicate a sediment-dominated influence, suggesting that slab pressure-temperature conditions were sufficient to trigger sediment melting (Labanieh et al., 2012). This melting process acted as the primary mechanism transferring the slab signature into the analyzed samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes composition and magma source characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e8094">The whole-rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope compositions of the Saghro and Ouarzazate groups suggest a heterogeneous magma source, reflected in the negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8b). The SG maintains high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><sub>(620)</sub>values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6) even as silica increase, reinforcing a juvenile mantle source with minimal crustal input. The corresponding TDM model ages of 1.02 and 0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> further support a depleted mantle source. Within the OG, the decreasing trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">570</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a classic signature of Assimilation-Fractional Crystallization (AFC), whereby the cooling magma evolves toward a felsic composition while incorporating more evolved, negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> continental crust. Notably, TDM model ages clustering around 1.30 to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate that the OG magmas were not purely mantle-derived, but involved significant recycling of much older basement (Mesoproterozoic and/or Paleoproterozoic).</p>
      <p id="d2e8248">The binary mixing model validates these isotopic trends. The SG rocks show a near-pristine mantle signature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 88 %–92 %). However, the increasing crustal contribution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the OG rocks, from 15 % in granodiorite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 25 % in rhyolite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">117</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), confirms a coupling between increasingly felsic compositions and higher crustal input. This 25 % contribution from an ancient Paleoproterozoic source (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16) represents a major contamination event, exerting a significant isotopic pull by shifting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the samples to near zero. Normally, without recycling of this ancient basement, a purely mantle-derived magma at 570 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be expected to show strongly positive values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8. This hybridization is further supported by the TDM model ages of 1.30 to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, proving the significant involvement of the underlying Eburnean WAC basement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Tectonic implications</title>
      <p id="d2e8381">Previously, the SG basin was interpreted as consisting of distal, deep marine sediments equivalent to the platform series of the Tachdamt Group, formed during initial rifting associated with the Rodinia breakup (Thomas et al., 2002). However, recent zircon data from SG sediments in the Sirwa and Saghro inliers suggest deposition occurred following Bou Azzer-Sirwa ophiolite accretion, during the main Pan-African Orogeny (Abati et al., 2010; Errami et al., 2009; Liégeois et al., 2006). Furthermore, the tectonic setting of Ediacaran OG magmatism also remains debated, having been interpreted as: (i) post-collisional, linked to asthenospheric upwelling beneath the WAC during its metacratonic evolution (Gasquet et al., 2008, 2005; Liégeois et al., 2006; Thomas et al., 2002); (ii) subduction related (Walsh et al., 2012; Benziane, 2007; El Baghdadi et al., 2003); or (iii) linked to Iapetus Ocean opening, tied to the Ediacaran Central Iapetus Magmatic Province (CIMP; Youbi et al., 2020). Based on age and chemical similarities, this magmatism is also associated with the Avalonian-Cadomian marginal belt along the northwestern edge of Gondwana, constituting a major magmatic flare-up spanning roughly 590–540 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Letsch et al., 2018; Tahiri et al., 2010; Linnemann et al., 2008).</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e8394"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) plot for SG rocks and OG mafic volcanics (Pearce and Norry, 1979); <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram of Shervais (2022); <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram of Pearce (2008); <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot of Pearce et al. (2021); <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">La</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ternary diagram for the tectonic discrimination of basaltic rocks (Cabanis and Lecolle, 1989); <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ternary diagram for the classification of A1 and A2-type anorogenic granites (Eby, 1992). Abbreviations: Bulk CC: Bulk Continental Crust; GLOSS: Global Subducting Sediment; LCC: Lower Continental Crust; UCC: Upper Continental Crust; EM1/EM2: Enriched Mantle (Type 1 and 2); DMM: Depleted MORB Mantle; HIMU: High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">204</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio) mantle reservoir; OIB: Ocean Island Basalt; SZLM: Subduction Zone-Modified Lithospheric Mantle; CAB: Calc-Alkaline Basalt; IAB: Island Arc Basalt; OPB: Oceanic Plateau Basalt; MORB: Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt; N-MORB: Normal Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt; E-MORB: Enriched Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt; EM: Enriched Mantle; OP MORB: BAB: Back-Arc Basin; CFB: Continental Flood Basalt; CT: Continental Tholeiites; A: Orogenic (compressive) domains (island arc, active margins); B: Late to post-orogenic (compressive to distensive) intra-continent domains; C: Anorogenic (distensive) domains.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/1063/2026/se-17-1063-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e8615">For our samples, multi-elemental discrimination plots (Fig. 11a–f) provide a framework for deciphering the petrogenesis and tectonic transition of Ediacaran magmatic sequences in the Anti-Atlas. First, the SG basalts feature high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, classifying them as within-plate basalts (WPB) (Fig. 11a) and indicating an extensional to transtensional setting. On the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram of Shervais (2022), these samples plot within the Continental Flood Basalts (CFB) field (Fig. 11b). Placed in the regional context of the Anti-Atlas, the geodynamic setting of the SG has been interpreted as an intracontinental rift evolving into either a mature back-arc basin (Errami et al., 2009; Fekkak et al., 2001) or a continental passive margin (Fekkak et al., 2002). This evolution is characterized by a transition from early, sediment-influenced tholeiites to more evolved magmatic suites, rather than a massive subaerial flood province. The calc-alkaline character for the SG mafic rocks (Fig. 6e) reflects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichmentt, typical of subduction-influenced or crustally contaminated suites. This transitional character, exhibiting calc-alkaline affinity (Fig. 6e), yet within-plate (Fig. 11a) and continental tholeiites (Fig. 11e) character is interpreted as an early Ediacaran extensional phase, where advanced lithospheric thinning allowed asthenospheric decompression, triggering large-scale melting of the Sub-Continental Lithospheric Mantle (SCLM). In contrast, the younger OG volcanic and plutonic rocks plot at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5), within the Upper Continental Crust (UCC) and Andean Arc fields, with extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment pointing to a regional thermal regime shift (Fig. 11b). This OG magmatism marks a massive crustal melting event, interpreted as a response to post-collisional lithospheric delamination and possible slab break-off. This process generated highly differentiated magmatic suites with wide variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (Fig. 11b).</p>
      <p id="d2e8707">Furthermore, there is a clear lithospheric distinction between the SG and the OG rocks based on trace element enrichments. The SG mafic rocks follow the MORB-OIB array (Fig. 11c), indicating a magma source akin to enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt (E-MORB). This implies that primary magmas were derived via partial melting of an enriched lithospheric mantle carrying a fossil subduction signature from earlier Cryogenian cycles. Conversely, the younger OG volcanic and plutonic rocks show considerable crustal contamination. Their shift toward higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios reflects input of continental crust, or widespread tapping of a SCLM domain deeply metasomatized by subduction-related sediments (Fig. 11c). The SG rocks' lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios further suggest a more primitive, mantle-dominated source modified by an ancient subduction-preconditioned lithospheric root rather than an active deep-mantle plume head, clustering within the vertical Subduction Zone-Modified Lithospheric Mantle (SZLM) array, near the LCC (Lower Continental Crust) (Fig. 11d).</p>
      <p id="d2e8734">The OG rocks, in contrast, plot within the upper limits of the SZLM array, clustering within the IAB and CAB fields. This geochemical footprint may signify slab break-off, whereby crustal recycling or melting of the thickened lithospheric root was driven directly by the thermal anomaly of the upwelling asthenospheric mantle (Fig. 11d).</p>
      <p id="d2e8737">Ultimately, a coherent geodynamic transition emerges between both Saghro and Ouarzazate groups. On Fig. 11e, the SG mafic rocks cluster within the Continental Tholeiites (CT) field, adjacent to the Back-Arc Basin (BAB) domain. This position, combined with their calc-alkaline signature and within-plate character noted above, supports formation in an extensional continental setting. The proximity to the BAB field suggests that, while the crust was thinning, the magmatism retained a slight transitional character typical of a maturing continental rift or back-arc basin, with a distinct geochemical overprint from a pre-modified lithospheric root. The OG felsic and plutonic samples, meanwhile, plot decisively within the A2-type granite field, supporting a post-collisional origin (Fig. 11f). A2-type granites are considered to originate from partial melting of continental or underplated mafic crust, typically in extensional settings (Eby, 1992). In this context, crustal recycling was likely driven by the mechanical and thermal effects of lithospheric delamination and potential slab failure (Blein et al., 2023; Ougadire et al., 2023). This triggered rapid basin development and accumulation of the thick volcano-sedimentary sequences characteristic the OG, across the already rigid, fractured metacratonic margin of the WAC, providing preferential pathways for the rapid upward migration of deep-sourced magmas (Walsh et al., 2012, and references therein; Ennih and Liégeois, 2001, 2008; Gasquet et al., 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Significance of LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>5.4.1</label><title>The SG detrital age</title>
