<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-7-441-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Calculating structural and geometrical parameters by laboratory
measurements and X-ray microtomography: a comparative <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>study applied
to a limestone sample before and after a <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>dissolution experiment</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Comparative study of petrophysical parameters}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Luquot et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Luquot</surname><given-names>Linda</given-names></name>
          <email>linda.luquot@idaea.csic.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-3019</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hebert</surname><given-names>Vanessa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rodriguez</surname><given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA),
Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), c/ Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Voxaya SAS, Cap Omega, Rond-Point Benjamin Franklin, CS 39521,
34960 Montpellier, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Linda Luquot (linda.luquot@idaea.csic.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>441</fpage><lpage>456</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The aim of this study is to compare the structural, geometrical and
transport parameters of a limestone rock sample determined by X-ray
microtomography (XMT) images and laboratory experiments.  Total and
effective porosity, pore-size distribution, tortuosity, and effective
diffusion coefficient have been estimated.  Sensitivity analyses of
the segmentation parameters
have been performed.  The limestone rock sample studied here has
been characterized using both approaches before and after a reactive
percolation experiment.  Strong dissolution process occurred during
the percolation, promoting a wormhole formation.  This strong
heterogeneity formed after the percolation step allows us to apply our
methodology to two different samples and enhance the use of
experimental techniques or XMT images depending on the rock
heterogeneity.  We established that for most of the parameters
calculated here, the values obtained by computing XMT images are in
agreement with the classical laboratory measurements.  We
demonstrated that the computational porosity is more informative
than the laboratory measurement.  We observed that pore-size distributions
obtained by XMT images and laboratory experiments are slightly
different but complementary.  Regarding the effective diffusion
coefficient, we concluded that both approaches are valuable and give
similar results.  Nevertheless, we concluded that computing XMT
images to determine transport, geometrical, and petrophysical
parameters provide similar results to those measured at the
laboratory but with much shorter durations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Characterizing the rock pore structure such as the porosity, the total
pore–rock interface and the connectivity is essential to evaluate oil or gas
production or volume of stored <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in case of geological
sequestration, for example. Porosity is a key petrophysical parameter,
indicating the total volume of oil, gas, or water that can be contained in
a reservoir. It is essential to differentiate the total porosity from the
open connected or effective porosity, which is the fraction of porosity
accessible by any fluid. Connectivity as well as permeability and tortuosity
allow us to quantify the ability to extract or inject fluids. The higher the
connectivity and permeability are and the lower the tortuosity is, the higher
the extraction or injection flow rate will be. In consolidated rock aquifers,
the groundwater flow occurs through discrete openings, i.e. fractures, and
only to a small extent in the pore-network of the rock matrix. The migration
of solutes and solvents in fractured rock aquifers is therefore determined by
the relative contribution of advective flow compared to matrix diffusion
transverse to the flow direction, resulting in the retardation of the solute. The
advection transport is controlled by the permeability of the reservoir
(mainly controlled by fracture or preferential flow path as wormhole or karst
conduit), whereas the diffusion through the matrix depends of the effective
diffusion coefficient, which is linked to tortuosity, effective porosity and
cementation factor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.1"/>. Diffusion in rock, of either
gas or liquid phase, could be the rate-limiting or dominant process in many
scenarios, such as geologic disposal of radioactive waste
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.2"/>, contaminant remediation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geological storage
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.4"/>, and oil and gas recovery
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.5"/>. Diffusion of hazardous gas or liquid
chemicals in construction materials has also become a concern for public
health and security <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.6"/>. Therefore, knowledge of diffusion processes and
rates in rocks is important to better
understand these issues.</p>
      <p>To evaluate all these parameters, different laboratory petrophysical
techniques are usually used. Some of them are time consuming and
destructive methods, such as mercury pore-size measurement or BET
(Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) surface analysis. Moreover, these different
techniques are performed at different sample scales and may require
prior preparation, such as thin section for SEM (Scanning Electron
Microscope) analysis, for example. Yet, most of the laboratories
techniques used and discussed in this article are fully validated.</p>
      <p>Currently, a lot of petrophysical, geometrical, transport and mechanical
parameters are computed using 3-D X-ray microtomography (XMT) images
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.7"/>. High resolution 3-D XMT is a powerful technique
used to image and characterize the internal structure and geometry of natural
and/or artificial objects. It is a non-destructive method that does not need
prior sample treatment, such as impregnation, thinning or polishing
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.8"/>. In this technique, contiguous sequential
images are compiled to create 3-D representations that may be digitally
processed to obtain relevant quantitative geometric and/or morphological
parameters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.9"/>. 3-D data provides access to some
very important geometric and topological characteristics such as size, shape,
orientation distribution of individual features and that of their local
neighbourhoods, connectivity between features and network, composition, etc.
Computational techniques have progressed to the point where material
properties such as conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.10"/>, diffusivity
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="altparen.11"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="altparen.12"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="altparen.13"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.14"/>), permeability
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="altparen.15"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.16"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.17"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.18"/>), pore-size distribution
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.19"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="altparen.20"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.21"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="altparen.22"/>) and linear elasticity
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="altparen.23"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.24"/>;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="altparen.25"/>) can be calculated on large three-dimensional
digitized grids (over 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> voxels). More details on this technique,
acquisition and data computing step can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx18" id="text.26"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.27"/>. In geosciences, the internal structure
of a great diversity of geological samples has been examined by radiographic
imaging mainly in the last 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.28"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>; <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="altparen.29"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>;
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.30"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>; <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="altparen.31"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>;
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="altparen.32"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>; <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="altparen.33"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>;
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="altparen.34"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>; <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.35"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>;
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="altparen.36"/><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>).</p>
      <p>Yet, to our knowledge, no study has been conducted to explore the
potential links that can be made between variables computed from XMT
images and those traditionally measured in the laboratory for
a limestone core rock sample, before and after a dissolution
process. Only one similar study was done by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.37"/> on soil material using a medical scanner with
a large pixel size (0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Nevertheless, op. cited authors
focused their study to only a few parameters.</p>
      <p>Here, we use high resolution X-ray microtomography images to
characterize the structural and geometrical parameters of a limestone
core rock sample percolated by an acidic solution. We computed and
experimentally measured,  total and effective porosity, pore-size diameter
distribution, effective diffusion coefficient, and tortuosity. These
parameters are those needed for numerical modelling to evaluate oil and
gas deposit volume and extraction flow rate, for example. Quantifying
the pore network characteristics of a same sample before and after a dissolution
experiment allows to apply our methodology to two different pore networks
and enhance the use of experimental techniques or XMT images depending
on the rock heterogeneity. The focus of the present study is to
articulate the potential of variables estimated using XMT images and
how these estimates compare with, and complement, traditional
laboratory-based measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p>In this section, we describe the different laboratory measurements and XMT
images computations to evaluate the various petrophysical, geometrical
and hydrodynamic parameters. The list of these parameters and the corresponding methods are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of the measured parameters and the corresponding methodologies. (seg.: segmentation, Psd: pore-size distribution, Msd:
mean square diplacement, TPP: total porous phase, RPP: resolved porous phase, CRPP: connected resolved porous phase).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center" colsep="1">Analyzed properties </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">Methods of analysis </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lab measurement</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">XMT computing </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">XMT tools</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Analyzed phases</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total volume fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Voxaya seg. algorithm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">calculation errors</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Voxaya seg. algorithm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">effective porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">triple weighing method</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">clustering algorithm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Geometric parameters</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">interface surface area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BET</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Voxaya algorithm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CRPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pore size</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">retention curves</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Psd function and Euclidean distance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">chord-length algorithm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Voxaya skeleton algorithm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CRPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hydrodynamic parameters</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">diffusion coefficient/tortuosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">through-diffusion experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Msd of virtual particles (Brownian motion)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CRPP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">permeability</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">pressure drop</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Laboratory methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Rock sample</title>
      <p>The rock sample used in this study is an oolitic limestone almost
composed of calcite (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and is named Bvl in the paper.
This limestone is commonly referred to as Beauval rock and is coming from Beaunotte in Dordogne
region in France. It is characterized by a beige colour with some
shells.  The mean connected porosity is usually comprised between 9
and 13 %, according to general information provided by quarry mining companies.
