Brezzi, F., Douglas, J., and Marini, L. D.: Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems, Numer Math., 47, 217–235,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01389710, 1985.
a
Chertova, M., Spakman, W., Geenen, T., van den Berg, A., and van Hinsbergen, D.: Underpinning tectonic reconstructions of the western Mediterranean region with dynamic slab evolution from 3-D numerical modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 5876–5902,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011150, 2014.
a
Chilton, L. and Suri, M.: On the construction of stable curvilinear p version elements for mixed formulations of elasticity and Stokes flow, Numer Math., 86, 29–48,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110000144, 2000.
a
Clevenger, T., Heister, T., Kanschat, G., and Kronbichler, M.: A flexible, parallel, adaptive geometric multigrid method for FEM, ACM T. Math. Software, 47, 1–27,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3425193, 2020.
a
Clevenger, T. C. and Heister, T.: Comparison Between Algebraic and Matrix-free Geometric Multigrid for a Stokes Problem on Adaptive Meshes with Variable Viscosity, Numer. Linear Algebr., e2375,
https://doi.org/10.1002/nla.2375, 2021.
a
Cuffaro, M., Miglio, E., Penati, M., and Viganò, M.: Mantle thermal structure at northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge from improved numerical methods and boundary conditions, Geophys. J. Int., 220, 1128–1148,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz488, 2020.
a
Dabrowski, M., Krotkiewski, M., and Schmid, D.: MILAMIN: Matlab based finite element solver for large problems, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, Q04030,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001719, 2008.
a,
b,
c
Davies, D., Wilson, C., and Kramer, S.: Fluidity: A fully unstructured anisotropic adaptive mesh computational modeling framework for geodynamics, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q06001,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003551, 2011.
a,
b
de Montserrat, A., Morgan, J. P., and Hasenclever, J.: LaCoDe: a Lagrangian two-dimensional thermo-mechanical code for large-strain compressible visco-elastic geodynamical modeling, Tectonophysics, 767, 228173,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228173, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Deubelbeiss, Y. and Kaus, B.: Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian numerical techniques for the Stokes equations in the presence of strongly varying viscosity, Phys. Earth. Planet. In., 171, 92–111,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.023, 2008.
a,
b
Douglas Jr, J., Santos, J. E., Sheen, D., and Ye, X.: Nonconforming Galerkin methods based on quadrilateral elements for second order elliptic problems, ESAIM-Math. Model. Num., 33, 747–770,
https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an:1999161, 1999.
a
Duretz, T., May, D., Gerya, T., and Tackley, P.: Discretization errors and free surface stabilisation in the finite difference and marker-in-cell method for applied geodynamics: A numerical study, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q07004,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003567, 2011.
a,
b,
c
Eichel, H., Tobiska, L., and Xie, H.: Supercloseness and superconvergence of stabilized low-order finite element discretizations of the Stokes Problem, Math. Comput., 80, 697–697,
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-2010-02404-4, 2011.
a
Gerya, T.: Numerical Geodynamic Modelling, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-107-14314-2, 2019.
a,
b,
c
Gerya, T., May, D., and Duretz, T.: An adaptive staggered grid finite difference method for modeling geodynamic Stokes flows with strongly variable viscosity, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 14, 1200–1225,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20078, 2013.
a,
b
Gresho, P. and Sani, R.: Incompressible flow and the Finite Element Method, vol II – Isothermal Laminar Flow, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, ISBN 978-0471492504, 2000.
a,
b,
c
Heister, T., Dannberg, J., Gassmöller, R., and Bangerth, W.: High Accuracy Mantle Convection Simulation through Modern Numerical Methods. II: Realistic Models and Problems, Geophys. J. Int., 210, 833–851,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx195, 2017.
a
Ilangovan, P., D'Ascoli, E., Kohl, N., and Mohr, M.: Numerical Studies on Coupled Stokes-Transport Systems for Mantle Convection, in: International Conference on Computational Science, 24th International Conference, 2–4 July 2024, Malaga, Spain,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63759-9_33, pp. 288–302, 2024.
a
John, V.: Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems, Springer,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45750-5, 2016.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Jones, T. D., Sime, N., and van Keken, P.: Burying Earth's primitive mantle in the slab graveyard, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 22, e2020GC009396,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GC009396, 2021.
