<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-6-633-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Understanding the factors influencing rill erosion on roadcuts in the
south eastern region of South Africa</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Understanding the factors influencing rill erosion on roadcuts in South Africa}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. E.~Seutloali and H. R.~Beckedahl}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Seutloali</surname><given-names>K. E.</given-names></name>
          <email>kseutloali@yahoo.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Beckedahl</surname><given-names>H. R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Discipline of
Geography, University of KwaZulu-Natal, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>P/Bag X01, Scottsville,
Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">K. E. Seutloali (kseutloali@yahoo.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>633</fpage><lpage>641</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Erosion on roadcuts is a concern due to the potential of causing environmental
degradation, which has significant economic costs. It is therefore critical
to understand the relationship between roadcut characteristics and soil
erosion for designing roadcuts that are less vulnerable to erosion and to
help road rehabilitation works. This study investigated the characteristics
(i.e. gradient, length, percentage of vegetation cover and soil texture) of
degraded (i.e. with rills) and non-degraded roadcuts (i.e. without rills)
and explored the relationship of the roadcut characteristics with the
dimensions (widths and depths) of the rills. Degraded roadcuts were steep
(52.21<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), long (10.70 m) and had a low percentage of vegetation
cover (24.12) when compared to non-degraded roadcuts which had a gradient of
28.24<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, length of 6.38 m and 91.7 % of vegetation cover.
Moreover, the gradient and percentage of vegetation cover of the roadcut
significantly determine the rill dimensions. The widths and depths of the
rills increase with the increase in slope gradient and decrease with an
increase in percentage of vegetation cover. Moreover, the widths and
depths of the rills decreased downslope of the roadcuts. Based on these
results, re-vegetation of roadcuts as well as construction of gentle
gradients could minimise rill erosion and hence the negative on-site and
off-site effects.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Soil erosion is regarded as one of the most critical environmental problems
worldwide (e.g. Meadows, 2003; Le Roux et al., 2007, 2008; Schönbrodt-Stitt et al., 2013;
Ma et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2007). It mainly occurs in the form of sheet, rill and/or gully erosion
(Morgan, 2005; Le Roux et al., 2008). Amongst the three
forms, rill erosion remains the main cause for concern since it is a
precursor of gully erosion. Rill erosion mainly occurs as a result of
concentrated overland flow of water leading to the development of small
well-defined channels (Haile and Fetene, 2012). These channels act as
sediment sources and transport passages, leading to soil loss (Wirtz et
al., 2012). Although soil erosion is a natural process, it has been
accelerated by human impact on the landscape due to agriculture,
grazing, mining and fire (García-Orenes et al., 2009;
Giménez-Morera et al., 2010; Leh et al., 2013; Lieskovský and
Kenderessy, 2012; Mandal and Sharda, 2013; Zhao et al., 2013; Ziadat and
Taimeh, 2013). The construction of roads, railways and other infrastructures also result in soil
degradation and changes in the landforms (Cao et al., 2013; Cerdà,
2007; Cheng et al., 2013; Jimenez et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2013; Villarreal
et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The study of soil erosion, particularly in South Africa, has, however, been
limited to agricultural and pastoral land, and research investigating
road-related soil erosion is scarce, despite much literature having been
produced on combating soil erosion per se. Roads result in the permanent
alteration of the geomorphic and hydrological settings of the landscape,
leading to increased soil erosion (Ramos-Scharron and Macdonald,
2007). Previous studies have shown that roads result in the creation of
roadcuts that contribute to runoff and high sediment production that cause
extreme land degradation (e.g. Arnáez et al., 2004; Megahan et al.,
2001; Xu et al., 2009). Arnáez et al. (2004) recorded a significant
generation of runoff and sediment from roadcuts in the Iberian Range, Spain,
and this was attributed to steep gradients and low vegetation cover.
Megahan et al. (2001) evaluated the effects of slope gradient, slope
length, slope aspect, rainfall erosivity and ground cover density on erosion
on roadcuts in Idaho, USA. The results of multiple regression analysis
demonstrated that the slope gradient was the most significant of all site
variables in affecting erosion on the roadcuts. Moreover, Xu et
al. (2009) evaluated the effects of rainfall and slope length on runoff and
soil loss on the Qinghai–Tibet highway sideslopes in China and found that
rainfall intensity correlated with sediment concentration and soil loss,
while soil loss decreased with increasing slope length. In summary, these
studies highlight that slope properties (viz. slope gradient and length,
vegetation cover and soil properties, particularly soil texture) of the
roadcuts are critical in determining the degree of soil erosion along these
areas. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated why
certain roadcuts are eroded while others are not, and none has explored the
relationship between the roadcut slope characteristics and the dimensions of
the rills. Moreover, most of the studies of erosion on roadcuts have been
conducted outside southern Africa.</p>
      <p>Construction of roads in South Africa has resulted in the creation of
roadcuts, some of which have developed extensive rills and fluting (or
incipient gullies). Soil erosion on roadcuts is significant, since soil loss
can reach magnitudes of 247.6 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Megahan et al., 2001). Moreover,
roadcuts have been regarded as the main source of erosion than other parts
of the road system since they account for 70–90 % of soil loss
(Grace III, 2000). The off-site loss of sediment material may lead to
river and reservoir siltation where sediment is deposited (Cerdà,
2007; Zhao et al., 2013). This can exacerbate water management problems,
particularly in a semi-arid region such as South Africa, where water
scarcity is frequent (Marker and Sidorchuk, 2003). Moreover, erosion
on roadcuts may cause roadside slope instability (De Ona et al.,
2009; Osorio and De Ona, 2006). At present, a large volume of soil is lost
annually through water erosion in South Africa. It is estimated that South
Africa loses approximately 400 million tons of soil per year, of which
roadcut erosion is a major contributor (Dlamini et al., 2011).
