Solid Earth
Solid Earth
SE
Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
Research article
 | 
30 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 30 Mar 2021

The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea

Jennifer E. Cunningham, Nestor Cardozo, Chris Townsend, and Richard H. T. Callow

Viewed

Total article views: 4,738 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,770 1,877 91 4,738 125 162
  • HTML: 2,770
  • PDF: 1,877
  • XML: 91
  • Total: 4,738
  • BibTeX: 125
  • EndNote: 162
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,738 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,543 with geography defined and 195 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 30 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This work investigates the impact of commonly used seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults. Fault analysis refers to fault length, displacement, and the impact these factors have on geological modelling and hydrocarbon volume calculation workflows. This research was conducted to give geoscientists a better understanding of the importance of interpretation methods and the impact of unsuitable methology on geological analyses.
Read more
Share