The core sample diameter and length are respectively 2.5
and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Laboratory petrophysical characterization</title>
      <p>In order to characterize the different geometrical and structural
properties of the rock sample before and after the percolation
experiments, we used different classical laboratory experiments. These
different techniques have been performed following a home-methodology
to avoid too many drying and wetting sample steps.</p>
      <p>First of all, to evaluate the effective (connected) porosity, we used
the triple weighing method. We first measured the dry sample weight
after leaving the sample during 48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in an oven at
40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. We then saturated the sample, starting by a sample
vacuum step.  Afterwards, we left the calcite equilibrated water
penetrate into the pore structure and we weighed the saturated and
submerged sample weights. We weighed four times the sample during the
dry, saturated and submerged steps. This classical method is very time consuming
and requires 4 entire days.</p>
      <p>Then, we took advantage of the saturated sample state to evaluate the
pore-size distribution by measuring the retention curve of the sample using
a centrifuge and applying various rotation rates as previously done by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.38"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.39"/>. The technique consists
in applying a high gravity field to an initially saturated sample and
measuring the drained volume of water. For this purpose, we used
a Rotina<sup>®</sup> 420R centrifuge following the
methodology of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.40"/> using six speed increments up to
4500 rpm. The maximum suction that can be applied to the sample at 4500 rpm
is 213 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This technique allows us to measure the effective
capillary size distribution and the retention curve <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volumetric water content and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the capillary pressure
(minus suction). By capillarity theory (Young-Laplace equation with
cylindrical approximation), the minimum radius of a pore that drains at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is given by:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface tension (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>72.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mN</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="altparen.41"/>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the contact angle (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.42"/>). Using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>),
we can convert the measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into an equivalent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve. This curve is actually a cumulative pore-size
distribution; the water content <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the
combined volume of all pores with opening radius less than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The measurements were performed twice in the two directions to evaluate the
sample anisotropy. Six days were necessary to acquire the retention curves in
both directions two times, dry, and re-saturate the sample for the second
measurement.</p>
      <p>After the centrifuge step, we dried the sample again in an oven during
48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and measured again the dry sample
weight. We then repeated the triple weighing method to evaluate the
initial porosity and took advantage of the saturation state of the
sample to perform through-diffusion experiment. Classically, the
effective diffusion coefficient as well as the tortuosity factor is
measured by liquid phase conservative tracer test (usually iodine) as
presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.43"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.44"/>.</p>
      <p>Through-diffusion experiments were performed to determine the
effective diffusion coefficient and tortuosity/constrictivity ratio
before and after the dissolution experiment
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.45"/>. The same methodology as the one developed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.46"/> has been used here. The diffusion cell
apparatus consisted of two acryl-glass cells of equal size and
volume. The reservoir cell contained a 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
potassium iodide tracer solution, whereas the sink cell did not contain
any tracer at the beginning. We used Beauval rock equilibrated water
in both reservoirs and we added several milligrams of sodium azide
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaN</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to prevent biofilm formation. The mounted rock sample was
sandwiched between the sink and reservoir cell.  During the
experiment, iodide ions diffuse from the reservoir cell into the sink
cell through sample Bvl. An iodide-specific electrode from
Cole–Parmer Instrument CO was used to measure the iodide
concentration in the sink cell. More details about the procedure can
be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.47"/>.  The aqueous diffusion
coefficient for iodide (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.48"/> was used
to calculate the effective diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
effective diffusion coefficient was calculated using the equation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.49"/>:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the slope of solute mass vs. time, which is
obtained from linear regression of data in the steady-state range, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the rock sample thickness and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration in the
reservoir cell.  Then, it is possible to determine the tortuosity
coefficient using the definition of the effective diffusion
coefficient in a porous water-saturated media proposed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.50"/>:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is tortuosity and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is constrictivity. These
coefficients are sometimes gathered together into an empirical
exponent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, denoted cementation factor, as in the following
equation:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>aq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Through-diffusion experiment are time consuming because of the slow
diffusion rate of a liquid tracer, even for porous limestone and
sandstone samples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.51"/>. One to two weeks are
needed for each measurement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Laboratory percolation experiment</title>
      <p>We performed the flow-through experiment using the apparatus presented
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.52"/>. The setup allows to inject at constant
flow rate up to four different solutions in parallel through four
distinct core samples. Various pressure sensors and a differential
pressure sensor enable to monitor the inlet and outlet pressures and
then calculate the sample permeability using Darcy's law.  We injected
an acidic solution through sample Bvl at constant flow rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at room temperature and
pressure. The injected solution was an acetic acid at pH <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
buffered at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We prepared the injected solution by mixing
28.43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of acetic acid with 2.184  of
sodium acetate. During the dissolution experiment, we continuously
recorded the inlet and outlet pH and the pressure drop between the
inlet and outlet of the sample to calculate the sample
permeability. The total injected fluid was 146 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or some
90 pore volumes of sample Bvl (initial pore volume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Outlet water was sampled periodically, acidified to prevent mineral
precipitation, and analyzed for concentrations of Ca using inductively
coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrophotometry (ICP-AES, IDAEA,
Spain). Reaction progress and porosity changes are calculated from the
difference between injected and percolated waters, knowing that
calcite is the only mineral composing the sample. Calcite dissolution is described as follows:
              <disp-formula id="R1" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⇌</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The volume of
dissolved calcite (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>calcite</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is calculated as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>calcite</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calcite molar volume (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
difference between the outlet and inlet calcium
concentration. Therefore, we can calculate the sample-scale porosity
change during the percolation experiment using the following equation:</p>
      <p><disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>calcite</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total sample volume and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the initial
sample porosity. The error <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
change of calcium concentration was estimated using the Gaussian error
propagation method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.53"/>. The calculated error is
propagated to the porosity estimation.  After the percolation
experiment, we characterized the core rock sample using the same
methodology as before, described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>X-ray microtomography images</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Images acquisition</title>
      <p>X-ray microtomography images were acquired on the ID19 beamline at ESRF
(European Synchrotron Radiation Facility), Grenoble (France). The acquisition
was done in white beam configuration, using a ROI of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2048</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>1690</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixels. The sample was placed at 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and different filters
were used in this configuration (2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of Al and 0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
W) to achieve an energy of 71.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">keV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a gap of 57. The voxel size
was 7.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We acquired 4998 radiographies in 360<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
41 references and 20 dark images to reduce the noise during the 3-D
reconstruction. The acquisition time for each radiography was 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
which induces a total acquisition time for the entire sample (two scan steps)
of about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (taking the motor movements into account). Two 3-D
images were acquired: one for the sample before percolation experiment and
one after, respectively named <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Image processing and parameter extraction</title>
      <p>Analysis of the XMT images allows us to quantify the volume and morphology of the pore structure identified
during the segmentation process.  Using the 3-D pore
representation, one can estimate its total and connected porosity
and geometrical properties, such as its surface area and pore-size
distribution.  The processed images and results were mostly computed
with Voxaya's software. The same methodological framework was
applied to both images.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Filtering and region of interest extraction</title>
      <p>The very first step in the image processing workflow consists in
isolating the region of interest: a cylindrical mask is applied on the
image in order to extract its relevant part. A median filter is then
used to remove noise while preserving edges of the structures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Segmentation and porosity calculation</title>
      <p>Segmentation is one of the most important step in image analysis. It
consists in gathering voxels that belongs to a same object and assigning
them a single common value (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> which illustrates the segmentation step).  Voxels identified to the matrix
constitute the solid phase which have the highest intensity and appear
in the brightest grey levels. Pores measured to be larger than the voxel
size (here 7.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are entirely captured by the camera
and appear in darkest grey levels in the image, forming a phase referred to as void phase
or resolved porous phase. We name sub-resolved porous space
the area appearing in intermediate grey levels and formed by matrix
(calcite in the present case) and pores measured to be smaller than the voxel
size. Note that this phase is sometimes denoted by the ambiguous term
“microporous phase” whereas resolved porous phase is often called
“macroporous phase”. Presence of pores smaller that the voxel size can
be confirmed for example by microscopic observations on thin sections
or a priori knowledge of the rock.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Histogram of grey scale values of Bvl sample images before the
dissolution experiment. The threshold value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is indicated in the graph. On
the top, a 2-D slice of Bvl before the dissolution experiment illustrates the
pore initial pore structure on the left and the binary image next to the
threshold step on the right.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In terms of numerical core analysis, computing porosity requires
to determine the relative fraction of the void phase volume and to
estimate the pore volume in the sub-resolved porous space. A first
segmentation algorithm based on a region growing method was used to
isolate the void phase. An additional image segmentation was then
conducted to isolate the sub-resolved porous space and compute its
volume fraction in the sample voxel.  We can define the sample
sub-resolved porosity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively denote the volume
fraction and the porosity of the sub-resolved porous space. The total
porosity is then given by the following:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample resolved porosity
(that is, the volume fraction of the void phase). Assuming that the
sample is chemically homogeneous, it is possible to estimate
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We first compute the mean greyscale values corresponding to
solid and void phases, respectively denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.54"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.55"/>, the grey level value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a voxel belonging to
the sub-resolved porous phase is linearly related to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Evaluating errors in porosity calculation</title>
      <p>Estimating the uncertainty occurring in the porosity calculation can
be achieved from an XMT image by performing, for example, several
image segmentation with different, but close, input parameters and
then calculating the associated porosities. For instance, if an image
is segmented using a basic thresholding technique, then one can perform
extra segmentations by varying threshold values by one or two units and
computing the associated porosities. This enables to assess
the robustness of the segmentation parameters determined by the user.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Connected components of the pore space</title>
      <p>A clustering algorithm derived from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.56"/>
enables to assess the connectivity of the pore space by identifying
neighbouring voxels that are connected to one another and assigning
a distinct label to each connected component. In this study, the
largest connected components of the pore space were extracted for both
resolved and sub-resolved porosity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Geometric parameters</title>
      <p>Many geometric parameters can be computed from the segmented image of
the pore space, namely the interface surface area, its global
curvature, and the Euler characteristics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.57"/>.
