<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-9-683-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{0.4cm}}?>Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a ductile–brittle fault zone in crystalline rock</article-title><alt-title>Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a ductile–brittle fault</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a ductile--brittle fault}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Q. C. Wenning et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wenning</surname><given-names>Quinn C.</given-names></name>
          <email>quinn.wenning@erdw.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-6295</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Madonna</surname><given-names>Claudio</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>de Haller</surname><given-names>Antoine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Burg</surname><given-names>Jean-Pierre</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-4729</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Quinn C. Wenning (quinn.wenning@erdw.ethz.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>683</fpage><lpage>698</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>5</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e114">This study characterizes the elastic and fluid flow properties systematically
across a ductile–brittle fault zone in crystalline rock at the Grimsel Test
Site underground research laboratory. Anisotropic seismic velocities and
permeability measured every 0.1 m in the 0.7 m across the transition zone
from the host Grimsel granodiorite to the mylonitic core show that
foliation-parallel P- and S-wave velocities systematically
increase from the host rock towards the mylonitic core, while permeability is
reduced nearest to the mylonitic core. The results suggest that although
brittle deformation has persisted in the recent evolution, antecedent ductile
fabric continues to control the matrix elastic and fluid flow properties
outside the mylonitic core. The juxtaposition of the ductile strain zone next
to the brittle zone, which is bounded inside the two mylonitic cores, causes
a significant elastic, mechanical, and fluid flow heterogeneity, which has
important implications for crustal deformation and fluid flow and for the exploitation and use of geothermal energy and geologic waste storage. The
results illustrate how physical characteristics of faults in crystalline
rocks change in fault zones during the ductile to brittle transitions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e124">Brittle faults and ductile shear zones and their associated damage and high-strain zones have a localized yet influential impact on crustal mechanics and
fluid flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">see reviews by</named-content></xref>. Physical properties
in and around the fault core and damage zone in the brittle regime generally
differ from the host rock by several orders of magnitude, asserting
tremendous influence on fluid flow, deformation, earthquake rupture, and the
development of economically exploitable resources. Less is known about the
nature of the physical properties of ductile shear zones, and their role in
crustal mechanics and fluid flow distribution once they are exhumed
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Thus, understanding the nature of the
geometrical distribution and temporal evolution of the properties associated
with ductile shear zones and their transition into brittle faults and damage
zones is integral to assess crustal mechanics and fluid flow distribution.</p>
      <p id="d1e137">The characterization of brittle faults and damage zones has received much
attention <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">see review by</named-content></xref>. Previous studies from the
laboratory (cm) to field outcrop (km) scale have developed into generalized
models for the mechanical and hydraulic behavior of fault zones
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. These models
suggest that the fault zone consists of single or multiple high-strain cores
surrounded by a damage zone where the physical properties are a function of
the rock matrix, fracture density, and fault core. Brittle faults generally
increase in fracture density in the damage zone towards the fault core
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.5"/>, thereby increasing permeability and
reducing elastic and mechanical strength from the intact rock towards the
central fault core. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.6"/> show that the microfracture density
that enhances permeability around brittle faults scales with the displacement of
the fault. Laboratory experiments on Westerly granite indicate that
increasing<?pagebreak page684?> permeability due to microfracturing occurs regardless of the
tectonic faulting regime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e159">In the ductile deformation regime, shear zones are understood to develop
anisotropic properties due to mineral alignment of anisotropic minerals in
preferred elongation directions (shape-preferred orientation or SPO) and/or
alignment of the crystallographic axis (crystallographic preferred
orientation or CPO) of minerals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.8"/>. The characteristics of
ductile shear zones have been studied in terms of their anisotropic velocity
structure to assess observations in middle to lower crustal seismic
reflectivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">see review by</named-content></xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.10"/> suggested
that the physical properties in ductile shear zones should also be considered
as transitional (i.e., the seismic velocities would grade into the ductile
shear zone core). The strength of ductile shear zones is typically studied in
terms of viscous rheology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. However, these shear
zones are often “frozen in” and preserve their textural features that when
exhumed behave with elastic and frictional failure criteria in the upper
crust. In preserved ductile shear zones, mechanical and fluid flow properties
have typically been studied separately. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.12"/> studied the porosity
and mineral structure across a mylonitic shear zone. Using empirical
relationships between porosity and pore throat diameter, these authors were
able to discern that the permeability decreases in the highest strained
sample. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.13"/> performed triaxial deformation experiments across
the brittle–ductile transition in Westerly granite and show that porosity
changes in the ductile regime is compactant, while the brittle regime is
marked by dilation.</p>
      <p id="d1e185">The models for elasticity and permeability through brittle and ductile shear
zones have been mostly derived from outcrop examples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="post">and references
therein</named-content></xref>. To date, there have been limited systematic mechanical
and fluid flow studies on boreholes that directly penetrate fossil ductile
shear zones. Drilling into fractured crystalline rock for geothermal
exploitation has been ongoing since the 1970s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.15"/>. Recent
drilling through the Alpine Fault in New Zealand revealed how ductile
mylonites have been exhumed, altering the rocks to a typical brittle fault
damage zone in the vicinity to the fault <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.16"/>. Although much
precaution is taken in outcrop studies, core material provides the
opportunity to sample systematically into a fault zone eliminating issues of
surface weathering and processes that may alter physical properties. However,
precaution should be taken when assessing the extent and timing of
hydrothermal alteration associated with faults at depth. Additionally, focus
on the relationship between elasticity, mechanical strength, and permeability
in the transition zone and core of faults has been inherently focused on
brittle structures. However, with the importance of meeting sustainable energy demands via geothermal energy and promoting safe geological waste disposal, the impact of preserved ductile structures in granitic rocks on mechanics and fluid flow are also if increasing significance.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.17"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e203">Recent drilling at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS), an underground research
laboratory owned and operated by NAGRA (National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste) located
in central Switzerland, penetrated a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m thick ductile–brittle
fault damage zone relict in the Grimsel granodiorite host rock
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.18"/>. Alpine tectonism produced multiple stages of ductile and
subsequently brittle deformation in the Grimsel granodiorite, a member of the
Aar massif <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.19"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The
relict shear zone penetrated by the borehole is bounded by two foliated
ductile shear zones, which initially localized ductile deformation and
further reactivated brittlely between the two foliated shear zones. This
study concentrates on characterizing the elastic and fluid flow properties
from the surrounding granodiorite rock mass through the ductile transition
zone into the bounding foliated shear zone. Seismic P- and S-wave velocities
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and gas permeability (<italic>k</italic>) were
measured on core samples in the laboratory. This paper emphasizes that the
mineralogical changes entering the shear zone influence changes in physical
properties near the ductile–brittle damage zone. The results also provide
insight on the transient behavior of faults during the transition from
ductile to brittle regimes through exhumation processes and provide insight
on their effect on economic exploitation of such shear zones in terms of
geothermal energy or geological waste disposal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Geologic setting and core details</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e255"><bold>(a)</bold> Geologic map of the Grimsel pass region
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">after</named-content></xref>; <bold>(b)</bold> borehole orientations
(this study – red borehole) with respect to the underground research
laboratory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">after</named-content></xref>; <bold>(c)</bold> the borehole in
this study depicting the location of the damage zone with coring and stress
measurement locations projected along the borehole. The shear zone at the
base is divided into three components: (1) transition zone (TZ),
(2) mylonitic core (MC), and (3) damage zone (DZ). <bold>(d)</bold> Photograph of
a saw-cut cross section through part of the transition zone and the mylonitic
core (black ellipses show subcored cylinders inclined to the cut surface).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e287">Optical microscopy and
QEMSCAN<sup>®</sup> images of thin sections for each
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample (S7x, S19.5x, S19.7x, S20.0x, and S23.6x). Panel
<bold>(a)</bold> shows the cross-polarized light image of the sample with the
corresponding QEMSCAN<sup>®</sup> area in <bold>(b)</bold>.
Panel <bold>(c)</bold> depicts a particular microstructure of the sample. S7x –
typical host rock texture with twinned feldspar and quartz. S19.5x –
elongated feldspar with quartz in strain shadows between fine-grained mica.
S19.7x – fractured feldspar with quartz grains filling the fracture. S20.0x
– rounded sericitic feldspar clast with fine-grained quartz and mica
infilling the strain shadows between lenses of large mica grains and fine
recrystallized quartz/mica. S23.6x – very fine-grained foliated biotite and
quartz grains surrounding euhedral plagioclase. Sample locations depicted in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e325">The GTS is located in the Aar Massif in central Switzerland
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). The underground laboratory is situated in Grimsel
granodiorite in the Haslital. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.22"/> place the age of the Grimsel
granodiorite at  299 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Ma. From field relations and dating, the
Grimsel granodiorite has the same age as the Central Aar granite. These
intrusions postdate Variscan collision, and there are no identified
pre-Alpine deformation structures.</p>
      <p id="d1e341">Detailed deformation histories of the Grimsel region are available
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.23"/>, which are
summarized here. From argon–argon and rubidium–strontium dating, as well as
field relations, beginning around 21 Ma and continuing until approximately
10 Ma, ductile deformation resulting from transpression created NNE–SSW,
E–W, and NW-SE striking shear zones with steep dips to the south
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a). Ductile deformation is believed to occur in two
stages: (1) NNW-vergent thrusting from 21 to 17 Ma and (2) transpression
causing dextral shearing of preferentially oriented oversteepened stage 1
structures from 14 to 10 Ma. Beginning around 9 Ma steady exhumation caused
retrograde ductile–brittle deformation in the form of discrete<?pagebreak page685?> fractures,
and subsequent embrittlement of these shear zones, which has produced fault
breccias, cataclasites, and fault gouge.</p>
      <p id="d1e349">The Aar granites experienced 300–450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 150 to 250 MPa peak
conditions during Alpine metamorphism
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.24"/>. Our thin section observation
shows fracturing of feldspar and undulose extinction along with subgrain
boundaries in quartz, which are consistent with the inferred metamorphic
temperatures.</p>
      <?pagebreak page687?><p id="d1e364">In 2015, a series of boreholes were drilled in the Grimsel granodiorite
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) for stress measurements, petrophysical property
characterization, and hydraulic stimulation of the shear zones
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.25"/>. The core material used in this study comes from the borehole
drilled from an offset of the main tunnel in the GTS that penetrates two
parallel shear zones. The well was drilled from 480 m below the ground
surface in a subhorizontal trajectory with an azimuth of 319<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
well penetrates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 m of mostly non-fractured granodiorite
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). The granodiorite is foliated and at 20.2 m intersects
a 20 cm thick foliated mylonitic shear zone, also defined as a foliated
mylonitic core (MC). The foliation intensity in the granodiorite decreases
towards the host rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 m from the MC through the transition
zone (TZ) and is concordant with the foliation in the steeply dipping
E–W-oriented MC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.26"/>. The TZ has a gradual decrease in grain
size of both matrix grains and the felsic clasts with more frequent mylonitic
shear bands towards the MC (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The
MC itself is heterogeneously banded with mylonite and ultramylonite layers. A
brittle damage zone (DZ) mixed with small &lt; 5 cm thick mylonitic
shear zones is bounded between the MC at 20.2 m and another 20 cm thick MC
at the end of the borehole (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Less than 1 mm aperture
quartz-filled fractures intersect the MCs originating from within the damage
zone. However, these do not appear to penetrate entirely through the MCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Sample selection, preparation, and characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e418">In order to determine the spatial relationship of the physical properties in
the shear zone a continuous set of samples was cored every 0.1 m in the
transition zone from 19.6 m to the border of the first MC at 20.1 m.