a
Kronbichler, M. and Kormann, K.: Fast matrix-free evaluation of discontinuous Galerkin finite element operators, ACM T. Math. Software, 45, 29/1–40,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3325864, 2019.
a
Kronbichler, M., Heister, T., and Bangerth, W.: High accuracy mantle convection simulation through modern numerical methods, Geophys. J. Int., 191, 12–29,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05609.x, 2012.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
May, D., Brown, J., and Le Pourhiet, L.: A scalable, matrix-free multigrid preconditioner for finite element discretizations of heterogeneous Stokes flow, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 290, 496–523,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.014, 2015.
a,
b
Mishin, Y., Vasilyev, O., and Gerya, T.: A Wavelet-Based Adaptive Finite Element Method for the Stokes Problems, Fluids, 7, 221,
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7070221, 2022.
a
Munch, P., Heister, T., Prieto Saavedra, L., and Kronbichler, M.: Efficient Distributed Matrix-free Multigrid Methods on Locally Refined Meshes for FEM Computations, ACM Trans. Parallel Comput., 10, 1–38,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3580314, 2023.
a
Paczkowski, K., Montési, L. G., Long, M. D., and Thissen, C. J.: Three-dimensional flow in the subslab mantle, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 15, 3989–4008,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005441, 2014.
a
Pelletier, D., Fortin, A., and Camarero, R.: Are FEM solutions of incompressible flows really incompressible ? (Or how simple flows can cause headaches!), Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 9, 99–112,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650090108, 1989.
a
Reddy, J. and Gartling, D.: The Finite Element Method in Heat Transfer and Fluid Dynamics, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-4200-8598-3, 2010. a
Schneider, T., Hu, Y., Gao, X., Dumas, J., Zorin, D., and Panozzo, D.: A Large-Scale Comparison of Tetrahedral and Hexahedral Elements for Solving Elliptic PDEs with the Finite Element Method, ACM T. Graphic., 41, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3508372, 2022.
a
Schuh-Senlis, M., Thieulot, C., Cupillard, P., and Caumon, G.: Towards the application of Stokes flow equations to structural restoration simulations, Solid Earth, 11, 1909–1930,
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1909-2020, 2020.
a
Shewchuk, J.: Triangle: Engineering a 2D Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator, in: Applied Computational Geometry: Towards Geometric Engineering, edited by: Lin, M. C. and Manocha, D., vol. 1148 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0014497, pp. 203–222, from the First ACM Workshop on Applied Computational Geometry, 1996.
a
Suckale, J., Nave, J.-C., and Hager, B.: It takes three to tango: 1. Simulating buoyancy-driven flow in the presence of large viscosity contrasts, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, B07409,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006916, 2010.
a
Terrel, A. R., Scott, L. R., Knepley, M. G., Kirby, R. C., and Wells, G. N.: Finite elements for incompressible fluids, in: Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method: The FEniCS Book, vol. 84, edited by: Logg, A., Mardal, K.-A., and Wells, G., Springer,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8_20, pp. 385–397, 2012.
a
Thielmann, M., May, D., and Kaus, B.: Discretization errors in the Hybrid Finite Element Particle-In-Cell Method, Pure Appl. Geophys., 171, 2164–2184,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0808-9, 2014.
a,
b
Thieulot, C. and Bangerth, W.: On the choice of finite element for applications in geodynamics, Solid Earth, 13, 229–249,
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-229-2022, 2022.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l,
m,
n,
o,
p,
q,
r,
s
Tommasi, A., Knoll, M., Vauchez, A., Signorelli, J. W., Thoraval, C., and Logé, R.: Structural reactivation in plate tectonics controlled by olivine crystal anisotropy, Nat. Geosci., 2, 423–427,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo528, 2009.
a,
b
Wilson, C., Spiegelman, M., and van Keken, P.: TerraFERMA: The Transparent Finite Element Rapid Model Assembler for multiphysics problems in Earth sciences, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 18, 769–810,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006702, 2017.
a
Zlotnik, S., Diez, P., Fernandez, M., and Verges, J.: Numerical modelling of tectonic plates subduction using X-FEM, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 196, 4283–4293,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.04.006, 2007.
a
