142 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Hydromechanical dynamics of hydraulic and natural fractures J. Synn & C. Park https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2018.55.4.340
2. Revisiting Piezoelectric Sensor Calibration Methods Using Elastodynamic Body Waves R. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00799-1
3. Thermally driven fracture aperture variation in naturally fractured granites M. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-019-0140-9
4. Field test of a Combined Thermo-Mechanical Drilling technology. Mode I: Thermal spallation drilling E. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107005
5. Estimates of Individual Fracture Compliances Along Boreholes From Full‐Waveform Sonic Log Data N. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022015
6. Spatiotemporal changes in seismic velocity associated with hydraulic fracturing-induced earthquakes near Fox Creek, Alberta, Canada A. Ojo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109390
7. On the direct measurement of shear moduli in transversely isotropic rocks using the uniaxial compression test M. Dambly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.10.025
8. Tracking Fluid Flow in Shallow Crustal Fault Zones: 2. Insights From Cross‐Hole Forced Flow Experiments in Damage Zones B. Brixel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB019108
9. The frequency-size scaling of non-volcanic tremors beneath the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield: Possible implications for seismic energy release N. Staudenmaier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.006
10. The influence of thermal treatment on rock–bit interaction: a study of a combined thermo–mechanical drilling (CTMD) concept E. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-020-00171-y
11. Comparison and application of non-conforming mesh models for flow in fractured porous media using dual Lagrange multipliers P. Zulian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110773
12. New insights on the fault structure of Bedretto geothermal testbed and the associated seismicity based on active seismic crosshole tomography M. Schwarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-347-2026
13. Impact of injection rate ramp-up on nucleation and arrest of dynamic fault slip F. Ciardo & A. Rinaldi https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-021-00336-4
14. Hydraulic stimulation and fluid circulation experiments in underground laboratories: Stepping up the scale towards engineered geothermal systems V. Gischig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2019.100175
15. Joint inversion of seismic and geoelectrical data targeting geological faults M. Arboleda-Zapata et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag361
16. In situ observation of helium and argon release during fluid-pressure-triggered rock deformation C. Roques et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63458-x
17. Investigating the Role of Fluids in the Source Parameters of the 2013–2014 Mw 5 Matese Seismic Sequence, Southern Italy G. Calderoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230046
18. Damage zone characterization using fracture patterns and stress fields: a novel study at the Grimsel Test Site, Swiss Alps S. Türkdoğan & P. Bruna https://doi.org/10.1144/geoenergy2025-055
19. A methodology to determine the elastic properties of anisotropic rocks from a single uniaxial compression test M. Nejati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.04.004
20. On the anisotropy of shear fracture toughness in rocks M. Nejati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102946
21. On the initiation of hydraulic fractures in anisotropic rocks M. Sakha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105429
22. Verification of Coupled Hydraulic Fracturing Simulators Using Laboratory-Scale Experiments P. Deb et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02425-y
23. Numerical modeling of hydraulic stimulation of fractured crystalline rock at the bedretto underground laboratory for geosciences and geoenergies I. Vaezi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105689
24. Numerical modeling of hydro-mechanical processes during hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures at the Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland J. Ouf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2024.100608
25. Four-dimensional tracer flow reconstruction in fractured rock through borehole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) monitoring P. Giertzuch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1497-2021
26. Computing Localized Breakthrough Curves and Velocities of Saline Tracer from Ground Penetrating Radar Monitoring Experiments in Fractured Rock P. Giertzuch et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102949
27. Hydraulic Modeling of Induced and Propagated Fractures: Analysis of Flow and Pressure Data From Hydromechanical Experiments in the COSC‐1 Deep Borehole in Crystalline Rock Near Åre, Sweden F. Basirat et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029484
28. Insights from Subsurface Monitoring for Engineering of the Stimulation Pattern in Fractured Reservoirs N. Gholizadeh Doonechaly et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04525-5
29. Applications and future developments of the (thermo-) poro-elastic theory in geophysics M. Nespoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104996
30. Techno-economic analysis of Advanced Geothermal Systems (AGS) A. Malek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.012
31. The EGS Collab project: Outcomes and lessons learned from hydraulic fracture stimulations in crystalline rock at 1.25 and 1.5 km depth T. Kneafsey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103178
32. Laboratory investigation of hydraulic fracturing in granitic rocks using active and passive seismic monitoring A. Butt et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad162
33. Application of Waveform Stacking Methods for Seismic Location at Multiple Scales L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184729
34. Laboratory hydraulic stimulation experiments to investigate the interaction between newly formed and preexisting fractures A. Abe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104665
35. Slip Activation Potential of Fractures in the Crystalline Basement Rocks of Kuujjuaq (Nunavik, Canada) to Assess Enhanced Geothermal Systems Development M. Miranda et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13110340
