Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-1201-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-1201-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Mantle deformation patterns beneath the Central India Tectonic Zone: evidence from SK(K)S splitting measurements in the Satpura Gondwana Basin and adjacent areas
Nitarani Bishoyi
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal 462066, India
Arun Kumar Dubey
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal 462066, India
Ashwani Kant Tiwari
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal 462066, India
Cited articles
Acharya, S.: Evolutionary characters of the Gondwanic Indian crust, Indian Minerals, 51, 1–24, 1997. a
Acharyya, S.: The nature of Mesoproterozoic Central Indian Tectonic Zone with exhumed and reworked older granulites, Gondwana Res., 6, 197–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1342-937x(05)70970-9, 2003. a, b
Altamimi, Z., Métivier, L., Rebischung, P., Collilieux, X., Chanard, K., and Barnéoud, J.: ITRF2020 Plate Motion Model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl106373, 2023. a
Babuska, V. and Cara, M.: Seismic Anisotropy in the Earth, Springer Netherlands, ISBN 9789401136006, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3600-6, 1991. a
Barruol, G., Silver, P. G., and Vauchez, A.: Seismic anisotropy in the eastern United States: Deep structure of a complex continental plate, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 8329–8348, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03800, 1997. a
Barruol, G., Sigloch, K., Scholz, J.-R., Mazzullo, A., Stutzmann, E., Montagner, J.-P., Kiselev, S., Fontaine, F. R., Michon, L., Deplus, C., and Dyment, J.: Large-scale flow of Indian Ocean asthenosphere driven by Réunion plume, Nat. Geosci., 12, 1043–1049, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0479-3, 2019. a
Bhandari, A., Chandra Pant, N., Bhowmik, S. K., and Goswami, S.: 1.6 Ga ultrahigh-temperature granulite metamorphism in the Central Indian Tectonic Zone: insights from metamorphic reaction history, geothermobarometry and monazite chemical ages, Geol. J., 46, 198–216, https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.1221, 2011. a
Bhowmik, S. K., Wilde, S. A., Bhandari, A., Pal, T., and Pant, N. C.: Growth of the Greater Indian Landmass and its assembly in Rodinia: geochronological evidence from the Central Indian Tectonic Zone, Gondwana Res., 22, 54–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.09.008, 2012. a
Bhukta, K., Khan, P. K., and Mandal, P.: Upper mantle anisotropy inferred from shear wave splitting beneath the Eastern Indian Shield region, Geosci. Front., 9, 1911–1920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.12.003, 2018. a
Biswal, S., Kumar, S., Roy, S. K., Kumar, M. R., Mohanty, W., Parija, M. P., and Paul, A.: Upper mantle anisotropy beneath the Western Segment, NW Indian Himalaya, using shear wave splitting, Lithosphere, 2020, 8856812, https://doi.org/10.2113/2020/8856812, 2020. a, b
Boness, N. L. and Zoback, M. D.: A multiscale study of the mechanisms controlling shear velocity anisotropy in the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth, Geophysics, 71, F131–F146, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2231107, 2006. a
Bora, S. and Kumar, S.: Geochemistry of biotites and host granitoid plutons from the Proterozoic Mahakoshal Belt, central India tectonic zone: implication for nature and tectonic setting of magmatism, Int. Geol. Rev., 57, 1686–1706, https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2015.1032372, 2015. a, b
Bormann, P., Grünthal, G., Kind, R., and Montag, H.: Upper mantle anisotropy beneath central Europe from SKS wave splitting: Effects of absolute plate motion and lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary topography?, J. Geodyn., 22, 11–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-3707(96)00014-2, 1996. a
Bowman, J. R. and Ando, M.: Shear-wave splitting in the upper-mantle wedge above the Tonga subduction zone, Geophys. J. Int., 88, 25–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1987.tb01367.x, 1987. a, b
Brownlee, S. J., Schulte‐Pelkum, V., Raju, A., Mahan, K., Condit, C., and Orlandini, O. F.: Characteristics of deep crustal seismic anisotropy from a compilation of rock elasticity tensors and their expression in receiver functions, Tectonics, 36, 1835–1857, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017tc004625, 2017. a, b, c
Chagas de Melo, B. and Assumpcão, M. a.: Mantle anisotropy and asthenospheric flow around cratons in southeastern South America, Geophys. J. Int., 215, 494–506, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy288, 2018. a