Abundant fractures in the damage zone between the two MCs prevented
continuous coring. Two mutually perpendicular core samples, one parallel
(<italic>x</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and one perpendicular (<italic>x</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the Grimsel
granodiorite foliation were taken to characterize the physical property and
anisotropy changes as a gradient away from the mylonitic core. Sampling
farther than 19.5 m was not possible due to previously made overcoring
stress measurements (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). In order to optimize the number of
samples, the <italic>x</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> direction was taken <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> off
axis from the lineation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d). Foliation perpendicular
samples could not be taken at 19.5 and 20.1 m because of breaks in the core.
The <italic>x</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <italic>x</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were bored out of the core
using a diamond drill bit (2.54 cm inner diameter) with water as the cooling
fluid. The 2.49 to 5.56 cm long samples were ground and polished to craft
parallel ends. To characterize the MC, parallel and perpendicular to
foliation samples were taken at 20.2 and 23.6 m, respectively. There is
a maximum length (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.49 cm) to diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.53 cm) ratio of
approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the MC samples, due to the extremely fissile nature of
these rocks. Additionally, these two samples come from separate but similar
MC at the base of the borehole due to limited sample material. Since the
seismic velocity measurements require longer samples due to signal noise and
wave propagation issues, the MC samples are only long enough to perform only
permeability measurements. Additionally, two sets of perpendicular samples
were taken 5 and 7 m from the start of the borehole as a background Grimsel
granodiorite reference.</p>
      <p id="d1e524">Thin sections were prepared directly from the ends of the samples and
observed under optical microscopy. Quantitative mineral analysis was obtained
at the University of Geneva using QEMSCAN<sup>®</sup>
Quanta 650F, an automated scanning electron microscope with mineral
identification based on a combination of back-scattered electron values,
energy-dispersive X-ray spectra, and X-ray count rates. High-resolution
mineralogical and petrographic maps were obtained with the
QEMSCAN<sup>®</sup> at a scanning resolution of
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which measures the mineral coverage in percent area.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Density, porosity, and permeability measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e547">Measurements of matrix volume and mass were performed after the samples were
dried in an oven at 100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 24 h for the granodiorite samples
and 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the fragile MC samples. The matrix volume was measured
using a helium pycnometer (AccuPyc 1330,
Micromeritics<sup>®</sup>). The dry mass was measured
with a precision balance. The bulk rock density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated
as the dry mass divided by the matrix volume of the sample. The porosity
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of each cylindrical sample was calculated from the geometrical
volume (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the matrix volume (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the helium pycnometer
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e645">A hydrostatic pressure vessel was used to measure the gas permeability of
each sample (detailed description of the apparatus and measurement technique
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.27"/>). The hydrostatic pressure vessel is equipped to measure
samples of 2.5 cm in diameter and up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm in length at confining
pressures up to 20 MPa. Hydraulic oil is used as the confining fluid, which
is controlled with a screw-type displacement pump that regulates the
confining pressure within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 MPa. The sample assembly consists of
the cylindrical rock specimen placed between two stainless steel disks
fastened by a soft PVC tube to isolate the sample from the confining fluid.
The two stainless steel disks have interconnected circular grooves to
distribute the fluid across the cross-sectional area of the sample. The disks
are connected via a plumbing system to the upstream and downstream
reservoirs, which can be isolated and filled with the injected gas. The
upstream and downstream reservoir, plus their associated plumbing network,
have volumes of 50.8 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 21.2 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The gas pressure
in the two reservoirs is measured within 0.05  %.</p>
      <p id="d1e683">Due to the low porosity and permeability in the granodioirite and MC, the
transient step technique was used to perform and analyze the flow experiments
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.28"/>. Experiments were performed at room temperature and an
effective pressure of 10 MPa, chosen to represent the effective stress
conditions in the GTS. Three confining pressure and pore pressure
configurations that preserved an effective pressure of 10 MPa were performed
to assess the Klinkenberg gas slippage effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.29"/>. For each sample
a pressure difference of 0.5 MPa was imposed between the upstream
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">us</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and downstream (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ds</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reservoir and allowed to
equilibrate at each of the pore pressure configurations (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">us</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ds</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 1.0 and 0.5 MPa, 3.0 and 2.5 MPa, and
7.0 and 6.5 MPa, respectively). In some cases, the sample permeability was
so low that reaching a full equilibrium between the up- and downstream
reservoir was not possible within laboratory timescale. For these samples,
only the beginning part of the partial pressure gradient equilibration has
been assessed (correlating to a pressure drop of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 MPa).</p>
      <?pagebreak page688?><p id="d1e744"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.30"/> developed a full analytical solution to the differential
equation describing the gas pressure inside the sample as a function of the
distance along the sample and time to estimate permeability. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.31"/>
developed a simple analytical expression to estimate permeability from the
measured pressure curves. The simple analytical solution
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sa</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">us</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sa</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ds</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          is a function of the compressibility, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and viscosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, length of the sample, <italic>L</italic>, slope of the differential
pressure vs. time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a function of the ratio between the volume of the
sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sa</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the volume of the up- and downstream reservoirs
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">us</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ds</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). The solution is accurate
within 0.3  % of the full expression if the pore volume is less than the
reservoir volumes, which is true for our experiments. Since the pressure
difference in the two reservoirs is small, we used an average pore pressure
to determine the compressibility and viscosity of the argon gas using the
NIST database <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.32"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Elastic wave velocity measurements and calculations</title>
      <p id="d1e885">A separate hydrostatic oil-medium pressure vessel, capable of reaching high
confining pressures, was used to measure the P- and S-ultrasonic elastic
wave velocities using the pulse transmission technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.33"/>. The
measurements were conducted on the mutually perpendicular samples up to
260 MPa and at room temperature conditions (detailed description of the
measurements found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="altparen.34"/>). The mechanical impulse is directed
into the sample by mounting the lead zirconate titanate piezoceramic
transducer inside a “head” assembly that also contains a buffer rod,
reducing the dispersion of energy. The setup is configured so that one
transducer transforms the electrical impulse (1 MHz resonance frequency) and
emits a mechanical wave at the coupling of the transducer with the sample.
After passing through the sample, another transducer converts the mechanical
wave back into an electrical signal. The electronic system consists of a
Hewlett Packard<sup>®</sup> 214B Pulse Generator that is
connected to the transducers with coaxial cables and the output is recorded
directly with a computer. To prevent oil seepage from the confining fluid
into the sample, a thin polyolefin heat shrink tube is fitted over the ends
of the transducers and the sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e897">The velocity in the rock is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M45" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">with</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">system</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the P- and S-wave velocities, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are a function of
the travel time through the sample, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and its length,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The travel time through the sample is determined by subtracting the
travel time of the cabling in the source–receiver system,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">system</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from the total time of flight of the impulses recorded,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1011">The waveforms are recorded at stepwise increases or decreases in pressure in
the loading and unloading cycles performed for each P- and S-wave experiment.
Measurements were recorded across the full pressure range of 30 to 260 MPa
of the apparatus to investigate the properties closest to present-day
low-pressure conditions at the GTS (minimum principal stress 8 to 12 MPa,
maximum principal stress 13–17 MPa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="altparen.35"/>) and to study the
poro-elastic effect on seismic velocities after crack closure at high
pressure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.36"/>. The measurements were made at room temperature and
in dry, undrained conditions. Recordings of the waveform were measured within
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 MPa and a travel time accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>s.</p>
      <p id="d1e1041">Velocity anisotropy (A<italic>V</italic>) was estimated from the maximum, minimum, and mean velocities using
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mean</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Estimates of the dynamic elastic moduli were also calculated for each
experiment. The P- and S-wave moduli are represented in the general form as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The P-wave moduli for the vertical
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum horizontal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) samples are represented by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Similarly, the S-wave moduli, also
known as shear modulus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), for the vertical and maximum horizontal
samples are represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The
elastic moduli are estimated by applying the isotropic equations to the
vertical and horizontal components separately in order to estimate the P- and
S-wave moduli <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.37"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.38"/> show that the error in applying
the isotropic equations to the vertical and horizontal components separately
in the absence of having the 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-oriented sample is negligible. The
dynamic Young's moduli are approximated for the parallel (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
perpendicular (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) components using the following equations:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The dynamic Poisson's ratio for the parallel (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and perpendicular
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sample is calculated using the isotropic equation
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M69" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1475">The dynamic bulk modulus for the parallel (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and perpendicular
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sample is calculated using the isotropic equation
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page689?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e1551">In general there is a decrease in grain size in the TZ toward the MC
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d; data available in Wenning et al., 2018). Additionally, millimeter-thick shear bands become more
frequent nearer to the MC until reaching the sharp boundary with the MC. The
MC itself is heterogeneously layered and folded. The compositional and
microstructural transition from the “host” granodiorite, through the
transition zone (TZ), and the mylonitic core (MC) are depicted in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and the rock composition is summarized in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The density of granodiorite samples irrespective of
their proximity to the MC varies between 2.72 and 2.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with porosity varying between 0.4 to 1  % (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). In
general, the samples do not have visible open microcracks; thus, the porosity
occurs between grain contacts (i.e., intergranular micropores). The density
of the MC from both sampling locations is 2.80 and 2.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and porosity estimates are 0 and 1 %, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1597">The samples (S5 to S20.1) from the granodiorite are made up of various
amounts of plagioclase (albite), quartz, K-feldspar, biotite/phlogopite,
muscovite, and epidote. The amount of each mineral phase and microstructure
depends on the vicinity to the mylonitic core. In the samples taken from the
host granodiorite (S5 and S7) as well as samples farthest from the mylonitic
core (S19.5 and S19.6) the microstructure and composition is similar.
Plagioclase is the most abundant mineral phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %). The
sub-millimeter to &gt; 10 mm big plagioclase grains are rounded
to subangular. The grain size of plagioclase varies from sub-millimeter to
&gt; 10 mm. Needle-like sericite inclusions
(&lt; 0.1 mm) form within the plagioclase cleavage planes,
indicating that hydrothermal alteration occurred. Quartz subgrains also
develop along the boundaries and within large plagioclase grains. In larger
plagioclase grains brittle fractures are filled with biotite and quartz.
Quartz is the second-most abundant mineral phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 to 25 %).