      <p id="d2e8768">The existence of Paleoproterozoic basement in the Sirwa massif and the northern margin of the WAC remains debated (Ennih and Liégeois, 2008). While traditionally thought to be confined to the Western Anti-Atlas (Choubert, 1963), recent studies suggest Paleoproterozoic rocks may also be present in the Central and Eastern Anti-Atlas and the Western Meseta (Liégeois et al., 2013; Abati et al., 2010; Gasquet et al., 2008; Pereira et al., 2015, and references therein; Blein et al., 2014a). Historically, the WAC's northern boundary was defined by the deformed Tazagzaout migmatites and gneisses in the Bou-Azzer inlier (Leblanc and Lancelot, 1980). However, new <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dating of the Tazagzaout gneisses (752 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; D'Lemos et al., (2006) and the Oumlil granite (741 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; El Hadi et al., 2010), coupled with juvenile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures (D'Lemos et al., 2006), indicates a juvenile, depleted mantle source, not akin to the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Eburnean WAC basement.</p>
      <p id="d2e8830">According to Thomas et al. (2002), the Imghi Formation represents the lower, thick bedded greywacke/turbiditic section of the SG, forming a typical flysch succession interpreted as the primary sedimentary fill of a back-arc basin associated with the Khzama ophiolite Complex. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the alternating patterns (Fig. 3e) suggest fluctuating depositional conditions, specifically changes in hydrodynamic energy and the amount of clay input, consistent with a low-energy, suspension-dominated sedimentation typical of distal turbidites or quiet shallow-marine environment. The calculated MDA of 2025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; MSWD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4; Fig. 5A-1) is similar to ages of syn-to-post-tectonic Eburnean granites in the Central and Western Anti-Atlas (Gasquet et al., 2008, 2005; Aït Malek et al., 1998). The detrital zircon age distribution is further characterized by a prominent population peaking at ca. 2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5A-2), reflecting a dominant provenance from the Eburnean-aged WAC basement (O'Connor et al., 2010; Gasquet et al., 2008, 2005; Thomas et al., 2002). This primary pulse, coupled with a single Paleo-Archean grain at 3700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicates recycling of ancient cratonic material (Fig. 5A-2). Interestingly, no ages younger than 1600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were found in our sample; in particular, 883–640 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pan-African zircons, which are common in outcrops of the Sirwa inlier and consistently reported in SG sediments elsewhere (Letsch et al., 2018; Abati et al., 2010), are absent. The narrow gap between the 2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak and the 2025 MDA suggests that sedimentation occurred in a basin directly overlaid or adjacent to an uplifted, pristine block of Paleoproterozoic Eburnean basement, which acted as the exclusive sediment source without interaction with Ediacaran sediments.</p>
      <p id="d2e8914">The returned age may reflect insufficient sampling of detrital zircons; however, the number of analyzed zircons (up to 138; Table S2) is considered adequate to address paleogeographic questions and sediment source provenance (Vermeesch, 2004). Based on these findings, the WAC crust likely extends beneath the Sirwa massif and continues northward well beyond the Anti-Atlas belt. Notably, Paleoproterozoic rhyolites have also been reported in the Meseta Block, north of the Anti-Atlas, with a magmatic age of 2050.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pereira et al., 2015). These findings do support the presence of WAC Paleoproterozoic crust northward beyond the AAMF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>5.4.2</label><title>Magmatic record on the OG</title>
      <p id="d2e8940">New <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon dating of two magmatic samples (rhyolite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and granite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4), representing the OG in the Sirwa massif, returned ages of 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. These ages are consistent with a lower OG affinity, representing an expression of the Ediacaran magmatism previously described across numerous inliers of the Anti-Atlas belt (Yajioui et al., 2020; Walsh et al., 2012; Gasquet et al., 2005; Thomas et al., 2002).</p>
      <p id="d2e9010">In the ZGMR, similar volcanic activity of this type can be bracketed between 620 and 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pelleter et al., 2016; Thomas et al., 2002; this study). Pelleter et al. (2016) reported a mean age of 578 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for rhyolitic dikes and plugs at the Zgounder Mine, using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">206</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages. In the Sirwa massif, similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages of 579 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7, 571 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8, 577 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, 579 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7, and 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained for the Tourcht diorite, the Tikhfist rhyolite (Tiouin Subgroup, Fig. 1C), the Aguins member (Tafrant Subgroup), the Tilsakht granite, and the Askaoun granodiorite, respectively (Thomas et al., 2002). Given that our rhyolite's age of 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is identical within error to these ages, a rapid sequence of intrusive events had to occur within a few million years.</p>
      <p id="d2e9131">For the granite sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the obtained age of 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also identical within error to the ages of the neighbouring Imourkhssen granite, dated, respectively at 561 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3, 562 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5, and 558 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by Toummite et al. (2013), Thomas et al. (2002), and Ferraq et al. (2024) (Fig. 1C). The Imourkhssen granite intrudes the lower, older part of the OG in the Sirwa massif (Thomas et al., 2002). Additionally, numerous syn- to late-OG granites in the Sirwa massif have similarly yielded ages of ca. 560 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, making them the youngest components of the OG (Thomas et al., 2002). According to Thomas et al. (2002), these granites belong to the Achkoukchi Complex (Fig. 1C) and are grouped into the Amassine Suite (e.g., Bou-Tazart, Aït Nabdas, and Tikitar granites, and the Tazoult Quartz-porphyry at 559 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The inherited age of 2156 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zg</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates a Paleoproterozoic crustal component, supporting reworking of ancient Eburnean basement during OG genesis. This result aligns with significant inherited Paleoproterozoic zircon populations reported for OG rocks across the Anti-Atlas. For instance, Baidada et al. (2019) reported a Paleoproterozoic signature in Saghro massif granitoids, while Blein et al. (2014b) and Thomas et al. (2002) documented similar inheritance in OG ignimbrites from the Agadir Melloul area and syn-extensional granites in the Sirwa massif, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>Further discussions</title>
      <p id="d2e9252">At a regional scale, basaltic flows have been described as interbedded within the SG sediments of the Saghro massif (Errami et al., 2009; Fekkak et al., 2003, 2001). These flows exhibit diverse geochemical signatures. The basalts in Sidi Flah (SF) are of Initial Rift Tholeiites (IRT) and Ocean Island Basalts (OIB) character (Fekkak et al., 2001). In contrast, the Anou N'Izem basalts in the Boumalne (BO) inlier possess typical Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt (MORB) signatures (Errami et al., 2009). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dating of detrital zircons from the SG in various inliers suggests this unit was deposited between 640–600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the entire Central-Eastern Anti-Atlas region (Errami et al., 2021; Abati et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d2e9275">In liaison, this geochemical variation within the SG likely reflects a single, continuous geodynamic event. Specifically, during the evolution of a back-arc basin, the earliest magmas often exhibit magmatic arc-like characteristics due to the proximity of the back-arc to the arc itself; as the back-arc matures and the magma source becomes further removed from the metasomatized mantle, magmas transition toward within-plate (OIB) and MORB-like signatures (Vasey et al., 2021; Saunders and Tarney, 1984). This interpretation is further supported by sediment geochemistry pointing toward a back-arc basin depositional environment (Ouguir et al., 1996). In the Anti-Atlas, this footprint is widely attributed to activation of a sub continental lithospheric mantle source, previously metasomatized during earlier Cryogenian Pan-African subduction, operating in tandem with distal stress fields from the emerging Cadomian orogenic system (Hefferan et al., 2014). As the basin matured and lithospheric extension advanced, the magma source increasingly tapped deeper, uncontaminated asthenospheric reservoirs, driving a compositional transition toward within-plate (OIB) and MORB-like signatures higher up the stratigraphy. Basaltic magmatism in the SG fits this evolutionary framework: the calc-alkaline basalts from the Sirwa inlier (Thomas et al., 2002; this study) represent the initial stages of back-arc formation, recording activation of this strongly metasomatized mantle source, whereas the IRT, OIB, and MORB-type basalts found higher in the stratigraphy indicate a more mature, extensional stage tapping deeper, uncontaminated asthenospheric reservoirs.</p>
      <p id="d2e9279">The thick volcano-sedimentary successions of the OG are dominated by silicic to intermediate high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calc-alkaline to shoshonitic volcanism (Blein et al., 2014b; Toummite et al., 2013; Walsh et al., 2012; Gasquet et al., 2008, 2005; Benziane, 2007; Thomas et al., 2004; El Baghdadi et al., 2003). Based on our findings, and regional correlations with similar magmatism (see Table 1 in Hefferan et al. (2014), for reported precise ages from selected Anti-Atlas inliers), we attribute the OG rocks to a widespread post-collisional event, recognized across numerous inliers of the Anti-Atlas (Yajioui et al., 2020; Karaoui et al., 2015; Linnemann et al., 2014; Toummite et al., 2013; Walsh et al., 2012; Gasquet et al., 2005, 2004; Thomas et al., 2002). For the studied OG rocks, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios suggest that slab break-off induced a thermal pulse supplying heat to melt the Lower Continental Crust (LCC), with variable input from a metasomatized mantle wedge previously primed during an earlier subduction phase. Clustering near and above the Upper Continental Crust (UCC) field further indicates that lithospheric delamination supplied the necessary thermal energy to trigger widespread crustal melting, producing the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and shoshonitic signatures of the OG rocks (Bonin, 2004). This magmatism was coeval with a Silicic Large Igneous Province (SLIP) recognized across the Anti-Atlas (Ousbih et al., 2024, and references therein; Schulte et al., 2022).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e9319">In the light of the above, the following conclusions can be drawn: <list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d2e9324">LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon ages of 575 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 and 564 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the OG reflect post-collisional, syn-orogenic magmatism in the ZGMR, spanning roughly 11 million years. Detrital zircons from the SG reveal a single-population at ca. 2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a MDA of 2025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with no younger Neoproterozoic/Pan-African grains, demonstrating exclusive sediment derivation from an adjacent, uplifted pristine block of Eburnean basement and supporting northward extension of the WAC beyond the AAMF.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d2e9379">Based on geochemical proxies (major and trace elements). The SG magmatic rocks were emplaced during early back-arc basin opening, as indicated by their calc-alkaline affinity, geochemical characteristics, and regional correlations. Their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6) and TDM ages (1.02 and 0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reflect a mixed mantle-crustal origin, combining mostly mantle-derived magma with limited contribution from older crustal material consistent with an underlying Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic crust.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label>
