<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-17-803-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Statistical characteristics of non-volcanic tremor distributions along the Mexican Subduction Zone</article-title><alt-title>Statistical characteristics of non-volcanic tremor distributions</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Rodríguez-Pérez</surname><given-names>Quetzalcoatl</given-names></name>
          <email>quetza@geociencias.unam.mx</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5854-6514</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Márquez-Ramírez</surname><given-names>Víctor Hugo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Zúñiga</surname><given-names>Francisco Ramón</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0277-3034</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación, Mexico City, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Instituto de Geociencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez-Pérez (quetza@geociencias.unam.mx)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>803</fpage><lpage>824</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez-Pérez et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e104">We analyze the statistical characteristics of non-volcanic tremor (NVT) sequences in the Mexican subduction zone. To this end, we employ various techniques, including the Gutenberg–Richter relationship, non-extensive statistics, and multifractal detrended moving-average analysis, to extract information on magnitude and interevent-time distributions. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value results reveal that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from 1.25 to 2.42, with the highest values occurring in the down-dip portion of the plate interface. In contrast, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value shows an inverse behavior, reaching its highest values in the interplate coupling region. Similar to tectonic earthquakes, NVT sequences exhibit a multifractal structure in both magnitude and interevent-time series. The multifractality analysis suggests that this behavior is associated with long-term correlations, the probability distribution of the data, and nonlinear dynamics. Both apparent and intrinsic multifractality are identified, with the former being dominant. Our estimates of the Hurst exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) range from 0.65 to 1.06; most sequences indicate strong persistence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while values exceeding unity suggest a transition toward non-stationary behavior. These high temporal correlations may reflect localized fluid-perturbed regions, although this interpretation remains speculative. Regarding the distribution that best describes interevent sequences, we find that most sequences are well described by a Lognormal distribution and, to a lesser extent, by a Gamma distribution. Finally, observations of tectonic tremor duration exhibit substantial scatter, resulting in low coefficients of determination in scaling relationships. The source of this variability may be related to the NVT generation mechanism or to detection and characterization processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación</funding-source>
<award-id>project 7197</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e156">Non-volcanic tremor (NVT) is an enigmatic seismic phenomenon that has become a topic of increasing interest, particularly in subduction zones. NVTs are emergent seismic signals of long duration and low amplitude (Obara, 2002). Previous studies have shown that NVTs are composed of repeating small low-frequency earthquakes, commonly accompanied by very-low-frequency earthquakes that, in both cases, involve shear failure and slip (Shelly et al., 2007; Bostock et al., 2015; Gomberg et al., 2016a, b). NVTs mainly occur along the plate interface, close to the shallow and deep edges of locked regions. This phenomenon can also be observed in other tectonic environments, such as in convergent margins (e.g., Taiwan; Tang et al., 2010) and continental transform faults (e.g., California; Nadeau and Dolenc, 2005; Shelly, 2010). Fluids are implicated in generating NVTs, similar to volcanic tremor processes (Obara, 2002). Pressure and temperature conditions in subduction zones, together with dehydration processes, control the occurrence of NVT (Yoshioka et al., 2008; Peacock, 2009). It has been reported that NVTs occur in regions of high pore-fluid pressure (Shelly et al., 2006). Other factors also contribute, including the composition of the overriding plate and processes such as metamorphism of subducting seamounts (Wada et al., 2008). Non-volcanic tremors commonly exhibit episodic activity, with periods of intense activity lasting from days to weeks, separated by quiescent intervals of months with few or no events (Obara, 2002). NVTs are also closely associated with slow earthquakes, with both phenomena sharing temporal and spatial occurrence (Rogers and Dragert, 2003). Another important feature of NVTs is their ability to be triggered by large earthquakes, such as the 2002 Denali earthquake (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Alaska (Rubinstein et al., 2007) and the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Japan (Miyazawa and Mori, 2005), both of which triggered enhanced NVT activity.</p>
      <p id="d2e189">Tectonic tremors have been reported along the Middle America Trench in Mexico, in the states of Guerrero (Payero et al., 2008; Cruz-Atienza et al., 2015; Villafuerte and Cruz-Atienza, 2017; Husker et al., 2019; Plata-Martínez et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2025), Jalisco-Colima (Ide, 2012), and Oaxaca (Brudzinski et al., 2010; Husker et al., 2019). In Guerrero, NVTs have been detected at approximately 200 km downdip, at depths of 40–50 km, and closer to the trench, at depths of 10–16 km (Plata-Martínez et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2025). Similarly, in Oaxaca, NVTs are located about 150–200 km from the trench at depths of 30–50 km (Brudzinski et al., 2010). In Western Mexico, NVTs occur in a narrow band oriented parallel to the trench, mostly at depths of 30–50 km (Ide, 2012). Much of the research on tectonic tremors has focused on locating events, generating catalogs, and their tectonic interpretation. Fewer studies, however, have examined the statistical characteristics of event occurrence. For example, Kao et al. (2010) determined the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of NVT sequences in northern Cascadia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.7), finding that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Staudenmaier et al. (2019) estimated the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of NVTs in the San Andreas Fault (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), obtaining a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of 2.52. In contrast, other studies reported extremely high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Sweet et al., 2014; Bostock et al., 2015). In this article, we studied the statistical features of NVT sequences generated at the Mexican subduction zone. We analyzed the Gutenberg-Richter relationship, non-extensive statistics, and multifractality of magnitude and interevent-time distributions. Our results provide detailed statistical characterization of NVTs in subduction zones, which may contribute to a better understanding of their generation mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Tectonic setting</title>
      <p id="d2e343">The Mexican subduction zone (MSZ) is located along the border of three tectonic plates: the Cocos (CO), North American (NA), and Rivera (RI) plates, respectively (Fig. 1). Convergence rates predicted from the NUVEL1-A model (DeMets et al., 1994) fluctuate from 2.0 to 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the RI-NA convergence in the north (Jalisco-Colima) to the CO-NA convergence in the south (Oaxaca), respectively (Fig. 1). The rupture areas of the previous largest earthquakes exhibit a seismic gap in the MSZ, known as the Guerrero seismic gap (GG). The GG is a 200 km long segment in the CO-NA plate boundary (Fig. 1). The gap is capable of producing an earthquake with a magnitude of 8.1–8.4 if the entire gap were ruptured in a single event (Singh and Mortera, 1991). The gap has not experienced a significant event (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) since 1911. The geometry of the subducted slab varies from north to south (Hayes et al., 2012). In the Jalisco region, the RI plate subducts at a steep angle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and then the dip angle of the CO plate decreases gradually toward the southeast. In the Gurrero-Oaxaca region, the subducted slab is almost subhorizontal (Pardo and Suárez, 1995; Pérez-Campos et al., 2008). As mentioned above, non-volcanic tremors occur at certain regions within the subduction zone regime. They appear to signal the transition from creep to locking trench parallel segments (Chen et al., 2025).</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e389">Tectonic framework of the Mexican subduction zone. TMVB is the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. CO, NA, PA, and RI are the Cocos, North American, Pacific, and Rivera plates, respectively. GG is the Guerrero seismic gap. Black arrows indicate the convergence rate among tectonic plates. Dashed lines represent contour lines of the subducted plate, spaced every 20 km, from 20 to 100 km (Hayes et al., 2012).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d2e413">We retrieved non-volcanic tremor catalogs for six sequences along the Mexican subduction zone, as reported in previous studies (Ide, 2012; Idehara et al., 2014; Husker et al., 2019; Plata-Martínez et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2025). We studied NVT events occurring from 2005 to 2019 with hypocentral depths less than 50 km and magnitudes ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.65 (Table 1). Sequences 1, 3, and 4 occurred downdip of the coupling plate interface in the Guerrero segment, while sequences 5 and 6 took place at the coupling plate interface of the same segment. Sequence 2 was located further west, at the boundary between the subduction regimes of the Rivera and Cocos plates (Fig. 2). Catalogs for sequences 1–3 are available through the World Tremor Database (see the Data Availability section). The information reported in these catalogs includes origin time, hypocentral location, moment magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and event duration for sequences 1–3 and 5. For sequence 4, locations were obtained using a single local seismic station, providing only origin time and hypocentral location. Similarly, sequence 6 does not report magnitudes. In this case, Chen et al. (2025) used an algorithm based on envelope correlation and matched filtering, providing location, duration, and average seismic energy rate instead of magnitude. Although magnitudes are unavailable for sequences 4 and 6, these catalogs provide sufficient information to analyze interevent times. Because NVTs often consist of superimposed low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs) of low amplitude, some studies prefer to use average energy or the root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude as a proxy for seismic energy. Hypocenters of NVTs were located in the states of Guerrero and Jalisco and were detected primarily using temporary seismic networks (sequences 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6). These networks include: the Mesoamerican Subduction Experiment (MASE, 2004–2007), Mapping the Rivera Subduction Zone (MARS, 2006–2007), and the Guerrero Seismic Gap project (G-GAP, 2009–2014).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e440">Studied non-volcanic tremor sequences. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of events; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the moment magnitude; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the start and end dates of the located NVTs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Instrumentation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1908</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">temporary land</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14 January 2005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28 May 2007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ide (2012), Idehara et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1411</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">temporary land</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26 January 2006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6 June 2007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–3.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ide (2012), Idehara et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">temporary land</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26 November 2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 August 2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ide (2012), Idehara et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 408</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">single station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4 March 2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29 May 2022</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Husker et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ocean bottom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22 November 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 November 2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10–2.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Plata-Martínez et al. (2021)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">637</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ocean bottom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21 November 2017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 September 2019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Chen et al. (2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e744">Hypocenter locations of all the studied non-volcanic tremor sequences along the Mexican subduction zone. <bold>(a)</bold> Sequence 1, <bold>(b)</bold> sequence 2, <bold>(c)</bold> sequence 3, <bold>(d)</bold> sequence 4, <bold>(e)</bold> sequence 5, and <bold>(f)</bold> sequence 6.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Estimation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</title>