Here, we focused on the pore-size distribution and the surface-to-volume ratio
sometimes referred as “specific surface”.</p>
      <p>The imaged pore space is used to quantify pore network characteristics such
as pore size. The pore-size distribution is evaluated from XMT images using
a Voxaya module. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.58"/>, the pore-size
distribution function gives the probability that a random point in the pore
phase lies at a distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the nearest point on
the pore–solid interface. This is achieved by computing the Euclidean
distance from each voxel of the pore space to the interface, using a distance
transform algorithm based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.59"/>. Equivalently, one can
consider this distance to be the radius of the largest sphere centred at this
voxel and inscribed in the pore space. Yet, each sphere that is fully
included in a larger one have no significant contribution to the pore space
geometry and can thus be removed. In other words, this method returns the
count of inscribed spheres that are maximal in the sense of inclusion.</p>
      <p>Statistical measurements such as chord-length distribution functions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.60"/> were also calculated. The chord-length
distribution function is linked to a probability density of random
chords corresponding to a virtual mean pore diameter depending on each
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction. It thus provides information on the
sample anisotropy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx6" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Diffusion coefficient</title>
      <p>Diffusion experiments can be simulated on the void space image following the
methodology described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.61"/>. Consider a large number <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
(virtual) diffusing particles, initially uniformly distributed in the void
phase, and randomly moving following a Brownian motion, the diffusion
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> characterizes their ability to disperse in the void phase,
probing its structure. We denote by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the position of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th
particle at time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> their mean square displacement, that
is:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Then according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.62"/>:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the diffusion coefficient in an unbounded domain and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
the tortuosity, then when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to an
asymptotic value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx7" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Skeleton and properties</title>
      <p>The skeleton of a three-dimensional object is a one-dimensional
reduction, centred inside this object, preserving its geometrical and
topological features. It provides a simplified representation of
a shape: the skeleton of a cylinder, for instance, consists of its
axis of rotational symmetry. Formal definitions can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.63"/>.</p>
      <p>The skeleton is particularly known to be a tool of great interest to
investigate large objects with complex geometry, such as large
microtomography images of porous media. An implementation of the
classical thinning algorithm described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.64"/> was used
for this work.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>The temporal evolution of the increase in calcium concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, during the percolation experiment as well as the inlet and
outlet fluid pH are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. Dissolution reaction
occurred during the percolation experiment. Indeed, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is always positive (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicating Ca
release in the outlet fluid. Moreover, the outlet pH (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) is
higher than the inlet one which corroborates proton consumption and thus
calcite dissolution (Reaction <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="R1"/>). Dissolution reaction may induce
porosity increase and other geometrical, structural and hydrodynamical
parameter changes. Evaluating and characterizing these changes are essential
for developing predictive models of reactive-transport processes such as
those occurring during <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geological storage, fracking processes,
oil and gas exploitation, acid mine drainage, or seawater intrusion among
others.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Inlet (black) and outlet (red) pH variation during the
percolation experiment as well as variation in calcium
concentration(blue).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Laboratory petrophysical parameters</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Porosity evolution</title>
      <p>Initial porosity measurements on sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were performed by the triple weighing method (TW) and give
us an initial porosity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i(TW)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
(4 measurements), which is slightly higher than the one provided by
the quarries miner companies. This porosity is the connected porosity
which only takes into account the open pores connected to one of the
sample surface.  After the dissolution experiment, the same methodology
was applied four times and we measured a final porosity
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f(TW)</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>20.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p>
      <p>Mass balance calculation from the dissolution experiments were
performed using Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) and the final
porosity was evaluated using the initial porosity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f(chem)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
using the initial porosity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>i(TW)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. We obtained a final porosity
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f(chem)</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>19.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (propagating the error
of the TW method on the initial porosity value and the one from the
chemical analysis).  The slightly higher increase in porosity,
measured by the TW method, can be explained by the connection of initially non-
connected pores to the new connected porosity resulting from the dissolution
process whereas the porosity calculated by the mass
balance is affected by the dissolution only. The different porosity
measurements and calculations are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Determined porosities [%] (final one by mass balance calculation (chem),
before and after by triple weighing technique (TW), and before and after as well as
total (tot.), effective (open), resolved (res.) and sub-resolved (subres.) by XMT images
(XMT)), effective diffusion coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (from
through laboratory experiment (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and XMT images (XMT)), permeability <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]
and total fluid–rock interface (from BET measurement and XMT images (Minko)) for samples <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TW</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>(XMT)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>(chem)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff(XMT)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>(BET)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>(Minko)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6">% </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">res.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">subres.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">tot.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">open</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.3489</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.0018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.0021</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Pore-size distribution</title>
      <p>We obtained the pore-size distribution for sample Bvl before and after
the dissolution experiment from the retention curve (RET) as explained in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2"/>. We measured the retention curve by draining
the sample both in the flow and counterflow direction in order to evaluate
the pore-size anisotropy. If the pore-size distribution was heterogeneous, then we
should get different retention curves due to the gradient of
capillary pressure inside the sample. Specifically, large pores at the
inlet (but not at the outlet) will desaturate at small suctions
applied to the inlet (i.e., for small rpm when the inlet is placed
outside in the centrifuge).  Reversely, if the sample is rotated,
those pores will only desaturate when suction is large enough to drain
any of the outlet pores. The net result is that the measured curve
will exhibit directional dependence as previously observed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.65"/>.</p>
      <p>Initially, the pore-size distribution is homogeneous; the initial
retention curves are similar in both sample orientations
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). After the dissolution experiment, due to calcite
dissolution and porosity increase, the retention curves vary from the
initial one. Moreover, we can observe in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, that
after the dissolution experiment, some heterogeneity appeared along
the sample inducing different shapes for the retention curves acquired
in both directions. The corresponding pore-size distributions are
presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Retention curves before and after the dissolution experiment
for sample Bvl.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The results show that after dissolution, the amount of pores
of radii larger than 102.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases drastically. The
increase in largest pore size is similar whatever the sample direction
indicating that these pores are well connected together and broke
through the sample. We can also observe (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) that the
second major difference between the retention curves before and
after dissolution appears for pore radii <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>34.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (suction between 5.11 and
17.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). After the dissolution experiment, fewer pores of
such radii are present through the sample, indicating that most of
the dissolution occurred in these pores.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Pore volume content for different pore-size diameters before
and after the dissolution experiment.  The data have been extracted
from the Psd and C-l numerical measurements and RET laboratory
acquisition.  For the latter, the distributions after dissolution
were obtained both by draining in the flow direction and in the
opposite direction.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Iodine concentration measured in the sink cell during
diffusion experiment through sample Bvl before and after the
dissolution experiment.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The results also display some differences in the pore-size distribution after
the dissolution experiment depending on the sample orientation. These
differences highlight some heterogeneous dissolution inducing different pore
diameter changes along the sample. They are however minor when compared with
other experiments with strong dissolution localization
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.66"/>. Most discrepancy is visible for intermediate and
smallest pores (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moderately large
pores (radius around 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suction at 17.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are
better connected to the inlet than to the outlet (that is, they drain better
when the sample is placed opposite to the flow direction, i.e., dragging
toward the inlet, than otherwise). The proportion of the smallest pores is
consistently lower when the sample is placed opposite to the flow direction,
implying that dissolution also occurred in these pores at the inlet. However,
the water contents obtained with the sample placed in the flow direction for
high suctions (small pore sizes) were higher than before the experiments,
implying a small decrease in pore size at the outlet.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Diffusion coefficient</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> displays the results of the two iodide diffusion
experiments performed before and after the dissolution experiment on
sample Bvl. The curves show the time evolution of iodide at the sink
reservoir, which is proportional to the cumulative mass of iodide that
has diffused through the sample Bvl until time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only the
steady-state phase is reported here, when the iodide concentration in
the sink cell increases linearly with time. Linear regression of the
steady-state portion yields the effective diffusion coefficient
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). Experimental results are summarized in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. After the dissolution experiment, the diffusion coefficient is increased
by 1 order of magnitude, as suggested by the noticeable increase in the slope of iodide
increment after dissolution. This increase is linked to
a decrease of the tortuosity coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 14.43 (highly
tortuous pore skeleton, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>) to 3.57. These values
of effective diffusion coefficients and tortuosity, as well as their evolution
with dissolution, are coherent with other
previous laboratory measurement done on limestone samples
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.67"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Permeability change</title>
      <p>The changes in the sample permeability with time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> induced by the dissolution experiment is reported in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. Unsurprisingly, permeability increases due to
calcite dissolution, as previously mentioned by other authors
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.68"/>. The
permeability increase rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes
drastically at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is surely associated with the breakthrough
of the main dissolution path (wormhole).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>From top to bottom: extracted skeleton on sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the formed wormholed in sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) replaced in sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where the resolved connected porosity appears
in yellow, extracted skeleton on sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  For
the extracted skeleton images, the blue to red scale colours
corresponds to pore-size increase indicated in pixels (up to
60 pxls for sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 234 pxls for sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>XMT analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Porosity evolution</title>
      <p>The total porosity calculated from the XMT images, on sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (before dissolution) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(after dissolution) is 17.13  and 22.80 %, respectively.  As explained
in the methodology section, several steps have been performed with
similar parameters in order to estimate the possible error of
assessment on this crucial step. We used five different segmentation
results to calculate the resolved porosity before and after the
dissolution experiment. The results are presented in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>. We can observe that decreasing the thresholding
value for the sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> induces a resolved
phase underestimation up to 13 % whereas increasing the threshold
value only causes an overestimation less than 0.5 %. These
calculations indicate that the smallest threshold values were used to
estimate the resolved phase volume avoiding huge
underestimations. After the dissolution experiment, an error (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 2) on the thresholding <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value carries out fewer changes on the
resolved phase estimation. Increasing and decreasing by 1 the
threshold <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value after the dissolution experiment has no effect on
the resolved phase estimation (error always lower than
0.26 %). Consequently, all the calculations done on the XMT images
were performed using the segmented images obtained
by setting the threshold value to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sensitivity analysis of the threshold value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value on the relative
fraction of the resolved phase volume (RPV [%]) for samples <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the relative error <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [%].</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.00017</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">7.81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Time evolution of permeability <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during dissolution
experiment of sample Bvl.  The corresponding 3-D images of the
resolved porosity for sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reported for the initial and final
percolation times.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Initially, the total porosity calculated on sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is characterized by 60.82 % of large pores (resolved porosity) and
39.18 % of small pores, lower than the voxel size (sub-resolved porosity).
