Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-367-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-367-2024
Research article
 | 
14 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 14 Mar 2024

Comparison of surface-wave techniques to estimate S- and P-wave velocity models from active seismic data

Farbod Khosro Anjom, Frank Adler, and Laura Valentina Socco

Viewed

Total article views: 998 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
671 267 60 998 41 38
  • HTML: 671
  • PDF: 267
  • XML: 60
  • Total: 998
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 998 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 977 with geography defined and 21 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Most surface-wave techniques focus on estimating the S-wave velocity (VS) model and consider the P-wave velocity (VP) model as prior information in the inversion step. Here, we show the application of three surface-wave methods to estimate both VS and VP models. We apply the methods to the data from a hard-rock site that were acquired through the irregular source–receiver recording technique. We compare the outcomes and performances of the methods in detail.