Quartz grains of variable size (&lt; 1–2 mm) typically occur as
many rounded to subhedral individual subgrains that form lenses or develop in
the strain shadows of plagioclase clasts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The main
difference between the host granodiorite (S5 and S7) and the beginning of the
transition zone (S19.5 and S19.6) is the K-feldspar concentration, which is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 to 17 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 %, respectively. Phyllosilicates in the
form of biotite and muscovite form anastamosing lenses of mixed muscovite and
biotite with variable thickness across the thin section, which comprise about
15 to 18 % of the total mineralogy. Biotite forms &lt; 0.1 to 1 mm
grains, of which the individual grains are randomly oriented in the
anastamosing lenses.</p>
      <p id="d1e1630">A progressive change in the overall microstructure, state of the individual
minerals, and the mineral composition is observed in the transition zone
between samples S19.7 and S20.1. In Sample S19.7 the foliation becomes more
continuous across the thin section when compared to the host granodiorite
samples. Plagioclase deforms brittlely in the form of fracturing
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), while grain boundary migration, undulose
extinction, and subgrain rotation is observed in the quartz grains indicates
ductility. Plagioclase and quartz grain size are similar to host
granodiorite. Lenses of biotite and muscovite extend across the thin section
more continuously; however, the lenses form variable thicknesses that wrap
around the intermixed plagioclase and quartz. The anastomosing lenses are
still present. In the samples nearest the MC (S20.0 and S20.1), the
continuity and thickness of the mica-rich layers across the sample are the
most developed. The foliation planes are oriented towards the parallel
alignment of the individual grains. Biotite and muscovite grains are
especially larger in samples S20.0 and S20.1, where individual grains can be
&gt;5 mm long. While lenses of fine-grained phyllosilicates occur,
the overall grain size, continuity, layer thickness, and orientation of the
individual grains is greater and more continuous. The total phyllosilicate
amount increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 to 18 % in samples S5 to S19.6 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % in samples S20.0 and S20.1, with the other tectosilicates
(plagioclase, K-feldspar, and quartz) reducing as a result. Biotite and
quartz appear in the strain shadows of the plagioclase clasts
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1653">Sample composition, seismic velocity, and
permeability across the transition zone into the mylonitic core. Depth
corresponds to sample name in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.
<bold>(a)</bold> Tectosilicates – quartz, plagioclase, and K-feldspar (red);
phyllosilicates – biotite and muscovite (green); and epidote (grey).
<bold>(b, c)</bold> P- and S-wave velocity parallel to foliation (orange) and
perpendicular to foliation (blue). Measured at 30 MPa hydrostatic confining
pressure. <bold>(d)</bold> Permeability parallel to foliation (orange) and
perpendicular (blue). Permeability is reported as the median value measured
for each sample, and the bars show the range of values in terms of minimum
and maximum. Measured at 10 MPa effective pressure. For all panels the
shaded region depicts the range of values from the host
granodiorite samples (S5 and S7), the circular markers show the values
measured through the transition zone (TZ), and the triangular markers show
the values measured in the mylonitic core (MC). Error bars are depicted where
the error is larger than the marker size.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1677">Summary of sample composition: sample name refers to
depth in the borehole; rock type refers to either the host granodiorite,
transition zone (TZ), or mylonitic core (MC); dry bulk density and porosity
are reported as an average of individual measurements for each sample
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); and mineral composition is derived from the
QEMSCAN analysis of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-thin section in  % area. Mineral
abbreviations: Bt – biotite; Phl – phlogopite; Ms – muscovite; Ep –
epidote; Ab – albite; Kfs – K-feldspar; and Qz – quartz.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rock</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Bt+Phl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ms</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ep</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Ab</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Kfs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Qz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Other</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Host</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Host</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S19.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S19.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S19.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S19.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S20.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S20.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S23.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2209">The MC sample (S23.6) is constituted of very fine-grained ultramylonitic
(more than 90 % grain size reduction) plagioclase (31 %), biotite
(27 %), quartz (22 %), and epidote (12 %) making up the main mineral
constituents. The foliation is defined by the biotite-quartz/plagioclase
preferred shape orientation (layers typically &lt; 0.1 mm).
Recrystallized plagioclase and quartz form rotated clasts within the
biotite-quartz foliation. The shear zones in the region are often interpreted
as former mafic dykes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.39"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The MC has a gradient of
deformation between the Grimsel granodiorite in the TZ and the MC, and most
notably there is a heterogeneous layering within the ultramylonite with
larger grain lenses that are compositionally similar to the granodiorite
(e.g., Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d). We interpret this structure more broadly as a
mylonitic shear zone with a strain gradient of decreasing deformation away
from the mylonitic cores.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t!}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2221"><bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> display the results for foliation parallel velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) separated
into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>.
<bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> display the results for foliation perpendicular velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) separated into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold>.
For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> red colors indicate faster velocities and blue colors depict slower velocities
(magnitude defined on the color bar).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Velocity measurements and elastic moduli calculation</title>
      <?pagebreak page690?><p id="d1e2349">Seismic velocities (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>; data available in Wenning et al., 2018) are
reported for the 30 MPa confining pressure measurement (i.e., the closest
measurement to the stress magnitudes in the GTS). The measured velocities
parallel to foliation at 30 MPa, (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) show an increase across the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 m
transition zone. In the two samples taken from the host granodiorite (S5 and
S7) P-wave velocity parallel to the foliation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Samples S19.5 to S19.7 taken from the
beginning of the transition zone have comparable velocities to the host
granodiorite samples (5.55 to 5.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Transitioning towards
the mylonitic core the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases steadily and
reaches a maximum in sample S20.1 (6.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) directly adjacent
to the MC at 20.2 m. The S-wave velocity follows a similar trend where the
host samples and the samples farthest from the mylonitic core have a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.42 to 3.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
velocities increase steadily and reach a maximum nearest the MC (S20.1:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The velocities
measured perpendicular to the foliation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, fluctuate without a consistent trend between 4.98
and 5.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3.20 and 3.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The P- and S-wave anisotropy is generally lower away from and
higher near the MC. However, there are outliers (e.g., S19.6), which can be
attributed to bias from either a slower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> velocity or a faster
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> velocity. The seismic velocities are in general agreement with
previous measurements on Grimsel granodiorite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.40"/> and other
granodiorite samples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2647">The dynamic elastic moduli behave like the velocities because the density
remains consistent for each sample. Therefore, the velocities exert greater
influence on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> moduli. Approaching the MC each
respective dynamic elastic moduli increases by 10 to 20 GPa for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains almost constant, which
corroborates previous measurements on Grimsel granodiorite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.42"/>.
The dynamic Poisson's ratio remains relatively uniform throughout.</p>
      <?pagebreak page691?><p id="d1e2697">Additionally, seismic velocities were measured up to confining pressures of
260 MPa in order to determine the intrinsic crack-free velocities of the
rocks (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
velocity contours show that for a given confining pressure, the velocities
parallel to foliation tend to increase to maximum values closest to the
mylonitic core and that there is minimal sporadic variation in the
perpendicular-to-foliation velocity measurements.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2727">Summary of density, porosity, elastic properties and anisotropy, and
permeability obtained from laboratory measurements. Laboratory velocities
measured at 30 MPa confining pressure and permeability measured at 10 MPa
effective pressure.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><italic>E</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><italic>K</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Direction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(GPa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(GPa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(GPa)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">8.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">5.95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.70</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH19.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH19.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">5.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH19.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">5.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH19.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH20.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH20.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">-</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">-</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH20.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SBH23.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page692?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Permeability measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e4021">Permeability decreases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>)
from the host granodiorite and farthest samples in the transition zone (0.99
to 8.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) towards the samples nearest the
mylonitic core (0.03 to 1.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) along the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> direction  (data available in Wenning et al., 2018). The permeability perpendicular to the foliation
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuates from 0.52 to 4.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Permeabilities of similar host Grimsel granodiorite at 5 MPa are 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.43"/> and measurements on Kola granodiorite
samples range from approximately 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at effective
pressures of 10 to 50 MPa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.44"/>. Directional permeability of the
mylonitic core was measured on two samples from separate foliated shear zones
due to difficulties in sample preparation (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is from 20.3 m
depth and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is from 23.6 m depth). The permeability is
0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> parallel to foliation and
0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> perpendicular to the foliation. Flow along
the boundary of a quartz-filled vein that crosscuts the perpendicular sample
is believed to cause the increase in permeability perpendicular to foliation
in the mylonitic core.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Shear zone characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e4301">Many studies on the transition of elastic and fluid flow properties in and
around fault cores and damage zones have been concentrated on outcrop
material of brittle faults <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.45"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.46"/> present models
for fault core geometries, with fault cores composed of fault gouge or
cataclasite. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.47"/> expand this model to include both
single-fault core damage zones and damage zones made up of several
anastamosing faults. Laboratory measurements on samples from natural fault
systems have led to the development of brittle fault permeability and elastic
or mechanical properties that are microfracture dependent. In such systems,
damage is concentrated in the fault core, which produces fault gouge or
cataclasite that can either be higher or lower in permeability than the
surrounding host rock. In the host rock directly contacting the fault zone,
microfracturing due to strain displacement around the fault leads to
increased permeability and decreased elastic or mechanical strength
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.48"/>. Permeability decreases and elastic or mechanical strength
increases moving away from the damage zone core, as the microfracture
intensity decreases away from the shear zone
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.49"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4321">In ductile shear zones the alignment of anisotropic minerals in CPO or SPO
due to strain accumulation has been a central focus for crustal reflectivity
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Additionally, temperature and
fluid content can modify measured elastic wave velocities
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.51"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.52"/> discuss the existence of
transition zones in which the strain progressively increases towards the
ductile shear zone core, causing gradual changes in the physical properties
around such faults. The<?pagebreak page693?> permeability across a mylonitic ductile shear zone
was estimated from relationships between porosity and pore throat radius
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.53"/>. They show that permeability is reduced in the central shear
zone core but is higher in the surrounding strain gradient, which is higher
than the host rock. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.54"/> performed triaxial deformation
experiments in Westerly granite across the brittle–ductile transition with
simultaneous measurements of porosity. The authors found that the deformation
in the ductile regime is associated with compaction, while the brittle regime
is primarily dilatant. For shear zones that have undergone the transition
from ductile to brittle deformation, a competing process between
microfracture and mineral-orientation-controlled physical properties can be
envisaged.</p>
      <p id="d1e4343">The shear zone selected for measurements of seismic velocities and
permeability in this study preserves both ductile and overprinting brittle
structures. The shear zone penetrated by the borehole at GTS is characterized
by foliation aligned with the mylonitic core that developed under
viscous-flow deformation conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.55"/>. The foliation
intensity is highest nearest the mylonitic core and decreases into the host
granodiorite. The brittle fractures, which are bounded between the mylonitic
cores, formed during a later brittle overprint. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows
that the elastic and permeability transition into the mylonitic core is
dissimilar to models derived from brittle fault zones
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.56"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, even though brittle deformation is
evident in the damage zone. The measurements from GTS show a trend of
increasing velocities and stable to decreasing permeability in the plane
parallel to foliation in the transition zone. In the direction perpendicular
to foliation, the velocities and permeability have minor fluctuation in the
vicinity of the mylonitic core. The ductile strain gradient in the transition
zone does not appear to be influenced by the later stages of brittle
deformation, as indicated by the increased seismic velocities and slightly
decreasing permeability parallel to foliation towards the core in the
transition zone. Should there be a brittle overprint, velocities would be
expected to decrease due to microfracturing; however, this is not the case
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.57"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4359">Instead, within the transition zone the both elastic and fluid flow
properties are controlled by mineralogical changes in the rocks.
