<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-7-341-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling the contributing factors of desertification and<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> evaluating their
relationships to the soil degradation<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> process through geomatic techniques</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Modeling the contributing factors of desertification}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~Shoba and S.~S.~Ramakrishnan}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shoba</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          <email>shoba84.geog@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-5123</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ramakrishnan</surname><given-names>S. S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Remote Sensing, Anna University, Chennai, India</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">P. Shoba (shoba84.geog@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>341</fpage><lpage>354</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Desertification is a prolonged type of land degradation which converts the
productive ecosystem to a fragile one by two crucial factors, namely, climate and
negative human intrusion. The present study concentrates on identifying the
causative factors of desertification, namely temperature, wind, rainfall
scarcity and human pressure. It also concentrates on distinguishing the desertified land from
degraded land and assessing the way in which the soil degradation process
becomes accelerated by these factors, by employing data sets such as
meteorological data and Landsat ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Enhanced Thematic Mapper) and OLI (Operational Land Imager) satellite images of the
crop-growing period (June–October) in geostatistical methods and newly proposed
remote sensing models, which yielded good accuracy with in situ observations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The study was centered on two time periods, 2001–2011 (11
years) and 2012–2015 (4 years). In rainfall–temperature/drought-induced
desertified region, the rate of salt-affected soils increased significantly
from 12 to 58 % (2001–2015) due to the presence of native fluoride
concentration and extreme temperature events. The region has also been
experiencing high soil moisture stress (5 to 33 %) because of the
insufficient occurrence of rainfall over a period of time. A longer term
exacerbation of soil moisture stress (19 to 90 %) has been noted in
the areas that were susceptible to wind-induced desertification, due to a high
evaporation rate caused by extreme wind events for a substantial period. High
human-induced soil salinity (36 %), human occupancy (16 %), followed
by moisture stress (7 %) are observed in the human-affected region
because of growing population and improper land management of the land that is already
fragile.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Desertification is defined as the “degradation of the soil, landscape and
bio-productive terrestrial system, in arid, semiarid and subhumid areas
resulting from several factors including climate change and human
activities” (UNCCD, 1994). Desertification is generally perceived as a
“slow” hazard in semiarid regions, initially induced by climatic factors, and
becoming accelerated when combined with human actions (population pressure, intensive
land use, improper land management etc.) and the active state of parent
material prevailing in a longer time frame (Lin and Tang, 2002), which
causes an adverse effect on people and the ecological system. Drought-induced
desertification is aggravated due to the spatiotemporal variations
in rainfall, temperature, wind and solar radiation (D'Odorico et al., 2013)
and human-induced desertification is exacerbated due to the ever-increasing
population, along with food and fodder demand, which results in
socioeconomic pressure on the land (Wang et al., 2010). This situation demonstrates
that desertification is not only a global concern but also a local
problem (Salvati et al., 2013) which has to be addressed in order to
mitigate the desertification process (Fleskens and Stringer, 2014).</p>
      <p>Globally, this phenomenon affects about 1.9 billion hectares of land and 250
million people (Low, 2013). Among many events which affect earth's
environment and ecosystem, drought often has a direct association with
desertification (Shewale and Shravan, 2005). Poor land management during
periods of unusually dry weather can cause loss of vegetation, which in
turn leads to desertification (Sharmia, 2008). Desertification is the end
stage of the land degradation process (Hill et al., 2005) which ultimately
affects the economical and biological productivity of the land (Izzo et al.,
2013) and leads to economical stress to the vulnerable population (Bisaro
et al., 2014) by degrading soil fertility completely.</p>
      <p>Though desertification-inducing factors had an immense negative effect
on many environmental components, soil is a prime component that becomes
deteriorated by the process. Land degradation caused by the removal of
vegetation is perceived as a consequence of soil degradation
(Akhtar-Schuster et al., 2011). Once the physical, chemical and biological
properties of the soils start degrading, natural regeneration is not
possible in a human lifespan (UNCCD, 2012); hence soil is termed
as a nonrenewable resource. Roxo et al. (2001) have defined desertification in relation to soil degradation through the continuous loss of soil fertility
by damage of structure and composition of the soil which ultimately affects
the sustainable agricultural production. Since desertification impacts
soil directly, it is necessary to identify the prime causative
factors which accelerate desertification and evaluate the soil
degradation process which is stimulated by these factors, in order to protect
this precious resource before it loses its capacity entirely.</p>
      <p>Remote sensing technology is successfully applied to the process of
monitoring desert expansion and the assessment of factors that cause
desertification (Hanan et al., 1991). In recent days, a range of
desertification processes has been successfully analyzed and addressed, through the
application of remote sensing techniques (Barbero-Sierra et., 2015; Miao et
al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Torres et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2015; Xu et
al., 2015). The land degradation of arid and semiarid zones, often called
desertification when it is irreversible in form, and the main factors of this
phenomenon being either climate- or human-induced, has been much debated since the mid-1970s
(Rasmussen et al., 2001). Climate fluctuations and human activities together
induce desertification in semiarid regions; their individual impacts should
be assessed in detail in order to resolve the ambiguity over which of them is the
primary cause (Runnstrom, 2003; Wang et al., 2006). Besides rainfall,
temperature and wind are also important climatic factors which can accelerate
desertification through the process of evaporation. Wind speed, combined with
temperature, is a key element to assess the moisture stress
of exposed soil and vegetation in arid and semiarid regions. Soil moisture
stress results from the occurrence of high daytime wind speed (Jacobson,
1999). The higher wind speed does not
help the soil and plants to retain moisture content, and thus contributes
to strong vegetation decline. Weishou et al. (2011) found a strong negative correlation between the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and
mean wind speed, which shows that wind speed and vegetal
degradation effects are dependent on each other.</p>
      <p>The rate of rainfall distribution in the western part of the study region is
hampered by the Western Ghats, as it is situated on the leeward side, which
results in poor vegetal status over a period of time. Therefore the influence of
temperature and wind is expected to be dominant in the western part of the
study region. The condition is reversed in the eastern part of the study
area, where the rate of rainfall is adequate and temperature is
moderate. There have not been many reports that emphasize the identification of the
accelerating factor of desertification by considering wind and temperature
along with NDVI and rainfall so far. This is the first time the spatial
correlation models have been developed with the combination of wind speed,
NDVI and rainfall in order to predict the wind–temperature,
rainfall–temperature (drought) and human-affected regions of
desertification.</p>
      <p>Furthermore the present study identifies and extracts the completely
desertified area from the degraded area with the help of the recent short-term
negative vegetation trend, which was lacking in the previous studies. The
reason behind the incorporation of the recent short-term vegetal trend in the
present study is that “in semiarid regions the ecosystem retains its
consistency and ability to respond to the recurrence of the rainy season”
(Kassas, 1977). If the degraded land does not respond to adequate rain,
the situation is termed as desertification.</p>
      <p>Desertification-inducing factors (temperature-, wind-, rainfall- and human-inducing factors)
have an immense effect on soil fertility in semiarid regions. After the
identification of the causative factors and extraction of desertified lands,
the study also focuses on the crucial and suspected degradation components
invoked by four base factors on the desertified lands that make the soil of
these regions entirely unproductive/irreversible. The study region has
naturally inherited high fluoride content from the groundwater. A positive
correlation between fluoride and pH indicated that alkaline conditions
improved the solubility of fluoride (Adhikary et al., 2014). Hence, the groundwater salinity
has been carried to the subsurface and some surface levels of
the soil through capillary action, and during the extreme temperature event,
the saline water is evaporated and salt remains accumulated. The climatic
factors such as temperature, rainfall and wind have been combined with the active
presence of natural fluoride, which greatly influences the soil
desertification process.</p>
      <p>According to the facts, the theoretical prediction is formulated as the
area that is affected by desertification due to the high
rainfall–temperature/drought factor which should have definitely experienced
soil salinity because of extreme temperatures, native fluoride content and
soil moisture stress at surface and subsurface level (root zone) due to
rainfall scarcity; similarly, the desertified area due to high wind speed would
have experienced soil moisture stress at the surface level.</p>
      <p>Hence the testable directional hypothesis was formed in order to prove the
above-stated theoretical prediction. A directional hypothesis is usually
formed in such a way that predicts the specific relationship between the
components and direction of that relationship. After the execution of
the testable hypothesis, the empirical multispectral models have been proposed
in the current study to extract the soil salinity and moisture stress from
the images with reasonable accuracy.</p>
      <p>The prime objective of the study is (i) to identify and differentiate
different zones of degradation and desertification with respect to
rainfall–temperature/drought, wind and anthropogenic factors using a geostatistical model; (ii) to form the hypothesis in such a way that
proves the theoretical prediction of what soil degradation process can be expected
from each zone of desertification; (iii) to quantify and assess the possible
soil degradation processes, namely soil moisture stress and salinity, at
surface and subsurface levels through remote sensing models and techniques;
(iv) to validate the work to assure the reliability of the geostatistical
and remote sensing models through in situ observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study region and prevailing problems</title>
      <p>Dharmapuri is located in the northwestern climate zone of Tamil Nadu, India.
