<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Solid Earth</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SE</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1869-9529</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-9-699-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Squirt flow due to interfacial water films in hydrate<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> bearing sediments</article-title><alt-title>Squirt flow due to interfacial water films in hydrate bearing sediments</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Squirt flow due to interfacial water films in hydrate bearing sediments}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K.~Sell et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sell</surname><given-names>Kathleen</given-names></name>
          <email>sell@uni-mainz.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Quintal</surname><given-names>Beatriz</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6714-420X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kersten</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6385-7031</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Saenger</surname><given-names>Erik H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2057-4728</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Geothermal Resource Management, Bingen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>International Geothermal Centre, Bochum University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kathleen Sell (sell@uni-mainz.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>699</fpage><lpage>711</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e137">Sediments
containing gas hydrate dispersed in the pore space are known to show
a characteristic seismic anomaly which is a high attenuation along with
increasing seismic velocities. Currently, this observation cannot be fully
explained albeit squirt-flow type mechanisms on the microscale have been
speculated to be the cause. Recent major findings from in situ experiments,
using the “gas in excess” and “water in excess” formation method, and coupled
with high-resolution synchrotron-based X-ray micro-tomography, have revealed
the systematic presence of thin water films between the quartz grains and the
encrusting hydrate. The data obtained from these experiments underwent an
image processing procedure to quantify the thicknesses and geometries of the
aforementioned interfacial water films. Overall, the water films vary from
sub-micrometer to a few micrometers in thickness. In addition, some of
the water films interconnect through water bridges. This geometrical analysis
is used to propose a new conceptual squirt flow model for hydrate bearing
sediments. A series of numerical simulations is performed considering
variations of the proposed model to study seismic attenuation caused by such
thin water films. Our results support previous speculation that squirt flow
can explain high attenuation at seismic frequencies in hydrate bearing
sediments, but based on a conceptual squirt flow model which is geometrically
different than those previously considered.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e149">Important mechanisms of wave attenuation in fluid-saturated
porous media from seismic to ultrasonic frequencies, include friction between
grain boundaries (Winkler and Nur, 1982), global flow or Biot's mechanism
(Biot, 1962), and wave-induced fluid flow at mesoscopic and microscopic
scales (e.g., Müller et al., 2010). At the mesoscopic scale, patchy
saturation and fractures are the most prominent causes of wave-induced fluid
flow (White, 1975; White et al., 1975; Brajanovski et al., 2005; Tisato and
Quintal, 2013; Quintal et al., 2014). At the microscopic scale, wave-induced
fluid flow is commonly referred to as squirt flow and typically occurs
between interconnected microcracks or between grain contacts and stiffer
pores (O'Connell and Budiansky, 1977; Murphy et al., 1986; Mavko and Jizba,
1991; Sams et al., 1997; Adelinet et al., 2010; Gurevich et al., 2010). The
attenuation caused by global flow as well as that caused by wave-induced
fluid flow at microscopic or mesoscopic scales are frequency dependent. While
the latter can have a strong effect at seismic frequencies (Pimienta et al.,
2015; Subramaniyan et al., 2015; Chapman et al., 2016), global flow will only
cause significant attenuation in reservoir rocks at ultrasonic frequencies or
higher (e.g., Bourbie et al., 1987). The attenuation caused by friction between
grain boundaries is, however, frequency independent and basically
depends on the confining pressure and the strain imposed by the propagating
wave (Winkler and Nur, 1982). Its effect is expected to be small for the
correspondingly small strains caused by seismic waves used in exploration and
reservoir geophysics.<?pagebreak page700?> Furthermore, the attenuation caused by wave-induced
fluid flow tends to be linearly superposed to that due to friction between
grain boundaries, as shown by Tisato and Quintal (2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e152">Gas hydrates (GH) are ice-like structures comprised of gas molecules
entrapped by water molecules (Sloan and Koh, 2008). The widespread global
occurrence of GH and the fact that 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of GH contains up to
164 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of natural gas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at standard
conditions) draws attention to the idea of using GH as a potential future
energy resource (Schicks et al., 2011). Nevertheless, GH-bearing sediments
have been discussed not only as a relatively clean hydrocarbon reservoir
(Collett and Ladd, 2000), but also as a geohazard that could
potentially contribute to global warming associated with hydrate dissociation
and the subsequent destabilization of GH-cemented deep sea sediments at
continental margins (Kvenvolden, 1993; Nixon and Grozic, 2007). Occurrences
of GH are restricted to locations providing the required amount of gas and
water and the preferred pressure-temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) conditions, which are
commonly referred to as gas hydrate stability zones. Usually,
GH reservoirs are mainly limited to marine continental margins, deep lakes
and permafrost regions (Bohrmann and Torres, 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e211">In the search for GH reservoirs, the attenuation of seismic waves caused by
the pore fluids might be an important survey tool (e.g., Bellefleur
et al., 2007). However, little effort has been directed toward studying its
effects for unconsolidated sediments hosting GH in a rather dispersed manner.
GH forming in the pore space of unconsolidated sediments at given
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions alters the effective elastic and effective transport
properties of the hosting sediment. It is known that the presence of GH in
the sediment not only reduces the porosity and causes significant changes in
its permeability, but also results in higher P and S wave velocities due to
stiffening of the hosting matrix (Dvorkin et al., 2003; Guerin and Goldberg,
2005; Yun et al., 2005; Priest et al., 2006; Waite et al., 2009). In other
words, the bulk and shear moduli increase due to the GH matrix-supporting
effect within the sedimentary frame (Ecker et al., 1998). Additionally, the
presence of GH causes higher attenuation of the seismic waves (Bellefleur
et al., 2007; Dewangan et al., 2014) which was in particularly observed for
sediments containing dispersed GH in the pore space (Guerin and Goldberg,
2002; Dvorkin and Uden, 2004). This anomalous seismic behavior in terms of
increased attenuation and velocities (Guerin and Goldberg, 2002; Dvorkin and
Uden, 2004) cannot be fully explained, although wave-induced fluid flow at
the microscopic and mesoscopic scales has been speculated to cause them
(Priest et al., 2006; Gerner et al., 2007). Gerner et al. (2007) conducted
numerical P wave velocity simulations in highly permeable sedimentary layers,
similar to hydrate-bearing sediments, and identified interlayer flow at the
mesoscopic scale (White et al., 1975) as a potential mechanism of
attenuation. Other authors have considered classical squirt flow models
(O'Connell and Budiansky, 1977; Murphy et al., 1986) as the main source of
attenuation in hydrate-bearing sediments (Dvorkin and Uden, 2004; Guerin and
Goldberg, 2005; Priest et al., 2006; Waite et al., 2009; Marin-Moreno et al.,
2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e228">Review of the established conceptual
models (grains are grey and GH are orange), with <bold>(a)</bold> cementation –
GH cements the grains; <bold>(b)</bold> encrustation – GH coats the grains;
<bold>(c)</bold> matrix-supporting – GH is part of the sediment matrix; and
<bold>(d)</bold> pore-filling – GH employs the pore space forming crystallites
of varying size (modified after Dai et al., 2004).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e250">Quantifying GH saturation levels through geophysical exploration techniques
is, however, not straightforward as there are still open questions on GH
formation, its microstructure, and its distribution in the natural settings.