Chakraborty, C. and Ghosh, S. K.: Pull-apart origin of the Satpura Gondwana basin, central India, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 114, 259–273, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02702949, 2005. a
Chattopadhyay, A., Chatterjee, A., Das, K., and Sarkar, A.: Neoproterozoic transpression and granite magmatism in the Gavilgarh-Tan Shear Zone, central India: Tectonic significance of U-Pb zircon and U-Th-total Pb monazite ages, J. Asian Earth Sci., 147, 485–501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.08.018, 2017. a
Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Sun, C., and Badal, J.: Crustal anisotropy from Moho converted Ps wave splitting analysis and geodynamic implications beneath the eastern margin of Tibet and surrounding regions, Gondwana Res., 24, 946–957, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.04.003, 2013. a
Chenet, A.-L., Fluteau, F., Courtillot, V., Gérard, M., and Subbarao, K.: Determination of rapid Deccan eruptions across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary using paleomagnetic secular variation: Results from a 1200-m-thick section in the Mahabaleshwar escarpment, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004635, 2008. a
Cochran, E. S., Vidale, J. E., and Li, Y.: Near‐fault anisotropy following the Hector Mine earthquake, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jb002352, 2003. a
Copley, A., Mitra, S., Sloan, R. A., Gaonkar, S., and Reynolds, K.: Active faulting in apparently stable peninsular India: Rift inversion and a Holocene-age great earthquake on the Tapti Fault, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 6650–6666, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jb011294, 2014. a
Crampin, S.: Effective anisotropic elastic constants for wave propagation through cracked solids, Geophys. J. Int., 76, 135–145, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1984.tb05029.x, 1984. a, b, c
Eakin, C. M., Rychert, C. A., and Harmon, N.: The Role of Oceanic Transform Faults in Seafloor Spreading: A Global Perspective From Seismic Anisotropy, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 1736–1751, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jb015176, 2018. a
Eakin, C. M., Wirth, E. A., Wallace, A., Ulberg, C. W., Creager, K. C., and Abers, G. A.: SKS Splitting Beneath Mount St. Helens: Constraints on Subslab Mantle Entrainment, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 20, 4202–4217, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008433, 2019. a
Fouch, M. J. and Rondenay, S.: Seismic anisotropy beneath stable continental interiors, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 158, 292–320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2006.03.024, 2006. a, b, c, d
Fröhlich, Y., Grund, M., and Ritter, J. R. R.: Lateral and vertical variations of seismic anisotropy in the lithosphere–asthenosphere system underneath Central Europe from long-term splitting measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 239, 112–135, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae245, 2024. a
Gao, S. S. and Liu, K. H.: AnisDep: A FORTRAN program for the estimation of the depth of anisotropy using spatial coherency of shear-wave splitting parameters, Comput. Geosci., 49, 330–333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.020, 2012. a
Garnero, E. J. and Lay, T.: Lateral variations in lowermost mantle shear wave anisotropy beneath the north Pacific and Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102, 8121–8135, https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03830, 1997. a
Groves, D. I. and Santosh, M.: Craton and thick lithosphere margins: The sites of giant mineral deposits and mineral provinces, Gondwana Res., 100, 195–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2020.06.008, 2021. a
Hou, G., Santosh, M., Qian, X., Lister, G. S., and Li, J.: Tectonic constraints on 1.3~ 1.2 Ga final breakup of Columbia supercontinent from a giant radiating dyke swarm, Gondwana Res., 14, 561–566, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.03.005, 2008. a
Jade, S., Shrungeshwara, T., Kumar, K., Choudhury, P., Dumka, R. K., and Bhu, H.: India plate angular velocity and contemporary deformation rates from continuous GPS measurements from 1996 to 2015, Sci. Rep., 7, 11 439, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11697-w, 2017. a, b
Jana, N., Singh, A., Tiwari, A. K., Singh, C., and Biswas, R.: Mantle deformation patterns and signatures of rift, beneath Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 289, 20–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2019.01.009, 2019. a
Jana, N., Singh, A., Tiwari, A. K., Eken, T., Singh, A., Singh, C., and Shankar, U.: Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation beneath Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt using direct-S waves, Precambrian Res., 360, 106215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106215, 2021. a
