<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="methods-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-17-855-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Perturbation analysis of travel-time accuracy for core phases reconstructed from seismic interferometry</article-title><alt-title>Perturbation analysis of travel-time accuracy for core phases</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Xia</surname><given-names>Yingjie</given-names></name>
          <email>xiayingjie@cdut.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Xuping</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Xiaofei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Earth Exploration &amp; Information Technology, Ministry of Education, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610059, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Deep Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration Technology,  Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yingjie Xia (xiayingjie@cdut.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>855</fpage><lpage>866</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Yingjie Xia et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e115">Correlating late coda waves from large earthquakes produces stable waveforms that approximate inter-station core phases. However, the properties of these coda waves often violate the strict assumptions underlying classical Green's function retrieval, undermining confidence in interpreting the reconstructed arrivals as true inter-station phases and limiting their utility in seismic imaging. In this study, we present a perturbation analysis of core-phase interferometry and show that accurate travel-time information can be recovered under locally uniform wave incidence along the inter-station path. We introduce a dimensionless parameter – defined as the ratio of the seismic wave period to the inter-station travel time – which establishes a critical angular threshold. Our perturbation analysis reveals that the travel-time reconstruction accuracy scales with the cube of this threshold, allowing high-precision recovery of core phases,  which naturally exhibit small threshold values due to their long propagation paths. Numerical simulations validate the theoretical predictions. By applying the proposed framework to real coda correlation data, we demonstrate that core phases can be reliably reconstructed using a sufficiently large number of global earthquakes – even without the traditionally assumed uniform source distribution. These results establish a rigorous theoretical foundation for extracting high-precision core-phase travel times from coda correlations, enhancing the reliability of seismological imaging of Earth's deep interior.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42374072</award-id>
<award-id>41790465</award-id>
<award-id>42241141</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e127">Over the past two decades, the use of ambient ground motions for imaging subsurface structures has advanced significantly. This progress is largely driven by the discovery that cross-correlating records between two stations yields waveforms with dispersion characteristics resembling those of surface waves propagating between them <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.1"/>. Commonly used ambient seismic sources include microseisms (periods 1–50 s) and the Earth's hum (periods 50–300 s), both generated by interactions between ocean waves and the solid Earth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.2"/>, as well as high-frequency anthropogenic noise (periods <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s). Dispersion measurements derived from ambient noise correlations have been extensively employed to probe Earth's interior structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e149">Beyond ambient noise, late earthquake coda waves contain substantial body wave energy that has traversed deep Earth discontinuities. Consequently, coda correlations are enriched with core-sensitive phases that generally preserve accurate slowness information <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.4"/>. The travel times of these extracted phases have been utilized to constrain the fine-scale structure of the Earth's core (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.5"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx16" id="altparen.6"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e161">Theoretically, the cross-correlation function (CCF) of noise records converges to the seismic Green's function under ideal conditions – such as a uniform distribution of noise sources enclosing the stations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.7"/> or equipartitioned wavefield energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.8"/>. However, coda waves often violate these ideal conditions, resulting in anomalously high amplitudes in reconstructed phases compared to earthquake data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.9"/>, as well as persistent features occurring at travel-time differences between conventional phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e177">It is also well established that deviations from ideal conditions can introduce travel-time biases in wavefield reconstructions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.11"/>. As a result, it is widely recognized within the coda correlation community that core phases extracted from coda waves do not exactly represent the true inter-station core phases. Their travel times have been shown to be influenced by several factors, including earthquake–station geometry, focal mechanisms, and the specific coda time window selected for correlation. Previous studies have investigated the formation mechanisms of these phases under such variable conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.12"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e187">This study aims to clarify under what realistic circumstances the travel times of coda-based core phases correspond to those of true inter-station arrivals. Such an evaluation is essential for assessing the reliability of using extracted travel times as substitutes for direct arrivals in imaging deep Earth structural anomalies. Previous theoretical treatments of noise correlations have often relied on asymptotic techniques – such as the stationary phase method – to derive approximate relationships, which inherently limits the rigor of travel-time accuracy assessments. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a perturbation-based framework to quantify potential travel-time discrepancies.</p>
      <p id="d2e190">A key feature of this approach is the decomposition of the problem into a “solvable” reference model and a “perturbation” component. We begin with a bounded homogeneous model representing the solvable part, which is then perturbed to evaluate the accuracy of travel-time reconstruction. The proposed framework is validated through numerical simulations and further demonstrated using real coda correlation data.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e195">Definition of geometrical variables for wave propagation in the homogeneous medium bounded by two discontinuous layers.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Theory</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>A Solvable Reference Model</title>
      <p id="d2e219">We consider a homogeneous medium bounded by two discontinuous surfaces to simulate wave reflections between the Earth's surface and the core–mantle boundary. The layer thickness is denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For simplicity, P–S wave conversion at the discontinuities is neglected, and the wave speed – whether for P or S waves – is represented by a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two seismic stations are positioned at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with all excitation sources placed within the surface layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). For a wave originating from a source at position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and undergoing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflections from the lower boundary before reaching station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ray path length is given by:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Similarly, the path length for a wave arriving at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after experiencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflections is

