<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">SED</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Solid Earth Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">SED</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Solid Earth Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1869-9537</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/sed-7-1447-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Acoustic–electromagnetic effects of tectonic
movements of the crust – borehole survey</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Acoustic--electromagnetic effects of tectonic
movements of the crust}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{V.~N.~Uvarov et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Uvarov</surname><given-names>V. N.</given-names></name>
          <email>uvarovvnng@yanex.ru</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Malkin</surname><given-names>E. I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Druzhin</surname><given-names>G. I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sannikov</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pukhov</surname><given-names>V. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave
Propagation, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy
of Sciences (IKIR FEB RAS), 684034, Kamchatskii krai, Elizovo
raion, Paratunka, Mirnaya st., 7, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">V. N. Uvarov (uvarovvnng@yanex.ru)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1447</fpage><lpage>1468</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015.html">This article is available from https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Borehole radiophysical properties are briefly described. Borehole
investigation of lithosphere acoustic-electromagnetic radiation was
carried out in a seismically active region. Four main types of
anomalies of acoustic-electromagnetic radiation were
distinguished. They correspond to shear and bulk relaxations of
tectonic stress. Stability of phase relations of acoustic and
electromagnetic signals in the region of anomalies was detected that
allows us to state their coherence. It was concluded that the reason
of mutual coherence of acoustic and electromagnetic signals is the
magnetoelastic effect of the casing pipe. A mechanism of generation
of rock self-induced vibrations during tectonic stress relaxation
causing acoustic-electromagnetic emission was suggested. It was
concluded that “sigmoid” anomalies may correlate with excitation
of eigen vibrations in a fracture cavity during brittle shear
relaxation of rock tectonic stress. An explanation of the change of
anomalous “sigmoid” signal frequency was given. It is considered
to be the result of growth of rock fracture cavity and the decrease
of tectonic stress relaxation. It was concluded that a borehole,
cased in a steel pipe, together with a system of inductance coils
and a hydrophone is the effective sounding sensor for acoustic
fields of interior deep layers. It may be applied to investigate and
to monitor the geodynamic activity, in particular, in earthquake
forecasts and in monitoring of hydrocarbon deposits during their
production.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Acoustic and electromagnetic signals of lithospheric origin
accompanying earthquakes are usually associated with relaxation
processes of tectonic stress (Sobolev and Ponomarev, 2003).</p>
      <p>We may say that acoustic-electromagnetic emission of the lithosphere
is the reflection of its seismo-tectonic state. The
deformation-induced acoustic-electromagnetic emission is well known in
solid-state physics. It is the effect of stress relaxation processes
in acoustic and electromagnetic fields (Hadjicontis et al., 2007). In
material sciences, this condition is used in nondestructive testing to
get additional information on the medium of propagation and sources
(Sikula et al., 2008; Mori et al., 2009). So far, the geophysical
aspects of this phenomenon are poorly studied due to the following
circumstances.</p>
      <p>Electromagnetic radiation of the lithosphere is observed at the
background of powerful atmosphere-magnetosphere radiation,
investigation of which has long and rich history (Uvarov et al.,
2012).</p>
      <p>At present, natural atmosphere-ionosphere radiations is used as
a source of information in a number of international geophysical
projects (WWLLN, AWDANET). Estimations show that
atmosphere-magnetosphere radiation is incomparably stronger than that
of the lithosphere.  Thus, it is necessary to apply special methods to
investigate this radiation.</p>
      <p>Development of such methods (Uvarov et al., 2010; Uvarov, 2012)
allowed us to begin purposeful and correct survey of electromagnetic
radiation of lithospheric origin.</p>
      <p>An additional and a very important circumstance, which makes the
investigation of the crust wave process from surface more complicated,
is strong attenuation of both acoustic and electromagnetic radiations
in friable near-surface layer of aqueoglacial or eolian origin. In
fact, during propagation of waves of any nature in isotropic
