<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-8-1153-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effects of spent mushroom compost application on the physicochemical properties of a degraded soil</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effects of {spent mushroom compost} application}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{\.{I}. G\"{u}m\"{u}\c{s} and C. \c{S}eker }?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gümüş</surname><given-names>İlknur</given-names></name>
          <email>ersoy@selcuk.edu.tr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Şeker</surname><given-names>Cevdet</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture,
University of Selçuk, 42031 Konya, Turkey</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">İlknur Gümüş (ersoy@selcuk.edu.tr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>1153</fpage><lpage>1160</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>18</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Under field and laboratory conditions, the application of organic amendments
has generally shown an improvement in soil physicochemical properties. Here,
spent mushroom compost (SMC) is proposed as a suitable organic amendment for
soil structure restoration. Our study assessed the impact of SMC on the
physicochemical properties of a weak-structured and physically degraded soil.
The approach involved the establishment of a pot experiment with SMC
applications into soil (control, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 %).
Soils were incubated at field capacity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 kPa) for 21, 42, and 62 days
under laboratory conditions. SMC applications into the soil significantly
increased the aggregate stability (AS) and decreased the modulus of rupture.
The application of SMC at rates of 1, 2, 4, and 8 %
significantly increased the total nitrogen and soil organic carbon contents of
the degraded soil at all incubation periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05). The results
obtained in this study indicate that the application of SMC can improve soil
physicochemical properties, which may benefit farmers, land managers, and
mushroom growers.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Soil quality is defined as the capacity of the soil to function within
natural or managed ecosystems and land use boundaries, sustain biological
productivity (Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2015), promote
air quality and water environments, and maintain plant, animal, and human
health (Doran et al., 1997; Karlen et al., 1997). Physical and chemical
properties are the main indicators used to assess soil quality (Bone et al.,
2014; Paz-Ferreiro and Fu, 2013; Pulido Moncada et al., 2015). Soil quality
can be threatened by the increase in human activities such as urbanization
and intensive agricultural activities (Paz-Ferreiro and Fu, 2013).
Moreover, it is an important aspect closely related to soil degradation,
which decreases land potential productivity (Yu and Jia, 2014). The climatic
patterns of dry lands can be divided into three types: arid, semiarid, and
subhumid dry areas from various factors, including climatic variations and
human activities (Yu and Jia, 2014). Soil degradation is a particularly
serious problem in Mediterranean areas where the effects of anthropogenic
activities are compounded by the problems caused by prolonged periods of
drought and intense and irregular rainfall (Hueso-González et al.,
2014; Rodrigo-Comino et al., 2016, 2017).
Vegetation degradation and land use change are among the soil degradation
factors that cause soil carbon and nitrogen losses (García-Díaz
et al., 2016, 2017; Moreno et al., 2016; Peng
et al., 2015). Deterioration in soil structure is considered a form of
soil degradation (Chan et al., 2003) and is frequent with regards to land
use and soil crop management practices.</p>
      <p>Soil physical degradation in agricultural areas occurs mostly as a
consequence of a decrease in soil organic matter caused by excessive soil
cultivation (Grandy et al., 2002). Intensive soil cultivation can lead to a
decrease in soil organic matter content, resulting in a decrease in
aggregate stability and a greater risk of soil erosion (Annabi et al.,
2011). Şeker and Karakaplan (1999) reported that the loss of organic
matter is generally associated with a decrease in soil porosity and wet
aggregate stability. Soil water movement and retention capacity, crusting,
root penetration, crop yield, erosion, and nutrient cycling are influenced
by soil structure (Bal et al., 2012; Bronick and Lal, 2005; Şeker, 2003).</p>
      <p>Organic materials are important soil additives that help to improve soil
physical, chemical, and biological properties and the overall soil fertility
(Wu et al., 2014). In addition to productive yields, these organic materials have
been beneficial for soil chemical and physical fertility and stability
(Mukherjee et al., 2014). Therefore, organic materials can be applied to
soils to increase their organic matter contents and restore their physical
properties, including soil aggregate stability (Annabi et al., 2011;
Özdemir et al., 2007). In semiarid regions such as Turkey, low organic
matter contents can significantly affect soil productivity (Gümüs
and Şeker, 2015).</p>
      <p>Mushroom cultivation has recently become very popular in Turkey and is a
promising new industry with many new businesses developing every year.
Mushroom production in Turkey is separated into two components: compost
production and mushroom cultivation (Erler and Polat, 2008; Tui̇k, 2015).
Compost application to agricultural soil has been widely practiced as one
approach to improve crop productivity and soil fertility (Jaiarree et
al., 2014). Spent mushroom compost is either spread on land or dumped in
landfills, and only a small proportion is used as a soil amendment or as
potting material (Ko et al., 2005; Zhang and Sun, 2014). Thus, this type of
compost can be used in organic farming to improve soil water infiltration,
water holding capacity, permeability, and aeration (Uzun, 2004). Composts
provide a stabilized form of organic matter that improves the physical
properties of soils by increasing both nutrient and water holding capacity,
total pore space, aggregate stability, erosion resistance, and temperature
insulation (Shiralipour et al., 1992). SMC possesses many beneficial
characteristics including a relatively low bulk density, a low level of
heavy metals, and an absence of plant pathogens and weed seeds (Curtin and
Mullen, 2007; Zhang and Sun, 2014).</p>
      <p>Therefore, the main goal of this study was to assess the effects of SMC
application to weak-structured and physically degraded soil in semiarid
Turkey with a specific emphasis on aggregate stability, the modulus of
rupture, electrical conductivity (EC), nitrogen, and organic carbon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p>Soil for our study was collected from an experimental plot at the
experiment station of the Agricultural Faculty at Selçuk University (0–20 cm top soil layer) near the
village of Konya Sarıcalar (30 km north of the
city of Konya) located in Central Anatolia, Turkey (latitude
38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, longitude 32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 1009 m a.s.l.). The experiment station
covers an area of 1200 ha and the climate
type is semiarid with annual precipitation of 379.38 mm, an annual mean
temperature of 11.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and annual mean evaporation of 1226.4 mm (MGM,
2015). Soil moisture and temperature regimes are xeric and mesic,
respectively, according to the available data (Soil Survey Staff, 2014).
