the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Importance of basement faulting and salt decoupling for the structural evolution of the Fars Arc (Zagros fold-and-thrust belt): a numerical modeling approach
Mahdi Najafi
Farhad Sobouti
Understanding the tectonic evolution and crustal-scale structure of fold-and-thrust belts is crucial for exploring geological resources and evaluating seismic hazards. We conducted a series of two-dimensional finite difference thermomechanical numerical models with a visco–elasto–plastic/brittle rheology to decipher how the interaction between inherited basement faults and salt décollement levels control the deformation process and structural style of the Fars Arc in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt during tectonic inversion. Numerical experiments with extension and consequent convergence phases indicate that strain accumulation patterns during initial rifting are controlled by the location and geometry of the prescribed faults. During convergence, the inverted basement faults form large-wavelength and foreland-verging fault-propagation anticlines in the sedimentary cover, while the thick salt layer promotes the growth of second-order detachment anticlines accompanied by both fore- and back-limb thrust faults. Experiments without prescribed basement faults result in dispersed brittle/plastic deformation during rifting and convergence and an effective mechanical decoupling along the salt horizon. Overall, reactivated faults can serve as pathways for stress transfer, resulting in the formation of new faults triggering seismic activity. The structural evolution of orogenic belts like the Zagros does not adhere to a fixed pattern; it is shaped by factors such as basement rock properties and inherited fault orientations. Shallow earthquakes predominantly occur along décollement anticlines in the sedimentary cover, while deeper and larger ones are associated with basement faults. We also observe variations in resistance to deformation based on salt rheology and fault geometry, with listric faults minimizing resistance. The degree of basement involvement directly influences the model's resistance to deformation, with greater involvement facilitating easier deformation. Our results, related to the temporal and spatial relationship between thin- and thick-skinned tectonics, can work as analogues for similar orogenic belts worldwide, such as Taiwan, the Pyrenees, the Alps, the Appalachians, and the Kopet Dagh.
- Article
(13441 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(302 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Fold-and-thrust belts are complex tectonic domains formed in response to near- or far-field compressional stress fields in the Earth's crust. Multiple factors have been identified to control the structural styles in these belts, such as the strength of the involved rocks (Davis et al., 1983), the involvement of the crystalline basement and its pre-existing faults (Pfiffner, 2017; Barchi and Tavarelli, 2022), the occurrence and rheology of décollement layers (Ruh et al., 2012; Pla et al., 2019; Eslamirezaei et al., 2023), and the intensity of surface processes (Talbot and Alavi, 1996; Cooper, 2007; Simpson, 2010; Malavieille and Konstantinovskaya, 2010; Morley et al., 2011; McQuarrie and Ehlers, 2017). In particular, the presence of décollements, mechanically weak layers composed of rocks that have lower mechanical strength than their surroundings, plays a significant role in the formation and evolution of fold-and-thrust belts. These layers are weak stratigraphic horizons that separate and mechanically decouple layers of greater strength and tend to accommodate and localize the deformation (Koyi and Mansurbeg, 2021). The relative weakness of décollement levels arises from variations in lithology (i.e., layer-parallel décollements) or structural features (i.e., inherited faults) that often promote the localization of deformation as a result of increased stress contrasts and lower strength thresholds (Vogt et al., 2017; Borderie et al., 2018). The lithology of a décollement layer (salt, anhydrite, gypsum, or shale), its stratigraphic position in the rock sequence (basal or middle), its thickness, and its fluid content control the distribution and geometry of faulting and folding during crustal convergence (Simpson, 2009; Ruh et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014; Santolaria et al., 2022). Décollement layers with a certain thickness may lead to the formation of single-layer detachment folds (Mitra, 2003; Wallace and Homza, 1998). Furthermore, multiple décollement horizons within a shortened sedimentary sequence may connect along thrust faults and form structural ramp–flat geometries (Boyer and Elliott, 1982; Dal Zilio, 2020).
Besides weak layers within the stratigraphy, pre-existing basement faults, inherited from older tectonic events, can influence the location and geometry of new faults and folds and their propagation and termination in the overlying sedimentary cover by serving as zones of weakness during compressional deformation. This ultimately affects the overall structural architecture of a fold-and-thrust belt (Bonini et al., 2012; Granado and Ruh, 2019; Parizot et al., 2022). The effects of fault inheritance can be complex and dependent on various factors, such as the orientation, dip, geometry, and depth of the inherited structures (White et al., 1986), the timing and style of subsequent deformation (Zwaan et al., 2022), and the mechanical properties of the rocks involved (Ruh and Vergés, 2018).
The Fars Arc, located in the southeastern part of the Zagros orogen (Fig. 1), offers an ideal area to study the combined influence of the cover's mechanical stratigraphy. and basement inheritance. It is a typical example of a fold-and-thrust belt that contains multiple mechanically weak stratigraphic layers in the Phanerozoic sedimentary cover, as well as pre-existing inherited faults in the Precambrian crustal basement (Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Mouthereau et al., 2006; Yamato et al., 2011; Karasözen et al., 2019; Najafi et al., 2021). According to seismic, well-logging, and surface geological data, the Ediacaran–Lower Cambrian Hormuz series constitutes the main décollement in the Fars Arc. It consists of ∼ 2 km of salt-bearing evaporites, with minor carbonate and shale layers, and decouples the crustal basement from the overlying sedimentary cover (Kent, 1958; Sherkati et al., 2005; Callot et al., 2007; Leturmy et al., 2010). The presence of a thick salt layer at the base of the sedimentary cover in the Fars Arc is responsible for short-wavelength folds (Mouthereau et al., 2006). In some places, its basal décollement is spatially interrupted by basement faults related to the Cenozoic convergence (Kent, 1958; Talbot and Alavi, 1996; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Sherkati et al., 2005; Callot et al., 2007). The recent activity of these faults in the Fars Arc is documented by seismological data (Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian and King, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Tatar et al., 2004; Karasözen et al., 2019; Nissen et al., 2019). Focal mechanisms of seismic events in the basement exhibit rather steep fault dip angles, suggesting the reactivation of inherited normal faults (Jackson, 1980).
In the Fars Arc, the activity of inherited faults has influenced the progression of deformation towards the foreland, with the Mountain Front Fault being associated with basement thrusting (Bahroudi and Koyi, 2003; Mouthereau et al., 2006, 2007a; Yamato et al., 2011; Ruh et al., 2014; Najafi et al., 2021). According to Mouthereau et al. (2006), basement deformation and thickening play a critical role in the Zagros Folded Belt, helping to explain the observed topographic growth. They also emphasize that the reactivation of pre-existing faults during the early stages of compression in the Zagros foredeep suggests a significant influence of inherited structural features on present-day deformation. Balanced cross sections support this by demonstrating that basement involvement is necessary to account for varying base topographic elevations in Paleozoic and Mesozoic formations (Blanc et al., 2003; Molinaro et al., 2005; Mouthereau et al., 2007a). However, other studies propose that the most substantial impact of basement deformation on surface structures occurred later in the region's tectonic history, particularly during the Pliocene and Pleistocene (Molinaro et al., 2005; Sherkati et al., 2005; Tavani et al., 2018; Vergés et al., 2011; Najafi et al., 2018; Etemad-saeed et al., 2020). It is widely accepted that the high-angle reverse faults initially formed as normal faults in the Arabian basement during the Permian–Triassic rifting of the Neo-Tethys Ocean (Navabpour et al., 2010), remaining inactive through the Jurassic to Late Cretaceous passive margin phase before being reactivated during the Cenozoic collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates.
Various 2D numerical modeling studies have investigated the evolution of fold-and-thrust belts and salt-bearing basins. Nilforoushan et al. (2013) demonstrated the influence of geothermal gradients and basement mineralogy on fault geometry and basement reactivation in the Fars Arc, emphasizing the role of weak salt horizons in mechanical decoupling. Heydarzadeh et al. (2020) analyzed factors such as sedimentation rates, erosion, and salt layer properties in Dehdasht Basin, highlighting the importance of balanced surface processes and deformation rates. Humair et al. (2020) conducted simulations to study the interaction of folding and thrusting during the Swiss Jura and Canadian Foothills fold-and-thrust belt evolution, focusing on the effects of layer-parallel shortening and initial geometrical perturbations. Their work showed that the magnitude of these perturbations influences whether folding or thrusting predominates, affecting the structural evolution and asymmetry of anticlines. Spitz et al. (2020) conducted 3D thermomechanical numerical simulations to investigate the influence of laterally variable inherited structures on fold-and-thrust belt evolution and nappe formation on the Helvetic nappe system. The study demonstrated the fundamental importance of tectonic inheritance on fold-and-thrust belt evolution, with strain localization, folding, and nappe transport controlled by initial geometrical and mechanical heterogeneities. Almost all studies have focused on examining the collisional phase and deformation resulting from compression in the fold belts and the Fars Arc, while the earlier extensional history and its effect on later deformation have received less attention (e.g., Granado and Ruh, 2019). Incorporating a rifting phase into the model setup results in more realistic initial conditions for the convergence stage, featuring variations in crustal thickness, rift-related sedimentary basins, and the presence of weak zones.
The interaction of the basal décollement level and the pre-existing basement faults and their combined influence on the distribution of thin- and thick-skinned tectonic styles in the Fars Arc during extensional and compressional phases are not fully understood yet. Understanding these processes is crucial for improving our geological models of the region, which have significant implications for hydrocarbon exploration. Although there is a general consensus on the importance of the décollement layer and basement faults, the detailed dynamics and their broader impact on regional tectonics require further investigation during inversion tectonics.
The goal of our study is to test the impact of the Hormuz salt and the mechanical properties and geometries of the basement faults inherited from the Permian continental rifting on the structural evolution of the Fars Arc. To achieve this goal, we conducted a series of two-dimensional thermomechanical numerical experiments to investigate how the presence or absence of fault inheritance (planar or listric) controls the deformation during rifting and subsequent tectonic shortening. Furthermore, we test the effect of a weak intermediate salt décollement of variable rheology on the structural evolution during convergence.
The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt (ZFTB) is a NW–SE-trending orogenic belt that resulted from the convergence and continental collision between Arabian and Eurasian plates (Agard et al., 2011; Mouthereau et al., 2012; Vergés et al., 2024). The ZFTB extends over approximately 2000 km from the Taurus Mountains in Türkiye in the northwest to the Makran accretionary wedge in southeastern Iran (Fig. 1). Across-strike, the ZFTB is bounded by the Main Zagros Thrust (i.e., the inherited suture of the old subduction zone) in the northeast, and by the Zagros Frontal Fault system in the southwest (Fig. 1b).
The NE margin of the Arabian Plate has been shaped by a series of tectonic events that ultimately resulted in the emergence of the ZFTB (Agard et al., 2011; Vergés et al., 2024; Madanipour et al., 2024), namely (1) the Permian–Triassic rifting and opening of the NW–SE-trending Neo-Tethys Ocean, (2) the Jurassic–Late Cretaceous passive marginal stage, (3) the Late Cretaceous ophiolite obduction, (4) the Oligocene soft continental collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates, and (5) the middle Miocene-to-recent folding propagation across the mountain range.
The Permian–Triassic opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean separated the Arabian Plate to the southwest from the Iranian microplate to the northeast (Szabo and Kheradpir, 1978; Berberian and King, 1981; Agard et al., 2005). Lithospheric extension related to continental rifting deformed the Arabian crystalline basement and produced a series of NW-trending half-grabens parallel to the current orientation of the Zagros orogen (e.g., Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Mouthereau et al., 2007a). Following the rifting episode, the Arabian margin became passive during the Jurassic and Cretaceous (e.g., Alavi, 2004; Agard et al., 2005). An early stage of contractional deformation occurred in the Late Cretaceous with the obduction of the Neo-Tethys ophiolite and radiolarite slices onto the Arabian margin, presently preserved in Kermanshah, Neyriz, and Hajiabad (Agard et al., 2005; Saura et al., 2011; Bernaola et al., 2011).
From the Oligocene onward, continental collision led to the formation of the ZFTB, while being age-constrained by recent thermochronometric and magnetostratigraphic data (Pirouz et al., 2017; Koshnaw et al., 2019; Barber et al., 2019). The main phase of folding in the Zagros took place during the Miocene to Pleistocene and progressively propagated to the SW (Hessami et al., 2001; Khadivi et al., 2010; Mouthereau et al., 2012; Ruh et al., 2014; Vergés et al., 2019; Najafi et al., 2021). GPS measurements indicate that the present-day convergence rate is approximately 20–30 mm yr−1 in a roughly N–S direction, of which ∼ 6.5 ± 2 mm yr−1 is being consumed across the Zagros (Nilforoushan et al., 2003; Walpersdorf et al., 2006).
