76 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Photonic Seismology: A New Decade of Distributed Acoustic Sensing in Geophysics from 2012 to 2023 F. Cheng https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-024-09840-0
2. Seismic Noise Recorded by Telecommunication Fiber Optics Reveals the Impact of COVID-19 Measures on Human Activity J. Shen & T. Zhu https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210008
3. Directional sensitivity of fibre optic cables for surface seismic reflection distributed acoustic sensing: a review and potential solutions for enhanced sensitivity B. Adeniyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-00972-0
4. Urban DAS Data Processing and Its Preliminary Application to City Traffic Monitoring H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249976
5. Seismic monitoring using the telecom fiber network S. Donadello et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01338-2
6. The seismic wavefield as seen by distributed acoustic sensing arrays: local, regional and teleseismic sources B. Kennett https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0812
7. Deep Learning–Based Footfall Detection and Anthropogenic Activity Characterization Using Fiber-Optic Distributed Acoustic Sensing Y. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250120
8. A Continuous DAS Dataset of the 2 April 2024 Mw 7.4 Hualien, Taiwan, Earthquake Sequence from the MiDAS Observatory C. Ku et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220260166
9. Measurement of Surface-Wave Phase-Velocity Dispersion on Mixed Inertial Seismometer – Distributed Acoustic Sensing Seismic Noise Cross-Correlations A. Nayak & J. Ajo-Franklin https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210028
10. Modelling uncertainty in P-wave arrival-times retrieved from DAS data: case-studies from 15 fibre optic cables E. Bozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae364
11. Urban sensing using existing fiber-optic networks J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57997-y
12. Characterisation of the optical response to seismic waves of submarine telecommunications cables with distributed and integrated fibre-optic sensing D. Fairweather et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83107-x
13. A Review of Nanostructure Coating Techniques to Achieve High-Precision Optical Fiber Sensing Applications S. Kok et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/nanomanufacturing4040015
14. Acoustic Events Detection and Classification for Urban DAS Data with Supervised Learning Y. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240222
15. Seismic monitoring and site responses of the 2025 Ms 6.8 Dingri earthquake using distributed acoustic sensing J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.10.008
16. Technological evolution from conventional point sensors to distributed acoustic sensing (DAS): a comparative review I. Mustapha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-026-01141-7
17. Near real-time channel selection for Distributed Acoustic Sensing technology E. Bozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i1.2251
18. DASPy: A Python Toolbox for DAS Seismology M. Hu & Z. Li https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240124
19. Characterising sediment thickness beneath a Greenlandic outlet glacier using distributed acoustic sensing: preliminary observations and progress towards an efficient machine learning approach A. Booth et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.15
20. A review of seismic detection using fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing: from telecommunication cables to earthquake sensors B. Taha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07370-5
21. Long-term ambient seismic interferometry for constraining seasonal subsurface velocity variations in urban settings: a distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) case study J. Yang & J. Shragge https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad181
22. MAEPD: A Foundation Model for Distributed Acoustic Sensing Signal Recognition via Masked Autoencoder Pre-Training and Adapter-Based Prompt Tuning K. Gui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072057
23. Long Range Raman-Amplified Distributed Acoustic Sensor Based on Spontaneous Brillouin Scattering for Large Strain Sensing S. Bakhtiari Gorajoobi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22052047
24. Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Crowd Motion and Firecracker Explosions in the Fireworks Show J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230346
25. Comparison of Earthquake Wavefield Measurements from DAS and a Broadband Seismic Array in an Urban Setting J. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250229
26. Urban Seismic Networks: A Worldwide Review S. Scudero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413165
27. Fiber-Optic Sensing for Earthquake Hazards Research, Monitoring, and Early Warning J. McGuire et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250067
28. Subsurface Imaging Using Interferometry of Distributed Acoustic Sensing Ambient Noise Measurement along a Dark Fiber Line: A Case Study in Downtown Reno, Nevada M. Mirzanejad et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230136
29. Rapid Surface Deployment of a DAS System for Earthquake Hazard Assessment J. Mjehovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10896
30. Detecting gas pipeline leaks in sandy soil with fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105367
31. Detection of aircraft noise using distributed acoustic sensing with a buried telecommunication cable B. Gurevich et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44384-025-00007-8
32. Urban Monitoring Using Preexisting Telecommunication Fiber-Optic Networks for Distributed Acoustic Sensing: A Review J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2025.3610429
33. Seismic Observations of Four Thunderstorms Using an Underground Fiber-Optic Array S. Hone & T. Zhu https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200264
34. Spatiotemporal evaluation of Rayleigh surface wave estimated from roadside dark fiber DAS array and traffic noise R. Czarny et al. https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i2.247
35. Traffic Monitoring Using Optical Fiber Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Metropolitan Environments Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2025.3642924
36. Seismic monitoring of rockfalls using distributed acoustic sensing T. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107285
37. Impact of Lossy Compression Errors on Passive Seismic Data Analyses A. Issah & E. Martin https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230314
38. From Coherent Systems Technology to Advanced Fiber Sensing for Smart Network Monitoring C. Dorize et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2022.3221552