Soil is classified as Entisol (Soil Survey Staff, 2014). The area has a typically
rain-fed attribute with cultivation practices and various crops such as
grains, sugar beet, and corn with fruit trees of various ages. Soil used in
this study has shown insufficient seedling emergency, low aggregate
stability, soil crust formation problem, and low organic matter content (Bal
et al., 2012). The SMC used in this study was obtained from a private company
dedicated to mass mushroom production located in Konya, Turkey.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Geographical location of the experiment station of the Agricultural Faculty at Selçuk
University.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p>The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized plot design with
three replications and conducted under laboratory conditions (22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) as a pot experiment. Surface soil samples (0–20 cm) were
air-dried, ground, passed through a 2 mm sieve, and mixed homogeneously.
First, soil samples (each weighing 2 kg) were placed in pots. Six levels of
SMC were mixed into the soil and incubated: 0 (as a control), 0.5, 1, 2,
4, and 8 % by weight basis. During the incubation
period, the soil moisture level in the pots was maintained at field
capacity. After various incubation periods (21, 42, and 62 days), soil
samples were collected from each pot and mixed to ensure homogeneity in the soil
subsamples. Soils were then subsampled (250 g) for analyses.</p>
      <p>Particle size distribution was determined by using the hydrometer method (Gee et
al., 1986). The soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point were
determined with a pressure plate device (Cassel and Nielsen, 1986) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1500 kPa, respectively. Soil pH and EC values were determined by using
a glass–calomel electrode in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixture (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of soil and water; SMC pH
and EC samples were mixed with water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rhoades et al., 1996; Thomas,
1996). Soil organic carbon was determined for samples ground to pass through a
0.5 mm sieve by the use of TruSpec CN Carbon/Nitrogen Determinator
(Leco Corporation, 2003).
The modulus of rupture was determined at 0.5 kPa of
sensitivity with the procedure of Richards (1953) using briquettes prepared in
moulds made from mild steel with a rectangular cross section and with interior
dimensions of 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 cm. The briquettes were prepared
by using sieved subsoil samples (&lt; 2 mm) taken from every pot,
which were then placed in a soaking tank of distilled water filled to the
upper surface of the mould. They were allowed to stand for 1 h, and then
dried at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The briquettes were broken by the downward motion of
a bar at a triangular cross section, with the force being applied by water
addition to a vessel. The modulus of rupture was calculated as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MR</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where MR is the modulus of rupture (kPa), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the breaking force in
grams of water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 980, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance between the lower supports
in cm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the width of the briquette in cm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the thickness of the
briquette in cm (Reeve, 1965; Richards, 1953). Aggregate stability was
determined by immersing the sieves containing the aggregate samples (1–2 mm size) in distilled water at up and down oscillations on screens
through 55 mm at 30 strokes min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 5 min (Kemper and Rosenau, 1986).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Properties of the soil used in the experiment (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil properties</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Values</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Soil properties</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Values</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sand (2–0.05 mm; %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Field capacity (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Silt (0.05–0.002 mm; %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wilting point (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clay (&lt; 0.002 mm; %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aggregate stability (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Textural class</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bulk density (g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">479 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total N (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbonates (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Properties of the SMC.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Properties</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SMC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC (H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5390</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organic matter (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">66.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Effects of different rates of SMC application on aggregate stability
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD &lt; 0.05). Means followed by the same letter are
not statistically different as determined by a least significant difference test.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Data collected were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test
to assess differences in the studied parameters among the treatments: aggregate stability,
modulus of rupture, EC, organic C, and total N. Means were
compared at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05 using the Fisher's LSD significant difference test
(Minitab, 1991, State College, PA, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>Some of the physical and chemical properties of soil and SMC are
shown in Tables 1 and 2. The soil was characterized as having a clay
texture, an alkaline soil pH (7.96), and organic C and CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents of
1.35 and 11.58  %, respectively.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Aggregate stability (AS)</title>
      <p>The effects of SMC application on aggregate stability are shown in Fig. 2.
Aggregate stability decreased after 42 and 62 days of incubation in all SMC
rates when compared to a 21-day incubation period. The effects of SMC
application on soil aggregate stability values were significant. These
results may be explained by the decomposition of soil organic matter
(Carrizo et al., 2015; Şeker, 2003). Aggregate stability and soil organic
matter are two parameters and indicators for soil quality or productivity.
The recovery in aggregate stability of such physically degraded soils is
important, as those studied were expected to follow the incorporation of any
cementing agent, such as SMC (Curtin and Mullen, 2007). Soil organic matter
has been suggested to be the most important factor in the determination of
soil aggregate stability because of the significant positive relationships
between these two parameters (Aksakal et al., 2015; Candemir and Gülser,
2010; Cerdà, 1998). Thus, the application of organic materials has been
proposed to improve the physical properties of degraded soils (Turgut and Kose,
2016). Similar studies have reported an increase in the soil organic carbon
concentration after organic matter application and thus a higher formation
of stable aggregates (Díaz et al., 1994; Cerdà, 1998; Aggelides
and Londra, 2000; Celik et al., 2004; Arthur et al., 2011; Ferreras et al.,
2006; Gümüs and Şeker, 2015; Murphy, 2001).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Effects of different rates of SMC application on soil modulus of
rupture (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD &lt; 0.05). Means followed by the same
letter are not statistically different as determined by a least significant difference test.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Soil modulus of rupture</title>
      <p>The effects of SMC application on the soil modulus of rupture are shown in
Fig. 3. All the SMC applications resulted in a significantly lower soil
modulus of rupture after the 21st and 42nd days compared to the 62-day
incubation. In general, the soil modulus of rupture decreased as the
application rates of SMC increased. These effects can be explained by the
high organic matter contents of SMC that improved soil structure
mechanically (Gümüs and Şeker, 2015; Şeker, 2003), as the SMC
used in the study contains significant amounts of organic substances. The
modulus of rupture can also be related to the inhibitory effects of SMC on
the tight unity formation of soil particles. The structural stabilization is
related to organic matter inputs (Caravaca et al., 2002; Ferreras et al.,
2006), and thus a significant decrease in the modulus of rupture was
possibly attained with the application of SMC. Organic amendments are known
to decrease bulk density and particle density in soil (Moreno et al., 2016).