It lies between 11<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>33<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 76<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. The annual
potential evapotranspiration rate in this region is 1727 mm, compared to
annual precipitation of 825 mm. It is a dry and semiarid production system
(Fig. 1). The study region has been facing a maximum temperature of about
37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the months of April–May. Rhodustalfs, Ustropepts and Rhodic
Paleustalfs (Soil Survey Staff, 2014)
are the dominate soil taxa found in the site with a high presence of loam and
clay which stimulates the capillary action while experiencing high
temperature. Sorghum, finger millet and little millet are the major field
crops of the Dharmapuri district, whose spatial distribution is about
34 000 ha, which supports 70 % of the population. The socio-economic
condition of the region is very poor due to poor rainfall and frequent
monsoon failure, thus leading to drought in many parts of the region
(Anbazhagan et al., 2000).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Study area – Dharmapuri district of Tamil Nadu, India. It is a
typical example of semiarid regions across the world where 70 % of
the population rely on dry land agriculture. The annual evapotranspiration
rate exceeds the rate of rainfall because of its locality under rain-shadow
region of the Western Ghats. Prevalence of extreme temperatures, native fluoride in nature and unsustainable agricultural practices have caused the region to
experience drought, which often leads to desertification.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The district also faces strong salinization, affecting 2 % of land.
About 1 % of land is affected by waterlogging and it is proved with the
presence of hard pans (Fig. 5e). The entire region suffers from water scarcity
and out of five taluks, four are over-exploited (Central Ground water Board
Report, 2009). The presence of fluoride is more than the permissible limit (above
1.5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the study region (Sendesh et al., 2011; Ramesh and Vennila,
2012). A positive correlation between fluoride concentration and pH indicated
that alkaline conditions improved the solubility of fluoride (Adhikary et al.,
2014a). Groundwater in aquifers in general is slightly alkaline in nature
(Central Ground water Board Report, 2009). The erratic climatic events,
socioeconomic developments and unsustainable agricultural practices in the
past decades exert strong pressure on the fertile land of the study region.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Satellite data</title>
      <p>Since MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) and NOAA AVHRR satellites have high temporal resolution, they
have been adopted for long-term change detection, land degradation and
desertification analysis so far by various researchers across the world.
However, the limiting factor which hinders the applicability to employ those images
in the subregional-level assessment is their low spatial resolution. Therefore,
moderate spatial resolution with long-term temporally available images are
required to assess the phenomena at subregional level. Landsat satellite
images have the longest spatial record for land observation (Williams et
al., 2006). Therefore, the present study is carried out using ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Enhanced
Thematic Mapper) and OLI (Operational Land Imager) images on board Landsat
7 and 8 Mission from 2000 to 2015. A total of eight bands starting from 30 blue
(0.441–0.514 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to 15 m panchromatic (0.515–0.896 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) of the
electromagnetic spectrum are utilized in the ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mission, whereas the
arrangements and the inclusions of bands are slightly modified in the OLI
mission. Band 1 is a deep blue band for coastal/aerosol studies and band 11
is a shortwave infrared band for cirrus detection in the OLI mission.</p>
      <p>The two satellites are in a sun-synchronous, near-polar orbit at 705 km
altitude and have the moderate spatial resolution of 30 m for multispectral
bands. ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> data of path no. 143 path and row no. 52 were collected from
2001 to 2012 and OLI images were collected from 2013 to 2015 from the Glovis
online free resource center. Bands were stacked and the subset operation was
performed in order to clip the images with respect to the study area. From
2004–2012 the Landsat 7 mission acquired the data using the Scan Line
Corrector (SLC) off mode. SLC images were collected for the corresponding
years, spatially corrected using focal analysis and spectrally equalized
using a histogram equalization method to prepare the data for further
geospatial analysis as illustrated below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Meteorological data and desertification phase identification</title>
      <p>Daily meteorological data sets such as rainfall, minimum temperature, maximum
temperature, wind speed, solar radiation and relative humidity from
2001 to 2015 have been collected from Centre for Climate Change and Adaptation
Research, Anna University, India. Dharmapuri is one of the districts of Tamil
Nadu, India, which is affected by the kharif season or southwest monsoon rain
(June–October). Therefore, the crop growth is considerably high from June to
October. There are six meteorological stations, distributed in and around the
study region. Plotted points are interpolated using the inverse distance
weighting method with same resolution (30 m cell size) as the Landsat data. The
minimum temperature, maximum temperature, wind speed, solar radiation,
relative humidity and rainfall raster of different months of growing season
are then averaged to obtain the mean values of growing season of each year.</p>
      <p>Land degradation to desertification phase identification plays a vital role
before an assessment of desertification can begin. The phase can be
initially identified through rainfall and temperature distribution. The time
span of land degradation/drought has to be identified in order to recognize
the progress of desertification. From 2006 to 2011 there was a significant
decline in rainfall and increment in temperature followed by sudden, high
rainfall which occurred in 2012 (Fig. 2). Therefore, the land degradation
probably occurred in the 2006–2011 time frame.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Climate diagram for one of the meteorological stations (Nallampalli
12.34<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 77.88<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) of the study region at 349 m elevation –
rainfall vs. temperature for the crop-growing period (June–October) from
2001 to 2015. The significant drought period was observed from 2006 to 2011,
followed by adequate rainfall distribution (2012–2015) which is appropriate
for crop production. If the degraded land (2006–2011) is not renewed or
regenerated after receiving sufficient rainfall, which occurred from 2012 to 2015,
then the situation is termed as desertification, otherwise it is just seen as degraded land.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Soil degradation has a more direct relationship with desertification than other
environmental parameters. The degraded soil cannot be reversed when the
natural degradation component and anthropogenic activities are prolonged for
more than a decade. There are many soil degradation processes which are
irreversible in nature and may have a direct association with
desertification. If the degraded soil is not regenerated from the high
rainfall that began in 2012 and continued until 2015 (4 years), then it is
termed as soil desertification, otherwise it is just seen as degradation.</p>
      <p>The research question arose here as follow. By which component have the soil
desertification processes been accelerated? The research question was
answered by formulating the hypothesis. Soil salinity and soil moisture
stress is hypothesized in the study region based on the climatic prevalence
(less rainfall and fewer extreme temperature events), geological functions (nature of the parent
material – fluoride concentration) and human pressure. The soil
desertification processes which were active during both the periods were
analyzed, quantified and extracted with respect to the prime inducing
components (temperature-, wind-, rainfall- and human-inducing components) after the successful
execution of the hypothesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>NDVI topographical normalization</title>
      <p>Before estimating the NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), the
bands of the images have to be topographically normalized in order to
eliminate the effects from the shadowed region on NDVI images. Bands 3 and 4 of
ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and OLI are topographically normalized using modified cosine
correction (Meyer et al., 1993) to eliminate the illumination variation which
hampers the ability to discriminate ground features, as the same features
will have different spectral responses among shadowed and non-shadowed
regions. It is very important to eliminate the topographical effects in the
present study as the correlation analysis is highly affected by the shadow
region. For instance, the water body in the NDVI and rainfall have no
correlation over a period of time, thus the result of the correlation
analysis should be zero in those places. Some locations in the eastern part
of the region are covered by shadow because of the presence of vegetation
(2 %) on the elevated terrain. Due to the presence of vegetation and
the occurrence of moderate rainfall, the area has to be shown as highly
correlated. However, the shadow region is considered as a water body by the model
because of the spectral coincidence of shadow region and water body, and the
resultant correlation is zero (no correlation). Hence the shadowed vegetation
has a high possibility of being wrongly estimated as having no correlation if the
topographical effects are not eliminated. After applying the normalization to
the bands, the eastern and western parts (hilly region) of the NDVI have been
well enhanced.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Spatial regression model</title>
      <p>A strong linear trend was identified between the NDVI and 3-months' cumulative
rainfall (Nicholson et al., 1990). Since the rainfall and NDVI follows a linear
trend, the spatial linear regression model is formulated by taking rainfall as an
independent variable and NDVI as a regressed parameter. The regression
analysis has been performed for each year from 2001 to 2011 after computing
the slope and intercept for each pixel, in order to yield the result of a longer
term NDVI that should have been present in the study region with respect to
rainfall; hence it is called NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Spatial correlation coefficient model</title>
