Solid Earth
Solid Earth
SE
Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-777-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-777-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
Research article
 | 
15 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2018

The glacial isostatic adjustment signal at present day in northern Europe and the British Isles estimated from geodetic observations and geophysical models

Karen M. Simon, Riccardo E. M. Riva, Marcel Kleinherenbrink, and Thomas Frederikse

Viewed

Total article views: 5,978 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,078 1,691 209 5,978 243 287
  • HTML: 4,078
  • PDF: 1,691
  • XML: 209
  • Total: 5,978
  • BibTeX: 243
  • EndNote: 287
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,978 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,415 with geography defined and 563 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
This study constrains the post-glacial rebound signal in Scandinavia and northern Europe via the combined inversion of prior forward model information with GPS-measured vertical land motion data and GRACE gravity data. The best-fit model for vertical motion rates has a χ2 value of ~ 1 and a maximum uncertainty of 0.3–0.4 mm yr−1. An advantage of inverse models relative to forward models is their ability to estimate formal uncertainties associated with the post-glacial rebound process.
Read more
Share