The absence of such effects after 62 days can be related to the decrease in
aggregate stability and organic substances. This most probably resulted
from the breakdown of soil aggregation and the aggregates of soil organic
matter by mixing pot contents to simulate repeated cultivation (Carrizo et
al., 2015; Şeker, 2003).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Electrical conductivity (EC)</title>
      <p>The effects of SMC on the EC values of the soil are shown in Fig. 4. The EC
values significantly increased with SMC and incubation periods, which may be
explained by the high content of solutes in the nutrient composition of organic
fragments and the remains from the materials during incubation periods
(Yilmaz, 2010). EC can serve as a measure of the presence of nutrients for
both cations and anions (Roy and Kashem, 2014). Soil EC indicates the
mineralization of organic matter in soil and many authors have found
positive correlations between EC and compounds from organic matter
degradation in soil (Arthur et al., 2012; Gulser et al., 2010; Medina et
al., 2012). However, in our study, EC values were still below the upper
limit of 4000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm suggested for agricultural soils, even at
8 % application rates (Arthur et al., 2012; Postel and Starke, 1990;
Rhoades et al., 1992).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Effects of different rates of SMC application on soil EC
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD &lt; 0.05). Means followed by the same letter are
not statistically different as determined by a least significant difference test.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Soil organic carbon (SOC)</title>
      <p>The effects of SMC on the SOC values of the soil are shown in Fig. 5. SOC
significantly increased with elevated SMC rates of application. Our results
revealed SOC increments in response to the increase in SMC doses, and
the strongest effects were obtained with doses of 4 and 8 %. In
general, SOC content values increase with larger amendment rates of organic
materials. SOC is known to play important roles in the maintenance and
improvement of many soil properties, and thus its concentration is often
cited as one of the major indicators for sustaining soil productivity.
Increases in soil organic carbon contents can be achieved by adding spent
mushroom compost (Courtney and Mullen, 2008; Medina et al.,
2012). The continuous decomposition of organic matter in the cultivated soils of
arid and semiarid regions may lead to soil degradation with a consequent
inability to ensure sustainable production (Aggelides and Londra, 2000).
Organic amendments used in soil reclamation emanate from a variety of
sources, including agriculture, forestry, and urban areas. Of those
generated by agriculture, livestock manure from various species is the most
prevalent (Larney and Angers, 2012). Other amendments derived from
agriculture include crop residues and SMC. The rate of decomposition of
organic amendments and SOC remains in the long term varies with the
intrinsic quality of the amendment (Lashermes et al., 2009; Novara et al.,
2015). Soil organic matter content is one of the most important soil quality
indicators of soil recovery (Mahmoud and Abd El-Kader, 2015;
Parras-Alcántara et al., 2015; Pulido Moncada et al., 2015) and is a
good sign for soil quality (Gelaw et al., 2015). The quality of soil organic
matter, soil structure, microbial activity, and rainfall intensity
are, in fact, important parameters that should be evaluated and correlated
to assess the fate of carbon during transportation (Novara et al., 2016).
Similar results were reported by other studies (Arthur et al., 2011; Curtin
and Mullen, 2007; Yazdanpanah et al., 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Effects of different rates of SMC application on soil organic carbon
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD &lt; 0.05). Means followed by the same letter are
not statistically different as determined by a least significant difference test.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Total nitrogen (N)</title>
      <p>The effects of SMC on the total nitrogen values of the soil are shown in Fig. 6.