homogeneous medium, the fraction of the radiation which passed the
distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by exponential Beer–Lambert–Bouguer law
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, the transmission
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measure of medium inhomogeneity and does
not depend on distance. It has different names in different areas of
investigations, they are: extinction coefficient, transmission
coefficient and so on. In geology, the measure of medium
inhomogeneity, associated with fluid content, is porosity, the
parameter depending on depth which, evidently, can characterize
propagation of wave fields in some measure. It is clear, that porosity
should decrease with depth due to rock pressure.</p>
      <p>Nevertheless, due to the great variety of geological conditions, we
may state only general dependence of porosity with depth. In the
investigations of porosity on large areas of homogeneous rocks, Athy
law was ascertained (Athy, 1930; Engelgard, 1964) which states
exponential dependence of porosity with depth

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        If we suggest that transmission coefficient behaves the same way with
depth <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then absorption decreases much
faster with depth, than exponentially:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        In other words, the propagation conditions become significantly worse
when approaching the surface. That means that for the effective
investigations of lithosphere wave fields, it is necessary to have
access to the crust subsurface layers which allow the waves to
propagate to great distances. Such access is possible in mines, pits
or by the means of boreholes. Application of boreholes is preferable,
since they are numerous, cover large areas and different geological
conditions.</p>
      <p>Borehole surveys of acoustic and electromagnetic radiation has been
carried out for quite a long time. Some interesting data have been
obtained on the relation of electromagnetic and acoustic radiation
with seismic activity, weather and season condition effect and the
Earth natural electromagnetic field (Gavrilov et al., 2003, 2013). In
these investigations, a borehole is considered as a means for sensor
transportation into the interior, and its radiophysical properties are
not taken into the account.  However, if borehole radiophysical
properties are considered, the efficiency of a survey may be
considerably improved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Properties of borehole-sensor</title>
      <p>A borehole is an opening drilled in a rock to investigate its
geological structure or to get fossil fluid. A borehole depth is from
several meters to several kilometers. To prevent downfalls, walls are
strengthened by cementation or by a casing pipe. We consider only
water-filled boreholes formed in the result of drilling for thermal
water, one of the main fluid deposits of Kamchatka. Nevertheless, all
the facts stated in the paper are true with some corrections for
boreholes with other content.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Acoustic properties of a borehole</title>
      <p>The vibration frequency of a borehole water column, just like the
frequency of rod natural vibrations <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is determined by the
expression:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The frequency difference between the adjacent harmonics is given by
the relation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sound velocity in
borehole medium (in water <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
integer, the harmonic number, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rod length. For example, for
a borehole with 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, the frequency of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponds to the first harmonic of water column, and the difference
between the harmonics is 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Only longitudinal waves propagate in borehole water, for which it is
a waveguide.</p>
      <p>This circumstance allows us to register waves propagating from the
borehole bottom by the sensors at the top.</p>
      <p>Since the wall surface of a borehole is the boundary between two
mediums, borehole fluid and rock, there are conditions in the borehole
for different surface waves (Rayeigh, Stoneley, Love, Lamb waves) to
appear (Borehole, 1988). The most significant are Lamb waves. Lamb
frequency spectrum of a borehole is determined by the expression:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are fluid densities in a borehole and
the surrounding medium, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are velocities of propagation of
fluid elastic vibrations and rock transverse vibrations.</p>
      <p>These waves differ from the natural vibrations of a water column by
the fact that mechanical interaction of a fluid with the bounding
walls is taken into account.</p>
