Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2021-151
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2021-151
 
04 Jan 2022
04 Jan 2022
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Regional mantle viscosity constraints for North America reveal upper mantle strength differences across the continent

Anthony Osei Tutu and Christopher Harig Anthony Osei Tutu and Christopher Harig
  • Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson

Abstract. We present regional constraints of mantle viscosity for North America using a local Bayesian joint inversion of mantle flow and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) models. Our localized mantle flow model uses new local geoid kernels created via spatio-spectral localization using Slepain basis functions, convolved with seismically derived mantle density to calculate and constrain against the regional free-air gravity field. The joint inversion with GIA uses two deglaciation of ice sheet models (GLAC1D-NA and ICE-6G-NA) and surface relative sea level data. We solve for the local 1D mantle viscosity structure for the entire North America (NA) region, the eastern region including Hudson Bay, and the western region of North America extending into the Pacific plate.

Our results for the entire NA region show one order of magnitude viscosity jump at the 670 km boundary using a high seismic density scaling parameter (e.g., δlnp/δlnvs = 0.3). Seismic scaling parameter demonstrates significant influence on the resulting viscosity profile. However, when the NA region is further localized into eastern and western parts, the scaling factor becomes much less important for dictating the resulting upper mantle viscosity characteristics. Rather the respective local mantle density heterogeneities provide the dominate control on the upper mantle viscosity. We infer local 1D viscosity profiles that reflect the respective tectonic settings of each region's upper mantle, including a weak and shallow asthenosphere layer in the west, and deep sharp viscosity jumps in the eastern transition zone, below the suggested/proposed depth range of the eastern continental root.

Anthony Osei Tutu and Christopher Harig

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on se-2021-151', Tanghua Li, 22 Feb 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on se-2021-151', Wouter van der Wal, 23 Mar 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on se-2021-151', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Mar 2022

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on se-2021-151', Tanghua Li, 22 Feb 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on se-2021-151', Wouter van der Wal, 23 Mar 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on se-2021-151', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Mar 2022

Anthony Osei Tutu and Christopher Harig

Anthony Osei Tutu and Christopher Harig

Viewed

Total article views: 558 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
460 83 15 558 6 6
  • HTML: 460
  • PDF: 83
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 558
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 497 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 497 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 May 2022
Download
Short summary
The Earth’s surface deforms due to surface mass load such as ice sheets and subsurface dynamics. Sea level and GPS data show North America (NA) is undergoing surface deformation, due to past ice loads and/or Earth’s interior pull by dense material. We employ mathematical methods and computer simulations to study the region viscosity/strength as a function of depth using a localization technique. Our results show the east of NA has a stiff interface compared to the western part.