Additionally, the recovery of unaltered natural GH samples is hampered due to
their fast decomposition under ambient conditions. Therefore, various
researchers have attempted to mimic the natural environment of GH-bearing
sedimentary matrices in laboratory experiments (Berge et al., 1999; Ecker
et al., 2000; Dvorkin et al., 2003; Yun et al., 2005; Spangenberg and
Kulenkampff, 2006; Priest et al., 2006, 2009; Best et al., 2010, 2013; Hu
et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011; Dai et al., 2012; Schicks
et al., 2013). The results of this collective effort established a number of
conceptual models for the role of GH embedded in its sedimentary matrix
(Fig. 1). Nevertheless, these approximations are currently unsatisfactory.
Although it has been suggested that all hydrate habits known
from laboratory investigations involving synthetic samples also occur in
nature (Spangenberg et al., 2015), none of those simplified models can yield
accurate predictions of GH saturations from field electric resistivity or
seismic data alone (Waite et al., 2009; Dai et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e253">Chaouachi et al. (2015) performed in situ experiments based on different
formation mechanisms, including the “water in excess” and the “gas in
excess” methods, to form gas hydrates in various sedimentary matrices. The
in situ experiments coupled with high-resolution synchrotron-based X-ray
micro-tomography (SRXCT) yielded 3-D images of sub-micrometer spatial
resolution. Using the “gas in excess”<?pagebreak page701?> method, the water present in the
samples weds the grain surfaces and transforms into GH at the required
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. When hydrate is formed with the “water in
excess method” the grains will also be water wet, but these very thin
(sub-micron) hydrate films between the grains and the hydrate structure will
only occur at very high GH saturations. The resulting 3-D micro-tomography
data revealed the systematic presence of interfacial water films between the
pore-filling GH and the grains, independent of which formation method was
used (“gas in excess” or “water in excess”). The observed interfacial
water films are occasionally interconnected via water bridges but water
pockets are also embedded in the GH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e270"><bold>(a)</bold> Overview of an unfiltered
2-D slice in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction of quartz sand containing GH. Note that due
to its unfiltered state this image contains artifacts, such as streaks and
slight edge enhancement. Phases can be identified based on grey scale
differences.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e295">For this study, the SRXCT data presented by Chaouachi et al. (2015) underwent
an image processing workflow in order to quantify the thicknesses of the thin
interfacial water films. Based on the obtained results, we introduce
a conceptual model for GH-bearing sediments to numerically study squirt flow.
Our numerical simulations allow for the dispersion of the P wave modulus and
the frequency-dependent P wave attenuation. The results demonstrate the high
levels of seismic attenuation/dispersion that a range of variations of our
conceptual model can cause. Additionally, our results support the suggestions
that the estimation of GH saturation for GH occurring in a rather dispersed
manner could be accomplished by using seismic wave attenuation as a tool for
indirect geophysical quantification (Guerin and Goldberg, 2002; Priest
et al., 2006; Best et al., 2013; Marin-Moreno et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>The interfacial water films</title>
      <p id="d1e304">Chaouachi et al. (2015) conducted various in situ experiments coupled with
synchrotron-based tomography at the TOMCAT beamline of the Paul Scherrer
Institute in Villigen, Switzerland. The aim was to study the formation
process and distribution of gas hydrates in various matrices, such as pure
quartz sand and glass beads, as well as mixtures of quartz sand with clay
minerals. These in situ experiments were conducted using an experimental
setup that allowed for high pressures and low temperatures. Further details
are given by Chaouachi et al. (2015), Falenty et al. (2015), and Sell
et al. (2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e309">Raw (unfiltered) 2-D image in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction at a spatial resolution of 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The zoom depicts the
measurement of a thin interfacial water film varying in thickness from 0.49
to 1.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e349">For this study, the SRXCT data obtained from the abovementioned in situ
experiments focused on samples containing pure natural quartz sand sieved at
a 200–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grain size. Chuvilin et al. (2011) provides details
on the sedimentology and mineralogy of the host sediment. We use
a reconstruction process (Marone and Stampanoni, 2012) that yields an image
matrix of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2560</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2560</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2160</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> voxels, with isometric voxel sizes
of 0.74 and 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 10 fold and 20 fold optical magnification,
respectively. The reconstructed tomograms revealed discernible grey value
differences between the three relevant phases of the sample: solid grains,
hydrate, and water (Fig. 2). To reduce image artifacts, such as inhomogeneity
in grey scale values, streaks and edge enhancement, we apply a systematic
image enhancement workflow comprising different image filter combinations in
2-D and 3-D (Sell et al., 2016). Chaouachi et al. (2015) observed
the systematic appearance of an interfacial water film separating the quartz
grains from the GH phase in samples where GH was formed directly from the
juvenile state not involving GH dissociation, as well as where GH was formed
from the “gas in excess method”. This observation is in accordance with the
publication from Tohidi et al. (2001). Additionally several molecular numerical
simulations showed that water layers prefer the interface of GH and quartz
grains (Bagherzadeh et al., 2012; Bai et al., 2011; Liang et al., 2011).
Identifying the water films and quantifying their thickness was one scope of
this study to adapt our conceptual model.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e391">Volume-rendered phases in
a representative image sample. For a better visualization the phases are
introduced step-by-step, with <bold>(a)</bold> grains (grey), <bold>(b)</bold> grains
and interfacial water films (blue), and <bold>(c)</bold> grains, water film and
hydrate (yellow). A zoom in <bold>(b)</bold> shows an interfacial water film
measured at 1–4 voxels equivalent to 0.38–1.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thickness,
respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f04.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e422">The broad range of grey scale values of the filtered images were classified
using watershed segmentation combined with region growing tools from the
Avizo Fire 7 (FEI, France) and Fiji software packages. In the present
study, we determined the thickness variation and geometry of the water film
(Fig. 3). Following the image enhancement and segmentation process described
by Sell et al. (2016), the segmented data illustrate the characteristics and
appearance of the phases distributed in the samples (Fig. 4). Moreover, the
high resolution of the data enables us to obtain 3-D images in which
particular details, such as water bridges connecting two interfacial water
films, are detectable (Fig. 5). With information collected from the 3-D data,
our proposed conceptual model involves spherical grains covered by
a homogenous water film which is, in turn, embedded in non-porous hydrate. The
conceptual model can be adjusted to include water bridges connecting the
water films (Fig. 6) and/or isolated water pockets within the hydrate and
separated from the water films.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e427">Volume-rendered image of a representative
region of interest (ROI) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> voxels at
0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution. The zoom-in depicts quartz grains
fully separated from the pore-filling hydrate by thin interfacial water
films, with two quartz grains having their water films interconnected by
a water bridge.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e464">Schemes of <bold>(a)</bold> a new concept
model for GH encrusting quartz grains separated by a thin interfacial water
film and <bold>(b)</bold> connected by a water bridge.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Numerical methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Mathematical formulation</title>
      <?pagebreak page702?><p id="d1e490">To estimate frequency-dependent attenuation in the GH systems described above
we employ a hydromechanical approach (Quintal et al., 2016) based on the
conservation of momentum.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with the components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the stress tensor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> defined
according to the general stress–strain relations in the frequency domain:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M23" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the components of the strain tensor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
denotes the cubical dilatation given by the trace of the strain tensor,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the angular frequency, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the unit imaginary
number. The indexes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2, 3 refer to the three Cartesian
directions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the Kronecker delta (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The material parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the shear
modulus, the bulk modulus, and the shear viscosity, respectively.</p>
      <?pagebreak page703?><p id="d1e843">Using this general mathematical formulation (Eqs. 1 and 2), a heterogeneous
medium can be described as having an isotropic, linear elastic solid frame
and fluid-filled cavities or pores, to which a specific choice of material
parameters can be assigned. Equation (2) reduces to Hooke's law by setting
the shear viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to zero in the solid domains. In these regions,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the shear and bulk moduli of the corresponding elastic
solid. In the fluid-filled domains, the shear modulus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to zero
while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the bulk modulus and shear viscosity of the