Based on its structural and stratigraphic characterizations, the Zagros is divided into the High Zagros imbricated zone in the NE and the Zagros Simply Folded Belt (ZSFB) in the SW and separated by the High Zagros Fault (Fig. 1). The ZSFB extends to the Persian Gulf and the present-day Mesopotamian foredeep basin. It represents the deformed foreland of the orogeny and displays elongated folds of regular wavelength (Falcon, 1974; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Mouthereau et al., 2006). The ZSFB consists of a sedimentary sequence 8–14 km thick covering metamorphosed rocks of the Precambrian Arabian basement (Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Lacombe et al., 2011). Based on lateral stratigraphic and structural variations, the ZSFB is divided from NW to SE into the Lurestan Arc, the Izeh zone, the Dezful Embayment, and the Fars Arc (Fig. 1).
In this study, we focus on the Fars Arc, the largest tectonic domain of the ZSFB that is limited by the Kazerun–Borazjan segmented dextral fault system to the west and the Minab–Zendan–Palami fault system to the east (Fig. 1b; Regard et al., 2004; Lacombe et al., 2011). The Fars Arc extends over more than 300 km across-strike, is ∼ 200 km wide from the High Zagros Fault to the deformation front, and developed as a result of folding of the thick sedimentary cover (Stöcklin, 1974; Berberian and King, 1981). Its elongated folds show a distinctive periodic pattern, with axial lengths reaching to 200 km and wavelengths of ∼ 15 km (Fig. 1c; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Najafi et al., 2021). The Fars Arc is scattered with salt diapirs, with a majority of them located in the eastern part of the arc (Sherkati et al., 2006; Callot et al., 2007).
The stratigraphy of the Fars Arc contains a major basal layer and several minor intermediate mechanically weak décollement layers (Fig. 2). Near the base of the sedimentary cover, the ∼ 2 km thick salt-bearing evaporites of Hormuz Formation of Ediacaran–Early Cambrian age overlay early Ediacaran sediments (Callot et al., 2007). The 3 km thick Paleozoic sequence is dominantly composed of sandstone, dolomite, and shale. The Dehram Group, with a thickness of more than 1 km, was deposited during the Permian–Triassic. The Triassic Dashtak Formation of 550–850 m thickness overlies the Dehram Group and is the minor intermediate décollement level in the frontal Fars Arc (Motamedi et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014). It laterally grades into the dolomites of the Khaneh Kat Formation in the interior of the range, where it loses its efficiency as a décollement level (Szabo and Kheradpir, 1978). During the passive marginal stage in the Jurassic–Late Cretaceous, the Zagros basin was characterized by a shallow-marine environment, when the 2 km thick carbonate and minor detrital and evaporite successions of the Khami and Bangestan groups were deposited (Sharp et al., 2010).
The Neo-Tethyan oceanic crust was obducted over the Arabian Plate margin during the Late Cretaceous, and loading resulted in the flexure of the Arabian lithosphere. This produced an early foreland basin in the Lurestan region of NW Zagros, referred to as the Amiran foreland basin by Homke et al. (2009) and Saura et al. (2011). The thick successions of deep-water shales of the Paleocene to Eocene formations indicate regional subsidence. The passive margin succession of the Paleocene to Miocene sediments has a thickness of ∼ 3 km (Jahani et al., 2009; Najafi et al., 2014). In the Oligocene, the Asmari Formation was deposited over the Pabdeh Formation in the Fars region. The post-Asmari clastics, known as the Fars Group, including the Gachsaran, Mishan, and Aghajari formations (early Miocene to Pliocene), have a total thickness of about 3 km. Migration of the Aghajari–Bakhtyari sedimentary system towards the foreland and the propagation of folding were in sequence. They have migrated at a rate of 20 mm yr−1 in the Fars Arc and 15 mm yr−1 in the Lurestan Arc during the last 20 Myr (Ruh et al., 2014; Vergés et al., 2019).
In the Fars Arc, two main décollement levels occur in the stratigraphy (Fig. 2); the Hormuz Formation represents the basal and the major décollement level, and the evaporites of the Dashtak Formation constitute a minor intermediate décollement level (Callot et al., 2012; Motamedi et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014).
Seismic activity at mid-crustal depths provides key evidence of basement involvement in the Zagros. Most earthquake centroid depths range from 4 to 25 km, affecting both the basement and cover, with many exhibiting reverse focal mechanisms (Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Karasözen et al., 2019). In the Fars Arc, the major inherited basement reverse faults from SW to NE include the Mountain Front Fault, the Surmeh Fault, the High Zagros Fault, and the Main Zagros Thrust (Fig. 1c). A geological cross section of the Fars Arc reveals evidence of both thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonic deformation occurring simultaneously (Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Najafi et al., 2021; Fig. 1c). This deformation is expressed through large-scale detachment folds and forced folds (Jackson, 1980; Lacombe et al., 2011; Mouthereau et al., 2012).
While numerous studies have focused on the Zagros fold-and-thrust belts and the Fars Arc, several crucial aspects of the Fars Arc's geological evolution remain poorly understood. Specifically, the exact mechanisms and timing of basement involvement, the interaction between basement faults and salt décollements during tectonic inversion, and the relative influence of thin-skinned versus thick-skinned tectonics on the overall structural evolution are still unresolved (Mouthereau et al., 2006, 2012). To address these uncertainties, we employ a numerical model that simulates the full tectonic history of the Fars Arc, including both an initial extensional phase and a subsequent compressional phase.
In order to investigate the role of inherited extensional faults and mechanically weak décollement horizons in the structural evolution of the Fars Arc, a series of numerical experiments were conducted. We apply the two-dimensional finite difference numerical code “Norma” (Ruh et al., 2022), with a fully staggered Eulerian grid, freely moving Lagrangian markers (marker-in-cell technique; Gerya, 2019), and a temperature-dependent visco–elasto–plastic/brittle rheology.
3.1 Governing equations
The numerical code solves for the conservation of mass and momentum (the Stokes equation) on a Eulerian grid to calculate the velocity and pressure fields
and
where vi and xi are velocities and spatial coordinates, p the dynamic pressure (mean stress), τij the deviatoric stresses, ρ the density (constant), and gi the gravitational acceleration (g1 = 0; g2 = 9.8 m s−2). Temperature is solved by considering the energy conservation on the Eulerian grid,
where Cp is isobaric heat capacity, is the total time derivative, T is temperature, t is time, and κ is the thermal conductivity coefficient. Additional heat production, such as radioactive heating and shear heating, is not activated in the presented experiments due to the geometrical constraints of the model setup and related boundary conditions that affect the diffusion of such secondary heat production.
The pressure and temperature fields calculated from the governing equations are interpolated onto the Lagrangian markers based on a linear distance-weighted scheme (Gerya, 2019). The Lagrangian markers store all material properties and advect through the Eulerian grid based on a fourth-order Runge–Kutta interpolation of the calculated two-directional Eulerian velocity field.
3.2 Rheological model
The numerical code employs a visco–elasto–plastic/brittle rheology, where viscoelasticity is implemented by a Maxwell-type expression. Elasticity plays a key role in capturing short-term stress accumulation and release, which is crucial for fault and fold behavior. The Maxwell model allows the simulation of the immediate elastic response and long-term viscous flow, ensuring that important transient phenomena such as fault reactivation and seismic activity are accurately represented during both extension and convergence. The strain rate of a Maxwell body under stress consists of viscous and elastic components,
where G is the elastic shear (100 GPa for all materials here), and η is the effective viscosity. First-order finite differences in time are used to represent the objective co-rotational time derivatives of the viscoelastic stresses as follows:
The effective viscosity η is calculated from the non-Newtonian dislocation, ηdisl, creep equation,
where
and R, AD, n, and Q are the gas constant, the pre-exponential factor, the power law constant, and the thermal activation energy, respectively. Elastic behavior is achieved by updating the effective viscosity in response to an elastic time step (Maxwell time; Δte = 1000 years) and the stress history (Gerya and Yuen, 2007; Moresi et al., 2007, 2003). The updated viscoelastic deviatoric stresses are defined by
where
The effective viscosity is multiplied by this viscoelastic factor (Z) to obtain a numerical viscosity ηnum to be used for solving the set of equations as follows:
Plastic failure occurs if the second invariant of the viscoelastic stress tensor exceeds the yield stress, σy, following a pressure-dependent Drucker–Prager criterion:
where p is the pressure (mean stress), and c, φ, and λ, are the cohesion, friction angle, and the fluid pressure ratio of the bulk material, respectively. The components of stress (σxx is the normal stress component, and σxy is the shear stress component) and the viscosity are then updated as
where
The viscosities, including the viscoelastic effect and the plastic failure, are calculated on the Lagrangian markers and interpolated onto the Eulerian nodes using a distance-weighted scheme. To ensure numerical stability, they are capped by lower and upper cutoffs of 1017 and 1025 Pa s, respectively. Given the numerical time step of Δte = 1000 years, material undergoing deformation at viscosities below 3.16 × 1021 Pa s can be considered predominantly viscous, while deformation at viscosities above 3.16 × 1021 Pa s is to a significant part elastic and thus reversible. Elastic relaxation time varies between ∼ 1 year and 1 million years, depending on the viscosity of the material, which results in Deborah numbers of 10−7–0.1 for a deformation period of 10 million years.
3.3 Initial geometrical setup
The model domain is defined by a box of 500 km width and 60 km height (Fig. 3a). The Eulerian grid consists of 1001 × 121 nodes, with a nodal resolution of 500 × 500 m. The initial marker distribution defines, from bottom up, (1) a 30 km thick crustal basement layer, given the depth of basement crustal detachment (Vergés et al., 2011; Kendall et al., 2020); (2) a mechanically weak salt horizon emplaced between 100 km < x < 450 km; (3) a 3 km thick Paleozoic sequence based on the stratigraphy of the Fars Arc; and (4) a 25 km thick low-density and low-viscosity sticky-air layer to simulate a free surface, allowing for the vertical growth of the evolving fold-and-thrust belt (Crameri et al., 2012). The thickness of the salt layer varies in different models in order to examine its impact on the structural evolution. Some experiments include three inherited basement faults located at x = 100, 200, and 350 km (top of the basement), which dip at an angle of 50° at their top towards the hinterland (Mouthereau et al., 2006). These weak zones may either have a listric or planar geometry. The rheological parameters used in the experiments are provided in Table 1. Strain weakening is implemented by a linear decrease in the values for the frictional angle (φ) and cohesion (c) between a lower and upper strain threshold as defined by the second invariant of the strain tensor and .
The initial temperature field is characterized by a linear temperature increase with depth, starting from 0 °C at the interface between rock and sticky air and reaching 600 °C at the bottom, which is in agreement with a constant geothermal gradient of 20 ° km−1 inferred from paleothermal data (Aldega et al., 2018) and a relatively thick lithosphere (∼ 200 km) beneath the Zagros (Jiménez-Munt et al., 2012; Priestley et al., 2012; Tunini et al., 2014). Applying a linear geotherm is a reasonable simplification for the uppermost ∼ 50 km of the continental lithosphere (Hasterok and Chapman, 2011; Goes et al., 2020). Each Eulerian cell initially contains 16 randomly distributed Lagrangian markers carrying rock information and properties. If the finite spatial domains of a specific node become empty of any Lagrangian marker, the previous interpolated parameters are applied for solving the system of equation of this particular node.