      <p>Lamb waves exist in the range less than the critical frequency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined by the expression <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the borehole diameter. For our boreholes, this frequency
is within the range from one to several kilohertz.</p>
      <p>Due to the difference of sound propagation velocity in rocks of
different layers, widening of resonance lines takes place as harmonic
numbers increase.</p>
      <p>For definite numbers, overlapping of adjacent bands is observed as
well as vanishing of their structure.</p>
      <p>Longitudinal vibrations in a borehole may be excited by the shear
vertical component of both longitudinal and transverse waves. Thus,
a sensor, installed at the borehole top allows one to register the
vertical component of transverse and longitudinal vibrations of rock
different layers. In other words, a borehole is a transducer of rock
acoustic vibrations into vertically propagating longitudinal
wave. A quite deep borehole crosses several different lithologic
layers, each of which is characterized by its elastic constants.</p>
      <p>All rock layers, especially near-surface ones, have much higher
absorption than borehole water. In the result, a borehole is
a collector and a waveguide of acoustic vibrations in all the
layers. It collects vibrations of the interior different layers and
brings them to the surface. Thus, they bypass the strongly absorbing
near-surface layers.</p>
      <p>To avoid a downfall, a borehole is usually cased in a steel
pipe. Therefore, borehole electromagnetic properties are largely
determined by the fact that the borehole casing pipe is a conductor in
a weakly conducting medium, and it may be considered as an antenna in
a dielectric medium with losses (King and Schmidt, 1984).</p>
      <p><list list-type="custom">
            <list-item><label>a.</label>

              <p>Registration of the field electric component is realized by
measuring the polarization current generating in the conductor under
the influence of electromagnetic field.</p>
              <p>Usually a dipole antenna is used. In the simplest case it is
a construction of two similar linear conductors symmetrically
arranged relatively the measuring instrument.</p>
              <p>The peculiarity of the antenna applying a casing pipe is that only
one pipe end, projecting over the ground surface, may be connected
to the measuring instrument.</p>
              <p>If a casing pipe is considered as one of dipole antenna beams, then
a conductor-balancer is required to measure voltage on it. The
simplest solution is to put the balancer for measurements on the
ground surface. However, it will be affected by a strong field of
atmospheric-thunderstorm origin. It is very difficult to filter it
out of lithospheric signals.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>b.</label>

              <p>There are more opportunities during the registration of the
interior field electromagnetic component. The steel casing pipe is
a magnetic circuit which pulls the field magnetic component to the
surface. Thus, application of a magnetic antenna with a casing pipe
as a core is quite an effective solution for registration of the
interior field magnetic vertical component.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>c.</label>

              <p>We should, certainly, pay attention to the application of
magnetoelastic effect (Villary effect) (Jiles, 1995). The essence of
the effect is that the mechanical stress applied to a magnetized
ferromagnetic causes the order degree change of a domain structure,
formed by external magnetic field effect, the change of
ferromagnetic permeability and, correspondingly, of magnetic
induction. In an inductor with such a core, the change of the
passing magnetic flux induces current under the influence of
acoustic vibrations.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>Thus, a borehole is:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label><p>waveguide of longitudinal acoustic and electromagnetic
vibrations;</p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label><p>transducer of transverse electromagnetic and acoustic
vibrations into longitudinal vibrations;</p></list-item><list-item><label>c.</label><p>collector of acoustic and electromagnetic longitudinal
vibrations of the interior depth;</p></list-item><list-item><label>d.</label><p>resonance structure;</p></list-item><list-item><label>e.</label><p>transducer of acoustic vibrations into electromagnetic ones;</p></list-item><list-item><label>f.</label><p>moreover, a steel casing pipe is a magnetic circuit, pulling
the depth magnetic fields to the surface.</p></list-item></list>
Due to the large diversity of geological conditions and construction
features, each borehole is characterized by a unique
amplitude-frequency characteristic.</p>
      <p>The paper investigates acoustic-electromagnetic emission of interior
subsurface layers in a seismically active region applying a borehole
as a radiophysical device.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Experiment</title>
      <p>For this purpose, a field experiment was carried out at a borehole 74
