Journal cover Journal topic
Solid Earth An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 2.921
IF2.921
IF 5-year value: 3.087
IF 5-year
3.087
CiteScore value: 4.8
CiteScore
4.8
SNIP value: 1.314
SNIP1.314
IPP value: 2.87
IPP2.87
SJR value: 0.993
SJR0.993
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 38
Scimago H
index
38
h5-index value: 36
h5-index36
Volume 6, issue 2
Solid Earth, 6, 727–745, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-727-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Solid Earth, 6, 727–745, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-727-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Method article 17 Jun 2015

Method article | 17 Jun 2015

Uncertainty in mapped geological boundaries held by a national geological survey:eliciting the geologists' tacit error model

R. M. Lark et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Boundaries on geological maps are drawn by geologists interpreting evidence (boreholes, surface features, etc.) in light of their geological knowledge. Boundaries are therefore uncertain, and this must be quantified so that map users can make sound decisions. In this paper we show how we can find statistical models of the uncertainty of boundary positions by a structured method to elicit the tacit model of uncertainty which experienced field geologists use when interpreting geological maps.
Boundaries on geological maps are drawn by geologists interpreting evidence (boreholes, surface...
Citation