After the dissolution experiment, the total porosity is mainly characterized
by a high amount of large pores (resolved porosity) which represents
68.51 % of the total porosity (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The total porosity
increase is thus mainly controlled by the increase of the resolved porosity.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows the resolved and sub-resolved porosities for
samples Bv<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>lbe</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Bv<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>laf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the sample length (which
corresponds to the flow direction during the dissolution experiment). We can
observe that both resolved and sub-resolved porosity increase along the sample
length. These porosity increases are homogeneous along the sample except for
the first millimetres of the sample where the resolved porosity increase
faster than in the remaining part of the sample. The same phenomenon is
observed for the sub-resolved porosity, where its increase is higher for the
first 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the sample. Similar trends of porosity increase due to
carbonate dissolution have been monitored by previous authors. Nevertheless,
no conclusion on the dissolution patterns can be proposed as
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.69"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.70"/> linked the homogeneous
porosity increase profile to homogeneous dissolution whereas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.71"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.72"/> observed wormhole
formation. These versatile conclusions are due to the complex structure and
pore geometry of the different limestone samples used. Visualising 3-D XMT
images, we can conclude that during the Bvl dissolution experiment a wormhole
was formed, which promoted a homogeneous porosity increase along the sample.</p>
      <p>One of the advantages of using 3-D XMT images is the ability to
distinguish the total porosity from the effective one, or in other
words from the connected porosity. Performing a connectivity
computation, we can evaluate which part of the total porosity is
actually contributing to the fluid flow. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> indicates the
volumes of the resolved and sub-resolved phases are indicated as well
as the volume of the connected resolved and sub-resolved phases with
the corresponding fraction of the connected part.  We can observe that
initially, the sample is mainly connected through the sub-resolved
phase, but after the dissolution experiment the resolved porous phase
becomes more connected and mostly contribute to the fluid
pathway. This increase in connectivity through the resolved porous
phase can be linked to the wormhole formation which represents
71.47 % of the connected resolved porous phase. Various other
small clusters compose the percolating resolved phase but none of
them is larger than 2 % of the total porous volume. The main
connected path after the dissolution experiment is imaged in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Porosity changes along samples <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Both resolved and sub-resolved porosities
are plotted.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Chord-length function along <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)) for
sample Bvl before and after the dissolution experiment.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Pore-size distribution</title>
      <p>The pore-size distribution of the resolved porous phase was calculated for
sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using two different methodologies. We
calculated the pore-size distribution (Psd) as explained in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>, computing the radius of the largest
inscribed sphere centred at every point of the pore space, provided
it is maximal for inclusion. We also estimated an equivalent pore-size
distribution by performing statistical measurement and calculating the
chord-length distribution functions (C-l). The chord-length
distribution functions for sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are plotted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> for the 3
directions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Results from both methodology (Psd and
C-l) are summarized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> where the pore volume
distribution is scaled according to the experimental RET thresholds.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Resolved (RPV) and total (TPV) phase volume [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and
connected resolved (connected-RPV) and total (connected-TPV) phase volume
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] with the respective connected resolved (connected-RF) and total
(connected-TF) fraction [%].</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">connected-RPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">connected-RF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">connected-TPV</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">connected-TF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1007.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">380.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1856.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1727.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">93.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1511.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1080.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2432.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2321.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">95.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> show that
initially, the sample is mainly composed of pores having small and
intermediate diameters. Most of the pores are smaller than
204.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (69.73 %) in diameter and no anisotropy is
observed. After the dissolution experiment, the chord-length
distribution evolved and a certain anisotropy appears. In sample
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the amount of small to intermediate pore
diameter decreased significantly to 11.27 % of pores smaller than
204.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter. Larger pores were formed due to the
dissolution process. A significant amount of pores
presenting diameters comprised between 1 and 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are measured
and pores having a diameter up to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction can
be found. It corresponds to the local face dissolution at the sample inlet inducing
large porosity increase (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Porosity change along samples <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Both resolved and sub-resolved porosities
are plotted.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The pore-size distribution (Psd) presents similar results than those
obtained by the chord-length function. Some discrepancies are observed
for sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the largest pore
diameter. With the Psd analysis, the highest pores have a diameter
comprised between 70 and 204.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas with the chord-length function, we calculated initially lower proportion of these
pores and a higher one for the largest pores (diameter higher than
204.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time scale of the different methods used in this study for
both laboratory and XMT images approaches.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f11.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Diffusion coefficient</title>
      <p>The effective diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff(XMT)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before and
after dissolution is obtained by computing randomly distributed
particles in the rock pores following the method describe in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> displays the
results of the two computations performed on
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The curves
show the mean squared displacement (Msd) for an interval time step
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For large time steps, the Msd is linearly dependent to the
effective diffusion coefficient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.73"/>.  Linear
regression of the steady-state portion yields the effective diffusion
coefficient. The obtained effective diffusion coefficient for Bvl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and Bvl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. As expected and
previously reported in the literature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.74"/>, the effective diffusion
coefficient increases after limestone dissolution experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>3-D image of the formed wormhole (blue) and initial non-connected
porosity presented in the final wormhole feature (grey).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/7/441/2016/se-7-441-2016-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Comparison and discussion</title>
      <p>This section compares the different parameters characterized using, on the one hand,
classical laboratory measurements and on the other hand, XMT
images. We first compared laboratory measurements and computational
analysis duration for each parameter,
in order to evaluate which approach is the most time consuming. The complete
image processing described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/> was performed on a workstation equipped with two quad-core Intel Xeon CPU
X5560 @2.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GHz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 192 GB DDR3 RAM. We can observe in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> that globally, even if the computer used here is
not a high end build, the total analysis time for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much
shorter using image processing than the time analysis for performing laboratory
measurements. The total time needed to extract the different
parameters discussed in this article from the XMT images is 23 days,
whereas the time required to determine the same parameters using
laboratory measurements is 60 days. Moreover, some specific
processing (namely skeletonization) were performed using basic,
non-optimized implementations of classical algorithms that can be
found in open source software packages such as ImageJ. Besides, in
most cases, data extracted from XMT images provided more information
than the desired parameters studied in this article. Considering
porosity, only effective porosity can be determinated by
the experimental triple weighing method, whereas both effective and
total porosities can easily be calculated from the XMT images. Total
porosity can be a key parameter when chemical processes such as
dissolution occurred. The final porosity closely depends on the initial
effective porosity, the porosity created by dissolution and part of
the initially closed porosity that the dissolution process made
accessible. Porosity determination with helium pycnometry is a fast and
non-destructive alternative not used in this study.</p>
      <p>However, the main drawback of the XMT image analysis is the high dependence
of all parameters on the voxel size. When using different laboratory
techniques to measure the desired parameters, various resolution scales can
be achieved. For example, the total fluid–rock interface determined by BET
measurement has higher resolution than the one determined by XMT images.
Specifically, the grain roughness as well as grains smaller than the XMT
resolution (7.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) cannot be measured and the water–rock
interface area is underestimated a priori.</p>
      <p>Nevertheless, for most of the determined parameters, good agreement is
observed between the data computed from XMT images and the data measured
experimentally. As observed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, the initial porosity
determined by the triple weighing method is only different from the effective
porosity extracted from XMT images by 0.74 %. After the dissolution
experiment, the estimated porosity is quite similar even if the difference is
more important. The final porosity determined by the mass balance calculation
is the lowest one (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>f(chem)</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>19.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). As
explained before, the slight difference between the porosity obtained by
triple weighing and mass balance calculation can be explained by the
connection of initially non-connected pores to the new connected porosity by
the dissolution process. Actually, the porosity calculated by the mass
balance is only affected by dissolution. In this case, if only initial
effective porosity and mass balance are used, the final porosity can be
underestimated. Indeed, as observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> a
volume of 32 mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of non-connected pores is initially present in the final
wormhole feature. The porosity measured by the triple weighing method is
smaller than the one estimated from the XMT images. This difference can be
due to the formation of highly connected pathways (wormholes) percolating the
entire core. This very permeable fluid pathway in the sample after the
dissolution experiment represents an important water leak pathway where some
water can flow out of the sample, leading to an underestimation of the saturated
sample weighing. Regarding porosity measurement and analysis, we can conclude
that porosity calculated from the XMT images is the most reasonable, as we
can distinguish the effective one from the total one. Moreover the time
required to calculate the XMT porosities is much shorter than the one needed
by the triple weighing method.</p>
      <p>The same conclusion cannot be drawn for the pore-size diameter
distribution. For this parameter, the retention curves acquisition
allows to classify pores with diameters smaller than the XMT images
voxel size (7.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> displays
the pore-size distributions before and after the dissolution
experiment determined by three different methods: measuring the
retention curves of the core sample via laboratory experiments (RET),
calculating the larger sphere inscribed in the pore space (Psd) and
measuring the chord-length distribution function (C-l) on the XMT
images. As already mentioned, we can see that the pore-size
distribution obtained by the retention curves analysis allows to
determine the quantity of pore with radii down to
0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Results from Psd and C-l are quite similar. In
sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the C-l methods determined a higher
amount of very large pores, whereas the Psd methods estimated larger
content of pores with radii comprised between 34.99 and
102.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After the dissolution experiment, for both
techniques based on the XMT images the fraction of the largest pores
increases significantly. This increase of the amount of large pore is
in agreement with the dissolution process and the formation of
a preferential flow path (wormhole). Comparing with the RET method, we
observed that the RET pore-size distribution underestimates the
largest pores and the smallest pores are certainly overestimated. This
large difference can be attributed to the basic definition of a pore
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.75"/>. Indeed, during retention curves
measurement, the volume of pore estimated for a given suction pressure
correspond to the volume of extracted water through a corresponding
throat. Consequently, this laboratory technique gives a mixed
estimation between pore and throat distribution, underestimating the
largest pores and overestimating the smallest ones. It might be
interesting to simulate drainage and imbition experiments using the XMT
images as previously done by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.76"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.77"/> in order to compare the laboratory RET
measurements in a further study. To summarize, one should note
that the pore-size distribution obtained by the retention curves indicates the capillary
pressure needed to extract a specific fluid volume, but without any
information about the amount of pores containing this fluid volume and
the respective pore diameters. The two other methods used here to
extract the pore-size distribution using the XMT images allow us to
determine the pore-size diameter at each voxel point with some
anisotropy information (C-l technique). Nevertheless, with these two
methods, we don't have any knowledge about the connectivity and the
accessibility to these pores.  Using the extracted skeleton, we can
extract both pore and throat distributions and localize them in the
3-D sample. This fourth method gives the best pore and throat size
distribution and their localization (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>
      <p>The third main parameter measured experimentally and using XMT images is the
effective diffusion coefficient. By the utilization of a laboratory through diffusion experiments,
determination of the diffusion coefficient is time consuming
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>) and strongly depends on sample length as the diffusion
time increases with the squared length. Using the XMT images, the calculation
of the effective diffusion coefficient is very efficient and performed in
less than 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results of both methods are presented in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. The values obtained by laboratory measurements and
statistical modelling are similar. With both techniques, the effective
diffusion coefficient increased after the dissolution experiment by 1 order
of magnitude. Consequently, the tortuosity coefficient decreased after the
dissolution experiment and both values for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>be</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Bvl</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>af</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar for laboratory measurements and image
based computations. The statistical estimation using XMT images is a good
option to determine the effective diffusion coefficient as the time needed is
1500 times faster than the utilization of a laboratory through diffusion experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this paper, we have shown that microtomographic imaging hardware
and computational techniques have progressed to the point where
properties such as effective diffusion coefficient, conductivity and
pore-size distribution can be calculated on large three-dimensional
digitized images of real core rock sample.  We demonstrated that for
most of the parameters studied here, the values obtained by computing
XMT images are in agreement with the classical laboratory
measurements. For some parameters, such as the porosity, the
computational one is the more informative, as one can calculate both
total and effective porosity. As discussed here, when dissolution
process occurs, the knowledge of the total porosity can be necessary.
