Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1385-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1385-2019
Research article
 | 
21 Aug 2019
Research article |  | 21 Aug 2019

What happens to fracture energy in brittle fracture? Revisiting the Griffith assumption

Timothy R. H. Davies, Maurice J. McSaveney, and Natalya V. Reznichenko

Viewed

Total article views: 3,456 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,176 1,108 172 3,456 121 106
  • HTML: 2,176
  • PDF: 1,108
  • XML: 172
  • Total: 3,456
  • BibTeX: 121
  • EndNote: 106
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Apr 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Apr 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,456 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,718 with geography defined and 738 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Griffith (1921) assumed that energy used to create new surface area by breaking intact rock immediately becomes surface energy which is not available for further breakage. Our lab data disprove this assumption; we created much more new surface area, 90 % on submicron fragments, than the energy involved should allow. As technology allows ever smaller fragments to be measured, continued use of the Griffith assumption will lead to incorrect energy budgets for earthquakes and rock avalanches.