      <p id="d2e795">The earthquake frequency-magnitude distribution (FMD) is commonly described by the Gutenberg-Richter law (Gutenberg and Richter, 1944):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of earthquakes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the magnitude of completeness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are constants that describe the earthquake productivity and the proportion of small to large events, respectively. Globally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value is about one on average (Lay and Wallace, 1995). Fluctuations from this value are due to several factors, such as fluid pressure (Henderson et al., 1994), heterogeneity in the fault zone (Mogi, 1963), thermal gradient (Warren and Latham, 1970), and variations in the state of stress (Schorlemmer et al., 2005; Scholz, 2015). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value is determined using the maximum likelihood method proposed by Aki (1965). The equation that describes this estimator is the following

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M45" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the catalog completeness magnitude, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average magnitude with a magnitude greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the magnitude binning interval. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated using the maximum curvature method (Woessner and Wiemer, 2005). We determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values for NVT sequences with reported magnitudes (sequences 1–3 and 5), and the results are shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2. Following Woessner and Wiemer (2005), we also used a bootstrap approach to estimate uncertainties in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1016">Estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the studied NVT sequences. Blue squares show the cumulative number of events versus magnitude. Red triangles exhibit the number of events. The solid black lines indicate the Gutenberg-Righter frequency magnitude distributions. <bold>(a)</bold> Sequence 1, <bold>(b)</bold> sequence 2, <bold>(c)</bold> sequence 3, and <bold>(d)</bold> sequence 5.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1060">Results for the Gutenberg-Richter relationship. Uncertainties were quantified based on a bootstrap approach.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Non-extensive statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1307">Non-extensive statistical mechanics (NESM) provides a theoretical framework for analyzing non-equilibrium complex systems, including earthquake phenomena. For systems exhibiting long-range correlations, memory effects, or fractal characteristics, NESM offers a particularly suitable mathematical approach (Tsallis, 2009). Within this context, Sotolongo-Costa and Posadas (2004) proposed the fragment asperity model, in which the release of seismic energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is linked to the size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments that occupy the space between irregular fault interfaces. Silva et al. (2006) used a volumetric relationship between seismic energy and fragment size in the form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, under this assumption, the cumulative distribution of the number of earthquakes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a magnitude greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value is in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a proportionality parameter between the released seismic energy and the fragment size. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value quantifies the length scale of spatial interactions; a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to short-range correlations, while increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>indicates that the physical state becomes progressively more unstable. High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values suggest that the fault planes are out of equilibrium, implying a higher likelihood of subsequent events (Sotolongo-Costa and Posadas, 2004). In most tectonic regimes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> typically ranges from 1.5 to 1.7 (Sarlis et al., 2010). We calculated the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values for all NVT sequences with reported magnitudes. As in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, we employed bootstrap resampling to quantify uncertainties in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are presented in Fig. 4 and Table 3.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1559">Normalized cumulative number of earthquake with magnitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>th</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fitting obtained with the fragment asperity model for the seismicity monitored in each NVT sequence. <bold>(a)</bold> Sequence 1, <bold>(b)</bold> sequence 2, <bold>(c)</bold> sequence 3, and <bold>(d)</bold> sequence 5.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1598">Results for the fragment asperity model. Uncertainties were quantified based on a bootstrap approach.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60.24</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Multifractal detrended moving average analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1810">The multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA) is a technique used to quantify the scaling behavior and correlations in time series (Kantelhardt et al., 2002). In seismology, MFDFA has shown that seismicity exhibits multifractal behavior, reflecting the nonlinear dynamics of tectonic processes (Telesca and Lapenna, 2006). The method has been applied to track the evolution of multifractal parameters across different stages of seismic activity (Monterrubio-Velasco et al., 2020) and in long-term regional studies (Alam et al., 2023), illustrating its ability to explore the organization and variability of seismic events. An improvement to MFDFA, the multifractal detrended moving average analysis (MFDMA), was proposed by Gu and Zhou (2010), providing enhanced robustness to trends and non-stationarities in the data. In this study, we employ MFDMA to investigate the multifractal properties of both interevent times and magnitude distributions of NVT sequences, allowing us to characterize apparent and intrinsic multifractality. We summarize the MFDMA algorithm of Gu and Zhou (2010) as follows. First, a cumulative time series of a given physical parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constructed and represented as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M101" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2, 3, …, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (length of the time series) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observed time series. Then, a moving average function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated in a moving window as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>⌊</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⌋</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the window size. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⌊</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>⌋</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the floor function (the largest integer less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⌈</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>⌉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the ceiling function (the smallest integer greater than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The position parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, describes the delay between the moving average function and the original time series (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For example, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.5, and 1, it describes a backward, centered, and forward moving average, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e2082">Afterwards, the residual sequences are obtained by detrending the time series through removing the average function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The residual series (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is divided into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> disjoint segments with the same size of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The residual sequence for each segment is denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then we calculate the root-mean-square fluctuation function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for a segment of size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th order fluctuation function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is obtained by

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M131" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we have

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the scaling behavior of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows the relation that is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Holder exponent or generalized Hurst exponent. The multifractal scaling exponent is calculated by

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Finally, the singularity strength function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the multifractal spectrum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be obtained as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M141" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M142" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            respectively. In the multifractal analysis of sequences 1 to 4, we used the following input parameters: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increments of 0.2, the lower bound of segment size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is fixed to 10, while the upper bound is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as recommended by Gu and Zhou (2010). In the case of sequences 4 and 5, the upper bound of segment size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because they have less data than the other sequences. The parameters adopted ensure methodological consistency. The choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> provides sufficient scale for local trend estimation, balancing statistical reliability in short series with detailed detrending in longer ones. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a backward-moving average, preserving causality, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range probes multifractal behavior across fluctuation magnitudes and maintains numerical stability. This configuration enables robust, consistent scaling analysis across datasets of varying lengths. Results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for interevent time and magnitude distributions are shown in Figs. 5 and 6 and Figs. 7 to 9, respectively. In the MFDFA framework, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fluctuation order and is used to scan different fluctuation scales. In contrast, in the context of non-extensive statistical mechanics, the non-extensive parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value) quantifies non-additivity and entropy.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2973">Multifractal analysis of magnitude for sequences 1 <bold>(a)</bold> and 2 <bold>(b)</bold> (fluctuation function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Hurst exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; multifractal scaling exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and multifractal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In all cases, the original, shuffled, and IAAFT surrogates data are shown in red, green, and blue color, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3048">Multifractal analysis of magnitude for sequences 3 <bold>(a)</bold> and 5 <bold>(b)</bold> (fluctuation function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Hurst exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; multifractal scaling exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and multifractal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In all cases, the original, shuffled, and IAAFT surrogates data are shown in red, green, and blue color, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3122">Multifractal analysis of interevent time for sequences 1 <bold>(a)</bold> and 2 <bold>(b)</bold> (fluctuation function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Hurst exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; multifractal scaling exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and multifractal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In all cases, the original, shuffled, and IAAFT surrogates data are shown in red, green, and blue color, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3196">Multifractal analysis of interevent time for sequences 3 <bold>(a)</bold> and 4 <bold>(b)</bold> (fluctuation function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Hurst exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; multifractal scaling exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and multifractal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In all cases, the original, shuffled, and IAAFT surrogates data are shown in red, green, and blue color, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3270">Multifractal analysis of interevent time for sequences 5 <bold>(a)</bold> and 6 <bold>(b)</bold> (fluctuation function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Hurst exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; multifractal scaling exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and multifractal spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In all cases, the original, shuffled, and IAAFT surrogates data are shown in red, green, and blue color, respectively.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Multifractal parameters</title>
      <p id="d2e3350">We determined multifractal parameters using the equations presented in the previous section, following De Freitas and França (2024). We start with the degree of asymmetry (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M182" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the value for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is maximum. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is symmetric. On the contrary, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the symmetry is right-skewed, and if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the symmetry is left-skewed. The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the extreme values of the singularity exponent and are related to the minimum and maximum fluctuation of the signal. The degree of multifractality (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is determined by