As the definition of pore is highly discussed in the scientific
community, we observed that the pore-size distributions obtained by
XMT images and laboratory experiments are slightly different. We
highlighted advantages and limitations of both approaches: the RET
measurement allows to determine the accessible volume for a given
capillary pressure, whereas Psd and C-l methods extract the maximum
pore volume locally without information of its accessibility.
Concerning the effective diffusion coefficient, we observed that both
approaches are valuable and similar results are
obtained. Nevertheless, the duration of a laboratory through-diffusion
experiment is much longer than the time required by the computational
option (about 1500 times longer).</p>
      <p>As a conclusion, computing XMT images to determine transport,
geometrical, and petrophysical parameters provide similar results than
the one measured at the laboratory in only 23 days instead of
60 days for the laboratory option. Moreover, the studied sample presents
both resolved and sub-resolved porosities, which would be the case for any
other type of natural or synthetic porous material, whatever the acquisition
technique. Thus, the framework developed in this work is relevant and can be
easily applied in many contexts.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, new developments are expected in a near future favouring
microtomographic imaging at higher resolutions with faster acquisition times
allowing dynamical effects to be imaged,
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.78"/>). Further
developments using the extracted skeleton will also allow us to extract the
accessible pore volume and the capillary pressure needed to ingress.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to acknowledge Arnaud Chabanel from EURL Thomann Hanry
(Carriéres de Vers Est) to provide us the rock sample and
Paul Tafforeau from ESRF for the X-ray microtomography images
acquisition. L. Luquot is funded by the Juan de la Cierva fellowship
(MINECO, Spain).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by:  H. Steeb</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adamson and Gast(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Adamson, A. W. and Gast, A. P.: Physical Chemistry of Surfaces,
Wiley, New York, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alshibli and Reed(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Alshibli, K. A. and Reed, A. H. (Eds.): Advances in Computed
Tomography for Geomaterials: GeoX 2010, Wiley, New York, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Archie(1942)</label><mixed-citation>Archie, G. E.: The electrical
resisitivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir
characteristics, Soc. Petrol. Eng., 146, 54–62,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/942054-G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2118/942054-G</ext-link>, 1942.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Arns et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Knackstedt, F., M., and
Pinczewski, W.: Accurate estimation of transport properties from
microtomographic images, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3361–3364,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Arns et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Knackstedt, M., Pinczewski, W.,
and Garboczi, E.: Computation of linear elastic properties from
microtomographic images: methodology and agreement between theory
and experiment, Geophysics, 67, 1396–1405, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Arns et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Bauget, F., Ghous, A.,
Sakellario, A., Senden, T., Sheppard, A., Sok, R., Pinczewski, W.,
Kelly, J., and Knackstedt, M.: Digital core laboratory:
petrophysical analysis from 3D imaging of reservoir core fragments,
Petrophysics, 46, 260–277, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Arns et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Bauget, F.,
Limaye, A., Sakellariou, A., Senden, T., Sheppard, A., Sok, R.,
Pinczewski, W., Bakke, S., Berge, L., Oren, R., and Knackstedt, M.:
Pore-scale characterization of carbonates using X-ray
microtomography, SPE J., 10, 475–484, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Arns et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A.,
Pinczewski, W. V., and Martys, N. S.: Virtual permeametry on
microtomographic images, J. Petrol. Sci. Geol., 45, 41–46, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Baker and Friedman(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, S. and Friedman, G. M.: A non-destructive core analysis
technique using X-rays, J. Sediment. Petrol., 39, 1371–1383,
1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Barrante(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Barrante, J. (Ed.): Applied
Mathematics for Physical Chemistry, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Becker and Shapiro(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Becker, M. and Shapiro, A.: Interpreting tracer breakthrough tailing
from different forced-gradient tracer experiment configurations in
fractured bedrock, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1024, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001WR001190</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Bjerreskov(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Bjerreskov, M.:   Discoveries on graptolites by X-ray studies, Acta Palaeontol. Pol.,
21, 463–471, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Boving and Grathwohl(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Boving, T. B. and Grathwohl, P.: Tracer diffusion coefficients in
sedimentary rocks: correlation to porosity and hydraulic
conductivity, J. Contam. Hydrol., 53, 85–100,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00138-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00138-3</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Bultreys et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Bultreys, T., Boone, M., Boone, M., De Schryver, T., Masschaele, B.,
Van Hoorebeke, L., and Cnudde, V.: Fast laboratory-based
micro-computed tomography for pore-scale research: illustrative
experiments and perspectives on the future, Adv. Water Resour., 1–11,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.012</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Calvert and Veevers(1962)</label><mixed-citation>Calvert, S. E. and Veevers, J. J.: Minor structures of
unconsolidated marine sediments revealed by X-radiography,
Sedimentology, 1, 287–295,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1962.tb01151.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3091.1962.tb01151.x</ext-link>, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Carroll et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Carroll, S., Hao, Y., Smith, M., and
Sholokhova, Y.: Development of scaling parameters to describe
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–rock interactions within Weyburn-Midale carbonate flow
units, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 16, S185–S193,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.026</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Casteleyn et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Casteleyn, L., Robion, P.,
David, C., Collin, P.-Y., Menendez, B., Fernandes, N.,
Desaubliaux, G., and Rigollet, C.: An integrated study of the
petrophysical properties of carbonate rocks from the “Oolithe
Blanche” formation in the Paris Basin, Tectonophysics, 503, 18–33,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.031</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cnudde and Boone(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Cnudde, V. and
Boone, M.: High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences:
a review of the current technology and applications,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 123, 1–17,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Coker and Torquato(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Coker, D. A. and Torquato, S.: Simulation of diffusion and trapping
in digitized heterogeneous media, J. Appl. Phys., 77, 955–964,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.358940" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.358940</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Crank(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Crank, J.: The Mathematics of
Diffusion, Oxford University Press, Ely House, London, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Cui et al.(2004)Cui, Bustin, and Dipple</label><mixed-citation>Cui, X., Bustin, R., and Dipple, G.: Selective transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in coals: insights from
modeling of experimental gas adsorption data, Fuel, 83, 293–303,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Cui et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Cui, X., Bustin, A. M. M., and Bustin, R. M.: Measurements of gas
permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different
approaches and their applications, Geofluids, 9, 208–223,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2009.00244.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-8123.2009.00244.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Douissard et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Douissard, P.-A., Cecilia, A.,
Rochet, X., Chapel, X., Martin, T., Van De Kamp, T., Helfen, L.,
Baumbach, T., Luquot, L., Xiao, X., Meinhardt, J., and Rack, A.:
A versatile indirect detector design for hard X-ray microimaging,
J. Instrum., 7, P09016,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/7/09/P09016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-0221/7/09/P09016</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Dunsmuir et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Dunsmuir, J., Ferguson, S.,
D'Amico, K., and Stokes, J. P.: X-ray micro tomography. A new tool
for the characterization of porous media, SPE J., 22860,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22860-MS" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2118/22860-MS</ext-link>,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Einstein(1956)</label><mixed-citation>
Einstein, A.: Investigations
on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, edited by: Furth, R.,
translated by: Cowper, A. D., Dover Publications, New York, 1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Elkhoury et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Elkhoury, J. E., Ameli, P., and
Detwiler, R. L.: Dissolution and deformation in fractured carbonates
caused by flow of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich brine under reservoir conditions,
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 16S, S203–S215,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.023</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Espinoza and Santamarina(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Espinoza, D. N. and Santamarina, J. C.: Water <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral
systems: interfacial tension, contact angle, and diffusion
implication to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geological storage, Water Resour.  Res.,
46, W07537, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009WR008634</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Fick(1855)</label><mixed-citation>
Fick, A.: Ueber diffusion,
Ann. Phys., 170,
59–89, 1855.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Fredd and Fogler(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Fredd, C. N. and Fogler, H. S.: Influence of transport and reaction
on wormhole formation in porous media, AIChE J., 44, 1933–1949,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Garing et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Garing, C., Luquot, L., Pezard, P., and
Gouze, P.: Electrical and flow properties of highly heterogeneous
carbonate rocks, AAPG Bull., 98, 49–66,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/05221312134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/05221312134</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Gillham et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Gillham, R. W., Sudicky, E. A.,
Cherry, J. A., and Frind, E. O.: An advection–diffusion concept for
solute transport in heterogeneous unconsolidated geological
deposits, Water Resour. Res., 20, 369–378,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR020i003p00369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR020i003p00369</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Gouze and Luquot(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Gouze, P. and
Luquot, L.: X-ray microtomography characterization of porosity,
permeability and reactive surface changes during dissolution,
J. Contam. Hydrol., 120–121, 44–55, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Hamblin(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Hamblin, W.: X-ray radiography
in the study of structures in homogeneous sediments,
J. Sediment. Petrol., 32, 133–145, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Hatiboglu and Babadagli(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Hatiboglu, C. U. and Babadagli, T.: Experimental and visual analysis
of diffusive mass transfer between matrix and fracture under static
conditions, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 74, 31–40,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.petrol.2010.08.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Herm(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Herm, D.: Paleontology,