Microfractures in thin section are scarce; thus, most of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1  %
porosity are intergranular micropores. It is important to note that these
changes are localized within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m of the ductile mylonitic core.
Since the material is bored from an underground research lab, alteration
processes and weathering should be suppressed in such samples. The mineralogy
of the samples shows a gradual change in composition, losing tectosilicates
(Pl, Fsp, and Qz) and gaining phyllosilicates (Bt and Ms), through the
transition zone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). There is an increase in foliation
intensity towards the mylonitic core. The faster foliation-parallel
velocities are controlled by the alignment of the platy phyllosilicate
minerals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.58"/>. Higher foliation-parallel
permeability compared to flow perpendicular, as measured in the GTS samples,
has been measured in previous studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In low grade to
ductile deformation, changes in the mineralogy and foliation structure alter
the connection of intergranular micropores of the platy phyllosilicate and
tectosilicate minerals
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In this
study the changes in mineralogy, most notably the
phyllosilicate-to-tectosilicate ratio, is a driver in both the velocity and
permeability anisotropy, where microcracks do not have a driving role due to
their scarcity.</p>
      <p id="d1e4393">Outside the MCs, fractures along the borehole wall are uncommon, as indicated
by optical televiewer images <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.61"/>. Between the MCs the density
of fractures is high enough to have been termed damage zone. Although some
fractures penetrate the MCs, they are typically quartz-filled and generally
do not connect the granodiorite on either side of the mylonitic core. In the
damage zone itself, fluid flow properties and elasticity are governed by the
micro and macroscopic fractures. In the damage zone the velocities are
decreased and the permeability increases, indicated by logging and pump tests
in the borehole <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.62"/>. Since the microfracturing does not appear
to have influence outside the MCs, the displacement of these brittle features
is likely small <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.63"/>. Similar mapped faults in the region have
cataclastic gouge or fault breccia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.64"/>, indicating that the
fault at the GTS in not mature and has not accommodated much of the brittle
displacement since the ductile structure is still preserved.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t!}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4410">Conceptual model for the characteristics
of faults in crystalline rock and their associated petrophysical properties
during transition from ductile to brittle deformation conditions.
<bold>(a)</bold> Formation of ductile shear zones with increasing foliation in the transition
zone (TZ) nearest the mylonitic core (MC), <bold>(b)</bold> immature brittle fault with
ductile transition zone preserved outside the MCs and the damage zone (DZ)
between, and <bold>(c)</bold> mature brittle fault and DZ, where the brittle features
dominate the fluid flow and elastic properties near the brittle fault cores
dominated by gouge (FC-G) and breccia/cataclasite (FC-B/C)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.65"><named-content content-type="pre">after</named-content></xref>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/683/2018/se-9-683-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Ductile–brittle transition in the fault zone</title>
      <?pagebreak page694?><p id="d1e4439">The measurements at the GTS lead us to hypothesize how fault properties might
vary not only in geometry but also in the transient evolution of the fault
itself. For the transition from a ductile to brittle fault system in
crystalline rock, two end-member behaviors can be envisaged: ductile and
brittle. While the rock is undergoing ductile deformation and localizing
along the mylonitic core shear zones, the deformation processes would be
accommodated by crystal–plastic flow. The highly strained and extreme
recrystallization in the ultramylonite in the mylonitic core, along with the
seritization of the plagioclase in the transition zone, indicate that fluids
were present and likely localized in the mylonitic core during deformation.
However, once the deformation and ductile structures were frozen in, the
ductile transition zone behaves in a manner where elasticity parallel to
foliation increases, transitioning from the host rock to the ductile core
parallel to the foliation, and permeability decreases in the core. On the
other hand, in the brittle damage zone model, microfracturing induces
permeability enhancement and weak elasticity nearest the fault core
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.66"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. This case study from the GTS is a
hybrid between the two end-member systems.</p>
      <p id="d1e4447">During the two ductile deformation phases, slip was accommodated along
localized foliated shear zones that are mylonitic and ultramylonitic
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.67"/>. The transition
from highly foliated and extremely recrystallized mylonitic cores towards the
host granodiorite represents a strain gradient, which is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 m thick
in this study (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). The highest foliation
intensity in the granodiorite nearest the mylonitic core also creates a
change in bulk mineralogy (i.e., more phyllosilicates and less
tectosilicates; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) and microstructure (i.e., more
laminated; Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), which alter the
petrophysical properties that, once frozen in, behave as those measured in
the transition zone and mylonitic core in this study (i.e., higher seismic
velocity parallel to foliation and lower permeability nearest the mylonitic
core). Fluid flow channelization in ductile shear zones have been argued
based on mobile elements (Ca, Mg, Na, and K) concentration, stabile isotopes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and fluid phase observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.68"/>. However, in this study and the study by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.69"/> the lowest-permeability measurements come from the mylonitic
core. While the current measurements come from the frozen-in ductile
microstructure, dynamic porosity changes might be occurring during
deformation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.70"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, which could enhance the
permeability in the mylonitic core. It is possible that the ductile shear
zone would behave in such a way that the long-term permeability of the shear
zone is low, creating a pressure seal. Then, during rupture, the seal
releases pore pressure and causes short-term permeability enhancement in the
form of microfractures and micropores around grains. This is corroborated by
fractures in the feldspar grains while at conditions with quartz
recrystalization.</p>
      <p id="d1e4493">The later stages of brittle deformation formed along the suitably oriented
ductile shear zones resulting in the current fault zone geometry at the GTS
shear zone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b). The brittle deformation is
bounded by the mylonitic cores. Due to the lack of damage outside these
mylonitic cores, this system is believed to be an “immature” fault, with
minimal brittle slip. Outside the mylonitic cores the properties are governed
by the frozen-in ductile structures. Inside the mylonitic cores the
properties are heterogeneously dispersed due to the macrofractures and their
associated small-scale microfractures, which reduce the seismic velocity.
Recent borehole measurements from pump tests in the damage zone indicate that
the transmissivity in the damage zone is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the host granodiorite has a
transmissivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.71"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4607">Finally, in the Grimsel region there are more “mature” brittle faults with
a more pronounced damage zone and altered fault core composition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.72"/>. These mature brittle fault cores consist of
gouges, cataclasites, and fault breccias in the middle of a fractured damage
zone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c). The properties are expected to behave
similar to the fault zone model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.73"/>, where there is an
inverse relationship between low seismic velocity (i.e., elasticity) and high
permeability around the fault core, arising due to the
extensive microfracturing in the<?pagebreak page695?> brittle damage zone. The fault core in such
a brittle fault typically has lower permeability than the surroundings due to
the clay minerals in the gouge, cataclasite, or fault breccia
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.74"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4624">As rocks are exhumed and cooled, this system would transition from the
ductile shear zone to a brittle damage zone. Thus, their mechanical
properties and how fluids percolate through the entire shear zone would be
highly dependent on the transient condition (depth or fault maturity) in
which the fault occurs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Implication for geothermal energy production and waste disposal</title>
      <p id="d1e4633">In crystalline rocks the elastic, mechanical, and fluid flow properties are
important characteristics for the successful exploitation of natural
resources. Mechanically, bulk strain can localize in the fault zone and the
mechanical properties can govern earthquake rupture and fracture propagation.