fluid. In these domains the combined Eqs. (1) and (2) reduce to the
quasi-static, linearized Navier–Stokes' equations for the laminar flow of
a Newtonian fluid (e.g., Jaeger et al., 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e889">When the aforementioned heterogeneous medium is deformed, fluid pressure
differences between neighbor regions induce fluid flow or, more accurately,
fluid pressure diffusion, which in turn results in energy loss caused by
viscous dissipation (Quintal et al., 2016). At the microscopic scale, this
attenuation mechanism is commonly referred to as squirt flow (e.g., O'Connell
and Budiansky, 1977; Murphy et al., 1986) and is the sole cause of
attenuation in our simulations, as we neglect the inertial terms in
Eqs. (1) and (2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Finite element modeling</title>
      <p id="d1e898">Our 2-D problem is equivalent to a 3-D case under plain strain conditions,
which means no strain outside the modeling plane is allowed to develop. For
the corresponding simulations, we consider the directions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, to be
in the modeling plane and direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be the direction in which no
displacement or displacement gradients can occur.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e924">Fundamental block of an idealized
periodic medium representing sediment grains which are separated from the
embedding GH background by a thin interfacial water film.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e935">The triangular mesh used for the
numerical model shown in Fig. 7. To distinguish between the phases: quartz is
denoted with #1, GH is denoted with #2, and the interfacial water film
is depicted in light blue.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e945"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The numerical solution is based on a finite-element approach in the frequency
domain. We employ an unstructured triangular mesh which allows for an
efficient discretization of slender heterogeneities having large aspect
ratios, such as the thin interfacial water films, by strongly varying the
sizes of the triangular elements (e.g., Quintal et al., 2014). A few elements
across the thin interfacial water film are necessary to accurately capture
the viscous dissipation in this region, while much larger elements are
sufficient in the solid elastic domains. The sizes of smallest and largest
elements in our meshes differ by three orders of magnitude.</p>
      <p id="d1e949">To assess the P wave attenuation and modulus dispersion caused by
squirt flow, we subject a rectangular numerical model to an oscillatory test.
A sinusoidal downward displacement is applied homogeneously at the top
boundary of the numerical model. At the bottom, the displacement in the (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
vertical direction is set to zero. At the lateral boundaries of the model,
the displacement in the (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) horizontal direction is set to zero. From this
test we obtain the stress and strain fields, averaged over the entire model
domain. The mean stress and strain are used to compute the complex-valued and
frequency-dependent P wave modulus corresponding to a wave propagating in the
vertical direction. The real part of the P wave modulus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is used to
illustrate the P wave modulus dispersion while the ratio between its
imaginary and real parts is used to quantify the P wave attenuation
(1/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The S wave attenuation and dispersion can be evaluated in
a similar manner by changing the boundary conditions to those of
a simple shear test (e.g., Quintal et al., 2012, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e984">Similar to the 2-D problem, the solution to our 3-D problem is based on the
application of an unstructured mesh with tetrahedral elements. The element
sizes in our 3-D meshes also vary by about three orders of magnitude.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Numerical results</title>
      <p id="d1e995">Many sources of squirt flow might coexist in unconsolidated sediments hosting
GH, such as those resembling the conventional squirt flow models introduced
by O'Connell and Budiansky (1977) for interconnected microcracks and by
Murphy et al. (1986) for microcracks or grain contacts connected to spherical
pores. Marin-Moreno et al. (2017) describes an integrated approach that
combines the effects of some squirt flow models and other attenuation
mechanisms. Here our objective diverges from that. We instead aim at studying
the squirt flow phenomenon and the resulting frequency-dependent attenuation
associated with a specific model, which is geometrically different from the
previously mentioned conventional squirt flow models and is based on the thin
interfacial water films. We thus neglect all other potential sources of
attenuation.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e1001">Material properties used in the numerical simulations. The
properties of quartz are based on the work of Bass (1995) and those
of hydrate on Helgerud (2003).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Material parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quartz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Hydrate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Water</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shear modulus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.3 GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.57 GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bulk modulus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37.8 GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.76 GPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.4 GPa</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shear viscosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page704?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Attenuation mechanism in a thin interfacial water film</title>
      <p id="d1e1122">Our 2-D numerical model domain corresponds to a fundamental block of
a periodic distribution of unconsolidated circular quartz grains dispersed in
a continuous GH background and separated from the latter by a thin
interfacial water film (Fig. 7). The subdomain representing the thin
interfacial water film is described by the corresponding properties of this
viscous fluid, while the other subdomains are described by properties of two
different elastic solids (quartz and GH). These properties are given in
Table 1 and the numerical mesh is shown in Fig. 8. We consider thicknesses of
the interfacial water film ranging from 0.1 to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as
two grain diameters 150 and 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2-D model. These
values were chosen considering the sizes of the quartz grains used in the
laboratory experiment from which the SRXCT data were obtained, which ranged
from 150 to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the thicknesses of the interfacial water
films observed in the data, ranging from 0.38 to 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note
that the thinnest interfacial water films observed were limited by the
highest achieved spatial resolution of 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Despite this
limitation, water film thicknesses below 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have also been
considered for our numerical analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1188">Real part of P wave modulus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
corresponding P wave attenuation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as functions of frequency for
the model shown in Fig. 7, considering the grain diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the interfacial water film, which are indicated in the
legends and plot titles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e1235">Fluid pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the model shown in
Fig. 7, considering a grain diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thickness of
the interfacial water film <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The oscillation frequency
is equal to the characteristic frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1314">Zoom-in of the top right quadrant of the
model shown in Fig. 9 displaying the fluid velocity components (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for a grain diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a thickness of the
interfacial water film <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at the characteristic
frequency. These fields correspond to the fluid pressure field shown in
Fig. 10. The insets illustrate the profiles across the interfacial film where
it is crossed by a black line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p id="d1e1392">Zoom-in of the top right quadrant of the
model shown in Fig. 7 showing the local attenuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for a grain
diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a water film thickness
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at the characteristic frequency. This field
corresponds to those shown in Figs. 10 and 11. The inset illustrates the
profile across the interfacial film where it is crossed by a black line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p id="d1e1459">Fundamental blocks of two periodic media
representing loose sandstone grains which are separated from the embedding GH
background by a thin interfacial water film. In <bold>(a)</bold> water pockets
are located in the GH background and in <bold>(b)</bold> the interfacial water
films are connected to another through a water bridge.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1476">Real part of P wave modulus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
corresponding P wave attenuation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as functions of frequency, for
the models shown in Fig. 13 in comparison with the corresponding results from
the model shown in Fig. 7 and given in Fig. 9. The grain diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the interfacial water film are indicated in the plot titles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><caption><p id="d1e1524">The 3-D counterpart of the model shown in
Fig. 7: a fundamental block of a periodic medium representing unconsolidated
quartz grains which are separated from the embedding GH background by a thin
interfacial water film.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><caption><p id="d1e1535">Real part of P wave modulus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
corresponding P wave attenuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as functions of frequency, for
the 2-D model shown in Fig. 7 and for its 3-D counterpart shown in Fig. 15.