on Korkina brook of Paratunka river basin (South Kamchatka,
52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>58<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 158<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). This well
was drilled in 1968 to the depth of 649 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
investigation of Paratunka hydrothermal deposits of Kamchatka.</p>
      <p>The casing was made by a steel pipe with 168 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter from
the surface to the depth of 195 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The water maximum
temperature of 56,8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was registered at the depth of
620 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the beginning, the well flow of
0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed, whereas the temperature was
31 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. At present there is no well flow. The borehole is
located in the zone of sublatitudinal left-lateral strike-slip fault
at the intersection with the North-Western transform zone. There is
also a zone of NNE 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> central planetary fault, i.e. the zone
of fault junction (NE 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> “opening” zone, subparallel to the
Kuril-Kamchatka trench subduction zone). Analysis of the rock bulk
allows us to suppose that the main radiation sources may be located at
the depth of 120–650 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The characteristic length of acoustic
radiation propagation in the range of 10–100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in rocks at
this depth may be within 100–10 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Registration of acoustic field was carried out by a hydrophone with
a pre-amplifier sunk into borehole water at the depth of about
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Magnetic vertical component was registered. Weak signals
of lithospheric origin were distinguished from the noise powerful
background of atmospheric-magnetospheric origin by a compensation
method (Uvarov, 2012, 2010). Two magnetic antennas fitted with antenna
amplifiers were used for that. One of them was applied for the
registration of the mixture of lithosphere electromagnetic signal and
noise of atmospheric-magnetospheric and industrial origin.</p>
      <p>The other one was used to register only the noise signal. Antennas are
two identical coils with the induction of about 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hn</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> inner diameter. A part of the casing pipe sticking out
of the ground was used in the antenna, registering the mixture, as
a magnetic core. The steel casing pipe is a magnetic circuit of the
interior electromagnetic field magnetic component.</p>
      <p>Averaged spectra of the initial electromagnetic signals (the mixture
and noise) are shown in Fig. 1. It is clear from the figure that
simple application of the difference of signals does not suppress
noise completely, though, it significantly eliminates atmospherics.</p>
      <p>Much better results in noise suppression are obtained by the
subtraction of average weighted value of noise from the
mixture. Weight coefficient is found by minimization of
root-mean-square deviation of the mixture from noise value. In the
result, significant suppression of noise is achieved. The mode
structure of the borehole natural acoustic vibrations, clear spectral
bands in the region lower than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is clearly seen in
Fig. 1, where it is marked by an ellipse, and in the upper part of
Fig. 2.</p>
      <p>The basic analysis of signals was carried out applying the Fourier
discrete transform with Haar window with 44 100 point length, the
number of signal samples per 1 s.</p>
      <p>The obtained spectrum has the frequency scale in hertz.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
      <p>Figure 2 shows an example of synchronous fragments of dynamic spectrum
variations of electromagnetic and acoustic channels in the rage from 0
to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Application of the differential method for
electromagnetic radiation analysis significantly suppressed the noise
of thunderstorm and industrial origin.  Thunderstorm radiation
(atmospehrics) effect is remained in the form of weak vertical
lines. There are weak even lines parallel to the time axis at the
frequencies of 50 and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the region of industrial
radiation bands. The great part of the objects in this figure is the
manifestation of lithospheric processes.</p>
      <p>Hereafer, the term “lithospheric” is introduced to denote wave
effects of lithospheric processes. The most vividly lithospherics are
seen on dynamic spectra in the form of diffuse spots, one or several
spectral harmonics evenly or randomly changing with line time
(Fig. 2). In the records of initial data, trains with the duration