The nitrogen content of the soil was closely dependent on the amendment
rates of the SMC and, in general, the total nitrogen content of soil
increased with increasing rates of SMC. The strongest effect was obtained
with doses of 4 and 8 %. The degradation of soil and the associated losses
of nitrogen can cause environmental problems and a reduction in soil
fertility (García-Díaz et al., 2016,
2017). With regards to the nitrogen dynamics in the soil, the addition of
the SMC produced a general increase in the organic N concentration
throughout the experiment, especially in comparison to the control soil
(Medina et al., 2012). It has been reported that the physical, chemical, and
biological properties of SMC (especially the C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N mineralization level and
decomposition) may play roles in the mineralization of nitrogen from organic
materials during incubation periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Effects of different rates of SMC application on total nitrogen
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD &lt; 0.05). Means followed by the same letter are
not statistically different as determined by a least significant difference test.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/8/1153/2017/se-8-1153-2017-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study shows that the application of SMC can improve the structure of
soils. In this study, the physical and chemical properties of the soil, such as
aggregate stability, soil modulus of rupture, organic carbon, and total
nitrogen, were improved by spent mushroom compost amendment. The addition of
spent mushroom compost increased soil EC. Soil aggregate stability and
the modulus of rupture were the most significantly affected parameters by SMC
application. Moreover, the use of spent mushroom compost contributed to
enhancing the level of organic carbon and nitrogen in the soil. In summary,
the results of this study showed that SMC application is an effective
way to improve soil physicochemical properties. This structural improvement
can have direct benefits for farmers, land managers, and mushroom
growers who require a safe disposal method for waste products.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data are not publicly available due to copyright issues.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank Ali Sabır from the Department of
Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Selçuk for her
helpful comments and Hamza Negiş from the Department of Soil Science and Plant
Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Selçuk for the helpful
laboratory analysis. They would also like to thank the editors and referees
for their interest and contributions.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Miriam Muñoz-Rojas<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Gökhan Çayci and seven anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aggelides, S. M. and Londra, P. A.: Effects of compost produced from town wastes
and sewage sludge on
the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil, Bioresource Technol.,
71, 253–259, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aksakal, E. L., Sari, S., and Angin, I.: Effects of vermicompost application
on soil aggregation and certain physical properties, Land Degrad. Dev., 27, 983–986, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Annabi, M., Le Bissonnais, Y., Le Villio-Poitrenaud, M., and Houot, S.:
Improvement of soil aggregate stability by repeated applications of organic
amendments to a cultivated silty loam soil, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 144, 382–389, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arthur, E., Cornelis, W., Vermang, J., and De Rocker, E.: Amending a loamy
sand with three compost types: impact on soil quality, Soil Use Manage., 27, 116–123, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arthur, E., Cornelis, W., and Razzaghi, F.: Compost Amendment to sandy soil
affects soil properties and greenhouse tomato productivity, Compost Sci. Util., 20, 215–221, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bal, L., Şeker, C., and Ersoy Gümüş, İ.: Kaymak
TabakasıOluşumuna Fiziko-Kimyasal Faktörlerin Etkileri, Selçuk tarim ve gida bi̇li̇mleri̇ dergi̇si̇, 25, 96–103, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bone, J., Barraclough, D., Eggleton, P., Head, M., Jones, D., and
Voulvoulis, N.: Prioritising soil quality assessment through the screening
of sites: the use of publicly collected data, Land Degrad. Dev., 25, 251–266, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bronick, C. J. and Lal, R.: Soil structure and management: a review,
Geoderma, 124, 3–22, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Calleja-Cervantesa, M. E., Fernández-Gonzálezb, A. J., Irigoyenc, I.,
Fernández-Lópezb, M., Aparicio-Tejod, P. M., and Menéndeze, S.:
Thirteen years of continued application of composted organic wastes in a
vineyard modify soil quality characteristics, Soil Biol. Biochem.,
90, 241–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Candemir, F. and Gülser, C.: Effects of different agricultural wastes on
some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 42, 13–28, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Caravaca, F., Masciandaro, G., and Ceccanti, B.: Land use in relation to
soil chemical and biochemical properties in a semiarid Mediterranean
environment, Soil Till. Res., 68, 23–30, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Carrizo, M. E., Alesso, C. A., Cosentino, D., and Imhoff, S.: Aggregation
agents and structural stability in soils with different texture and organic
carbon contents, Sci. Agr., 72, 75–82, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cassel, D. and Nielsen, D.: Field capacity and available water capacity,
Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 – Physical and Mineralogical Methods,
901–926, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Celik,I., Ortas, I., and Kilic, S.: Effects of compost, mycorrhiza, manure and
fertilizer on some physical properties of a Chromoxerert soil, Soil Till. Res., 78, 59–67, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cerdà, A.: Soil aggregate stability under different Mediterranean
vegetation types, Catena, 32, 73–86, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, K., Heenan, D., and So, H.: Sequestration of carbon and changes in
soil quality under conservation tillage on light-textured soils in
Australia: a review, Anim. Prod. Sci., 43, 325–334, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Courtney, R. and Mullen, G.: Soil quality and barley growth as influenced by
the land application of two compost types, Bioresource Technol., 99,
2913–2918, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Curtin, J. and Mullen, G.: Physical properties of some intensively
cultivated soils of Ireland amended with spent mushroom compost, Land Degrad. Dev., 18, 355–368, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Dai, Q., Liu, Z., Shao, H., and Yang, Z.: Karst bare slope soil erosion and soil
quality: a simulation case study, Solid Earth, 6, 985–995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-985-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-6-985-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Diaz, E., Roldfin, A., Lax, A., and Albaladejo, J.:
Formation of stable aggregates in degraded soil by amendment with urban
refuse and peat, Geoderma, 63, 277–288, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Doran, J., Safley, M., Pankhurst, C., Doube, B., and Gupta, V.: Defining and
assessing soil health and sustainable productivity, Biological indicators of
soil health, 1–28, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Erler, F. and Polat, E.: Mushroom cultivation in Turkey as related to pest
and pathogen management, Isr. J. Plant Sci., 56, 303–308,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ferreras, L., Gómez, E., Toresani, S., Firpo, I., and Rotondo, R.:
Effect of organic amendments on some physical, chemical and biological
properties in a horticultural soil, Bioresource Technol., 97, 635–640,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
García-Díaz, A., Allas, R. B., Gristina, L., Cerdà, A.,
Pereira, P., and Novara, A.: Carbon input threshold for soil carbon budget
optimization in eroding vineyards, Geoderma, 271, 144–149, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
García-Díaz, A., Bienes, R., Sastre, B., Novara, A., Gristina, L.,
and Cerdà, A.: Nitrogen losses in vineyards under different types of
soil groundcover. A field runoff simulator approach in central Spain,
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 236, 256–267, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gee, G. W., Bauder, J. W., and Klute, A.: Particle-size analysis, Methods of
soil analysis. Part 1, Physical and mineralogical methods, 383–411, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gelaw, A. M., Singh, B., and Lal, R.: Organic carbon and nitrogen associated
with soil aggregates and particle sizes under different land uses in Tigray,
Northern Ethiopia, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 690–700, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Grandy, A. S., Porter, G. A., and Erich, M. S.: Organic amendment and
rotation crop effects on the recovery of soil organic matter and aggregation
in potato cropping systems, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66,
1311–1319, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gulser, C., Demir, Z., and Ic, S.: Changes in some soil properties at
different incubation periods after tobacco waste application, J. Environ. Biol., 31, 671–674, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Gümüs, I. and Şeker, C.:  Influence of humic acid applications on modulus of rupture, aggregate stability, electrical
conductivity, carbon and nitrogen content of a crusting problem soil, Solid Earth, 6, 1231–1236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-1231-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-6-1231-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hueso-González, P., Martínez-Murillo, J. F., and Ruiz-Sinoga, J.