The economic costs associated with the negative impacts of erosion are
significant. For instance, it is estimated that soil erosion costs
approximately USD 200 million annually, including the off-site
costs of purification of silted dam water in South Africa (Le Roux et al., 2008).
Additionally, slope instability could create excessive
maintenance costs (Robichaud et al., 2001), and in extreme cases requires
re-grading or reconstruction of the site (Persyn et al.,
2005). In the light of the above, understanding the relationship between the
characteristics of roadcuts and rill erosion can be important for
sustainable future road construction and soil erosion control. The present
study therefore aims to assess the characteristics (gradient, length and
vegetation cover) of degraded and non-degraded roadcuts to understand why
rills are present on some roadcuts but not others, and to investigate the
relationship between the characteristics of the roadcuts and the dimensions
(width and depth) of the rills in the south eastern region of South Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Site description</title>
      <p>The roadcuts used in this study are located in the south eastern part of
South Africa within the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Province and the former Transkei
region of the Eastern Cape Province (Fig. 1). In this study, roadcuts are
defined as roadslopes that result from excavation of high areas. The study
area is characterised by a high level of erosion (Hoffman and
Todd, 2000; Le Roux et al., 2007) and road construction has provided
roadcuts that could exacerbate the problem. The terrain of the area is
undulating; it consists of a series of dissected steps that rise from a
relatively flat coastal plain in the east of South Africa, to the
Drakensberg mountains which reach over 3000 metres above sea level and form
the western boundary of the region (Beckedahl, 1996).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The location of the studied roadcuts in the south eastern
region of South Africa.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Schematic representation of slope angle and length
measurements on the roadcuts.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>KZN has a subtropical climate characterised by high humidity, high temperatures
and high rainfall (900–1200 mm) (Fairbanks and Benn, 2000). Summers are warm
and wet, while winters are cool and dry. The climate changes gradually from
the coast to the westerly plateau. On the other hand, the greater part of
the Transkei is characterised by a sub-humid warm climate with summer-dominant rainfall (Jeschke et al., 1990). Annual rainfall varies between
500 and 1400 mm, with a mean temperature of 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(Madikizela, 2000). This region has among the highest values of
rainfall erosivity index (EI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 MJ mm ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in southern Africa (Beckedahl, 1996). The EI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows the potential ability
for rainfall to cause soil erosion (da Silva, 2004). It is the product of the total storm kinetic energy and the maximum
30 minutes rainfall intensity (Le Roux et al., 2008). The
biomes of KZN and Transkei range from coastal tropical forest along the
coast and inland along the riverine gorges, to temperate transitional forest
and scrub to grassveld. Geology of the study area consists mainly of
sandstones and mudstones of Beaufort and Ecca groups (Beckedahl, 1996).
The geology has minor exposures of the Natal Group sandstones. The soil
types vary from podzolic and duplex soils of the midlands and coastal belt
(Beckedahl, 1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Field data collection</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Identification of roadcuts</title>
      <p>Roadcuts of interest were identified by first traversing main and regional
roads in the south eastern region of South Africa on Google Earth. Following
the above procedure, field inspection was conducted on identified sites to
assess the actual condition of the roadcuts. Roadcuts were then numbered and
random samples selected using random number tables, to get actual sizes for
detailed investigation. The roadcuts were then categorised into degraded and
non-degraded. For the purpose of this study, the degraded were those with
the presence of either rills or flutes, whereas non-degraded roadcuts were
those with no apparent rilling. This resulted in twenty nine degraded and
twenty non-degraded roadcuts. The degraded roadcuts were further classified
into three erosion categories based on the mean percentage cover of rills
per square metre plots established on the roadcuts: (1) slight: less than
25 %; (2) moderate: between 25 and 50 %; (3) extensive: between
50 and 75 %; and (4) very extensive: above 75 %. The selected
roadcuts did not receive any form of treatment after construction (e.g.