36. Characterizing a decametre-scale granitic reservoir using ground-penetrating radar and seismic methods J. Doetsch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1441-2020
37. Modeling supercritical CO2 injection induced rupture of a minor fault embedded in a poroelastic layered reservoir-caprock system M. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2025.106185
38. Multi-scale hydraulic and petrophysical characterization of a heterogeneous fault zone in the Gotthard massif's crystalline basement T. Schaber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-275-2026
39. Interpreting the cause of bound earthquakes at underground injection experiments R. Schultz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-617-2026
40. Seismic Response to Injection Well Stimulation in a High‐Temperature, High‐Permeability Reservoir C. Hopp et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008243
41. Joint opening or hydroshearing? Analyzing a fracture zone stimulation at Fenton Hill A. Rinaldi & J. Rutqvist https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.08.006
42. Hydraulic fracture propagation in a heterogeneous stress field in a crystalline rock mass N. Dutler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1877-2019
43. Sensitivity of Reservoir and Operational Parameters on the Energy Extraction Performance of Combined CO2-EGR–CPG Systems J. Ezekiel et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196122
44. Mechanical and hydraulic transport properties of transverse-isotropic Gneiss deformed under deep reservoir stress and pressure conditions M. Acosta & M. Violay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104235
45. Hydromechanical processes and their influence on the stimulation effected volume: observations from a decameter-scale hydraulic stimulation project H. Krietsch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1699-2020
46. Frequency-dependent seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion in crystalline rocks: insights from the Grimsel test site N. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf188
47. Seismic swarms produced by rapid fluid injection into a low permeability laboratory fault S. Cebry & G. McLaskey https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116726
48. Modified semi-circular bend test to determine the fracture toughness of anisotropic rocks M. Nejati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.008
49. Investigating stress shadowing effects and fracture propagation patterns: Implications for enhanced geothermal reservoirs A. Abe & R. Horne https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104761
50. A Novel Equi-Dimensional Finite Element Method For Flow and Transport in Fractured Porous Media Satisfying Discrete Maximum Principle M. Favino & M. Nestola https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4166563
51. Understanding seismic anisotropy in the Rotondo granite: investigating stress as a potential source K. Behnen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-333-2025
52. Investigating fracture network creation and stimulation mechanism of EGS reservoirs A. Abe & R. Horne https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102606
53. Metre-scale stress heterogeneities and stress redistribution drive complex fracture slip and fracture growth during a hydraulic stimulation experiment L. Villiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab057
54. How to Reduce Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismicity A. Zang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1467-4
55. Impact of Temperature on the Performance of Plasma-Pulse Geo-Drilling (PPGD) M. Ezzat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03736-y
56. Observations and analyses of the first two hydraulic stimulations in the Pohang geothermal development site, South Korea S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101905
57. Transient evolution of permeability and friction in a slowly slipping fault activated by fluid pressurization F. Cappa et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30798-3
58. Creation of a Mixed‐Mode Fracture Network at Mesoscale Through Hydraulic Fracturing and Shear Stimulation M. Schoenball et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB019807
59. Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock L. Villiger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-627-2020
60. Effects of fracture intersection on the hydraulic properties of 3D crossed rough-walled fractures E. Karimzade et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.106997
61. Estimating the Least Principal Stress in a Granitic Rock Mass: Systematic Mini-Frac Tests and Elaborated Pressure Transient Analysis K. Bröker & X. Ma https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02743-1
62. CHENILLE: Coupled Behavior Understanding of Faults: from the Laboratory to the Field A. Bonnelye et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-58-177-2023
63. Review on In Situ Acoustic Emission Monitoring in the Context of Structural Health Monitoring in Mines G. Manthei & K. Plenkers https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091595
64. Improving enhanced geothermal systems performance using adaptive fracture conductivity F. Al Balushi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121206
65. Unsupervised learning from three-component accelerometer data to monitor the spatiotemporal evolution of meso-scale hydraulic fractures A. Chakravarty & S. Misra https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105046
66. A multi-phasic approach for estimating the Biot coefficient for Grimsel granite P. Selvadurai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2001-2019
67. Coupled Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical–Seismic Modeling of EGS Collab Experiment 1 J. Lu & A. Ghassemi https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020446
68. Hydromechanical characterization of a fractured crystalline rock volume during multi-stage hydraulic stimulations at the BedrettoLab K. Bröker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103126
69. Tracking Fluid Flow in Shallow Crustal Fault Zones: 1. Insights From Single‐Hole Permeability Estimates B. Brixel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018200
70. Permeability evolution during pressure-controlled shear slip in saw-cut and natural granite fractures Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2022.100027
