Dear authors,
thank you for the work you did for improving your manuscript; you have well addressed the requests from reviewer#1. Anyways, before the manuscript can be considered for publication, I would like to ask you to consider further the comments of reviewer#2. In particular regarding the comparison of your results with previous literature. What seems to be missing in this manuscript is some reasoning and understanding on why the anisotropy is encountered there, and how this fits within the local structural and tectonic setting. In your reply you state that you have considered the literature suggested by reviewer#2, but indeed there is just a brief citation of the papers mentioned by him. Therefore, for increasing the impact of this work the following points have to be addressed in the manuscript:
1) some more introduction in why it is important to give constraints on anisotropy in the study area,
2) how the detection and characterization of anisotropy might help addressing some major unresolved issues about this area, also related to seismic hazard
3) is the anisotropy stress- or structure-controlled? Can you give some inferences?
Fore replying to these questions you might refer to some papers like Hurd and Bonhoff 2012; Licciardi et al; 2018, Polat et al, 2012.
Moreover, you might consider to include one more picture in which your results are directly compared to previous results.