      <p id="d2e9418">The OG high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calc-alkaline to shoshonitic suite evolved mainly through fractional crystallization and crustal contamination. They were deposited in a post-collisional setting and sourced from an enriched continental lithospheric mantle, previously underwent metasomatism by fluids from former Neoproterozoic subduction. Their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">570</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1) and TDM ages (1.30 to 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) imply significant reworking of older, evolved Paleoproterozoic continental crustal during Ediacaran times.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iv.</label>
      <p id="d2e9465">The OG rocks of the ZGMR record lithospheric delamination and potential slab break-off driving post-collisional petrogenesis, linked to the late Neoproterozoic SLIP along the northwestern edge of the WAC.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e9472">Data used in this paper is given in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e9475">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-1063-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-1063-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e9484">ABT: Field work, Sampling and preparation, Thin-sections preparation, Investigation, Data visualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing of original draft, Finalization; SB: Supervision, Resources, Writing - review and editing; JEK: Data visualization, Writing of original draft. Review and editing; JHFLD and MGP: LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data and methodology, writing of original draft, review and editing; MF: Data curation and visualization; BB, MBH and MA: Resources, accommodation, field trips, hosting; MBO: review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e9502">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e9508">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e9514">This research represents a component of the corresponding author's thesis project. The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Zgounder Millenium Silver Mining Company (ZMSM), the Moroccan subsidiary of Aya Gold and Silver (AYA), for their essential financial support for this study, as well as for providing accommodation and logistical assistance. Special appreciation is extended to the Exploration geology team at the Zgounder Mine for their valuable facilitation and support during field operations. Official permission to publish this work was granted by David Lalonde, P. Geo/VP Exploration/Aya Gold and Silver Inc.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e9519">Financial support for Whole-rock analysis, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on zircon, fieldwork and accommodation was guaranteed by the Zgounder Millenium Silver Mining company (ZMSM).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e9550">This paper was edited by Petr Jeřábek and reviewed by Vojtěch Janoušek, Stephen Collett, and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abati, J., Aghzer, A. M., Gerdes, A., and Ennih, N.: Detrital zircon ages of Neoproterozoic sequences of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas belt, Precambrian Res., 181, 115–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.05.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2010.05.018</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Admou, H., Fekkak, A., Razin, P., Egal, E., Youbi, N., Soulaimani, A., Blein, O., Baudin, T., and Chevremont, P.: Carte géologique Maroc (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), feuille d'Aït Ahmane, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique Maroc, no. 533,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Aït Malek, A., Gasquet, D., Bertrand, J. M., and Leterrier, J.: Géochronologie <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sur zircon de granitoïdes éburnéens et panafricains dans les boutonnières protérozoïques d'Igherm, du Kerdous et du Bas Drâa (Anti-Atlas occidental, Maroc), C. R. Acad. Sci. IIA–Earth and Planetary Science, 327, 819–826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(99)80056-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1251-8050(99)80056-1</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Álvaro, J. J., Benziane, F., Thomas, R., Walsh, G. J., and Yazidi, A.: Neoproterozoic–Cambrian stratigraphic framework of the Anti–Atlas and Ouzellagh promontory (High Atlas), Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 98, 19–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.026</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Álvaro, J. J., Pouclet, A., Ezzouhairi, H., Soulaimani, A., Bouougri, E. H., Imaz, A. G., and Fekkak, A.: Early Neoproterozoic rift-related magmatism in the Anti-Atlas margin of the West African craton, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 255, 433–442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2014.10.008</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Baidada, B., Ikenne, M., Barbey, P., Soulaimani, A., Cousens, B., Haissen, F., Ilmen, Said., and Alansari, A.: SHRIMP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon geochronology of the granitoids of the Imiter Inlier: constraints on the Pan-African events in the Saghro massif, Anti-Atlas (Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 150, 799–810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.10.008</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Bajja, A.: Volcanisme syn à post orogénique du Néoprotérozoïque de l'Anti-Atlas: implications pétrogénétiques et géodynamiques, in: Magmatic Evolution of a Neoproterozoic Island-Arc Syn- to Postorogenic Igneous Activity in the Anti-Atlas (Morocco), edited by: de Wall H. and Greiling R. P., Forschunszentrum Jülich Gmbh, 45, 9–228, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ben-Tami, A., Belkacim, S., Baidada, B., El Kabouri, J., Assalmi, M., Bhilisse, M., and Bouabdellah, M.: Lithostratigraphy, Whole-Rock, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Isotopic Data of the Ediacaran Magmatic Rocks from the Zgounder <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Deposit (Siroua Massif, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco), in: International Conference on Mediterranean Geosciences Union, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham,  167–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48758-3_38" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-031-48758-3_38</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Benziane, F.: Lithostratigraphie et évolution géodynamique de l'Anti-Atlas (Maroc) du Paléoprotérozoïque au Néoprotérozoïque: exemples de la boutonnière de Tagragra de Tata et du Jbel Saghro, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Savoie CISM, Chambéry, France, 321 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Blein, O., Baudin, T., Chèvremont, P., Soulaimani, A., Admou, H., Gasquet, P., and Gombert, P.: Geochronological constraints on the polycyclic magmatism in the Bou Azzer-El Graara inlier (Central Anti-Atlas Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 99, 287–306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.021</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Blein, O., Baudin, T., Soulaimani, A., Cocherie, A., Chèvremont, P., Admou, H., and Roger, J.: New geochemical, geochronological and structural constraints on the Ediacaran evolution of the south Sirwa, Agadir-Melloul and Iguerda inliers, Anti-Atlas, Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 98, 47–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.06.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.06.019</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Blein, O., Baudin, T., Chevremont, P., and Gasquet, D.: Petrogenesis of late Ediacaran volcanic rocks of the Kerdous and Tagragra d'Akka inliers (Anti-Atlas Morocco): involvement of slab-failure, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 199, 104831, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104831</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Bonin, B.: Do coeval mafic and felsic magmas in post-collisional to within-plate regimes necessarily imply two contrasting, mantle and crustal, sources? A review, Lithos, 78, 1–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.042</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Boynton, W. V.: Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements: meteorite studies, in: Developments in geochemistry, Elsevier, Vol. 2,  63–114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42148-7.50008-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-444-42148-7.50008-3</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Cabanis, B. and Lecolle, M.: Le diagramme La/10–Y/15–Nb/8: un outil pour la discrimination des séries volcaniques et la mise en évidence des processus de mélange et/ou de contamination crustale, C. R. Acad. Sci. Série II, 309, 2023–2029, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Choubert, G.: Essai de mise au point du problème des “ignimbrites”, Bulletin Volcanologique, 25, 123–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02596545</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>De Beer, C. H., Chevallier, L. P., De Kock, G. S., Gresse, P. G., and Thomas, R. J.: Notice Explicative de la Carte Géologique du Maroc au <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> feuille Sirwa, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique, Maroc, 395, 86,  2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dickinson, W. R. and Gehrels, G. E.: Use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages of detrital zircons to infer maximum depositional ages of strata: a test against a Colorado Plateau Mesozoic database, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 288, 115–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.013</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>D'Lemos, R. S., Inglis, J. D., and Samson, S. D.: A newly discovered orogenic event in Morocco: Neoproterozoic ages for supposed Eburnean basement of the Bou Azzer inlier, Anti-Atlas Mountains. Precambrian Res., 147, 65–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2006.02.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Eby, G. N.: Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids: petrogenetic and tectonic implications, Geology, 20, 641–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020&lt;0641:CSOTAT&gt;2.3.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020&lt;0641:CSOTAT&gt;2.3.CO;2</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>El Baghdadi, M., El Boukhari, A., Jouider, A., Benyoucef, A., and Nadem, S.: Calc-alkaline arc I-type granitoid associated with S-type granite in the Pan-African belt of eastern Anti-Atlas (Saghro and Ougnat, South Morocco), Gondwana Res., 6, 557–572, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)71007-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1342-937X(05)71007-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>El Hadi, H., Simancas, J. F., Martínez-Poyatos, D., Azor, A., Tahiri, A., Montero, P., Fanning, C. M., Bea, F., and Gonzalez-Lodeiro, F.: Structural and geochronological constraints on the evolution of the Bou Azzer Neoproterozoic ophiolite (Anti-Atlas, Morocco), Precambrian Res., 182, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.011</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Ennih, N. and Liégeois, J. P.: The Moroccan Anti-Atlas: the West African craton passive margin with limited Pan-African activity. Implications for the northern limit of the craton, Precambrian Res., 112, 289–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00195-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00195-4</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ennih, N. and Liégeois, J. P.: The boundaries of the West African craton, with special reference to the basement of the Moroccan metacratonic Anti-Atlas belt, Geol. Soc. Sp., 297, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP297.