Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-129
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-129

  03 Aug 2020

03 Aug 2020

Review status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal SE.

Stress rotation – The impact and interaction of rock stiffness and faults

Karsten Reiter Karsten Reiter
  • TU Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstraße 9

Abstract. It has been assumed, that the maximum compressive horizontal stress (SHmax) orientation in the upper crust is governed on a regional scale by the same forces that drive plate motion. However, several regions are identified, where stress orientation deviates from the expected orientation due to plate boundary forces (first order stress sources), or the plate wide pattern. In some of this regions a gradual rotation of the SHmax orientation has been observed.

Several second and third order stress sources have been identified, which may explain stress rotation in the upper crust. For example lateral heterogeneities in the crust, such as density, petrophysical or petrothermal properties and discontinuities, like faults are identified as potential candidates to cause lateral stress rotations. To investigate several of the candidates, generic geomechanical numerical models are utilized. These models consist of up to five different units, oriented by an angle of 60° to the direction of contraction. These units have variable elastic material properties, such as Young's modulus, Poisson ratio and density. Furthermore, the units can be separated by contact surfaces that allow them so slide along these faults, depending on a selected coefficient of friction.

The model results indicate, that a density contrast or the variation of the Poisson's ratio alone sparsely rotates the horizontal stress orientation (≦ 17°). Conversely, a contrast of the Young's modulus allows significant stress rotations in the order of up to 78°; not only areas in the vicinity of the material transition are affected by that stress rotation. Stress rotation clearly decreases for the same stiffness contrast, when the units are separated by low friction discontinuities (19°). Low friction discontinuities in homogeneous models do not change the stress pattern at all, away from the fault; the stress pattern is nearly identical to a model without any active faults. This indicates that material contrasts are capable of producing significant stress rotation for larger areas in the crust. Active faults that separates such material contrasts have the opposite effect, they rather compensate stress rotations.

Karsten Reiter

 
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for authors/topical editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Karsten Reiter

Karsten Reiter

Viewed

Total article views: 494 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
372 116 6 494 3 3
  • HTML: 372
  • PDF: 116
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 494
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Aug 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Aug 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 450 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 449 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Mar 2021
Download
Short summary
The influence and interaction of elastic material properties (Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio), density and low frictional faults on the resulting far-field stress pattern in the Earth's crust is tested with generic models. A Young's modulus contrast can lead to a significant stress rotation. Discontinuities with low friction in homogeneous models change the stress pattern only slightly, away from the fault. In addition, active discontinuities are able to compensate stress rotation.