      <p>In order to identify the negatively correlated area where the vegetation
stress is dependent on wind speed, the spatial correlation coefficient
analyses is done for a longer term mean wind speed and mean predicted NDVI
(NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6b). Since the western part of the region is
located on the leeward side, the land degradation process is significantly
influenced by the prevalence of wind and high temperature events. Thus, the
correlation coefficient analysis is again performed between temperature and
wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the negatively correlated zones of the wind
speed–NDVI combination. This step is required in order to extract the
combined effect (temperature- and wind-affected) zones of land degradation and
desertification.</p>
      <p>The region of positive correlation (wind speed–NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
an indication of the condition where the vegetation has been resisted even
after experiencing a high evaporation rate due to the occurrence of adequate
rainfall. The spatial correlation coefficient analysis was again performed
between Rainfall<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the positively
correlated area of wind speed–NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> which resulted in
places of positive, negative and no correlation. Positive correlation
indicates the NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of this region is well correlated with
rainfall. If some degradation is noticed in NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>observed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, that is
solely due to rainfall. Degradation occurring in negatively correlated places
(NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with rainfall) is the indication of human
activities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Scatter plot – Thermal IR Vs NDVI – Diagrammatic
approximation of the distribution – Diagonal from extreme wet edge 1 to
extreme dry edge 4. <bold>(b)</bold> Three zones of scatter plot such as healthy
zone with maximum NDVI and low temperature, soil moisture stress zone which
keeps on increasing with increasing diagonal distance from wet edge and
saline zone at the extreme portion of the rectangle where the temperature is
high and NDVI is almost zero. <bold>(c)</bold> Linear regression between Diagonal
Soil Moisture Stress Index (DSMSI) and Tasseled Cap wetness index (TCW)
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.782</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to ensure the theoretical reliability of the
result. <bold>(d)</bold> Linear regression between DSMSI and in situ observations
agrees with good accuracy (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.804</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the model.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{NDVI${}_{\text{normalized}}$ trend analysis}?><title>NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>normalized</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend analysis</title>
      <p>A statistically significant negative slope in the NDVI time series is an
indicator of degradation (Wessels et al., 2007). The long-term vegetation
stress can be well identified and monitored by NDVI data and thus used for
desertification assessment (Kundu and Dutta, 2011). The time trend analysis
has been performed for a longer term NDVI to identify the spatiotemporal
gradual and sudden changes in the vegetation condition of the study region
over a period of time. Both a longer term (2001–2011) (Fig. 6a) and a short-term
(2012–2015) trend have been estimated spatially for maximum NDVI.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <title>LULC (land use and land cover mapping) (2001, 2005, 2010 and
2014)</title>
      <p>At a regional level, both supervised and unsupervised classification works
well for extracting soil salinity (Naseri, 1998). Supervised classification was
performed for Landsat Satellite images of 2001, 2005, 2010 and 2014 in
order to classify the saline, non-saline soils, wetlands and human
structures. Maximum likelihood algorithm has been implemented in the
supervised classification. About 50 in situ observations are used as samples
for training the system to classify the images. The Level 1 land cover types,
namely, forest region, agricultural land, wetland, built-up, barren land and
water body were identified in the study region with the help of ground
knowledge. The overall accuracy of the work was verified through confusion
matrix, and the attained accuracy of the classification was 91 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9">
  <title>Diagonal Soil Moisture Stress Index (DSMSI)</title>
      <p>Few authors like Moren et al. (1994), Sandholt et al. (2002) and Shafian and
Mass (2015) have proved the potential of the triangle and trapezoidal model on
temperature–vegetation scatter plot in the extraction of soil moisture
with adequate accuracy level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.703). The study region probably faced soil
moisture stress due to low rainfall distribution, high
wind speed and extreme temperature events during the crop-growing period from
2006 to 2011. Based on the pattern of the scatter plot of NDVI and TIR (thermal
IR) band (Fig. 3a), we proposed the new empirical model called DSMSI with the
association of wind speed to increase the accuracy and reliability of the
soil moisture stress.</p>
      <p>The distribution pattern of NDVI with respect to the TIR band follows a shape
of an inclined rectangle. From the rectangle we found two wet edges and two dry
edges based on their position on the scatter plot. Edge 1 and 2 are wet
edges; 3 and 4 are dry edges. The diagonal line is formed from edge 1 to
4, as edge 1 is extremely wet compared to edge 2, and 4 is extremely dry
compared to edge 3. The wetness or moisture decreases with increasing
diagonal distance (Eq. 1) from extreme wet edge 1.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Diagonal   Distance</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>TIR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The diagonal distance has an inverse relationship with NDVI and direct
correlation with wind speed. As shown in Fig. 3b the perpendicular line (a)
erected from extreme wet (edge 1) to the line of edges 2–4. The pixels
located at the left side of the line denote healthy vegetation because of the
high NDVI value and low temperature. Similarly, the perpendicular line (b) is
again erected from the extremely dry edge 4 to the line of edges 1–3. The pixels
located on the right side of the line are extremely dry, thus termed as
saline-affected soils. The pixels located in between the line a and b, depict
the level of soil moisture stress. Hence, the scatter zone has been divided
into three parts, namely healthy vegetation (zone 1), soil moisture stress
(zone 2) and saline zone with moisture stress (zone 3). Therefore, there is strong
convergence between soil moisture stress and salinity in the extreme
diagonal zone. To reduce the misinterpretation between zone 2 and 3 and to
increase the veracity of the DSMSI model in terms of soil moisture stress,
the extreme portions of the resultant values are avoided and the most
influential parameter of moisture stress, wind speed, was included in the
equation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> The Diagonal Soil Salinity Index (DSSI) model confirms
theoretical accuracy with Tasseled Cap brightness index (TCB) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.863</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> The linear regression between DSSI and surface electrical
conductivity (EC) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.803</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) which ensures the ground reliability of
the model.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Like temperature, the wind speed also influences the moisture content in the
surface soil, which is not considered in the previous studies. Since the
diagonal distance or moisture stress is inversely proportional to NDVI and
directly proportional to wind speed, the model has been formed as shown in
Eq. (2). TIR band and average wind speed data of the growing period were
normalized before feeding them into the equation. Soil moisture stress maps of
4 years (2001, 2005, 2010 and 2014) have been mapped using the DSMSI model
(Eq. 2). The DSMSI model is a function of NDVI, TIR and Wind speed.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DSMSI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>TIR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ndvi</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="." close="]"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where
DSMSI is the Diagonal Soil Moisture Stress Index (%),
TIR<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th pixel of normalized TIR band,
ndvi<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum value of NDVI,
ndvi<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th pixel of NDVI and ws<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th pixel of
normalized wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The values of the model vary from 0 to 100 in which 0 indicates sufficient
moisture content in the soil, 100 indicates the extreme dryness and
intermediate values illustrates the moisture stress severity levels. Soil is
said to be stress-affected if DSMSI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≧</mml:mi><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. DSMSI model has been
regressed with TCW<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ETM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tasseled Cap wetness index) (Guo et al.,
2011) in order to initially assess the theoretical reliability of the result; it yielded a best fit with TCW (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.782</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 3c).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS10">
  <title>Extraction of saline-affected soil</title>
      <p>Saline soils are very difficult to identify because of their dynamic nature.
Dry areas are naturally prone to soil salinization due to a lower rate of
rainfall and high evaporation which limits the leaching of salts, and this
effect is expected to be magnified when it is combined with humans' negative
intrusion like the over-fertilization of farmland (Metternicht and Zinck,
2009). Allbed et al. (2014) found that the Salinity Index (SI) and red band
(band 3) have significant correlation with electrical conductivity (EC).
Though much research has been carried out in the field of soil salinity
identification so far, through various models like SI, Normalized Differential
Salinity Index (NDSI) etc., an extraction of soil salinity still needs more
accuracy because of the confusion created from the same spectral signature
values of settlement roofs and saline-affected zones in the study region.