3.4 Boundary conditions
The numerical experiments simulate the deformation of the NE margin of the Arabian Plate during Permian–Triassic rifting and Oligocene–recent continental collision. Tectonic quiescence affects the thermal state and, consequently, the rheological behavior of the rocks. However, we assume that the temperature field reached a steady state by the onset of the collision phase to simplify the model setup. This implementation allows us to effectively capture the relevant thermal conditions, while maintaining focus on the critical dynamics of the extension and collision phases. The velocity boundary conditions are prescribed in a way to simulate the tectonic inversion of the rifted margin, including the initial extension and subsequent convergence. During the rifting phase, an outward horizontal boundary velocity of vx = 5 mm yr−1 is applied on the right side of the model domain, while the left boundary is kept fixed in horizontal direction (Fig. 3a). The bottom boundary has zero vertical velocity, and the top boundary has an incoming vertical velocity of vy = 0.6 mm yr−1, ensuring the conservation of the volume within the model domain (Fig. 3a). On all boundaries, free-slip conditions (zero shear stress) are prescribed. The finite Eulerian domain impedes elastic bending of the lower boundary, affecting the resulting surface taper angles compared to the ZFTB (Mouthereau et al., 2006; McQuarrie, 2004). The extension phase is applied for a period of 5 Myr, resulting in a total extension of 25 km. During this period, the rift basin is allowed to be filled with syn-rift deposits (equivalent to the Dashtak and Dehram formations). Following the extension phase, 4 km of sediments representing the depositional environment during the tectonic quiescence and subsidence period are added onto the existing stratigraphy (Fig. 3b). These sediments represent the Khami and Bangestan groups and the Gurpi and Pabdeh formations (Fig. 2). The Late Cretaceous ophiolite obduction episode has affected only some parts of the Arabian margin, namely the Kermanshah, Neyriz, Hajiabad, and Oman regions. We have not included the Late Cretaceous deformation in our modeling, as it accounts for just a few percent of the observed shortening in the ZSFB (e.g., Saura et al., 2011).
Crustal shortening in the experiments is simulated by imposing a horizontal velocity of 1 cm yr−1 at the bottom and the left side of the domain. The right side acts as a partial backstop by allowing the basement part of the crust to escape the model but prevents the sedimentary cover from exiting. For the lower part of the right boundary (basement), different horizontal velocities between 0 and 1 cm yr−1 are tested (Fig. 3b). This arrangement permits us to vary the degree of basement involvement and to study the development of thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonics in the model. The compressional phase ran for 15 Myr, accommodating a total shortening of 25 % (i.e., 125 km), This amount offsets the 25 km extension during the extensional phase and the 20 % shortening during the collisional phase, comparable to estimates for the SE Zagros (McQuarrie, 2004; Motamedi et al., 2012; Pirouz et al., 2017; Najafi et al., 2021).
3.5 Surface processes
The surface processes of sedimentation and erosion during the evolution of the models are simulated by applying diffusion of the rock–air interface. We used the following diffusion equation:
where hs is the surface topography, t is time, K denotes a diffusion constant (K = 10−6 m2 s−1), and x is the horizontal coordinate. The left and right sides of the surface line prescribe free-slip boundaries.
A total of 11 experiments is presented to investigate the role of basement involvement and the impact of salt rheology and thickness on the structural evolution of the Fars Arc. Experiments are divided into four series, varying in (1) the thickness of the salt layer, (2) the rheology of the salt layer, (3) the existence and geometry of pre-existing basement faults, and (4) the degree involvement of the basement during convergence (Table 2). While the numerical model is based on a viscous formulation and thus develops localized shear zones, we refer to them as faults if they form due to the implemented Drucker–Prager failure criterion (see Eq. 11). First, we present the temporal evolution of the reference model to which the rest of the models are compared. All experiments undergo extension for 5 Myr, followed by compression for 15 Myr. A link to videos (graphics interchange format, GIF) of all numerical experiments can be found in the “Data availability” section.
4.1 Evolution of the reference model
The reference model (Model 1) has an initial 2 km thick salt horizon with a power law viscous rheology (Tables 1 and 2). The basement exhibits three inherited listric fault zones and is shortened at the same rate as the sedimentary cover during convergence. The extensional phase is characterized by the development of half-graben basins forming along the listric basement faults that are filled by syn-extensional deposits (Figs. 4a–c and S1 in the Supplement). The second invariant of the strain-rate tensor shows that the fastest deformation occurs along the pre-existing weak zones. During extension, all three inherited faults are simultaneously active and without any recognizable preference. Normal fault deformation along the basement faults propagates upward into the post-salt strata, inducing typical half-grabens and the bending of the hanging wall (Fig. 4c and S1).
After compression for 5 Myr, the cover sequence mainly deforms between the right backstop and the salt pinch-out at x ≈ 150 km (Fig. 4d and S1). The basement fault closest to the backstop has experienced a significant amount of reverse motion and has caused a large step of several kilometers in the salt décollement geometry. Faulting of the sedimentary cover mainly develops where the syn-rift strata are the thinnest, i.e., in front of the basement thrusts. Strain localization occurs along the basement faults, and in the case of the frontal fault (x ≈ 120 km), it cuts across the strata overlying the salt layer (Fig. 4d and S1). Towards the backstop, the deformation in the basement and the cover sequence is decoupled along the weak salt horizon.
As convergence progresses (10 Myr), the basement fault at x ≈ 300 km undergoes inversion and creates a ramp–flat–ramp geometry (Fig. 4e and S1). Basement fault propagation deforms the syn-extensional strata and forms harpoon-like anticlines within the sedimentary cover. The syn-tectonic sedimentation concentrates within multiple structural basins between the developing anticlines. The salt layer decouples the deformation between the basement faulting and the sedimentary cover folding, allowing for more amplification within the sedimentary cover. Strain rates indicate intense deformation within the basement, which particularly localizes along the inverted normal faults, as well as the basal décollement level. The strain-rate pattern starts to gradually diffuse below ∼ 26 km depth, indicating the transition from brittle to ductile deformation in the lower crust (Fig. 4f and S1).
Patterns of the second invariant of the stress tensor after the extensional phase and after full convergence indicate an increase in stress with depth down to ∼ 30 km (y = 50 km), which is where the brittle-to-ductile transition begins (Fig. 5a and d). The lower part of the basement displays low stresses, given its lower viscosities and ductile nature (Fig. 5b and e). Viscosity plots furthermore indicate the position of the low-viscous décollement and basement thrusts.
Figure 5c illustrates the vertically averaged viscosity of the non-Newtonian salt horizon after an extension of 25 km, which is influenced by the temperature and strain rate (Table 1; Li and Urai, 2016). During the extension and the formation of half-grabens along pre-existing faults, the strain-rate and temperature increase in these areas. Consequently, these regions exhibit the lowest viscosities (1018 Pa s), corresponding to the locations of the basement faults (Fig. 5c). In areas without strain localization within the cover sequence, the viscosity shows larger values (1019–1020 Pa s). After an extension for 5 Myr, the half-graben basins are covered by post-rift deposits prior to the onset of convergence. After 15 Myr, the intensity of thin-skinned folding within the sedimentary cover increases (Fig. 5f). The development of long-wavelength folds is influenced by the reactivation of basement faults, which exert a significant impact on the deformation of the upper crustal region. The frontal basement fault is influenced by the salt pinch-out and overthrusts the post-rift strata, whereas the other two faults undergo a transition to a ramp–flat–ramp configuration. In the post-rift sediments, new shear zones are formed along the continuation of the pre-existing faults. These faults have been displaced due to the presence of basal salt, leading to deviation from their original dip. Strain rates indicate that the continuity of the salt décollement is disrupted due to the offset introduced by the inherited faults (Fig. 4f). The largest viscosities of salt are found in the anticlines with long wavelengths that form in the areas between two pre-existing faults (Fig. 5f). In contrast, lower viscosities are observed in areas where the strain rate reaches its maximum, specifically at the tip of the basement faults where the salt layer is thin.
4.2 Effect of salt thickness
Figure 6 shows the effect of the thickness of the salt layer on the deformation. In the absence of a salt layer (Model 2; Fig. 6a), no mechanical decoupling occurs between the sedimentary cover and the basement. The extension phase is dominated by the pre-existing faults and their geometry, and the majority of the deformation accumulates along the pre-existing normal faults. After convergence for 15 Myr, long-wavelength and basement-cored anticlines develop in the sedimentary cover. The anticlines form asymmetrically and with a low internal deformation of the sedimentary sequence (Figs. 6b and S2). The folding style within the sedimentary cover is determined by the pre-existing faults, resulting in the development of thrust faults that propagate upward through the overlying rocks. Basement faults cut the sedimentary cover and reach the surface without any significant deviation from their initial orientation. Furthermore, backthrusts form in the hanging wall as conjugates to the reactivated inherited faults. Strain-rate patterns reveal that the entire crustal package deforms uniformly, without mechanical decoupling along the different lithological layers.
Increasing the salt layer thickness to 4 km (Model 3) does not significantly affect the structural development during the extension phase compared to the reference model (Figs. 4c and 6c). However, a thicker salt layer hinders the extensional faults from fully cross-cutting the salt after a full extension (Figs. 6c and S3). During shortening, a thicker salt layer acts as a more efficient décollement, impeding small-scale deformation in the sedimentary cover relative to the reference model (Fig. 6d; compare to Fig. 4f). The sedimentary cover develops décollement folds cored by a thickened salt. The cover is pushed over the frontal basement fault on the left, which, upon reactivation, results in a salt-cored fault-propagation fold at x ≈ 210 km. Furthermore, the increased amount of salt allows for vertical breakthroughs and diapir formation.
4.3 Effect of salt rheology
To investigate the impact of the rheology of the salt on the style of deformation, we considered two models with linear viscosity for the salt layer and compared the results with that of the reference model. For Models 4 and 5, we chose linear viscosities of 1018 and 1020 Pa s, respectively, which are roughly equal to the lowest and largest viscosities observed in the reference model (Fig. 5c and f). After an extension for 5 Myr, the low-viscosity Model 4 leads to the formation of symmetric ridges along the half-grabens and footwalls (Figs. 7a and S4). The majority of the deformation is accommodated by the salt layer and the inherited faults. After compression for 15 Myr, the pattern of folds within the sedimentary cover diverges from that of the reference model, as it displays an inclination towards the hinterland (Figs. 7b and S4). Based on the strain rates, deformation is accommodated across the décollements.
In Model 5, with higher salt viscosity, the structural pattern after an extension for 5 Myr resembles that of the reference model (Figs. 4c and 7c). Strain rates reveal significant deformation occurring within the basement, localizing along the pre-existing weak zones. After shortening for 15 Myr, the style of folding shows significant differences from Model 4 (Figs. 7b, d and S5 in the Supplement). Several forethrusts develop above the imbricated basement blocks and backthrusts are generally absent. Strain rates indicate that the décollement remains laterally connected across the different basement blocks, whereas it is interrupted in the model with low linear viscosity (compare Fig. 7b and d).
Figure 8 presents the vertically averaged strain rate within the salt layer across models with different décollement rheology. The influence of a power law rheology on strain rate is characterized by a non-linear, accelerating response to stress. As stress levels increase, the strain rate increases more rapidly compared to a linear rheology, where the strain rate maintains a constant, linear relationship with stress. The mean strain rate in a salt layer with a power law rheology exceeds that in a salt layer with linear rheology, as illustrated.
4.4 Effect of basement fault geometry
Figure 9 shows two models, namely one with planar basement faults (Model 6) and one without prescribed basement faults (Model 7). After an extension for 5 Myr, the basement faults maintain a constant dip angle, resulting in the formation of conjugate normal faults rooting in the lower extent of the pre-existing faults (Figs. 9a and S6). Similar to the case with listric faults (Fig. 4c), the second invariant of the strain-rate tensor indicates high concentration of deformation through the development of fractures within the sedimentary layers above the salt horizon, specifically at the back of the footwall of the faults (Figs. 9a and S6). After compression for 15 Myr, multiple overturned forward- and backward-verging folds develop within the sedimentary cover at x ≈ 350 km (Figs. 9b and S6). These folds originate in relation to the activation of thrusts in the underlying basement. Notably, the planar faults play a pivotal role in the formation of backthrust faults. The principal strain rate is concentrated within vulnerable zones such as the salt layer, planar faults, and the newly formed backthrust faults within the basement (Figs. 9b and S6). Basement faults cross-cut the salt décollement to form bypass thrusts.
In the absence of inherited faults (Figs. 9c and S7), no zone of significant strain accumulation is formed during the extension phase. The maximum strain rate accumulates primarily along the fractures caused by the extension, while the basement is decoupled from the overlying sedimentary strata. After a shortening for 15 Myr, the basement has undergone an intense deformation by thrusting (Figs. 9d and S7). Near the backstop wall (x = 350–500 km), it is deformed into pop-up structures caused by conjugate thrusts, while forward-verging thrusts dominate towards the foreland. The overlaying sedimentary sequence is mainly shortened by décollement folding/faulting between x = 200–350 km. A large pop-up structure (x ≈ 230 km) without mechanical decoupling between the basement and the sedimentary cover develops in front of the salt pinch-out (Figs. 9d and S7). The strain rates indicate that at the late stage of shortening, a thin-skinned style of deformation is taking place in front of the salt pinch-out and the associated basement thrust.