The grain diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and thickness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the interfacial water film
are indicated in the plot title. The fields shown in Figs. 10–12 correspond
to this 2-D simulation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=159.335433pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/articles/9/699/2018/se-9-699-2018-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1580">The numerical results are expressed as the real part of the P wave modulus
and the P wave attenuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 9). We observe that a decrease in
the thickness of the interfacial water film causes the attenuation and
dispersion curves to shift to lower frequencies. In fact, high attenuation
values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are observed at seismic frequencies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) when the interfacial water film is as thin as
0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the grain diameter is as large as 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Decreasing the grain diameter causes a shift of the
attenuation and dispersion curves to higher frequencies.</p>
      <p id="d1e1652">The geometry of the introduced model (Fig. 7) is different to the classical
squirt-flow geometries involving interconnected plane cracks or a plane crack
connected to a low<?pagebreak page705?> aspect ratio pore.
To better understand how dissipation
occurs for this type of geometry, we initially focus on the fluid pressure
field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10) in the circular interfacial water film at the
characteristic frequency. The vertical compression of the model illustrated
in Fig. 7 causes a larger deformation of the interfacial water film at the
top and bottom than on the lateral sections. This observation is
comparable to horizontal cracks that are more deformed by vertical
compression than vertical cracks in a classical squirt flow model. Here, the
heterogeneous deformation causes fluid pressure to increase. The most
deformed parts which are the top and the bottom, exhibit the highest fluid
pressure, as shown in Fig. 10. The pressure gradient present in this
heterogeneous pressure field induces fluid to be displaced from the regions
of higher pressure (top and bottom) towards the regions of lower pressure
(left and right). The components of the fluid velocity field in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions ,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 11), and the corresponding local
attenuation field, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12), are only depicted in the top right quadrant
of the model. Considering the symmetry of this process in the four quadrants of
the circular interfacial water film (Fig. 10) it is sufficient to show only
one quadrant.</p>
      <p id="d1e1711">In Fig. 11 we observe the text book (e.g., Jaeger et al., 2007) parabolic
profile of the fluid velocity across the interfacial water film, with larger
fluid velocity in the center of the film, governed by Navier–Stokes
equations. This fluid velocity is associated with an energy dissipation
caused by viscous friction, shown in Fig. 12. At the boundaries of the
interfacial water film, larger viscous friction explains the lower fluid
velocity and larger energy dissipation, in comparison to the center of the
film. The attenuation is strongly reduced towards the center of the film by
a few orders of magnitude. Looking at how these fields change along the
interfacial water film, we observe that the maximal velocity and attenuation
(compare Figs. 11 and 12) coincide with the maximal pressure gradient
(Fig. 10). In contrast, in the middle of the<?pagebreak page706?> higher pressure and lower
pressure regions, the pressure gradient is minimal causing the fluid velocity
and attenuation to drop drastically.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Effects of water pockets and water bridges</title>
      <p id="d1e1721">In this subsection, a few alterations are added to the basic model
illustrated in Fig. 7. These alterations are based on more detailed observations
obtained from SRXCT, such as water pockets in non-porous GH or a water bridge
which might occur and connect two neighboring interfacial water films
(Fig. 13). The effect of these abovementioned features on the P wave modulus
dispersion and attenuation (Fig. 14) is studied and compared to results
obtained from corresponding models where these features have not been
considered.</p>
      <p id="d1e1724">The inclusion of water pockets has a modest effect on the attenuation and
dispersion, while it reduces the overall value of the P wave modulus, as
a certain volume of GH is replaced by a much less stiff material (water). The
modest increase in attenuation is associated with a more compressible
effective background; no attenuation occurs within the water pockets.</p>
      <p id="d1e1727">The connecting water bridge introduces an additional length scale for the
dissipation process, as fluid flow and dissipation will also occur through
this relatively short and wide path. This explains the additional attenuation
peak observed at higher frequencies, while the previous peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz suffers a slight reduction in magnitude. A reduction in magnitude
occurs because the pressure equilibration process involving the water bridge
causes a reduction in pressure in the region connected to the bridge and thus
a reduction of the previously discussed (Fig. 9) pressure gradient between
this region and the sides of the circular interfacial water film. The
dispersion agrees with the attenuation curve, with two inflections
corresponding to the two attenuation peaks between the high- and
low-frequency limits.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Evaluation of 3-D effects</title>
      <p id="d1e1751">This subsection considers a comparison between the results of the simulation
illustrated in Figs. 10–12, for the 2-D model shown in Fig. 7, and those of
a simulation performed on its 3-D counterpart. Our 3-D model consists of
a sphere in the middle of a cube (Fig. 15), for which a centered cross
section matches the 2-D model shown in Fig. 7. The thickness of the water
film is 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the grain diameter is 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as for
Figs. 10–12). The numerical results are shown in Fig. 16 with an excellent
agreement between the results from the 2-D and 3-D models in terms of
magnitude and the characteristic frequency of attenuation. Indeed this was
expected due to the radial symmetry of the spherical interfacial water film.
This outcome indicates that 3-D effects are small for the adopted geometry.
The results based on simple 2-D models approximate the dissipation
magnitude and frequency dependence of their corresponding 3-D scenarios well.
The difference in the overall value of the real-valued P wave modulus is
associated with a larger relative quantity of soft GH and a lower relative
quantity of stiff quartz in the 3-D model.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1781">Interfacial water films between sediment grains and the embedding GH matrix
were recently observed in GH-bearing sediments through synchrotron-based
micro-tomography at a spatial resolution down to 0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based
on these data, we have determined the appearance and thicknesses of such
films. With this knowledge, a new conceptual squirt flow model, which refers
to a spherical water film coating the solid grains, was introduced for
GH-bearing sediments. This geometry differs from the classical squirt flow
models involving microcracks, interconnected or connected to spherical pores.
Numerical simulations were performed to calculate the energy dissipation in
the proposed model, considering a range of scenarios. Our results show that
squirt flow in spherical interfacial water films can cause large and
frequency-dependent P wave attenuation in a broad frequency range including
seismic frequencies.</p>
      <p id="d1e1794">The numerical scheme is based on a set of coupled equations that reduce to
Hooke's law in the subdomains of the model corresponding to the elastic solid
materials (grains and GH) and to the quasi-static, linearized Navier–Stokes
equations in the subdomains corresponding to the fluid (water). The results
for our conceptual model show that the P wave attenuation peak is shifted to
lower frequencies with decreasing thickness of the interfacial water film and
with increasing grain size (or the length of the film), as analogously known
for the microcrack aperture and length in classical squirt flow models.
