Articles | Volume 16, issue 4/5
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-297-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-297-2025
Research article
 | 
14 May 2025
Research article |  | 14 May 2025

On the global geodynamic consequences of different phase boundary morphologies

Gwynfor T. Morgan, J. Huw Davies, Robert Myhill, and James Panton

Related authors

Reconciling surface deflections from simulations of global mantle convection
Conor P. B. O'Malley, Gareth G. Roberts, James Panton, Fred D. Richards, J. Huw Davies, Victoria M. Fernandes, and Sia Ghelichkhan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 9023–9049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-9023-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-9023-2024, 2024
Short summary
How a volcanic arc influences back-arc extension: insight from 2D numerical models
Duo Zhang and J. Huw Davies
Solid Earth, 15, 1113–1132, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1113-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1113-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Baumgardner, J. R.: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model for Mantle Convection, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1983. a, b
Bina, C. R. and Helffrich, G.: Geophysical Constraints on Mantle Composition, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd edn., vol. 3, 41–65, Elsevier Inc., https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00202-3, 2013. a
Bina, C. R. and Liu, M.: A note on the sensitivity of mantle convection models to composition-dependent phase relations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2565–2568, https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL02546, 1995. a
Birch, F.: Elasticity and constitution of the Earth's interior, J. Geophys. Res. (1896–1977), 57, 227–286, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ057i002p00227, 1952. a
Bunge, H. P., Richards, M. A., and Baumgardner, J. R.: A sensitivity study of three-dimensional spherical mantle convection at 108 Rayleigh number: Effects of depth-dependent viscosity, heating mode, and an endothermic phase change, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 11991–12007, https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03806, 1997. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
Phase transitions can influence mantle convection, inhibiting or promoting vertical flow. We are motivated by two examples: the post-spinel reaction proceeding via akimotoite at cool temperatures and a curving post-garnet boundary. Some have suggested these could change mantle dynamics. We find this is unlikely for both reactions: the first due to the uniqueness of thermodynamic state and the second due to the low magnitude of the boundary’s  slope in pressure–temperature space and density change.
Share