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP297.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Errami, E., Bonin, B., Laduron, D., and Lasri, L.: Petrology and geodynamic significance of the post-collisional Pan-African magmatism in the Eastern Saghro area (Anti-Atlas, Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 55), 105–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.02.006</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Errami, E., Linnemann, U., Hofmann, M., G¨artner, A., Zieger, J., G¨artner, J., Mende, K., El Kabouri, J., Gasquet, D., and Ennih, N.: From Pan-African transpression to Cadomian transtension at the west African margin: New <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon ages from the eastern saghro inlier (anti-atlas, Morocco), Geol. Soc. Sp., 503, 209–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP503-2020-105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP503-2020-105</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Faure, G.: Isotope systematics in two-component mixtures, Principles of isotope geology, 2 edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Chichester, 141–153,  1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Fekkak, A., Pouclet, A., Ouguir, H., Ouazzani, H., Badra, L., and Gasquet, D.: Géochimie et signification géotectonique des volcanites du Cryogénien inférieur du Saghro (Anti-Atlas oriental, Maroc) /Geochemistry and geotectonic significance of Early Cryogenian volcanics of Saghro (Eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco), Geodin. Acta, 14, 373–385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.10510730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/09853111.2001.10510730</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Fekkak, A., Pouclet, A., and Badra, L.: The pre-Pan-African rifting of Saghro (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): example of the middle Neoproterozoic basin of Boumalne, B. Soc. Geol. Fr., 173, 25–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/173.1.25" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/173.1.25</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Fekkak, A., Pouclet, A., and Benharref, M.: The middle Neoproterozoic sidi flah group (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): syn-rift deposition in a Pan-African continent/ocean transition zone, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 37, 73–87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00049-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00049-6</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Ferraq, M., Belkacim, S., Cheng, L. Z., Davies, J. H., Perrot, M. G., Ben-Tami, A., and Bouabdellah, M.: New Geochemical and Geochronological Constraints on the Genesis of the Imourkhssen <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Au</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Porphyry Deposit (Ouzellagh-Siroua Salient, Anti-Atlas, Morocco): Geodynamic and Metallogenic Implications, Minerals, 14, 832, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080832" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/min14080832</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Gasquet, D., Chevremont, P., Baudin, T., Chalot-Prat, F., Guerrot, C., Cocherie, A., and Cheilletz, A.: Polycyclic magmatism in the tagragra d'akka and kerdous–tafeltast inliers (western Anti-Atlas, Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 39, 267–275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.062</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gasquet, D., Levresse, G., Cheilletz, A., Azizi-Samir, M. R., and Mouttaqi, A.: Contribution to a geodynamic reconstruction of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco) during Pan-African times with the emphasis on inversion tectonics and metallogenic activity at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition. Precambrian Res., 140, 157–182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2005.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2005.06.009</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gasquet, D., Ennih, N., Liégeois, J. P., Soulaimani, A., and Michard, A.: The Pan-African Belt, in: Continental evolution: the geology of Morocco, edited by: Michard, A., Saddiqi, O., Chalouan, A., Frizon de Lamotte, D., Lect. Notes Earth Sci. 116, 33–64, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77076-3_2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-77076-3_2</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Goldstein, S. L., O'nions, R. K., and Hamilton, P. J.: A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sm</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic study of atmospheric dusts and particulates from major river systems, Earth Planet. Sc Lett., 70, 221–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(84)90007-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(84)90007-4</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Green, T. H.: Significance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ta</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust-mantle system, Chem. Geol., 120, 347–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00145-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-2541(94)00145-X</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Gresse, P. G., De Beer, C. H., Chevallier, L. P., De Kock, G. S., and Thomas, R. J.: Notice Explicative de la Carte Géologique du Maroc au <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> feuille Tachoukacht, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique. Maroc, 393, 106, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hastie, A. R., Kerr, A. C., Pearce, J. A., and Mitchell, S. F.: Classification of altered volcanic island arc rocks using immobile trace elements: development of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Co</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> discrimination diagram, J. Petrol., 48, 2341–2357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egm062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/petrology/egm062</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hefferan, K., Soulaimani, A., Samson, S. D., Admou, H., Inglis, J., Saquaque, A., and Heywood, N.: A reconsideration of Pan African orogenic cycle in the Anti-Atlas Mountains, Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 98, 34–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.03.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Hofmann, A. W., Jochum, K. P., Seufert, M., and White, W. M.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in oceanic basalts: new constraints on mantle evolution, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 79, 33–45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90038-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-821X(86)90038-5</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Horstwood, M. S., Ko<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">ˇ</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>ler, J., Gehrels, G., Jackson, S. E., McLean, N. M., Paton, C., and Schoene, B.: Community-derived standards for LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geochronology–Uncertainty propagation, age interpretation and data reporting, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 40, 311–332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2016.00379.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1751-908X.2016.00379.x</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hughes, C. J.: Spilites, keratophyres, and the igneous spectrum, Geol. Mag., 109, 513–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800042795" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0016756800042795</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Ikenne, M., Ennaciri, A., Ouguir, H., Cousens, B., Ziyadi, R., Mouhagir, M., and El-Gaouzi, A.: Geochemical Signature And Geodynamic Significance Of An <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mineralized Dyke Swarm In The Neoproterozoic Inlier Of Imiter – Anti-Atlas (Morocco), Ofioliti, 32, 109–118, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Janoušek, V., Farrow, C. M., and Erban, V.: Interpretation of whole-rock geochemical data in igneous geochemistry: introducing Geochemical Data Toolkit (GCDkit), J. Petrol., 47, 1255–1259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egl013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/petrology/egl013</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Janoušek, V., Moyen, J. F., Martin, H., Erban, V., and Farrow, C.: Geochemical modelling of igneous processes: principles and recipes in R language. Bringing the Power of R to a Geochemical Community, Springer, Berlin, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46792-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-662-46792-3</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Karaoui, B., Breitkreuz, C., Mahmoudi, A., Youbi, N., Hofmann, M., Gärtner, A., and Linnemann, U.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon ages from volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Ediacaran Bas Draâ inlier (Anti-Atlas Morocco): Chronostratigraphic and provenance implications, Precambrian Res., 263, 43–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2015.03.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Labanieh, S.; Chauvel, C.; Germa, A.; and Quidelleur, X.: Martinique: a Clear Case for Sediment Melting and Slab Dehydration as a Function of Distance to the Trench. J. Petrol., 53, 2441–2464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egs055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/petrology/egs055</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Leblanc, M. and Lancelot, J. R.: Interprétation géodynamique du domaine pan-africain (Précambrien terminal) de l'Anti-Atlas (Maroc) à partir de données géologiques et géochronologiques, Can. J. Earth Sci., 17, 142–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/e80-012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/e80-012</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Letsch, D., Houicha, M. E., von Quadt, A., and Winkler, W.: missing link in the peri-Gondwanan terrane collage: the Precambrian basement of the Moroccan Meseta and its lower Paleozoic cover, Can. J. Earth Sci., 55, 33–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2017-0086" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/cjes-2017-0086</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Liégeois, J. P., Abdelsalam, M. G., Ennih, N., and Ouabadi, A.: Metacraton: nature, genesis and behavior, Gondwana Res., 23, 220–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Liégeois, J. P., Fekkak, A., Bruguier, O., Errami, E., and Ennih, N.: The Lower Ediacaran (630–610 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Saghro group: an orogenic transgressive basin development during the early metacratonic evolution of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco), in: IGCP485 4th meeting, Algiers, p. 57, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Liew, T. C. and Hofmann, A. W.: Precambrian crustal components, plutonic associations, plate environment of the Hercynian Fold Belt of central Europe: indications from a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic study, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 98, 129–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00402106</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Linnemann, U., Pereira, F., Jeffries, T. E., Drost, K., and Gerdes, A.: The Cadomian Orogeny and the opening of the Rheic Ocean: the diacrony of geotectonic processes constrained by LA-ICP-MS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon dating (Ossa-Morena and Saxo-Thuringian Zones, Iberian and Bohemian Massifs), Tectonophysics, 461, 21–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.002</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Linnemann, U., Gerdes, A., Hofmann, M., and Marko, L.: The Cadomian Orogen: Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian crustal growth and orogenic zoning along the periphery of the West African Craton-Constraints from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon ages and Hf isotopes (Schwarzburg Antiform, Germany), Precambrian Res., 244, 236–278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.08.