44 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Simulation of Paleotectonic Stress Fields and Distribution Prediction of Tectonic Fractures at the Hudi Coal Mine, Qinshui Basin H. FANG et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13447
2. Wellbore stability analysis based on the combination of geomechanical and petrophysical studies A. Ounegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103016
3. Present-day in situ stress distribution in shale oil reservoirs of Boxing subsag from 1D mechanical earth model and 3D geomechanical model W. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-026-1242-x
4. The present-day stress field of Australia M. Rajabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.003
5. Present-Day In Situ Stress Analysis in Shale Reservoir of Haiba Block, Southern Sichuan Basin, South China W. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3249570
6. Tectonic Fractures in the Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation of Qingxi Oilfield, Jiuxi Basin, NW China. Part two: Numerical simulation of tectonic stress field and prediction of tectonic fractures W. Ju & W. Sun https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.002
7. 3D crustal stress state of Germany according to a data-calibrated geomechanical model S. Ahlers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1777-2021
8. Rock joint detection from 3D point clouds based on colour space Y. Ge et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2023-012
9. 3-D geomechanical–numerical model of the contemporary crustal stress state in the Alberta Basin (Canada) K. Reiter & O. Heidbach https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-1123-2014
10. Geomechanical Modeling of Stress and Fracture Distribution during Contractional Fault-Related Folding J. Feng & K. Gu https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.511006
11. Stress Distribution in the Upper Shihezi Formation from 1D Mechanical Earth Model and 3D Heterogeneous Geomechanical Model, Linxing Region, Eastern Ordos Basin, Central China W. JU et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.14411
12. Building 1D and 3D Mechanical Earth Models for Underground Gas Storage—A Case Study from the Molasse Basin, Southern Germany M. Zain-Ul-Abedin & A. Henk https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215722
13. A method for modeling multiscale geomechanical effects in the stimulated rock volume S. Busetti https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2020-0090.1
14. Representation of faults in reservoir-scale geomechanical finite element models – A comparison of different modelling approaches T. Treffeisen & A. Henk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.103931
15. Stress sensitivity in naturally fractured reservoirs: a case study of the Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation, Qingxi Oilfield, Jiuxi Basin, northwestern China W. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-019-0022-y
16. Characteristics of in-situ stress state and prediction of the permeability in the Upper Permian coalbed methane reservoir, western Guizhou region, SW China W. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.02.037
17. The 3D stress state from geomechanical–numerical modelling and its uncertainties: a case study in the Bavarian Molasse Basin M. Ziegler & O. Heidbach https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-020-00162-z
18. Faults as Volumetric Weak Zones in Reservoir-Scale Hydro-Mechanical Finite Element Models—A Comparison Based on Grid Geometry, Mesh Resolution and Fault Dip T. Treffeisen & A. Henk https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102673
19. Method and application for ultra-deep carbonate reservoir quality evaluation: A case study of the Well X area in the Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin, China K. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnggs.2025.07.001
20. Increasing accuracy of 3-D geomechanical-numerical models M. Ziegler & O. Heidbach https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae096
21. 3D in situ stress state modelling and fault reactivation risk exemplified in the Ruhr region (Germany) M. Kruszewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2022.100386
22. Normal fault localization controls during syn- and post-orogenic extension affecting thin-skinned architecture M. Nemčok et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105243
23. Research and Application of Geomechanics Using 3D Model of Deep Shale Gas in Luzhou Block, Sichuan Basin, Southwest China Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15020065
24. Simulation of tectonic stress field and prediction of tectonic fracture distribution in Longmaxi Formation in Lintanchang area of eastern Sichuan Basin D. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1024748
25. Effect of overburden spatial variability on field-scale geomechanical modeling of potential CO2 storage site Smeaheia, offshore Norway M. Rahman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104453
26. Prediction of natural fractures in the Lower Jurassic Ahe Formation of the Dibei Gasfield, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, NW China W. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0039-z
27. 3D mechanical earth model for Zubair oilfield in southern Iraq N. Al-Zubaidi & A. Al-Neeamy https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-020-00863-y
28. Assessing mechanical response of CO2 storage into a depleted carbonate reef using a site-scale geomechanical model calibrated with field tests and InSAR monitoring data S. Raziperchikolaee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103744
29. Paleotectonic stress field modeling and prediction of natural fractures in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale reservoirs, Nanchuan region, South China W. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.10.052
30. Application ofin situstress estimation methods in wellbore stability analysis under isotropic and anisotropic conditions R. Gholami et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/12/4/657
31. Spatial influence of fault-related stress perturbations in northern Switzerland L. Velagala et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-179-2026
32. Bayesian Quantification and Reduction of Uncertainties in 3D Geomechanical‐Numerical Models M. Ziegler & O. Heidbach https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024855
33. An open-access stress magnitude database for Germany and adjacent regions S. Morawietz et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-020-00178-5
34. Building 1D and 3D static reservoir geomechanical properties models in the oil field M. Sanei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01553-7
35. About the trustworthiness of physics-based machine learning – considerations for geomechanical applications D. Degen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-477-2025
36. Prediction of tectonic fractures in coal reservoirs using geomechanical method X. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0072-y
37. Present-day in situ stress prediction in Bozi 3 deep sandstone reservoir, Kuqa Depression: implications for gas development H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07847-0
38. A continuous, proxy-based rock mechanical approach for developing mechanical frameworks at CO2 storage sites E. Tenthorey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.028
39. Stress field sensitivity analysis in a sedimentary sequence of the Alpine foreland, northern Switzerland T. Hergert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-533-2015
40. Prediction of tectonic fractures in low permeability sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Es3m reservoir in the Block Shishen 100 and adjacent regions, Dongying Depression W. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.068
41. 3D Field-Scale Geomechanical Modeling of Potential CO2 Storage Site Smeaheia, Offshore Norway M. Rahman et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041407
42. Geomechanical modeling using finite element method for prediction of in-situ stress in Krishna–Godavari basin, India D. Singha & R. Chatterjee https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.10.003
43. Stress prediction using 1D and 3D geomechanical models of a tight gas reservoir—A case study from the Lower Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia C. Guerra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2019.01.002
44. Are low-stress zones possible with ultradeep and intense extrusion? J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108990