D.: The impact of organic amendments on forest soil properties under
Mediterranean climatic conditions, Land Degrad. Dev., 25,
604–612, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jaiarree, S., Chidthaisong, A., Tangtham, N., Polprasert, C., Sarobol, E.,
and Tyler, S.: Carbon budget and sequestration potential in a sandy soil
treated with compost, Land Degrad. Dev., 25, 120–129, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Karlen, D., Mausbach, M., Doran, J., Cline, R., Harris, R., and Schuman, G.:
Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest
editorial), Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 4–10, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kemper, W. and Rosenau, R.: Aggregate stability and size distribution,
in: Methods of Soil analysis, Part 1,  2nd Edn., edited by:  Klute, A., Agron. Monogr.
No. 9, Am. Soc. Agron.: Madison, Wis, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ko, H. G., Park, S. H., Kim, S. H., Park, H. G., and Park, W. M.: Detection
and recovery of hydrolytic enzymes from spent compost of four mushroom
species, Folia Microbiol., 50, 103–106, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Larney, F. J. and Angers, D. A.: The role of organic amendments in soil
reclamation: a review, Can. J. Soil Sci., 92, 19–38, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lashermes, G., Nicolardot, B., Parnaudeau, V., Thuries, L., Chaussod, R.,
Guillotin, M., Lineres, M., Mary, B., Metzger, L., and Morvan, T.: Indicator
of potential residual carbon in soils after exogenous organic matter
application, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 60, 297–310, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
LECO Cooperation:  Truspec carbon/nitrogen determinator, Leco Cooperation 3000, Lakeview Avenue St Joseph, M149085-2396,
USA, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mahmoud, E. and Abd El-Kader, N.: Heavy metal immobilization in contaminated
soils using phosphogypsum and rice straw compost, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 819–824, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Medina, E., Paredes, C., Bustamante, M., Moral, R., and Moreno-Caselles, J.:
Relationships between soil physico-chemical, chemical and biological
properties in a soil amended with spent mushroom substrate, Geoderma, 173,
152–161, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
MGM: Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü Resmi İstatistikler
(İllerimize Ait İstatistiki Veriler), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Minitab: Minitab reference manual (Release 7.1), State Coll., PA16801,
USA, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Moreno, M. T., Carmona, E., Santiago, A., Ordovás, J., and Delgado, A.:
Olive husk compost improves the quality of intensively cultivated
agricultural soils, Land Degrad. Dev., 27, 449–459, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Mukherjee, A., Zimmerman, A. R., Hamdan, R., and Cooper, W. T.: Physicochemical changes in pyrogenic organic matter
(biochar) after 15 months of field aging, Solid Earth, 5, 693–704, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-693-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-5-693-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, C.: Spent mushroom compost as an amendment on tillage land, MS,
University of Limerick, Ireland, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Novara, A., Rühl, J., La Mantia, T., Gristina, L., La Bella, S., and Tuttolomondo, T.: Litter contribution to soil organic carbon
in the processes of agriculture abandon, Solid Earth, 6, 425–432, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-425-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-6-425-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Novara, A., Keesstra, S., Cerdà, A., Pereira, P., and Gristina, L.:
Understanding the role of soil erosion on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-C loss using 13 C
isotopic signatures in abandoned Mediterranean agricultural land, Sci.
Total Environ., 550, 330–336,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.095</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Özdemir, N., Uzun, S., and Yakupoglu, T.: The effect of the rates of
different organic fertilizers on restoring aggregate stability and
productivity of eroded soils, Biol. Agric. Hortic., 25,
175–184, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Parras-Alcántara, L., Lozano-García, B., and Galán-Espejo, A.: Soil organic carbon along an altitudinal gradient
in the Despeñaperros Natural Park, southern Spain, Solid Earth, 6, 125–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-125-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-6-125-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Paz-Ferreiro, J. and Fu, S.: Biological indices for soil quality evaluation:
perspectives and limitations, Land Degrad. Dev., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2262" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ldr.2262</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Peng, F., Quangang, Y., Xue, X., Guo, J., and Wang, T.: Effects of rodent-induced land degradation on ecosystem carbon fluxes in an
alpine meadow in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China, Solid Earth, 6, 303–310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-303-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-6-303-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Postel, S. and Starke, L.: Saving water for agriculture, State of the
World,  39–58, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pulido Moncada, M., Gabriels, D., Cornelis, W., and Lobo, D.: Comparing
aggregate stability tests for soil physical quality indicators, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 843–852, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Reeve, R.: Modulus of rupture, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical
and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and
Sampling,  466–471, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rhoades, J., Sparks, D., Page, A., Helmke, P., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P.,
Tabatabai, M., Johnston, C., and Sumner, M.: Salinity: Electrical
conductivity and total dissolved solids, Methods of soil analysis. Part
3-chemical methods, 417–435, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Rhoades, J. D., Kandiah, A., and Mashali, A. M.: The use of saline waters
for crop production, FAO Rome, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Richards, L.: Modulus of rupture as an index of crusting of soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 17, 321–323, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rodrigo Comino, J., Ruiz Sinoga, J. D., Senciales Gonzàles, J. M.,
Guerra-Merchàn, A., Seeger, M., and Ries, J. B.: High variability of soil
erosion and hydrological processes in Mediterranean hillslope vineyards
(Montes de Málaga, Spain), Catena, 145, 274–284.
doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.012, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Rodrigo Comino, J., Senciales, Gonzjles, J. M., Ramos, M. C.,
Martínez-Casasnovas, J. A., Lasanta, T., Brevik, E. C., and Ruiz Sinoga,
J. D.: Understanding soil erosion processes in Mediterranean sloping
vineyards (Montes de Málaga, Spain), Geoderma, 296, 47–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.021</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Roy, S. and Kashem, M. A.: Effects of Organic Manures in Changes of Some
Soil Properties at Different Incubation Periods, Open Journal of Soil
Science, 4, 81–86, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Şeker, C.: Effects of selected amendments on soil properties and
emergence of wheat seedlings, Canadian J. Soil sci., 83, 615–621,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Şeker, C. and Karakaplan, S.: Konya ovasında toprak özellikleri
ile kırılma değerleri arasındaki ilişkiler, Tr. J.