from 1 to 4 min and amplitude, exceeding the background value by
5–20 times, correspond to strong lithospherics. Correspondence
between the acoustic and electromagnetic lithospherics is clear.</p>
      <p>Two classes were distinguished; they differ by the character of
lithospheric spectra, line and diffusive ones. In their turn,
lithospherics with a single spectral harmonic (hereafter
“monosigmoid”) (Fig. 3–1), with several spectral harmonics
(“polysigmoid”) (Fig. 3–2), and with monochromic randomly changing
spectrum (“trill”) (Fig. 3–3) may be distinguished among the
lithospherics with line spectrum.</p>
      <p>Further, the description of lithospheric spectra is presented.</p>
      <p>One of the most interesting types of lithosperics is a “monosigmoid”
(Fig. 3–1). Their duration is 3–4 min. The frequency range is 70
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>÷</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This type of lithospherics has
pseudo-monochromatic spectrum. The only spectral line of
a lithospheric begins at the frequency of about 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Its
frequency decreases with time. The lithospheric reaches its maximum
intensity a minute after the beginning at about 80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ends
in 2–3 min after the maximum at the frequency of about
70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum value of the intensity may exceed the
background value by 15–20 times. Lithospheric frequency change with
time resembles Doppler effect from a source passing by. For the sound
velocity of 3000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a rock medium, it corresponds to
the motion velocity of about 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In natural
conditions of rock medium, such velocity of a body is
impossible. However, such velocities are quite possible for processes,
for example, propagation of a fracture front edge. Asymmetry of a
“monosigmoid” form relatively the signal maximum value indicates the
fact that the duration of process development is two times less than
the time of complete attenuation.</p>
      <p>“Polysigmoids” are shown in Fig. 3–2. A polysigmoid is
a lithospheric with line spectrum. Its duration is 3–4 min. Its spectrum is a set of synchronous
harmonic-monosigmoids which frequencies are shifted by
29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Just like for the monosigmoids, frequency changes to
the range of low ones with time. The final change of harmonic
frequency is proportional to the spectral component average frequency.</p>
      <p>“Trill” lithospheric is illustrated in Fig. 3–3. It has low
intensity, line spectrum and is characterized by randomly changing
frequency. Its duration is 1–2 min. The frequency range is
50–80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This type of anomalies does not almost manifest in
wave forms.</p>
      <p>Figure 3–4 shows a spectrochronogram of a “roar” lithosperic.</p>
      <p>This lithospheric is characterized by diffusive spectrum and its wave
form amplitude exceeds the background value by 6–10 times. Mainly, it
appears at the frequencies in the range of 20–40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HZ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and has
the duration of 1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. A series of such anomalies is
frequently followed one after the other (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p>Anomalies with line spectrum may overlap diffusive anomalies (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p>Stability of phase relations of acoustic and electromagnetic vibrations is observed
for all types of anomalies. It allows us to state that acoustic and
electromagnetic radiations have the same source. On the parametric
graph of acoustic and electromagnetic signal wave forms, phase
relations (Lissajous figure) of all types of lithospherics form
a well- defined ellipsoid, in which electromagnetic signal lags behind
the acoustic one.</p>
      <p>It may be caused by two alternatives:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1.</label><p>Acoustic and electromagnetic signals are the effects of the
same process.</p><p>During the generation, these signals are synchronous but may differ
in phase.</p><p>The difference of the propagation medium effect due to different
nature of the signals should lead to the stochastic dependence of
the difference of these signal phases on time. In addition, various
sources are at different random distances from the receiver. It
should show up in the different delay times of the acoustic signal
relative to the electromagnetic.</p><p>However, it is not observed.  Thus, this hypothesis should be
rejected.</p></list-item><list-item><label>2.</label><p>In the case, when one of the signals is generated in the
sensor under the effect of the other signal, one should expect
a stable phase difference between the signals. The resultant signal
is the result of time convolution of transducer transfer function
and of initial signal. When the transducer “memory” period is