In terms of fluid flow, fault zones can act as both fluid conduits and
barriers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.75"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. These can be significant in terms of
building or releasing pore fluid pressures closely coupled to earthquake
rupture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.76"/>. The elastic, mechanical, and fluid flow
properties of fault zones are also directly linked to geothermal projects
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.77"/>, as well as the security of long-term waste storage
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.78"/>. With the technological advance of horizontal
drilling and hydraulic fracturing the influence and interplay of mechanical
and fluid flow anisotropy and heterogeneity are important when addressing
stimulation in structurally complex environments
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4655">The case at GTS emphasizes the interplay between properties controlled by
matrix mineral and fracture-controlled properties. The shear zone at GTS
serves as a proxy structure expected in a geothermal reservoir. Understanding
the orientation of subsurface foliation and proximity to shear zones can
assist the efficiency of energy production. The interplay of matrix and
fracture flow in such systems should be considered as an additional
complexity. When considering the circulation of fluids, well placement in a
geothermal injection/production system would need to address the geometry of
subsurface heterogeneities. Present-day hydrothermal fluids in the Grimsel
region flow in “pipe”-like channels (i.e., they are not uniform across the
shear zone) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.80"/>. Mapping such structures in a crystalline
basement will prove to be a challenge for the successful development of
geothermal energy as a resource. Hydraulic stimulation is almost certainly
required to enhance fluid flow in such crystalline systems. Mechanical
anisotropy and heterogeneous pore geometries have been shown to have
considerable influence on damage evolution and failure mode
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.81"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The importance of
understanding the effect of mechanical discontinuities on hydraulic
stimulation is shown with numerical models of damage propagation across
mechanical layers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The heterogeneous and anisotropic
elastic and fluid flow properties at GTS show that mechanical/elastic
foliation heterogeneity must be determined, along with stress magnitude and
orientation when planning the optimal borehole placement, trajectory, and
stimulation design. The low permeability in the ductile mylonitic cores
measured in this study suggest that there might be significant
compartmentalization around such structures.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4678">The shear zone at the GTS displays contrasting behavior in a single shear
zone due to the fault evolution from ductile to brittle deformation. The
ductile history is frozen in outside the mylonitic cores and is characterized
by a transition zone of increasing foliation intensity from the host
granodiorite towards the mylonitic cores. In the transition zone, the seismic
velocity of the foliation-parallel samples increases towards the mylonitic
core, while the velocity perpendicular to the foliation remains fairly
constant. The permeability is also anisotropic and is lower in the samples
nearest to and within the mylonitic core, suggesting that both permeability
and seismic velocities in the transition zone are greatly influenced by the
amount and texture of phyllosilicates in the rock mass. Recent brittle
deformation is bounded between the foliated mylonitic cores and constitutes
macroscopic fractures and associated microfractures that rarely penetrate
through the mylonitic cores.</p>
      <p id="d1e4681">The evolution of the system from the formation of the localized shear zones
in the earliest observed ductile regime (ca. 21 Ma) and the current brittle
regime follows three steps: (1) the localization of ductile deformation,
(2) shearing along the rheological discontinuity causing higher foliation
intensity in the granodiorite nearest to and mylonitization of the mylonitic
core, and (3) subsequent brittle deformation along the foliated mylonitic
cores. We hypothesize that the properties of this shear zone suggest that
brittle deformation is immature in the sense that the overprint has not
effected the ductile transition zone.</p>
      <p id="d1e4684">Encountering such structures in geothermal reservoirs or waste disposal sites
would prove to be challenging. The elastic, mechanical, and fluid flow
heterogeneity caused by the mylonitic cores and their juxtaposition to a
brittle damage zone would need to be considered for the optimal engineering
design of any reservoir usage system.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4691">All data are available through <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000245921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000245921</ext-link> (Wenning et al., 2018).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4701">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4707">The seismic velocity and permeability experiments were performed in the Rock
Deformation Laboratory at ETH Zurich. We thank Andrea Moscariello for
allowing us to use the QEMSCAN analysis at the University of Geneva. The
Swiss National Science Foundation research grant NRP-70 (Exploration and
characterization of deep underground reservoirs) provided funding for this
project. This study is part of the Grimsel ISC project, established by the
Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research – Supply of
Electricity (SCCER-SoE) with the support of the Swiss Commission for
Technology and Innovation (CTI). Florian Amann, Evangelos Moulas, Valentin
Gischig, Joseph Doetsch, Reza Jalali, and Hannes Krietsch are thanked for
their comments and assistance during the course of this study. The authors
are grateful to Telemaco Tesei and to the anonymous referee for their
constructive comments that improved this paper.<?xmltex \hack{\newline\newline}?> Edited
by: Bernhard Grasemann <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Reviewed by: Telemaco Tesei and one
anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Allen et al.(2017)Allen, Tatham, Faulkner, Mariani, and
Boulton</label><mixed-citation>Allen, M., Tatham, D., Faulkner, D., Mariani, E., and Boulton, C.:
Permeability
and seismic velocity and their anisotropy across the Alpine Fault, New
Zealand: an insight from laboratory measurements on core from the Deep Fault
Drilling Project phase 1 (DFDP-1), J. Geophys. Res.-Solid
Earth, 122,  6160–6179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JB014355</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Almqvist and Mainprice(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Almqvist, B. S. and Mainprice, D.: Seismic properties and anisotropy of the
continental crust: Predictions based on mineral texture and rock
microstructure, Rev. Geophys., 55,  367–433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000552</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Amann et al.(2018)Amann, Gischig, Evans, Doetsch, Jalali, Valley,
Krietsch, Dutler, Villiger, Brixel, Klepikova, Kittilä, Madonna, Wiemer,
Saar, Loew, Driesner, Maurer, and Giardini</label><mixed-citation>Amann, F., Gischig, V., Evans, K., Doetsch, J., Jalali, R., Valley, B.,
Krietsch, H., Dutler, N., Villiger, L., Brixel, B., Klepikova, M., Kittilä,
A., Madonna, C., Wiemer, S., Saar, M. O., Loew, S., Driesner, T., Maurer, H.,
and Giardini, D.: The seismo-hydromechanical behavior during deep geothermal
reservoir stimulations: open questions tackled in a decameter-scale in situ
stimulation experiment, Solid Earth, 9, 115–137,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-115-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-9-115-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Barton et al.(1993)Barton, Larsen, Page, and Howard</label><mixed-citation>
Barton, C. C., Larsen, E., Page, W., and Howard, T.: Characterizing fractured
rock for fluid-flow, geomechanical, and paleostress modeling: Methods and
preliminary results from Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Report, Geological Survey,
Denver, CO, USA, 1–62, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Baud et al.(2005)Baud, Louis, David, Rawling, and Wong</label><mixed-citation>
Baud, P., Louis, L., David, C., Rawling, G. C., and Wong, T.-F.: Effects of
bedding and foliation on mechanical anisotropy, damage evolution and failure
mode, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 245, 223–249, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Belgrano et al.(2016)Belgrano, Herwegh, and Berger</label><mixed-citation>
Belgrano, T. M., Herwegh, M., and Berger, A.: Inherited structural controls
on
fault geometry, architecture and hydrothermal activity: an example from
Grimsel Pass, Switzerland, Swiss J. Geosci., 1–20, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Birch(1960)</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, F.: The Velocity of Compressional Waves in Rocks to 10 Kilobars, Part
1,
J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1083–1102, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Birch(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, F.: The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars: 2,
J. Geophys. Res., 66, 2199–2224, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bolognesi and Bistacchi(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Bolognesi, F. and Bistacchi, A.: Weakness and mechanical anisotropy of
phyllosilicate-rich cataclasites developed after mylonites of a low-angle
normal fault (Simplon Line, Western Alps), J. Struct. Geol., 83,
1–12, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Brace et al.(1968)Brace, Walsh, and Frangos</label><mixed-citation>
Brace, W., Walsh, J., and Frangos, W.: Permeability of granite under high
pressure, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2225–2236, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Busetti et al.(2014)Busetti, Jiao, and Reches</label><mixed-citation>
Busetti, S., Jiao, W., and Reches, Z.: Geomechanics of hydraulic fracturing
microseismicity: Part 1. Shear, hybrid, and tensile events, AAPG Bulletin,
98, 2439–2457, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Caine et al.(1996)Caine, Evans, and Forster</label><mixed-citation>
Caine, J. S., Evans, J. P., and Forster, C. B.: Fault zone architecture and
permeability structure, Geology, 24, 1025–1028, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Challandes et al.(2008)Challandes, Marquer, and Villa</label><mixed-citation>
Challandes, N., Marquer, D., and Villa, I. M.: PTt modelling, fluid
circulation, and 39 Ar-40 Ar and Rb-Sr mica ages in the Aar Massif shear
zones (Swiss Alps), Swiss J. Geosci., 101, 269–288, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chester and Logan(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Chester, F. and Logan, J.: Implications for mechanical properties of brittle
faults from observations of the Punchbowl fault zone, California,
Pure Appl. Geophys., 124, 79–106, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>David and Wassermann(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
David, C. and Wassermann, J.: The KG2B Project: A World-Wide Benchmark of Low
Permeability Measurement, Poromechanics VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Biot Conference on Poromechanics, 1153–1161, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Dicker and Smits(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Dicker, A. and Smits, R.: A practical approach for determining permeability
from laboratory pressure-pulse decay measurements, in: International meeting
on petroleum engineering, Soc. Petrol. Eng J., SPE 17578, 285–292, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Donath(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Donath, F. A.: Experimental study of shear failure in anisotropic rocks,
Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 72, 985–989, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Etheridge et al.(1983)Etheridge, Wall, and Vernon</label><mixed-citation>
Etheridge, M., Wall, V., and Vernon, R.: The role of the fluid phase during
regional metamorphism and deformation, J. Metamorph. Geol., 1,
205–226, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Faulkner and Armitage(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D. and Armitage, P.: The effect of tectonic environment on
permeability development around faults and in the brittle crust, Earth
Planet. Sci. Lett., 375, 71–77, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Faulkner and Rutter(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Faulkner, D. and Rutter, E.: The gas permeability of clay-bearing fault gouge
at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 147, 147–156,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Faulkner et al.(2003)Faulkner, Lewis, and Rutter</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D., Lewis, A., and Rutter, E.: On the internal structure and
mechanics of large strike-slip fault zones: field observations of the
Carboneras fault in southeastern Spain, Tectonophysics, 367, 235–251, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Faulkner et al.(2006)Faulkner, Mitchell, Healy, and
Heap</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D., Mitchell, T., Healy, D., and Heap, M.: Slip on `weak' faults by
the rotation of regional stress in the fracture damage zone, Nature, 444,
922–925, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Faulkner et al.(2010)Faulkner, Jackson, Lunn, Schlische, Shipton,
Wibberley, and Withjack</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D., Jackson, C., Lunn, R., Schlische, R., Shipton, Z., Wibberley,
C.,
and Withjack, M.: A review of recent developments concerning the structure,
mechanics and fluid flow properties of fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 32, 1557–1575, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Fountain et al.(1984)Fountain, Hurich, and Smithson</label><mixed-citation>
Fountain, D. M., Hurich, C. A., and Smithson, S. B.: Seismic reflectivity of
mylonite zones in the crust, Geology, 12, 195–198, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Griffiths et al.(2017)Griffiths, Heap, Xu, Chen, and
Baud</label><mixed-citation>
Griffiths, L., Heap, M. J., Xu, T., Chen, C.-f., and Baud, P.: The influence
of
pore geometry and orientation on the strength and stiffness of porous rock,
J. Struct. Geol., 96, 149–160, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Griffiths et al.(2018)Griffiths, Lengliné, Heap, Baud, and
Schmittbuhl</label><mixed-citation>
Griffiths, L., Lengliné, O., Heap, M., Baud, P., and Schmittbuhl, J.:
Thermal
cracking in Westerly Granite monitored using direct<?pagebreak page697?> wave velocity, coda wave
interferometry, and acoustic emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 123, 2246–2261, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Géraud et al.(1995)Géraud, Caron, and Faure</label><mixed-citation>
Géraud, Y., Caron, J.-M., and Faure, P.: Porosity network of a ductile
shear
zone, J. Struct. Geol., 17, 1757–1769, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hsieh et al.(1981)Hsieh, Tracy, Neuzil, Bredehoeft, and
Silliman</label><mixed-citation>
Hsieh, P., Tracy, J., Neuzil, C., Bredehoeft, J., and Silliman, S.: A
transient
laboratory method for determining the hydraulic properties of
`rocks' – I. Theory, in: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and
Mining Sciences &amp; Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 18,  245–252, Elsevier,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Hudson et al.(2011)Hudson, Cosgrove, Kemppainen, and
Johansson</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, J. A., Cosgrove, J. W., Kemppainen, K., and Johansson, E.: Faults in
crystalline rock and the estimation of their mechanical properties at the
Olkiluoto site, western Finland, Eng. Geol., 117, 246–258, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Jalali et al.(2017)Jalali, Gischig, Doetsch, Krietsch, Amann, and
Klepikova</label><mixed-citation>
Jalali, M., Gischig, V., Doetsch, J., Krietsch, H., Amann, F., and Klepikova,
M.: Mechanical, Hydraulic and Seismological Behavior of Crystalline Rock as a
Response to Hydraulic Fracturing at the Grimsel Test Site, in: Proceedings of
51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, USA, ARMA 17-0962, 1–9, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Jefferies et al.(2006)Jefferies, Holdsworth, Wibberley, Shimamoto,
Spiers, Niemeijer, and Lloyd</label><mixed-citation>
Jefferies, S., Holdsworth, R., Wibberley, C., Shimamoto, T., Spiers, C.,
Niemeijer, A., and Lloyd, G.: The nature and importance of phyllonite
development in crustal-scale fault cores: an example from the Median Tectonic
Line, Japan, J. Struct. Geol., 28, 220–235, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Jones and Nur(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, T. and Nur, A.: Seismic velocity and anisotropy in mylonites and the
reflectivity of deep crystal fault zones, Geology, 10, 260–263, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Jones and Nur(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, T. and Nur, A.: The Nature of Seismic Reflections From Deep Crustal
Fault Zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3153–3171, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kern and Wenk(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Kern, H. and Wenk, H.-R.: Fabric-Related Velocity Anisotropy and Shear Wave
Splitting in Rocks From the Santa Rosa Mylonite Zone, California,
J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11213–11223, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Keusen et al.(1989)Keusen, Ganguin, Schuler, Buletti, and
Geotest</label><mixed-citation>
Keusen, H., Ganguin, J., Schuler, P., Buletti, M., and Geotest: Grimsel Test
Site: Geology, Report, 1–166, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Klinkenberg(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Klinkenberg, L.: The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases, in:
Drilling and production practice, American Petroleum Institute, 200–213, 1941.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Krietsch et al.(2017)Krietsch, Gischig, Jalali, Amann, Evans,
Doetsch, and Valley</label><mixed-citation>
Krietsch, H., Gischig, V., Jalali, M., Amann, F., Evans, K., Doetsch, J., and
Valley, B.: Stress measurements in crystalline rock: Comparison of
overcoring, hydraulic fracturing and induced seismicity results, in:
Proceedings of 51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, USA, ARMA-17-0733, 1–8, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Leclère et al.(2015)Leclère, Cappa, Faulkner, Fabbri, Armitage, and
Blake</label><mixed-citation>
Leclère, H., Cappa, F., Faulkner, D., Fabbri, O., Armitage, P., and
Blake, O.:
Development and maintenance of fluid overpressures in crustal fault zones by
elastic compaction and implications for earthquake swarms, J. Geophys.
