Articles | Volume 16, issue 4/5
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-297-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-297-2025
Research article
 | 
14 May 2025
Research article |  | 14 May 2025

On the global geodynamic consequences of different phase boundary morphologies

Gwynfor T. Morgan, J. Huw Davies, Robert Myhill, and James Panton

Viewed

Total article views: 424 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
320 85 19 424 12 13
  • HTML: 320
  • PDF: 85
  • XML: 19
  • Total: 424
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 424 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 419 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
Phase transitions can influence mantle convection, inhibiting or promoting vertical flow. We are motivated by two examples: the post-spinel reaction proceeding via akimotoite at cool temperatures and a curving post-garnet boundary. Some have suggested these could change mantle dynamics. We find this is unlikely for both reactions: the first due to the uniqueness of thermodynamic state and the second due to the low magnitude of the boundary’s  slope in pressure–temperature space and density change.
Share