Thank you for your revised version. I'm happy to recommend your manuscript for publication pending two minor overhauls of your manuscript. First, I'd like you to double-check all your references. In my reading of your manuscript I found both referencing inconsistencies and mistakes, as well as missing references. Please make sure your final revised version is up to standard also in that respect. Second, I've taken my time to comment on your figures (which generally hold good quality) and the figure captions. There are many problems here that you need to address. There is missing information, figures (or figure captions) out of sequence, explanations of panels that are not there, etc... Hence, you need to do a serious final overhaul of your figures and the referencing of the figures/panels in your manuscript. I'll attach a marked-up copy of your manuscript with 42 "issues" highlighted and some additional minor spelling suggestions. Please address these issues in a letter appending your final submission.

Thank you for your revised version. I'm happy to recommend your manuscript for publication pending two minor overhauls of your manuscript. First, I'd like you to double-check all your references. In my reading of your manuscript I found both referencing inconsistencies and mistakes, as well as missing references. Please make sure your final revised version is up to standard also in that respect. Second, I've taken my time to comment on your figures (which generally hold good quality) and the figure captions. There are many problems here that you need to address. There is missing information, figures (or figure captions) out of sequence, explanations of panels that are not there, etc... Hence, you need to do a serious final overhaul of your figures and the referencing of the figures/panels in your manuscript. I'll attach a marked-up copy of your manuscript with 42 "issues" highlighted and some additional minor spelling suggestions. Please address these issues in a letter appending your final submission.