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M12" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For a wave traveling directly between the two stations after undergoing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflections, the path length is:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M14" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The spectral representation of reflected waves recorded at either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, excited by a source located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be expressed using a generalized ray formulation as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In these equations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the angular frequency, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the imaginary unit. The subscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to the three components of the displacement vector, respectively. The functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the amplitude of reflected waves. In this study, we restrict our analysis to incident angles below the critical angle; consequently, neither <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> incorporates a phase shift upon reflection and both remain real-valued.</p>
      <p id="d2e834">In practical coda correlation analysis, researchers compute cross-correlations of late coda waves generated by individual earthquake events and subsequently stack the resulting CCFs for each station pair to enhance coherent arrivals. Following this procedure, the total CCF, summed over all sources, is theoretically expressed as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the summation over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the contribution from all individual sources. The travel-time difference between the two ray paths is defined as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1156">Definition of geometric variables for the case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dashed circle and star denote the station and source mapped from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Analytical Framework</title>
      <p id="d2e1232">The travel-time difference function in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) corresponds to the difference in travel times for wave propagation in a homogeneous medium (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). In this representation, the source is located at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the two stations are positioned at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on this equivalence, we evaluate the CCF in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) within this simplified homogeneous setting.</p>
      <p id="d2e1326">Since the cases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are complex conjugate in the computation, we consider only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for simplicity. To facilitate the analysis, we apply a coordinate transformation by rotating the system about the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis so that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis passes through the imaginary station at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this rotated frame, we introduce spherical coordinates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis aligns with the reflected inter-station ray path originating from the station at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; thus, the polar angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the angular deviation of the incident wave from this ray path. Within this coordinate system, the travel-time difference function takes the form:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The final approximation holds under the condition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1701">In the CCF Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), the variable pair <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be mapped to the spherical coordinates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and similarly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To proceed, we introduce a continuous function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to represent the density of the source distribution, which encapsulates the discrete contributions governed by the indices <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This allows the double summation over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be approximated by a volume integral. Accordingly, the CCF can be rewritten as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavenumber, and

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  we assume that the wave amplitudes at the two stations maintain a constant proportionality when excited by different sources. Under this assumption, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the wave energy density within each solid angle. We further assume that this energy density is uniform across all solid angles and denote it as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, the CCF can be expressed as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic" mathsize="2.0em">{</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">]</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">]</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em" mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents upper boundary of the polar angle. We assume it is azimuthally symmetric (independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the time domain, the first term of this equation corresponds to arrivals at the travel times of the reflected waves between the two stations, where the factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a time-domain integration operator. The second term corresponds to spurious waves arising due to a uniform truncation of the polar angle at different azimuthal angles. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we consider the complex conjugate of the CCF expression in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). Following the same derivation, we obtain an equivalent expression. As a result,  these arrivals appear on the causal and anti-causal sides of the CCF, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e2588">To ensure accurate reconstruction of the reflected waves, the polar angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must be sufficiently large to prevent interference from spurious waves. This condition is met when the arrival times of the reflected and spurious wave packets are separated by at least one dominant period, corresponding to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase difference in the spectral domain. Adopting this phase difference as our non-interference criterion, we obtain the inequality:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This yields a threshold angle expression:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M73" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>arcsin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>i.e.,</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>arcsin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the period of the reflected wave, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the travel time of the inter-station wave after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflections. To ensure accurate wave reconstruction, this result defines the minimum angular range required for locally uniform illumination.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Perturbation Analysis for Realistic Coda Correlations</title>