71. Comprehensive data set of in situ hydraulic stimulation experiments for geothermal purposes at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden) A. Zang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-295-2024
72. Fracture Unclogging: A Numerical Study of Seismically Induced Viscous Shear Stresses in Fluid‐Saturated Fractured Rocks N. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017984
73. Fractal characteristics of fractures in crystalline basement rocks: Insights from depth-dependent correlation analyses to 5 km depth M. Afshari Moein et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105138
74. Velocity changes in the shallow and mid-depth subsurface induced by hydraulic fracturing at a shale play site in southwestern China H. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO-2025-0232
75. Coupling Between Fluid Pressure and Opening During Fluid Injection into a Pre-existing Fracture K. Ahmadov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-026-05599-5
76. Experimental and numerical analysis of injection-induced permeability changes in pre-existing fractures J. Ouf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2024.100576
77. Field Comparison of DNA‐Labeled Nanoparticle and Solute Tracer Transport in a Fractured Crystalline Rock A. Kittilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025021
78. Updating induced seismic hazard assessments during hydraulic stimulation experiments in underground laboratories: workflow and limitations V. Gischig et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-1153-2025
79. Experimental investigation of chemically aided fracture growth in silicified fault rocks O. Callahan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101724
80. Optimization and Practice of Deep Carbonate Gas Reservoir Acidizing Technology in the Sinian System Formation of Sichuan Basin S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082591
81. Hydromechanical insight of fracture opening and closure during in-situ hydraulic fracturing in crystalline rock N. Dutler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104450
82. Permeability Impairment and Salt Precipitation Patterns During CO2 Injection Into Single Natural Brine‐Filled Fractures M. Grimm Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027213
83. Coupled processes in fractured media: a key to the energy transition Q. Lei & C. Tsang https://doi.org/10.1007/s44421-025-00011-4
84. Characterization of the highly fractured zone at the Grimsel Test Site based on hydraulic tomography L. Ringel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6443-2022
85. Laboratory Insight Into Seismic Estimates of Energy Partitioning During Dynamic Rupture: An Observable Scaling Breakdown P. Selvadurai https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB017194
86. Relaxation damage control via fatigue-hydraulic fracturing in granitic rock as inferred from laboratory-, mine-, and field-scale experiments A. Zang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86094-5
87. Heat depletion in sedimentary basins and its effect on the design and electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems B. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.145
88. Permeability Enhancement From a Hydraulic Stimulation Imaged With Ground Penetrating Radar A. Shakas et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088783
89. Mitigation of injection-induced seismicity on undrained faults in granite using cyclic fluid injection: A laboratory study Y. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104881
90. Poroelasticity Contributes to Hydraulic‐Stimulation Induced Pressure Changes N. Dutler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091468
91. Recent developments, challenges, and future research directions in tomographic characterization of fractured aquifers L. Ringel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130709
92. Hydro-mechanical fault reactivation modeling based on elasto-plasticity with embedded weakness planes L. Urpi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.06.001
93. Modeling injection-induced fault slip using long short-term memory networks U. Mital et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.006
94. Increased Power Generation due to Exothermic Water Exsolution in CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Power Plants M. Fleming et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101865
95. On the link between fracture toughness, tensile strength, and fracture process zone in anisotropic rocks N. Dutler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.017
96. Modelling of hydro-mechanical processes in heterogeneous fracture intersections using a fictitious domain method with variational transfer operators C. von Planta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-09936-7
97. Analysis of thermal dilution experiments with distributed temperature sensing for fractured rock characterization M. Klepikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127874
98. Evaluation of possible reactivation of undetected faults during CO2 injection L. Blanco-Martín et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103794
99. Injection‐Induced Propagation and Coalescence of Preexisting Fractures in Granite Under Triaxial Stress Z. Ye & A. Ghassemi https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017400
100. Multi-Disciplinary Monitoring Networks for Mesoscale Underground Experiments: Advances in the Bedretto Reservoir Project K. Plenkers et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063315
101. Simulation of hydro-mechanically coupled processes in rough rock fractures using an immersed boundary method and variational transfer operators C. von Planta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09873-0
102. Transient hydraulic tomography approach to characterize main flowpaths and their connectivity in fractured media M. Klepikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103500
103. Activating a Natural Fault Zone in the Swiss Alps M. Meier et al. https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v5i1.2065
104. Review: Induced Seismicity During Geoenergy Development—A Hydromechanical Perspective S. Ge & M. Saar https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023141
105. Characterization of the effects of hydraulic stimulation with tracer-based temporal moment analysis and tomographic inversion A. Kittilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101820