Therefore, additional independent variables have to be involved in the analysis in order
to reduce the places of uncertainty. Abdul-Qadir and Benni (2010) found that
the mid-infrared (mid-IR) band has shown high correlation between SI and NDSI. Saline soils make
it difficult for the plant to absorb the moisture content present in the soil, which
results in soil moisture stress, especially at the root zone. Therefore, zone 3
(salinity-induced moisture stress) (Fig. 3b) in the present study is solely
considered as saline-affected.</p>
      <p>Since the diagonal distance of the scatter plot (Fig. 3a) had a similar
relationship with soil salinity as the salinity increases with increasing
diagonal distance, the same model was used in association with the mid-IR band
for deriving a new model, named the Diagonal Soil Salinity Index (DSSI), which
has increased the accuracy of extracting surface soil salinity with moisture
stress at the extreme ranges. Inclusion of the mid-IR band in the model has
significantly reduced the effect of building roofs on extracting salinity.</p>
      <p>Spectral plot of the study region shows that the saline-affected region can
be separated from the settlements from the 0.7 to 1 (after normalization) range in
the mid-IR region. Low organic matter exhibits higher reflectance in the
mid-IR region rather than the settlements. The diagonal distance of the
right-angled triangle, observed from the extreme corner of the scatter plot of
mid-IR and NDVI, was considered as a saline line where the salinity increases
with increasing distance from an apex point (NDVI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 and
mid-IR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7). The negative values of the model were eliminated in the
analysis, as the saline-affected regions maintain the range above 0.7 in the
mid-IR region and below 0.5 in NDVI.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DSSI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mtext>TIR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MIR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ndvi</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Since the study region is expected to experience soil salinity because of the
fluoride origin and extreme temperature event, surface level soil salinity
was derived for the years 2001, 2005, 2010 and 2014 using the DSSI model (Eq. 3) as it yielded a best fit with TCB (Tasseled Cap
brightness index) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 4a).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Hypothesis combinations, computed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values with 1 % level of
significance, corresponding probability (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> score) and decision taken based
on the tabulated values.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Serial no.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hypothesis variables</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Degrees of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Decision</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">freedom</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temperature–salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.645</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">High</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">significance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wind speed–moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.576</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">High</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stress</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">significance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rainfall–moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.248</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">High</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">presence</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">significance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS11">
  <title>Testable directional hypothesis</title>
      <p>The directional hypothesis was formed in such a way that proves the expected
direction of relationship between temperature–salinization, wind–soil
moisture stress and rainfall–moisture stress at 0.05 % confidence
level. Based on the hypothesis, the rejection area, i.e., the area of high
correlation existence between the variables, has been extracted for each case
and shown in Table 1. For the temperature–salinity combination, the computed
value of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> statistic (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.645</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is higher than the tabulated one (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.482</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
at the 0.05 level of confidence, and this statement confirms the adequacy of the
positive correlation between salinity and temperature. As anticipated, the
salinity is a predominant degradation process in temperature/drought-affected
zone. Likewise, other combinations have also proven its adequacy for higher
correlation. The rainfall–moisture stress combination <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.248) fell in
the negative region of the histogram as the moisture stress is
negatively correlated with rainfall.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS12">
  <title>In situ observations</title>
      <p>In situ measurements are taken (Fig. 5b) for the chemical characteristics of
the soil such as soil salinity, EC, pH, temperature
and soil moisture at 100 locations in and around the study region using EI
Deep Vision water and soil analysis equipment (Model 161). A questionnaire
was also conducted with the inhabitants of the study region, along
with the field measurements, in order to be familiarized with the socioeconomic
condition of the people, their land management practices and their awareness
towards land degradation processes. Soil samples were collected at both surface
and subsurface level (1 m) (Fig. 5f) and dissolved with groundwater of
that region in order to facilitate the process of measuring chemical
parameters as listed in Table 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Questionnaire with a local farmer. <bold>(b)</bold> Direct in situ measurement to evaluate the chemical properties of the soil.
<bold>(c)</bold> Highly saline-affected region. <bold>(d)</bold> Soil moisture stress
zone. <bold>(e)</bold> Land reclamation process hampered by the presence
of hard pans. <bold>(f)</bold> Soil samples collected for testing the chemical
properties.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Oleander (<italic>Nerium Oleander</italic> L.) is the only shrub planted in this
affected region so as to withstand salinity. With this information, we
discriminated salinity even under the vegetation while classifying Landsat
images. Facts observed during the survey include the point that due to the migration of native people
for their economic needs, the land was left abandoned for years on end
which kept increasing the salinity with the absence of land management
practices. In addition to that, farmers keep spending money on land
reclamation, more than what they can get in return from the land, without
knowing the actual condition/productivity of the land. In the dry areas, drip
irrigation is practiced to achieve the needs of the growing population at
times of insufficient rainfall. Human activities such as real estate and urbanization more generally has started intruding the agricultural land which substantially
affects the productive ecosystem.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Statistical measure of the chemical parameters at sampled locations
(33 per region). EC and salinity follow positive correlation with pH in the
alkaline range (&gt; 7). The moisture content is below 35 % in
all three zones of desertification. In the drought-affected region the higher
salinity is found at the subsurface level because of the fluoride concentration
in groundwater. We found that the inverse relationship in human-induced
desertified zone, i.e., the surface salinity, is higher than the subsurface
and the standard deviation (SD) of surface-level salinity is lesser than the
subsurface, which indicates that the human-induced salinity is not
fluctuating at surface level because of the constant application of
fertilizers for more than 2 decades. A high extent of surface-level soil moisture
stress (90 %) is observed in the wind-induced desertified regions.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>properties</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Rainfall–temperature/ </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">Human-induced  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col13" align="center">Wind-induced  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">drought-induced </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">desertified region </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col13" align="center">desertified region </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">desertified region </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col13" align="center">  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">Surface </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Subsurface </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Surface </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">Subsurface </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">Surface </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center">Subsurface </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">level </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">level </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">level </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">level </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="center">level </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col12" nameend="col13" align="center">level </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">7.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(mS cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(ppt)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">32.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">31.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Wind–temperature-induced degradation</title>
      <p>From the spatial correlation analysis between a longer term mean wind speed
and mean predicted NDVI (Fig. 6b), we found that 46 % (192 395 ha) of
land is negatively correlated, 48 % (199 526 ha) of land is positively
correlated and 6 % (21 846 ha) is experiencing no correlation because
of the stable NDVI over a period of time. The negatively correlated area is
the direct illustration of NDVI reduction due to the high wind speed over a
period of time. The land degradation due to wind speed is identified if the negative
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>observed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend (Fig. 6a) is observed in the negatively
correlated area. The high correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is observed
between wind speed and temperature in the wind-induced degraded regions; hence
the zone is termed as wind–temperature-induced degraded zone. Therefore, the
temperature- and wind-induced degraded area has been identified from the
analysis. Among 192 395 ha, 26 % (51 252.93 ha) of land parcel was
affected by wind.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Long-term mean NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>observed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend. Area of no
correlation in <bold>(b)</bold> is exactly coincided with no change area <bold>(a)</bold> i.e this is the place of no correlation between wind speed and NDVI due to
the presence of stable/undisturbed NDVI over a period of time. <bold>(b)</bold>
Correlation coefficient map for wind speed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>predicted  mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 11 years. Eastern (low wind speed and high
NDVI) and western parts (High wind speed and low NDVI) of the study region
have been experiencing high negative correlation over a period of time. <bold>(c)</bold>
Distribution of degraded land with respect to three crucial causative
factors, namely drought, wind and human. <bold>(d)</bold> Distribution
of desertified land extracted from degraded zones after the assessment with
the short-term NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>observed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend (2012–2015). Western areas of the
region display combined effects of drought and wind. Though the eastern part
receives adequate rain and experiences moderate temperature and wind, which is
appropriate for vegetation production, the distribution of desertified land
is higher due to anthropogenic activities.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Rainfall–temperature/drought and human-induced degradation</title>
      <p>The positively correlated area of wind speed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mean</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pred</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the consistency of the vegetation even after
experiencing high wind speed due to the steady rate of rainfall over a
period of time. Therefore if the degradation is suspected to occur in this region,
it is mainly due to rainfall and temperature or human factors. Rainfall and
temperature/drought-induced degradation was identified if the negative
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>observed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is observed in the positively correlated area of
rainfall and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pred</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Similarly, human-induced degradation was identified if the negative
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>observed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is observed in the negatively correlated area.
The human-induced degradation cannot be directly acquired from the
geostatistical model because of its dynamic nature. Once the possible
climatic degradations (wind, rainfall and temperature) were extracted from
the correlation analysis, the remaining area (positive correlation between
wind speed and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pred</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; negative correlation between rainfall and
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pred</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreasing NDVI trend) is identified as being human-affected.
The vegetal status of this region is low because of the human intrusion.
Among 199 526 ha, 46 % (93 138.12 ha) are affected by insufficient
rainfall and extreme temperature event and 21 % (42 184.26 ha) are
affected by human intrusion. Figure 6c depicts the degraded zones with
respect to wind–temperature, rainfall–temperature/drought and human factors.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Land degradation to desertification</title>
      <p>As discussed earlier, in this study, if the degraded land is not responding
well to the sufficient rainfall, then the situation is termed as desertification.
Desertified land area is identified by considering the short-term NDVI
(2012–2015) trend when the rainfall rate is sufficient for the plant growth.
Desertified area has been extracted where the degraded land is still facing a
negative short-term NDVI trend. About 70 % (121 179.15 ha) of the
degraded land would have been wrongly identified as desertified land if the
short-term NDVI trend had not been included in the analysis. The research found
that 15 % of the total area (439 189.71 ha) is in a desertified state.