      <p id="d2e2762">The derivation above assumes a cosine distribution for the travel time difference function, which depends on wave propagation taking place within a bounded homogeneous medium. In practice, this condition is not satisfied. Furthermore, late earthquake coda correlations also involve P-to-S wave conversions. Under these circumstances, the actual travel time difference function deviates from the cosine form. To accommodate such deviations, we express the perturbed travel time differences as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M77" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> now represents the travel time along curved ray paths between the two stations after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reflections, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the polar angle between the incident wave direction and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis (where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is aligned with the direction of the inter-station wave incidence at the station), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> captures deviations from the idealized cosine distribution. Our analysis assumes azimuthal symmetry (i.e., independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)  and ignores the dependence on travel distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for simplicity. The formalism can be readily extended to incorporate such dependencies by performing the analysis over discrete values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2915">Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the inter-station ray path, the travel time difference at this angle attains its extreme value. We impose:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mtext> and </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the superscript <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th derivative with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Expanding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  in a Taylor series around  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the travel time difference becomes:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the second line follows from substituting the Taylor expansion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3382">Truncating the series at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> term and substitute into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) (assuming that the polar angle is truncated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, beyond which wave construction is not affected) yields:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M99" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em" mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">[</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">]</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo mathvariant="italic" mathsize="2.0em">}</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This result shows that the correlation still yields waves at the travel times of the reflected waves when truncating the series of the deviation function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We adopt, as before, our non-interference criterion for the phase difference. This leads to the condition:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          We obtain a threshold angle expression:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>arcsin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The second derivative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affects the polar angle range over which the wavefield needs to be locally uniform. If we neglect its impact in this equality,  the expression reduces to equality (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e4140">Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>) demonstrates that  time errors due to deviations from the cosine distribution arise from higher-order terms  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and beyond) in the Taylor series expansion of the travel time difference function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We estimate the time error as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><label>19</label><mml:math id="M107" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which scales proportionally to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the reconstruction of core phases, such as the ScS wave with a period of 50 s and a travel time of 1000 s, the threshold angle is:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E20" content-type="numbered"><label>20</label><mml:math id="M109" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>arcsin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Converting this angle to radians and substituting into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E19"/>) yields a time variation on the order of:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><label>21</label><mml:math id="M110" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Consequently, if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smooth near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., its derivatives are small), the resulting time deviation is negligible. This result demonstrates that the core phases can be accurately reconstructed via coda correlation under the assumption of locally uniform illumination.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Contribution of Earthquakes Deviating from the Two-Station Plane</title>
      <p id="d2e4432">Based on the definition of the threshold angle, we evaluate how earthquakes located outside the inter-station plane affect the condition of locally uniform illumination. To quantify the influence of late coda correlations propagating off-plane, we introduce the following geometric parameter:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><label>22</label><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the incidence angle of the inter-station phase. This parameter captures the relationship between the critical angular range required for stable reconstruction and the inherent propagation direction of the target phase.</p>
      <p id="d2e4469">When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the maximum permissible deviation is governed by:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E23" content-type="numbered"><label>23</label><mml:math id="M117" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arcsin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the azimuthal angle between the earthquake-station plane and the inter-station plane, representing the deviation of the source from the great-circle path (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a). Late coda waves propagating along planes with a deviation angle exceeding this threshold fall outside the stable angular range; consequently, they do not contribute to the stable recovery of travel times.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4530">Relationship between the threshold angle and the deviation angle: <bold>(a)</bold> when the threshold angle is less than the wave incident angle, and <bold>(b)</bold> when the threshold angle exceeds it. In both cases, the gray line denotes the trajectory of the inter-station ray path, whereas the shaded region illustrates the area encompassed within the stable angular range.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4546">In contrast, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), even coda waves radiated from earthquakes in a plane perpendicular to the inter-station plane fall within the stable angular range defined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b). In this regime, a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> implies a smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the late coda waves radiated in these deviated planes align more closely with the target inter-station ray path. Consequently, for a given core phase, a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value leads to a tighter convergence of correlation signals across different deviation planes within the selected time window.</p>
      <p id="d2e4622">Core phases retrieved from late coda correlations are characterized by steep incidence angles, which typically yield relatively large values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. To illustrate this effect, we compare two representative core phases at an inter-station distance of 10.0°:</p>