Furthermore, we tested the effect of inserting<?pagebreak page707?> water pockets in an embedding
GH matrix and the effect of connecting two neighboring interfacial water
films through a water bridge. In general, the water bridges have a stronger
effect on energy dissipation than the water pockets. Introducing such
connections between neighboring interfacial water films causes a broadening
of the P wave attenuation spectrum towards higher frequencies. Conversely,
the presence of water pockets in the GH background only causes a slight
overall increase in P wave attenuation. Although the majority of our
simulations were performed for 2-D models, results of a 3-D simulation showed
that 3-D effects are small for the basic 2-D models that we have considered.</p>
      <p id="d1e1797">Our results represent a strong base to explain fundamental processes in
GH-bearing sediments and support previous speculations (Guerin and Goldberg,
2002; Dvorkin and Uden, 2004; Priest et al., 2006) that squirt flow is an
important attenuation mechanism in such media, even at frequencies as low as
those in the seismic range. This strengthens the perception that P wave
attenuation may be used as an indirect geophysical attribute to estimate GH
saturation. Nevertheless, further studies considering more realistic
geometries for the microstructure of GH bearing sediments are necessary for
the development of a successful strategy to estimate GH saturations, where
hydrate is distributed
in a dispersed manner instead of massive layers. This study represents the
first attempt at understanding P wave attenuation in unconsolidated sediments
which have large GH saturations. Following work will be aimed at implementing
the segmented 3-D images obtained from synchrotron-based micro-tomography as
a direct model input for numerical investigations, whereby realistic
grain-to-grain contacts will be taken into account. The step towards more
realistic structures as a model input is<?pagebreak page709?> challenging due to the corresponding
large computational demand. Furthermore, such model input requires additional
segmentation steps for the 3-D images that allow for a smoothing of the
stair-like resolution artifacts at the boundaries of the interfacial water
films.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1804">The data can be accessed upon request from any of the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1810">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1816">The authors thank the staff of the GZG crystallography group headed by
Werner F. Kuhs of the Georg August
University, Göttingen, for their collaboration during the in situ
experiments at the TOMCAT beamline (Paul Scherrer Institute in Villigen,
Switzerland) in 2012 and 2013. The presented work was co-funded by the German
Science Foundation (DFG grant Ke 508/20 and Ku
920/18).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Charlotte
Krawczyk<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adelinet, M., Fortin, J., Guéguen, Y., Schubnel, A., and
Geoffroy, L.: Frequency and fluid effects on elastic properties of basalt:
Experimental investigations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L02303,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL041660</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bagherzadeh, S. A., Englezos, P., Alavi, S., and Ripmeester, J. A.:
Molecular modeling of the dissociation of methane hydrate in contact with
a silica surface, J. Phys. Chem. B, 116, 3188–3197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2086544" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp2086544</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bai, D., Chen, G., Zhang, X., and Wang, W.: Microsecond molecular
dynamics simulations of the kinetic pathways of gas hydrate formation from
solid surfaces, Langmuir, 27, 5961–5967, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/la105088b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/la105088b</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Bass, J. D.: Elasticity of Minerals, Glasses and Melts, in:
Mineral physics and crystallography: a handbook of physical constants, edited
by: Ahrens, T. J., American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, USA, 45–63,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bellefleur, G., Riedel, M., Brent, T., Wright, F., and Dallimore, S. R.:
Implication of seismic attenuation for gas hydrate resource characterization,
Mallik, Mackenzie Delta, Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B10311,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB004976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JB004976</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Berge, L. I., Jacobsen, K. A., and Solstad, A.: Measured
acoustic wave velocities of R11 (CCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>F) hydrate samples with and without
sand as a function of hydrate concentration, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 104,
15415–15424, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Best, A., Priest, J., and Clayton, C.: A Resonant Column Study
of the Seismic Properties of Methane-Hydrate-Bearing Sand, in: Geophysical
Characterization of Gas Hydrates, edited by: Riedel, M., Willoughby, E. C.,
and Chopra, S., Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, USA, 337–347, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Best, A. I., Priest, J. A., Clayton, C. R. I., and Rees, E. V. L.:
The effect of methane hydrate morphology and water saturation on seismic wave
attenuation in sand under shallow sub-seafloor conditions, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 368, 78–87, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Biot, M. A.: Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation
in porous media, J. Appl. Phys., 33, 1482–1498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1728759" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1728759</ext-link>,
1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Bohrmann, G. T. M. E.: Gas Hydrates in Marine Sediments,
in: Marine Geochemistry, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 481–512, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bourbié, T., Coussy, O., and Zinszner, B.: Acoustics of porous media,
Editions Technip, Paris, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Brajanovski, M., Gurevich, B., and Schoenberg, M.: A model
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wave attenuation and dispersion in a porous medium permeated by
aligned fractures, Geophys. J. Int., 163, 372–384,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02722.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02722.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Chaouachi, M., Falenty, A., Sell, K., Enzmann, F., Kersten, M.,
Haberthür, D., and Kuhs, W. F.: Microstructural evolution of gas hydrates
in sedimentary matrices observed with synchrotron X-ray computed tomographic
microscopy, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 16, 1711–1722, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chapman, S., Tisato, N., Quintal, B., Holliger, K.: Seismic
attenuation in partially saturated Berea sandstone submitted to a range of
confining pressures, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 121, 1664–1676,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JB012575</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Chuvilin, E. M., Istomin, V. A., and Safonov, S. S.: Residual
nonclathrated water in sediments in equilibrium with gas hydrate Comparison
with unfrozen water, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 68, 68–73, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Collett, T. S. and John, L.: 19. Detection of gas hydrate with
downhole logs and assessment of gas hydrate concentrations (saturations) and
gas volumes on the Blake Ridge with electrically resistivity log data,
Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Texas A&amp;M University,
College Station, TX, USA, 164, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Dai, J., Xu, H., Snyder, F., and Dutta, N.: Detection and
estimation of gas hydrates using rock physics and seismic inversion: Examples
from the northern deepwater Gulf of Mexico, The Leading Edge, 23, 60–66,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dai, S., Santamarina, J. C., Waite, W. F., and Kneafsey, T. J.:
Hydrate morphology: Physical properties of sands with patchy hydrate
saturation, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117,  B11205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jb009667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jb009667</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Dewangan, P., Mandal, R., Jaiswal, P., Ramprasad, T., and
Sriram, G.: Estimation of seismic attenuation of gas hydrate bearing
sediments from multi-channel seismic data: A case study from Krishna-Godavari
offshore basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 58, 356–367, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Dvorkin, J. and Uden, R.: Seismic wave attenuation in a methane
hydrate reservoir, The Leading Edge, 23, 730–732, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Dvorkin, J., Nur, A., Uden, R., and Taner, T.: Rock physics
of a gas hydrate reservoir, The Leading Edge, 22, 842–847,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Ecker, C., Dvorkin, J., and Nur, A. M.: Sediments with gas
hydrates: Internal structure from seismic AVO, Geophysics, 63,
1659–1669, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Ecker, C., Dvorkin, J., and Nur, A. M.: Estimating the amount
of gas hydrate and free gas from marine seismic data,
Geophysics, 65, 565–573, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page710?><ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Falenty, A., Chaouachi, M., Neher, S. H., Sell, K., Schwarz, J.-O.,
Wolf, M., Enzmann, F., Kersten, M., Haberthur, D., and Kuhs, W. F.:
Stop-and-go in situ tomography of dynamic processes – gas hydrate formation
in sedimentary matrices, Acta Crystallogr. A, 71, p. 154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273315097740" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1107/S2053273315097740</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Gerner, A., Saenger, E. H., and Shapiro, S. A.: Attenuation
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> waves due to interlayer fluid flow in hydrate-bearing sediments, J.
Geophys. Eng., 4, 394–403, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Guerin, G. and Goldberg, D.: Sonic waveform attenuation in gas hydrate-bearing
sediments from the Mallik 2L-38 research well, Mackenzie Delta, Canada, J.
