Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-4
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-4
15 Jan 2019
 | 15 Jan 2019
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal SE but the revision was not accepted.

Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models

Hugo K. H. Olierook, Richard Scalzo, David Kohn, Rohitash Chandra, Ehsan Farahbakhsh, Gregory Houseman, Chris Clark, Steven M. Reddy, and R. Dietmar Müller

Abstract. Traditional approaches to develop 3D geological models employ a mix of quantitative and qualitative scientific techniques, which do not fully provide quantification of uncertainty in the constructed models and fail to optimally weight geological field observations against constraints from geophysical data. Here, we demonstrate a Bayesian methodology to fuse geological field observations with aeromagnetic and gravity data to build robust 3D models in a 13.5 × 13.5 km region of the Gascoyne Province, Western Australia. Our approach is validated by comparing model results to independently-constrained geological maps and cross-sections produced by the Geological Survey of Western Australia. By fusing geological field data with magnetics and gravity surveys, we show that at 89 % of the modelled region has > 95 % certainty. The boundaries between geological units are characterized by narrow regions with < 95 % certainty, which are typically 400–1000 m wide at the Earth's surface and 500–2000 m wide at depth. Beyond ~ 4 km depth, the model requires drill hole data and geophysical survey data with longer wavelengths (e.g., active seismic) to constrain the deeper subsurface. Our results show that surface geological observations fused with geophysical survey data yield robust 3D geological models with narrow uncertainty regions at the surface and shallow subsurface, which will be especially valuable for mineral exploration and the development of 3D geological models under cover.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Hugo K. H. Olierook, Richard Scalzo, David Kohn, Rohitash Chandra, Ehsan Farahbakhsh, Gregory Houseman, Chris Clark, Steven M. Reddy, and R. Dietmar Müller
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Hugo K. H. Olierook, Richard Scalzo, David Kohn, Rohitash Chandra, Ehsan Farahbakhsh, Gregory Houseman, Chris Clark, Steven M. Reddy, and R. Dietmar Müller
Hugo K. H. Olierook, Richard Scalzo, David Kohn, Rohitash Chandra, Ehsan Farahbakhsh, Gregory Houseman, Chris Clark, Steven M. Reddy, and R. Dietmar Müller

Viewed

Total article views: 1,702 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,119 492 91 1,702 95 92
  • HTML: 1,119
  • PDF: 492
  • XML: 91
  • Total: 1,702
  • BibTeX: 95
  • EndNote: 92
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,313 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,307 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024