Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2017-13
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2017-13
01 Mar 2017
 | 01 Mar 2017
Status: this preprint has been retracted.

The effects of tillage methods on soil aggregation and crop yields in a wheat-corn rotation under semi-arid conditions

Hossein Tabiehzad, Gokhan Cayci, and Kiarash Afshar Pour Rezaeieh

Abstract. In this study, the effects of different tillage methods under wheat-corn two-course rotation system on the some soil aggregation properties and yields were investigated. Experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications during four crop years. Subsoiler, moldboard, sweep and chisel as main plots and rotary tiller and disc harrow as sub-plots have been used in this study. The results showed that tillage methods were significant at (P < 0.01) as regards crop yields, and the highest yields as 6249 and 11720 kg/ha for wheat and 9891 and 73080 kg/ha for corn grain and biomass were produced in subsoiler treatment, respectively. Subsoiler+rotarytiller treatment was significant at (P < 0.05) with 2.063 mm as to mean weight diameter (MWD) value. The subsoiler and chisel were statistically in the same group with regard of water stable aggregates (WSA) value, and it was significant at (P < 0.05) with 67,83 %. Bulk density, total porosity and air porosity values were significant at (P < 0.01), and 1.38 grcm-3, 51.2 % and 12.5 % values were determined in rotary tiller application, respectively. Field capacity (FC) and permanent wilting point (PWP) were significant at (P < 0.05) and (P < 0.01) with 31.89 % and 17.21 % values in the chisel treatment, respectively. Crop yields and positive effects on the physical properties were considered subsoiler+rotary tiller treatment was the most successful, and it was followed by chisel+rotary tiller treatment according to four-year study results. Key words: Soil quality, subsoiler, chiesel, soil structure

This preprint has been retracted.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Hossein Tabiehzad, Gokhan Cayci, and Kiarash Afshar Pour Rezaeieh

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Hossein Tabiehzad, Gokhan Cayci, and Kiarash Afshar Pour Rezaeieh
Hossein Tabiehzad, Gokhan Cayci, and Kiarash Afshar Pour Rezaeieh

Viewed

Total article views: 1,374 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
772 498 104 1,374 83 99
  • HTML: 772
  • PDF: 498
  • XML: 104
  • Total: 1,374
  • BibTeX: 83
  • EndNote: 99
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,242 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,240 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been retracted.