Geophys.  Res., 107, EPM 1-1–EPM 1-11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000556" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JB000556</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Guerin, G. and Goldberg, D.: Modeling of acoustic wave dissipation in gas
hydrate-bearing sediments, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 6,
Q07010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GC000918</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Gurevich, B., Makarynska, D., de Paula, O. B., and Pervukhina, M.:
A simple model for squirt-flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid-saturated
granular rocks, Geophysics, 75, N109–N120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3509782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.3509782</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Helgerud, M. B., Waite, W. F., Kirby, S. H., and Nur, A.:
Measured temperature and pressure dependence of vp and vs in compacted,
polycrystalline si methane and sii methane-ethane hydrate., Can. J. Phys.,
81, 47–53, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hu, G. W., Ye, Y. G., Zhang, J., Liu, C. L., Diao, S. B.,
and Wang, J. S.: Acoustic properties of gas hydrate-bearing consolidated
sediments and experimental testing of elastic velocity models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, B02102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb006160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jb006160</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G. W., and Zimmerman, R. W.:
Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th ed., Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kvenvolden, K. A.: Gas hydrates – geological perspective
and global change, Rev. Geophys., 31,  173–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG00268" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93RG00268</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Li, F. G., Sun, C. Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, X. X., Guo, X. Q.,
and Chen, G. J.: Laboratory Measurements of the Effects of
Methane/Tetrahydrofuran Concentration and Grain Size on the P-Wave Velocity
of Hydrate-Bearing Sand, Energ. Fuels, 25, 2076–2082, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Liang, S. and Kusalik, P. G.: The mobility of water
molecules through gas hydrates, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 1870–1876,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja108434h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja108434h</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Marín-Moreno, H., Sahoo, S. K., and Best, A. I.:
Theoretical modeling insights into elastic wave attenuation mechanisms in
marine sediments with pore-filling methane hydrate, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 60, 1835–1847, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013577" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JB013577</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Marone, F. and Stampanoni, M.: Regridding reconstruction
algorithm for real-time tomographic imaging, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 19,
1029–1037, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Mavko, G. and Jizba, D.: Estimating grain-scale fluid
effects on velocity dispersion in rocks, Geophysics, 56, 1940–1949,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1443005</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Müller, T. M., Gurevich, B., and Lebedev, M.:
Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave-induced flow in
porous rocks – A review, Geophysics, 75, 75A147–75A164,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3463417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.3463417</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, W. F., Winkler, K. W., and Kleinberg, R. L.:
Acoustic relaxation in sedimentary rocks, dependence on grain contacts and
fluid saturation, Geophysics, 51, 757–766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442128" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1442128</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Nixon, M. F. and Grozic, J. L.: Submarine slope
failure due to gas hydrate dissociation: a preliminary quantification, Can.
Geotech. J., 44, 314–325, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>O'Connell, R. J. and Budiansky, B.: Viscoelastic
properties of fluid-saturated cracked solids, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 82,
5719–5735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i036p05719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB082i036p05719</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Pimienta, L., Fortin, J., and Guéguen, Y.: Bulk
modulus dispersion and attenuation in sandstones, Geophysics, 80, D111–D127,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0335.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2014-0335.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Priest, J. A., Best, A. I., and Clayton, C. R. I.:
Attenuation of seismic waves in methane gas hydrate-bearing sand, Geophys. J.
Int., 164, 149–159, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Priest, J. A., Rees, E. V. L., and Clayton, C. R. I.:
Influence of gas hydrate morphology on the seismic velocities of sands, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114,  B11205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jb006284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jb006284</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Quintal, B., Jänicke, R., Rubino, J. G., Steeb, H., and
Holliger, K.: Sensitivity of S-wave attenuation to the connectivity of
fractures in fluid-saturated rocks, Geophysics, 79, WB15–WB24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0409.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2013-0409.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Quintal, B., Rubino, J. G., Caspari, E., and Holliger, K.:
A simple hydromechanical approach for simulating squirt-type flow,
Geophysics, 81, D335–D344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0383.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2015-0383.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Sams, M. S., Neep, J. P., Worthington, M. H., and King, M. S.:
The measurement of velocity dispersion and frequency-dependent intrinsic
attenuation in sedimentary rocks, Geophysics, 62, 1456–1464,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1444249</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Schicks, J. M., Spangenberg, E., Giese, R., Steinhauer, B.,
Klump, J., and Luzi, M.: New Approaches for the Production of Hydrocarbons
from Hydrate Bearing Sediments, Energies, 4, 151–172, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Schicks, J. M., Spangenberg, E., Giese, R., Luzi-Helbing, M.,
Priegnitz, M., and Beeskow-Strauch, B.: A Counter-Current Heat-Exchange
Reactor for the Thermal Stimulation of Hydrate-Bearing Sediments, Energies,
6, 3002–3016, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sell, K., Saenger, E. H., Falenty, A., Chaouachi, M., Haberthür,
D., Enzmann, F., Kuhs, W. F., and Kersten, M.: On the path to the digital
rock physics of gas hydrate-bearing sediments – processing of in situ
synchrotron-tomography data, Solid Earth, 7, 1243–1258,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-1243-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-7-1243-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Sloan, E. D. and Koh, C. A.: Clathrate hydrates of natural
gases, 3rd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Spangenberg, E. and Kulenkampff, J.: Influence of methane
hydrate content on electrical sediment properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L24315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006gl028188</ext-link>, 2006</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Spangenberg, E., Priegnitz, M., Heeschen, K., and Schicks, J. M.:
Are Laboratory-Formed Hydrate-Bearing Systems Analogous to Those in
Nature?, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 60, 258–268, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Subramaniyan, S., Quintal, B., Madonna, C., and Saenger, E. H.:
Laboratory-based seismic attenuation in Fontainebleau sandstone: Evidence of
squirt flow, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 7526–7535,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JB012290</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Tisato, N. and Quintal, B.: Measurements of seismic
attenuation and transient fluid pressure in partially saturated Berea
sandstone:<?pagebreak page711?> evidence of fluid flow on the mesoscopic scale: Geophys. J. Int.,
195, 342–351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt259" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggt259</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Tisato, N. and Quintal, B.: Laboratory measurements of
seismic attenuation in sandstone: Strain versus fluid saturation effects,
Geophysics, 79, WB9–WB14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0419.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2013-0419.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Tohidi, B., Anderson, R., Clennell, M. B., Burgass, R. W.,
and Biderkab, A. B.: Visual observation of gas-hydrate formation and
dissociationin synthetic porous media by means of glass micromodels, Geology,
29, 867–870,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0867:VOOGHF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0867:VOOGHF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Waite, W. F., Santamarina, J. C., Cortes, D. D., Dugan, B., Espinoza, D. N.,
Germaine, J., Jang, J., Jung, J. W., Kneafsey, T. J., Shin, H., Soga, K.,
Winters, W. J., and Yun, T. S.: Physical properties of hydrate-bearing
sediments, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG4003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008rg000279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008rg000279</ext-link>, 2009</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>White, J. E.: Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in
rocks with partial gas saturation, Geophysics, 40, 224–232,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1440520</ext-link>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> White, J. E., Mikhaylova, N. G., and Lyakhovitskiy, F. M.:
Low-frequency seismic waves in fluid-saturated layered rocks, Izv.-Phys.