39. Turning a Telecom Fiber-Optic Cable into an Ultradense Seismic Array for Rapid Postearthquake Response in an Urban Area X. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210183
40. Mechanisms of sand production, prediction–a review and the potential for fiber optic technology and machine learning in monitoring D. Asfha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01860-1
41. ADE-Net: A Deep Neural Network for DAS Earthquake Detection Trained With a Limited Number of Positive Samples H. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2022.3143120
42. Deep Deconvolution for Traffic Analysis With Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data M. van den Ende et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.3223084
43. Imaging Earth’s subsurface with thunderstorm-generated seismic waves N. Roth et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aeg8096
44. Noise Levels and Signals Observed on Submarine Fibers in the Canary Islands Using DAS A. Ugalde et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210049
45. DAS with telecommunication fibre-optic cable in urban areas can record storm-induced seismic noise J. Shen & T. Zhu https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad352
46. Distributed Acoustic Sensing Based on Microtremor Survey Method for Near-Surface Active Faults Exploration: A Case Study in Datong Basin, China A. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042915
47. Design and Building of a Cost-Effective Six-Component Optical Borehole Strainmeter M. Foin et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2025.3546369
48. Distributed acoustic sensing for near-surface imaging using submarine telecommunication cable: A case study in the Trondheimsfjord, Norway K. Taweesintananon et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0834.1
49. The Imperial Valley Dark Fiber Project: Toward Seismic Studies Using DAS and Telecom Infrastructure for Geothermal Applications J. Ajo-Franklin et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220072
50. Surrounding ambient features analysis of existing communication optical cable by using DAS Big-Data Y. Zhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.110772
51. Scientific Applications of Distributed Acoustic Sensing: State-of-the-Art Review and Perspective B. Gorshkov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031033
52. Common bias-digital subcarrier multiplexing scheme for integrated sensing and communication in short-reach optical transmission systems J. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.565431
53. Real-Time Classification of Anthropogenic Seismic Sources from Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data: Application for Pipeline Monitoring C. Huynh et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220078
54. Real options of distributed DAS sensing applied to road transport engineering I. Urquijo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.091
55. Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024671
56. Urban Running Activity Detected Using a Seismic Sensor during COVID-19 Pandemic Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210147
57. Earthquake location based on Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) as a seismic array K. Lentas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107109
58. Research Advances on Distributed Acoustic Sensing Technology for Seismology A. Rashid et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030196
59. Offshore subsurface characterization enabled by fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS): An East China Sea 3D VSP survey example Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1033456
60. DAS scaling relations for S-waves in Mexico City: From peak ground motion to spectral amplitude and acceleration assessment M. Aguilar-Velázquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110126
61. Feasibility Study of Anisotropic Full-Waveform Inversion with DAS Data in a Vertical Seismic Profile Configuration at the Newell County Facility, Alberta, Canada L. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-024-09836-w
62. Real-time campus resilience monitoring with distributed acoustic sensing: A case study H. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-025-3030-7
63. Constraining water dynamics through unsaturated and saturated zones using fiber-optic seismic sensing data J. Shen & T. Zhu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119507
64. Can DAS be used to monitor mining induced seismicity? H. du Toit et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105127
65. High-precision rockfall source localization in acoustically complex environments using distributed acoustic sensing F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02807-9
66. Deploying the First Regional DAS Seismic Network in a High-Hazard European Region: The Case of Northeastern Italy G. Chiappetta et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220260094
67. Evaluating seismic beamforming capabilities of distributed acoustic sensing arrays M. van den Ende & J. Ampuero https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-915-2021
68. An efficient deep learning method for VSP wavefield separation: A DAS-VSP case X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0062.1
69. Application of Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Active Near-Surface Seismic Monitoring E. Roshdy et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051558
70. A real scale application of a novel set of spatial and similarity features for detection and classification of natural seismic sources from distributed acoustic sensing data C. Huynh et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae382
71. Integrated sensing and communication in an optical fibre H. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-01067-1
72. Assessing the Expansion of Ground-Motion Sensing Capability in Smart Cities via Internet Fiber-Optic Infrastructure S. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240049
73. High‐Resolution Near‐Surface Imaging at the Basin Scale Using Dark Fiber and Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Toward Site Effect Estimation in Urban Environments F. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB026957
74. Wavefield Modeling and Analysis of Lightning Quakes Measured by a Distributed Acoustic Sensing Array N. Roth et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230116
75. Characterizing Microearthquakes Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing With Hybrid Borehole DAS and Three-Component Geophone Data Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3264931
76. Site characterization with direct full-waveform inversion of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) strain data H. Van Tran & K. Tran https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2026.106468