Res.-Solid Earth, 120, 4450–4473, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lloyd et al.(2011a)Lloyd, Butler, Casey, Tatham, and
Mainprice</label><mixed-citation>Lloyd, G., Butler, R., Casey, M., Tatham, D., and Mainprice, D.: Constraints
on
the seismic properties of the middle and lower continental crust, Geological
Society, London, Special Publications, 360, 7–32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP360.2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP360.2</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lloyd et al.(2011b)Lloyd, Halliday, Butler, Casey,
Kendall, Wookey, and Mainprice</label><mixed-citation>Lloyd, G., Halliday, J., Butler, R., Casey, M., Kendall, J., Wookey, J., and
Mainprice, D.: From crystal to crustal: petrofabric-derived seismic modelling
of regional tectonics, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 360,
49–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP360.4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/SP360.4</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Mainprice(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Mainprice, D.: Seismic Anisotropy of the Deep Earth from a Mineral and Rock
Physics Perspective, Treatise in Geophysics – Volume 2 Mineral Physics, 437–482, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Mancktelow et al.(1998)Mancktelow, Grujic, and
Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
Mancktelow, N. S., Grujic, D., and Johnson, E. L.: An SEM study of porosity
and
grain boundary microstructure in quartz mylonites, Simplon Fault Zone,
Central Alps, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 131, 71–85, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Marquer and Burkhard(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Marquer, D. and Burkhard, M.: Fluid circulation, progressive deformation and
mass-transfer processes in the upper crust: the example of basement-cover
relationships in the External Crystalline Massifs, Switzerland,
J. Struct. Geol., 14, 1047–1057, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Mavko et al.(2009)Mavko, Mukerji, and Dvorkin</label><mixed-citation>
Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J.: Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for
Seismic Analysis of Porous Media, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press,
p. 524, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Mitchell and Faulkner(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. and Faulkner, D.: The nature and origin of off-fault damage
surrounding strike-slip fault zones with a wide range of displacements: a
field study from the Atacama fault system, northern Chile, J. Struct. Geol., 31, 802–816, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Mitchell and Faulkner(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. and Faulkner, D.: Towards quantifying the matrix permeability of
fault damage zones in low porosity rocks, Earth  Planet. Sci.
Lett., 339, 24–31, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Morrow et al.(1994)Morrow, Lockner, Hickman, Rusanov, and
Röckel</label><mixed-citation>
Morrow, C., Lockner, D., Hickman, S., Rusanov, M., and Röckel, T.: Effects
of
lithology and depth on the permeability of core samples from the Kola and KTB
drill holes, J. Geophys., 99, 7263–7274, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>NIST(2017)</label><mixed-citation>NIST: <uri>http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/</uri> (last access: 30 June 2017), National
Institute of Standards and Technology, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Nur and Simmons(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
Nur, A. and Simmons, G.: The effect of saturation on velocity in low porosity
rocks, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 7, 183–193, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Pini et al.(2009)Pini, Ottiger, Burlini, Storti, and
Mazzotti</label><mixed-citation>Pini, R., Ottiger, S., Burlini, L., Storti, G., and Mazzotti, M.: Role of
adsorption and swelling on the dynamics of gas injection in coal, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 114,   1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005961" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JB005961</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Rawling et al.(2002)Rawling, Baud, and Wong</label><mixed-citation>Rawling, G. C., Baud, P., and Wong, T.: Dilatancy, brittle strength, and
anisotropy of foliated rocks: Experimental deformation and micromechanical
modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 107,  1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JB000472</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Rey et al.(1994)Rey, Fountain, and Clement</label><mixed-citation>
Rey, P. F., Fountain, D. M., and Clement, W. P.: P wave velocity across a
noncoaxial ductile shear zone and its associated strain gradient:
Consequences for upper crustal reflectivity, J. Geophys. Res.,
99, 4533–4548, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Rolland et al.(2009)Rolland, Cox, and Corsini</label><mixed-citation>
Rolland, Y., Cox, S. F., and Corsini, M.: Constraining deformation stages in
brittle–ductile shear zones from combined field mapping and 40 Ar/39 Ar
dating: the structural evolution of the Grimsel Pass area (Aar Massif, Swiss
Alps), J. Struct. Geol., 31, 1377–1394, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Rowland and Sibson(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Rowland, J. and Sibson, R.: Structural controls on hydrothermal flow in a
segmented rift system, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand, Geofluids, 4,
259–283, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Schaltegger and Corfu(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaltegger, U. and Corfu, F.: The age and source of late Hercynian
magmatism
in the central Alps: evidence from precise U-Pb ages and initial Hf
isotopes, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 111, 329–344, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Scholz(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Scholz, C.: The brittle-plastic transition and the depth of seismic faulting,
Geol. Rundsch., 77, 319–328, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Sibson(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R. H.: Continental fault structure and the shallow earthquake source,
J. Geol. Soc., 140, 741–767, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page698?><ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Sibson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R. H.: Rupture nucleation on unfavorably oriented faults, B. Seismol.
Soc. Am., 80, 1580–1604, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Sibson(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R. H.: Crustal stress, faulting and fluid flow, Geological Society,
London, Special Publications, 78, 69–84, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Siegesmund et al.(1991)Siegesmund, Kern, and
Vollbrecht</label><mixed-citation>
Siegesmund, S., Kern, H., and Vollbrecht, A.: The effect of oriented
microcracks on seismic velocities in an ultramylonite, Tectonophysics, 186,
241–251, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Smart et al.(2014)Smart, Ofoegbu, Morris, McGinnis, and
Ferrill</label><mixed-citation>
Smart, K. J., Ofoegbu, G. I., Morris, A. P., McGinnis, R. N., and Ferrill,
D. A.: Geomechanical modeling of hydraulic fracturing: Why mechanical
stratigraphy, stress state, and pre-existing structure matter, AAPG Bulletin,
98, 2237–2261, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Sone and Zoback(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Sone, H. and Zoback, M. D.: Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir
rocks – Part 1: Static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy,
Geophysics,
78, D378–D389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/Geo2013-0050.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/Geo2013-0050.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Steck(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
Steck, A.: Die alpidischen Strukturen in den Zentralen Aaregraniten des
westlichen Aarmassivs, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 61, 19–48, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Uehara and Shimamoto(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Uehara, S.-I. and Shimamoto, T.: Gas permeability evolution of cataclasite
and
fault gouge in triaxial compression and implications for changes in
fault-zone permeability structure through the earthquake cycle,
Tectonophysics, 378, 183–195, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Vermilye and Scholz(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Vermilye, J. M. and Scholz, C. H.: A microstructural view of fault growth,
J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12223–12237, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Vidal and Genter(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Vidal, J. and Genter, A.: Overview of naturally permeable fractured
reservoirs
in the central and southern Upper Rhine Graben: Insights from geothermal
wells, Geothermics, 74, 57–73, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Violay et al.(2017)Violay, Heap, Acosta, and Madonna</label><mixed-citation>Violay, M., Heap, M., Acosta, M., and Madonna, C.: Porosity evolution at the
brittle-ductile transition in the continental crust: Implications for deep
hydro-geothermal circulation, Sci. Rep., 7, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08108-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-08108-5</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Watanabe et al.(2017)Watanabe, Numakura, Sakaguchi, Saishu, Okamoto,
Ingebritsen, and Tsuchiya</label><mixed-citation>Watanabe, N., Numakura, T., Sakaguchi, K., Saishu, H., Okamoto, A.,
Ingebritsen, S. E., and Tsuchiya, N.: Potentially exploitable supercritical
geothermal resources in the ductile crust, Nat. Geosci., 10, 140–144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2879" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2879</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Wehrens et al.(2016)Wehrens, Berger, Peters, Spillmann, and
Herwegh</label><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P., Berger, A., Peters, M., Spillmann, T., and Herwegh, M.:
Deformation at the frictional-viscous transition: Evidence for cycles of
fluid-assisted embrittlement and ductile deformation in the granitoid crust,
Tectonophysics, 693, 66–84, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Wehrens et al.(2017)Wehrens, Baumberger, Berger, and
Herwegh</label><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P., Baumberger, R., Berger, A., and Herwegh, M.: How is strain
localized in a meta-granitoid, mid-crustal basement section? Spatial
distribution of deformation in the central Aar massif (Switzerland),
J. Struct. Geol., 94, 47–67, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Wenning, Q. C., Madonna, C., de Haller, A., and Burg, J.-P.: Dataset for “Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a
ductile-brittle fault zone in crystalline rock”, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000245921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3929/ethz-b-000245921</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Wibberley and Shimamoto(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Wibberley, C. A. and Shimamoto, T.: Internal structure and permeability of
major strike-slip fault zones: the Median Tectonic Line in Mie Prefecture,
Southwest Japan, J. Struct. Geol., 25, 59–78, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Wilson et al.(2003)Wilson, Chester, and Chester</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, J., Chester, J., and Chester, F.: Microfracture analysis of fault
growth and wear processes, Punchbowl Fault, San Andreas system, California,
J. Struct. Geol., 25, 1855–1873, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Zappone et al.(2000)Zappone, Fernandez, Garcia-Duenas, and
Burlini</label><mixed-citation>Zappone, A., Fernandez, M., Garcia-Duenas, V., and Burlini, L.: Laboratory
measurements of seismic P-wave velocities on rocks from the Betic chain
(southern Iberian Peninsula), Tectonophysics, 317, 259–272,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00319-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00319-4</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a ductile–brittle fault zone in crystalline rock</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>This study characterizes the elastic and fluid flow properties systematically
across a ductile–brittle fault zone in crystalline rock at the Grimsel Test
Site underground research laboratory. Anisotropic seismic velocities and
permeability measured every 0.1 m in the 0.7 m across the transition zone
from the host Grimsel granodiorite to the mylonitic core show that
foliation-parallel P- and S-wave velocities systematically
increase from the host rock towards the mylonitic core, while permeability is
reduced nearest to the mylonitic core. The results suggest that although
brittle deformation has persisted in the recent evolution, antecedent ductile
fabric continues to control the matrix elastic and fluid flow properties
outside the mylonitic core. The juxtaposition of the ductile strain zone next
