Articles | Volume 7, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-1217-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-1217-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
18 Aug 2016
Research article |
| 18 Aug 2016
Geoscientific process monitoring with positron emission tomography (GeoPET)
Johannes Kulenkampff
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Resource Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
Marion Gründig
Institute of Resource Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
Abdelhamid Zakhnini
Institute of Resource Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
Johanna Lippmann-Pipke
Institute of Resource Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 2,798 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Mar 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,322 | 1,253 | 223 | 2,798 | 154 | 156 |
- HTML: 1,322
- PDF: 1,253
- XML: 223
- Total: 2,798
- BibTeX: 154
- EndNote: 156
Total article views: 2,148 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Aug 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,077 | 848 | 223 | 2,148 | 153 | 155 |
- HTML: 1,077
- PDF: 848
- XML: 223
- Total: 2,148
- BibTeX: 153
- EndNote: 155
Total article views: 650 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Mar 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 245 | 405 | 0 | 650 | 1 | 1 |
- HTML: 245
- PDF: 405
- XML: 0
- Total: 650
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 1
Cited
12 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Review of Microfluidic Devices and Imaging Techniques for Fluid Flow Study in Porous Geomaterials A. Jahanbakhsh et al. 10.3390/s20144030
- Time-lapse 3D imaging by positron emission tomography of Cu mobilized in a soil column by the herbicide MCPA J. Kulenkampff et al. 10.1038/s41598-018-25413-9
- Transport in tight material enlightened by process tomography J. Kulenkampff et al. 10.5194/sand-1-293-2021
- Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review C. Windows-Yule et al. 10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c
- Expanding PET-applications in life sciences with positron-emitters beyond fluorine-18 H. Coenen & J. Ermert 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.07.003
- From the Outside in: An Overview of Positron Imaging of Plant and Soil Processes M. Schmidt et al. 10.1177/1536012120966405
- Quantitative experimental monitoring of molecular diffusion in clay with positron emission tomography J. Kulenkampff et al. 10.5194/se-7-1207-2016
- Positron emission tomography in water resources and subsurface energy resources engineering research C. Zahasky et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.03.003
- Benchmarking PET for geoscientific applications: 3D quantitative diffusion coefficient determination in clay rock J. Lippmann-Pipke et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.01.002
- Glutamic acid leaching of synthetic covellite – A model system combining experimental data and geochemical modeling R. Barthen et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.138
- Effect of pH on the mobility of the herbicide MCPA in a sand-goethite column: 1D and 2D reactive transport modeling H. Lippold et al. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.10.010
- Pore-scale tomography and imaging: applications, techniques and recommended practice M. Halisch et al. 10.5194/se-7-1141-2016
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Review of Microfluidic Devices and Imaging Techniques for Fluid Flow Study in Porous Geomaterials A. Jahanbakhsh et al. 10.3390/s20144030
- Time-lapse 3D imaging by positron emission tomography of Cu mobilized in a soil column by the herbicide MCPA J. Kulenkampff et al. 10.1038/s41598-018-25413-9
- Transport in tight material enlightened by process tomography J. Kulenkampff et al. 10.5194/sand-1-293-2021
- Recent advances in positron emission particle tracking: a comparative review C. Windows-Yule et al. 10.1088/1361-6633/ac3c4c
- Expanding PET-applications in life sciences with positron-emitters beyond fluorine-18 H. Coenen & J. Ermert 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.07.003
- From the Outside in: An Overview of Positron Imaging of Plant and Soil Processes M. Schmidt et al. 10.1177/1536012120966405
- Quantitative experimental monitoring of molecular diffusion in clay with positron emission tomography J. Kulenkampff et al. 10.5194/se-7-1207-2016
- Positron emission tomography in water resources and subsurface energy resources engineering research C. Zahasky et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.03.003
- Benchmarking PET for geoscientific applications: 3D quantitative diffusion coefficient determination in clay rock J. Lippmann-Pipke et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.01.002
- Glutamic acid leaching of synthetic covellite – A model system combining experimental data and geochemical modeling R. Barthen et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.138
- Effect of pH on the mobility of the herbicide MCPA in a sand-goethite column: 1D and 2D reactive transport modeling H. Lippold et al. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.10.010
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 07 Jun 2023
Short summary
Transport processes can be observed with input–output experiments, disregarding the impact of heterogeneities, or they can be modelled, based on structural images. In contrast, positron emission tomography (PET) directly yields the spatio-temporal distribution of tracer concentration. PET benefits from its molecular sensitivity together with a reasonable resolution. We illustrate its use with examples of process monitoring of advection and diffusion processes, and we discuss benefits and limits.
Transport processes can be observed with input–output experiments, disregarding the impact of...