      <p id="d2e4632"><italic>ScS wave</italic>. Travel time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s, threshold angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, and incidence angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4686"><italic>PKIKP<sup>2</sup> wave</italic>. Travel time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s, threshold angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and incidence angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4745">The significantly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that its reconstructed waveform exhibits greater convergence across diverse deviation planes compared to the ScS phase. This comparison demonstrates that for phases with steep incidence angles, contributions from earthquakes at all deviation angles must be accounted for. In such cases, even sources located far from the great-circle path can contribute constructively to the correlation signal, facilitating the robust reconstruction of deep-earth phases.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4769">The computations of the CCF under three truncation angles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Numerical Simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e4787">We perform a numerical computation to investigate the impact of wave correlation under locally uniform illumination. In the computation, we set the travel time of the reflected wave to 1000 s and wave correlation in the period range of 20–50 s. Then, we obtain the threshold angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° as in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E20"/>), corresponding to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase shift relative to the reflected wave. We also compute truncation angles for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase shifts, obtaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°, respectively. These truncation angles are used as upper bounds in the integral of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>). For comparison, we compute the accurate arrival of the reflected wave using an upper bound of 180°. The results show: Within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase shift, the reconstructed reflected wave and truncation-induced spurious wave interfere, causing phase deviation in the reconstructed reflected wave. Within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase shift, the two waves align, allowing accurate recovery of the reflected wave's travel time. Within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase shift, the waves diverge, and the reconstructed reflected wave remains unaffected by integration truncation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). This supports the rationality of  our non-interference criterion that uses a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase shift to determine the threshold angle.</p>
      <p id="d2e4907">Given the small threshold angle in our simulation, we further examine correlation under a non-cosine travel-time difference distribution by setting the disturbance term in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) as

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E24" content-type="numbered"><label>24</label><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        This function and its first derivative satisfy the constraints in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>). Integrating over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and comparing the reconstructed wave with that from a cosine travel-time difference distribution, we find nearly identical phase information (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). This demonstrates high reconstruction accuracy for travel times even under non-cosine travel-time difference distributions.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4982">The computation of the CCF under a non-cosine distribution of travel time differences. <bold>(a)</bold> The travel time difference function; <bold>(b)</bold> The simulated CCF.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5000"><bold>(a)</bold> Distribution of the large earthquakes (circles) and stations (triangles) used in this study, <bold>(b)</bold> enlarged view of the station distribution, and <bold>(c)</bold> histogram showing the number of inter-station distances in each stacking bin.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>The Real-Data Test</title>
      <p id="d2e5025">We selected 205 large earthquakes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from 2010 to 2020 with global distribution. For each event, we downloaded broadband waveforms from stations in the USArray Transportable Array. The spatial distribution of the earthquakes and stations is shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b. For the late coda radiated by each earthquake, instrument responses were removed, and the data were bandpass filtered between 0.02 and 0.07 Hz (15–50 s period) to retain core-sensitive body wave energy. For each earthquake–station pair, we extracted the late coda time window from 10 000 to 40 000 s after the origin time. This window contains dominant multiply scattered waves that have sampled deep Earth structures. For each station pair and each earthquake, we computed the cross-correlation of the coda waveforms following the procedure of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.13"/>. We then calculated the deviation angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the earthquake–station plane and the two-station plane. Correlograms were stacked within selected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges and inter-station distance bins (bin width 1°). Arrival times of target phases were picked from the stacked correlograms using automated peak detection with manual verification. The number of cross-correlation functions stacked in each bin is statistically summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e5066">The stacked correlograms are shown, with selected prominent phases labeled. Dashed lines indicate the predicted travel times of the core phases, computed using the Taup toolkit  with the ak135 reference model.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e5075">In the stacked correlograms, prominent deep Earth phases – specifically PcP, ScS, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – are clearly distinguishable (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). To quantitatively evaluate whether the illumination condition has been satisfied, we performed a bootstrap analysis by progressively increasing the number of earthquakes in the stack from 10 to 120, in increments of 10. The stabilization of travel times with an increasing event count serves as a diagnostic for meeting the illumination condition. For each subset size, we performed 250 random realizations to compute the mean travel time and standard deviation for the extracted ScS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phases.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e5105">Statistics of the mean and standard deviation of wave travel times as a function of the number of earthquakes included in the stack.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e5114">Our results reveal two key findings (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). First, for both phases, the mean travel time stabilizes and the standard deviation decreases as the number of earthquakes increases, indicating clear convergence toward a stable value. Second, significant travel-time deviations–exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s – are observed when fewer than approximately 20 earthquakes are used, particularly for the ScS phase. This indicates that a minimum event count is required to achieve locally uniform illumination. However, we emphasize that this threshold is not solely dependent on the event count, but also on the azimuthal distribution of sources, their focal mechanisms and the number of correlation traces stacked per distance bin. The cubic scaling relationship derived in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E18"/>) assumes locally uniform illumination; when this condition is violated – as seen in the smaller earthquake subsets – the scaling relationship breaks down, resulting in the observed high standard deviations.</p>