4.5 Effect of basement shortening rate
The effect of basement involvement during convergence is implemented by varying the horizontal velocity of basement rocks exiting the right-side boundary, vx_b (Fig. 3b). All of the previous models exhibit a rigid backstop over the entire right side that prevented the basement material from leaving the model domain (vx_b = 0), resulting in 100 % involvement of the basement in the deformation. In this section, we show a set of models in which the basement is allowed to exit the model domain with a velocity that is a varying fraction of that on the left boundary (Fig. 10). The basement will experience a slower rate of shortening with respect to the cover. As a result, the degree of thin-skinned deformation will increase.
With a basement involvement of 75 % (vx_b = 0.25 ⋅ vx), the two faults located on the right side of the model transform into flat–ramp–flat structures (Model 8; Figs. 10a and S8). Above the basement blocks, the sedimentary cover undergoes thrusting, and the cover sequence overthrusts the frontal fault zone by ∼ 50 km. If the basement shortening rate is 50 % of the cover shortening rate (vx_b = 0.5 ⋅ vx), the faults situated on the right side of the model remain continuous and undergo significant displacement (Model 9; Figs. 10b and S9). After a convergence for 15 Myr, the fault on the right side partly exits the model domain. Additionally, strain rate indicates that most deformation localizes within the salt layer, the pre-existing basement faults, and faults within the sedimentary cover. With a basement involvement of 25 % (vx_b = 0.75 ⋅ vx), the fault on the right side almost entirely left the model domain, and the other two faults experience lesser degrees of involvement, roughly displaying 100 % of tectonic inversion (Model 10; Figs. 10c and S10). In comparison to the previous cases, deformation in the sedimentary cover is more distributed laterally and does not depend as strongly on the location of basement faults. Furthermore, the salt layer remains connected and forms a nearly horizontal décollement horizon (Fig. 10c). In the case where the basement exits the model domain with the same velocity as the bottom boundary (vx_b = vx), inherited basement faults are not reactivated, and the sedimentary cover deforms in a thin-skinned tectonic style (Model 11; Figs. 10d and S11). The second invariant of the strain-rate tensor demonstrates that the salt horizon acts as a décollement layer with basement steps that developed during the rifting phase. The resulting thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belt exhibits a flat surface taper, given the weak salt rheology (Fig. 10d).
The models presented in the previous sections demonstrate the impact of weak zones, in the form of décollement layers and pre-existing basement faults, and the degree of involvement of the basement on the structural evolution and reactivation of inherited structures during tectonic inversion. In the following, we will provide insight into the effects of the implemented variables on the dynamic strength of the basement and strain localization within it. Furthermore, numerical results are compared to previous modeling attempts and natural examples from the ZFTB.
5.1 Strength and localization of deformation within the basement
The mechanical strength of fold-and-thrust belts and the partitioning of strain during their growth has been a topic of interest for many decades (Chapple, 1978; Davis et al., 1983; Stockmal et al., 2007; Tavani et al., 2015). During continental collision and the emergence of mountain belts, plate convergence rates usually decrease stepwise, given the increasing strength of the affected plate boundary (Wortel et al., 2009). Weak zones within the deformed rock layers play a crucial role in shaping the structural evolution of fold-and-thrust belts. In the case of the Zagros, numerical experiments demonstrate that the sub-horizontal salt horizon and inherited weak basement faults significantly influence the partitioning of strain. Regardless of whether the viscous décollement can fully decouple the upper and lower crust mechanically, the basement exerts a strong influence on the overall structural evolution of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt. This must be considered when constructing structural cross sections.
All experiments with prescribed weak zones within the basement show intense inversion along these inherited structures (e.g., Fig. 4). A particular experiment is Model 7, where no basement faults were prescribed (Fig. 9c and d). The structural style observed in Model 7 is driven by the low rheological strength of the salt layer, which decouples basement shortening from the overlying layers, resulting in thin-skinned deformation of the cover sequence (Fig. 9d). This weak salt layer promotes the formation of fault-propagation folds and conjugate thrusts (pop-ups), rather than a clear structural vergence, as observed by a large pop-up structure at x ≈ 230 km. The topography of the top of basement is likely caused by a critical wedge geometry defined by the viscous strength of the lowermost modeled crust.
In fold-and-thrust belts with local weak zones in the form of décollement layers and reactivated inherited faults, strength may vary across-strike. For example, the reference model (Model 1) displays a stress distribution with maximum values in the brittle part of the basement, which is cross-cut by hinterland-dipping faults (Fig. 11a). To illustrate across-strike variations in strength, three vertical stress profiles are shown representing different segments of the evolving fold-and-thrust belt. (i) At x = 150 km, basement faults and a salt décollement are absent, and the strength profile exhibits a simple form with a brittle (y ≈ 15–40 km) and ductile (y ≈ 40–60 km) part (Fig. 11b). (ii) The second profile at x = 320 km cross-cuts both salt décollement (y ≈ 18 km) and a basement fault (y ≈ 40 km) that strongly affect the strength profile (Fig. 11c). While the salt horizon shows very low stresses of only a few megapascals, stresses across the basement fault are reduced to ∼ 150 MPa, in contrast to maximum stresses of ∼ 600 MPa around the brittle–ductile transition. (iii) Close to the backstop at x = 460 km, maximal stresses increase to ∼ 800 MPa at y ≈ 40 km (Fig. 11d). At y ≈ 18 km, the salt décollement displays an effective decoupling horizon, and an additional weak zone at y ≈ 27 km is defined by flat ramp of a basement sliver stack. To infer the force acting across the fold-and-thrust belt related to the reference model, the differential stress profiles at each x coordinate are integrated over the vertical distance. For the reference model after a convergence for 15 Myr, values range between ∼ 7–15 TN m−1, where the lowest values coincide with the occurrence of basement faults (Fig. 11c). In general, there is no clear trend observable that would refer to a weakening or strengthening related to deformation, as crustal thickening (strengthening) goes hand in hand with basement thrusting (weakening).
Figure 12 shows the temporal evolution of the average force (e.g., the average value of Fig. 11e for the reference model) for a variety of models to identify key parameters that affect the stress state of continental collision zones. All models show similar boundary forces during the extension phase of ∼ 4 TN m−1 (Fig. 12), except for Model 7 without pre-existing basement faults, which exhibits values of ∼ 4.2 TN m−1 (Fig. 12b). Similar force values during the extension for models with planar and listric inherited basement faults indicate that none of the tested fault geometries would preferably localize. During the convergence phase, boundary forces quickly increase, and most of the models show a general increasing trend from ∼ 6–8 TN m−1 to ∼ 10–12 TN m−1 over a 15 Myr time span (Fig. 12). A minor increase and decrease in force are observed related to the absence (Model 2) and increased thickness of the salt horizon (Model 3), respectively, while the strength (viscosity) of the salt has no detectable effect (Fig. 12a). The absence and geometry of basement faults display a significant importance during convergence, in contrast to the extension phase, where planar preexisting faults increase the necessary boundary force by ∼ 1–2 TN m−1, and no faults lead to another increase of ∼ 1–2 TN m−1 during the first 10 Myr of convergence (Fig. 12b). More important is the effect of basement involvement in crustal shortening, with decreasing involvement resulting in decreasing boundary force (Fig. 12c). This illustrates the importance of an effective décollement level that is able to decouple an upper crust with distributed deformation from a basement that is underthrust towards the suture, where it deforms more intensely (Tavani et al., 2015; Pfiffner et al., 2002). A similar pattern of boundary force evolution was also observed from analogue models, however, with more acute variations for specific internal deformation of the compressed sand pile (McBeck et al., 2018).
5.2 Comparison with numerical modeling studies
The mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts has been investigated by means of numerical methods since the 1980s (e.g., Borja and Dreiss, 1989). Rapidly evolving computing capabilities led to a vast increase in geodynamic numerical modeling studies that provide an invaluable contribution towards our understanding of geotectonic systems (e.g., van Zelst et al., 2022; Gerya, 2022; Ismail-Zadeh and Tackley, 2010). Previous numerical models of fold-and-thrust belts have typically focused on thin-skinned tectonic systems, investigating parameters such as wedge and décollement strength, rheology, surface processes, and mechanical stratigraphy (e.g., Stockmal et al., 2007; Buiter et al., 2016; Simpson, 2011; Burbidge and Braun, 2002; Ruh et al., 2012). However, the inclusion of rifting prior to collision adds a new dimension that has often been overlooked in these studies. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of tectonic evolution by examining how pre-collisional structural configurations influence later deformation patterns. Including rifting before convergence is crucial, as it sets the initial conditions that significantly impact structural evolution during collision (Buiter and Pfiffner, 2003; Ruh and Vergés, 2018; Granado and Ruh, 2019). This approach offers several advantages. It provides insight into structural inheritance, as rifting creates pre-existing weaknesses and fault systems that play a crucial role during subsequent compressional phases. Our model demonstrates how these inherited structures influence strain localization and deformation styles, providing insights into the evolution of complex geological features such as the Fars Arc. In the following, we discuss several numerical studies concerning tectonic systems that are similar to the one presented in this study to set our results into perspective and to identify generally applicable observations. We, furthermore, comment on the importance of implementing an extensional phase into the model setup.
Buiter and Pfiffner (2003) applied a two-dimensional, viscoplastic numerical model in order to evaluate the dynamics of tectonic inversion of a series of half-graben basins upon compression. They reported syn- and post-rift sediment uplift, accompanied by basement block rotation, and the emergence of newly formed shear zones in the post-rift sequence, originating from basin-bounding faults. Weak sediments at the basin base contribute to the generation of basement shortcut faults. Furthermore, their study illustrates the predominant development of back thrusts as conjugates to listric basin-bounding faults. The structural evolution observed in our models aligns with their research findings, demonstrating a similar pattern of strain localization within syn-rift and post-rift layers, mainly initiated by deformation along pre-existing underlying faults. Additionally, compared to their findings, our results indicate that the formation of back thrusts is mainly associated with the inversion of planar faults (Fig. 9; Model 6).
Nilforoushan et al. (2013) presented two-dimensional thermomechanical experiments of thick-skinned fold-and-thrust belts with salt décollements. They demonstrated that the geothermal gradient and the mineralogy of the basement (ductile flow law) strongly affect the geometry and reactivation of inherited basement faults. Furthermore, they underlined the importance of a weak salt horizon at the base of the sedimentary succession for the mechanical decoupling and formation of a thin-skinned upper-crustal fold-and-thrust belt, resulting in the variability in the rate of shortening between the cover and the basement. Their findings corroborate the hypothesis of Molinaro et al. (2005) that in the ZSFB, greater shortening occurs within the cover compared to the basement. From our results examining the effects of the shortening rate of the basement on structural development, we observed the emergence of long-wavelength folds arising directly from the movements of faults within the basement (Fig. 11a–d). These findings align with natural occurrences and are corroborated by geological cross-sectional data, reinforcing the principal characteristics of the Fars Arc that are typified by folds of extensive wavelengths. This agrees with the suggestions by Mouthereau et al. (2006), who proposed that the early activation of basement deformation dictates the formation of the large-wavelength folds. Furthermore, Mouthereau et al. (2006) determined that the viscosity of Hormuz salt decreases significantly with increasing temperature, exhibiting Newtonian fluid behavior under low-stress and low-strain-rate conditions. In our results, the average viscosity of non-Newtonian salt is affected by both temperature and strain rate, where weak zones with the lowest strain rates and temperatures exhibit the largest viscosity values. The resulting values are larger than what was proposed for the Fars Arc resulting from critical wedge modeling (Mouthereau et al., 2006).
Ghazian and Buiter (2014) investigated the impact of salt for the southeast ZFTB by 2D thermomechanical models. Their findings revealed that the presence of a thick basal Hormuz salt effectively decouples overlying sediments from the basement and promotes the localization of deformation in the sediments. Our results align with these findings, demonstrating a significant influence of the salt layer on controlling topographic height and folding patterns (Figs. 4 and 6). The deformation style in the basement and the cover sequence decouples along the weak salt horizon. As the salt thickness increases, this layer functions more effectively as a décollement, impeding deformation in the sedimentary cover sequence (Fig. 6).