hydroseeding) and were characterised by natural herbaceous vegetation
cover. Additionally, the selected roadcuts were located along roads that
were constructed at the same period to minimise the effects of the roadcuts'
age on erosion. Moreover, these roadcuts were chosen because precipitation
across the study region did not vary significantly; hence it was assumed
that the selected roadcuts received approximately the same amount of
rainfall.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Measurement of the roadcut characteristics</title>
      <p>The gradient, length, percentage of vegetation cover and soil texture (i.e.
percentage of sand, silt and clay content) were measured on the degraded and
non-degraded roadcuts identified in the south eastern region of South
Africa. Slope profile measurements were done along three cross-profile
transects on each roadcut by using an Abney level, a ranging rod and a
measuring tape. Transects were established from the top to the bottom of the
roadcuts, with the first transect running along the maximum slope length.
The next two transects were located on both sides of the first transect and
halfway to the end of the roadcut width (Fig. 2). Slope profiles were
measured by recording a series of measured lengths along a transect and
corresponding series of measured angles. The slope gradient for each
roadcut was calculated as the average of averages for each transect. The
maximum lengths of the roadcuts were then considered as overall lengths of
the roadcuts.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Schematic representation of rill survey plots on the
roadcuts.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Descriptive statistics for slope characteristics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center">Degraded roadcuts </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center">Non-degraded roadcuts </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slope characteristics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">max</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">max</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">78.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">52.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">42.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Length (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Veg. cover ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">91.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sand ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">26.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Silt ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clay ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>SD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Percentage of vegetation cover was measured by demarcating transects made of
1 m long and 4 m wide plots which were then numbered. Random samples were
selected from the numbered plots using random number tables, to get actual
sizes for detailed investigation. This resulted in selection of more than 70 %
of the plots on each roadcut, of which the number of plots on each
roadcut was determined by the surface area. In each plot, a 4 m string
attached to two metal pins was placed at 0.5 m length of a plot. Vegetation
cover was calculated as the total vegetated distance of the string to the
total length of the string, and recorded as a percentage (Kercher et
al., 2003). Total percentage of vegetation cover for the entire roadcut was
then calculated as the mean of all plots percentage covers (Bochet and
García-Fayos, 2004).</p>
      <p>Soil samples obtained from the rill complex of the roadcuts were placed in
labelled sample bags. All sample bags were stored in dry conditions until
they were transported to the laboratory for determination of the soil texture
(i.e. percentage sand, silt and clay content). Soil texture was determined
by the pipette/hydrometer method for the fraction of particles with a
diameter less than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (clay fraction) by sieving for particles
between 200 and 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (coarse sand) and between 20 and 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(fine sand), while the fraction between 2 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (silt) was obtained
by difference (Mesquita et al., 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>The measurement of rill dimensions</title>
      <p>Measurements of rill dimensions were made from 4 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> plots located
upslope, midslope and downslope of the roadcuts (Fig. 3). The widths and
depths of the rill were measured using a measuring tape and a 30 cm ruler
respectively, at regular intervals (i.e. 0.01 m) along the sinuous length of
the rill, and the averages were calculated (Hagmann, 1996; Sidle et al.,
2004).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Field data analysis</title>
      <p>Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social
Sciences (SPSS) version 21 software. The Kolmogorov–Smirnof test was used
to test data normality. A test of proportions was employed to determine
whether there were significant differences between slope characteristics of
the degraded and non-degraded roadcuts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
at a 95 % confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) was used to determine whether
there were significant differences between slope characteristics of the
slightly, moderately, extensively and very extensively degraded roadcuts.
Pearson correlation was used to evaluate whether there were any associations
between slope characteristics (gradient, length, percentage of vegetation
cover and soil texture) and rill dimensions. Similarly, one-way ANOVA (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05)
with a Tukey's HSD post-hoc test was used to determine if
there were any significant differences of rill dimensions upslope, midslope
and downslope of the roadcuts.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Characteristics of the roadcuts</title>
      <p>The slope characteristics of the roadcuts are presented in Table 1. Results
show that these characteristics ranged widely for the roadcuts. It can be
observed that the mean slope gradient of the degraded roadcuts was higher
(52.51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than that of the non-degraded roadcuts (28.24<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Similarly, the mean length of degraded roadcuts was higher (10.70 m) when
compared to that of the non-degraded roadcuts (6.38 m). The vegetation cover
for degraded roadcuts was low, with a mean percentage of 24.12, while
non-degraded roadcuts had a higher mean percentage of vegetation cover of
91.71. The mean sand content of degraded roadcuts was 66 % while the
non-degraded had a mean of 39.5 %. Additionally, mean silt contents of
22 and 20.4 % were observed for degraded and non-degraded roadcuts,
respectively. Moreover, the mean clay content for degraded roadcuts was
8.7 %, while the non-degraded roadcuts had a percentage of 39.1.</p>
      <p>The results in Fig. 4 show the significant differences of slope gradient,
length, percentage of vegetation cover, and the percentage of sand, silt and
clay content between non-degraded (ND) and degraded (D) roadcuts. It can be
observed that the slope gradient and length of degraded roadcuts are
significantly (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) higher than for non-degraded roadcuts.