Solid Eart., 11, 654–659, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Winkler, K. W. and Nur, A.: Seismic attenuation:
Effects of pore fluids and frictional-sliding, Geophysics, 47, 1–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1441276</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Yun, T. S., Francisca, F. M., Santamarina, J. C.,
and Ruppel, C.: Compressional and shear wave velocities in uncemented
sediment containing gas hydrate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,  L10609,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022607</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, Q., Li, F. G., Sun, C. Y., Li, Q. P., Wu, X. Y.,
Liu, B., and Chen, G. J.: Compressional wave velocity measurements through
sandy sediments containing methane hydrate, Am. Mineral., 96, 1425–1432,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Squirt flow due to interfacial water films in hydrate bearing sediments</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Sediments
containing gas hydrate dispersed in the pore space are known to show
a characteristic seismic anomaly which is a high attenuation along with
increasing seismic velocities. Currently, this observation cannot be fully
explained albeit squirt-flow type mechanisms on the microscale have been
speculated to be the cause. Recent major findings from in situ experiments,
using the <q>gas in excess</q> and <q>water in excess</q> formation method, and coupled
with high-resolution synchrotron-based X-ray micro-tomography, have revealed
the systematic presence of thin water films between the quartz grains and the
encrusting hydrate. The data obtained from these experiments underwent an
image processing procedure to quantify the thicknesses and geometries of the
aforementioned interfacial water films. Overall, the water films vary from
sub-micrometer to a few micrometers in thickness. In addition, some of
the water films interconnect through water bridges. This geometrical analysis
is used to propose a new conceptual squirt flow model for hydrate bearing
sediments. A series of numerical simulations is performed considering
variations of the proposed model to study seismic attenuation caused by such
thin water films. Our results support previous speculation that squirt flow
can explain high attenuation at seismic frequencies in hydrate bearing
sediments, but based on a conceptual squirt flow model which is geometrically
different than those previously considered.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Adelinet, M., Fortin, J., Guéguen, Y., Schubnel, A., and
Geoffroy, L.: Frequency and fluid effects on elastic properties of basalt:
Experimental investigations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L02303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041660</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Bagherzadeh, S. A., Englezos, P., Alavi, S., and Ripmeester, J. A.:
Molecular modeling of the dissociation of methane hydrate in contact with
a silica surface, J. Phys. Chem. B, 116, 3188–3197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2086544" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2086544</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Bai, D., Chen, G., Zhang, X., and Wang, W.: Microsecond molecular
dynamics simulations of the kinetic pathways of gas hydrate formation from
solid surfaces, Langmuir, 27, 5961–5967, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/la105088b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/la105088b</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Bass, J. D.: Elasticity of Minerals, Glasses and Melts, in:
Mineral physics and crystallography: a handbook of physical constants, edited
by: Ahrens, T. J., American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, USA, 45–63,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Bellefleur, G., Riedel, M., Brent, T., Wright, F., and Dallimore, S. R.:
Implication of seismic attenuation for gas hydrate resource characterization,
Mallik, Mackenzie Delta, Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B10311,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB004976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB004976</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Berge, L. I., Jacobsen, K. A., and Solstad, A.: Measured
acoustic wave velocities of R11 (CCl<sub>3</sub>F) hydrate samples with and without
sand as a function of hydrate concentration, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 104,
15415–15424, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Best, A., Priest, J., and Clayton, C.: A Resonant Column Study
of the Seismic Properties of Methane-Hydrate-Bearing Sand, in: Geophysical
Characterization of Gas Hydrates, edited by: Riedel, M., Willoughby, E. C.,
and Chopra, S., Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, USA, 337–347, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Best, A. I., Priest, J. A., Clayton, C. R. I., and Rees, E. V. L.:
The effect of methane hydrate morphology and water saturation on seismic wave
attenuation in sand under shallow sub-seafloor conditions, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 368, 78–87, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Biot, M. A.: Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation
in porous media, J. Appl. Phys., 33, 1482–1498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1728759" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1728759</a>,
1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Bohrmann, G. T. M. E.: Gas Hydrates in Marine Sediments,
in: Marine Geochemistry, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 481–512, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bourbié, T., Coussy, O., and Zinszner, B.: Acoustics of porous media,
Editions Technip, Paris, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Brajanovski, M., Gurevich, B., and Schoenberg, M.: A model
for <i>P</i> wave attenuation and dispersion in a porous medium permeated by
aligned fractures, Geophys. J. Int., 163, 372–384,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02722.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02722.x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Chaouachi, M., Falenty, A., Sell, K., Enzmann, F., Kersten, M.,
Haberthür, D., and Kuhs, W. F.: Microstructural evolution of gas hydrates
in sedimentary matrices observed with synchrotron X-ray computed tomographic
microscopy, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 16, 1711–1722, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Chapman, S., Tisato, N., Quintal, B., Holliger, K.: Seismic
attenuation in partially saturated Berea sandstone submitted to a range of
confining pressures, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 121, 1664–1676,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012575</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Chuvilin, E. M., Istomin, V. A., and Safonov, S. S.: Residual
nonclathrated water in sediments in equilibrium with gas hydrate Comparison
with unfrozen water, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 68, 68–73, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Collett, T. S. and John, L.: 19. Detection of gas hydrate with
downhole logs and assessment of gas hydrate concentrations (saturations) and
gas volumes on the Blake Ridge with electrically resistivity log data,
Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Texas A&amp;M University,
College Station, TX, USA, 164, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Dai, J., Xu, H., Snyder, F., and Dutta, N.: Detection and
estimation of gas hydrates using rock physics and seismic inversion: Examples
from the northern deepwater Gulf of Mexico, The Leading Edge, 23, 60–66,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Dai, S., Santamarina, J. C., Waite, W. F., and Kneafsey, T. J.:
Hydrate morphology: Physical properties of sands with patchy hydrate
saturation, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117,  B11205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jb009667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jb009667</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Dewangan, P., Mandal, R., Jaiswal, P., Ramprasad, T., and
Sriram, G.: Estimation of seismic attenuation of gas hydrate bearing
sediments from multi-channel seismic data: A case study from Krishna-Godavari
offshore basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 58, 356–367, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Dvorkin, J. and Uden, R.: Seismic wave attenuation in a methane
hydrate reservoir, The Leading Edge, 23, 730–732, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Dvorkin, J., Nur, A., Uden, R., and Taner, T.: Rock physics
of a gas hydrate reservoir, The Leading Edge, 22, 842–847,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Ecker, C., Dvorkin, J., and Nur, A. M.: Sediments with gas
hydrates: Internal structure from seismic AVO, Geophysics, 63,
1659–1669, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Ecker, C., Dvorkin, J., and Nur, A. M.: Estimating the amount
of gas hydrate and free gas from marine seismic data,
Geophysics, 65, 565–573, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Falenty, A., Chaouachi, M., Neher, S. H., Sell, K., Schwarz, J.-O.,
Wolf, M., Enzmann, F., Kersten, M., Haberthur, D., and Kuhs, W. F.:
Stop-and-go in situ tomography of dynamic processes – gas hydrate formation
in sedimentary matrices, Acta Crystallogr. A, 71, p. 154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273315097740" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273315097740</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Gerner, A., Saenger, E. H., and Shapiro, S. A.: Attenuation
of <i>P</i> waves due to interlayer fluid flow in hydrate-bearing sediments, J.
Geophys. Eng., 4, 394–403, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guerin, G. and Goldberg, D.: Sonic waveform attenuation in gas hydrate-bearing
sediments from the Mallik 2L-38 research well, Mackenzie Delta, Canada, J.