small enough, the insertion phase change is a constant for this
mode.</p></list-item></list>
Consequently, the course of electromagnetic signal generation is the
acoustic signal.</p>
      <p>The most possible reason for this is the magnetoelstic transform of
acoustic radiation in the casing pipe (Villary effect).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The Earth's crust is an inhomogeneous media according to mechanical
and physical properties, which is in the state of critically unstable
balance between stresses and deformations (elastic and
inelastic). Each type of deformation corresponds to a threshold, when
it is exceeded the elastic deformation changes to the inelastic one
(fracture). Depending on the type of prevailing stresses,
a deformation has volumetric, shear or mixed character. Any fracture
in the crust takes place in the finite size region. Its creations is
an avalanche process accompanied by acoustic and electromagnetic
radiation.</p>
      <p>Crust inhomogeneity becomes apparent from the fact that every
elementary volume of its substance is characterized by a set of
fracture process parameters.</p>
      <p>Such parameters are the following:</p>
      <p><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p>stress threshold for inelastic initial deformation (shear and
volumetric),</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>friction coefficient for inelastic deformation, the analog of
which in hydrodynamics is viscosity (shear and volumetric),</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>stress transfer rate (longitudinal and transverse sound
velocity).</p>
          </list-item>
        </list>It is known that the process of volume element deformation may be
presented as a sum of shear and volumetric deformations.</p>
      <p>Volumetric deformation occurs under the effect of isotropic
(hydrostatic) stress.</p>
      <p>The hydrodynamic analog to measure the medium deformation resistance
is the second or volume viscosity. During the volumetric deformation,
the fracture area is an unloaded structure without well-defined
boundaries with multiply connected space topology. Volumetric
deformation is accompanied by the change of substance average
density. In a sedimentary cover, such a change of a structure causes
porosity decrease. In deep layers it may cause phase transfer. For
example, it may lead to the transformation of quartz to its more dense
modification, coesite and stishovite. The absence of the defined
direction and the corresponding resonance structure becomes apparent
in the diffusive character of deformation emission spectrum. The
volumetric deformation corresponds to a potential component of
stress-deformation field.</p>
      <p>Shear deformation occurs under the effect of a pair of tangential
oppositely directed stresses and is the manifestation of vertex
component of stress-deformation field.</p>
      <p>The measure of resistance of such a deformation in hydrodynamics is
the dynamic viscosity. In contrast to the volumetric deformation, the
shear one is characterized by a clear space anisotropy defined mainly
by stress field structure. Usually it has a well-defined slip plane
coinciding with the plane of the largest tangential stresses. The
region of shear deformation has simply connected space topology. From
the radiophysical point of view, it is a resonance structure, the
eigen frequencies of which are determined by rock properties,
dimension and configuration of a fracture region which may be excited
during tectonic stress relaxation.</p>
      <p>Friction, appearing during mutual displacement of two rock blocks,
refers to so called “dry” friction, in which static friction is less
than dynamic friction. This property causes self-induced
vibrations. The classical example is the vibration of a violin string
under the effect of evenly moving bow (Andronov and Zhurevlev, 2010).</p>
      <p>Generation self-induced vibrations to appear requires the following:</p>
      <p><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p>energy source and sink at different energy levels, during the
transition between which dissipation work is performed,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>vibrational structure,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>positive feedback.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list>All these components present during shear rock deformation under the
tectonic stress:</p>
      <p><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>
            <p>the source is tectonic stress force the most vividly manifesting
itself in seismically active regions,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>the result of dissipation is transformed rock,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>shear fracture region is a vibrational structure,</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>positive feedback is the result of control of the break-away
torque by acoustic disturbance.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list>The scenario for stress dissipation consists of a series of randomly
