Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed underthe Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Control of crustal strength, tectonic inheritance, and stretching/ shortening rates on crustal deformation and basin reactivation: insights from laboratory models
- Final revised paper (published on 02 Sep 2022)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 25 Mar 2022)
- Supplement to the preprint
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor |
: Report abuse
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Nemanja Krstekanic, 22 Apr 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Benjamin Guillaume, 06 Jun 2022
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Marco Bonini, 24 Apr 2022
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Benjamin Guillaume, 06 Jun 2022
- EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Ernst Willingshofer, 08 Jun 2022
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Benjamin Guillaume on behalf of the Authors (05 Jul 2022)  Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (07 Jul 2022) by Ernst Willingshofer
AR by Benjamin Guillaume on behalf of the Authors (08 Jul 2022)  Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Jul 2022) by Ernst Willingshofer
ED: Publish as is (12 Jul 2022) by Susanne Buiter(Executive Editor)
In this manuscript, the authors use crustal-scale analogue modelling to study a complex tectonic system in which indentation-driven and extrusion-driven deformation overlap in space and time and result in different coeval tectonic regimes. The topic of this research is very welcome as there is still a lack of knowledge on various controlling factors of such processes’ interplay. The manuscript is well structured and written, scientifically very valid, with a clear description of the methodology, results, interpretations and conclusions. The title is informative and reflects the content of the manuscript, while the language is good. Taking all of that into account, I consider it a nice contribution to Solid Earth.
I have a few moderate to minor comments that I’ll point out below. Also in the attached annotated pdf of the manuscript, I have smaller comments that I hope will help the authors clarify a few minor things in the text.
I’m looking forward to these small corrections and the publication of this manuscript.