Articles | Volume 16, issue 4/5
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-297-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-297-2025
Research article
 | 
14 May 2025
Research article |  | 14 May 2025

On the global geodynamic consequences of different phase boundary morphologies

Gwynfor T. Morgan, J. Huw Davies, Robert Myhill, and James Panton

Viewed

Total article views: 3,701 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,486 1,076 139 3,701 98 203
  • HTML: 2,486
  • PDF: 1,076
  • XML: 139
  • Total: 3,701
  • BibTeX: 98
  • EndNote: 203
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,701 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,646 with geography defined and 55 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 24 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Phase transitions can influence mantle convection, inhibiting or promoting vertical flow. We are motivated by two examples: the post-spinel reaction proceeding via akimotoite at cool temperatures and a curving post-garnet boundary. Some have suggested these could change mantle dynamics. We find this is unlikely for both reactions: the first due to the uniqueness of thermodynamic state and the second due to the low magnitude of the boundary’s  slope in pressure–temperature space and density change.
Share