Figure 6d illustrates the three zones of desertification due to
wind–temperature, rainfall–temperature and human events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Areal extent of soil moisture and soil salinity for
drought-affected zone from 2001 to 2015, in which the growth of saline-affected regions is in high proportion compared to the moisture-affected regions due to
native fluoride content and clayey soil origin. <bold>(b)</bold> Areal extent of
soil moisture and salinity in wind-affected zone from 2001 to 2015. The soil
moisture stress has been accelerated in the wind-affected zone, rather than the
salinity. <bold>(c)</bold> Soil salinity, moisture stress and human occupancy are
together observed in the human-affected region from 2001 to 2015. Human
settlements are elevated at a higher rate, followed by man-made salinity and
soil moisture stress. <bold>(d)</bold> The overall rate of soil degradation processes
at the study region irrespective of the causative factors.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Soil degradation process induced by wind–temperature,
rainfall–temperature/drought and human intrusion</title>
      <p>The soil degradation process, invoked by the four crucial factors, is recognized
in the present study as soil is the predominant component which becomes
deteriorated by the process. Red gravelly clay soil is predominately found
in the drought-affected region. The fine pores of clay-like soil have a great
ability to retain the water through capillary action. Therefore, the soil of the
drought-affected region has naturally inherited high fluoride content
from the groundwater through capillary action. During times of extreme
temperatures, the saline water in the subsurface and some surface levels of the
soil evaporates and salt remains accumulated, as cited earlier.
Higher fluoride content and extreme pH have high positive correlation and
thus enable the water and soil to experience salinity (Adhikary et al.,
2014b).</p>
      <p>In the drought-affected zone the soil salinity should have been accelerated due
to native fluoride concentration on groundwater, a high evaporation rate
induced by temperature and the absence of the leaching process because of the
inadequate amount of rainfall over a period of time. As hypothesized, the
drought-induced desertified area should have been strongly affected by
salinity. Higher salinity hinders the vegetation growth and thus supports the
water erosion and saline leaching process during the occurrence of extreme
rain soon after a longer period of insufficient rainfall, which happened in 2012.
Surface-level soil salinity was estimated for 2001, 2005, 2010 and 2015 using
the DSSI model as it yielded a best fit with ground truth measurements
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.803) (Fig. 4b). The area of soil salinity has been significantly
increased from 12 to 58 % in the drought-affected regions compared to the area
of soil moisture stress (5 to 33 %) from 2001 to 2015. The soil moisture
stress has also been activated severely in surface and root zones
(subsurface), especially in the 2006 to 2011 time frame, and this effect still
had an elevated rate from 2012 to 2015. Though the soil moisture stress is being
steadily increased due to high temperature prevalence and rainfall
insufficiency, the increment rate of surface salinity is exceeding at an
unexpected rate over a period of time (Fig. 7a).</p>
      <p>Hence, the initial prediction has proved that the drought-affected zone
should have emphatically experienced a higher level of soil salinity than other
soil degradation factors. From the ground truth observations it was noticed
that the subsurface salinity or EC was significantly higher (mean
6.5 mS cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the surface salinity (mean 4.2 mS cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
the drought-affected zone. The distribution of salinity follows a continuous
pattern in the drought- and wind-affected region (climate-influenced region).
The low rainfall will decrease the decomposition rate in the soil, thereby
reducing the nutrient content in the rainfall-affected regions. Therefore, nutrient
losses are observed in this region along with soil moisture stress from
in situ observations.</p>
      <p>Based on the directional hypothesis, the wind–temperature-affected region is
expected to experience soil moisture stress at the surface level. Therefore, the
further component, the surface soil moisture stress, was extracted for 2001, 2005, 2010
and 2015 through the DSMSI model, and it yielded a best fit
with in situ observations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.804) (Fig. 3d). The area of surface
soil moisture stress increased constantly (19 to 90 %) from 2001 to 2015
in the region where wind is the predominant inducing factor. Soil salinity in
these regions fluctuated at a somewhat lower rate (8 % in 2001,
9 % in 2005, 7 % in 2010 and 6 % in 2015) and that too is due to
native fluoride content. During the degradation phase from 2006 to 2011, we
found that a higher rate (63 %) of soil moisture stress had been caused by the
wind (Fig. 7b). As hypothesized, the area of soil moisture stress (Fig. 7) in
the wind–temperature-induced desertified region (18 052 ha) is
comparatively higher than the drought-induced (9161 ha) and human-induced (1042 ha)
region.</p>
      <p>Though the levels of moisture stress and salinity were obtained at surface level
effectively in the drought- and wind-affected region using the DSMSI and DSSI
model, we could not model the subsurface moisture stress and salinity as we
have dealt with multispectral images which do not have surface penetration
capacity. The DSMSI model is only applicable for dry conditions/the leeward side
of mountain regions where the occurrence of rainfall is majorly hampered
by the augmentation of wind speed and temperature. Conversely, the model is not
applicable to the areas where the (i) rate of urbanization is high; (ii) the
soil is waterlogged in a higher proportion; (iii) there is an active presence of
water bodies. Similarly, the DSSI model is also applicable for dry conditions and
not suitable for waterlogging situations. Therefore, the model was only employed
in climate-affected regions (drought- and wind-affected region).</p>
      <p>The consequences of the above two declared factors of desertification, namely
drought and wind, are slow and can be suspected and quantified with respect to
past, current and future prediction models as they solely depend on climatic
variables. But the third factor, human activities, causes an adverse
effect on the land in an unexpected and rapid manner and cannot be predicted
in advance. According to Vieira et al. (2015) human activities are the
predominant factor for desertification expansion. In the case of human-affected regions, the salinity was measured from LULC maps, not from the
model, as the uncertainty developed from the distribution of Oleander
(<italic>Nerium Oleander</italic> L.) plants on the saline track (mentioned in
Sect. 2.13) and waterlogging condition. The human-induced desertified
regions were affected by salinity, human occupancy followed by moisture
stress (Fig. 7d).</p>
      <p>Human-induced salinity increased by 9 % in the degradation phase and
becomes accelerated in the desertification phase (14 %). About 5 % of the
saline track increased in the desertification phase. Dissolved
nitrate is the main source for the concentration of fluoride in the groundwater. There is no evidence for the geological source of nitrate (Ramesh and
Vennila, 2012) in the human-induced desertified region. Therefore, it was
resultant from human activities. The surface EC values are higher than the
subsurface in the human-affected region. The fact may be supported by the
opinions obtained by local farmers (Fig. 5a) that the long-term application
of fertilizers for more than 2 decades raises the salinity in the soil
more than the fluoride does. In the human-affected regions, extreme surface
salinity is observed in few low-lying areas (Fig. 5c), because of the
leaching of fertilizers from surrounding elevated areas. The distribution of
salinity is discrete in the human-affected regions. Hence, the substantial
increment of salinity in the human-affected zone was due to the high
application of fertilizers on land that is already fragile to achieve a high production
rate, more than its sustainable capacity in order to support the growing
population.</p>
      <p>Furthermore the human occupancy has significantly increased from 2001 to
2015, particularly in the degradation period (2006–2011). This is due to the
increment of population (8 %) from 2001 to 2011 (Fig. 8) in the human-affected region. Population growth of the other regions (temperature/drought
affected, rainfall-affected and wind-affected) has followed a decreasing trend
from 2001 to 2011, which is the direct illustration of migration of the
inhabitants to urbanized areas due to the prevalence of drought in these
years. About 38 % of decadal growth (2001–2011) of the population was
particularly observed in the urban areas of the study region (Census of
India, 2011). Therefore, during the aridity stage, human pressure should have
started on the agricultural land in order to support the growing population
or attain financial security, as the agricultural practice was not very feasible in the period. Figure 7d depicts the rate of increment of
salinity and urbanization. Soil moisture stress had little effect in the
human-affected region, which only increases by 1 % during the degradation
phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Population trend of three zones of desertification from 1991 to 2011.
The population trend has been significantly increased (8 %) from
2001 to 2011 in the human-induced desertified zone, where as in the
temperature/drought, wind and rainfall-affected zone, it follows a decreasing
trend. This is because of the migration of the inhabitants towards urbanized
area in order to stabilize their economical needs during drought period.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/341/2016/se-7-341-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The standard deviation of subsurface EC and salinity is significantly
higher (1.46 and 1.49) than the surface level which shows that the values of the
salinity are highly fluctuating at the subsurface level (Table 1)
particularly in the human-affected zone. Hence, the DSSI model has yielded poor
accuracy for the subsurface level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particularly in the human-affected region. This is because of the leaching of salts due to the
application of excess amount of fertilizers for more than 2 decades.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The proposed study focused on four driving forces such as temperature-, wind-,
rainfall- and human-induced factors for the assessment of land degradation and
desertification with the aid of an appropriate geostatistical model. The
successful directional hypothesis has assisted the research in the identification of the
highly influential soil degradation process in all three affected zones.
