The authors have provided satisfactory answers to all remarks, requests and suggestions provided by the two reviewers ; nevertheless, before final acceptance, the clarity and the quality of the text could benefit from i) some minor changes (listed below) and, most important, ii) a careful proofreading (a non-exhaustive list is provided here)

Examples of Proofreading
Line 16 « showed »….show ?
Line 27 « no a single »….no single…
Line 49 «may be»……can be
Line 101 “Highlighted”…highlight
Line 124 “transitional”….dual/bimodal?
Line 141 the sentence suggests that there was no volcanic activity between 1994 and 1998? Is 1998 the start of a new cycle after long quiescence? Please clarify
Line 223 “correct”…corrected
Line 367 below 0.01 not > 0.01 m3/s
Line 390 FT applied to…please mention explicitly the dataset
Line 541 …able “to” describe
Line 548 deciphering “the”…

Minor changes
In fig 3, it could be useful to add a legend about eruptive behavior, similar to that adopted for figure 2; that would allow a closer link between the observational datasets and the identification of frequency change in the extrusion rate time series

Please mention the dataset (FT of….) to the caption of the A4 appendix figure

Dear authors,
thank you for submitting your work to Solid Earth.
I have now read your manuscript after receiving a recommendation from the handling topical editor. In principle I agree with this recommendation, however, I request the following technical corrections before the paper can be accepted for publication.


l44 onward: Volcanoes, including Santiaguito (Guatemala, Harris et al., 2003), Mt St Helens (USA, Swanson and Holcomb,
1990), and Soufrière Hills (Montserrat, Voight et al., 1998; Loughlin et al., 2010; Wadge et al.,
2010; Nicholson et al., 2011) have shown periodic dome growth.

l47: Periodicity in eruption parameters can be complex....long wavelengths.

l88: Although still under debate

l241: delete "largely"

l248: of wavelets

l549 to describe
l553 delete "fully"

The following statements are ambiguous and need to be clarified. Also make sure you include a sentence on the availability of the wavelet analyis code and check the English.
Code availability
573 Melnik and Costa (2014) code is a research software and is not still available for distribution as it
574 lacks of documentation. It can be used by contacting the authors under their supervision.
575 576
577 Data availability


l 578 The original .... is available from www.mirovaweb.it. Excel worksheets can be obtained from the authors.


___

With best wishes
J.Gottsmann
Executive Editor SE