Dear Lucia,

I've now had time to read through your responses to the comments of the reviewers, and your revised manuscript. Your efforts are commendable. I'd be pleased to accept your manuscript after the following minor comments have been suitably addressed.

Thanks for submitting your work to Solid Earth. We hope you consider us for future submissions.

Mike Heap (Topical Editor of Solid Earth)

Line 26: I suggest that you change “lightest” to “least dense”. “Light” can also refer to colour.
Line 34: “led”.
Line 70: “…the spatial and temporal evolution of magma…”
Line 78: References should be in chronological order.
Line 108: “endogenic” rather than “intruded”?
Line 202 and elsewhere: “PdF”, no?
Line 225: “Sampling”.
Line 289: Should permeability not be mentioned in the subheading?
Line 312: You should mention that the measurements were performed at atmospheric pressure (i.e. without confining pressure). You should also mention the pore fluid you used and whether/how you checked for turbulent flow (the Forchheimer effect). Please provide more details here.
Line 315: Do not abbreviate the names of the minerals.
Line 458 and elsewhere: “Light” can also refer to colour. “Low-density” is a better descriptor, in my opinion.
Line 504: “Clusters”.
Line 506: Rephrase to avoid “picture”.
Line 524: “percent”, not “percentage”.
Lines 527 and elsewhere: Are you referring here to a percentage or percentage points? If you’re talking about percentage points, perhaps it’s best to stick with “30 vol.%”.
Line 530: This is the results section. Since you now show values of permeability, there should be at least a couple of sentences describing the data.
Line 668: Remove comma.
Line 727: “experienced”. In fact, please reword this sentence to improve clarity.
Line 806: Please reword the sentence starting “The proportion…”
Line 852 and elsewhere: Do not abbreviate the names of the minerals.
Line 853: “indicates”.
Line 889: References for the published expansion signatures?
Line 916: Remove comma.
Line 924: “and”.
Line 926: Impermeable means that fluid cannot pass. Please rephrase this sentence to use “low-permeability”.
Line 948: “pathway”.
Line 948: Do the authors mean “very low permeability” or “impermeable” here?
Line 1041: “feeds”.
Line 1044: “crystals”.
Line 1053: Should this one-sentence paragraph not be part of the previous paragraph?
Line 1217: Due to the number of changes, it’s difficult to follow the conclusions. The authors should make sure there are no typos/grammatical errors.
Figure 5: The figure still contains the Morphology G3 results. I suggest that the authors double-check all the figures and figure captions.

Dear Lucia,
Thank you for addressing my final comments. I'm pleased to announce that I have now recommended that your manuscript is accepted without further delay. Thank you for submitting your work to Solid Earth; I hope you consider us again in the future.
Thanks,
Mike Heap (Topical Editor for Solid Earth)