106. Permeability and seismic velocity anisotropy across a ductile–brittle fault zone in crystalline rock Q. Wenning et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-683-2018
107. A combined thermo-mechanical drilling technology for deep geothermal and hard rock reservoirs E. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101771
108. Contact between rough rock surfaces using a dual mortar method C. von Planta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104414
109. Field-scale fault reactivation experiments by fluid injection highlight aseismic leakage in caprock analogs: Implications for CO2 sequestration Y. Guglielmi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103471
110. Multi-disciplinary characterizations of the BedrettoLab – a new underground geoscience research facility X. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-301-2022
111. Time-lapse ground penetrating radar difference reflection imaging of saline tracer flow in fractured rock P. Giertzuch et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0481.1
112. On Brazilian disk test for mixed-modeI/IIfracture toughness experiments of anisotropic rocks A. Aminzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.04.010
113. True-Triaxial Investigation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Granite and Sandstone Using Active–Passive Seismic Monitoring A. Butt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-026-05748-w
114. On the directional dependency of Mode I fracture toughness in anisotropic rocks M. Nejati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102494
115. Estimating fluid flow rates through fracture networks using combinatorial optimization A. Hobé et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.002
116. 3D non-conforming mesh model for flow in fractured porous media using Lagrange multipliers P. Schädle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.06.014
117. Selection and characterization of the target fault for fluid-induced activation and earthquake rupture experiments P. Achtziger-Zupančič et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1087-2024
118. Transmissivity Changes and Microseismicity Induced by Small‐Scale Hydraulic Fracturing Tests in Crystalline Rock M. Jalali et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076781
119. Flow-through Drying during CO2 Injection into Brine-filled Natural Fractures: A Tale of Effective Normal Stress M. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103378
120. Importance of fracture deformation throughout hydraulic testing under in situ conditions P. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab354
121. Constraining the stress field and its variability at the BedrettoLab: Elaborated hydraulic fracture trace analysis K. Bröker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105739
122. Full-waveform-based characterization of acoustic emission activity in a mine-scale experiment: a comparison of conventional and advanced hydraulic fracturing schemes P. Niemz et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa127
123. Stochastic Inversion of Three‐Dimensional Discrete Fracture Network Structure With Hydraulic Tomography L. Ringel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030401
124. Inertial flow-induced fluid pressurization enhances the reactivation of rate-and-state faults Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106650
125. On the applicability of connectivity metrics to rough fractures under normal stress H. Javanmard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104122
126. Estimation of Fracture Compliance From Attenuation and Velocity Analysis of Full‐Waveform Sonic Log Data N. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016507
127. Insights Into Hydraulic Fracture Growth Gained From a Joint Analysis of Seismometer‐Derived Tilt Signals and Acoustic Emissions P. Niemz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023057
128. How Equivalent Are Equivalent Porous Media? A. Zareidarmiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089163
129. Mode I fracture growth in anisotropic rocks: Theory and experiment M. Nejati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.03.004
130. Techno-Economic Assessment of Geothermal Resources in the Variscan Basement of the Northern Upper Rhine Graben M. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-022-10138-4
131. Numerical Modeling of the Effects of Pore Characteristics on the Electric Breakdown of Rock for Plasma Pulse Geo Drilling M. Ezzat et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010250
132. The rock breaking mechanism of a combined high-voltage electric impulse-PDC bit drilling technology W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102723
133. On the Variability of Pressure Propagation During Hydraulic Stimulation Based on Seismic Velocity Observations F. Schopper et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018801
134. The potential of coupled carbon storage and geothermal extraction in a CO2-enhanced geothermal system: a review Y. Wu & P. Li https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-020-00173-w
135. Understanding post-injection seismicity: Causes and mechanisms of trailing earthquakes in Enhanced Geothermal Systems A. Boyet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116055
136. Seismic monitoring of the STIMTEC hydraulic stimulation experiment in anisotropic metamorphic gneiss C. Boese et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-323-2022
137. Stress Measurements for an In Situ Stimulation Experiment in Crystalline Rock: Integration of Induced Seismicity, Stress Relief and Hydraulic Methods H. Krietsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1597-8
138. Special Issue “Hydraulic Fracturing in Hard Rock” A. Zang & O. Stephansson https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-1740-1
139. Numerical evaluation of hot dry rock reservoir through stimulation and heat extraction using a three-dimensional anisotropic coupled THM model J. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101729
140. On the validation of mixed-mode I/II crack growth theories for anisotropic rocks M. Sakha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111484
141. Solute tracer test quantification of the effects of hot water injection into hydraulically stimulated crystalline rock A. Kittilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-020-00172-x
142. Conservation properties of non-conforming embedded finite-element methods based on lagrange multipliers M. Nestola et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-025-01075-8