Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-7-2151-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-7-2151-2015

  06 Aug 2015

06 Aug 2015

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal SE. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Dynamic evaluation of ecosystem service value of the riparian zone based on remote sensing from 1986 to 2012

B. L. Fu1,2, Y. Li1, B. Zhang1, B. S. Yin3, H. L. Zhu1,2, and Z. F. Xing1,2 B. L. Fu et al.
  • 1Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4888 Shengbei Street, Changchun, Jilin 130102, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Tangshan Normal University, 156 Jianshe Street, Tangshan 063000, China

Abstract. In this paper, we calculated comparable and dynamic ecosystem service value per unit area in the riparian zone of Second Songhua River; then we also estimated changes in the value of ecosystem services resulting from land use changes; finally, we continuously evaluated the riparian ecosystem service value based on 520 basic evaluation units (BEUs) and explored the trend of the riparian ecosystem service value from 1986 to 2012. The results indicated that comparable economic values of per unit area food production of farmland ecosystems in 2012 almost increased three times more than that in 1986 from 154.83 to 382.45 $ ha−1; the people's willingness to pay for farmland ecosystem services increased from 0.24 in 1986 to 0.48 in 2012; the land areas supporting the environment and society generally declined, whereas areas of farmland significantly increased from 1986 to 2012; the riparian total ecosystem service value increased from 42.30 million $ in 1986 to 119.67 million $ in 2012, with an average increase rate of 4.06 % yr−1; the ecosystem service value of four reaches all have seen a sharp increase from 1986 to 2012; the average ecosystem service value of a reach was the smallest one in the four reaches, and the value of c and d reach was significantly more than other two reaches.

B. L. Fu et al.

 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

B. L. Fu et al.

B. L. Fu et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 678 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
422 221 35 678 28 39
  • HTML: 422
  • PDF: 221
  • XML: 35
  • Total: 678
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Aug 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Aug 2015)

Cited

Latest update: 15 Jun 2021