From the new perspective of assessment, appropriate models can be
applied to the area based on the predicted soil degradation process,
because we cannot apply a soil erosion model to a region which has been
affected by salinity over the years. However, some limitations are
demonstrated in the present work which have to be improved upon in future
research. (1) The wind-affected region would have also faced strong wind erosion, but
only soil moisture stress was studied. (2) Either soil salinity or soil
moisture is extracted at surface level only, but in the study area, the
salinity has been inherited from the groundwater and it is expected to be
present at the subsurface level too, which cannot be measured by multispectral
remote sensing models. (3) A study of soil textural variations would increase
the reliability of the results. (4) Human activities are studied through LULC
maps, but the incorporation of overgrazing and an excessive yield estimation
model may increase the quality of the work. (5) Since soil salinity, soil
moisture stress and hard pans are the dominant features present in the
surface and subsurface levels, recent advanced technology like microwave
remote sensing should be employed in order to quantify the salinity regions
accurately. Because of the potentiality of all weathers, the capability of surface penetration
and the response towards the electrical properties of the target,
microwave remote sensing is able to provide adequate ground for
extracting the surface and subsurface salinity and moisture compared to other
methods such as optical and multispectral remote sensing.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to express our sincere thanks to Department of Science and
Technology, India, for the financial support (grant no. DST/Inspire
Fellowship/2013/1109/IF131152), without which we would not have been able to purchase
the required instruments and data to carry out the research work.</p><p>We thank the Centre for Climate Change and Adaptation Research, Anna University, for
providing the meteorological data on time, and we are also thankful to the USGS for their free distribution of long-term
Landsat images through the online data portal.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Cerdà</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdul-Qadir, A. M. H. and Benni, T. J.: Monitoring and evaluation of soil
salinity in term of spectral response using Landsat images and GIS in
Mesopotamian plain/Iraq, Journal of Iraqi Desert Studies, 2, 19–32, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adhikary, P. P., Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., and Singh, D. K.: Hydrochemical
characterization and spatial distribution of fluoride in groundwater of
Delhi state, India, Indian J. Soil Conserv., 42, 170–173, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Akhtar-Schuster, M., Thomas, R. J., Stringer, L. C., Chasek, P., and Seely,
M.: Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation:
Institutional, financial, legal and science-policy challenges and solutions,
Land Degrad. Dev., 22, 299–312,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Allbed, A., Kumar, L., and Sinha, P.: Mapping and Modelling Spatial
Variation in Soil Salinity in the Al Hassa Oasis Based on Remote Sensing
Indicators and Regression Techniques, Remote Sens., 6, 1137–1157, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Anbazhagan, S., Palpandian, P., Jothibasu, A., Uma Maheswaran, S.,
Venkatesan, A., and Ramesh, V.: GIS spatial analysis for artificial recharge
– a case study from drought prone area, in: Water Management – Historical
Perspective and Development, edited by: Anbazhagan, S., Vasagan Publication,
ISBN: 978-93-83188-01-7, 107–133, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barbero-Sierra, C., Marques, M. J., Ruiz-Pérez, M., Escadafal, R., and
Exbrayat, W.: How is Desertification Research Addressed in Spain? Land Versus
Soil Approaches, Land Degrad. Dev., 26,
423–432, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bisaro, A., Kirk, M., Zdruli, P., and Zimmermann, W.: Global Drivers setting
Desertification research priorities: Insights from a stakeholder
consultation forum, Land Degrad. Dev., 25, 5–16, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Census of India: Provisional population Totals – Rural and Urban
Distribution, Paper 2, volume 1, series 34, office of the Registrar General
&amp; Census Commissioner, India, Data Product No.00-004-2011-Cen-Book(E),
available at:
<uri>http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/prov_results_paper2_india.html</uri> (last access: 1
November 2015), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Central Ground Water Board: District Groundwater Brochure Dharmapuri
District, Tamil Nadu, Technical Report Series, Ministry of Water Resources,
Government of India, available at:
<uri>http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Dharmapuri.pdf</uri>
(last access: 5 February 2015), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
D'Odorico, P., Bhattachan, A., Davis, K. F., Ravi, S., and  Runyan, C. W.: Global
desertification: Drivers and feedbacks, Adv. Water Resour., 51,
326–344, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Fleskens, L. and Stringer, L. C.: Land management and policy responses to
mitigate desertification and land degradation, Land Degrad.
Dev., 25, 1–4,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Guo, M., Liu, Y., Wang, X. F., Matsuoka, N., and Tani, H.: Analysis of
Desertification and Wood Land Distribution: A Case Study on the Balinyou
Banner of Inner Mongolia, China, International Society for Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing Proceedings, available at:
<uri>http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/ISRSE-34/211104015Final00042.pdf</uri> (last
access: 13 June 2015),  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hanan, N. P., Prince, S. D., and Hiernaux, P. H. Y.: Spectral modeling of multi
component landscapes in the Sahel, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
12, 1243–1258, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Hill, J.: LADAMER: Land and Soil Degradation Assessments in Mediterranean
Europe, available at:
<uri>https://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb6/prof/FER/Bilder-Forschung/Ladamer/GMES-Paper_Nordwijk.pdf</uri> (last access: 3 September 2015), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Izzo, M., Araujo, N., Aucelli, P. P. C., Maratea, A., and Sánchez, A.: LAND
sensitivity to desertification in the dominican republic: AN adaptation of
the ESA methodology, Land Degrad. Dev., 24, 486–498,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kassas, M.: Arid and Semi-arid Lands: Problems and Prospects,
Agro-Ecosystem, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amstredam – Printed
in the Netherlands, available at:
<uri>http://kassas.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/026.pdf</uri> (last access: 7 April
2015), 3, 185–204, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Kundu, A. and Dutta, D.: Monitoring desertification risk through climate
change and human interference using Remote sensing and GIS techniques,
Int. J. Geomat. Geosci., 2, 21–33, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, N.-F. and Tang, J.: Geological environment and causes for
desertification in arid-semi-arid regions in China, Environ. Geol.,
41, 806–815, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Low, P. S. (Ed.).: Economic and social impacts of desertification, land
degradation and drought, White Paper I. UNCCD 2nd Scientific Conference,
prepared with the contributions of an international group of scientists,
available at:
<uri>http://2sc.unccd.int/fileadmin/unccd/upload/documents/WhitePapers/White_Paper_1.pdf</uri> (last access: 9 February 2016), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Metternicht, G. and Zinck, J. A. (Eds.): Remote Sensing of Soil
Salinization: Impact on Land Management, Taylor and Francis Group, LCC, CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, ISBN 978-1-4200-6502-2, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Meyer, P., Itten, K. I., Kellenberger, T., Sandmeier, S., and Sandmeier, R.:
Radiometric Corrections of Topographically Induced Effects on Landsat TM Data
in an Alpine Environment, J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 48, 17–28, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Miao, L., Moore, J. C., Zeng, F., Lei, J., Ding, J., He, B., and Cui, X.:
Footprint of Research in Desertification Management in China, Land Degrad.
Dev., 26, 450–457, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. S., Clarke, T. R., Inoue, Y., and Vidal, A.: Estimating crop water
deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral
vegetation index, Remote Sens. Environ., 49, 246–263, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Naseri, M. Y.: Characterization of salt-affected soils for modeling
sustainable land management in semi-arid environment; a case study in the
Gorgan region, Northeast Iran, PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium,
281–287, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, S. E., Davenport, M. L., and Malo, A. R.: A comparison of the
vegetation response to rainfall in the Sahel and East Africa using
normalized difference vegetation index from NOAA AVHRR, Clim. Change, 17,
209–241, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ramesh, K. and Soorya, V.: Fluoride Contamination in Drinking Water in
Palacode Region, Tamil Nadu, Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ., 2, 116–123, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, K., Fog, B., and Madsen, J. E.: Desertification in reverse?
Observations from northern Burkina Faso, Glob. Environ. Change, 11,
271–282, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Roxo, M. J., Casimiro, P., and Tiago, M. S.: What is Desertification, Desert
Links project, Framework- European Union, Geografia e Planeamento Regional
– Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas – Universidade Nova de
Lisboa, available at:
<uri>https://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/downloads/deliverables/Deliverable%201.2b_en.pdf</uri> (last access: 2 February 2015), 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Runnstrom, M. C.: Rangeland development of the Mu Us sandy land in semi-arid
china: an analysis using landsat and NOAA remote sensing data, Land Degrad. Dev., 14, 189–202, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Salvati, L., Zitti, M., and Perini, L.: Fifty years on: Long-term patterns
of land sensitivity to desertification in Italy, Land Degrad.