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M192" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            A low value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes that the time series is close to fractal. On the other hand, a high value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that the multifractal strength is higher (De Freitas and De Medeiros, 2009). The singularity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) describes the broadness of the singularity spectrum and is defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M196" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In the case that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the left-hand side is less deep, while if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both depths of the tails are equal. According to Ihlen (2012), a long left tail indicates that the singularities are stronger (many large fluctuations/more abrupt behavior). In contrast, a long right tail indicates that the singularities are weaker (smoother signal with smaller variations). The Hurst index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be obtained from the multifractal spectrum through the second-order generalized Hurst exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it indicates persistence in long-range correlation, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a random character of the series (past and future fluctuations are uncorrelated or Brownian motion). On the other hand, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects anti-persistence. In this case, the fluctuations tend not to continue in the same direction, but instead turn back on themselves, resulting in a less smooth time series (Hampson and Mallen, 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>3.2.5</label><title>Sources of multifractality</title>
      <p id="d2e3707">Multifractality can be classified into two categories: apparent and intrinsic. The former type refers to the multifractality that arises from spurious or artifactual patterns, while the latter refers to a genuine origin derived from nonlinear processes within the data (Saichev and Sornette, 2006). The differentiation between apparent and intrinsic multifractality is crucial for understanding the underlying processes in a time series (Jiang et al., 2019). On the other hand, there are three primary sources for multifractality in time series: (1) the non-Gaussian distribution of innovations, (2) linear long-range correlations, and (3) nonlinear long-range correlations (Jiang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2023). Two methods are commonly used to investigate these sources of multifractality: namely, the shuffling (Kantelhardt et al., 2002) and the surrogating (Theiler et al., 1992) procedures. These methods involve modifying the original sample to eliminate specific sources of multifractality. The first source (non-Gaussian distribution) is typically examined using shuffled time series. The random shuffling of a time series removes both linear and nonlinear temporal correlations (which may contribute to the scaling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) while preserving the probability distribution (PDF) (Kantelhardt, 2009). Thus, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the shuffled series scales in the same way as that of the original series, one may infer that the scaling is primarily due to the probability distribution of the data. Conversely, if the shuffled series exhibits weaker multifractality compared to the original data, then multifractality likely arises from a combination of temporal correlations and the PDF. Consequently, if no multifractal features remain after performing the shuffling procedure, it can be interpreted that long-range correlations are the dominant source of multifractality in the original series.</p>
      <p id="d2e3732">The surrogate time series method generates time series via a Fourier transform, preserving amplitudes while randomizing the phases, and then applying an inverse Fourier transform. In this form, non-linearities in the series are removed while preserving long-range correlations. The iterated amplitude-adjusted Fourier transform (IAAFT) algorithm (Schreiber and Schmitz, 1996, 2000) is appropriate for this purpose. Using the surrogate series, we performed statistical tests for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to determine the presence or absence of intrinsic multifractality in the data. Specifically, the tests evaluate whether each indicator computed from the original series is greater than its counterpart derived from the IAAFT series. In other words, we calculate the probability that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IAAFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-value</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Pr</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IAAFT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a multifractal indicator, as proposed by Wang et al. (2023). Wang et al. (2023) also stated that if the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value is smaller than a significance level (usually 5 %), then we can reject the hypothesis that the original time series is monofractal. Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values further suggest that the original time series exhibits intrinsic multifractality beyond fat-tailed distributions and linear long-range correlations. Alternatively, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values suggest the absence of intrinsic multifractality (De Freitas and França, 2024). Here, we applied MFDFA to the magnitude and interevent time series of NVT. In both cases, we generated 100 shuffled and IAAFT surrogate time series, and computed the multifractal indicators to analyze the source of multifractality. Surrogate data were used specifically used to assess the presence of intrinsic multifractality. The results are presented in Figs. 5 to 9 and Table 4.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3868">Testing multifractality of multifractal parameters. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the moment magnitude; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the interevent times; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the degree of asymmetry; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the degree of multifractality; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the singularity parameter; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Hurst index. The symbol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the mean and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the standard deviation. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values represent the proportion of IAAFT surrogates measured for each indicator that exceeds the index's value for the original time series.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="18">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">1.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.254</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.203</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.061</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.822</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.118</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.007</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.022</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">1.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">1.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.204</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.452</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.311</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.194</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.724</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.289</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.413</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.312</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.203</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.025</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.125</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.129</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.132</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.256</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.031</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.122</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.044</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.224</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">0.021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">0.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS6">
  <label>3.2.6</label><title>Interevent-time distribution and duration scaling</title>
      <p id="d2e4935">Several interevent-time distributions have been proposed in the literature to explain earthquake interevent-time behavior (e.g., Gamma, Exponential, Lognormal, Weibull) (Corral, 2006; Davidsen and Kwiatek, 2013). We fitted interevent time data from all the NVT sequences, considering the previously mentioned statistical distributions, using the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method as described by Mesimeri et al. (2019). To determine the goodness of fit, we applied the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test. The Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC and BIC, respectively) were also calculated to assess the relative quality of the statistical models. The best-fitting distribution is the one with the lowest AIC and BIC values. The obtained interevent-time probability distributions are shown in Fig. 10 and Table 5. Additionally, we determined scaling relationships between tremor duration and magnitude for sequences 1 to 3 and 5. The obtained scaling relations have the following form:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M259" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the duration of the NVT, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the moment magnitude, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are constants. We present the estimated scaling relationships in Fig. 11 and Table 5.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e5001">Probability density functions of the interevent times for the NVT sequences and fitted curves of different statistical distributions (exponential, Gamma, Lognormal, and Weibull). <bold>(a)</bold> Sequence 1, <bold>(b)</bold> sequence 2, <bold>(c)</bold> sequence 3, <bold>(d)</bold> sequence 4, <bold>(e)</bold> sequence 5, and <bold>(f)</bold> sequence 6.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e5031">NVT duration scaling relationships (blue lines). In all figures, color indicates the density of NVT observations. <bold>(a)</bold> Sequence 1, <bold>(b)</bold> sequence 2, <bold>(c)</bold> sequence 3, and <bold>(d)</bold> sequence 5.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/803/2026/se-17-803-2026-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T5" specific-use="star"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5056">Estimated parameters for the PDF of interevent times. AIC and BIC are the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the test statistic.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Distribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">K-S test </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">AIC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">BIC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lognormal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2696</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5389</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5385</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Weibull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2399</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4795</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4791</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gamma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4036</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">359</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">719</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">721</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lognormal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1424</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2845</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2841</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Weibull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1308</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2611</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2608</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gamma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1191</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2378</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2375</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">166</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">164</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lognormal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">527</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">051</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Weibull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">009</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">011</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gamma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">035</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">066</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">062</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4202</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8402</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lognormal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">533</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">063</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">059</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Weibull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">883</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">762</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">759</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gamma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">665</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0064</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">326</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">323</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">681</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">359</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">358</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lognormal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">208</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">419</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">423</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Weibull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">188</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">382</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">384</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gamma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">185</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">374</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">377</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">229</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">461</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">462</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lognormal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">246</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">495</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">499</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Weibull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">139</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">283</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">286</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gamma</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">156</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">159</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">655</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1312</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1314</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e7122">Our