      <p id="d2e5131">According to our theoretical framework, when the locally uniform illumination condition is satisfied and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is large (as it is for both ScS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), correlation signals across different deviation planes should converge toward the true inter-station arrival time. To verify this convergence, we partitioned the correlograms based on specific ranges of the deviation angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting stacked correlograms exhibit clear signals in both the ScS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time windows; however, as predicted, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals appear more focused than those of ScS (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). This trend is further illustrated by comparing the azimuthal deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranges of (0, 20°) and (40, 60°) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a, b): while travel-time deviations for ScS reach up to 3 s, they remain nearly identical for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>c, d).</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e5208">Variation in travel times of ScS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-like waves as a function of deviation angle range. The bin width for inter-station distance is 10°.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e5230">Comparison of <bold>(a)</bold> ScS and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time windows using earthquakes with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ranges (0, 20°) and (40, 60°). <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the corresponding trough arrival times for ScS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges, respectively.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/17/855/2026/se-17-855-2026-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e5297">This study investigates the reconstruction of inter-station waves under conditions where the incidence of seismic waves is locally uniform along the propagation path. A critical angular threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>) as the ratio of the seismic wave period to the inter-station travel time, quantifies the extent of this locally uniform illumination. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E19"/>) further demonstrates that the accuracy of travel time reconstruction scales with the cube of this threshold angle. This cubic scaling relationship reveals that even under ideal uniform illumination, small travel-time deviations persist – a finding consistent with surface wave dispersion studies in inhomogeneous media <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.14"/>. The relationship provides a practical criterion for assessing expected travel-time errors in reconstructed body waves based on readily available parameters: wave period and inter-station travel time.</p>
      <p id="d2e5318">Core phases are characterized by inherently small threshold angles due to their long travel times (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 10° distance). This property has two important practical implications. First, high-precision travel-time extraction can be achieved under the locally uniform illumination condition according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E19"/>). Second, late codas radiated from a modest number of sparsely distributed earthquakes may satisfy this condition – as demonstrated by our bootstrap analysis showing convergence with approximately 50–100 events (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). Consequently, our approach relaxes the stringent requirements of traditional seismic interferometry, making it more applicable to practical coda correlation studies where global earthquake distributions are inherently non-uniform.</p>
      <p id="d2e5351">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>, the reconstructed core phases at near-zero inter-station distances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°) exhibit systematically lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) than at larger distances. This pattern can be explained within our theoretical framework. The constructive interference required to build a specific phase (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) depends on coda waves with incidence angles nearly identical to that of the target phase. For late coda waves with near-vertical incidence, the propagation path from the earthquake source to the station is substantially longer, resulting in stronger geometric attenuation and thereby reducing the amount of correlated late coda energy available for constructive interference. In addition, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c, the number of correlation traces stacked in near-zero distance bins is relatively low compared to bins at moderate distances. The reduced stacking fold further limits the enhancement of coherent signals.</p>
      <p id="d2e5379">The near-vertical incidence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value, which in turn facilitates an extremely tight convergence of correlation signals across different deviation planes (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). This geometric advantage ensures that arrival times remain nearly identical regardless of the source deviation angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. A long-standing debate in coda correlation seismology centers on whether extracted phases represent true inter-station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> arrivals (the Green's function) or a modified wavefield (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) whose travel times exhibit a systematic dependence on source distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.15"/>. Based on our theoretical analysis and empirical results, we propose that the transition from a biased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement to a true <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase travel time occurs when the following two conditions are jointly satisfied: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5463">Illumination condition for stable reconstruction: The angular range of incident waves meets or exceeds the phase-specific critical angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ensuring that the stationary phase zone is adequately sampled. This condition depends on the number of earthquakes, focal mechanisms, their azimuthal distribution relative to the inter-station path, and the distribution of inter-station directions stacked per distance bin. The degree to which this condition is satisfied can be evaluated quantitatively through bootstrap convergence analysis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>), where stabilization of travel times with increasing event count indicates that the illumination condition has been achieved. It can also be assessed by examining the convergence of the correlation signals across different deviation planes.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e5480">Smoothness condition for accurate travel time recovery: The structural setting along the ray path must yield a sufficiently smooth deviation function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, rendering higher-order terms in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E19"/>) negligible. Seismic ray theory assumes a smooth velocity structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.16"/>, which produces a smooth wavefront and thus smooth travel time variations from the source to the receiver and its surroundings – which in turn ensures a smooth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our analysis therefore remains valid within the ray-theoretical framework. Although this smoothness condition cannot yet be independently verified in the real Earth, it is a necessary prerequisite for interpreting stable measurements as true arrivals, pending future validation against earthquake-derived empirical travel times.</p></list-item></list> This unified interpretation suggests that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phenomenon and true <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase reconstruction are not mutually exclusive, but rather endpoints on a continuum defined by the degree to which locally uniform illumination and structural smoothness are achieved. In previous studies where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect was dominant, the illumination condition was likely not satisfied due to limited event counts or restricted azimuthal coverage – a scenario mirrored in our bootstrap results when using fewer than 20 earthquakes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). In contrast, the stable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PKIKP</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> travel times reported here, achieved using a globally distributed dataset spanning a decade, satisfy these criteria. Consequently, our theoretical framework reconciles these seemingly contradictory findings by providing a generalized criterion for the extraction of true travel times from the late coda.