Thank you for the revised manuscript. I found most of the reviewers' comments sufficiently addressed and the manuscript as a whole reads better now. However, I have one minor suggestion: please re-think the title of your paper to reflect more its content. In particular, the word "reasonable" is a kind of geoscientific jargon (maybe "plausible" instead). You don't need to add: "methodology and application case". I tried to combine what you wrote in the Introduction into something like: "Non-deterministic lithological interpretation (or classification) of geophysical inversion results honoring geological principles".

Thank you for considering changes to the title & congratulation on your paper!

Dear authors,

I am happy to let you know that your manuscript is accepted for publication in Solid Earth. Many thanks for submitting your work with us.

With best wishes,
Susanne Buiter