occurring avalanche processes. It its turn, each avalanche process is
a series of discrete acts of relaxation.</p>
      <p>Just like in the case with a violin string, rock local stresses have
a constant, determined in this case by the force of tectonic origin,
and a variable, associated with resonance vibrations of fracture
cavity, density-stress waves.</p>
      <p>The starting of the initial relaxation act occurs when the damage
threshold is exceeded by constant stress.</p>
      <p>The initial relaxation act starts when the sum of constant and
fluctuating stress exceed the damage threshold. It provides the
starting of relaxation acts at the moments of achievement of the
damage threshold value by the summary stress, and the beginning of
acts with the frequencies of eigen vibrations of the fracture area,
generation of relaxation self-induced vibrations. During the starting,
accelerated motion of dislocation edges under the effect of
accumulated stress in rock and decrease of dry friction coefficient
during the increase of deformation rate are observed.</p>
      <p>Simultaneously with that, redistribution of stress from the periphery
to the fracture area takes place. At the beginning of the process, the
density of the accumulated elastic energy in the vicinity of the
fracture zone is maximal. Development of the process is accompanied by
the transformation of elastic energy to the work on rock fracture and
decrease of the accumulated stress potential energy.</p>
      <p>It stops when the sum of brake, inertia and stress forces is equal to
zero.</p>
      <p>During stress dissipation with the increase of the dimension of
deformation cavity, the eigen frequencies of fracture cavity and the
frequency of repetition of relaxation acts decrease. It completely
agrees with the observation results illustrated in Figs. 3–1 and
3–2.</p>
      <p>To estimate the parameters of fracture cavity, a simple model, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
length string, is used.</p>
      <p>Its vibration frequency is determined by the expression
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sound velocity in
a medium, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the harmonic number. Hence, we obtain that the crack
length is determined by the relation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming the
sound velocity in rock to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>3000</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we
obtain that during the relaxation process, when the first harmonic
frequency changes from 100 to 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, cavity dimensions
increase from 15 to 22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Of course, this simplest estimation is not accurate since it does not
take into account a number of important moments, such as fracture
cavity form and dimensions, effect of the transformed rock filling
this cavity, surface wave features and so on.</p>
      <p>It should be noted, that earthquakes accompanied by fracture opening
contain all the components of the phenomenon described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The paper briefly describes borehole radiophysical properties
consideration of which improves the efficiency of investigations.</p>
      <p>The results of registration of acoustic-electromagnetic radiation,
carried out in a borehole in a seismically active region, showed the
presence of anomalously high signals exceeding the background value by
10–20 times.</p>
      <p>The observed anomalies of both acoustic and electromagnetic radiations
have lithospheric origin and are associated with tectonic stress
relaxation.</p>
      <p>Four main types of acoustic-electromagnetic radiation anomalies were
distinguished. They correspond to shear and bulk relaxations of
tectonic stresses.</p>
      <p>Stability of phase relations of acoustic and electromagnetic signals
in anomalies was detected, that indicates their coherence. The
acoustic signal advance of electromagnetic signal shows the primary
nature of the acoustic signal.</p>
      <p>It was concluded that the cause for the mutual coherence of acoustic
and electromagnetic signals is the magnetoelastic effect of the casing
pipe.</p>
      <p>The mechanism for generation of rock self-induced vibrations during
tectonic stress relaxation, causing the appearance of
acoustic-electromagnetic emission, was suggested.</p>
      <p>“Sigmoid” anomalies may be compared with excitation of eigen
vibrations of a fracture cavity during brittle shear relaxation of
rock tectonic stress.</p>
      <p>The frequency change of “sigmoid” anomalous signal is explained as
the result of growth of rock fracture cavity and decrease of tectonic
stress relaxation.</p>
      <p>A borehole cased in a steel pipe together
with an induction coil system and a hydrophone is the effective
sounding sensor for the acoustic field of interior deep layers. It may
be applied to investigate and to monitor the geodynamic activity, in
particular, in earthquake forecasts and in monitoring of hydrocarbon