Naturwissenschaften, 63, 81–86, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hinai et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Hinai, A. A., Rezaee, R., Esteban, L.,
and Labani, M.: Comparisons of pore size distribution: a case from
the Western Australian gas shale formations, Journal of
Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 8, 1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.002</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Hoshen and Kopelman(1976)</label><mixed-citation>Hoshen, J. and Kopelman, R.: Percolation and cluster
distribution. I. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical
concentration algorithm, Phys. Rev. B, 14, 3438–3445,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.14.3438" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevB.14.3438</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Ketcham and Carlson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Ketcham, R. A. and Carlson, W. D.: Acquisition, optimization and
interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications
to the geosciences, Comput. Geosci., 27, 381–400,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00116-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00116-3</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Knackstedt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Knackstedt, M. A., Arns, C. H.,
Saadatfar, M., Senden, T. J., Limaye, A., Sakellariou, A.,
Sheppard, A. P., Sok, R. M., Schrof, W., and Steininger, H.: Elastic
and transport properties of cellular solids derived from
three-dimensional tomographic images, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat.,
462, 2833–2862,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2006.1657</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lamande et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Lamande, M., Wildenschild, D.,
Berisso, F. E., Garbout, A., Marsh, M., Moldrup, P., Keller, T.,
Hansen, S. B., de Jonge, L. W., and Schjonning, P.: X-ray CT and
laboratory measurements on glacial till subsoil cores: assessment of
inherent and compaction-affected soil structure characteristics,
Soil Sci., 178, 359–368,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182a79e1a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1097/SS.0b013e3182a79e1a</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Landry et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Landry, C., Karpyn, Z., and Ayala, O.:
Pore-scale lattice Boltzmann modeling and 4D X-ray computed
microtomography imaging of fracture-matrix fluid transfer, Transport
Porous Med., 103, 449–468,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0311-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11242-014-0311-x</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Lee et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, T.-C., Kashyap, R. L., and Chu, C.-N.: Building skeleton models
via 3-D medial surface axis thinning algorithms,
CVGIP-Graph. Model. Im., 56, 462–478,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cgip.1994.1042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/cgip.1994.1042</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Li and Gregory(1974)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y.-H. and
Gregory, S.: Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 38, 703–714,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Louis et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Louis, L., Wong, T.-F., and Baud, P.: Imaging strain localization by
X-ray radiography and digital image correlation: deformation bands
in Rothbach sandstone, J. Struct. Geol., 29, 129–140,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.015</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Luquot and Gouze(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Luquot, L. and
Gouze, P.: Experimental determination of porosity and permeability
changes induced by injection of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into carbonate rocks,
Chem. Geol., 265, 148–159, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Luquot et al.(2014a)</label><mixed-citation>Luquot, L., Rodriguez, O., and Gouze, P.:
Experimental characterization of porosity structure and transport
property changes in limestone undergoing different dissolution
regimes, Transport Porous Med., 101, 507–532,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-013-0257-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11242-013-0257-4</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Luquot et al.(2014b)</label><mixed-citation>Luquot, L., Roetting, T., and
Carrera, J.: Characterization of flow parameters and evidence of
pore clogging during limestone dissolution experiments, Water
Resour. Res., 50, 6305, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013WR015193</ext-link>,
2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Mangane et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Mangane, P. O., Gouze, P., and
Luquot, L.: Permeability impairment of a limestone reservoir
triggered by heterogeneous dissolution and particles migration
during <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich injection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40,
4614–4619,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50595</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Martys et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Martys, N., Hagedorn, J., Goujon, D.,
and Devaney, J.: Large scale simulations of single and
multi-component flow in porous media, SPIE, 3772, 309–403, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Mecke(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Mecke, K. R.: Additivity,
convexity, and beyond: application of Minkovski functionals in
statistical physics, Lect. Notes Phys., 554, 11–184,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Meijster et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Meijster, A., Roerdink, J. B., and
Hesselink, W. H.: A general algorithm for computing distance
transforms in linear time, in: Mathematical Morphology and its
Applications to Image and Signal Processing,     Springer Science<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Business Media, New York, 331–340,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Menke et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Menke, H. P., Bijeljic, B., Andrew, M. G.,
and Blunt, M. J.: Dynamic three-dimensional pore-scale imaging of
reaction in a carbonate at reservoir conditions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4407–4414,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es505789f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es505789f</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Monna et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Monna, F., Lancelot, J., Bernat, M.,
and Mercadier, H.: Sedimentation rate in the Thau Basin (France)
according to geochronological, geochemical and stratigraphical data,
Oceanol. Acta, 20, 627–638, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Nestle et al.(2001a)</label><mixed-citation>Nestle, N., Galvosas, P., Geier, O., Dakkouri, M., Zimmermann, C.,
and Kärger, J.: {NMR} studies of water diffusion and
relaxation in hydrating slag-based construction materials,
Magn. Reson. Imaging, 19, 547–548,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00301-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00301-0</ext-link>, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Nestle et al.(2001b)</label><mixed-citation>Nestle, N.,
Zimmermann, C., Dakkouri, M., and Niessner, R.: Action and
distribution of organic solvent contaminations in hydrating cement:
time-resolved insights into solidification of organic waste,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4953–4956,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es015528y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es015528y</ext-link>,
2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Nimmo(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Nimmo, J.: Porosity and pore size
distribution, in: Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, edited
by: Hillel, D., Elsevier, London, 295–303, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Noiriel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Noiriel, C., Luquot, L.,
Made, B., Raimbault, L., Gouze, P., and van der Lee, J.: Changes in
reactive surface area during limestone dissolution: an experimental
and modelling study, Chem. Geol., 265, 160–170, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Peng et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Peng, S., Hu, Q., and Hamamoto, S.: Diffusivity of rocks: gas
diffusion measurements and correlation to porosity and pore size
distribution, Water Resour. Res., 48, w02507,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011WR011098</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Prodanovic et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Prodanovic, M., Bryant, S. L., and
Karpyn, Z. T.: Investigating matrix/fracture transfer via a level
set method for drainage and imbibition, SPE J., 15, 125–136,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116110-PA" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2118/116110-PA</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Promentilla et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Promentilla, M., Sugiyama, T.,
Hitomi, T., and Takeda, N.: Quantification of tortuosity in hardened
cement pastes using synchrotron-based X-ray computed
microtomography, Cement Concrete Res., 39, 548–557,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.03.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.03.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Reatto et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Reatto, A., da Silva, E., Bruand, A.,
Martins, E., and Lima, J.: Validata of the centrifuge method for
determining the water retention properties of tropical soils, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1547–1553, 2008.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Remeysen and Swennen(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Remeysen, K. and Swennen, R.: Application of microfocus computed
tomography in carbonate reservoir characterization: possibilities
and limitations, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 25, 486–499,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.07.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.07.008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Roberts and Garboczi(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, A. P. and Garboczi, E. J.: Elastic properties of model
porous ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83, 3041–3048,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2313</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Robinson and Stokes(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, R. and Stokes, R. H.: Electrolyte Solutions: the
Measurement and Interpretation of Conductance, Chemical Potential and
Diffusion in Solutions of Simple Electrolytes, Academic press University of New England, New York, Butterworths,
1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Roetting et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Roetting, T. S., Luquot, L.,
Carrera, J., and Casalinuovo, D. J.: Changes in porosity,
permeability, water retention curve and reactive surface area during
carbonate rock dissolution, Chem. Geol., 403, 86–98,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Schmidt et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, S., Jouanneau, J.-M., Weber, O., Lecroart, P.,
Radakovitch, O., Gilbert, F., and Jézéquel, D.: Sedimentary
processes in the Thau Lagoon (France): from seasonal to century time
scales, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 72, 534–542,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.11.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2006.11.019</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Schwartz et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwartz, L. M.,
Auzerais, F., Dunsmuir, J., Martys, N., Bentz, D. P., and
Torquato, S.: Transport and diffusion in three-dimensional composite
media, Physica A, 207, 28–36, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Sen(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Sen, P. N.: Time-dependent diffusion
coefficient as a probe of geometry, Concept. Magn. Reson. A, 23,
1–21,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cmr.a.20017</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Siddiqi and Pizer(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Siddiqi, K. and Pizer, S.: Medial Representations: Mathematics,
Algorithms and Applications, 1st Edn., Springer Publishing Company,
Incorporated, the Netherlands, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Smith et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Smith, M. M., Sholokhova, Y., Hao, Y.,
and Carroll, S. A.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced dissolution of low
permeability carbonates. Part I: Characterization and experiments,
Adv. Water Resour., 62, 370–387,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Sturmer(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Sturmer, W.: X-ray photography
in paleontology-some new results, Naturwissenschaften, 60, 407–411,
1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Taina et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Taina, I. A., Heck, R. J., and Elliot, T. R.: Application of X-ray
computed tomography to soil science: a literature review, Can.