to the brittle zone, which is bounded inside the two mylonitic cores, causes
a significant elastic, mechanical, and fluid flow heterogeneity, which has
important implications for crustal deformation and fluid flow and for the exploitation and use of geothermal energy and geologic waste storage. The
results illustrate how physical characteristics of faults in crystalline
rocks change in fault zones during the ductile to brittle transitions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Allen et al.(2017)Allen, Tatham, Faulkner, Mariani, and
Boulton</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, M., Tatham, D., Faulkner, D., Mariani, E., and Boulton, C.:
Permeability
and seismic velocity and their anisotropy across the Alpine Fault, New
Zealand: an insight from laboratory measurements on core from the Deep Fault
Drilling Project phase 1 (DFDP-1), J. Geophys. Res.-Solid
Earth, 122,  6160–6179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014355</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Almqvist and Mainprice(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Almqvist, B. S. and Mainprice, D.: Seismic properties and anisotropy of the
continental crust: Predictions based on mineral texture and rock
microstructure, Rev. Geophys., 55,  367–433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000552</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Amann et al.(2018)Amann, Gischig, Evans, Doetsch, Jalali, Valley,
Krietsch, Dutler, Villiger, Brixel, Klepikova, Kittilä, Madonna, Wiemer,
Saar, Loew, Driesner, Maurer, and Giardini</label><mixed-citation>
Amann, F., Gischig, V., Evans, K., Doetsch, J., Jalali, R., Valley, B.,
Krietsch, H., Dutler, N., Villiger, L., Brixel, B., Klepikova, M., Kittilä,
A., Madonna, C., Wiemer, S., Saar, M. O., Loew, S., Driesner, T., Maurer, H.,
and Giardini, D.: The seismo-hydromechanical behavior during deep geothermal
reservoir stimulations: open questions tackled in a decameter-scale in situ
stimulation experiment, Solid Earth, 9, 115–137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-115-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-115-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Barton et al.(1993)Barton, Larsen, Page, and Howard</label><mixed-citation>
Barton, C. C., Larsen, E., Page, W., and Howard, T.: Characterizing fractured
rock for fluid-flow, geomechanical, and paleostress modeling: Methods and
preliminary results from Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Report, Geological Survey,
Denver, CO, USA, 1–62, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Baud et al.(2005)Baud, Louis, David, Rawling, and Wong</label><mixed-citation>
Baud, P., Louis, L., David, C., Rawling, G. C., and Wong, T.-F.: Effects of
bedding and foliation on mechanical anisotropy, damage evolution and failure
mode, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 245, 223–249, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Belgrano et al.(2016)Belgrano, Herwegh, and Berger</label><mixed-citation>
Belgrano, T. M., Herwegh, M., and Berger, A.: Inherited structural controls
on
fault geometry, architecture and hydrothermal activity: an example from
Grimsel Pass, Switzerland, Swiss J. Geosci., 1–20, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Birch(1960)</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, F.: The Velocity of Compressional Waves in Rocks to 10 Kilobars, Part
1,
J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1083–1102, 1960.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Birch(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, F.: The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars: 2,
J. Geophys. Res., 66, 2199–2224, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bolognesi and Bistacchi(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Bolognesi, F. and Bistacchi, A.: Weakness and mechanical anisotropy of
phyllosilicate-rich cataclasites developed after mylonites of a low-angle
normal fault (Simplon Line, Western Alps), J. Struct. Geol., 83,
1–12, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Brace et al.(1968)Brace, Walsh, and Frangos</label><mixed-citation>
Brace, W., Walsh, J., and Frangos, W.: Permeability of granite under high
pressure, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2225–2236, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Busetti et al.(2014)Busetti, Jiao, and Reches</label><mixed-citation>
Busetti, S., Jiao, W., and Reches, Z.: Geomechanics of hydraulic fracturing
microseismicity: Part 1. Shear, hybrid, and tensile events, AAPG Bulletin,
98, 2439–2457, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Caine et al.(1996)Caine, Evans, and Forster</label><mixed-citation>
Caine, J. S., Evans, J. P., and Forster, C. B.: Fault zone architecture and
permeability structure, Geology, 24, 1025–1028, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Challandes et al.(2008)Challandes, Marquer, and Villa</label><mixed-citation>
Challandes, N., Marquer, D., and Villa, I. M.: PTt modelling, fluid
circulation, and 39 Ar-40 Ar and Rb-Sr mica ages in the Aar Massif shear
zones (Swiss Alps), Swiss J. Geosci., 101, 269–288, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chester and Logan(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Chester, F. and Logan, J.: Implications for mechanical properties of brittle
faults from observations of the Punchbowl fault zone, California,
Pure Appl. Geophys., 124, 79–106, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>David and Wassermann(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
David, C. and Wassermann, J.: The KG2B Project: A World-Wide Benchmark of Low
Permeability Measurement, Poromechanics VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Biot Conference on Poromechanics, 1153–1161, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dicker and Smits(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Dicker, A. and Smits, R.: A practical approach for determining permeability
from laboratory pressure-pulse decay measurements, in: International meeting
on petroleum engineering, Soc. Petrol. Eng J., SPE 17578, 285–292, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Donath(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Donath, F. A.: Experimental study of shear failure in anisotropic rocks,
Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 72, 985–989, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Etheridge et al.(1983)Etheridge, Wall, and Vernon</label><mixed-citation>
Etheridge, M., Wall, V., and Vernon, R.: The role of the fluid phase during
regional metamorphism and deformation, J. Metamorph. Geol., 1,
205–226, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Faulkner and Armitage(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D. and Armitage, P.: The effect of tectonic environment on
permeability development around faults and in the brittle crust, Earth
Planet. Sci. Lett., 375, 71–77, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Faulkner and Rutter(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D. and Rutter, E.: The gas permeability of clay-bearing fault gouge
at 20 °C, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 147, 147–156,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Faulkner et al.(2003)Faulkner, Lewis, and Rutter</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D., Lewis, A., and Rutter, E.: On the internal structure and
mechanics of large strike-slip fault zones: field observations of the
Carboneras fault in southeastern Spain, Tectonophysics, 367, 235–251, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Faulkner et al.(2006)Faulkner, Mitchell, Healy, and
Heap</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D., Mitchell, T., Healy, D., and Heap, M.: Slip on `weak' faults by
the rotation of regional stress in the fracture damage zone, Nature, 444,
922–925, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Faulkner et al.(2010)Faulkner, Jackson, Lunn, Schlische, Shipton,
Wibberley, and Withjack</label><mixed-citation>
Faulkner, D., Jackson, C., Lunn, R., Schlische, R., Shipton, Z., Wibberley,
C.,
and Withjack, M.: A review of recent developments concerning the structure,
mechanics and fluid flow properties of fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 32, 1557–1575, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Fountain et al.(1984)Fountain, Hurich, and Smithson</label><mixed-citation>
Fountain, D. M., Hurich, C. A., and Smithson, S. B.: Seismic reflectivity of
mylonite zones in the crust, Geology, 12, 195–198, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Griffiths et al.(2017)Griffiths, Heap, Xu, Chen, and
Baud</label><mixed-citation>
Griffiths, L., Heap, M. J., Xu, T., Chen, C.-f., and Baud, P.: The influence
of
pore geometry and orientation on the strength and stiffness of porous rock,
J. Struct. Geol., 96, 149–160, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Griffiths et al.(2018)Griffiths, Lengliné, Heap, Baud, and
Schmittbuhl</label><mixed-citation>
Griffiths, L., Lengliné, O., Heap, M., Baud, P., and Schmittbuhl, J.:
Thermal
cracking in Westerly Granite monitored using direct wave velocity, coda wave
interferometry, and acoustic emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 123, 2246–2261, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Géraud et al.(1995)Géraud, Caron, and Faure</label><mixed-citation>
Géraud, Y., Caron, J.-M., and Faure, P.: Porosity network of a ductile
shear
zone, J. Struct. Geol., 17, 1757–1769, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hsieh et al.(1981)Hsieh, Tracy, Neuzil, Bredehoeft, and
Silliman</label><mixed-citation>
Hsieh, P., Tracy, J., Neuzil, C., Bredehoeft, J., and Silliman, S.: A
transient
laboratory method for determining the hydraulic properties of
`rocks' – I. Theory, in: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and
Mining Sciences &amp; Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 18,  245–252, Elsevier,
1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Hudson et al.(2011)Hudson, Cosgrove, Kemppainen, and
Johansson</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, J. A., Cosgrove, J. W., Kemppainen, K., and Johansson, E.: Faults in
crystalline rock and the estimation of their mechanical properties at the
Olkiluoto site, western Finland, Eng. Geol., 117, 246–258, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Jalali et al.(2017)Jalali, Gischig, Doetsch, Krietsch, Amann, and
Klepikova</label><mixed-citation>
Jalali, M., Gischig, V., Doetsch, J., Krietsch, H., Amann, F., and Klepikova,
M.: Mechanical, Hydraulic and Seismological Behavior of Crystalline Rock as a
Response to Hydraulic Fracturing at the Grimsel Test Site, in: Proceedings of
51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, USA, ARMA 17-0962, 1–9, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jefferies et al.(2006)Jefferies, Holdsworth, Wibberley, Shimamoto,
Spiers, Niemeijer, and Lloyd</label><mixed-citation>
Jefferies, S., Holdsworth, R., Wibberley, C., Shimamoto, T., Spiers, C.,
Niemeijer, A., and Lloyd, G.: The nature and importance of phyllonite
development in crustal-scale fault cores: an example from the Median Tectonic
Line, Japan, J. Struct. Geol., 28, 220–235, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Jones and Nur(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, T. and Nur, A.: Seismic velocity and anisotropy in mylonites and the
reflectivity of deep crystal fault zones, Geology, 10, 260–263, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Jones and Nur(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, T. and Nur, A.: The Nature of Seismic Reflections From Deep Crustal
Fault Zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3153–3171, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kern and Wenk(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Kern, H. and Wenk, H.-R.: Fabric-Related Velocity Anisotropy and Shear Wave
Splitting in Rocks From the Santa Rosa Mylonite Zone, California,
J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11213–11223, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Keusen et al.(1989)Keusen, Ganguin, Schuler, Buletti, and
Geotest</label><mixed-citation>
Keusen, H., Ganguin, J., Schuler, P., Buletti, M., and Geotest: Grimsel Test
Site: Geology, Report, 1–166, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Klinkenberg(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Klinkenberg, L.: The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases, in:
Drilling and production practice, American Petroleum Institute, 200–213, 1941.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Krietsch et al.(2017)Krietsch, Gischig, Jalali, Amann, Evans,
Doetsch, and Valley</label><mixed-citation>
Krietsch, H., Gischig, V., Jalali, M., Amann, F., Evans, K., Doetsch, J., and
Valley, B.: Stress measurements in crystalline rock: Comparison of
overcoring, hydraulic fracturing and induced seismicity results, in:
Proceedings of 51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, USA, ARMA-17-0733, 1–8, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Leclère et al.(2015)Leclère, Cappa, Faulkner, Fabbri, Armitage, and
Blake</label><mixed-citation>
Leclère, H., Cappa, F., Faulkner, D., Fabbri, O., Armitage, P., and
Blake, O.:
Development and maintenance of fluid overpressures in crustal fault zones by
elastic compaction and implications for earthquake swarms, J. Geophys.