Bauville and Schmalholz (2015, 2017) and Kiss et al. (2020) conducted 2D numerical experiments to investigate the transition from basement-involved thin-skinned to thick-skinned tectonics and the effects of tectonic inheritance on the development of nappe systems. The key parameters controlling this transition were found to be the viscosity ratios within the basement and between the basement and the sedimentary cover above it. Specifically, a higher ratio within the basement favors a thick-skinned deformation, while a higher ratio between the basement and cover leads to a thin-skinned deformation. As indicated by our study, 100 % participation of the basement in the deformation leads to thick-skinned deformation (Fig. 4), while non-participation of the basement leads to thin-skinned deformation (Fig. 10; Model 11). Their findings show that the tectonic and structural inheritance play a significant role in controlling the tectonic evolution and resulting structures in the fold-and-thrust belts. The geometry and magnitude of mechanical heterogeneities, like the varying basement–cover interface characterized by half-grabens and horsts, as well as the vertical alternation of sedimentary layers with different mechanical strengths, influence nappe formation. Their observations align with our findings that the presence of pre-rift salt and inherited faults, which serve as structural inheritances, influence the shape and geometry of the basin (Figs. 4, 6, and 7). Moreover, their simulations and ours revealed that linear and power law viscous rheologies demonstrated similar features to those of more complex simulations, indicating the robustness of these findings (Fig. 7; Model 4 and 5).
Eslamrezaei et al. (2023) used numerical discrete element models to investigate the impact of mechanical stratigraphy, décollement layers, and the number and thickness of cover sequences on the structural evolution and strain partitioning of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts. Their modeling outcomes revealed that weak décollements played a crucial role in decoupled deformation within the fold-and-thrust belt under continuous shortening. The study underscored that shortening was primarily accommodated by thrust-related folds, resulting in notable variations in structural styles. In alignment with our findings (Figs. 4, 6 and 10), the weak décollement layer, due to its characteristics, exhibited an inability to retain stress and undergo deformation, as evidenced by the increasing strain rate along the basal detachment (Fig. 4). Their study's conclusions and our results emphasized that the structural style and decoupling in thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts and the formation of structures, such as box folds and harpoon structures, are influenced by factors such as rheology, the number, and thickness of décollements (Figs. 6 and 7).
An essential characteristic of the numerical experiments presented here is the implementation of a rifting phase prevailing crustal shortening. Earlier numerical studies on tectonic inversion demonstrated that strain-related weakening of the crustal basement during an extensional tectonic phase has an important effect on the localization of deformation during consequent convergence (Ruh and Vergés, 2018). Furthermore, the mechanical strength of sedimentary deposits filling rift-related basins has been shown to influence the structural evolution during tectonic inversion, where weak syn-rift deposits favor the development of hanging wall bypass structures (Granado and Ruh, 2019). In contrast, various studies mimic the extensional phase by prescribing inherited structures and geometric configurations comparable to rifted margins instead of conducting an extensional phase when investigating the tectonic inversion of fold-and-thrust belts (e.g., Buiter and Pfiffner, 2003; Nilforoushan et al., 2013; Bauville and Schmalholz, 2015; Kiss et al., 2020). However, the implementation of an extension phase allows for a dynamic formation of basement steps and graben geometry, based on the thermomechanical model characteristics such as the visco–plastic/brittle transition and the evolution of the salt decoupling along the basement top (Fig. 4a–c and 5a, b). Model 7 demonstrates that a certain type of strain localization is needed to form narrow shear bands similar to basement faults during extension (Fig. 9c). While other studies impose specific boundary conditions (Ruh and Vergés, 2018) or thermal variations (Ruh and Vergés, 2018), we introduced predefined geometries to localize extensional normal faults, controlling the position of basement deformation (Fig. 3b).
5.3 Comparison with the structural evolution of the Fars Arc
The tectonic style of the Fars Arc is characterized by a combination of thin-skinned salt-related folding and thick-skinned basement thrusting (i.e., Mouthereau et al., 2007a). The structure of the sedimentary cover is shaped by a series of detachment faults and fault-propagation folds involving several salt diapirs rooted in the Hormuz salt (e.g., Jahani et al., 2007; Motamedi and Gharabeigli, 2019; Vergés et al., 2024). In addition, at least three high-angle reverse basement faults (High Zagros, Surmeh, and Mountain Front faults) are constrained based on their seismicity, structural relief, magnetic anomalies, and abrupt topographic changes (e.g., Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Teknik and Ghods, 2017; Karasözen et al., 2019). The dynamic importance of these faults is supported by our results, as numerical models without basement faults (Model 7 in Fig. 9) display a marked difference in the structural style compared to geological observations in the Fars Arc. In the absence of basement faults in the models, deformation is concentrated only in the outer part of the arc in the form of an imbricate thrust system and a large mushroom anticline near the salt pinch-out. Furthermore, the importance of the Hormuz salt for the distinct structural style of the Fars Arc is corroborated by the numerical model without a basal salt layer (Model 2 in Fig. 6a and b). In that model, there are four basement-involved anticlines form across the entire belt, each with wavelengths of about 100 km, while in contrast, in the Fars Arc, the anticlines can be grouped into short-wavelength detachment anticlines and long-wavelength basement-involved anticlines (e.g., Mouthereau et al., 2006). In the model without salt, all structures verge towards the front without any back-thrusting. This type of fold and fault geometry is not representative of the observed structures in the Fars Arc (e.g., Motamedi et al., 2012; Najafi et al., 2014; Jahani et al., 2017). Observational evidence thus highlights the essential roles that the basement and the salt layer play in determining the deformation style of the belt.
The results of the experiment with a 4 km thick basal salt layer (Model 3; Fig. 6c and d) demonstrate that a thicker salt layer interacts with the basement faults to form symmetrical anticlines containing salt cores and discordant diapirs. The topography of the Fars Arc cannot be solely attributed to the presence of a salt layer; the basement's role in structural development is also significant. As our results indicate, processes involving the basement should be considered an essential factor in reconstructing and assessing the geological development of the region. The models demonstrate that the basement faults ramp up through the upper part of the basement and eventually flatten along the Hormuz salt level at a depth of around 10 km (Model 1 in Fig. 4f). Similar structures of basement faults detaching along evaporitic levels in the middle of the sedimentary cover, or reaching the surface to cut the forelimbs of their hanging wall anticlines, are documented in the Fars Arc (Vergeìs et al., 2024), such as the Kangan, Asaluyeh, and Tabnak anticlines, located to the south of the cross section in the foreland vicinity and within the Mountain Front Fault (Berberian, 1995; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Fig. 13b and c). These anticlines are characterized by a pronounced concentric surface geometry (Fig. 13a).
A well-studied example of syn-tectonic growth strata is the Dowlatabad syncline, located approximately 40 km northeast of the Persian Gulf coastline (Fig. 13a and b) and limited by the Sefid anticline to the north and the NW segment of the Pazan anticline to the south (Najafi et al., 2021). The Dowlatabad syncline is infilled by more than 2 km of syn-folding sediments. Numerical results from Model 3, which has a thick salt layer, compare well with the formation of the Dowlatabad syncline (Fig. 13a and b). (i) The forelimbs of the Pazan and Sefid anticlines were faulted by foreland-directed thrusts rising from the basal décollement; (ii) surface processes resulted in a smooth topography; and (iii) the surface has an asymmetric shape, while, at depth, the structure has the form of a box fold.
In the Zagros belt, there is a noted relationship between faulting patterns and the distribution of salt diapirs (Talbot and Alavi, 1996; Hessami et al., 2001; Bahroudi and Koyi, 2003; Sherkati and Letouzey, 2004; Sepehr and Cosgrove, 2004; Jahani et al., 2017). Our numerical results indicate that salt diapirism may be triggered at two distinct stages in the case of a thick (4 km) salt décollement. During the rifting phase, small-scale diapirs start to grow above the tip of normal faults, partially piercing the sedimentary cover (Model 3; Fig. 6c). This procedure can be considered a short-lasting and locally developed reactive diapirism stage (e.g., Jackson and Vendeville, 1994; Jackson and Hudec, 2017). More significantly, the growth of two salt diapirs is observed during the compression phase in the inner zone of the fold-and-thrust belt (Model 3 in Fig. 6d). In contrast to décollement folds, these salt bodies have pierced the overburden strata and show discordant contact with overlying sediments. The process involves the buoyant rise in underground salt when subjected to pressure from convergent tectonic forces. These early-growing diapirs, squeezed by further shortening, lead to the development of secondary salt welds. This type of shortened diapir has recently been documented in the High Zagros zone in a field-based study by Taghikhani et al. (2024) and has been already known in the SE Fars Arc (e.g., Callot et al., 2007; Jahani et al., 2007) and the Persian Gulf (e.g., Hassanpour et al., 2021, 2021; Snidero et al., 2020) through seismic interpretations. A well-exposed example of such a structure is the Hajiabad diapir, located in the inner part of the Fars Arc, where an 8 km long squeezed Hormuz salt diapir trends NW and dips towards NE (Fig. 13d). The salt-bearing evaporites have been shortened between the two flanks of the precursor salt wall, forming a secondary salt weld. Another well-exposed example in the inner Fars is the Kharman diapir (Fig. 13e), which is in good correlation with observations from Model 3. With numerical modeling, Fernandez and Kaus (2014) showed that pre-existing salt diapirs can significantly influence the pattern and growth of three-dimensional folds and fold patterns, accelerating fold formation and localizing deformation and highlighting the important role of diapirism in structural evolution during tectonic processes.
5.4 Implication for seismic activity in the Fars Arc
Figure 14a displays a seismicity map of the Zagros in the region of our profile. It shows events with magnitudes greater than ML = 4, between 2000 and 2023 from the International Seismological Centre (ISC) global database (http://www.ics.ac.uk, last access: 1 January 2023). We have excluded those events of the database with pre-fixed depths (usually set at 10 or 15 km) from the plot. Furthermore, a catalogue of small-magnitude earthquakes from Tatar et al. (2004) recorded by a local temporary network over a period of 7 weeks is plotted. A local network with close station spacing allows for more precise location of earthquakes, and Tatar et al. (2004) state that these events have horizontal and vertical uncertainties below 2 km. The earthquakes are also plotted onto the geological cross section of Fig. 1c and the compositional image of the final stage (15 Myr) of Model 1 (Fig. 14b and c). Several studies have asserted that the depths and focal mechanism solutions indicate that high-angle reverse faults in the basement are responsible for major earthquakes in the SE Zagros (e.g., Jackson and Fitch, 1981; Berberian, 1995; Talebian and Jackson, 2004). Others have argued that most of the strongest earthquakes in the ZSFB probably lie in the lower sedimentary cover, but their aftershock activity mostly occurs deeper in the basement (e.g., Nissen et al., 2011, 2014). A more recent work by Karasözen et al. (2019) used a calibrated earthquake relocation to show that the Zagros earthquakes nucleate in both the cover and the basement. According to our numerical results, the activation of basement structures localizes topographic features and affects thrust faults within the overlying sedimentary cover (Figs. 4f, 9b, and 10). Notable examples of active basement faults in the Fars Arc include the Surmeh Fault and the Mountain Front Fault, which have distinct structural and topographic characteristics (Jackson,1980; Jackson and McKenzie, 1984; Berberian, 1995; Mouthereau et al., 2007b). Critical wedge modeling confirms that basement-involved shortening is the primary factor influencing deformation and topography in the Fars Arc (Figs. 4f and 9b; Mouthereau et al., 2006). Balanced cross sections provide additional evidence of the basement's involvement in shortening through major thrusts rooted in a deep décollement level within the lower crust (Molinaro et al., 2005; Mouthereau et al., 2007b; Najafi et al.; 2014; Najafi et al.; 2021).
The majority of earthquakes are concentrated within the sedimentary cover, aligning with the décollement faults (Fig. 14b and c). This observation supports the theory of the sedimentary cover decoupling from the basement, influenced by the presence of the basal salt layer. The depth trend of earthquakes in the basement exhibits a notable correlation with the High Zagros Fault and the Surmeh Fault, which confirms the existence of pre-existing weak zones within the basement at these locations. Furthermore, the depth distribution of the earthquakes supports the idea of a listric geometry for the basement faults. By examining the deformation within the basement and the earthquake depths, we estimate the transition zone from brittle to ductile behavior at around 30 km. While this depth is influenced by multiple factors, including material parameters, temperature, and strain rate (stress), our approximation is based on typical conditions relevant to the region. This suggests that diabase rheology, combined with the applied geotherm, is appropriate for modeling the basement under these specific conditions. Mouthereau et al. (2006), on the other hand, concluded that diabase might be too weak to reproduce the observed topography in the Fars Arc. However, they apply a crustal thickness of 45 km, which implies increased temperature conditions and thus a weaker diabase detachment.