estimates of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value showed that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values for NVTs at the Mexican subduction zone range from 1.25 to 2.42, with completeness magnitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between 1.10 and 1.80. Sequences 1 and 3 have the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, indicating a possible distinct characteristic of the down-dip Guerrero segment of the Cocos plate. They are followed by sequence 2, located at the interface between the Rivera and Cocos plates. The lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value is found for sequence 5 in the Guerrero Gap region (Fig. 2 and Table 2), which unfortunately cannot be corroborated by sequence 6 at the same region, as it does not include magnitude data. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value from the non-extensive statistical analysis fluctuates from 1.39 to 1.65. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values show an apparent inverse relationship with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, since the sequences located near the trench (2 and 5) have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values than those located down-dip (1 and 3), which exhibit similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values. Bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations) was used to estimate uncertainties in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values (Tables 2 and 3). Smaller sequences (e.g., sequence 5, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">101</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibit larger relative uncertainties, which are now explicitly reported. A Monte Carlo analysis incorporating these uncertainties confirms a strong negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, with mean Pearson coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (95 % CI: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.999</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.743</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), supporting the inverse relationship observed across the NVT sequences.</p>
      <p id="d2e7287">Multifractal indicators of the original time series show that the multifractal spectra are mostly right-skewed (magnitude sequences 1 to 4, interevent time sequences 1, 2, and 6). In contrast, left-skewed spectra correspond to interevent time sequences 3 and 4. Sequence 5 exhibits a symmetric multifractal spectrum. Results for the degree of multifractality (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicate that interevent time series have a higher multifractal strength than magnitude time series. On the other hand, the singularity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates that the singularities are weaker for magnitude sequences 2 and 3, as well as interevent time sequences 1–2 and 6. Conversely, the singularities are stronger for interevent time sequences 3 and 4. Estimates of the Hurst exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) depict a long-term persistence signature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). By comparing the multifractal spectra (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) obtained from the original, shuffled, and surrogate time series, we observe that multifractality is not completely removed in all cases. However, in several sequences, the multifractal indicators become statistically indistinguishable from those derived from surrogate data. Statistical tests based on IAAFT surrogates show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values associated with the multifractal indicators (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) vary significantly across sequences. Magnitude sequence 5 and interevent time sequences 1, 4, and 5 exhibit relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, indicating no statistically significant differences with respect to surrogate data. In contrast, magnitude sequence 1 shows consistently low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values across multiple indicators, suggesting statistically significant deviations from surrogate behavior. For the interevent time sequences 2, 3, and 6, low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values are observed for key parameters, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and, in sequence 3, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as well, indicating significant differences relative to the surrogate series. In magnitude sequences 2 and 3, the results are mixed: some indicators yield low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, while others remain high, preventing a clear classification based solely on the statistical tests. Overall, the results indicate that the statistical significance of multifractality varies across sequences and depends on the specific indicator considered.</p>
      <p id="d2e7491">Regarding the inter-event time distributions, a comparison of the fitted probability density functions (PDFs) with the empirical distributions from sequences 1 to 4 showed that the Lognormal distribution provided the best fit. In contrast, for sequences 5 and 6, the Gamma distribution yielded the best fit for the interevent time data. In all cases, the least well-fitting distribution is the Exponential distribution (Fig. 10 and Table 5). Finally, event duration observations exhibit large scatter, resulting in linear scaling relationships with low coefficients of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 11 and Table 6). This scatter is intrinsic to the genesis of NVTs or is associated with the detection process, as it is present in all reported sequences.</p>

<table-wrap id="T6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d2e7517">Duration scaling relationships (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the determination coefficient; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the slope and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the intercept.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sequence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.696</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.593</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.341</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.104</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.393</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.323</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.161</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.182</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.208</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e7695">We start the discussion by comparing our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value estimates with previous studies. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value associated with NVTs has been determined in both crustal and subduction environments, with the latter being the most common. In crustal regions, for example, along the San Andreas Fault (Parkfield segment), Staudenmaier et al. (2019) calculated a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of 2.52 for NVT episodes. For subduction zones, it has been found that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of NVTs ranges between 1 and 5 (Kao et al., 2010; Rabbel et al., 2011; Gallego et al., 2013; Sweet et al., 2014; Bostock et al., 2015). The Cascadia subduction zone, particularly in Vancouver Island, exhibits both low and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) (Kao et al., 2010; Sweet et al., 2014; Bostock et al., 2015). In Chile, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of NVT sequences was determined to be 2.4 (Gallego et al., 2013). Regarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value estimations of NVTs at the Cocos plate, Rabbel et al. (2011) estimated a value of 1 in the region of Costa Rica. Our results show that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value varies from 1.25 to 2.42 for the NVTs detected in the Mexican subduction regime studied. We observed that in the down-dip segment, NVT sequences have the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values (2.22–2.42), while in the interplate coupling region, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value ranges from 1.25 to 1.41 (Table 2). High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values may indicate a greater degree of fracturing, as they reflect a larger proportion of small-magnitude events relative to larger ones. In general, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values obtained for the coupling region do not differ significantly from those reported for tectonic earthquakes. For example, for the Cocos plate, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value for tectonic seismic events has been observed to lie in the interval of 0.8–1.3 (Nishikawa and Ide, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d2e7819">Temporal variations in seismic network geometry can significantly influence the magnitude of completeness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for NVT sequences. Sequences 1–3 (Ide, 2012; Idehara et al., 2014) were recorded using temporary networks such as MARS and MASE, where changes in station coverage over time affected event detection and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1908</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1411, 6776; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.65, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.21, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2.00). Sequence 4 (Husker et al., 2019) was analyzed using limited station coverage, constraining the detection of low-magnitude events, although magnitudes were not estimated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">408</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In contrast, sequences 5 (Plata-Martínez et al., 2021) and 6 (Chen et al., 2025) used submarine seismometers, allowing reliable detection of events, despite Chen et al. (2025) not reporting magnitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">101</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 637; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges 0.10 to 2.70 and not reported, respectively). These examples demonstrate that temporal changes in network configuration, station density, and instrument type may directly affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, consequently, influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value calculations and their interpretation for NVT catalogs.</p>
      <p id="d2e7955">In terms of the non-extensive statistical analysis, our estimates of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value for NVTs in Mexico are consistent with previous reports from subduction zones, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values range from 1.61 to 1.69 (Scherrer et al., 2015). These results agree with our findings, in which the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value varies from 1.64 to 1.65. Our results also show that down-dip interplate sequences have lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values (1.39) (Table 3). High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values in coastal regions may be explained by greater stress heterogeneity, associated with plate coupling and asperity distribution, compared to down-dip regions, where different conditions, such as pressure, temperature, and rock structure prevail.</p>
      <p id="d2e7993">Regarding the multifractal analysis, our results indicate that both magnitude and interevent time NVT sequences exhibit multifractal structures similar to those observed in tectonic earthquakes (interevent time, Michas et al., 2015; magnitude, De Freitas and França, 2024). Tests based on surrogate data show that only one sequence exhibits intrinsic multifractality, while four sequences display apparent multifractality and five sequences yield inconclusive results. De Freitas and França (2024) also reported that seismicity in some subduction zones shows apparent multifractality, whereas others exhibit intrinsic multifractality, which is consistent with our findings. The estimated Hurst exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values further illustrate the heterogeneity of the sequences, ranging from 0.65 to 1.06 (Table 4). Several sequences fall within the range typically associated with persistent behavior (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while some sequences, including magnitude sequences 1, 2, and 5, reach or slightly exceed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Values above unity should be interpreted with caution, as they may indicate non-stationary or trending behavior, rather than purely long-range dependence. Nonetheless, these high values may reflect strong temporal correlations in certain sequences.</p>