J. Soil Sci., 88, 1–19,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJSS06027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4141/CJSS06027</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Torquato(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Torquato, S.: Random
Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties,
Springer-Verlag,  New York, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>van Brakel and Heertjes(1974)</label><mixed-citation>van Brakel, J. and Heertjes, P.: Analysis of diffusion in
macroporous media in terms of a porosity, a tortuosity and
a constrictivity factor, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 17, 1093–1103,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(74)90190-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0017-9310(74)90190-2</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Vogel et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, H.-J., Weller, U., and
Schlüter, S.: Quantification of soil structure based on
Minkowski functions, Comput.  Geosci., 36, 1236–1245,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Wildenschild and Sheppard(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Wildenschild, D. and Sheppard, A. P.: X-ray imaging and analysis techniques
for quantifying pore-scale structure and processes in subsurface porous
medium systems, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 217–246,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Calculating structural and geometrical parameters by laboratory
measurements and X-ray microtomography: a comparative study applied
to a limestone sample before and after a dissolution experiment</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The aim of this study is to compare the structural, geometrical and
transport parameters of a limestone rock sample determined by X-ray
microtomography (XMT) images and laboratory experiments.  Total and
effective porosity, pore-size distribution, tortuosity, and effective
diffusion coefficient have been estimated.  Sensitivity analyses of
the segmentation parameters
have been performed.  The limestone rock sample studied here has
been characterized using both approaches before and after a reactive
percolation experiment.  Strong dissolution process occurred during
the percolation, promoting a wormhole formation.  This strong
heterogeneity formed after the percolation step allows us to apply our
methodology to two different samples and enhance the use of
experimental techniques or XMT images depending on the rock
heterogeneity.  We established that for most of the parameters
calculated here, the values obtained by computing XMT images are in
agreement with the classical laboratory measurements.  We
demonstrated that the computational porosity is more informative
than the laboratory measurement.  We observed that pore-size distributions
obtained by XMT images and laboratory experiments are slightly
different but complementary.  Regarding the effective diffusion
coefficient, we concluded that both approaches are valuable and give
similar results.  Nevertheless, we concluded that computing XMT
images to determine transport, geometrical, and petrophysical
parameters provide similar results to those measured at the
laboratory but with much shorter durations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adamson and Gast(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Adamson, A. W. and Gast, A. P.: Physical Chemistry of Surfaces,
Wiley, New York, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alshibli and Reed(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Alshibli, K. A. and Reed, A. H. (Eds.): Advances in Computed
Tomography for Geomaterials: GeoX 2010, Wiley, New York, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Archie(1942)</label><mixed-citation>
Archie, G. E.: The electrical
resisitivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir
characteristics, Soc. Petrol. Eng., 146, 54–62,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/942054-G" target="_blank">doi:10.2118/942054-G</a>, 1942.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Arns et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Knackstedt, F., M., and
Pinczewski, W.: Accurate estimation of transport properties from
microtomographic images, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3361–3364,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Arns et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Knackstedt, M., Pinczewski, W.,
and Garboczi, E.: Computation of linear elastic properties from
microtomographic images: methodology and agreement between theory
and experiment, Geophysics, 67, 1396–1405, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Arns et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Bauget, F., Ghous, A.,
Sakellario, A., Senden, T., Sheppard, A., Sok, R., Pinczewski, W.,
Kelly, J., and Knackstedt, M.: Digital core laboratory:
petrophysical analysis from 3D imaging of reservoir core fragments,
Petrophysics, 46, 260–277, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Arns et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C., Bauget, F.,
Limaye, A., Sakellariou, A., Senden, T., Sheppard, A., Sok, R.,
Pinczewski, W., Bakke, S., Berge, L., Oren, R., and Knackstedt, M.:
Pore-scale characterization of carbonates using X-ray
microtomography, SPE J., 10, 475–484, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Arns et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A.,
Pinczewski, W. V., and Martys, N. S.: Virtual permeametry on
microtomographic images, J. Petrol. Sci. Geol., 45, 41–46, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Baker and Friedman(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, S. and Friedman, G. M.: A non-destructive core analysis
technique using X-rays, J. Sediment. Petrol., 39, 1371–1383,
1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Barrante(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Barrante, J. (Ed.): Applied
Mathematics for Physical Chemistry, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Becker and Shapiro(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Becker, M. and Shapiro, A.: Interpreting tracer breakthrough tailing
from different forced-gradient tracer experiment configurations in
fractured bedrock, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1024, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001190" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001WR001190</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Bjerreskov(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Bjerreskov, M.:   Discoveries on graptolites by X-ray studies, Acta Palaeontol. Pol.,
21, 463–471, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Boving and Grathwohl(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Boving, T. B. and Grathwohl, P.: Tracer diffusion coefficients in
sedimentary rocks: correlation to porosity and hydraulic
conductivity, J. Contam. Hydrol., 53, 85–100,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00138-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00138-3</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Bultreys et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Bultreys, T., Boone, M., Boone, M., De Schryver, T., Masschaele, B.,
Van Hoorebeke, L., and Cnudde, V.: Fast laboratory-based
micro-computed tomography for pore-scale research: illustrative
experiments and perspectives on the future, Adv. Water Resour., 1–11,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.012</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Calvert and Veevers(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, S. E. and Veevers, J. J.: Minor structures of
unconsolidated marine sediments revealed by X-radiography,
Sedimentology, 1, 287–295,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1962.tb01151.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1962.tb01151.x</a>, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Carroll et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Carroll, S., Hao, Y., Smith, M., and
Sholokhova, Y.: Development of scaling parameters to describe
CO<sub>2</sub>–rock interactions within Weyburn-Midale carbonate flow
units, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 16, S185–S193,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.026" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.026</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Casteleyn et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Casteleyn, L., Robion, P.,
David, C., Collin, P.-Y., Menendez, B., Fernandes, N.,
Desaubliaux, G., and Rigollet, C.: An integrated study of the
petrophysical properties of carbonate rocks from the “Oolithe
Blanche” formation in the Paris Basin, Tectonophysics, 503, 18–33,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.031" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.031</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cnudde and Boone(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Cnudde, V. and
Boone, M.: High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences:
a review of the current technology and applications,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 123, 1–17,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Coker and Torquato(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Coker, D. A. and Torquato, S.: Simulation of diffusion and trapping
in digitized heterogeneous media, J. Appl. Phys., 77, 955–964,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.358940" target="_blank">doi:10.1063/1.358940</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Crank(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Crank, J.: The Mathematics of
Diffusion, Oxford University Press, Ely House, London, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Cui et al.(2004)Cui, Bustin, and Dipple</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, X., Bustin, R., and Dipple, G.: Selective transport of
CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub> in coals: insights from
modeling of experimental gas adsorption data, Fuel, 83, 293–303,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.001</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Cui et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, X., Bustin, A. M. M., and Bustin, R. M.: Measurements of gas
permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different
approaches and their applications, Geofluids, 9, 208–223,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2009.00244.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1468-8123.2009.00244.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Douissard et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Douissard, P.-A., Cecilia, A.,
Rochet, X., Chapel, X., Martin, T., Van De Kamp, T., Helfen, L.,
Baumbach, T., Luquot, L., Xiao, X., Meinhardt, J., and Rack, A.:
A versatile indirect detector design for hard X-ray microimaging,
J. Instrum., 7, P09016,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/7/09/P09016" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/09/P09016</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Dunsmuir et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Dunsmuir, J., Ferguson, S.,
D'Amico, K., and Stokes, J. P.: X-ray micro tomography. A new tool
for the characterization of porous media, SPE J., 22860,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22860-MS" target="_blank">doi:10.2118/22860-MS</a>,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Einstein(1956)</label><mixed-citation>
Einstein, A.: Investigations
on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, edited by: Furth, R.,
translated by: Cowper, A. D., Dover Publications, New York, 1956.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Elkhoury et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Elkhoury, J. E., Ameli, P., and
Detwiler, R. L.: Dissolution and deformation in fractured carbonates
caused by flow of CO<sub>2</sub>-rich brine under reservoir conditions,
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 16S, S203–S215,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.023" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.023</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Espinoza and Santamarina(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Espinoza, D. N. and Santamarina, J. C.: Water CO<sub>2</sub> mineral
systems: interfacial tension, contact angle, and diffusion
implication to CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage, Water Resour.  Res.,
46, W07537, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008634" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009WR008634</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Fick(1855)</label><mixed-citation>
Fick, A.: Ueber diffusion,
Ann. Phys., 170,
59–89, 1855.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Fredd and Fogler(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Fredd, C. N. and Fogler, H. S.: Influence of transport and reaction
on wormhole formation in porous media, AIChE J., 44, 1933–1949,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Garing et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Garing, C., Luquot, L., Pezard, P., and
Gouze, P.: Electrical and flow properties of highly heterogeneous
carbonate rocks, AAPG Bull., 98, 49–66,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/05221312134" target="_blank">doi:10.1306/05221312134</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Gillham et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Gillham, R. W., Sudicky, E. A.,
Cherry, J. A., and Frind, E. O.: An advection–diffusion concept for
solute transport in heterogeneous unconsolidated geological
deposits, Water Resour. Res., 20, 369–378,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR020i003p00369" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/WR020i003p00369</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Gouze and Luquot(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Gouze, P. and
Luquot, L.: X-ray microtomography characterization of porosity,
permeability and reactive surface changes during dissolution,
J. Contam. Hydrol., 120–121, 44–55, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Hamblin(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Hamblin, W.: X-ray radiography
in the study of structures in homogeneous sediments,
J. Sediment. Petrol., 32, 133–145, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Hatiboglu and Babadagli(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Hatiboglu, C. U. and Babadagli, T.: Experimental and visual analysis
of diffusive mass transfer between matrix and fracture under static
conditions, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 74, 31–40,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.08.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2010.08.004</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Herm(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Herm, D.: Paleontology,
Naturwissenschaften, 63, 81–86, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hinai et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Hinai, A. A., Rezaee, R., Esteban, L.,
and Labani, M.: Comparisons of pore size distribution: a case from
the Western Australian gas shale formations, Journal of
Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 8, 1–13,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.002</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Hoshen and Kopelman(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoshen, J. and Kopelman, R.: Percolation and cluster
distribution. I. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical
concentration algorithm, Phys. Rev. B, 14, 3438–3445,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.14.3438" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.14.3438</a>, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Ketcham and Carlson(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ketcham, R. A. and Carlson, W. D.: Acquisition, optimization and
interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications
to the geosciences, Comput. Geosci., 27, 381–400,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00116-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00116-3</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Knackstedt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Knackstedt, M. A., Arns, C. H.,
Saadatfar, M., Senden, T. J., Limaye, A., Sakellariou, A.,
Sheppard, A. P., Sok, R. M., Schrof, W., and Steininger, H.: Elastic
and transport properties of cellular solids derived from
three-dimensional tomographic images, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat.,
462, 2833–2862,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1657" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rspa.2006.1657</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Lamande et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Lamande, M., Wildenschild, D.,
Berisso, F. E., Garbout, A., Marsh, M., Moldrup, P., Keller, T.,
Hansen, S. B., de Jonge, L. W., and Schjonning, P.: X-ray CT and
laboratory measurements on glacial till subsoil cores: assessment of
inherent and compaction-affected soil structure characteristics,
Soil Sci., 178, 359–368,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182a79e1a" target="_blank">doi:10.1097/SS.0b013e3182a79e1a</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Landry et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Landry, C., Karpyn, Z., and Ayala, O.:
Pore-scale lattice Boltzmann modeling and 4D X-ray computed
microtomography imaging of fracture-matrix fluid transfer, Transport
Porous Med., 103, 449–468,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0311-x" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11242-014-0311-x</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Lee et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T.-C., Kashyap, R. L., and Chu, C.-N.: Building skeleton models
via 3-D medial surface axis thinning algorithms,
CVGIP-Graph. Model. Im., 56, 462–478,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cgip.1994.1042" target="_blank">doi:10.1006/cgip.1994.1042</a>,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Li and Gregory(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y.-H. and
Gregory, S.: Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 38, 703–714,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0016-7037(74)90145-8</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Louis et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Louis, L., Wong, T.-F., and Baud, P.: Imaging strain localization by
X-ray radiography and digital image correlation: deformation bands
in Rothbach sandstone, J. Struct. Geol., 29, 129–140,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.015" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.015</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Luquot and Gouze(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Luquot, L. and
Gouze, P.: Experimental determination of porosity and permeability
changes induced by injection of CO<sub>2</sub> into carbonate rocks,
Chem. Geol., 265, 148–159, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Luquot et al.(2014a)</label><mixed-citation>
Luquot, L., Rodriguez, O., and Gouze, P.:
Experimental characterization of porosity structure and transport
property changes in limestone undergoing different dissolution
regimes, Transport Porous Med., 101, 507–532,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-013-0257-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11242-013-0257-4</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Luquot et al.(2014b)</label><mixed-citation>
Luquot, L., Roetting, T., and
Carrera, J.: Characterization of flow parameters and evidence of
pore clogging during limestone dissolution experiments, Water
Resour. Res., 50, 6305, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015193" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013WR015193</a>,
2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Mangane et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Mangane, P. O., Gouze, P., and
Luquot, L.: Permeability impairment of a limestone reservoir
triggered by heterogeneous dissolution and particles migration
during CO<sub>2</sub>-rich injection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40,
4614–4619,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50595" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/grl.50595</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Martys et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Martys, N., Hagedorn, J., Goujon, D.,
and Devaney, J.: Large scale simulations of single and
multi-component flow in porous media, SPIE, 3772, 309–403, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Mecke(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Mecke, K. R.: Additivity,
convexity, and beyond: application of Minkovski functionals in
statistical physics, Lect. Notes Phys., 554, 11–184,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Meijster et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Meijster, A., Roerdink, J. B., and
Hesselink, W. H.: A general algorithm for computing distance
transforms in linear time, in: Mathematical Morphology and its
Applications to Image and Signal Processing,     Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 331–340,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Menke et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Menke, H. P., Bijeljic, B., Andrew, M. G.,
and Blunt, M. J.: Dynamic three-dimensional pore-scale imaging of
reaction in a carbonate at reservoir conditions,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4407–4414,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es505789f" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es505789f</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Monna et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Monna, F., Lancelot, J., Bernat, M.,
and Mercadier, H.: Sedimentation rate in the Thau Basin (France)
according to geochronological, geochemical and stratigraphical data,
Oceanol. Acta, 20, 627–638, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Nestle et al.(2001a)</label><mixed-citation>
Nestle, N., Galvosas, P., Geier, O., Dakkouri, M., Zimmermann, C.,
and Kärger, J.: {NMR} studies of water diffusion and
relaxation in hydrating slag-based construction materials,
Magn. Reson. Imaging, 19, 547–548,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00301-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00301-0</a>, 2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Nestle et al.(2001b)</label><mixed-citation>
Nestle, N.,
Zimmermann, C., Dakkouri, M., and Niessner, R.: Action and
distribution of organic solvent contaminations in hydrating cement:
time-resolved insights into solidification of organic waste,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4953–4956,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es015528y" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/es015528y</a>,
2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Nimmo(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Nimmo, J.: Porosity and pore size
distribution, in: Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, edited
by: Hillel, D., Elsevier, London, 295–303, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Noiriel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Noiriel, C., Luquot, L.,
Made, B., Raimbault, L., Gouze, P., and van der Lee, J.: Changes in
reactive surface area during limestone dissolution: an experimental
and modelling study, Chem. Geol., 265, 160–170, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Peng et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, S., Hu, Q., and Hamamoto, S.: Diffusivity of rocks: gas
diffusion measurements and correlation to porosity and pore size
distribution, Water Resour. Res., 48, w02507,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011098" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011WR011098</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Prodanovic et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Prodanovic, M., Bryant, S. L., and
Karpyn, Z. T.: Investigating matrix/fracture transfer via a level
set method for drainage and imbibition, SPE J., 15, 125–136,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116110-PA" target="_blank">doi:10.2118/116110-PA</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Promentilla et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Promentilla, M., Sugiyama, T.,
Hitomi, T., and Takeda, N.: Quantification of tortuosity in hardened
cement pastes using synchrotron-based X-ray computed
microtomography, Cement Concrete Res., 39, 548–557,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.03.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.03.005</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Reatto et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Reatto, A., da Silva, E., Bruand, A.,
Martins, E., and Lima, J.: Validata of the centrifuge method for
determining the water retention properties of tropical soils, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1547–1553, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Remeysen and Swennen(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Remeysen, K. and Swennen, R.: Application of microfocus computed
tomography in carbonate reservoir characterization: possibilities
and limitations, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 25, 486–499,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.07.008" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.07.008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Roberts and Garboczi(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, A. P. and Garboczi, E. J.: Elastic properties of model
porous ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83, 3041–3048,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2313" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2313</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Robinson and Stokes(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, R. and Stokes, R. H.: Electrolyte Solutions: the
Measurement and Interpretation of Conductance, Chemical Potential and
Diffusion in Solutions of Simple Electrolytes, Academic press University of New England, New York, Butterworths,
1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Roetting et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Roetting, T. S., Luquot, L.,
Carrera, J., and Casalinuovo, D. J.: Changes in porosity,
permeability, water retention curve and reactive surface area during
carbonate rock dissolution, Chem. Geol., 403, 86–98,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.008" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.008</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Schmidt et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, S., Jouanneau, J.-M., Weber, O., Lecroart, P.,
Radakovitch, O., Gilbert, F., and Jézéquel, D.: Sedimentary
processes in the Thau Lagoon (France): from seasonal to century time
scales, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 72, 534–542,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.11.019" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.11.019</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Schwartz et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwartz, L. M.,
Auzerais, F., Dunsmuir, J., Martys, N., Bentz, D. P., and
Torquato, S.: Transport and diffusion in three-dimensional composite
media, Physica A, 207, 28–36, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Sen(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Sen, P. N.: Time-dependent diffusion
coefficient as a probe of geometry, Concept. Magn. Reson. A, 23,
1–21,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.20017" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/cmr.a.20017</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Siddiqi and Pizer(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Siddiqi, K. and Pizer, S.: Medial Representations: Mathematics,
Algorithms and Applications, 1st Edn., Springer Publishing Company,
Incorporated, the Netherlands, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Smith et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. M., Sholokhova, Y., Hao, Y.,
and Carroll, S. A.: CO<sub>2</sub>-induced dissolution of low
permeability carbonates. Part I: Characterization and experiments,
Adv. Water Resour., 62, 370–387,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.008" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.008</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Sturmer(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Sturmer, W.: X-ray photography
in paleontology-some new results, Naturwissenschaften, 60, 407–411,
1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Taina et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Taina, I. A., Heck, R. J., and Elliot, T. R.: Application of X-ray
computed tomography to soil science: a literature review, Can.
J. Soil Sci., 88, 1–19,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJSS06027" target="_blank">doi:10.4141/CJSS06027</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Torquato(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Torquato, S.: Random
Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties,
Springer-Verlag,  New York, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>van Brakel and Heertjes(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
van Brakel, J. and Heertjes, P.: Analysis of diffusion in
macroporous media in terms of a porosity, a tortuosity and
a constrictivity factor, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 17, 1093–1103,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(74)90190-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0017-9310(74)90190-2</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Vogel et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, H.-J., Weller, U., and
Schlüter, S.: Quantification of soil structure based on
Minkowski functions, Comput.  Geosci., 36, 1236–1245,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.007</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Wildenschild and Sheppard(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Wildenschild, D. and Sheppard, A. P.: X-ray imaging and analysis techniques
for quantifying pore-scale structure and processes in subsurface porous
medium systems, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 217–246,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