Our modeling results indicate that reverse faults cutting both flanks of décollement anticlines are likely responsible for the shallower earthquakes (Fig. 14c). This phenomenon was studied in the Shanul anticline, southeast of our study region, where earthquakes with reverse mechanisms occur on both flanks of the anticline at depths mostly ≤ 4 km (Jamalreyhani et al., 2021). However, basement faults are the source of deeper and larger earthquakes across the Zagros fold belt, generally concentrated in NE-dipping linear trends (e.g., Nissen et al., 2019; Fig. 14).
Lacombe and Mouthereau (2002) discussed the relative chronology between mid-crustal décollement thrusting and shallow décollement folding of sedimentary cover in various orogenic belts, such as Taiwan, the Pyrenees, and the Alps. This relationship has been further investigated through analogue and numerical modeling in the Jura, Appalachians, Kopet Dagh, and Zagros fold-and-thrust belts (e.g., Pohn, 2000; Orjuela et al., 2021; Ruh and Vergés, 2018; as presented in this study). A comprehensive analysis of these studies, in alignment with our results, suggests that there is no definitive sequence for thin- and thick-skinned tectonics in all orogenic belts. This sequence appears to be controlled, at least in part, by the rheology and temperature of basement rocks, the thickness of evaporitic layers in the sedimentary cover, the dip and flatness of inherited basement faults, as well as their orientation in relation to the tectonic transport direction.
Our series of 2D finite-difference thermomechanical numerical experiments provide insight into how the rheology of basal salt and the mechanical properties of inherited basement faults control the structural evolution and final style of fold-and-thrust belts. The models were designed based on the tectonic history (continental rifting and later collision) and mechanical stratigraphy of the Fars Arc in the Zagros orogenic belt. The comparison of numerical results with the actual structure of the Fars Arc has led to the following conclusions.
-
Pre-existing weak zones, such as basement faults and décollement anticlines, serve as primary sites for deformation accumulation, particularly during extensional tectonic phases.
-
The basement faults form large-wavelength and foreland-verging fault-propagation anticlines in the overlying sedimentary cover, while the thick salt layer promotes the growth of second-order and smaller-wavelength décollement anticlines accompanied by both fore- and back-limb thrust faults.
-
Reactivated faults play a crucial role in stress transfer, leading to the formation of new faults and seismic activity at their tips that propagate into the sedimentary cover. Listric faults are more effective at accommodating strain rates.
-
The presence of a basal salt layer influences fault displacement, contributing to the development of back thrusts within the sedimentary cover.
-
The distribution of earthquakes is significantly influenced by the presence of weak zones, with shallow earthquakes predominantly occurring along décollement levels and larger and deeper earthquakes associated with basement faults. These findings highlight the importance of considering geological and structural complexities when assessing seismicity and tectonic events in tectonically active regions like the Fars Arc.
-
The degree of basement involvement directly influences the model's resistance, with greater involvement facilitating deformation process over geologic time. In addition, variations in the resistance to the deformation based on salt rheology and fault geometry were observed, with listric faults minimizing resistance and therefore facilitating deformation.
-
Intense basement deformation observed in the numerical experiments indicates the importance of the lower crust for the construction of regional cross sections of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt.
The GIF videos of all experiments presented in this study are available in Figshare with the following identifier: https://figshare.com/s/cb0c7f5a9a6fda0e38ef (Gomar et al., 2024).
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1479-2024-supplement.
FG: modeling setup, experiment run, investigation, writing (original draft and handling), visualization, figure drafting. JR: hypothesis of work, numerical modeling code write-up, interpretation of results, validation, supervision, writing, and reviewing and editing. MN: hypothesis of work, interpretation of results, supervision, fieldwork and cross section construction, and reviewing and editing. FS: hypothesis of work, modeling setup, supervision, and reviewing and editing. All authors contributed to and approved the submitted article.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers, Frédéric Mouthereau and Lorenzo Giuseppe Candioti, for their time and effort in reviewing our paper. Their insightful comments and suggestions have significantly improved the quality of the paper. Additionally, we extend our appreciation to Susanne Buiter for her comments and editorial guidance throughout the review process. This work is based on the doctoral dissertation of the corresponding author, Fatemeh Gomar, at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan, Iran. It was partly developed during her 6-month scientific stay in the Structural Geology and Tectonics group at ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).
This paper was edited by Susanne Buiter and reviewed by Frédéric Mouthereau and Lorenzo Giuseppe Candioti.
Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., and Mouthereau, F.: Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): Constraints from collisional and earlier deformation, Int. J. Earth Sci., 94, 401–419, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-005-0481-4, 2005.
Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., Whitechurch, H., Vrielynck, B., Spakman, W., Monié, P., Meyer, B., and Wortel, R.: Zagros orogeny: A subduction-dominated process, Geol. Mag., 148, 692–725, https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100046X, 2011.
Alavi, M.: Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution, Am. J. Sci., 304, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.304.1.1, 2004.
Aldega, L., Bigi, S., Carminati, E., Trippetta, F., Corrado, S., and Kavoosi, M. A.: The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt in the Fars province (Iran): II. Thermal evolution, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 93, 376–390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.022, 2018.
Bahroudi, A. and Koyi, H. A.: Effect of spatial distribution of Hormuz salt on deformation style in the Zagros fold and thrust belt: An analogue modelling approach, J. Geol. Soc., 160, 719–733, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-135, 2003.
Barber, D. E., Stockli, D. F., and Galster, F.: The Proto-Zagros foreland basin in Lorestan, western Iran: Insights from multimineral detrital geothermochronometric and trace elemental provenance analysis, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 2657–2680, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008185, 2019.
Barchi, M. R. and Tavarnelli, E.: Thin vs. thick-skinned tectonics in the Umbria-Marche fold-and-thrust belt: Contrast or coexistence?, in: From the Guajira Desert to the Apennines, and from Mediterranean Microplates to the Mexican Killer Asteroid: Honoring the Career of Walter Alvarez, edited by: Koeberl, C., Claeys, P., and Montanari, A., Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA, 557, https://doi.org/10.1130/2022.2557(05), 2022.
Bauville, A. and Schmalholz, S. M.: Transition from thin-to thick-skinned tectonics and consequences for nappe formation: Numerical simulations and applications to the Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland, Tectonophysics, 665, 101–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.030, 2015.
Bauville, A. and Schmalholz, S. M.: Tectonic inheritance and kinematic strain localization as trigger for the formation of the Helvetic nappes, Switzerland, Swiss J. Geosci., 110, 523–534, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-017-0260-9, 2017.
Berberian, M.: Master “blind” thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics, Tectonophysics, 241, 193–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-C, 1995.
Berberian, M. and King, G. C. P.: Towards a Paleogeography and Tectonic Evolution of Iran, Can. J. Earth Sci., 18, 210–265, https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019, 1981.
Bernaola, G., Sharp, I. R., Blanc, E., Saura, E., Hunt, D. W., Fernandez, N., Embry, J. C., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Casini, G., Casciello, E., Romaire, I., and Homke, S.: Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, J. Geol. Soc., 168, 235–250, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092, 2011.
Blanc, E. J. P., Allen, M. B., Inger, S., and Hassani, H.: Structural styles in the Zagros Simple Folded Zone, Iran, J. Geol. Soc., 160, 401–412, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764902-110,2003.
Bonini, M., Sani, F., and Antonielli, B.: Basin inversion and contractional reactivation of inherited normal faults: A review based on previous and new experimental models, Tectonophysics, 522–523, 55–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.014, 2012.
Borderie, S., Graveleau, F., Witt, C., and Vendeville, B. C.: Impact of an interbedded viscous décollement on the structural and kinematic coupling in fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from analogue modeling, Tectonophysics, 722, 118–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.019, 2018.
Borja, R. I. and Dreiss, S. J.: Numerical modeling of accretionary wedge mechanics: Application to the Barbados subduction problem, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9323–9339, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB094iB07p09323, 1989.
Boyer, S. E. and Elliott, D.: Thrust systems, AAPG Bull.l, 66, 1196–1230, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417, 1982.
Buiter, S. J. H. and Pfiffner, O. A.: Numerical models of the inversion of half-graben basins, Tectonics, 22, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002tc001417,2003.
Buiter, S. J., Schreurs, G., Albertz, M., Gerya, T. V., Kaus, B., Landry, W., Le Pourhiet, L., Mishin, Y., Egholm, D. L., Cooke, M., and Maillot, B.: Benchmarking numerical models of brittle thrust wedges, J. Struct. Geol., 92, 140–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.003, 2016.
Burbidge, D. R. and Braun, J.: Numerical models of the evolution of accretionary wedges and fold-and-thrust belts using the distinct-element method, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 542–561, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x, 2002.
Callot, J. P., Jahani, S., and Letouzey, J.: The Role of Pre-Existing Diapirs in Fold and Thrust Belt Development. Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: from fold kinematics to hydrocarbon systems, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., and Vergés, J., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 309–325, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_16, 2007.
Callot, J. P., Trocmé, V., Letouzey, J., Albouy, E., Jahani, S., and Sherkati, S.: Pre-existing salt structures and the folding of the Zagros Mountains, Geol. Soc. Sp., 363, 545–561, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP363.27, 2012.
Crameri, F., Schmeling, H., Golabek, G. J., Duretz, T., Orendt, R., Buiter, S. J. H., May, D. A., Kaus, B. J. P., Gerya, T. V., and Tackley, P. J.: A comparison of numerical surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: an evaluation of the `sticky air'method, Geophys. J. Int., 189, 38–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x, 2012.
Chapple, W. M.: Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 89, 1189–1198, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89<1189:MOTFB>2.0.CO;2, 1978.
Cooper, M.: Structural style and hydrocarbon prospectivity in fold and thrust belts: A global review, Geol. Soc. Sp., 272, 447–472, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.272.01.23, 2007.
Dal Zilio, L., Ruh, J., and Avouac, J. P.: Structural evolution of orogenic wedges: interplay between erosion and weak décollements, Tectonics, 39, e2020TC006210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006210, 2020.
Davis, D., Suppe, J., and Dahlen, F. A.: Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 1153–1172, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153, 1983.
Davis, D., Suppe, J., and Dahlen, F. A.: Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 88, 1153–1172, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB02p01153, 1983.
Eslamirezaei, N., Alavi, S. A., Nabavi, S. T., and Ghassemi, M. R.: Influence of multiple décollement and cover rock rheology on the structural evolution of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: insights from discrete element modelling, C. R. Geosci., 355, 215–236, https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.224, 2023.
Etemad-Saeed, N., Najafi, M., and Vergés, J.: Provenance evolution of Oligocene–Pliocene foreland deposits in the Dezful embayment to constrain Central Zagros exhumation history, J. Geol. Soc., 177, 799–817, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2019-206, 2020.
Falcon, N. L.: Southern Iran: Zagros Mountains, Geol. Soc. Sp., 4, 199–211, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.004.01.11, 1974.
Gerya, T.: Introduction to numerical geodynamic modelling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 358 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316534243, 2019.
Gerya, T.: Numerical modeling of subduction: State of the art and future directions, Geosphere, 18, 503–561, https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02416.1, 2022.
Gerya, T. V., Yuen, D. A.: Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco–elasto–plastic thermo–mechanical problems, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 163, 83–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015, 2007.
Fernandez, N. and Kaus, B. J.: Influence of pre-existing salt diapirs on 3D folding patterns, Tectonophysics, 637, 354–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.021, 2014.
Ghazian, R. K. and Buiter, S. J. H.: Numerical modelling of the role of salt in continental collision: An application to the southeast Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Tectonophysics, 632, 96–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.006, 2014.
Gomar, F., Ruh, J. B., Najafi, M., and Sobouti, F.: GIF videos of numerical modeling experiments, Figshare, https://figshare.com/s/cb0c7f5a9a6fda0e38ef, last access: 3 Dezember 2024.
Goes, S., Hasterok, D., Schutt, D. L., and Klöcking, M.: Continental lithospheric temperatures: A review, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 306, 106509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106509, 2020.
Granado, P. and Ruh, J. B.: Numerical modelling of inversion tectonics in fold-and-thrust belts, Tectonophysics, 763, 14–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.033, 2019.
Hasterok, D. and Chapman, D. S.: Heat production and geotherms for the continental lithosphere, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 59–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.034, 2011.
Hassanpour, J., Yassaghi, A., Muñoz, J. A., and Jahani, S.: Salt tectonics in a double salt-source layer setting (Eastern Persian Gulf, Iran): Insights from interpretation of seismic profiles and sequential cross-section restoration, Basin Res., 33, 159–185, https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12459, 2021.
Hessami, K., Koyi, H. A., Talbot, C. J., Tabasi, H., and Shabanian, E.: Progressive unconformities within an evolving foreland fold-thrust belt, Zagros Mountains, J. Geol. Soc., 158, 969–982, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-007, 2001.