      <p id="d2e8032">High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values have previously been linked to fault-zone properties (Cisternas et al., 2004). While we hypothesize that they could reflect limited volumes of perturbed regions containing fluids, this interpretation remains speculative. The observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are statistically comparable to those reported for regional seismicity and aftershock sequences: southern Italy (0.5–0.92, Telesca et al., 2001), Taiwan and Greece (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Chen et al., 2008; Gkarlaouni et al., 2017), and the San Andreas Fault (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, De Freitas et al., 2013), with Izmit aftershocks reaching 0.95 (Cisternas et al., 2004). Although fundamental differences exist between aftershock relaxation and NVT generation, the similarity in scaling behavior suggests comparable long-term memory in the underlying processes. The surrogate analysis indicates that the physical origin of multifractality is not uniform across sequences. Magnitude sequence 1 and interevent time sequences 2, 3, and 6 show statistically significant deviations from surrogate data, suggesting contributions from temporal correlations and potential nonlinear interactions, whereas other sequences are consistent with apparent multifractality arising from broad distributions or finite-size effects. Overall, these results support the interpretation that the observed multifractal behavior arises from a combination of mechanisms, whose relative influence varies across sequences and depends on their temporal organization.</p>
      <p id="d2e8069">The interevent time analysis showed that NVT sequences 1 to 4 are well described by a Lognormal distribution, while sequences 5 and 6 are better fitted by a Gamma distribution (Table 5). Although the Lognormal distribution provides the best fit for sequences 1 to 4, it can also occur in purely tectonic settings (Mesimeri et al., 2019), and thus its presence alone does not imply mixed tectonic-volcanic behavior. Our interpretation of “mixed behavior” is supported by additional indicators, including magnitude ranges, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, and variability in short- and long interevent times. Traversa and Grasso (2010) showed that a Gamma distribution mainly describes volcanic seismicity, although some episodes deviate from it, while purely tectonic activity can be captured by Exponential, Gamma, or Lognormal distributions (Corral, 2006; Passarelli et al., 2015; Post et al., 2021). Our results align with both global (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Bantidi, 2022) and regional (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mesimeri et al., 2019) studies, where Lognormal distributions often provide the best description of interevent times. For sequences 5 and 6, the statistical preference for the Lognormal distribution is less clear, likely due to smaller sample sizes (Table 1), which increases uncertainty in the fits. Overall, the observed differences between down-dip and interplate coupling regions are consistent with this interpretation, with the Gamma distribution better explaining observations in the latter, likely reflecting the lower number of detected events.</p>
      <p id="d2e8113">Finally, the scaling relationship between tremor duration and magnitude for all NVT sequences exhibits substantial scatter. Although positive slope coefficients are consistently observed in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the low coefficients of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.34) indicate a weak dependence of duration on magnitude, in contrast to the more robust scaling observed for regular earthquakes. Part of this variability may be related to observational limitations, as tremors lack clear phase arrivals and their parameters (e.g., duration, magnitude, and amplitudes) are more difficult to constrain (Staudenmaier et al., 2019). However, the persistence of this scatter across all sequences, despite similar tectonic settings and depths, suggests that it is not primarily controlled by first-order structural differences. Instead, this weak scaling likely reflects the complex and heterogeneous nature of tremor generation. Consistent with previous studies (Schwartz and Rokosky, 2007), this behavior suggests that tremor duration and magnitude may be governed by partially independent processes, highlighting that NVT does not follow simple earthquake-like scaling relationships. Although the relationship between slow earthquakes and tectonic tremors is not fully understood, there is evidence that NVTs are modulated by slow dislocations on the plate interface (Villafuerte and Cruz-Atienza, 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e8166">We investigated the statistical features of reported NVT sequences along the Mexican subduction zone, analyzing the Gutenberg-Richter relation, non-extensive statistics, and multifractal behavior of magnitude and interevent time series. The estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values range from 1.25 to 2.42, consistent with previous reports worldwide, with the highest values observed in down-dip regions. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values are lower in these regions compared to coastal areas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), in agreement with the inverse relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> proposed in previous studies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Although quantitative differences exist, both approaches consistently indicate that higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values correspond to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values. Both magnitude and interevent-time series exhibit multifractal behavior, similar to tectonic earthquakes. Our results show that the origin of this multifractality is not uniform across sequences, but rather arises from a combination of mechanisms whose relative importance varies. In several cases, the observed behavior is consistent with apparent multifractality associated with broad probability distributions, whereas in others, statistically significant deviations from surrogate data indicate contributions from long-range correlations and possible nonlinear dynamics. Overall, the results suggest that no single mechanism dominates and that the multifractal properties reflect the heterogeneous temporal organization of the sequences.</p>
      <p id="d2e8263">Most NVT sequences are well described by a Lognormal model, while a few are better fitted by a Gamma distribution. Although lognormal fits are common, they can also occur in purely tectonic settings; therefore, their presence alone does not imply mixed tectonic-volcanic behavior. Evidence from magnitude ranges, multifractal parameters, and interevent-time variability supports the interpretation of mixed statistical characteristics. These findings highlight the complex temporal patterns of NVT sequences and differences in clustering across regions. The relationship between tremor duration and magnitude, however, shows substantial scatter, resulting in weak scaling with low coefficients of determination. While positive scaling coefficients are consistently observed, their magnitudes remain poor predictors of tremor duration. Part of this variability may reflect observational uncertainties, as tremor signals lack clear phase arrivals and their parameters are difficult to constrain. Nevertheless, the persistence of this behavior across all sequences, despite similar tectonic settings and depths, suggests that first-order structural differences do not primarily control it. Rather, the weak correlation likely reflects the complex, heterogeneous nature of tremor generation, in which partially independent or multiscale processes may govern duration and magnitude.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8270">Estimations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value were performed with the Python code Calc_gr_ks (<uri>https://github.com/nadavwetzler/b-value</uri>, Wetzler, 2022). We calculate the interevent-time distributions with the code qks_statistics (<uri>https://github.com/mmesim/qks_statistics</uri>, Mesimeri, 2021). The MFDMA method was implemented with the code GFGU_MFDMA_1D (Gu and Zhou, 2010). MATLAB Chaotic Systems Toolbox for implementing shuffle and IAAFT surrogate time series are available at <uri>https://github.com/nmitrou/Simulations/tree/master/matlab_codes</uri> (Leontitsis, 2001). Linear regressions for NVT duration scaling relations were determined with the SciPy library (Virtanen et al., 2020). Some figures were produced with Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) (Wessel et al., 2019). In all cases, last access: September 2025.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8292">NVT catalogs for sequences 1 to 3 were taken from the World Tremor Database (<uri>http://www-solid.eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~idehara/wtd0/Welcome.html</uri> (last access: September 2025), Ide, 2012; Idehara et al., 2014). Catalogs for sequences 4, 5, and 6 were obtained from Husker et al. (2019), Plata-Martínez et al. (2021), and Chen et al. (2025), respectively. In all cases, last access: September 2025.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8301">Conceptualization: QRP. Data analysis: QRP, VHMR, FRZ. Writing and discussion of the manuscript: QRP, VHMR, FRZ.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8307">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8313">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8319">QRP was supported by the Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI) (project 7197). Partial support from the UNAM-PAPIIT IG101426 project is gratefully acknowledged.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e8327">This paper was edited by Irene Bianchi and reviewed by Eleftheria Papadimitriou and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aki, K.: Maximum likelihood estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the formula <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its confidence limits, B. Earthq. Res. I. Tokyo, 43, 237–239, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alam, A., Nikolopoulos, D., Cantzos, D., Tahir, M., Iqbal, T., Petraki, E., and Rafique, M.: Regional multifractal variability of overall seismic activity in Pakistan from 1820 to 2020 via the application of MDFA on earthquake catalogs, Fractal and Fractional, 7, 857, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7120857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/fractalfract7120857</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bantidi, T. M.: Inter-occurrence time statistics of successive large earthquakes: analyses of the global CMT dataset, Acta Geophys., 70, 2603–2619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00908-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11600-022-00908-2</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bostock, M. G., Thomas, A. M., Savard, G., Chuang, L., and Rubin, A. M.: Magnitudes and moment-duration scaling of low-frequency earthquakes beneath southern Vancouver Island, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 6329–6350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JB012195</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brudzinski, M. R., Hinojosa-Prieto, H. R., Schlanser, K. M., Cabral-Cano, E., Arciniega-Ceballos, A., Diaz-Molina, O., and DeMets, C.: Nonvolcanic tremor along the Oaxaca segment of the Middle America subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B00A23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JB006061</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C.-C., Lee, Y.-T., and Chang, Y.-F.: A relationship between Hurst exponents of slip and waiting time data of earthquakes, Physica A, 387, 4643–4648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.063</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Ito, Y., Plata-Martinez, R., Dominguez, L. A., Ohyanagi, S., Garcia, E. S., Flores, K., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Shinohara, M., and Yamashita., Y.: New insight into slow earthquake activities from continuous ocean bottom seismometers at the Guerrero seismic gap, Mexico, Geophys. J. Int., 241, 511–525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggaf057</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cisternas, A., Polat, O., and Rivera, L.: The Marmara Sea region: Seismic behaviour in time and the likelihood of another large earthquake near Istanbul (Turkey), J. Seismol., 8, 427–437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOSE.0000038451.04626.18" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:JOSE.0000038451.04626.18</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Corral, A.: Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history, Tectonophysics, 424, 177–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.035</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Husker, A., Legrand, D., Caballero, E., and Kostoglodov, V.: Nonvolcanic tremor locations and mechanisms in Guerrero, Mexico, from energy-based and particle motion polarization analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 275–289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JB011389</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Davidsen, J. and Kwiatek, G.: Earthquake interevent time distribution for induced micro-, nano-, and picoseismicity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.068501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.068501</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>De Freitas, D. B. and De Medeiros, J. R.: Nonextensivity in the solar magnetic activity during the increasing phase of the solar cycle 23, EPL-Europhys. Lett., 88, 19001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/88/19001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1209/0295-5075/88/19001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>De Freitas, D. B. and França, G. S.: Analyzing the intrinsic multifractal nature of seismic sequences distributed along the Pacific Ring of Fire, EPL-Europhys. Lett., 146, 60002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ad5101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1209/0295-5075/ad5101</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>De Freitas, D. B., França, G. S., Scherrer, T. M., Vilar, C. S., and Silva, R.: Nonextensive triplet in a geological faults system, EPL-Europhys. Lett., 102, 39001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/102/39001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1209/0295-5075/102/39001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>DeMets, C., Gordon, R., Argus, D., and Stein, S.: Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2191–2194,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL02118</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gallego, A., Russo, R. M., Comte, D., Mocanu, V., Murdie, R. E., and VanDecat, J. C.: Tidal modulation of continuous nonvolcanic seismic tremor in the Chile triple junction region, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 14, 851–863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ggge.20091</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gkarlaouni, C., Lasocki, S., Papadimitriou, E., and George, T.: Hurst analysis of seismicity in Corinth rift and Mygdonia graben (Greece), Chaos Soliton. Fract., 96, 30–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chaos.2017.01.001</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gomberg, J., Wech, A., Creager, K., Obara, K., and Agnew, D.: Reconsidering earthquake scaling. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6243–6251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069967" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069967</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gomberg, J., Agnew, D. C., and Schwartz, S. Y.: Alternative source models of very low frequency events, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 6722–6740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JB013001</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gu, G-F. and Zhou, W-X.: Detrend moving average algorithm for multifractals, Phys. Rev. E, 82, 011136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011136</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F.: Frequency of earthquakes in California, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/BSSA0340040185</ext-link>, 1944.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hampson, K. M. and Mallen, E. A. H.: Multifractal nature of ocular aberration dynamics of the human eye, Biomed. Opt. Express, 2, 464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.000464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/BOE.2.000464</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hayes, G. P., Wald, D. J., and Johnson, R. L.: Slab1.0: a three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B01302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008524</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Henderson, J., Main, I. G., Pearce, R. G., and Takeya, M.: Seismicity in north-eastern Brazil – Fractal clustering and the evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 217–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02138.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02138.x</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Husker, A., Frank, W. B., Gonzalez, G., Avila, L., Kostoglodov, V., and Kazachkina, E.: Characteristic tectonic tremor activity observed over multiple slow slip cycles in the Mexican subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 599–608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JB016517</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Ide, S.: Variety and spatial heterogeneity of tectonic tremor worldwide, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B03302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008840</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Idehara, K., Yabe, S., and Ide, S.: Regional and global variations in the temporal clustering of tectonic tremor activity, Earth Planets Space, 66, 66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-66" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1880-5981-66-66</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Ihlen, E. A. F.: Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab, Front. Physiol., 3, 141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fphys.2012.00141</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jiang Z.-Q., Xie, W.-J., Zhou, W.-X., and Sornette, D.: Multifractal analysis of financial markets, Rep. Prog. Phys., 82, 125901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab42fb" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1361-6633/ab42fb</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kantelhardt, J. W.: Fractal and multifractal time series, in: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, edited by: Meyers, R., Springer, New York, NY, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_221</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kantelhardt, J. W., Zschiegner, S. A., Koscielny-Bunde, E., Havlin, S., Bunde, A., and Stanley, H. E.: Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series, Physica A, 316, 87–114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kao, H., Wang, K., Dragert, H., Kao, J. Y., and Rogers, G.: Estimating seismic moment magnitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of tremor bursts in northern Cascadia: Implications for the “seismic efficiency” of episodic tremor and slip, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L19306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL044927</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Lay, T. and Wallace, T.: Modern global seismology, ISBN: 012732870X, 521 pp., 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Leontitsis, A.: Chaotic Systems Toolbox, GitHub [code], <uri>https://github.com/nmitrou/Simulations/tree/master/matlab_codes</uri> (last access: September 2025), 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Mesimeri, M.: Qks_statistics: Utils for earthquake statistics, GitHub [code], <uri>https://github.com/mmesim/qks_statistics</uri> (last access:  September 2025), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Mesimeri, M., Karakostas, V., Papadimitriou, E., and Tsaklidis, G.: Characteristics of earthquake clusters: Application to western Corinth Gulf (Greece), Tectonophysics, 767, 228160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228160</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Michas, G., Sammonds, P., and Vallianatos, F.: Dynamic multifractality in earthquakes time series: insights from Corinth Rift, Greece, Pure Appl. Geophys., 172, 1909–1921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0875-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-014-0875-y</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Miyazawa, M. and Mori, J.: Detection of triggered deep low-frequency events from the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L10307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022539</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Mogi, K.: Some discussions on aftershocks, foreshocks and earthquake swarms: The fracture of a semi-infinite body caused by an inner stress origin and its relation to the earthquake phenomena, B. Earthq. Res. Inst., 41, 615–658, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Monterrubio-Velasco, M., Lana, X., Martínez, M. D., Zúñiga, F. R., and Puente, J. D. L.: Evolution of the multifractal parameters along different steps of a seismic activity. The example of Canterbury 2000–2018 (New Zealand), AIP Adv., 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/5.0010103</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Nadeau, R. M. and Dolenc, D.: Nonvolcanic tremors deep beneath the San Andreas Fault, Science, 307, 389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1107142</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Nishikawa, T. and Ide, S.: Earthquake size distribution in subduction zones linked to slab buoyancy, Nat. Geosci., 7, 904–908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2279</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Obara, K.: Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in southwest Japan, Science, 296, 1679–1681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1070378</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Pardo, M. and Suárez, G.: Shape of the subducted Rivera and Cocos plates in southern Mexico: Seismic and tectonic implications, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12357–12373, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB00919" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JB00919</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Passarelli, L., Hainzl, S., Cesca S., Maccaferri, F., Mucciarelli, M., Roessler, D., Corbi, F., and Dahm, T.: Aseismic transient driving the swarm-like seismic sequence in the Pollino range, Southern Italy, Geophys. J. Int., 201, 1553–1567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggv111</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Payero, J. S., Kostoglodov, V., Shapiro, N., Mikumo, T., Iglesias, A., Pérez-Campos, X., and Clayton, R. W.: Nonvolcanic tremor observed in the Mexican subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032877</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Peacock, S. M.: Thermal and metamorphic environment of subduction zone episodic tremor and slip, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B00A07, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JB005978</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Campos, X., Kim, Y. H., Husker, A., Davis, P. M., Clayton, R. W., Iglesias, A., Pacheco, J. F., Singh, S. K., Manea, V. C., and Gurnis, M.: Horizontal subduction and truncation of the Cocos Plate beneath central Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L18303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035127</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Plata-Martinez, R., Ide, S., Shinohara, M., Garcia, E. S., Mizuno, N., Dominguez, L. A., Taira, T., Yamashita, Y., Toh, A., Yamada, T., Real, J., Husker, A., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., and Ito, Y.: Shallow slow earthquakes to decipher future catastrophic earthquakes in the Guerrero seismic gap, Nat. Commun., 12, 3976, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24210-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-24210-9</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Post, R. A. J., Michels, M. A. J., Ampuero, J.-P., Candela, T., Fokker, P. A., Van Wees, J.-D., Van der Hofstad, R. W., and Van den Heuvel, E. R.: Interevent time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity, Sci. Rep., 11, 3540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Rabbel, W., Thorwart, M. M., and Taylor, W.: Non-volcanic tremor in Costa Rica: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values, moment release and tidal modulation, AGU Fall Meeting 2011, Online, 5–9 December 2011, S23B-2245, <uri>https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFM.S23B2245R/abstract</uri> (last access: September 2025), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Rogers, G. and Dragert, H.: Episodic tremor and slip on the Cascadia subduction zone: the chatter of silent slip, Science, 300, 1942–19443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1084783</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Rubinstein, J. L., Vidale, J. E., Gomberg, J., Bodin, P., Creager, K. C., and Malone, S. D.: Non-volcanic tremor driven by large transient shear stresses, Nature, 448, 579–582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06017</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Saichev, A. and Sornette, D.: Generic multifractality in exponentials of long memory processes, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 011111,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011111</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Varotsos, P. A.: Nonextensivity and natural time: the case of seismicity, Phys. Rev. E, 82, 021110,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021110</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Scherrer, T. M., França, G. S., Silva, R., de Freitas, D. B., and Vilar, C. S.: Nonextensivity at the Circum-Pacific subduction zones – Preliminary studies, Physica A, 426, 63–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.038</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Scholz, C. H.: On the stress dependence of the earthquake <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1399–1402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062863" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062863</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S., and Wyss, M.: Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes, Nature, 437, 539–542, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04094</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.: Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 635–638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.: Surrogate time series, Physica D, 142, 346–382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. Y. and Rokosky, J. M.: Slow slip events and seismic tremor at circum-Pacific subduction zones, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG3004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RG000208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006RG000208</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Shelly, D. R.: Migrating tremor illuminates deformation beneath the seismogenic San Andreas fault, Nature, 463, 648–652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08755</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Shelly, D. R., Beroza, G. C., Ide, S., and Nakamula, S.: Low-frequency earthquakes in Shikoku, Japan, and their relationship to episodic tremor and slip, Nature, 442, 188–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04931" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04931</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Shelly, D. R., Beroza, G. C., and Ide, S.: Non-volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake swarms, Nature, 446, 305–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature05666</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Silva, R., Franca, G. S., Vilar, C. S., and Alcaniz, J. S.: Nonextensive models for earthquakes, Phys. Rev. E, 7, 026102,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026102</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Singh, S. K. and Mortera, F.: Source time functions of large Mexican subduction earthquakes, morphology of the Benioff Zone, age of the plate, and their tectonic implications, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21487–21502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB02047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JB02047</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Sotolongo-Costa, O. and Posadas, A.: Fragment-asperity interaction model for earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 048501,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.048501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.048501</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Staudenmaier, N., Tormann, T., Edwards, B., Mignan, A., and Wiemer, S.: The frequency-size scaling of non-volcanic tremors beneath the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield: Possible implications for seismic energy release, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 516, 77–107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.006</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sweet, J. R., Creager, K. C., and Houston, H.: A family of repeating low-frequency earthquakes at the downdip edge of tremor and slip, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 15, 3713–3721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GC005449</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Tang, C.