Dev., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2226" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ldr.2226</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Sandholt, I., Rasmussen, K., and Andersen, J.: A simple interpretation of
the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of soil
moisture status, Remote Sens. Environ., 79, 213–224, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sendesh, K. K., Ramasubramanian, V., and Sathyaraj, S. R.: Identification of
Fluoride contaminations with the interaction of physio-chemical
characteristic in Groundwater of Dharmapuri District, TamilNadu, INDIA,
Archives Appl. Sci. Res., 3, 336–351, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shafian, S. and Maas, S. J.: Index of Soil Moisture Using Raw Landsat Image
Digital Count Data in Texas High Plains, Remote Sens., 7, 2352–2372, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sharmia, S.: DESERTIFICATION – about drought, desertification and poverty
in the drylands, Google Blog, available at:
<uri>https://desertification.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/
excessive-irrigation-promotes-desertification-google-the-new-nation/</uri> (last
access: 3 June 2015), 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Shewale, M. P. and Shravan, K.: Climatological features of Drought
incidences in India, Meteorological Department Report, National climate
centre, Office of the additional director general of meteorology (Research),
India Meteorological Department, Pune, available at:
<uri>http://www.imdpune.gov.in/research/ drought/DROUGHT_CLIMATOLOGY_1.pdf</uri> (last access: 13 June 2015), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, L., Abraham, E. M., Rubio, C., Barbero-Sierra, C., and
Ruiz-Pérez, M.: Desertification Research in Argentina, Land Degrad.
Dev., 26, 433–440, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>UNCCD: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Geneva,
Switzerland, United Nations, available at:
<uri>https://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/downloads/deliverables/Deliverable%201.2b_en.pdf</uri> (last access: 3 March 2015), 58 pp., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>UNCCD: Zero Net Land Degradation – A Sustainable Development Goal for Rio
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20, UNCCD Secretariat Recommendations for Policymakers, available at:
<uri>http://www.unccd.int/Lists/SiteDocumentLibrary/Rio+20/UNCCD_PolicyBrief_ZeroNetLandDegradation.pdf</uri> (last access: 3 March
2015), ISBN 978-92-95043-62-6, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Soil Survey Staff: US Deptartment of Agriculture:  Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th
Edn., USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 372 pp.,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Vieira, R. M. S. P., Tomasella, J., Alvalá, R. C. S., Sestini, M. F.,
Affonso, A. G., Rodriguez, D. A., Barbosa, A. A., Cunha, A. P. M. A., Valles,
G. F., Crepani, E., de Oliveira, S. B. P., de Souza, M. S. B., Calil, P. M.,
de Carvalho, M. A., Valeriano, D. M., Campello, F. C. B., and Santana, M. O.:
Identifying areas susceptible to desertification in the Brazilian northeast,
Solid Earth, 6, 347–360, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/se-6-347-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-6-347-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Xue, X., Zhou, L., and Guo, J.: Combating Aeolian Desertification
in Northern China, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 118–132, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Chen, F., and Dong, Z.: The relative role of climatic and human
factors in desertification in semi-arid China, Glob. Environ. Change, 16,
48–57, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X. M., Zhang, C. X., Hasi, E., and Dong, Z. B.: Has the Three Norths
Forest Shelterbelt Program solved the desertification and dust storm problems
in arid and semiarid China, J. Arid Environ., 74, 13–22, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Wessels, K. J., Prince, A. S., Carroll, M., and Malherbe, J.: Relevance of
rangeland degradation in semi-arid north eastern South Africa to the
non-equilibrium theory, Ecol. Appl., 17, 815–827, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, D. L., Goward, S., and Arvidson, T.: Landsat: yesterday, today, and
tomorrow, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 72, 1171–1178, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, E.-Q., Zhang, H.-Q., and Li, M.-X.: Object-Based Mapping of Karst Rocky
Desertification using a Support Vector Machine, Land Degrad. Dev., 26,
158–167, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, X. and Cai, Y. L.: Multi-Scale Anthropogenic Driving Forces of Karst
Rocky Desertification in Southwest China, Land Degrad. Dev., 26,
193–200, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling the contributing factors of desertification and evaluating their
relationships to the soil degradation process through geomatic techniques</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Desertification is a prolonged type of land degradation which converts the
productive ecosystem to a fragile one by two crucial factors, namely, climate and
negative human intrusion. The present study concentrates on identifying the
causative factors of desertification, namely temperature, wind, rainfall
scarcity and human pressure. It also concentrates on distinguishing the desertified land from
degraded land and assessing the way in which the soil degradation process
becomes accelerated by these factors, by employing data sets such as
meteorological data and Landsat ETM+  (Enhanced Thematic Mapper) and OLI (Operational Land Imager) satellite images of the
crop-growing period (June–October) in geostatistical methods and newly proposed
remote sensing models, which yielded good accuracy with in situ observations
(<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.8). The study was centered on two time periods, 2001–2011 (11
years) and 2012–2015 (4 years). In rainfall–temperature/drought-induced
desertified region, the rate of salt-affected soils increased significantly
from 12 to 58 % (2001–2015) due to the presence of native fluoride
concentration and extreme temperature events. The region has also been
experiencing high soil moisture stress (5 to 33 %) because of the
insufficient occurrence of rainfall over a period of time. A longer term
exacerbation of soil moisture stress (19 to 90 %) has been noted in
the areas that were susceptible to wind-induced desertification, due to a high
evaporation rate caused by extreme wind events for a substantial period. High
human-induced soil salinity (36 %), human occupancy (16 %), followed
by moisture stress (7 %) are observed in the human-affected region
because of growing population and improper land management of the land that is already
fragile.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdul-Qadir, A. M. H. and Benni, T. J.: Monitoring and evaluation of soil
salinity in term of spectral response using Landsat images and GIS in
Mesopotamian plain/Iraq, Journal of Iraqi Desert Studies, 2, 19–32, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adhikary, P. P., Dash, C. J., Sarangi, A., and Singh, D. K.: Hydrochemical
characterization and spatial distribution of fluoride in groundwater of
Delhi state, India, Indian J. Soil Conserv., 42, 170–173, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Akhtar-Schuster, M., Thomas, R. J., Stringer, L. C., Chasek, P., and Seely,
M.: Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation:
Institutional, financial, legal and science-policy challenges and solutions,
Land Degrad. Dev., 22, 299–312,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Allbed, A., Kumar, L., and Sinha, P.: Mapping and Modelling Spatial
Variation in Soil Salinity in the Al Hassa Oasis Based on Remote Sensing
Indicators and Regression Techniques, Remote Sens., 6, 1137–1157, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Anbazhagan, S., Palpandian, P., Jothibasu, A., Uma Maheswaran, S.,
Venkatesan, A., and Ramesh, V.: GIS spatial analysis for artificial recharge
– a case study from drought prone area, in: Water Management – Historical
Perspective and Development, edited by: Anbazhagan, S., Vasagan Publication,
ISBN: 978-93-83188-01-7, 107–133, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barbero-Sierra, C., Marques, M. J., Ruiz-Pérez, M., Escadafal, R., and
Exbrayat, W.: How is Desertification Research Addressed in Spain? Land Versus
Soil Approaches, Land Degrad. Dev., 26,
423–432, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bisaro, A., Kirk, M., Zdruli, P., and Zimmermann, W.: Global Drivers setting
Desertification research priorities: Insights from a stakeholder
consultation forum, Land Degrad. Dev., 25, 5–16, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Census of India: Provisional population Totals – Rural and Urban
Distribution, Paper 2, volume 1, series 34, office of the Registrar General
&amp; Census Commissioner, India, Data Product No.00-004-2011-Cen-Book(E),
available at:
<a href="http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/prov_results_paper2_india.html" target="_blank">http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/prov_results_paper2_india.html</a> (last access: 1
November 2015), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Central Ground Water Board: District Groundwater Brochure Dharmapuri
District, Tamil Nadu, Technical Report Series, Ministry of Water Resources,
Government of India, available at:
<a href="http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Dharmapuri.pdf" target="_blank">http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/TamilNadu/Dharmapuri.pdf</a>
(last access: 5 February 2015), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
D'Odorico, P., Bhattachan, A., Davis, K. F., Ravi, S., and  Runyan, C. W.: Global
desertification: Drivers and feedbacks, Adv. Water Resour., 51,
326–344, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Fleskens, L. and Stringer, L. C.: Land management and policy responses to
mitigate desertification and land degradation, Land Degrad.