Agriculture and Forestry, 29, 183–190, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Soil Survey Staff: Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Shiralipour, A., McConnell, D. B., and Smith, W. H.: Physical and chemical
properties of soils as affected by municipal solid waste compost
application, Biomass Bioenerg., 3, 261–266, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, G.: Soil pH and soil acidity, in: Methods of soil analysis, Part 3.,
Chemical methods, edited by:  Sparks, D. L.,   Soil Science Society of
America: Madison, WI, 475–490, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Tui̇k, T. İ. Ö.: Statistics on plant products 2009–2015, Turkish Statistics Institute, <uri>http://www.tuik.gov.tr</uri>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Turgut, B. and Kose, B.: Improvements in aggregate stability of sediments
supplemented with tea waste and farmyard manure, Spanish Journal of Soil
Science, 6, 98–106, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Uzun, I.: Use of spent mushroom compost in sustainable fruit production,
Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12, 157–165, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Wu, Y., Xu, G., and Shao, H. B.: Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil,
Solid Earth, 5, 665–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-665-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-5-665-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Yazdanpanah, N., Mahmoodabadi, M., and Cerdà, A.: The impact of organic
amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in
semiarid lands, Geoderma, 266, 58–65, 2016.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Yilmaz, E.: Changes of some soil properties by agricultural processing waste
(soybean pulp) amendment, Journal of Food, Agr. Environ., 8,
1057–1060, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Y. and Jia, Z. Q.: Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen capacities of Salix cheilophila Schneid along a revegetation
chronosequence in semi-arid degraded sandy land of the Gonghe Basin, Tibet Plateau, Solid Earth, 5, 1045–1054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-1045-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-5-1045-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L. and Sun, X.: Changes in physical, chemical, and microbiological
properties during the two-stage co-composting of green waste with spent
mushroom compost and biochar, Bioresource Technol., 171, 274–284, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effects of spent mushroom compost application on the physicochemical properties of a degraded soil</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Under field and laboratory conditions, the application of organic amendments
has generally shown an improvement in soil physicochemical properties. Here,
spent mushroom compost (SMC) is proposed as a suitable organic amendment for
soil structure restoration. Our study assessed the impact of SMC on the
physicochemical properties of a weak-structured and physically degraded soil.
The approach involved the establishment of a pot experiment with SMC
applications into soil (control, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 %).
Soils were incubated at field capacity (−33 kPa) for 21, 42, and 62 days
under laboratory conditions. SMC applications into the soil significantly
increased the aggregate stability (AS) and decreased the modulus of rupture.
The application of SMC at rates of 1, 2, 4, and 8 %
significantly increased the total nitrogen and soil organic carbon contents of
the degraded soil at all incubation periods (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The results
obtained in this study indicate that the application of SMC can improve soil
physicochemical properties, which may benefit farmers, land managers, and
mushroom growers.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aggelides, S. M. and Londra, P. A.: Effects of compost produced from town wastes
and sewage sludge on
the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil, Bioresource Technol.,
71, 253–259, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aksakal, E. L., Sari, S., and Angin, I.: Effects of vermicompost application
on soil aggregation and certain physical properties, Land Degrad. Dev., 27, 983–986, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Annabi, M., Le Bissonnais, Y., Le Villio-Poitrenaud, M., and Houot, S.:
Improvement of soil aggregate stability by repeated applications of organic
amendments to a cultivated silty loam soil, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 144, 382–389, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arthur, E., Cornelis, W., Vermang, J., and De Rocker, E.: Amending a loamy
sand with three compost types: impact on soil quality, Soil Use Manage., 27, 116–123, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arthur, E., Cornelis, W., and Razzaghi, F.: Compost Amendment to sandy soil
affects soil properties and greenhouse tomato productivity, Compost Sci. Util., 20, 215–221, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bal, L., Şeker, C., and Ersoy Gümüş, İ.: Kaymak
TabakasıOluşumuna Fiziko-Kimyasal Faktörlerin Etkileri, Selçuk tarim ve gida bi̇li̇mleri̇ dergi̇si̇, 25, 96–103, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bone, J., Barraclough, D., Eggleton, P., Head, M., Jones, D., and
Voulvoulis, N.: Prioritising soil quality assessment through the screening
of sites: the use of publicly collected data, Land Degrad. Dev., 25, 251–266, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bronick, C. J. and Lal, R.: Soil structure and management: a review,
Geoderma, 124, 3–22, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Calleja-Cervantesa, M. E., Fernández-Gonzálezb, A. J., Irigoyenc, I.,
Fernández-Lópezb, M., Aparicio-Tejod, P. M., and Menéndeze, S.:
Thirteen years of continued application of composted organic wastes in a
vineyard modify soil quality characteristics, Soil Biol. Biochem.,
90, 241–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Candemir, F. and Gülser, C.: Effects of different agricultural wastes on
some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 42, 13–28, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Caravaca, F., Masciandaro, G., and Ceccanti, B.: Land use in relation to
soil chemical and biochemical properties in a semiarid Mediterranean
environment, Soil Till. Res., 68, 23–30, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Carrizo, M. E., Alesso, C. A., Cosentino, D., and Imhoff, S.: Aggregation
agents and structural stability in soils with different texture and organic
carbon contents, Sci. Agr., 72, 75–82, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cassel, D. and Nielsen, D.: Field capacity and available water capacity,
Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 – Physical and Mineralogical Methods,
901–926, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Celik,I., Ortas, I., and Kilic, S.: Effects of compost, mycorrhiza, manure and
fertilizer on some physical properties of a Chromoxerert soil, Soil Till. Res., 78, 59–67, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cerdà, A.: Soil aggregate stability under different Mediterranean
vegetation types, Catena, 32, 73–86, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Chan, K., Heenan, D., and So, H.: Sequestration of carbon and changes in
soil quality under conservation tillage on light-textured soils in
Australia: a review, Anim. Prod. Sci., 43, 325–334, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Courtney, R. and Mullen, G.: Soil quality and barley growth as influenced by