Geophys.  Res., 107, EPM 1-1–EPM 1-11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000556" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000556</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Guerin, G. and Goldberg, D.: Modeling of acoustic wave dissipation in gas
hydrate-bearing sediments, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 6,
Q07010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000918" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GC000918</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Gurevich, B., Makarynska, D., de Paula, O. B., and Pervukhina, M.:
A simple model for squirt-flow dispersion and attenuation in fluid-saturated
granular rocks, Geophysics, 75, N109–N120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3509782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3509782</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Helgerud, M. B., Waite, W. F., Kirby, S. H., and Nur, A.:
Measured temperature and pressure dependence of vp and vs in compacted,
polycrystalline si methane and sii methane-ethane hydrate., Can. J. Phys.,
81, 47–53, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation> Hu, G. W., Ye, Y. G., Zhang, J., Liu, C. L., Diao, S. B.,
and Wang, J. S.: Acoustic properties of gas hydrate-bearing consolidated
sediments and experimental testing of elastic velocity models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, B02102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb006160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb006160</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G. W., and Zimmerman, R. W.:
Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th ed., Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Kvenvolden, K. A.: Gas hydrates – geological perspective
and global change, Rev. Geophys., 31,  173–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG00268" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG00268</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation> Li, F. G., Sun, C. Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, X. X., Guo, X. Q.,
and Chen, G. J.: Laboratory Measurements of the Effects of
Methane/Tetrahydrofuran Concentration and Grain Size on the P-Wave Velocity
of Hydrate-Bearing Sand, Energ. Fuels, 25, 2076–2082, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Liang, S. and Kusalik, P. G.: The mobility of water
molecules through gas hydrates, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 1870–1876,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja108434h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja108434h</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Marín-Moreno, H., Sahoo, S. K., and Best, A. I.:
Theoretical modeling insights into elastic wave attenuation mechanisms in
marine sediments with pore-filling methane hydrate, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 60, 1835–1847, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013577" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013577</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Marone, F. and Stampanoni, M.: Regridding reconstruction
algorithm for real-time tomographic imaging, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 19,
1029–1037, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Mavko, G. and Jizba, D.: Estimating grain-scale fluid
effects on velocity dispersion in rocks, Geophysics, 56, 1940–1949,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443005</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Müller, T. M., Gurevich, B., and Lebedev, M.:
Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave-induced flow in
porous rocks – A review, Geophysics, 75, 75A147–75A164,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3463417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3463417</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Murphy, W. F., Winkler, K. W., and Kleinberg, R. L.:
Acoustic relaxation in sedimentary rocks, dependence on grain contacts and
fluid saturation, Geophysics, 51, 757–766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442128" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442128</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Nixon, M. F. and Grozic, J. L.: Submarine slope
failure due to gas hydrate dissociation: a preliminary quantification, Can.
Geotech. J., 44, 314–325, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> O'Connell, R. J. and Budiansky, B.: Viscoelastic
properties of fluid-saturated cracked solids, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 82,
5719–5735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i036p05719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i036p05719</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Pimienta, L., Fortin, J., and Guéguen, Y.: Bulk
modulus dispersion and attenuation in sandstones, Geophysics, 80, D111–D127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0335.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0335.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Priest, J. A., Best, A. I., and Clayton, C. R. I.:
Attenuation of seismic waves in methane gas hydrate-bearing sand, Geophys. J.
Int., 164, 149–159, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Priest, J. A., Rees, E. V. L., and Clayton, C. R. I.:
Influence of gas hydrate morphology on the seismic velocities of sands, J.
Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114,  B11205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jb006284" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jb006284</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> Quintal, B., Jänicke, R., Rubino, J. G., Steeb, H., and
Holliger, K.: Sensitivity of S-wave attenuation to the connectivity of
fractures in fluid-saturated rocks, Geophysics, 79, WB15–WB24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0409.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0409.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation> Quintal, B., Rubino, J. G., Caspari, E., and Holliger, K.:
A simple hydromechanical approach for simulating squirt-type flow,
Geophysics, 81, D335–D344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0383.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0383.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Sams, M. S., Neep, J. P., Worthington, M. H., and King, M. S.:
The measurement of velocity dispersion and frequency-dependent intrinsic
attenuation in sedimentary rocks, Geophysics, 62, 1456–1464,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444249</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Schicks, J. M., Spangenberg, E., Giese, R., Steinhauer, B.,
Klump, J., and Luzi, M.: New Approaches for the Production of Hydrocarbons
from Hydrate Bearing Sediments, Energies, 4, 151–172, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Schicks, J. M., Spangenberg, E., Giese, R., Luzi-Helbing, M.,
Priegnitz, M., and Beeskow-Strauch, B.: A Counter-Current Heat-Exchange
Reactor for the Thermal Stimulation of Hydrate-Bearing Sediments, Energies,
6, 3002–3016, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Sell, K., Saenger, E. H., Falenty, A., Chaouachi, M., Haberthür,
D., Enzmann, F., Kuhs, W. F., and Kersten, M.: On the path to the digital
rock physics of gas hydrate-bearing sediments – processing of in situ
synchrotron-tomography data, Solid Earth, 7, 1243–1258,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-1243-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-1243-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Sloan, E. D. and Koh, C. A.: Clathrate hydrates of natural
gases, 3rd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation> Spangenberg, E. and Kulenkampff, J.: Influence of methane
hydrate content on electrical sediment properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L24315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028188</a>, 2006
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Spangenberg, E., Priegnitz, M., Heeschen, K., and Schicks, J. M.:
Are Laboratory-Formed Hydrate-Bearing Systems Analogous to Those in
Nature?, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 60, 258–268, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Subramaniyan, S., Quintal, B., Madonna, C., and Saenger, E. H.:
Laboratory-based seismic attenuation in Fontainebleau sandstone: Evidence of
squirt flow, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 7526–7535,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012290</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Tisato, N. and Quintal, B.: Measurements of seismic
attenuation and transient fluid pressure in partially saturated Berea
sandstone: evidence of fluid flow on the mesoscopic scale: Geophys. J. Int.,
195, 342–351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt259" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt259</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Tisato, N. and Quintal, B.: Laboratory measurements of
seismic attenuation in sandstone: Strain versus fluid saturation effects,
Geophysics, 79, WB9–WB14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0419.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0419.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Tohidi, B., Anderson, R., Clennell, M. B., Burgass, R. W.,
and Biderkab, A. B.: Visual observation of gas-hydrate formation and
dissociationin synthetic porous media by means of glass micromodels, Geology,
29, 867–870,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0867:VOOGHF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0867:VOOGHF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Waite, W. F., Santamarina, J. C., Cortes, D. D., Dugan, B., Espinoza, D. N.,
Germaine, J., Jang, J., Jung, J. W., Kneafsey, T. J., Shin, H., Soga, K.,
Winters, W. J., and Yun, T. S.: Physical properties of hydrate-bearing
sediments, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG4003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008rg000279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008rg000279</a>, 2009
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> White, J. E.: Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in
rocks with partial gas saturation, Geophysics, 40, 224–232,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440520</a>, 1975.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation> White, J. E., Mikhaylova, N. G., and Lyakhovitskiy, F. M.:
Low-frequency seismic waves in fluid-saturated layered rocks, Izv.-Phys.
Solid Eart., 11, 654–659, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Winkler, K. W. and Nur, A.: Seismic attenuation:
Effects of pore fluids and frictional-sliding, Geophysics, 47, 1–15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441276</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Yun, T. S., Francisca, F. M., Santamarina, J. C.,
and Ruppel, C.: Compressional and shear wave velocities in uncemented
sediment containing gas hydrate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,  L10609,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022607</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, Q., Li, F. G., Sun, C. Y., Li, Q. P., Wu, X. Y.,
Liu, B., and Chen, G. J.: Compressional wave velocity measurements through
sandy sediments containing methane hydrate, Am. Mineral., 96, 1425–1432,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