Moreover, vegetation cover for degraded roadcuts is significantly lower than
that for non-degraded roadcuts. The percentage of clay content was higher
for degraded roadcuts than that of the non-degraded roadcuts, while the
percentage silt and clay contents were not significantly different.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Proportions of slope gradient, length, vegetation cover,
sand, silt and clay for non-degraded (ND) and degraded (D) roadcuts. Bars
represent proportions of different roadcut characteristics and whiskers
represent 95 % confidence intervals.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/6/633/2015/se-6-633-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>On the other hand, the results of ANOVA with post-hoc test showed that
there were no significant differences (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.05) amongst the site
variables (slope length, gradient, percentage of the vegetation cover, sand,
silt and clay) of the slightly, moderately and extensively degraded
roadcuts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Rill dimensions</title>
      <p>The results show that the characteristics of the roadcuts significantly
determine rill dimensions (Table 2). Significant moderate positive
correlations of gradient with both rill width and depth were observed, while
the percentage of vegetation cover had a strong significant negative
correlation with rill depth and width. The rill width and depth, however,
were not significantly influenced by the roadcut length.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Significant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) relationships between site
variables and rill width as well as depth from Pearson correlation results.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{0.95}[0.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Width</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">Depth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slope length</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.210</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.221</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.110</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slope gradient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.371</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.339</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.018<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.033<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation cover ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.621</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.637</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sand ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clay ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Silt ( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Significance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Correlation is significant at 0.05 level.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The mean values for rill dimensions at different roadcut slope positions
(upslope, midslope and downslope) are shown in Table 3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Mean rill width and depth values for different slope
positions on roadcut embankments under study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slope position</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Width (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depth (m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Upslope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.079</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Midslope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.064</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Downslope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.045</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The rill dimensions were significantly different at different plot positions
(Table 4), with values decreasing downslope. The results showed that the
rill dimensions had highly significant differences between the upslope and
downslope positions.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p>The results of ANOVA using a Tukey's HSD post-hoc test for
rill dimensions (width and depth) and different slope positions (upslope,
midslope and downslope) at 95 % confidence level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slope position</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rill width</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Rill depth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">US vs MS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.149 ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.104 ns</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">US vs DS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MS vs DS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.041</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>US <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> upslope; MS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> midslope; DS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> downslope;
ns <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> non-significant</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussions</title>
      <p>This study aimed at evaluating the characteristics of the degraded and
non-degraded roadcuts as well as assessing the relationship between the rill
dimensions and the roadcut characteristics.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>The characteristics of roadcuts</title>
      <p>The results of this study have shown that the characteristics of the
degraded roadcuts were significantly different from those of the
non-degraded. For instance, it was noted that degraded roadcuts were
characterised by high slope gradients and lengths, low vegetation cover and
lower clay content percentage, when compared to the non-degraded roadcuts.
These results are comparable with previous studies which indicated that
these conditions increase the vulnerability of roadcuts to erosion
(Arnáez et al., 2004; Bochet and García-Fayos, 2004; Flanagan et
al., 2002). This is true because literature shows that an increase in slope
gradient reduces the infiltration rate, hence increasing runoff
(Arnáez et al., 2004; Manyatsi and Ntshangase, 2008; Megahan et al.,
2001). A study by Arnáez et al. (2004) in the Iberian Range, Spain,
demonstrated a significant positive relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.76;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004) between roadcut slope gradients and runoff which could result in a
substantial increase in the formation of rills (Fox and Bryan, 2000).
Formation of rills results from the increased scouring capacity of
concentrated runoff (Haile and Fetene, 2012). Similarly, Jordan and
Martinez-Zavala (2008) recorded a total soil loss of 106 and 17 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
from roadcut and side-cast fills, respectively, in southern Spain.
The highest erosion rate was observed on the roadcuts due to steep slopes.</p>
      <p>The results of this study have also demonstrated that the degraded
roadcuts had longer slope lengths compared to the non-degraded. To some
extent, this observation is valid because longer lengths have the ability to
increase runoff velocity, resulting in both increased soil particle
detachment and transport efficiency downslope as compared to shorter slope
lengths. For instance, a study by Chaplot and Le Bissonnais (2003)
indicated that slopes associated with long lengths have the ability to
increase runoff velocity as well as quantity, thereby influencing rill
development. Furthermore, a study by Kinnell (2000) showed that
an increase in slope length increases erosion by water, particularly when
slope gradients exceed 10 %. However, these findings are in contrast with
other studies. For instance, Megahan et al. (2001) concluded that slope
length alone or in interaction with other variables has no detectable
effects on roadcut erosion. Similarly, Luce and Black (1999) found that
roadcut slope length is insignificant in determining erosion by water.