the land application of two compost types, Bioresource Technol., 99,
2913–2918, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Curtin, J. and Mullen, G.: Physical properties of some intensively
cultivated soils of Ireland amended with spent mushroom compost, Land Degrad. Dev., 18, 355–368, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, Q., Liu, Z., Shao, H., and Yang, Z.: Karst bare slope soil erosion and soil
quality: a simulation case study, Solid Earth, 6, 985–995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-985-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-985-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Diaz, E., Roldfin, A., Lax, A., and Albaladejo, J.:
Formation of stable aggregates in degraded soil by amendment with urban
refuse and peat, Geoderma, 63, 277–288, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Doran, J., Safley, M., Pankhurst, C., Doube, B., and Gupta, V.: Defining and
assessing soil health and sustainable productivity, Biological indicators of
soil health, 1–28, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Erler, F. and Polat, E.: Mushroom cultivation in Turkey as related to pest
and pathogen management, Isr. J. Plant Sci., 56, 303–308,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ferreras, L., Gómez, E., Toresani, S., Firpo, I., and Rotondo, R.:
Effect of organic amendments on some physical, chemical and biological
properties in a horticultural soil, Bioresource Technol., 97, 635–640,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
García-Díaz, A., Allas, R. B., Gristina, L., Cerdà, A.,
Pereira, P., and Novara, A.: Carbon input threshold for soil carbon budget
optimization in eroding vineyards, Geoderma, 271, 144–149, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
García-Díaz, A., Bienes, R., Sastre, B., Novara, A., Gristina, L.,
and Cerdà, A.: Nitrogen losses in vineyards under different types of
soil groundcover. A field runoff simulator approach in central Spain,
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 236, 256–267, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gee, G. W., Bauder, J. W., and Klute, A.: Particle-size analysis, Methods of
soil analysis. Part 1, Physical and mineralogical methods, 383–411, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gelaw, A. M., Singh, B., and Lal, R.: Organic carbon and nitrogen associated
with soil aggregates and particle sizes under different land uses in Tigray,
Northern Ethiopia, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 690–700, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Grandy, A. S., Porter, G. A., and Erich, M. S.: Organic amendment and
rotation crop effects on the recovery of soil organic matter and aggregation
in potato cropping systems, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66,
1311–1319, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gulser, C., Demir, Z., and Ic, S.: Changes in some soil properties at
different incubation periods after tobacco waste application, J. Environ. Biol., 31, 671–674, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Gümüs, I. and Şeker, C.:  Influence of humic acid applications on modulus of rupture, aggregate stability, electrical
conductivity, carbon and nitrogen content of a crusting problem soil, Solid Earth, 6, 1231–1236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-1231-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-1231-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hueso-González, P., Martínez-Murillo, J. F., and Ruiz-Sinoga, J.
D.: The impact of organic amendments on forest soil properties under
Mediterranean climatic conditions, Land Degrad. Dev., 25,
604–612, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jaiarree, S., Chidthaisong, A., Tangtham, N., Polprasert, C., Sarobol, E.,
and Tyler, S.: Carbon budget and sequestration potential in a sandy soil
treated with compost, Land Degrad. Dev., 25, 120–129, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Karlen, D., Mausbach, M., Doran, J., Cline, R., Harris, R., and Schuman, G.:
Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest
editorial), Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 4–10, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kemper, W. and Rosenau, R.: Aggregate stability and size distribution,
in: Methods of Soil analysis, Part 1,  2nd Edn., edited by:  Klute, A., Agron. Monogr.
No. 9, Am. Soc. Agron.: Madison, Wis, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ko, H. G., Park, S. H., Kim, S. H., Park, H. G., and Park, W. M.: Detection
and recovery of hydrolytic enzymes from spent compost of four mushroom
species, Folia Microbiol., 50, 103–106, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Larney, F. J. and Angers, D. A.: The role of organic amendments in soil
reclamation: a review, Can. J. Soil Sci., 92, 19–38, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Lashermes, G., Nicolardot, B., Parnaudeau, V., Thuries, L., Chaussod, R.,
Guillotin, M., Lineres, M., Mary, B., Metzger, L., and Morvan, T.: Indicator
of potential residual carbon in soils after exogenous organic matter
application, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 60, 297–310, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
LECO Cooperation:  Truspec carbon/nitrogen determinator, Leco Cooperation 3000, Lakeview Avenue St Joseph, M149085-2396,
USA, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mahmoud, E. and Abd El-Kader, N.: Heavy metal immobilization in contaminated
soils using phosphogypsum and rice straw compost, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 819–824, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Medina, E., Paredes, C., Bustamante, M., Moral, R., and Moreno-Caselles, J.:
Relationships between soil physico-chemical, chemical and biological
properties in a soil amended with spent mushroom substrate, Geoderma, 173,
152–161, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
MGM: Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü Resmi İstatistikler
(İllerimize Ait İstatistiki Veriler), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Minitab: Minitab reference manual (Release 7.1), State Coll., PA16801,
USA, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Moreno, M. T., Carmona, E., Santiago, A., Ordovás, J., and Delgado, A.:
Olive husk compost improves the quality of intensively cultivated
agricultural soils, Land Degrad. Dev., 27, 449–459, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mukherjee, A., Zimmerman, A. R., Hamdan, R., and Cooper, W. T.: Physicochemical changes in pyrogenic organic matter
(biochar) after 15 months of field aging, Solid Earth, 5, 693–704, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-693-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-693-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, C.: Spent mushroom compost as an amendment on tillage land, MS,
University of Limerick, Ireland, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Novara, A., Rühl, J., La Mantia, T., Gristina, L., La Bella, S., and Tuttolomondo, T.: Litter contribution to soil organic carbon
in the processes of agriculture abandon, Solid Earth, 6, 425–432, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-425-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-425-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Novara, A., Keesstra, S., Cerdà, A., Pereira, P., and Gristina, L.:
Understanding the role of soil erosion on CO<sub>2</sub>-C loss using 13 C
isotopic signatures in abandoned Mediterranean agricultural land, Sci.