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5582">This study presents a perturbation analysis to evaluate the accuracy of travel-time reconstruction for core phases derived from late earthquake coda correlations under conditions of locally uniform wave incidence along the core-phase propagation path. We introduce a dimensionless parameter, defined as the ratio of seismic wave period to inter-station travel time, to quantify the critical angular threshold for effective reconstruction. Perturbation analysis reveals that the travel time accuracy scales with the cube of this threshold, indicating that localized uniform incidence ensures high-precision reconstruction of core phases, which are inherently characterized by low threshold values. Numerical simulations and empirical coda correlation tests sustain our theoretical findings. Our results demonstrate that accurate travel times of inter-station core phases can be reliably extracted using late coda waves from a sufficiently large number of earthquakes distributed across all deviation angles. This approach provides a practical and robust foundation for coda correlation studies, enhancing confidence in using reconstructed core phases as true empirical arrivals for interferometric imaging of Earth's deep interior.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5589">Seismic data are from the IRIS Data Management Center: <uri>https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/data/types/waveform-data/</uri> (last access: 14 May 2025).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5598">YX and XF: Conceptualization, Methodology, Theoretical derivation. XF: Software, Validation, Data processing. YX and XC: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Project administration. YX: Writing with contributions from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5604">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5610">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5616">The authors thank two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor Simone Pilia for helpful comments.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5622">This work was supported by the Shenzhen Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration Technology Program (grant no. ZDSYS20190902093007855) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41790465, 42241141, and 42374072).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5629">This paper was edited by Simone Pilia and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ardhuin et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Ardhuin, F., Gualtieri, L., and Stutzmann, E.: How ocean waves rock the Earth: Two mechanisms explain microseisms with periods 3 to 300 s, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 765–772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062782</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bensen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Bensen, G. D., Ritzwoller, M. H., Barmin, M. P., Levshin, A. L., Lin, F., Moschetti, M. P., Shapiro, N. M., and Yang, Y.: Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 1239–1260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Boué et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Boué, P., Poli, P., Campillo, M., and Roux, P.: Reverberations, coda waves and ambient noise: Correlations at the global scale and retrieval of the deep phases, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 391, 137–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.047</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Campillo and Paul(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Campillo, M. and Paul, A.: Long-Range Correlations in the Diffuse Seismic Coda, Science, 299, 547–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1078551</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Chapman(2004)</label><mixed-citation> Chapman, C.: Fundamentals of Seismic Wave Propagation, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781139451635, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Costa de Lima et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Costa de Lima, T., Tkalčić, H., and Waszek, L.: A new probe into the innermost inner core anisotropy via the global coda-correlation wavefield, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB023540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JB023540</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Costa de Lima et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Costa de Lima, T., Phạm, T.-S., Ma, X., and Tkalčić, H.: An estimate of absolute shear-wave speed in the Earth’s inner core, Nat. Commun., 14, 4577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40307-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-40307-9</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Froment et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Froment, B., Campillo, M., Roux, P., Gouédard, P., Verdel, A., and Weaver, R. L.: Estimation of the effect of nonisotropically distributed energy on the apparent arrival time in correlations, Geophysics, 75, SA85–SA93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3483102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.3483102</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Hasselmann(1963)</label><mixed-citation>Hasselmann, K.: A statistical analysis of the generation of microseisms, Rev. Geophys., 1, 177–210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG001i002p00177" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG001i002p00177</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Kennett and Phạm(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>Kennett, B. and Phạm, T.-S.: Evolution of the correlation wavefield extracted from seismic event coda, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 282, 100–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.07.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2018.07.004</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Kennett and Phạm(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>Kennett, B. and Phạm, T.-S.: The nature of Earth's correlation wavefield: late coda of large earthquakes, P. R. Soc. A, 474, 20180082, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2018.0082</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Lin et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, F.-C., Tsai, V. C., Schmandt, B., Duputel, Z., and Zhan, Z.: Extracting seismic core phases with array interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1049–1053, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50237</ext-link>, 2013. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Lobkis and Weaver(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Lobkis, O. I. and Weaver, R. L.: On the emergence of the Green's function in the correlations of a diffuse field, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110, 3011–3017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1417528" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1121/1.1417528</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Nishida(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Nishida, K.: Global propagation of body waves revealed by cross-correlation analysis of seismic hum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1691–1696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50269</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Nishida et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Nishida, K., Montagner, J.-P., and Kawakatsu, H.: Global surface wave tomography using seismic hum, Science, 326, 112–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1176389</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Phạm and Tkalčić(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Phạm, T.-S. and Tkalčić, H.: Up-to-fivefold reverberating waves through the Earth’s center and distinctly anisotropic innermost inner core, Nat. Commun., 14, 754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36074-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-36074-2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Phạm et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Phạm, T.-S., Tkalčić, H., Sambridge, M., and Kennett, B.: Earth's Correlation Wavefield: Late Coda Correlation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3035–3042, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2018GL077244</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Poli et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Poli, P., Campillo, M., and de Hoop, M.: Analysis of intermediate period correlations of coda from deep earthquakes, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 477, 147–155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.08.