Although the findings from the above two studies illustrate slope
length as having an insignificant effect on runoff and rill erosion
development, this may be due to other soil erosion contributing factors that
do not favour rill development. For instance, areas associated with clay soil
properties are bound to have less rill development despite having long slope
lengths, when compared to those that are characterised by sandy soils.</p>
      <p>The mean percentage of vegetation cover (predominantly herbaceous) for
non-degraded roadcuts was high (91.7 %) when compared to degraded roadcuts
(24.12); hence limited soil erosion was noted. This observation stands
because vegetation cover has been found to stabilise and protect slopes
against erosion since the roots hold soil particles together (Bochet and
García-Fayos, 2004; Mohammad and Adam, 2010). Also, this can be
explained by the ability of vegetation cover to moderate and dissipate the
energy exerted by water (Lal, 2001; Ande et al., 2009). In fact,
vegetation intercepts rainfall, increases infiltration of water, intercepts
runoff and stabilises the soil with roots (Bochet and
García-Fayos, 2004; Loch, 2000). The results of this study are
supported by the work of Cerdan et al. (2002) who observed that the
occurrence of rill erosion on fields was directly a function of vegetation
cover. Similarly, Arnáez et al. (2004) found a negative correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) between vegetation cover and runoff. According to
Laker (2004), vegetation cover (i.e. herbaceous plants) protects the
soil because of their high basal cover, dense and very fine root systems
that bind the soil.</p>
      <p>The higher percentage of clay content for non-degraded roadcuts could be an
indication of the role of clay in reducing soil erosion. An increase in clay
content of the soil has been associated with the increase in aggregate
stability, thereby decreasing soil erodibility (Dlamini et al., 2011).
Haile and Fetene (2012) indicated that fine-textured soils such as clays
are not readily detached because of the strong cohesive forces that keep
them aggregated. Yýlmaz et al. (2008) also observed a higher
susceptibility of soil to erosion where the content of clay was low.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>The relationship between slope characteristics and rill dimensions</title>
      <p>The roadcut embankment slope characteristics were assessed for their
correlation with the rill dimensions. The results indicate that vegetation
cover was the foremost significant variable in determining rill dimensions
on the roadcuts, while slope length and silt content had no significant
effect. A strong negative correlation between vegetation cover and rill
dimensions suggests that an increase in vegetation cover reduces the cross
sections of the rills. Vegetation cover in a rill catchment reduces runoff
and sediment yield through rainfall interception, infiltration and
resistance to flow (Woo et al., 1997). A significant positive
correlation of slope gradient and rill dimensions indicates that an increase
in slope gradient increases the volume of rills and hence the volume of soil
loss (Berger et al., 2010). However, a moderate correlation of slope
gradient and rill dimensions suggests that rill configuration is more complex
than being merely slope gradient-dependent. Similarly, a moderate negative
correlation between clay content and rill dimensions implies that an
increase in clay content of the soil could reduce the sizes of the rills on
roadcuts. This finding is similar to the study of Marquisee (2010), who
found a negative correlation between clay content and the percentage cover
and number of gully channels.</p>
      <p>The dimensions of rills that extended continuously from the top to the
bottom of the roadcuts changed significantly downslope. Previous research has
indicated that significant changes in rill dimensions are determined by soil
detachment and deposition along the length of the rill (Bennett et
al., 2000; Lei and Nearing, 1998). In this study, a decrease in rill depth
downslope suggests that a progressive increase in sediment load downslope
decreases detachment rate (Lei and Nearing, 1998). However, this was
significant between upslope and downslope position, and between midslope and
downslope positions. This suggests that detachment is active between upslope
and midslope, while downslope positions are efficient in transporting the
eroded sediment. The results are comparable with other studies available in
literature (Bennett et al., 2000; Cochrane and Flanagan, 1997; Lei et
al., 2001; Merten et al., 2001). Cochrane and Flanagan (1997) found that
detachment decreases with the introduction of sediment at the top of the
rill. Additionally, Bennett et al. (2000) observed that bed degradation
was high in the upslope section of the channel, while Merten et al. (2001)
reported a decrease in detachment, with an increase in sediment load
along the channel length due to the suspended bed load that reduced the
detachment capacity. In this study, a decrease in rill width downslope
implies that the scouring of the rill side walls decreased as a result of
the limited scouring capacity of flow, due to increase in the sediment load
downslope (Bewket and Sterk, 2003). In addition, Lei et al. (2001)
indicated that sediment load decreases the detachment rates particularly on
slopes greater than 15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the findings of this study are in
contrast with the study by Okoba and Sterk (2006), who observed a
consistent increase in rill width and depth downslope, and attributed this to
cumulative runoff volume and velocity along the slope.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study aimed to assess the characteristics (gradient, length and
vegetation cover) of degraded and non-degraded roadcuts and investigate the
relationship between the characteristics of roadcuts and the dimensions
(width and depth) of rills in the south eastern region of South Africa.