Total Environ., 550, 330–336,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.095</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Özdemir, N., Uzun, S., and Yakupoglu, T.: The effect of the rates of
different organic fertilizers on restoring aggregate stability and
productivity of eroded soils, Biol. Agric. Hortic., 25,
175–184, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Parras-Alcántara, L., Lozano-García, B., and Galán-Espejo, A.: Soil organic carbon along an altitudinal gradient
in the Despeñaperros Natural Park, southern Spain, Solid Earth, 6, 125–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-125-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-125-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Paz-Ferreiro, J. and Fu, S.: Biological indices for soil quality evaluation:
perspectives and limitations, Land Degrad. Dev., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2262" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2262</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, F., Quangang, Y., Xue, X., Guo, J., and Wang, T.: Effects of rodent-induced land degradation on ecosystem carbon fluxes in an
alpine meadow in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China, Solid Earth, 6, 303–310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-303-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-303-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Postel, S. and Starke, L.: Saving water for agriculture, State of the
World,  39–58, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Pulido Moncada, M., Gabriels, D., Cornelis, W., and Lobo, D.: Comparing
aggregate stability tests for soil physical quality indicators, Land Degrad. Dev., 26, 843–852, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Reeve, R.: Modulus of rupture, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical
and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and
Sampling,  466–471, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rhoades, J., Sparks, D., Page, A., Helmke, P., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P.,
Tabatabai, M., Johnston, C., and Sumner, M.: Salinity: Electrical
conductivity and total dissolved solids, Methods of soil analysis. Part
3-chemical methods, 417–435, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Rhoades, J. D., Kandiah, A., and Mashali, A. M.: The use of saline waters
for crop production, FAO Rome, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Richards, L.: Modulus of rupture as an index of crusting of soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 17, 321–323, 1953.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rodrigo Comino, J., Ruiz Sinoga, J. D., Senciales Gonzàles, J. M.,
Guerra-Merchàn, A., Seeger, M., and Ries, J. B.: High variability of soil
erosion and hydrological processes in Mediterranean hillslope vineyards
(Montes de Málaga, Spain), Catena, 145, 274–284.
doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.012, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Rodrigo Comino, J., Senciales, Gonzjles, J. M., Ramos, M. C.,
Martínez-Casasnovas, J. A., Lasanta, T., Brevik, E. C., and Ruiz Sinoga,
J. D.: Understanding soil erosion processes in Mediterranean sloping
vineyards (Montes de Málaga, Spain), Geoderma, 296, 47–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.021</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Roy, S. and Kashem, M. A.: Effects of Organic Manures in Changes of Some
Soil Properties at Different Incubation Periods, Open Journal of Soil
Science, 4, 81–86, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Şeker, C.: Effects of selected amendments on soil properties and
emergence of wheat seedlings, Canadian J. Soil sci., 83, 615–621,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Şeker, C. and Karakaplan, S.: Konya ovasında toprak özellikleri
ile kırılma değerleri arasındaki ilişkiler, Tr. J.
Agriculture and Forestry, 29, 183–190, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Soil Survey Staff: Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Shiralipour, A., McConnell, D. B., and Smith, W. H.: Physical and chemical
properties of soils as affected by municipal solid waste compost
application, Biomass Bioenerg., 3, 261–266, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, G.: Soil pH and soil acidity, in: Methods of soil analysis, Part 3.,
Chemical methods, edited by:  Sparks, D. L.,   Soil Science Society of
America: Madison, WI, 475–490, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tui̇k, T. İ. Ö.: Statistics on plant products 2009–2015, Turkish Statistics Institute, <a href="http://www.tuik.gov.tr" target="_blank">http://www.tuik.gov.tr</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Turgut, B. and Kose, B.: Improvements in aggregate stability of sediments
supplemented with tea waste and farmyard manure, Spanish Journal of Soil
Science, 6, 98–106, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Uzun, I.: Use of spent mushroom compost in sustainable fruit production,
Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12, 157–165, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y., Xu, G., and Shao, H. B.: Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil,
Solid Earth, 5, 665–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-665-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-665-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Yazdanpanah, N., Mahmoodabadi, M., and Cerdà, A.: The impact of organic
amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in
semiarid lands, Geoderma, 266, 58–65, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Yilmaz, E.: Changes of some soil properties by agricultural processing waste
(soybean pulp) amendment, Journal of Food, Agr. Environ., 8,
1057–1060, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, Y. and Jia, Z. Q.: Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen capacities of Salix cheilophila Schneid along a revegetation
chronosequence in semi-arid degraded sandy land of the Gonghe Basin, Tibet Plateau, Solid Earth, 5, 1045–1054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-1045-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-1045-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L. and Sun, X.: Changes in physical, chemical, and microbiological
properties during the two-stage co-composting of green waste with spent
mushroom compost and biochar, Bioresource Technol., 171, 274–284, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