-C., Peng, Z., Chao, K., Chen, C.-H., and Lin, C.-H.: Detecting low-frequency earthquakes within non-volcanic tremor in southern Taiwan triggered by the 2005 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.6 Nias earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L16307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL043918</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Telesca, L. and Lapenna, V.: Measuring multifractality in seismic sequences, Tectonophysics, 423, 115–123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.023</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Telesca, L., Cuomo, V., and Lapenna, V.: A new approach to investigate the correlation between geoelectrical time fluctuations and earthquakes in a seismic area of southern Italy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4375–4378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013467" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013467</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., and Farmer, J. D.: Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data, Physica D, 58, 77–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Traversa, P. and Grasso, J.-R.: How is volcano seismicity different from tectonic seismicity?, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100, 1755–1769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0120090214</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Tsallis, C.: Introduction to nonestensive statistical mechanics. Approaching a Complex World, Springer, New York, 382 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85359-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-0-387-85359-8</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Villafuerte, C. and Cruz-Atienza, V. M.: Insights into the causal relationship between slow slip and tectonic tremor in Guerrero, Mexico, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6642–6656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JB014037</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., Van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, I., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., and VanderPlas, J.: SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wada, I., Wang, K., He, J., and Hyndman, R. D.: Weakening of the subduction interface and its effects on surface heat flow, slab dehydration, and mantle wedge serpentinization, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B04402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JB005190</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Gao, X.-L., and Zhou, W.-X.: Testing for intrinsic multifractality in the global grain spot market indices: a multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis, Fractals, 31, 2350090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S0218348X23500901</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Warren, N. W. and Latham, G. V.: An experimental study of thermally induced microfracturing and its relation to volcanic seismicity, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4455–4464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i023p04455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB075i023p04455</ext-link>, 1970. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Wessel, P., Luis, J. F., Uieda, L. A., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H., and Tian, D.: The generic mapping tools version 6, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 5556–5564, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GC008515</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Wetzler, N.: Calc_gr_ks.py: A program to calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value Gutenberg-Richter magnitude distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, GitHub [code], <uri>https://github.com/nadavwetzler/b-value</uri>  (last access: September 2025), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Woessner, J. and Wiemer, S.: Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and Its uncertainty, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95, 684–698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0120040007</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Yoshioka, S., Toda, M., and Nakajima, J.: Regionality of deep low-frequency earthquakes associated with subduction of the Philippine Sea plate along the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 272, 189–198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.039</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Statistical characteristics of non-volcanic tremor distributions along the Mexican Subduction Zone</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Aki, K.:
Maximum likelihood estimate of <i>b</i> in the formula <i>log</i><i>N</i> = <i>a</i> − <i>b</i><i>M</i> and its confidence limits, B. Earthq. Res. I. Tokyo, 43, 237–239, 1965.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Alam, A., Nikolopoulos, D., Cantzos, D., Tahir, M., Iqbal, T., Petraki, E., and Rafique, M.:
Regional multifractal variability of overall seismic activity in Pakistan from 1820 to 2020 via the application of MDFA on earthquake catalogs, Fractal and Fractional, 7, 857, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7120857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7120857</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Bantidi, T. M.:
Inter-occurrence time statistics of successive large earthquakes: analyses of the global CMT dataset, Acta Geophys., 70, 2603–2619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00908-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00908-2</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Bostock, M. G., Thomas, A. M., Savard, G., Chuang, L., and Rubin, A. M.:
Magnitudes and moment-duration scaling of low-frequency earthquakes beneath southern Vancouver Island, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 6329–6350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012195" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012195</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Brudzinski, M. R., Hinojosa-Prieto, H. R., Schlanser, K. M., Cabral-Cano, E., Arciniega-Ceballos, A., Diaz-Molina, O., and DeMets, C.:
Nonvolcanic tremor along the Oaxaca segment of the Middle America subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B00A23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006061</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, C.-C., Lee, Y.-T., and Chang, Y.-F.:
A relationship between Hurst exponents of slip and waiting time data of earthquakes, Physica A, 387, 4643–4648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.063</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, Y., Ito, Y., Plata-Martinez, R., Dominguez, L. A., Ohyanagi, S., Garcia, E. S., Flores, K., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Shinohara, M., and Yamashita., Y.:
New insight into slow earthquake activities from continuous ocean bottom seismometers at the Guerrero seismic gap, Mexico, Geophys. J. Int., 241, 511–525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf057</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Cisternas, A., Polat, O., and Rivera, L.:
The Marmara Sea region: Seismic behaviour in time and the likelihood of another large earthquake near Istanbul (Turkey), J. Seismol., 8, 427–437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOSE.0000038451.04626.18" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOSE.0000038451.04626.18</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Corral, A.:
Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history, Tectonophysics, 424, 177–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.035</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Husker, A., Legrand, D., Caballero, E., and Kostoglodov, V.:
Nonvolcanic tremor locations and mechanisms in Guerrero, Mexico, from energy-based and particle motion polarization analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 275–289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011389</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Davidsen, J. and Kwiatek, G.:
Earthquake interevent time distribution for induced micro-, nano-, and picoseismicity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.068501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.068501</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       De Freitas, D. B. and De Medeiros, J. R.:
Nonextensivity in the solar magnetic activity during the increasing phase of the solar cycle 23, EPL-Europhys. Lett., 88, 19001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/88/19001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/88/19001</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       De Freitas, D. B. and França, G. S.:
Analyzing the intrinsic multifractal nature of seismic sequences distributed along the Pacific Ring of Fire, EPL-Europhys. Lett., 146, 60002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ad5101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ad5101</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       De Freitas, D. B., França, G. S., Scherrer, T. M., Vilar, C. S., and Silva, R.:
Nonextensive triplet in a geological faults system, EPL-Europhys. Lett., 102, 39001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/102/39001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/102/39001</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       DeMets, C., Gordon, R., Argus, D., and Stein, S.:
Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2191–2194,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02118</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Gallego, A., Russo, R. M., Comte, D., Mocanu, V., Murdie, R. E., and VanDecat, J. C.:
Tidal modulation of continuous nonvolcanic seismic tremor in the Chile triple junction region, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 14, 851–863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20091</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Gkarlaouni, C., Lasocki, S., Papadimitriou, E., and George, T.:
Hurst analysis of seismicity in Corinth rift and Mygdonia graben (Greece), Chaos Soliton. Fract., 96, 30–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2017.01.001</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Gomberg, J., Wech, A., Creager, K., Obara, K., and Agnew, D.:
Reconsidering earthquake scaling. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6243–6251, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069967" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069967</a>, 2016a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Gomberg, J., Agnew, D. C., and Schwartz, S. Y.:
Alternative source models of very low frequency events, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 6722–6740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013001</a>, 2016b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Gu, G-F. and Zhou, W-X.:
Detrend moving average algorithm for multifractals, Phys. Rev. E, 82, 011136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011136</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F.:
Frequency of earthquakes in California, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185</a>, 1944.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Hampson, K. M. and Mallen, E. A. H.:
Multifractal nature of ocular aberration dynamics of the human eye, Biomed. Opt. Express, 2, 464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.000464" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.000464</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Hayes, G. P., Wald, D. J., and Johnson, R. L.:
Slab1.0: a three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B01302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008524</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Henderson, J., Main, I. G., Pearce, R. G., and Takeya, M.:
Seismicity in north-eastern Brazil – Fractal clustering and the evolution of the <i>b</i>-value, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 217–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02138.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb02138.x</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Husker, A., Frank, W. B., Gonzalez, G., Avila, L., Kostoglodov, V., and Kazachkina, E.:
Characteristic tectonic tremor activity observed over multiple slow slip cycles in the Mexican subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 599–608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016517</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Ide, S.:
Variety and spatial heterogeneity of tectonic tremor worldwide, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B03302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008840</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Idehara, K., Yabe, S., and Ide, S.:
Regional and global variations in the temporal clustering of tectonic tremor activity, Earth Planets Space, 66, 66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-66" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-66</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Ihlen, E. A. F.:
Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab, Front. Physiol., 3, 141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00141</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Jiang Z.-Q., Xie, W.-J., Zhou, W.-X., and Sornette, D.:
Multifractal analysis of financial markets, Rep. Prog. Phys., 82, 125901, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab42fb" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab42fb</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Kantelhardt, J. W.:
Fractal and multifractal time series, in: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, edited by: Meyers, R., Springer, New York, NY, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_221</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Kantelhardt, J. W., Zschiegner, S. A., Koscielny-Bunde, E., Havlin, S., Bunde, A., and Stanley, H. E.:
Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series, Physica A, 316, 87–114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Kao, H., Wang, K., Dragert, H., Kao, J. Y., and Rogers, G.:
Estimating seismic moment magnitude (<i>M</i><sub>W</sub>) of tremor bursts in northern Cascadia: Implications for the “seismic efficiency” of episodic tremor and slip, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L19306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044927" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044927</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Lay, T. and Wallace, T.:
Modern global seismology, ISBN: 012732870X, 521 pp., 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Leontitsis, A.:
Chaotic Systems Toolbox, GitHub [code], <a href="https://github.com/nmitrou/Simulations/tree/master/matlab_codes" target="_blank"/> (last access: September 2025), 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Mesimeri, M.:
Qks_statistics: Utils for earthquake statistics, GitHub [code], <a href="https://github.com/mmesim/qks_statistics" target="_blank"/> (last access:  September 2025), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Mesimeri, M., Karakostas, V., Papadimitriou, E., and Tsaklidis, G.:
Characteristics of earthquake clusters: Application to western Corinth Gulf (Greece), Tectonophysics, 767, 228160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228160</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Michas, G., Sammonds, P., and Vallianatos, F.:
Dynamic multifractality in earthquakes time series: insights from Corinth Rift, Greece, Pure Appl. Geophys., 172, 1909–1921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0875-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0875-y</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Miyazawa, M. and Mori, J.:
Detection of triggered deep low-frequency events from the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L10307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022539</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Mogi, K.:
Some discussions on aftershocks, foreshocks and earthquake swarms: The fracture of a semi-infinite body caused by an inner stress origin and its relation to the earthquake phenomena, B. Earthq. Res. Inst., 41, 615–658, 1963.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Monterrubio-Velasco, M., Lana, X., Martínez, M. D., Zúñiga, F. R., and Puente, J. D. L.:
Evolution of the multifractal parameters along different steps of a seismic activity. The example of Canterbury 2000–2018 (New Zealand), AIP Adv., 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010103</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Nadeau, R. M. and Dolenc, D.:
Nonvolcanic tremors deep beneath the San Andreas Fault, Science, 307, 389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107142</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Nishikawa, T. and Ide, S.:
Earthquake size distribution in subduction zones linked to slab buoyancy, Nat. Geosci., 7, 904–908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2279</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Obara, K.:
Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in southwest Japan, Science, 296, 1679–1681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070378</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Pardo, M. and Suárez, G.:
Shape of the subducted Rivera and Cocos plates in southern Mexico: Seismic and tectonic implications, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12357–12373, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB00919" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB00919</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Passarelli, L., Hainzl, S., Cesca S., Maccaferri, F., Mucciarelli, M., Roessler, D., Corbi, F., and Dahm, T.:
Aseismic transient driving the swarm-like seismic sequence in the Pollino range, Southern Italy, Geophys. J. Int., 201, 1553–1567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv111</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Payero, J. S., Kostoglodov, V., Shapiro, N., Mikumo, T., Iglesias, A., Pérez-Campos, X., and Clayton, R. W.:
Nonvolcanic tremor observed in the Mexican subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032877</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Peacock, S. M.:
Thermal and metamorphic environment of subduction zone episodic tremor and slip, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B00A07, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005978</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Pérez-Campos, X., Kim, Y. H., Husker, A., Davis, P. M., Clayton, R. W., Iglesias, A., Pacheco, J. F., Singh, S. K., Manea, V. C., and Gurnis, M.:
Horizontal subduction and truncation of the Cocos Plate beneath central Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L18303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035127</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Plata-Martinez, R., Ide, S., Shinohara, M., Garcia, E. S., Mizuno, N., Dominguez, L. A., Taira, T., Yamashita, Y., Toh, A., Yamada, T., Real, J., Husker, A., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., and Ito, Y.:
Shallow slow earthquakes to decipher future catastrophic earthquakes in the Guerrero seismic gap, Nat. Commun., 12, 3976, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24210-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24210-9</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Post, R. A. J., Michels, M. A. J., Ampuero, J.-P., Candela, T., Fokker, P. A., Van Wees, J.-D., Van der Hofstad, R. W., and Van den Heuvel, E. R.:
Interevent time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity, Sci. Rep., 11, 3540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Rabbel, W., Thorwart, M. M., and Taylor, W.:
Non-volcanic tremor in Costa Rica: <i>b</i>-values, moment release and tidal modulation, AGU Fall Meeting 2011, Online, 5–9 December 2011, S23B-2245, <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFM.S23B2245R/abstract" target="_blank"/> (last access: September 2025), 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Rogers, G. and Dragert, H.:
Episodic tremor and slip on the Cascadia subduction zone: the chatter of silent slip, Science, 300, 1942–19443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084783</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Rubinstein, J. L., Vidale, J. E., Gomberg, J., Bodin, P., Creager, K. C., and Malone, S. D.:
Non-volcanic tremor driven by large transient shear stresses, Nature, 448, 579–582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06017</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Saichev, A. and Sornette, D.:
Generic multifractality in exponentials of long memory processes, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 011111,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011111</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Varotsos, P. A.:
Nonextensivity and natural time: the case of seismicity, Phys. Rev. E, 82, 021110,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021110</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Scherrer, T. M., França, G. S., Silva, R., de Freitas, D. B., and Vilar, C. S.:
Nonextensivity at the Circum-Pacific subduction zones – Preliminary studies, Physica A, 426, 63–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.038</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Scholz, C. H.:
On the stress dependence of the earthquake <i>b</i>-value, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1399–1402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062863" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062863</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S., and Wyss, M.:
Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes, Nature, 437, 539–542, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.:
Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 635–638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.635</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.:
Surrogate time series, Physica D, 142, 346–382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Schwartz, S. Y. and Rokosky, J. M.:
Slow slip events and seismic tremor at circum-Pacific subduction zones, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG3004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RG000208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RG000208</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Shelly, D. R.:
Migrating tremor illuminates deformation beneath the seismogenic San Andreas fault, Nature, 463, 648–652, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08755</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Shelly, D. R., Beroza, G. C., Ide, S., and Nakamula, S.:
Low-frequency earthquakes in Shikoku, Japan, and their relationship to episodic tremor and slip, Nature, 442, 188–191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04931" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04931</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Shelly, D. R., Beroza, G. C., and Ide, S.:
Non-volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake swarms, Nature, 446, 305–307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05666" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05666</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Silva, R., Franca, G. S., Vilar, C. S., and Alcaniz, J. S.:
Nonextensive models for earthquakes, Phys. Rev. E, 7, 026102,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026102</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Singh, S. K. and Mortera, F.:
Source time functions of large Mexican subduction earthquakes, morphology of the Benioff Zone, age of the plate, and their tectonic implications, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21487–21502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB02047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB02047</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Sotolongo-Costa, O. and Posadas, A.:
Fragment-asperity interaction model for earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 048501,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.048501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.048501</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Staudenmaier, N., Tormann, T., Edwards, B., Mignan, A., and Wiemer, S.:
The frequency-size scaling of non-volcanic tremors beneath the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield: Possible implications for seismic energy release, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 516, 77–107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.006</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Sweet, J. R., Creager, K. C., and Houston, H.:
A family of repeating low-frequency earthquakes at the downdip edge of tremor and slip, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 15, 3713–3721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005449</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Tang, C.-C., Peng, Z., Chao, K., Chen, C.-H., and Lin, C.-H.:
Detecting low-frequency earthquakes within non-volcanic tremor in southern Taiwan triggered by the 2005 <i>M</i><sub>W</sub>&thinsp;8.6 Nias earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L16307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043918" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043918</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Telesca, L. and Lapenna, V.:
Measuring multifractality in seismic sequences, Tectonophysics, 423, 115–123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.023</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       Telesca, L., Cuomo, V., and Lapenna, V.:
A new approach to investigate the correlation between geoelectrical time fluctuations and earthquakes in a seismic area of southern Italy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4375–4378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013467" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013467</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., and Farmer, J. D.:
Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data, Physica D, 58, 77–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Traversa, P. and Grasso, J.-R.:
How is volcano seismicity different from tectonic seismicity?, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100, 1755–1769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090214</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Tsallis, C.:
Introduction to nonestensive statistical mechanics. Approaching a Complex World, Springer, New York, 382 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85359-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85359-8</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Villafuerte, C. and Cruz-Atienza, V. M.:
Insights into the causal relationship between slow slip and tectonic tremor in Guerrero, Mexico, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6642–6656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014037</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., Van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, I., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., and VanderPlas, J.:
SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Wada, I., Wang, K., He, J., and Hyndman, R. D.:
Weakening of the subduction interface and its effects on surface heat flow, slab dehydration, and mantle wedge serpentinization, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B04402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005190" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005190</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, L., Gao, X.-L., and Zhou, W.-X.:
Testing for intrinsic multifractality in the global grain spot market indices: a multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis, Fractals, 31, 2350090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500901</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
       Warren, N. W. and Latham, G. V.:
An experimental study of thermally induced microfracturing and its relation to volcanic seismicity, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4455–4464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i023p04455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i023p04455</a>, 1970.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
       Wessel, P., Luis, J. F., Uieda, L. A., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H., and Tian, D.:
The generic mapping tools version 6, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 5556–5564, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Wetzler, N.:
Calc_gr_ks.py: A program to calculate the <i>b</i>-value Gutenberg-Richter magnitude distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, GitHub [code], <a href="https://github.com/nadavwetzler/b-value" target="_blank"/>  (last access: September 2025), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Woessner, J. and Wiemer, S.:
Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and Its uncertainty, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95, 684–698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040007</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
       Yoshioka, S., Toda, M., and Nakajima, J.:
Regionality of deep low-frequency earthquakes associated with subduction of the Philippine Sea plate along the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 272, 189–198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.039</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