Degraded roadcuts were steeper, longer and had a lower percentage of
vegetation cover when compared to non-degraded roadcuts. The results have
shown that the widths and depths of the rills increase with an increase in
slope gradient and a decrease in percentage of vegetation cover. Hence, low
gradient and establishment of vegetation on roadcuts is recommended.
Overall, while this study has contributed to the understanding of the
relationship between the characteristics of roadcuts and rill erosion,
explicit investigations are required that would help maximise the quality of
observations. Future research should focus on the measurement of the actual
soil loss from the rills and the contribution of bulldozer teeth impressions
on roadcuts and on the development of rills. Additionally, repeated
observations should be made for an accurate description of rill evolution
and to determine any significant change in the rill cross sections. The
results of this study can help road construction planners, engineers and
site constructors to design roadcuts that are less vulnerable to erosion.
Additionally, they could help the Transport Department and road maintenance
agencies in planning for roadcut embankment rehabilitation work.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>This study was conducted with the input of the co-author
(H. R. Beckedahl), while the bulk of the design and analysis were conducted by the main author
(K. E. Seutloali).</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the University of KwaZulu-Natal for funding this research.
Our gratitude goes to Timothy Dube, Lucky Nkomo and Fadzai Pwiti for their
support during the data collection phase.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Cerdà</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ande, O., Alaga, Y., and Oluwatosin, G.:
Soil erosion prediction using MMF model on highly dissected hilly terrain
of Ekiti environs in southwestern Nigeria,
Int. J. Phys. Sci.,
4, 53–57, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arnáez, J., Larrea, V., and Ortigosa, L.:
Surface runoff and soil erosion on unpaved forest roads from rainfall simulation tests in northeastern Spain,
Catena,
57, 1–14, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Beckedahl, H.:
Subsurface Soil Erosion Phenomena in Transkei and Southern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,
Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
Descipline of Geography, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bennett, S., Casali, J., Robinson, K., and Kadavy, K.:
Characteristics of actively eroding ephemeral gullies in an experimental channel,
T. ASAE, 43, 641–649, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, C., Schulze, M., Rieke-Zapp, D., and Schlunegger, F.:
Rill development and soil erosion: a laboratory study of slope and rainfall intensity,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
35, 1456–1467, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bewket, W. and Sterk, G.:
Assessment of soil erosion in cultivated fields using a survey methodology for rills in the Chemoga watershed, Ethiopia,
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.,
97, 81–93, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bochet, E. and García-Fayos, P.:
Factors controlling vegetation establishment and water erosion on motorway slopes in Valencia, Spain,
Restor. Ecol.,
12, 166–174, 2004.
Cao, L., Zhang, K., Dai, H., and Liang, Y.:
Modeling interrill erosion on unpaved roads in the Loess Plateau of China,
Land Degrad. Dev., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2253" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ldr.2253</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cerdà, A.: Soil water erosion on road embankments in eastern Spain,
Sci. Total Environ., 378, 151–155, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cerdan, O., Le Bissonnais, Y., Couturier, A., Bourennane, H., and Souchère, V.:
Rill erosion on cultivated hillslopes during two extreme rainfall events in Normandy, France,
Soil Till. Res., 67, 99–108, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chaplot, V. A. and Le Bissonnais, Y.: Runoff features for interrill erosion at
different rainfall intensities, slope lengths, and gradients in an agricultural loessial hillslope,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, 844–851, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, B., Lv, Y., Zhan, Y., Su, D., and Cao, S.:
Constructing China's roads as works of art: a case study of “esthetic greenway” construction in the Shennongjia region of China,
Land Degrad. Dev.,  1–7, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ldr.2210</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cochrane, T. and Flanagan, D.: Detachment in a simulated rill,
T. ASAE, 40, 111–119, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
da Silva, A. M.: Rainfall erosivity map for Brazil,
Catena, 57, 251–259, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
De Ona, J., Osorio, F., and Garcia, P. A.:
Assessing the effects of using compost-sludge mixtures to reduce erosion in road embankments,
J. Hazard. Mater., 164, 1257–1265, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dlamini, P., Orchard, C., Jewitt, G., Lorentz, S., Titshall, L., and Chaplot, V.:
Controlling factors of sheet erosion under degraded grasslands in the sloping lands of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,
Agr. Water Manage., 98, 1711–1718, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fairbanks, D. H. and Benn, G. A.:
Identifying regional landscapes for conservation planning: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,
Landscape Urban Plan., 50, 237–257, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Flanagan, D., Chaudhari, K., and Norton, L.:
Polyacrylamide soil amendment effects on runoff and sediment yield on steep slopes: Part II. Natural rainfall conditions,
T. ASAE, 45, 1339–1351, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, D. M. and Bryan, R. B.:
The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient,
Catena,
38, 211–222, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
García-Orenes, F., Cerdà, A., Mataix-Solera, J., Guerrero, C., Bodí, M., Arcenegui, V., Zornoza, R., and Sempere, J.:
Effects of agricultural management on surface soil properties and soil–water losses in eastern Spain,
Soil Till. Res.,
106, 117–123, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Giménez-Morera, A., Sinoga, J., and Cerdà, A.:
The impact of cotton geotextiles on soil and water losses from Mediterranean rainfed agricultural land,
Land Degrad. Dev.,
21, 210–217, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Grace III, J.:
Forest road sideslopes and soil conservation techniques,
J. Soil Water Conserv.,
55, 96–101, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hagmann, J.: Mechanical soil conservation with contour ridges: cure for, or cause of, rill erosion?,
Land Degrad. Dev., 7, 145–160, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Haile, G. and Fetene, M.: Assessment of soil erosion hazard in Kilie catchment, East Shoa, Ethiopia,
Land Degrad. Dev., 23, 293–306, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffman, M. T. and Todd, S.:
A national review of land degradation in South Africa: the influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors,
J. S. Afr. Stud., 26, 733–758, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Jeschke, N., Nelson, P. E., and Marasas, W.:
<italic>Fusarium</italic> species isolated from soil samples collected at different altitudes in the Transkei, southern Africa,
Mycologia,
82, 727–733, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, M., Ruiz-Capillas, P., Mola, I., Pérez-Corona, E., Casado, M., and Balaguer, L.:
Soil development at the roadside: a case study of a novel ecosystem,
Land Degrad. Dev., 24, 564–574, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jordan, A. and Martinez-Zavala, L.: Soil loss and runoff rates on unpaved
forest roads in southern Spain after simulated rainfall, For. Ecol. Manage.,
255, 913–919, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kercher, S. M., Frieswyk, C. B., and Zedler, J. B.:
Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover,
J. Veg. Sci., 14, 899–906, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kinnell, P.:
The effect of slope length on sediment concentrations associated with side-slope erosion,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1004–1008, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Laker, M. C.: South Africa's Soil Resources and Sustainable Development, Pretoria, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lal, R.: Soil degradation by erosion, Land Degrad. Dev.,
12, 519–539, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Le Roux, J. J., Newby, T. S., and Sumner, P. D.:
Monitoring soil erosion in South Africa at a regional scale: review and recommendations,
S. Afr. J. Sci., 103, 329–335, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Le Roux, J. J., Morgenthal, T. L., Malherbe, J., Pretorius, D. J., and Sumner, P. D.:
Water erosion prediction at a national scale for South Africa,
Water SA, 34, 305–314, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. W., Park, C. M., and Rhee, H.:
Revegetation of decomposed granite roadcuts in Korea: developing digger, evaluating
cost effectiveness, and determining dimensions of drilling holes, revegetation species, and mulching treatment,
Land Degrad. Dev., 24, 591–604, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Leh, M., Bajwa, S., and Chaubey, I.: Impact of land use change on erosion risk: an
integrated remote sensing, geographic information system and modeling methodology,
Land Degrad. Dev., 24, 409–421, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lei, T. and Nearing, M. A.: Rill erosion and morphological evolution: a simulation model,
Water Resour. Res., 34, 3157–3168, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lei, T., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J., and Tang, Z.: A laboratory study of sediment transport capacity in the dynamic process of rill erosion,
T. ASAE, 44, 1537–1542, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lieskovský, J. and Kenderessy, P.:
Modelling the effect of vegetation cover and different tillage practices on soil
erosion in vineyards: a case study in Vráble (Slovakia) using WATEM/SEDEM,
Land Degrad. Dev.,
25, 288–296, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Loch, R.: Effects of vegetation cover on runoff and erosion under simulated rain
and overland flow on a rehabilitated site on the Meandu Mine, Tarong, Queensland,
Soil Research, 38, 299–312, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Luce, C. H. and Black, T. A.: Sediment production from forest roads in western Oregon,
Water Resour. Res., 35, 2561–2570, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, X., He, Y., Xu, J., van Noordwijk, M., and Lu, X.:
Spatial and temporal variation in rainfall erosivity in a Himalayan watershed,
Catena, 121, 248–259, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Madikizela, P. N. T.:
Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Soil Erosion in Mt Ayliff and Mt Frere, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa,
Unpublished Masters Thesis, Discipline of Geography,
University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mandal, D. and Sharda, V.:
Appraisal of soil erosion risk in the eastern Himalayan region of India for soil conservation planning,
Land Degrad. Dev.,
24, 430–437, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Manyatsi, A. M. and Ntshangase, N.:
Mapping of soil erosion using remotely sensed data in Zombodze South, Swaziland,
Phys. Chem. Earth Pts. A/B/C,
33, 800–806, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Marker, M. and Sidorchuk, A.: Assessment of Gully Erosion Process Dynamics
for Water Resource Management in a Semiarid Catchment of Swaziland (Southern
Africa), Proceedings of Symposium HS01 “Erosion Prediction in Ungauged
Basins: Integrating Methods and Techniques” Sapporo, 2003, 188–198, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Marquisee, J. A.: Factors Influencing Gully Development on Roadcuts in
Southeastern Ohio, Master of Arts, Department of Geography, Ohio University,
Athens, OH, USA, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Meadows, M. E.:
Soil erosion in the Swartland, western Cape Province, South Africa: implications of past and present policy practice,
Environ. Sci. Policy,
6, 17–28, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Megahan, W. F., Wilson, M., and Monsen, S. B.:
Sediment production from granitic cutslopes on forest roads in Idaho, USA,
Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
26, 153–163, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Merten, G., Nearing, M., and Borges, A.:
Effect of sediment load on soil detachment and deposition in rills,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
65, 861–868, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mesquita, M., Gonçalves, M., Gonçalves, A., and Neves, M.: Effect of
electrolyte concentration on sodium adsorption: Application of competitive
extended Freundlich isotherms, Arid Land Res. Manage., 19, 161–172, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Mohammad, A. G. and Adam, M. A.:
The impact of vegetative cover type on runoff and soil erosion under different land uses,
Catena, 81, 97–103, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.01.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2010.01.008</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Morgan, R. P. C.: Soil Erosion and Conservation, Blackwell Publishing, UK,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Okoba, B. O. and Sterk, G.:
Quantification of visual soil erosion indicators in Gikuuri catchment in the central highlands of Kenya,
Geoderma,
134, 34–47, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Osorio, F. and De Ona, J.:
Using compost from urban solid waste to prevent erosion in road embankments,
J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A,
41, 2311–2327, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Persyn, R. A., Glanville, T. D., Richard, T. L., Laflen, J. M., and
Dixon, P. M.: Environmental effects of applying composted organics to new
highway embankments: Part III. Rill erosion, Am. Soc. Agr. Engin., 48,
1765–1772, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ramos-Scharron, C. E. and Macdonald, L. H.: Runoff and Suspended Sediment
Yields from Unpaved Road Segment, St. John, US Virgin Islands, Hydrol.
Proc., 21, 35–50, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Robichaud, P., McCool, D., Pannkuk, C., Brown, R., and Mutch, P.: Trap
efficiency of silt fences used in hillslope erosion studies, Proceedings of
the International Symposium, Soil Erosion Research for the 21st Century,
Honolulu, 541–543, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Schönbrodt-Stitt, S., Bosch, A., Behrens, T., Hartmann, H., Shi, X., and Scholten, T.:
Approximation and spatial regionalization of rainfall erosivity based on
sparse data in a mountainous catchment of the Yangtze River in Central China,
Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 20, 6917–6933, 2013.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Sidle, R. C., Sasaki, S., Otsuki, M., Noguchi, S., and Rahim Nik, A.:
Sediment pathways in a tropical forest: effects of logging roads and skid trails,
Hydrol. Process.,
18, 703–720, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Villarreal, M. L., Webb, R. H., Norman, L. M., Psillas, J. L., Rosenberg, A. S., Carmichael, S., Petrakis, R. E., and Sparks, P. E.:
Modeling landscape-scale erosion potential related to vehicle disturbances along the USA–Mexico border,
Land Degrad. Dev., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ldr.2317</ext-link>, online first, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, W., Chen, L., Fu, B., Huang, Z., Wu, D., and Gui, L.:
The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area,
China, J. Hydrol.,
335, 247–258, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wirtz, S., Seeger, M., and Ries, J.:
Field experiments for understanding and quantification of rill erosion processes,
Catena, 91, 21–34, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Woo, M., Fang, G., and diCenzo, P. D.:
The role of vegetation in the retardation of rill erosion,
Catena,
29, 145–159, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Liu, W., Kong, Y., Zhang, K., Yu, B., and Chen, J.: Runoff and Water
Erosion on Road Side- Slopes: Effects of Rainfall Characteristics and Slope
Length, Transport. Res., 14, 497–501, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Yýlmaz, M., Yýlmaz, F., Karagul, R., and Altun, L.: Changes in
erodibility indices and some soil properties according to parent materials
and land use regimes in erfelek dam creek watershed (Sinop, Turkey),
Fresenius Environ. Bull., 17, 49–58, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, G., Mu, X., Wen, Z., Wang, F., and Gao, P.:
Soil erosion, conservation, and eco-environment changes in the Loess Plateau of China,
Land Degrad. Dev.,
24, 499–510, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Ziadat, F. and Taimeh, A.:
Effect of rainfall intensity, slope, land use and antecedent soil moisture on soil erosion in an arid environment,
Land Degrad. Dev.,
24, 582–590, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