Heydarzadeh, K., Ruh, J. B., Vergés, J., Hajialibeigi, H., and Gharabeigli, G.: Evolution of a structural basin: numerical modelling applied to the Dehdasht Basin, Central Zagros, Iran, J. Asian Earth Sci., 187, 104088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104088, 2020.
Homke, S., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Sharp, I., Garcés, M., Montero-Verdú, I., Karpuz, R., and Goodarzi, M. H.: Late Cretaceous–Paleocene formation of the proto–Zagros foreland basin, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 121, 963–978, https://doi.org/10.1130/B26035.1, 2009.
Humair, F., Bauville, A., Epard, J. L., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Interaction of folding and thrusting during fold-and-thrust-belt evolution: Insights from numerical simulations and application to the Swiss Jura and the Canadian Foothills., Tectonophysics, 789, 228474, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228474, 2020.
Ismail-Zadeh, A. and Tackley, P.: Computational methods for geodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 301 pp, ISBN 9781139489355, 2010.
Jackson, J. and Fitch, T.: Basement faulting and the focal depths of the larger earthquakes in the Zagros mountains (Iran), Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 64, 561–586, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02685.x, 1981.
Jackson, J. and McKenzie, D.: Active tectonics of the Alpine–Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan, Geophys. J. Int., 77, 185–264, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb01931.x, 1984.
Jackson, J. A.: Reactivation of basement faults and crustal shortening in orogenic belts, Nature, 283, 343–346, https://doi.org/10.1038/283343a0, 1980.
Jackson, M. P. A. and Hudec, M. R.: Salt Tectonics: Principles and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 498 pp., ISBN 1107013313, 9781107013315, 2017.
Jackson, M. P. A. and Vendeville, B. C.: Regional extension as a geologic trigger for diapirism, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 106, 57–73, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106<0057:REAAGT>2.3.CO;2, 1994.
Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., Letouzey, J., and De Lamotte, D. F.: The eastern termination of the Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt, Iran: Structures, evolution, and relationships between salt plugs, folding, and faulting, Tectonics, 28, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002418, 2009.
Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., de Lamotte, D. F., Letouzey, J., and Leturmy, P.: The Salt Diapirs of the Eastern Fars Province (Zagros, Iran): A Brief Outline of Their Past and Present, in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., and Vergés, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 289–308, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_15, 2007.
Jahani, S., Hassanpour, J., Mohammadi-Firouz, S., Letouzey, J., de Lamotte, D. F., Alavi, S. A., and Soleimany, B.: Salt tectonics and tear faulting in the central part of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran, Mar. Pet. Geol., 86, 426–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.06.003, 2017.
Jamalreyhani, M., Pousse-Beltran, L., Büyükakpınar, P., Cesca, S., Nissen, E., Ghods, A., López-Comino, J.Á., Rezapour, M., and Najafi, M.: The 2019–2020 Khalili (Iran) Earthquake Sequence—Anthropogenic Seismicity in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, 2021JB022797, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022797, 2021.
Jiménez-Munt, I., Fernández, M., Saura, E., Vergés, J., and García-Castellanos, D.: 3-D lithospheric structure and regional/residual Bouguer anomalies in the Arabia–Eurasia collision (Iran), Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1311–1324, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05580.x, 2012.
Karasözen, E., Nissen, E., Bergman, E. A., and Ghods, A.: Seismotectonics of the Zagros (Iran) From Orogen-Wide, Calibrated Earthquake Relocations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 9109–9129, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017336, 2019.
Kendall, J., Vergés, J., Koshnaw, R., and Louterbach, M.: Petroleum tectonic comparison of fold and thrust belts: the Zagros of Iraq and Iran, the Pyrenees of Spain, the Sevier of Western USA and the Beni Sub-Andean of Bolivia, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 490, 79–103, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP490-2018-102, 2020.
Kent, P. E.: Recent Studies of South Persian Salt Plugs, AAPG Bull., 42, 2951–2972, https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d, 1958.
Kent, P. E.: Recent Studies of South Persian Salt Plugs, AAPG Bull., 42, 2951–2972, https://doi.org/10.1306/0bda5c2d-16bd-11d7-8645000102c1865d, 1958.
Khadivi, S., Mouthereau, F., Larrasoaña, J. C., Vergés, J., Lacombe, O., Khademi, E., Beamud, E., Melinte-Dobrinescu, M., and Suc, J. P.: Magnetochronology of synorogenic Miocene foreland sediments in the Fars arc of the Zagros Folded Belt (SW Iran), Basin Res., 22, 918–932, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00446.x, 2010.
Kiss, D., Duretz, T., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Tectonic inheritance controls nappe detachment, transport and stacking in the Helvetic nappe system, Switzerland: insights from thermomechanical simulations, Solid Earth, 11, 287–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-287-2020, 2020.
Koshnaw, R. I., Stockli, D. F., and Schlunegger, F.: Timing of the Arabia-Eurasia continental collision—Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of the Red Bed Series strata of the northwest Zagros hinterland, Kurdistan region of Iraq, Geology, 47, 47–50, https://doi.org/10.1130/G45499.1, 2019.
Koyi, H. A. and Mansurbeg, H.: The Role of Multiple Weak Lithologies in the Deformation of Cover Units in the Northwestern Segment of the Zagros FOLD-AND-THRUST Belt, J. Petrol. Geol., 44, 145–166, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12783, 2021.
Lacombe, O. and Mouthereau, F.: Basement-involved shortening and deep décollement tectonics in forelands of orogens: Insights from recent collision belts (Taiwan, Western Alps, Pyrenees), Tectonics, 21, 12–1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001TC901018, 2002.
Lacombe, O., Bellahsen, N., and Mouthereau, F.: Fracture patterns in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt (Fars, Iran): Constraints on early collisional tectonic history and role of basement faults, Geol. Mag., 148, 940–963, https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675681100029X, 2011.
Leturmy, P., Molinaro, M., and de Lamotte, D. F.: Structure, timing and morphological signature of hidden reverse basement faults in the Fars Arc of the Zagros (Iran), Geol. Soc. Sp., 330, 121–138, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.7, 2010.
Li, S. and Urai, J. L.: Rheology of rock salt for salt tectonics modeling, Petrol. Sci., 13, 712–724, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-016-0121-6, 2012.
Madanipour, S., Najafi, M., Nozaem, R., Vergés, J., Yassaghi, A., Heydari, I., Khodaparast, S., Soudmand, Z., and Aghajari, L.: The Arabia–Eurasia Collision Zone in Iran: Tectonostratigraphic and Structural Synthesis, J. Petrol. Geol., 47, 123–71, 2024.
McBeck, J., Cooke, M., Souloumiac, P., Maillot, B., and Mary, B.: The influence of detachment strength on the evolving deformational energy budget of physical accretionary prisms, Solid Earth, 9, 1421–1436, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1421-2018, 2018.
McQuarrie, N.: Crustal scale geometry of the Zagros fold–thrust belt, Iran, J. Struct. Geol., 26, 519–535, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2003.08.009, 2004.
McQuarrie, N. and Ehlers, T. A.: Techniques for understanding fold-and-thrust belt kinematics and thermal evolution, in: Linkages and Feedbacks in Orogenic Systems, edited by: Law, R. D., Thigpen, J. R., Merschat, A. J., and Stowell, H. H, Geological Society of America, Boulder, 25–54, https://doi.org/10.1130/2017.1213(02), 2017.
Mitra, S.: A unified kinematic model for the evolution of detachment folds, J. Struct. Geol., 25,1659-1673, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00198-0, 2003.
Molinaro, M., Leturmy, P., Guezou, J. C., Frizon de Lamotte, D., and Eshraghi, S. A.: The structure and kinematics of the southeastern Zagros fold-thrust belt, Iran: From thin-skinned to thick-skinned tectonics, Tectonics, 24, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001633, 2005.
Moresi, L., Dufour, F., Muhlhaus, H. B.: A Lagrangian integration point ?nite element method for large deformation modeling of viscoelastic geomaterials, J. Comput. Phys., 184, 476–497, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00031-1, 2003.
Moresi, L., Quenette, S., Lemiale, V., Meriaux, C., Appelbe, B., and Muhlhaus, H. B.: Computational approaches to studying non-linear dynamics of the crust and mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 163, 69–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009, 2007.
Morley, C. K., King, R., Hillis, R., Tingay, M., and Backe, G.: Deepwater fold and thrust belt classification, tectonics, structure and hydrocarbon prospectivity: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 104, 41–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.09.010, 2011.
Motamedi, H. and Gharabeigli, G.: Structural style in the Fars geological province: Interaction of diapirism and multidécollement folding, in: Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics, edited by: Farzipour Saein, A., Elsevier, 145–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-1.00009-3, 2019.
Motamedi, H., Sherkati, S., and Sepehr, M.: Structural style variation and its impact on hydrocarbon traps in central Fars, southern Zagros folded belt, Iran, J. Struct. Geol., 37, 124–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2012.01.021, 2012.
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., and Meyer, B.: The Zagros folded belt (Fars, Iran): Constraints from topography and critical wedge modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 165, 336–356, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02855.x, 2006.
Mouthereau, F., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Lacombe, O., De Boisgrollier, T., and Kargar, S.: Tertiary sequence of deformation in a thin-skinned/thick-skinned collision belt: The Zagros Folded Belt (Fars, Iran), Tectonics, 26, TC5006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002098, 2007a.
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Kargar, S., and Amrouch, K.: Mechanical Constraints on the Development of the Zagros Folded Belt (Fars), in: Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins, edited by: Lacombe, O., Roure, F., Lavé, J., Vergés, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247–266, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69426-7_13, 2007b.
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., and Vergés, J.: Building the Zagros collisional orogen: Timing, strain distribution and the dynamics of Arabia/Eurasia plate convergence, Tectonophysics, 532–535, 27–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022, 2012.
Najafi, M. and Lajmorak, S.: Contractional salt-tectonic system in the south Dezful embayment, Zagros, J. Struct. Geol., 141, 104–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104204, 2020.
Najafi, M., Yassaghi, A., Bahroudi, A., Vergés, J., and Sherkati, S.: Impact of the Late Triassic Dashtak intermediate décollement horizon on anticline geometry in the Central Frontal Fars, SE Zagros fold belt, Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 54, 23–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.02.010, 2014.
Najafi, M., Vergés, J., Etemad-Saeed, N., and Karimnejad, H. R.: Folding, thrusting and diapirism: Competing mechanisms for shaping the structure of the north Dezful Embayment, Zagros, Iran, Basin Res., 30, 1200–1229, https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12300, 2018.
Najafi, M., Beamud, E., Ruh, J., Mouthereau, F., Tahmasbi, A., Bernaola, G., Yassaghi, A., Motamedi, H., Sherkati, S., Goodarzi, M. G. H., and Vergés, J.: Pliocene growth of the Dowlatabad syncline in Frontal Fars arc: Folding propagation across the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran, GSA Bulletin, 133, 1381–1403, https://doi.org/10.1130/B35748.1, 2021.
Navabpour, P., Angelier, J., and Barrier, E.: Mesozoic extensional brittle tectonics of the Arabian passive margin, inverted in the Zagros collision (Iran, interior Fars), Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 330, 65–96, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP330.5, 2010.
Nilforoushan, F., Masson, F., Vernant, P., Vigny, C., Martinod, J., Abbassi, M., Nankali, H., Hatzfeld, D., Bayer, R., Tavakoli, F., Ashtiani, A., Doerflinger, E., Daignières, M., Collard, P., and Chéry, J.: GPS network monitors the Arabia–Eurasia collision deformation in Iran, J. Geodesy, 77, 411–422, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0326-5, 2003.
Nilfouroushan, F., Pysklywec, R., Cruden, A., and Koyi, H.: Thermal-mechanical modeling of salt-based mountain belts with pre-existing basement faults: Application to the Zagros fold and thrust belt, southwest Iran, Tectonics, 32, 1212–1226, https://doi.org/10.1002/tect.20075, 2013.
Nissen, E., Tatar, M., Jackson, J. A., and Allen, M. B.: New views on earthquake faulting in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt of Iran, Geophys. J. Int., 186, 928–944, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05119.x, 2011.
Nissen, E., Jackson, J., Jahani, S., and Tatar, M.: Zagros “phantom earthquakes” reassessed—The interplay of seismicity and deep salt flow in the Simply Folded Belt?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 3561–3583, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010796, 2014.