Dev., 25, 1–4,  2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, M., Liu, Y., Wang, X. F., Matsuoka, N., and Tani, H.: Analysis of
Desertification and Wood Land Distribution: A Case Study on the Balinyou
Banner of Inner Mongolia, China, International Society for Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing Proceedings, available at:
<a href="http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/ISRSE-34/211104015Final00042.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/ISRSE-34/211104015Final00042.pdf</a> (last
access: 13 June 2015),  2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hanan, N. P., Prince, S. D., and Hiernaux, P. H. Y.: Spectral modeling of multi
component landscapes in the Sahel, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
12, 1243–1258, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, J.: LADAMER: Land and Soil Degradation Assessments in Mediterranean
Europe, available at:
<a href="https://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb6/prof/FER/Bilder-Forschung/Ladamer/GMES-Paper_Nordwijk.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb6/prof/FER/Bilder-Forschung/Ladamer/GMES-Paper_Nordwijk.pdf</a> (last access: 3 September 2015), 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Izzo, M., Araujo, N., Aucelli, P. P. C., Maratea, A., and Sánchez, A.: LAND
sensitivity to desertification in the dominican republic: AN adaptation of
the ESA methodology, Land Degrad. Dev., 24, 486–498,  2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Kassas, M.: Arid and Semi-arid Lands: Problems and Prospects,
Agro-Ecosystem, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amstredam – Printed
in the Netherlands, available at:
<a href="http://kassas.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/026.pdf" target="_blank">http://kassas.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/026.pdf</a> (last access: 7 April
2015), 3, 185–204, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Kundu, A. and Dutta, D.: Monitoring desertification risk through climate
change and human interference using Remote sensing and GIS techniques,
Int. J. Geomat. Geosci., 2, 21–33, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, N.-F. and Tang, J.: Geological environment and causes for
desertification in arid-semi-arid regions in China, Environ. Geol.,
41, 806–815, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Low, P. S. (Ed.).: Economic and social impacts of desertification, land
degradation and drought, White Paper I. UNCCD 2nd Scientific Conference,
prepared with the contributions of an international group of scientists,
available at:
<a href="http://2sc.unccd.int/fileadmin/unccd/upload/documents/WhitePapers/White_Paper_1.pdf" target="_blank">http://2sc.unccd.int/fileadmin/unccd/upload/documents/WhitePapers/White_Paper_1.pdf</a> (last access: 9 February 2016), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Metternicht, G. and Zinck, J. A. (Eds.): Remote Sensing of Soil
Salinization: Impact on Land Management, Taylor and Francis Group, LCC, CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, ISBN 978-1-4200-6502-2, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Meyer, P., Itten, K. I., Kellenberger, T., Sandmeier, S., and Sandmeier, R.:
Radiometric Corrections of Topographically Induced Effects on Landsat TM Data
in an Alpine Environment, J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 48, 17–28, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Miao, L., Moore, J. C., Zeng, F., Lei, J., Ding, J., He, B., and Cui, X.:
Footprint of Research in Desertification Management in China, Land Degrad.
Dev., 26, 450–457, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. S., Clarke, T. R., Inoue, Y., and Vidal, A.: Estimating crop water
deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral
vegetation index, Remote Sens. Environ., 49, 246–263, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Naseri, M. Y.: Characterization of salt-affected soils for modeling
sustainable land management in semi-arid environment; a case study in the
Gorgan region, Northeast Iran, PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium,
281–287, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, S. E., Davenport, M. L., and Malo, A. R.: A comparison of the
vegetation response to rainfall in the Sahel and East Africa using
normalized difference vegetation index from NOAA AVHRR, Clim. Change, 17,
209–241, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ramesh, K. and Soorya, V.: Fluoride Contamination in Drinking Water in
Palacode Region, Tamil Nadu, Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ., 2, 116–123, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, K., Fog, B., and Madsen, J. E.: Desertification in reverse?
Observations from northern Burkina Faso, Glob. Environ. Change, 11,
271–282, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Roxo, M. J., Casimiro, P., and Tiago, M. S.: What is Desertification, Desert
Links project, Framework- European Union, Geografia e Planeamento Regional
– Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas – Universidade Nova de
Lisboa, available at:
<a href="https://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/downloads/deliverables/Deliverable%201.2b_en.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/downloads/deliverables/Deliverable%201.2b_en.pdf</a> (last access: 2 February 2015), 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Runnstrom, M. C.: Rangeland development of the Mu Us sandy land in semi-arid
china: an analysis using landsat and NOAA remote sensing data, Land Degrad. Dev., 14, 189–202, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Salvati, L., Zitti, M., and Perini, L.: Fifty years on: Long-term patterns
of land sensitivity to desertification in Italy, Land Degrad.
Dev., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2226" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/ldr.2226</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Sandholt, I., Rasmussen, K., and Andersen, J.: A simple interpretation of
the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of soil
moisture status, Remote Sens. Environ., 79, 213–224, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Sendesh, K. K., Ramasubramanian, V., and Sathyaraj, S. R.: Identification of
Fluoride contaminations with the interaction of physio-chemical
characteristic in Groundwater of Dharmapuri District, TamilNadu, INDIA,
Archives Appl. Sci. Res., 3, 336–351, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shafian, S. and Maas, S. J.: Index of Soil Moisture Using Raw Landsat Image
Digital Count Data in Texas High Plains, Remote Sens., 7, 2352–2372, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sharmia, S.: DESERTIFICATION – about drought, desertification and poverty
in the drylands, Google Blog, available at:
<a href="https://desertification.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/&#xA;excessive-irrigation-promotes-desertification-google-the-new-nation/" target="_blank">https://desertification.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/
excessive-irrigation-promotes-desertification-google-the-new-nation/</a> (last
access: 3 June 2015), 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Shewale, M. P. and Shravan, K.: Climatological features of Drought
incidences in India, Meteorological Department Report, National climate
centre, Office of the additional director general of meteorology (Research),
India Meteorological Department, Pune, available at:
<a href="http://www.imdpune.gov.in/research/ drought/DROUGHT_CLIMATOLOGY_1.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.imdpune.gov.in/research/ drought/DROUGHT_CLIMATOLOGY_1.pdf</a> (last access: 13 June 2015), 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, L., Abraham, E. M., Rubio, C., Barbero-Sierra, C., and
Ruiz-Pérez, M.: Desertification Research in Argentina, Land Degrad.
Dev., 26, 433–440, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
UNCCD: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Geneva,
Switzerland, United Nations, available at:
<a href="https://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/downloads/deliverables/Deliverable%201.2b_en.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.kcl.ac.uk/projects/desertlinks/downloads/deliverables/Deliverable%201.2b_en.pdf</a> (last access: 3 March 2015), 58 pp., 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
UNCCD: Zero Net Land Degradation – A Sustainable Development Goal for Rio
+20, UNCCD Secretariat Recommendations for Policymakers, available at:
<a href="http://www.unccd.int/Lists/SiteDocumentLibrary/Rio+20/UNCCD_PolicyBrief_ZeroNetLandDegradation.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.unccd.int/Lists/SiteDocumentLibrary/Rio+20/UNCCD_PolicyBrief_ZeroNetLandDegradation.pdf</a> (last access: 3 March
2015), ISBN 978-92-95043-62-6, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Soil Survey Staff: US Deptartment of Agriculture:  Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th
Edn., USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 372 pp.,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Vieira, R. M. S. P., Tomasella, J., Alvalá, R. C. S., Sestini, M. F.,
Affonso, A. G., Rodriguez, D. A., Barbosa, A. A., Cunha, A. P. M. A., Valles,
G. F., Crepani, E., de Oliveira, S. B. P., de Souza, M. S. B., Calil, P. M.,
de Carvalho, M. A., Valeriano, D. M., Campello, F. C. B., and Santana, M. O.:
Identifying areas susceptible to desertification in the Brazilian northeast,
Solid Earth, 6, 347–360, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/se-6-347-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/se-6-347-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, T., Xue, X., Zhou, L., and Guo, J.: Combating Aeolian Desertification
in Northern China, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 118–132, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Chen, F., and Dong, Z.: The relative role of climatic and human
factors in desertification in semi-arid China, Glob. Environ. Change, 16,
48–57, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X. M., Zhang, C. X., Hasi, E., and Dong, Z. B.: Has the Three Norths
Forest Shelterbelt Program solved the desertification and dust storm problems
in arid and semiarid China, J. Arid Environ., 74, 13–22, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Wessels, K. J., Prince, A. S., Carroll, M., and Malherbe, J.: Relevance of
rangeland degradation in semi-arid north eastern South Africa to the
non-equilibrium theory, Ecol. Appl., 17, 815–827, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, D. L., Goward, S., and Arvidson, T.: Landsat: yesterday, today, and
tomorrow, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 72, 1171–1178, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, E.-Q., Zhang, H.-Q., and Li, M.-X.: Object-Based Mapping of Karst Rocky
Desertification using a Support Vector Machine, Land Degrad. Dev., 26,
158–167, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Yan, X. and Cai, Y. L.: Multi-Scale Anthropogenic Driving Forces of Karst
Rocky Desertification in Southwest China, Land Degrad. Dev., 26,
193–200, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
