Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2411-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2411-2020
Method article
 | 
11 Dec 2020
Method article |  | 11 Dec 2020

Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods

Chaojie Cheng, Sina Hale, Harald Milsch, and Philipp Blum

Viewed

Total article views: 4,418 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,653 1,628 137 4,418 190 162 198
  • HTML: 2,653
  • PDF: 1,628
  • XML: 137
  • Total: 4,418
  • Supplement: 190
  • BibTeX: 162
  • EndNote: 198
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,418 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,097 with geography defined and 321 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 13 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Fluids (like water or gases) within the Earth's crust often flow and interact with rock through fractures. The efficiency with which these fluids may flow through this void space is controlled by the width of the fracture(s). In this study, three different physical methods to measure fracture width were applied and compared and their predictive accuracy was evaluated. As a result, the mobile methods tested may well be applied in the field if a number of limitations and requirements are observed.
Share