Nissen, E., Ghods, A., Karasözen, E., Elliott, J. R., Barnhart, W. D., Bergman, E. A., Hayes, G. P., Jamal-Reyhani, M., Nemati, M., Tan, F., and Abdulnaby, W.: The 12 November 2017Mw 7.3 Ezgeleh-Sarpolzahab (Iran) earthquake and active tectonics of the Lurestan Arc, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 2124–2152, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016221, 2019.
Orjuela, M.Á., Martínez-Sánchez, D. A., and Jiménez, G.: Structural changes caused by dips in lateral ramps of fold and thrust belts, Boletín de Geología, 43, 29–44, https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v43n2-2021002, 2021.
Parizot, O., Missenard, Y., Barbarand, J., Blaise, T., Benedicto, A., Haurine, F., and Sarda, P.: How sensitive are intraplate inherited structures? Insight from the Cévennes Fault System (Languedoc, SE France), Geol. Mag., 159, 2082–2094, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756822000152, 2022.
Pfiffner, O. A.: Thick-skinned and thin-skinned tectonics: A global perspective, Geosciences, 7, 71, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030071, 2017.
Pfiffner, O. A., Schlunegger, F., and Buiter, S. J. H.: The Swiss Alps and their peripheral foreland basin: Stratigraphic response to deep crustal processes, Tectonics, 21, 3–1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000TC900039, 2002.
Pirouz, M., Avouac, J. P., Hassanzadeh, J., Kirschvink, J. L., and Bahroudi, A.: Early Neogene foreland of the Zagros, implications for the initial closure of the Neo-Tethys and kinematics of crustal shortening, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 477, 168–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.046, 2017.
Pla, O., Roca, E., Xie, H., Izquierdo-Llavall, E., Muñoz, J. A., Rowan, M. G., Ferrer, O., Gratacós, Ò., Yuan, N., and Huang, S.: Influence of syntectonic sedimentation and décollement rheology on the geometry and evolution of orogenic wedges: Analog modeling of the Kuqa fold-and-thrust belt (NW China), Tectonics, 38, 2727–2755, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005386, 2019.
Pohn, H. A.: Lateral ramps in the folded Appalachians and in overthrust belts worldwide: A fundamental element of thrust-belt architecture, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 63, ISBN 0607962283, 2000.
Priestley, K., McKenzie, D., Barron, J., Tatar, M., and Debayle, E.: The Zagros core: Deformation of the continental lithospheric mantle, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004435, 2012.
Ranalli, G. and Murphy, D. C.: Rheological stratification of the lithosphere, Tectonophysics, 132, 281–295, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90348-9, 1987.
Regard, V., Bellier, O., Thomas, J. C., Abbassi, M. R., Mercier, J., Shabanian, E., Feghhi, K., and Soleymani, S.: Accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia convergence in the Zagros-Makran transfer zone, SE Iran: A transition between collision and subduction through a young deforming system, Tectonics, 23, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001599, 2004.
Ruh, J. B. and Vergés, J.: Effects of reactivated extensional basement faults on structural evolution of fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical modelling applied to the Kopet Dagh Mountains, Tectonophysics, 746, 493–511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.020, 2018.
Ruh, J. B., Kaus, B. J. P., and Burg, J. P.: Numerical investigation of deformation mechanics in fold-and-thrust belts: Influence of rheology of single and multiple décollements, Tectonics, 31, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC003047, 2012.
Ruh, J. B., Hirt, A. M., Burg, J. P., and Mohammadi, A.: Forward propagation of the Zagros Simply Folded Belt constrained from magnetostratigraphy of growth strata, Tectonics, 33, 1534–1551, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013TC003465, 2014.
Ruh, J. B., Tokle, L., and Behr, W. M.: Grain-size-evolution controls on lithospheric weakening during continental rifting, Nat. Geosci., 15, 585–590, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00964-9, 2022.
Santolaria, P., Harris, L. B., Casas, A. M., and Soto, R.: Influence of décollement-cover thickness variations in fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from centrifuge analog modeling, J. Struct. Geol., 163, 104704, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2022.104704, 2022.
Saura, E., Vergés, J., Homke, S., Blanc, E., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Casciello, E., and Hunt, D. W.: Basin architecture and growth folding of the NW Zagros early foreland basin during the Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary, J. Geol. Soc., 168, 235–250, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-092, 2011.
Sepehr, M. and Cosgrove, J. W.: Structural framework of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 21, 829–843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.07.006, 2004.
Sharp, I., Gillespie, P., Morsalnezhad, D., Taberner, C., Karpuz, R., Vergés, J., Horbury, A., Pickard, N., Garland, J., and Hunt, D.: Stratigraphic architecture and fracture-controlled dolomitization of the Cretaceous Khami and Bangestan groups: an outcrop case study, Zagros Mountains, Iran, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 329, 343–396, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP329.14, 2010.
Sherkati, S. and Letouzey, J.: Variation of structural style and basin evolution in the central Zagros (Izeh zone and Dezful Embayment), Iran, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 21, 535–554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.01.007, 2004.
Sherkati, S., Molinaro, M., Frizon de Lamotte, D., and Letouzey, J.: Décollement folding in the Central and Eastern Zagros fold-belt (Iran): Salt mobility, multiple décollements and late basement control, J. Struct. Geol., 27, 1680–1696, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.010, 2005.
Sherkati, S., Letouzey, J., and De Lamotte, D. F.: Central Zagros fold-thrust belt (Iran): New insights from seismic data, field observation, and sandbox modeling, Tectonics, 25, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004TC001766, 2006.
Simpson, G. D.: Mechanical modelling of folding versus faulting in brittle–ductile wedges, J. Struct. Geol., 31, 369–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.01.011, 2009.
Simpson, G. D.: Formation of accretionary prisms influenced by sediment subduction and supplied by sediments from adjacent continents, Geology, 38, 131–134, https://doi.org/10.1130/G30461.1, 2010.
Simpson, G.: Mechanics of non-critical fold–thrust belts based on finite element models, Tectonophysics, 499, 142–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.01.004, 2011.
Snidero, M., Carrera, N., Mencos, J., Butillé, M., Granado, P., Tavani, S., Lopez-Mir, B., Sàbat, F., and Muñoz, J. A.: Diapir kinematics in a multi-layer salt system from the eastern Persian Gulf, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 117, 104402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104402, 2020.
Spitz, R., Bauville, A., Epard, J.-L., Kaus, B. J. P., Popov, A. A., and Schmalholz, S. M.: Control of 3-D tectonic inheritance on fold-and-thrust belts: insights from 3-D numerical models and application to the Helvetic nappe system, Solid Earth, 11, 999–1026, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-999-2020, 2020.
Stöcklin, J.: Possible ancient continental margins in Iran, in: The geology of continental margins, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 873—887, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_64, 1974.
Stockmal, G. S., Beaumont, C., Nguyen, M., and Lee, B.: Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical models, in: Whence the Mountains? Inquiries into the Evolution of Orogenic Systems: A Volume in Honor of Raymond A. Price, edited by: Sears, J. W., Harms, T. A., and Evenchick, C. A., Geological Society of America Special, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA, 63–98, https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2433(04), 2007.
Stöckhert, B., Brix, M. R., Kleinschrodt, R., Hurford, A. J., and Wirth, R.: Thermochronometry and microstructures of quartz — a comparison with experimental flow laws and predictions on the temperature of the brittle-plastic transition, J. Struct. Geol., 21, 351–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00138-0, 1999.
Szabo, F. and Kheradpir, A.: Permian and Triassic stratigraphy, Zagros basin, south-west Iran, J. Petrol. Geol., 1, 57–82, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1978.tb00611.x, 1978.
Taghikhani, H., Yassaghi, A., Madanipour, S., and Najafi, M.: Salt tectonics along the High Zagros Fault in Iran, faulting through welded salt walls, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 259, 105928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105928, 2024.
Talbot, C. J. and Alavi, M.: The past of a future syntaxis across the Zagros, Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ., 100, 89–109, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.100.01.08, 1996.
Talebian, M. and Jackson, J.: A reappraisal of earthquake focal mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountains of Iran, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 506–526, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02092.x, 2004.
Tatar, M., Hatzfeld, D., and Ghafory-Ashtiany, M.: Tectonics of the Central Zagros (Iran) deduced from microearthquake seismicity, Geophys. J. Int., 156, 255–266, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02145.x, 2004.
Tavani, S., Storti, F., Lacombe, O., Corradetti, A., Muñoz, J. A., and Mazzoli, S.: A review of deformation pattern templates in foreland basin systems and fold-and-thrust belts: Implications for the state of stress in the frontal regions of thrust wedges, Earth-Sci. Rev., 141, 82–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.013, 2015.
Tavani, S., Parente, M., Vitale, S., Iannace, A., Corradetti, A., Bottini, C., Morsalnejad, D., and Mazzoli, S.: Early Jurassic rifting of the Arabian passive continental margin of the Neo-Tethys. Field evidence from the Lurestan region of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Iran, Tectonics, 37, 2586–2607, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005192, 2018.
Teknik, V. and Ghods, A.: Depth of magnetic basement in Iran based on fractal spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 209, 1878–1891, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx132, 2017.
Tunini, L., Jiménez-Munt, I., Fernandez, M., Vergés, J., and Villasenor, A.: Lithospheric mantle heterogeneities beneath the Zagros Mountains and the Iranian Plateau: a petrological-geophysical study, Geophys. J. Int., 200, 596–614, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu418, 2014.
van Zelst, I., Crameri, F., Pusok, A. E., Glerum, A., Dannberg, J., and Thieulot, C.: 101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth, Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022, 2022.
Vergés, J., Goodarzi, M. G. H., Emami, H., Karpuz, R., Efstathiou, J., and Gillespie, P.: Multiple detachmnet folding in Pusht-e Kuh Arc, zagros: Role of mechanical stratigraphy, AAPG Memoir., 94, 69–94, https://doi.org/10.1306/13251333M942899, 2011.
Vergés, J., Emami, H., Garcés, M., Beamud, E., Homke, S., and Skott, P.: Zagros foreland fold belt timing across Lurestan to constrain Arabia–Iran collision, in: Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics, Vol. 3, edited by: Mukherjee, S., Elsevier, 29–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815048-4.00003-7, 2019.
Vergés, J., Casini, G., Ruh, J., Cosgrove, J., Sherkati, S., Najafi, M., Casciello, E., Saura, E., Fard, I. A., Piryaei, A., and de Lamotte, D. F.: Structural style and timing of NW-SE trending Zagros folds in SW Iran: Interaction with north-south trending Arabian folds and implications for petroleum geology, J. Petrol. Geol., 47, 3–73, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12850, 2024.
Vogt, K., Matenco, L., and Cloetingh, S.: Crustal mechanics control the geometry of mountain belts. Insights from numerical modelling, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 460, 12–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.016, 2017.
Wallace, W. K. and Homza, T. X.: Décollement folds with fixed hinges and variable décollement depth, northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska: Reply, J. Struct. Geol., 20, 1591–1595, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00040-6, 1998.
Walpersdorf, A., Hatzfeld, D., Nankali, H., Tavakoli, F., Nilforoushan, F., Tatar, M., Vernant, P., Chéry, J., and Masson, F.: Difference in the GPS deformation pattern of North and Central Zagros (Iran), Geophys. J. Int., 167, 1077–1088, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03147.x, 2006.
White, S. H., Bretan, P. G., and Rutter, E. H.: Fault-zone reactivation: kinematics and mechanisms, Philos. T. R. Soc. S.-A, 317, 81–97, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1986.0026, 1986.
Wilks, K. R. and Carter, N. L.: Rheology of some continental lower crustal rocks, Tectonophysics, 182, 57–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90342-6, 1990.
Wortel, R., Govers, R., and Spakman, W.: Continental Collision and the STEP-Wise Evolution of Convergent Plate Boundaries: From Structure to Dynamics, in: Subduction Zone Geodynamics, edited by: Lallemand, S. and Funiciello, F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 47–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_3, 2009.
Yamato, P., Kaus, B. J. P., Mouthereau, F., and Castelltort, S.: Dynamic constraints on the crustal-scale rheology of the Zagros fold belt, Iran, Geology, 39, 815–818, https://doi.org/10.1130/G32136.1, 2011.
Zwaan, F., Schreurs, G., Buiter, S. J. H., Ferrer, O., Reitano, R., Rudolf, M., and Willingshofer, E.: Analogue modelling of basin inversion: a review and future perspectives, Solid Earth, 13, 1859–1905, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1859-2022, 2022.