deposits during their production.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The work is partially supported by RFBR Grant 13–02-01159.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andronov, V. V. and Zhuravlev, V. F.: Sukhoe trenie v zadachakh mekhaniki
(Dry friction in mechanics problems), Moscow-Izhevsk, NITs “Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika”, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Athy, L. F.: Density, porosity and compactation of sedimentary rocks, A. A. P. G. Bull., 14, 1–24, 1930.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Engelgard, V.: Porovoe prostranstvo osadochnykh porod (Porous space of sedimentaries), Moscow, (Translated from German), 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Gavrilov, V. A. and Morozova Yu. V.: Osnovnye svoistva
geoakusticheskoi emissii po rezul'tatam nablyudenii v glubokoi
skvazhine G-1 (Main properties of geoacoustic emission according to
the observation results in a deep borehole G-1), Sovremennyi vulkanizm
i svyazannye s nim protsessy (Modern volcanism and processes associated with it), 44–47, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Gavrilov, V. A., Panteleev, I. A., Ryabinin, G. V., and Morozova, Yu. V.: Modulating impact of
electromagnetic radiation on geoacoustic emission of rocks, russian journal of earth sciences, 13, ES1002,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2205/2013ES000527">10.2205/2013ES000527</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Hadjicontis, V., C. Mavromatou, C., Antsygina, T. N.,
and Chishko, K. A.: Mechanism of electromagnetic emission in plastically
deformed ionic crystals, Phys. Rev. B, 76,  024106
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.024106">10.1103/PhysRevB.76.024106</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Jiles, D. C.: Theory of the magnetomechanical effect,  J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., 28, 1537–1546, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
King, R. and Schmidt, G.: Antenny v material'nykh sredakh (Antennas in
material mediums), V.1, 2, Mir, Moscow, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Mori, Y., Obata, Y., and Sikula, J.: Acoustic and electromagnetic emission from crack created
in rock sample under deformation, J. Acousic Emision, 27, 157–166, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Sikula, J., Mori, Y.,  Lokajicek, T., Koktavy, P., Majzner, J., and
Sedlak, P.: Crack creation kinetics characterization by
electromagnetic and acoustic emission, in: Proc. 28th European Conf. AE
Testing, Kracov, Poland, September, 118–123, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Skvazhinnaya i shakhtnaya geofizika: Spravochnik geofizika (Borehole
and shaft Geophysics), V.2, Nedra, Moscow, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Sobolev, G. A. and Ponomarev, A. V.: Fizika zemletryasenii i
predvestniki (Physics of earthquakes and precursors), Nauka, Moscow, 270 pp., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Uvarov, V. N.: Elektromagnitnoe proyavlenie litosfery v SNCh-ONCh
diapazone (Electromagnetic effect of the lithosphere in ELF-VLF
range), Geofizicheskii zhurnal, Geophys. J.+, 34, 134–146, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Uvarov, V. N., Druzhin, G. I., and Sannikov, D. V.: Electromagnetic
Radiation of Lithospheric origin, Method for Detection and First
Results, Instruments and Axperimental Techniques, Pleiades Publishing Ltd., 53, 895–901, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Uvarov V. N., Druzhin, G. I., Sannikov, D. V.,
Pukhov, V. M. et. al.:
Sposob passivnoi lokatsii blizko raspolozhennykh istochnikov
elektromagnitnogo izlucheniya na fone moshchnykh izluchenii udalennykh
istochnikov (The way of passive location of closely located sources of
electromagnetic radiation at the background of powerful radiation from
remote sources), Patent RF, no. 2473101, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Averaged spectra of initial signals. 1 – acoustic signal
spectrum; 2 – noise signal spectrum; 3 – mixture signal spectrum;
4 – industrial noise frequencies; 5 – borehole acoustic resonances.
</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>An example of spectrochronogram for lithosphere acoustic
(top) and electromagnetic (bottom) signal variations. They are
connected by vertical lines on the figure. Indications of the
lithospherics correspond to their types. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015-f02.jpg"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Types of lithospheric signal. 1 – “monosigmoid”, 2 –
“polysigmoid”, 3 – “trill”, 4 – “roar”. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015-f03.jpg"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Phase relations of anomalies of different acoustic and
electromagnetic signals (Lissajous figures). In horizontal direction
is the electromagnetic signal amplitude. In vertical direction is
the acoustic signal amplitude. 1 – “monosigmoid”, 2 –
“polysigmoid”, 3 – “trill”, 4 – “roar”.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/7/1447/2015/sed-7-1447-2015-f04.jpg"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