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2013.08.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Michard, A., Soulaimani, A., Ouanaimi, H., Raddi, Y., Brahim, L. A., Rjimati, E. C., and Saddiqi, O.: Saghro Group in the Ougnat Massif (Morocco), an evidence for a continuous Cadomian basin along the northern West African Craton, Comptes Rendus Géosciences, 349, 81–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2017.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.crte.2017.01.001</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Middlemost, E. A.: Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system, Earth-Sci. Rev., 37, 215–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Mrini, Z.: Chronologie (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Rb</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), traçage isotopique (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) des sources de roches magmatiques éburnéenne, panafricaine et hercynienne du Maroc, thesis, University of Marrakech, Morocco, 200 p., 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Nance, R. D., Murphy, J. B., Strachan, R. A., Keppie, J. D., Gutiérrez-Alonso, G., Fernández-Suárez, J., and Pisarevsky, S. A.: Neoproterozoic–early Palaeozoic tectonostratigraphy and palaeogeography of the peri-Gondwanan terranes: Amazonian v. West African connections, Geol. Soc. Sp., 297, 345–383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP297.17" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP297.17</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> O'Connor, E. A., Barnes, R. P., Beddoe-Stephens, B., Fletcher, T., Gillespie, M. R., Hawkins, M. P., Loughlin, S. C., Smith, M., Smith, R. A., Waters, C. N., and Williams, M.: Geology of the Drâa, Kerdous, and Boumalne Districts, Anti-Atlas, Nottingham British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Morocco, p. 324, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Ouabid, M. and Garrido, C. J.: Widespread Cadomian–Pan-African Ediacaran magmatism across the Moroccan Meseta: implication for the geodynamic evolution of the NW Gondwana margin, Precambrian Res., 387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2023.106992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2023.106992</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Ougadire, M., Askkour, F., Favier, A., Ousbih, M., Ikenne, M., and Géraud, Y.: Petrogenesis of the late Ediacaran A-type granites of the western part of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas belt: Insights from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dating, geochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes of the Sidi El Houssein, Tafraout and Taourgha intrusions, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 203, 104947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104947" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104947</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Ouguir, H., Macaudière, J., and Dagallier, G.: Le Protérozoïque supérieur d'Imiter, Saghro oriental, Maroc : un contexte géodynamique d'arrière-arc, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 22 (2), 173–189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(96)00002-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0899-5362(96)00002-4</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Ousbih, M., Ikenne, M., Cousens, B., Chelle-Michou, C., El Bilali, H., Gaouzi, A., and Ernst, R.: Stratigraphy, geochronology, geochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes of the Ouarzazate Group, Anti-Atlas, Morocco: Evidence of a Late Neoproterozoic LIP in the northwestern part of the West African Craton, Lithos, 474, 107593., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107593</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Pearce, J. A.: Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust, Lithos, 100, 14–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Pearce, J. A. and Norry, M. J.: Petrogenetic implications of Ti, Zr, Y, and Nb variations in volcanic rocks. Contributions to mineralogy and petrology, 69, 33–47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00375192</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Pearce, J. A., Ernst, R. E., Peate, D. W., and Rogers, C.: LIP printing: use of immobile element proxies to characterize Large Igneous Provinces in the geologic record, Lithos, 392–393, 106068, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106068</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Pelleter, E., Cheilletz, A., Gasquet, D., Mouttaqi, A., Annich, M., Camus, Q., Deloule, E., Ouazzani, L., Bounajma, and H., Ouchtouban, L.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages of magmatism in the Zgounder Epithermal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Deposit, Sirwa Window, Anti-Atlas, Morocco, in: Mineral Deposits of North Africa, Springer, 143–165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31733-5_5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-31733-5_5</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Pereira, M. F., El Houicha, M., Chichorro, M., Armstrong, R., Jouhari, A., El Attari, A., and Silva, J. B.: Evidence of a Paleoproterozoic basement in the Moroccan Variscan belt (Rehamna massif, western Meseta), Precambrian Res., 268, 61–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.07.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2015.07.010</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Rojo-Pérez, E., Arenas, R., Fuenlabrada, J. M., Novo-Fernández, I., Martínez, S. S., Moreno-Martín, D., and Fernández, R. D.: Lower Cambrian magmatism in the SW Iberian sector of the African–Gondwana margin: geochemical and isotopic keys to incipient tectonic switching, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP542-2022-294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP542-2022-294</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> Saadi, A.: Contribution à l'étude écologique de deux hydrosystèmes temporaires saumâtres du Maroc: Zima et Sedd-El-Messjoun (Bassin de la Bahira), PhD thesis, Semlalia Faculty, University of Cady Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Samson, S. D., Inglis, J. D., D'Lemos, R. S., Admou, H., Blichert-Toft, J., and Hefferan, K.: Geochronological, geochemical, and Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on the origin of Neoproterozoic plagiogranites in the Tasriwine ophiolite, Anti-Atlas orogen, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 135, 133–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2004.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.precamres.2004.08.003</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Saunders, A. D. and Tarney, J.: Geochemical characteristics of basaltic volcanism within back-arc basins, Geol. Soc. Sp., 16, 59–76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.016.01.05" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.016.01.05</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Schulte, B., Boger, S. D., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., and Fanning, C. M.: The Ouarzazate Supergroup and its plutonic keel: the relics of an Ediacaran silicic large igneous province in North Africa, J. Geol. Soc. London, 179, 5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/jgs2021-114</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Shand, S. J.: Eruptive Rocks: Their Genesis, Composition, Classification, and Their Relation to Ore Deposits with a Chapter on Meteorites. John Wiley and Sons, New York, No. 552.1 S43, 1943.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Shervais, J. W.: The petrogenesis of modern and ophiolitic lavas reconsidered: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Nb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geosci. Front., 13, 101319, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101319</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Soulaimani, A., Ouanaimi, H., Saddiqi, O., Baidder, L., and Michard, A.: The Anti-Atlas Pan-African Belt (Morocco): Overview and pending questions, Comptes Rendus Géoscience, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.crte.2018.07.002</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Stern, R. J.: A reinterpretation of the past 2.5 billion years of Earth's tectonic history: Two episodes each of plate and single-lid tectonics, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/B37966.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/B37966.1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Sun, S. S. and McDonough, W. F.: Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes, Geol. Soc. Sp., 42, 313–345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Tahiri, A., Montero, P., El Hadi, H., Poyatos, D. M., Azor, A., Bea, F., and Lodeiro, F. G.: Geochronological data on the Rabat–Tiflet granitoids: their bearing on the tectonics of the Moroccan Variscides, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 57, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.07.005</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, R. J., Chevallier, L. P., Gresse, P. G., Harmer, R. E., Eglington, B. M., Armstrong, R. A., De Beer, C. H., Martini, J. E. J., De Kock, G. S., Macey, P. H., and Ingram, B. A.: Precambrian evolution of the Sirwa window, Anti-Atlas orogen, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 118, 1–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00075-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00075-X</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, R. J., De Beer, C. H., Chevallier, L. P., De Kock, G. S., and Gresse, P. G.: Notice Explicative de la Carte Géologique du Maroc au <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> feuille Assarag, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique, Maroc, 392, 84, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, R. J., Fekkak, A., Ennih, N., Errami, E., Loughlin, S. C., Gresse, P. G., and Liégeois, J.-P.: A new lithostratigraphic framework for the Anti-Atlas Orogen, Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 39, 217–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.046</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Toummite, A., Liégeois, J. P., Gasquet, D., Bruguier, O., Beraaouz, E. H., and Ikenne, M.: Field, geochemistry and Sr-Nd isotopes of the Pan-African granitoids from the Tifnoute Valley (Sirwa, Anti-Atlas, Morocco): a post-collisional event in a metacratonic setting, Miner. Petrol., 107, 739–763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-012-0245-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00710-012-0245-3</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Vasey, D. A., Cowgill, E., and Cooper, K. M.: A preliminary framework for magmatism in modern continental back-arc basins and its application to the Triassic-Jurassic tectonic evolution of the Caucasus, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 22, e2020GC009490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GC009490</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: How many grains are needed for a provenance study?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 224, 441–451, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.037</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Vermeesch, P.: IsoplotR: A Free and Open Toolbox for Geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Walsh, G. J., Aleinikoff, J. N., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., and Armstrong, T. R.