Res.-Solid Earth, 120, 4450–4473, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lloyd et al.(2011a)Lloyd, Butler, Casey, Tatham, and
Mainprice</label><mixed-citation>
Lloyd, G., Butler, R., Casey, M., Tatham, D., and Mainprice, D.: Constraints
on
the seismic properties of the middle and lower continental crust, Geological
Society, London, Special Publications, 360, 7–32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP360.2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP360.2</a>, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Lloyd et al.(2011b)Lloyd, Halliday, Butler, Casey,
Kendall, Wookey, and Mainprice</label><mixed-citation>
Lloyd, G., Halliday, J., Butler, R., Casey, M., Kendall, J., Wookey, J., and
Mainprice, D.: From crystal to crustal: petrofabric-derived seismic modelling
of regional tectonics, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 360,
49–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/SP360.4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/SP360.4</a>, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mainprice(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Mainprice, D.: Seismic Anisotropy of the Deep Earth from a Mineral and Rock
Physics Perspective, Treatise in Geophysics – Volume 2 Mineral Physics, 437–482, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Mancktelow et al.(1998)Mancktelow, Grujic, and
Johnson</label><mixed-citation>
Mancktelow, N. S., Grujic, D., and Johnson, E. L.: An SEM study of porosity
and
grain boundary microstructure in quartz mylonites, Simplon Fault Zone,
Central Alps, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 131, 71–85, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Marquer and Burkhard(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Marquer, D. and Burkhard, M.: Fluid circulation, progressive deformation and
mass-transfer processes in the upper crust: the example of basement-cover
relationships in the External Crystalline Massifs, Switzerland,
J. Struct. Geol., 14, 1047–1057, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Mavko et al.(2009)Mavko, Mukerji, and Dvorkin</label><mixed-citation>
Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J.: Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for
Seismic Analysis of Porous Media, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press,
p. 524, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Mitchell and Faulkner(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. and Faulkner, D.: The nature and origin of off-fault damage
surrounding strike-slip fault zones with a wide range of displacements: a
field study from the Atacama fault system, northern Chile, J. Struct. Geol., 31, 802–816, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Mitchell and Faulkner(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, T. and Faulkner, D.: Towards quantifying the matrix permeability of
fault damage zones in low porosity rocks, Earth  Planet. Sci.
Lett., 339, 24–31, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Morrow et al.(1994)Morrow, Lockner, Hickman, Rusanov, and
Röckel</label><mixed-citation>
Morrow, C., Lockner, D., Hickman, S., Rusanov, M., and Röckel, T.: Effects
of
lithology and depth on the permeability of core samples from the Kola and KTB
drill holes, J. Geophys., 99, 7263–7274, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>NIST(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
NIST: <a href="http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/" target="_blank">http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/</a> (last access: 30 June 2017), National
Institute of Standards and Technology, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Nur and Simmons(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
Nur, A. and Simmons, G.: The effect of saturation on velocity in low porosity
rocks, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 7, 183–193, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Pini et al.(2009)Pini, Ottiger, Burlini, Storti, and
Mazzotti</label><mixed-citation>
Pini, R., Ottiger, S., Burlini, L., Storti, G., and Mazzotti, M.: Role of
adsorption and swelling on the dynamics of gas injection in coal, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 114,   1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005961" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005961</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Rawling et al.(2002)Rawling, Baud, and Wong</label><mixed-citation>
Rawling, G. C., Baud, P., and Wong, T.: Dilatancy, brittle strength, and
anisotropy of foliated rocks: Experimental deformation and micromechanical
modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 107,  1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000472</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Rey et al.(1994)Rey, Fountain, and Clement</label><mixed-citation>
Rey, P. F., Fountain, D. M., and Clement, W. P.: P wave velocity across a
noncoaxial ductile shear zone and its associated strain gradient:
Consequences for upper crustal reflectivity, J. Geophys. Res.,
99, 4533–4548, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Rolland et al.(2009)Rolland, Cox, and Corsini</label><mixed-citation>
Rolland, Y., Cox, S. F., and Corsini, M.: Constraining deformation stages in
brittle–ductile shear zones from combined field mapping and 40 Ar/39 Ar
dating: the structural evolution of the Grimsel Pass area (Aar Massif, Swiss
Alps), J. Struct. Geol., 31, 1377–1394, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Rowland and Sibson(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Rowland, J. and Sibson, R.: Structural controls on hydrothermal flow in a
segmented rift system, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand, Geofluids, 4,
259–283, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Schaltegger and Corfu(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaltegger, U. and Corfu, F.: The age and source of late Hercynian
magmatism
in the central Alps: evidence from precise U-Pb ages and initial Hf
isotopes, Contrib. Mineral. Petr., 111, 329–344, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Scholz(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Scholz, C.: The brittle-plastic transition and the depth of seismic faulting,
Geol. Rundsch., 77, 319–328, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Sibson(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R. H.: Continental fault structure and the shallow earthquake source,
J. Geol. Soc., 140, 741–767, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Sibson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R. H.: Rupture nucleation on unfavorably oriented faults, B. Seismol.
Soc. Am., 80, 1580–1604, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Sibson(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Sibson, R. H.: Crustal stress, faulting and fluid flow, Geological Society,
London, Special Publications, 78, 69–84, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Siegesmund et al.(1991)Siegesmund, Kern, and
Vollbrecht</label><mixed-citation>
Siegesmund, S., Kern, H., and Vollbrecht, A.: The effect of oriented
microcracks on seismic velocities in an ultramylonite, Tectonophysics, 186,
241–251, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Smart et al.(2014)Smart, Ofoegbu, Morris, McGinnis, and
Ferrill</label><mixed-citation>
Smart, K. J., Ofoegbu, G. I., Morris, A. P., McGinnis, R. N., and Ferrill,
D. A.: Geomechanical modeling of hydraulic fracturing: Why mechanical
stratigraphy, stress state, and pre-existing structure matter, AAPG Bulletin,
98, 2237–2261, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Sone and Zoback(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Sone, H. and Zoback, M. D.: Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir
rocks – Part 1: Static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy,
Geophysics,
78, D378–D389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/Geo2013-0050.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/Geo2013-0050.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Steck(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
Steck, A.: Die alpidischen Strukturen in den Zentralen Aaregraniten des
westlichen Aarmassivs, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 61, 19–48, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Uehara and Shimamoto(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Uehara, S.-I. and Shimamoto, T.: Gas permeability evolution of cataclasite
and
fault gouge in triaxial compression and implications for changes in
fault-zone permeability structure through the earthquake cycle,
Tectonophysics, 378, 183–195, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Vermilye and Scholz(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Vermilye, J. M. and Scholz, C. H.: A microstructural view of fault growth,
J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12223–12237, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Vidal and Genter(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Vidal, J. and Genter, A.: Overview of naturally permeable fractured
reservoirs
in the central and southern Upper Rhine Graben: Insights from geothermal
wells, Geothermics, 74, 57–73, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Violay et al.(2017)Violay, Heap, Acosta, and Madonna</label><mixed-citation>
Violay, M., Heap, M., Acosta, M., and Madonna, C.: Porosity evolution at the
brittle-ductile transition in the continental crust: Implications for deep
hydro-geothermal circulation, Sci. Rep., 7, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08108-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08108-5</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Watanabe et al.(2017)Watanabe, Numakura, Sakaguchi, Saishu, Okamoto,
Ingebritsen, and Tsuchiya</label><mixed-citation>
Watanabe, N., Numakura, T., Sakaguchi, K., Saishu, H., Okamoto, A.,
Ingebritsen, S. E., and Tsuchiya, N.: Potentially exploitable supercritical
geothermal resources in the ductile crust, Nat. Geosci., 10, 140–144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2879" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2879</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Wehrens et al.(2016)Wehrens, Berger, Peters, Spillmann, and
Herwegh</label><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P., Berger, A., Peters, M., Spillmann, T., and Herwegh, M.:
Deformation at the frictional-viscous transition: Evidence for cycles of
fluid-assisted embrittlement and ductile deformation in the granitoid crust,
Tectonophysics, 693, 66–84, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Wehrens et al.(2017)Wehrens, Baumberger, Berger, and
Herwegh</label><mixed-citation>
Wehrens, P., Baumberger, R., Berger, A., and Herwegh, M.: How is strain
localized in a meta-granitoid, mid-crustal basement section? Spatial
distribution of deformation in the central Aar massif (Switzerland),
J. Struct. Geol., 94, 47–67, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Wenning, Q. C., Madonna, C., de Haller, A., and Burg, J.-P.: Dataset for “Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a
ductile-brittle fault zone in crystalline rock”, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000245921" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000245921</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Wibberley and Shimamoto(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Wibberley, C. A. and Shimamoto, T.: Internal structure and permeability of
major strike-slip fault zones: the Median Tectonic Line in Mie Prefecture,
Southwest Japan, J. Struct. Geol., 25, 59–78, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Wilson et al.(2003)Wilson, Chester, and Chester</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, J., Chester, J., and Chester, F.: Microfracture analysis of fault
growth and wear processes, Punchbowl Fault, San Andreas system, California,
J. Struct. Geol., 25, 1855–1873, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Zappone et al.(2000)Zappone, Fernandez, Garcia-Duenas, and
Burlini</label><mixed-citation>
Zappone, A., Fernandez, M., Garcia-Duenas, V., and Burlini, L.: Laboratory
measurements of seismic P-wave velocities on rocks from the Betic chain
(southern Iberian Peninsula), Tectonophysics, 317, 259–272,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00319-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00319-4</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