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.08.026</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Sabra et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Sabra, K. G., Gerstoft, P., Roux, P., Kuperman, W. A., and Fehler, M. C.: Surface wave tomography from microseisms in Southern California, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023155</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Shapiro et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Shapiro, N. M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L., and Ritzwoller, M. H.: High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise, Science, 307, 1615–1618, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1108339</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Snieder(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Snieder, R.: Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: A derivation based on stationary phase, Phys. Rev. E, 69, 046610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Tkalčić et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Tkalčić, H., Phạm, T.-S., and Wang, S.: The Earth's coda correlation wavefield: Rise of the new paradigm and recent advances, Earth-Sci. Rev., 208, 103285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103285</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Tsai(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Tsai, V. C.: On establishing the accuracy of noise tomography travel-time measurements in a realistic medium, Geophys. J. Int., 178, 1555–1564, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04239.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04239.x</ext-link>, 2009. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Wang et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Wu, G., and Chen, X.: Frequency-Bessel Transform Method for Effective Imaging of Higher-Mode Rayleigh Dispersion Curves From Ambient Seismic Noise Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 3708–3723, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JB016595</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Wang and Tkalčić(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S. and Tkalčić, H.: Seismic event coda-correlation: Toward global coda-correlation tomography, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018848, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JB018848</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Wang and Tkalčić(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S. and Tkalčić, H.: Seismic event coda-correlation's formation: implications for global seismology, Geophys. J. Int., 222, 1283–1294, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggaa259</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Wang et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Song, X., and Xia, H. H.: Equatorial anisotropy in the inner part of Earth's inner core from autocorrelation of earthquake coda, Nat. Geosci., 8, 224–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2354" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2354</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Wapenaar(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Wapenaar, K.: Retrieving the elastodynamic Green's function of an arbitrary inhomogeneous medium by cross correlation., Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 254301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.254301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.254301</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Weaver et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Weaver, R., Froment, B., and Campillo, M.: On the correlation of non-isotropically distributed ballistic scalar diffuse waves, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 126, 1817–1826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3203359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1121/1.3203359</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Wu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Wu, B., Xia, H. H., Wang, T., and Shi, X.: Simulation of Core Phases From Coda Interferometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 4983–4999, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JB015405</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Yang et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Ritzwoller, M. H., Levshin, A. L., and Shapiro, N. M.: Ambient noise Rayleigh wave tomography across Europe, Geophys. J. Int., 168, 259–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03203.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03203.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Yao et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Yao, H., van der Hilst, R. D., and de Hoop, M. V.: Surfacewave array tomography in SE Tibet from ambient seismic noise and two-station analysis – I. Phase velocity maps, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 732–744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03028.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03028.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Perturbation analysis of travel-time accuracy for core phases reconstructed from seismic interferometry</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ardhuin et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ardhuin, F., Gualtieri, L., and Stutzmann, E.: How ocean waves rock the
Earth: Two mechanisms explain microseisms with periods 3 to 300&thinsp;s,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 765–772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062782</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bensen et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bensen, G. D., Ritzwoller, M. H., Barmin, M. P., Levshin, A. L., Lin, F.,
Moschetti, M. P., Shapiro, N. M., and Yang, Y.: Processing seismic ambient
noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion
measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 1239–1260,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03374.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Boué et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boué, P., Poli, P., Campillo, M., and Roux, P.: Reverberations, coda waves
and ambient noise: Correlations at the global scale and retrieval of the deep
phases, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 391, 137–145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.047</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Campillo and Paul(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Campillo, M. and Paul, A.: Long-Range Correlations in the Diffuse Seismic Coda,
Science, 299, 547–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078551</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chapman(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chapman, C.: Fundamentals of Seismic Wave Propagation, Cambridge University
Press, ISBN 9781139451635, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Costa de Lima et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Costa de Lima, T., Tkalčić, H., and Waszek, L.: A new probe into the
innermost inner core anisotropy via the global coda-correlation wavefield,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB023540,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023540</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Costa de Lima et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Costa de Lima, T., Phạm, T.-S., Ma, X., and Tkalčić, H.: An
estimate of absolute shear-wave speed in the Earth’s inner core, Nat. Commun., 14, 4577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40307-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40307-9</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Froment et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Froment, B., Campillo, M., Roux, P., Gouédard, P., Verdel, A., and Weaver,
R. L.: Estimation of the effect of nonisotropically distributed energy on
the apparent arrival time in correlations, Geophysics, 75, SA85–SA93,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3483102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3483102</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Hasselmann(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hasselmann, K.: A statistical analysis of the generation of microseisms,
Rev. Geophys., 1, 177–210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG001i002p00177" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG001i002p00177</a>, 1963.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Kennett and Phạm(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kennett, B. and Phạm, T.-S.: Evolution of the correlation wavefield
extracted from seismic event coda, Phys. Earth Planet.