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic Tagragra de Tata inlier and its Neoproterozoic cover, western Anti-Atlas, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 117 , 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00044-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00044-X</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Walsh, G. J., Aleinikoff, J. N., Harrison, R. W., Yazidi, A., Burton, W. C., Quick, J. E., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., and Saadane, A.: Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Jebel Saghro and Bou Azzer—El Graara inliers, eastern and central Anti-Atlas, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 216, 23–62, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j</ext-link>. precamres.2012.06.010, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Wilson, M.: Igneous Petrogenesis: A Global Tectonic Approach, Unwin Hyman, London, 466 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6788-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4020-6788-4</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Winchester, J. A. and Floyd, P. A.: Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements, Chem. Geol., 20, 325–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Yajioui, Z., Karaoui, B., Chew, D., Breitkreuz, C., and Mahmoudi, A.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zircon geochronology of the Ediacaran volcano-sedimentary succession of the NE Saghro inlier (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): chronostratigraphic correlation on the northwestern margin of Gondwana, Gondwana Res., 87, 263–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j</ext-link>. gr.2020.06.015, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Youbi, N., Ernst, R. E., Soderlund, U., Boumehdi, M. A., Ait Lahna, A., Tassinari, C. C. G., El Moume, W., and Bensalah, M. K.: The Central Iapetus magmatic province: an updated review and link with the ca. 580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ma</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gaskiers glaciation, in: Mass Extinctions, Volcanism, and Impacts: New Developments, edited by: Adatte, T., Bond, D. P. G., and Keller, G., Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 544, 35–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2020.2544(02)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/2020.2544(02)</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Petrogenesis and geodynamic setting of Ediacaran rocks from the Sirwa massif, Central Anti-Atlas of Morocco</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abati, J., Aghzer, A. M., Gerdes, A., and Ennih, N.:
Detrital zircon ages of Neoproterozoic sequences of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas belt, Precambrian Res., 181, 115–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.05.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.05.018</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Admou, H., Fekkak, A., Razin, P., Egal, E., Youbi, N., Soulaimani, A., Blein, O., Baudin, T., and Chevremont, P.:
Carte géologique Maroc (1∕50 000), feuille d'Aït Ahmane, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique Maroc, no. 533,  2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aït Malek, A., Gasquet, D., Bertrand, J. M., and Leterrier, J.:
Géochronologie U-Pb sur zircon de granitoïdes éburnéens et panafricains dans les boutonnières protérozoïques d'Igherm, du Kerdous et du Bas Drâa (Anti-Atlas occidental, Maroc), C. R. Acad. Sci. IIA–Earth and Planetary Science, 327, 819–826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(99)80056-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(99)80056-1</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Álvaro, J. J., Benziane, F., Thomas, R., Walsh, G. J., and Yazidi, A.:
Neoproterozoic–Cambrian stratigraphic framework of the Anti–Atlas and Ouzellagh promontory (High Atlas), Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 98, 19–33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.026</a>, 2014a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Álvaro, J. J., Pouclet, A., Ezzouhairi, H., Soulaimani, A., Bouougri, E. H., Imaz, A. G., and Fekkak, A.:
Early Neoproterozoic rift-related magmatism in the Anti-Atlas margin of the West African craton, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 255, 433–442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.10.008</a>, 2014b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baidada, B., Ikenne, M., Barbey, P., Soulaimani, A., Cousens, B., Haissen, F., Ilmen, Said., and Alansari, A.:
SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of the granitoids of the Imiter Inlier: constraints on the Pan-African events in the Saghro massif, Anti-Atlas (Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 150, 799–810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.10.008</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bajja, A.:
Volcanisme syn à post orogénique du Néoprotérozoïque de l'Anti-Atlas: implications pétrogénétiques et géodynamiques, in: Magmatic Evolution of a Neoproterozoic Island-Arc Syn- to Postorogenic Igneous Activity in the Anti-Atlas (Morocco), edited by: de Wall H. and Greiling R. P., Forschunszentrum Jülich Gmbh, 45, 9–228, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ben-Tami, A., Belkacim, S., Baidada, B., El Kabouri, J., Assalmi, M., Bhilisse, M., and Bouabdellah, M.:
Lithostratigraphy, Whole-Rock, and Sm–Nd Isotopic Data of the Ediacaran Magmatic Rocks from the Zgounder Ag–Hg Deposit (Siroua Massif, Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco), in: International Conference on Mediterranean Geosciences Union, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham,  167–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48758-3_38" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48758-3_38</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benziane, F.:
Lithostratigraphie et évolution géodynamique de l'Anti-Atlas (Maroc) du Paléoprotérozoïque au Néoprotérozoïque: exemples de la boutonnière de Tagragra de Tata et du Jbel Saghro, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Savoie CISM, Chambéry, France, 321 pp., 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blein, O., Baudin, T., Chèvremont, P., Soulaimani, A., Admou, H., Gasquet, P., and Gombert, P.:
Geochronological constraints on the polycyclic magmatism in the Bou Azzer-El Graara inlier (Central Anti-Atlas Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 99, 287–306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.04.021</a>, 2014a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blein, O., Baudin, T., Soulaimani, A., Cocherie, A., Chèvremont, P., Admou, H., and Roger, J.:
New geochemical, geochronological and structural constraints on the Ediacaran evolution of the south Sirwa, Agadir-Melloul and Iguerda inliers, Anti-Atlas, Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 98, 47–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.06.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.06.019</a>, 2014b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blein, O., Baudin, T., Chevremont, P., and Gasquet, D.:
Petrogenesis of late Ediacaran volcanic rocks of the Kerdous and Tagragra d'Akka inliers (Anti-Atlas Morocco): involvement of slab-failure, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 199, 104831, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104831" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104831</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bonin, B.:
Do coeval mafic and felsic magmas in post-collisional to within-plate regimes necessarily imply two contrasting, mantle and crustal, sources? A review, Lithos, 78, 1–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.042</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boynton, W. V.:
Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements: meteorite studies, in: Developments in geochemistry, Elsevier, Vol. 2,  63–114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42148-7.50008-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42148-7.50008-3</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cabanis, B. and Lecolle, M.:
Le diagramme La/10–Y/15–Nb/8: un outil pour la discrimination des séries volcaniques et la mise en évidence des processus de mélange et/ou de contamination crustale, C. R. Acad. Sci. Série II, 309, 2023–2029, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Choubert, G.:
Essai de mise au point du problème des “ignimbrites”, Bulletin Volcanologique, 25, 123–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596545</a>, 1963.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Beer, C. H., Chevallier, L. P., De Kock, G. S., Gresse, P. G., and Thomas, R. J.:
Notice Explicative de la Carte Géologique du Maroc au 1∕50 000 feuille Sirwa, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique, Maroc, 395, 86,  2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dickinson, W. R. and Gehrels, G. E.:
Use of U–Pb ages of detrital zircons to infer maximum depositional ages of strata: a test against a Colorado Plateau Mesozoic database, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 288, 115–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.013</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
D'Lemos, R. S., Inglis, J. D., and Samson, S. D.:
A newly discovered orogenic event in Morocco: Neoproterozoic ages for supposed Eburnean basement of the Bou Azzer inlier, Anti-Atlas Mountains. Precambrian Res., 147, 65–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.02.003</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eby, G. N.:
Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids: petrogenetic and tectonic implications, Geology, 20, 641–644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020&lt;0641:CSOTAT&gt;2.3.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020&lt;0641:CSOTAT&gt;2.3.CO;2</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
El Baghdadi, M., El Boukhari, A., Jouider, A., Benyoucef, A., and Nadem, S.:
Calc-alkaline arc I-type granitoid associated with S-type granite in the Pan-African belt of eastern Anti-Atlas (Saghro and Ougnat, South Morocco), Gondwana Res., 6, 557–572, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)71007-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)71007-8</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
El Hadi, H., Simancas, J. F., Martínez-Poyatos, D., Azor, A., Tahiri, A., Montero, P., Fanning, C. M., Bea, F., and Gonzalez-Lodeiro, F.:
Structural and geochronological constraints on the evolution of the Bou Azzer Neoproterozoic ophiolite (Anti-Atlas, Morocco), Precambrian Res., 182, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.011</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ennih, N. and Liégeois, J. P.:
The Moroccan Anti-Atlas: the West African craton passive margin with limited Pan-African activity. Implications for the northern limit of the craton, Precambrian Res., 112, 289–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00195-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00195-4</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ennih, N. and Liégeois, J. P.:
The boundaries of the West African craton, with special reference to the basement of the Moroccan metacratonic Anti-Atlas belt, Geol. Soc. Sp., 297, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP297.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP297.1</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Errami, E., Bonin, B., Laduron, D., and Lasri, L.:
Petrology and geodynamic significance of the post-collisional Pan-African magmatism in the Eastern Saghro area (Anti-Atlas, Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 55), 105–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.02.006</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Errami, E., Linnemann, U., Hofmann, M., G¨artner, A., Zieger, J., G¨artner, J., Mende, K., El Kabouri, J., Gasquet, D., and Ennih, N.:
From Pan-African transpression to Cadomian transtension at the west African margin: New U-Pb zircon ages from the eastern saghro inlier (anti-atlas, Morocco), Geol. Soc. Sp., 503, 209–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP503-2020-105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP503-2020-105</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Faure, G.:
Isotope systematics in two-component mixtures, Principles of isotope geology, 2 edn., John Wiley &amp; Sons, Chichester, 141–153,  1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fekkak, A., Pouclet, A., Ouguir, H., Ouazzani, H., Badra, L., and Gasquet, D.:
Géochimie et signification géotectonique des volcanites du Cryogénien inférieur du Saghro (Anti-Atlas oriental, Maroc) /Geochemistry and geotectonic significance of Early Cryogenian volcanics of Saghro (Eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco), Geodin. Acta, 14, 373–385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.10510730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.10510730</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fekkak, A., Pouclet, A., and Badra, L.:
The pre-Pan-African rifting of Saghro (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): example of the middle Neoproterozoic basin of Boumalne, B. Soc. Geol. Fr., 173, 25–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/173.1.25" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/173.1.25</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fekkak, A., Pouclet, A., and Benharref, M.:
The middle Neoproterozoic sidi flah group (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): syn-rift deposition in a Pan-African continent/ocean transition zone, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 37, 73–87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00049-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00049-6</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferraq, M., Belkacim, S., Cheng, L. Z., Davies, J. H., Perrot, M. G., Ben-Tami, A., and Bouabdellah, M.:
New Geochemical and Geochronological Constraints on the Genesis of the Imourkhssen Cu&thinsp;+&thinsp;Mo&thinsp;+&thinsp;Au&thinsp;+&thinsp;Ag Porphyry Deposit (Ouzellagh-Siroua Salient, Anti-Atlas, Morocco): Geodynamic and Metallogenic Implications, Minerals, 14, 832, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080832" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080832</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasquet, D., Chevremont, P., Baudin, T., Chalot-Prat, F., Guerrot, C., Cocherie, A., and Cheilletz, A.:
Polycyclic magmatism in the tagragra d'akka and kerdous–tafeltast inliers (western Anti-Atlas, Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci., 39, 267–275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.062</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasquet, D., Levresse, G., Cheilletz, A., Azizi-Samir, M. R., and Mouttaqi, A.:
Contribution to a geodynamic reconstruction of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco) during Pan-African times with the emphasis on inversion tectonics and metallogenic activity at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition. Precambrian Res., 140, 157–182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2005.06.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2005.06.009</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gasquet, D., Ennih, N., Liégeois, J. P., Soulaimani, A., and Michard, A.:
The Pan-African Belt, in: Continental evolution: the geology of Morocco, edited by: Michard, A., Saddiqi, O., Chalouan, A., Frizon de Lamotte, D., Lect. Notes Earth Sci. 116, 33–64, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77076-3_2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77076-3_2</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goldstein, S. L., O'nions, R. K., and Hamilton, P. J.:
A Sm-Nd isotopic study of atmospheric dusts and particulates from major river systems, Earth Planet. Sc Lett., 70, 221–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(84)90007-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(84)90007-4</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Green, T. H.:
Significance of Nb∕Ta as an indicator of geochemical processes in the crust-mantle system, Chem. Geol., 120, 347–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00145-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00145-X</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gresse, P. G., De Beer, C. H., Chevallier, L. P., De Kock, G. S., and Thomas, R. J.:
Notice Explicative de la Carte Géologique du Maroc au 1∕50 000 feuille Tachoukacht, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique. Maroc, 393, 106, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hastie, A. R., Kerr, A. C., Pearce, J. A., and Mitchell, S. F.:
Classification of altered volcanic island arc rocks using immobile trace elements: development of the Th–Co discrimination diagram, J. Petrol., 48, 2341–2357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egm062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egm062</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hefferan, K., Soulaimani, A., Samson, S. D., Admou, H., Inglis, J., Saquaque, A., and Heywood, N.:
A reconsideration of Pan African orogenic cycle in the Anti-Atlas Mountains, Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 98, 34–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.03.007</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hofmann, A. W., Jochum, K. P., Seufert, M., and White, W. M.:
Nb and Pb in oceanic basalts: new constraints on mantle evolution, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 79, 33–45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90038-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90038-5</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Horstwood, M. S., Ko<mover accent="true"><i>s</i> <mo form="infix">ˇ</mo> </mover>ler, J., Gehrels, G., Jackson, S. E., McLean, N. M., Paton, C., and Schoene, B.:
Community-derived standards for LA-ICP-MS U-(Th-) Pb geochronology–Uncertainty propagation, age interpretation and data reporting, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 40, 311–332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2016.00379.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2016.00379.x</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hughes, C. J.:
Spilites, keratophyres, and the igneous spectrum, Geol. Mag., 109, 513–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800042795" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800042795</a>, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ikenne, M., Ennaciri, A., Ouguir, H., Cousens, B., Ziyadi, R., Mouhagir, M., and El-Gaouzi, A.:
Geochemical Signature And Geodynamic Significance Of An Ag-Hg Mineralized Dyke Swarm In The Neoproterozoic Inlier Of Imiter – Anti-Atlas (Morocco), Ofioliti, 32, 109–118, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janoušek, V., Farrow, C. M., and Erban, V.:
Interpretation of whole-rock geochemical data in igneous geochemistry: introducing Geochemical Data Toolkit (GCDkit), J. Petrol., 47, 1255–1259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egl013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egl013</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Janoušek, V., Moyen, J. F., Martin, H., Erban, V., and Farrow, C.:
Geochemical modelling of igneous processes: principles and recipes in R language. Bringing the Power of R to a Geochemical Community, Springer, Berlin, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46792-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46792-3</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karaoui, B., Breitkreuz, C., Mahmoudi, A., Youbi, N., Hofmann, M., Gärtner, A., and Linnemann, U.:
U–Pb zircon ages from volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Ediacaran Bas Draâ inlier (Anti-Atlas Morocco): Chronostratigraphic and provenance implications, Precambrian Res., 263, 43–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.03.003</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Labanieh, S.; Chauvel, C.; Germa, A.; and Quidelleur, X.:
Martinique: a Clear Case for Sediment Melting and Slab Dehydration as a Function of Distance to the Trench. J. Petrol., 53, 2441–2464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egs055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egs055</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leblanc, M. and Lancelot, J. R.:
Interprétation géodynamique du domaine pan-africain (Précambrien terminal) de l'Anti-Atlas (Maroc) à partir de données géologiques et géochronologiques, Can. J. Earth Sci., 17, 142–155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/e80-012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/e80-012</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Letsch, D., Houicha, M. E., von Quadt, A., and Winkler, W.:
missing link in the peri-Gondwanan terrane collage: the Precambrian basement of the Moroccan Meseta and its lower Paleozoic cover, Can. J. Earth Sci., 55, 33–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2017-0086" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2017-0086</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liégeois, J. P., Abdelsalam, M. G., Ennih, N., and Ouabadi, A.:
Metacraton: nature, genesis and behavior, Gondwana Res., 23, 220–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.02.016</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liégeois, J. P., Fekkak, A., Bruguier, O., Errami, E., and Ennih, N.:
The Lower Ediacaran (630–610&thinsp;Ma) Saghro group: an orogenic transgressive basin development during the early metacratonic evolution of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco), in: IGCP485 4th meeting, Algiers, p. 57, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liew, T. C. and Hofmann, A. W.:
Precambrian crustal components, plutonic associations, plate environment of the Hercynian Fold Belt of central Europe: indications from a Nd and Sr isotopic study, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 98, 129–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402106</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Linnemann, U., Pereira, F., Jeffries, T. E., Drost, K., and Gerdes, A.:
The Cadomian Orogeny and the opening of the Rheic Ocean: the diacrony of geotectonic processes constrained by LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon dating (Ossa-Morena and Saxo-Thuringian Zones, Iberian and Bohemian Massifs), Tectonophysics, 461, 21–43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.002</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Linnemann, U., Gerdes, A., Hofmann, M., and Marko, L.:
The Cadomian Orogen: Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian crustal growth and orogenic zoning along the periphery of the West African Craton-Constraints from U-Pb zircon ages and Hf isotopes (Schwarzburg Antiform, Germany), Precambrian Res., 244, 236–278, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.08.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.08.007</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Michard, A., Soulaimani, A., Ouanaimi, H., Raddi, Y., Brahim, L. A., Rjimati, E. C., and Saddiqi, O.:
Saghro Group in the Ougnat Massif (Morocco), an evidence for a continuous Cadomian basin along the northern West African Craton, Comptes Rendus Géosciences, 349, 81–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2017.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2017.01.001</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Middlemost, E. A.:
Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system, Earth-Sci. Rev., 37, 215–224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mrini, Z.:
Chronologie (Rb-Sr, U-Pb), traçage isotopique (Sr-Nd-Pb) des sources de roches magmatiques éburnéenne, panafricaine et hercynienne du Maroc, thesis, University of Marrakech, Morocco, 200 p., 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nance, R. D., Murphy, J. B., Strachan, R. A., Keppie, J. D., Gutiérrez-Alonso, G., Fernández-Suárez, J., and Pisarevsky, S. A.:
Neoproterozoic–early Palaeozoic tectonostratigraphy and palaeogeography of the peri-Gondwanan terranes: Amazonian v. West African connections, Geol. Soc. Sp., 297, 345–383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP297.17" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP297.17</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Connor, E. A., Barnes, R. P., Beddoe-Stephens, B., Fletcher, T., Gillespie, M. R., Hawkins, M. P., Loughlin, S. C., Smith, M., Smith, R. A., Waters, C. N., and Williams, M.:
Geology of the Drâa, Kerdous, and Boumalne Districts, Anti-Atlas, Nottingham British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Morocco, p. 324, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ouabid, M. and Garrido, C. J.:
Widespread Cadomian–Pan-African Ediacaran magmatism across the Moroccan Meseta: implication for the geodynamic evolution of the NW Gondwana margin, Precambrian Res., 387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2023.106992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2023.106992</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ougadire, M., Askkour, F., Favier, A., Ousbih, M., Ikenne, M., and Géraud, Y.:
Petrogenesis of the late Ediacaran A-type granites of the western part of the Moroccan Anti-Atlas belt: Insights from U–Pb dating, geochemistry and Sr–Nd isotopes of the Sidi El Houssein, Tafraout and Taourgha intrusions, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 203, 104947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104947" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.104947</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ouguir, H., Macaudière, J., and Dagallier, G.:
Le Protérozoïque supérieur d'Imiter, Saghro oriental, Maroc : un contexte géodynamique d'arrière-arc, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 22 (2), 173–189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(96)00002-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(96)00002-4</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ousbih, M., Ikenne, M., Cousens, B., Chelle-Michou, C., El Bilali, H., Gaouzi, A., and Ernst, R.:
Stratigraphy, geochronology, geochemistry and Nd isotopes of the Ouarzazate Group, Anti-Atlas, Morocco: Evidence of a Late Neoproterozoic LIP in the northwestern part of the West African Craton, Lithos, 474, 107593., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107593" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107593</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pearce, J. A.:
Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust, Lithos, 100, 14–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pearce, J. A. and Norry, M. J.: Petrogenetic implications of Ti, Zr, Y, and Nb variations in volcanic rocks. Contributions to mineralogy and petrology, 69, 33–47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375192</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pearce, J. A., Ernst, R. E., Peate, D. W., and Rogers, C.:
LIP printing: use of immobile element proxies to characterize Large Igneous Provinces in the geologic record, Lithos, 392–393, 106068, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106068</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pelleter, E., Cheilletz, A., Gasquet, D., Mouttaqi, A., Annich, M., Camus, Q., Deloule, E., Ouazzani, L., Bounajma, and H., Ouchtouban, L.:
U∕Pb ages of magmatism in the Zgounder Epithermal Ag–Hg Deposit, Sirwa Window, Anti-Atlas, Morocco, in: Mineral Deposits of North Africa, Springer, 143–165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31733-5_5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31733-5_5</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pereira, M. F., El Houicha, M., Chichorro, M., Armstrong, R., Jouhari, A., El Attari, A., and Silva, J. B.:
Evidence of a Paleoproterozoic basement in the Moroccan Variscan belt (Rehamna massif, western Meseta), Precambrian Res., 268, 61–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.07.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.07.010</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rojo-Pérez, E., Arenas, R., Fuenlabrada, J. M., Novo-Fernández, I., Martínez, S. S., Moreno-Martín, D., and Fernández, R. D.:
Lower Cambrian magmatism in the SW Iberian sector of the African–Gondwana margin: geochemical and isotopic keys to incipient tectonic switching, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP542-2022-294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP542-2022-294</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saadi, A.:
Contribution à l'étude écologique de deux hydrosystèmes temporaires saumâtres du Maroc: Zima et Sedd-El-Messjoun (Bassin de la Bahira), PhD thesis, Semlalia Faculty, University of Cady Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samson, S. D., Inglis, J. D., D'Lemos, R. S., Admou, H., Blichert-Toft, J., and Hefferan, K.:
Geochronological, geochemical, and Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on the origin of Neoproterozoic plagiogranites in the Tasriwine ophiolite, Anti-Atlas orogen, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 135, 133–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2004.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2004.08.003</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saunders, A. D. and Tarney, J.:
Geochemical characteristics of basaltic volcanism within back-arc basins, Geol. Soc. Sp., 16, 59–76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.016.01.05" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.016.01.05</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schulte, B., Boger, S. D., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., and Fanning, C. M.:
The Ouarzazate Supergroup and its plutonic keel: the relics of an Ediacaran silicic large igneous province in North Africa, J. Geol. Soc. London, 179, 5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-114</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shand, S. J.: Eruptive Rocks: Their Genesis, Composition, Classification, and Their Relation to Ore Deposits with a Chapter on Meteorites. John Wiley and Sons, New York, No. 552.1 S43, 1943.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shervais, J. W.:
The petrogenesis of modern and ophiolitic lavas reconsidered: Ti-V and Nb-Th, Geosci. Front., 13, 101319, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101319" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101319</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soulaimani, A., Ouanaimi, H., Saddiqi, O., Baidder, L., and Michard, A.:
The Anti-Atlas Pan-African Belt (Morocco): Overview and pending questions, Comptes Rendus Géoscience, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.07.002</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stern, R. J.:
A reinterpretation of the past 2.5 billion years of Earth's tectonic history: Two episodes each of plate and single-lid tectonics, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/B37966.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/B37966.1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, S. S. and McDonough, W. F.:
Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes, Geol. Soc. Sp., 42, 313–345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tahiri, A., Montero, P., El Hadi, H., Poyatos, D. M., Azor, A., Bea, F., and Lodeiro, F. G.:
Geochronological data on the Rabat–Tiflet granitoids: their bearing on the tectonics of the Moroccan Variscides, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 57, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.07.005</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomas, R. J., Chevallier, L. P., Gresse, P. G., Harmer, R. E., Eglington, B. M., Armstrong, R. A., De Beer, C. H., Martini, J. E. J., De Kock, G. S., Macey, P. H., and Ingram, B. A.: Precambrian evolution of the Sirwa window, Anti-Atlas orogen, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 118, 1–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00075-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00075-X</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomas, R. J., De Beer, C. H., Chevallier, L. P., De Kock, G. S., and Gresse, P. G.:
Notice Explicative de la Carte Géologique du Maroc au 1∕50 000 feuille Assarag, Notes et Mémoires Service Géologique, Maroc, 392, 84, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomas, R. J., Fekkak, A., Ennih, N., Errami, E., Loughlin, S. C., Gresse, P. G., and Liégeois, J.-P.:
A new lithostratigraphic framework for the Anti-Atlas Orogen, Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 39, 217–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.046</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Toummite, A., Liégeois, J. P., Gasquet, D., Bruguier, O., Beraaouz, E. H., and Ikenne, M.:
Field, geochemistry and Sr-Nd isotopes of the Pan-African granitoids from the Tifnoute Valley (Sirwa, Anti-Atlas, Morocco): a post-collisional event in a metacratonic setting, Miner. Petrol., 107, 739–763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-012-0245-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-012-0245-3</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vasey, D. A., Cowgill, E., and Cooper, K. M.:
A preliminary framework for magmatism in modern continental back-arc basins and its application to the Triassic-Jurassic tectonic evolution of the Caucasus, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 22, e2020GC009490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009490</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.:
How many grains are needed for a provenance study?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 224, 441–451, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.037</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vermeesch, P.:
IsoplotR: A Free and Open Toolbox for Geochronology, Geosci. Front., 9, 1479–1493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walsh, G. J., Aleinikoff, J. N., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., and Armstrong, T. R.:
U–Pb zircon geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic Tagragra de Tata inlier and its Neoproterozoic cover, western Anti-Atlas, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 117 , 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00044-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00044-X</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walsh, G. J., Aleinikoff, J. N., Harrison, R. W., Yazidi, A., Burton, W. C., Quick, J. E., Benziane, F., Yazidi, A., and Saadane, A.:
Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Jebel Saghro and Bou Azzer—El Graara inliers, eastern and central Anti-Atlas, Morocco, Precambrian Res., 216, 23–62, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j</a>. precamres.2012.06.010, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilson, M.: Igneous Petrogenesis: A Global Tectonic Approach, Unwin Hyman, London, 466 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6788-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6788-4</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winchester, J. A. and Floyd, P. A.:
Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements, Chem. Geol., 20, 325–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2</a>, 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yajioui, Z., Karaoui, B., Chew, D., Breitkreuz, C., and Mahmoudi, A.:
U–Pb zircon geochronology of the Ediacaran volcano-sedimentary succession of the NE Saghro inlier (Anti-Atlas, Morocco): chronostratigraphic correlation on the northwestern margin of Gondwana, Gondwana Res., 87, 263–277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j</a>. gr.2020.06.015, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Youbi, N., Ernst, R. E., Soderlund, U., Boumehdi, M. A., Ait Lahna, A., Tassinari, C. C. G., El Moume, W., and Bensalah, M. K.:
The Central Iapetus magmatic province: an updated review and link with the ca. 580&thinsp;Ma Gaskiers glaciation, in: Mass Extinctions, Volcanism, and Impacts: New Developments, edited by: Adatte, T., Bond, D. P. G., and Keller, G., Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 544, 35–66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/2020.2544(02)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/2020.2544(02)</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