In., 282, 100–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.07.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.07.004</a>,
2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Kennett and Phạm(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kennett, B. and Phạm, T.-S.: The nature of Earth's correlation wavefield:
late coda of large earthquakes, P. R. Soc. A, 474, 20180082,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0082</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Lin et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, F.-C., Tsai, V. C., Schmandt, B., Duputel, Z., and Zhan, Z.: Extracting
seismic core phases with array interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
40, 1049–1053, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50237</a>, 2013.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Lobkis and Weaver(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lobkis, O. I. and Weaver, R. L.: On the emergence of the Green's function
in the correlations of a diffuse field, J. Acoust. Soc.
Am., 110, 3011–3017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1417528" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1417528</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Nishida(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nishida, K.: Global propagation of body waves revealed by cross-correlation
analysis of seismic hum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1691–1696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50269</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Nishida et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nishida, K., Montagner, J.-P., and Kawakatsu, H.: Global surface wave
tomography using seismic hum, Science, 326, 112–112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176389</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Phạm and Tkalčić(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Phạm, T.-S. and Tkalčić, H.: Up-to-fivefold reverberating waves
through the Earth’s center and distinctly anisotropic innermost inner
core, Nat. Commun., 14, 754,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36074-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36074-2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Phạm et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Phạm, T.-S., Tkalčić, H., Sambridge, M., and Kennett, B.: Earth's
Correlation Wavefield: Late Coda Correlation, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
45, 3035–3042, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077244</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Poli et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Poli, P., Campillo, M., and de Hoop, M.: Analysis of intermediate period
correlations of coda from deep earthquakes, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 477, 147–155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.08.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.08.026</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Sabra et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sabra, K. G., Gerstoft, P., Roux, P., Kuperman, W. A., and Fehler, M. C.:
Surface wave tomography from microseisms in Southern California,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023155</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Shapiro et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shapiro, N. M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L., and Ritzwoller, M. H.:
High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise, Science,
307, 1615–1618, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108339</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Snieder(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snieder, R.: Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda
waves: A derivation based on stationary phase, Phys. Rev. E, 69,
046610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.046610</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Tkalčić et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tkalčić, H., Phạm, T.-S., and Wang, S.: The Earth's coda
correlation wavefield: Rise of the new paradigm and recent advances,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 208, 103285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103285</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Tsai(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tsai, V. C.: On establishing the accuracy of noise tomography travel-time
measurements in a realistic medium, Geophys. J. Int., 178,
1555–1564, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04239.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04239.x</a>, 2009.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Wang et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, J., Wu, G., and Chen, X.: Frequency-Bessel Transform Method for
Effective Imaging of Higher-Mode Rayleigh Dispersion Curves From Ambient
Seismic Noise Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124,
3708–3723, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016595</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Wang and Tkalčić(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S. and Tkalčić, H.: Seismic event coda-correlation: Toward
global coda-correlation tomography, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018848, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018848</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Wang and Tkalčić(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S. and Tkalčić, H.: Seismic event coda-correlation's formation:
implications for global seismology, Geophys. J. Int., 222,
1283–1294, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa259</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Wang et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, T., Song, X., and Xia, H. H.: Equatorial anisotropy in the inner part of
Earth's inner core from autocorrelation of earthquake coda, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 224–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2354" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2354</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Wapenaar(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wapenaar, K.: Retrieving the elastodynamic Green's function of an arbitrary
inhomogeneous medium by cross correlation., Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 254301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.254301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.254301</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Weaver et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weaver, R., Froment, B., and Campillo, M.: On the correlation of
non-isotropically distributed ballistic scalar diffuse waves, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 126, 1817–1826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3203359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3203359</a>,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Wu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, B., Xia, H. H., Wang, T., and Shi, X.: Simulation of Core Phases From Coda
Interferometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123,
4983–4999, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015405</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Yang et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y., Ritzwoller, M. H., Levshin, A. L., and Shapiro, N. M.: Ambient noise
Rayleigh wave tomography across Europe, Geophys. J. Int., 168, 259–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03203.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03203.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Yao et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yao, H., van der Hilst, R. D., and de Hoop, M. V.: Surfacewave array tomography
in SE Tibet from ambient seismic noise and two-station analysis – I.
Phase velocity maps, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 732–744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03028.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03028.x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