Kaila, K. and Krishna, V.: Deep seismic sounding studies in India and major discoveries, Current science (Bangalore), 62, 117–154, 1992. a
Kaila, K., Murty, P., and Mall, D.: The evolution of the Vindhyan basin vis-à-vis the Narmada-Son lineament, central India, from deep seismic soundings, Tectonophysics, 162, 277–289, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(89)90249-7, 1989. a
Kanaujia, J. and Surve, G.: Upper mantle deformation beneath the northeastern part of Indian plate from shear-wave splitting analysis, Geo-Marine Lett., 44, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-023-00763-0, 2024. a
Kanaujia, J., Mitra, S., Gupta, S. C., and Sharma, M. L.: Crustal anisotropy from shear-wave splitting of local earthquakes in the Garhwal Lesser Himalaya, Geophys. J. Int., 219, 2013–2033, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz404, 2019. a
Karato, S.-I.: Seismic anisotropy due to lattice preferred orientation of minerals: Kinematic or dynamic?, p. 455–471, American Geophysical Union, ISBN 0875900666, https://doi.org/10.1029/gm039p0455, 1987. a, b, c
Kendall, J.-M. and Silver, P. G.: Constraints from seismic anisotropy on the nature of the lowermost mantle, Nature, 381, 409–412, https://doi.org/10.1038/381409a0, 1996. a
Kreemer, C.: Absolute plate motions constrained by shear wave splitting orientations with implications for hot spot motions and mantle flow, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jb006416, 2009. a
Krishnamurthy, P.: The Deccan Volcanic Province (DVP), India: a review: Part 1: Areal extent and distribution, compositional diversity, flow types and sequences, stratigraphic correlations, dyke swarms and sills, petrography and mineralogy, J. Geol. Soc. India, 96, 9–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-020-1501-5, 2020. a
Kumar, M., Singh, A., Kumar, N., and Sarkar, D.: Passive seismological imaging of the Narmada paleo-rift, central India, Precambrian Res., 270, 155–164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.09.013, 2015a. a, b, c
Kumar, M. R. and Singh, A.: Evidence for plate motion related strain in the Indian shield from shear wave splitting measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jb005128, 2008. a
Kumar, P. and Mohanty, W. K.: Evaluating the Lithospheric Structure and Regional/Residual Bouguer Anomalies in Peninsular India Through Potential Field Modeling and Thermal Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 130, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb029341, 2025. a
Kumar, P., Yuan, X., Kumar, M. R., Kind, R., Li, X., and Chadha, R.: The rapid drift of the Indian tectonic plate, Nature, 449, 894–897, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06214, 2007. a
Kumar, P., Ravi Kumar, M., Srijayanthi, G., Arora, K., Srinagesh, D., Chadha, R., and Sen, M. K.: Imaging the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary of the Indian plate using converted wave techniques, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 118, 5307–5319, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50366, 2013. a
Kumar, V. P., Prakasam, K., Rai, S., and Gupta, S.: Upper-mantle anisotropy beneath the south Indian Shield: Influenced by ancient and recent Earth processes, Lithosphere, 7, 108–116, https://doi.org/10.1130/l405.1, 2015b. a
Li, Z.-X., Bogdanova, S., Collins, A., Davidson, A., De Waele, B., Ernst, R., Fitzsimons, I., Fuck, R., Gladkochub, D., Jacobs, J., Karlstrom, K. E., Lu, S., Natapov, L. M., Pease, V., Pisarevsky, S. A., Thrane, K., and Vernikovsky, V.: Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: a synthesis, Precambrian Res., 160, 179–210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.021, 2008. a
Link, F. and Rümpker, G.: Shear‐Wave Splitting Reveals Layered‐Anisotropy Beneath the European Alps in Response to Mediterranean Subduction, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jb027192, 2023. a
Liu, K. H. and Gao, S. S.: Estimation of the Depth of Anisotropy Using Spatial Coherency of Shear-Wave Splitting Parameters, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 2153–2161, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100258, 2011. a, b
Long, M. D. and Silver, P. G.: Shear Wave Splitting and Mantle Anisotropy: Measurements, Interpretations, and New Directions, Surv. Geophys., 30, 407–461, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-009-9075-1, 2009. a, b
Mahesh, P., Catherine, J. K., Gahalaut, V. K., Kundu, B., Ambikapathy, A., Bansal, A., Premkishore, L., Narsaiah, M., Ghavri, S., Chadha, R. K., Choudhary, P., Singh, D. K., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Nagarajan, B., Bhatt, B. C., Tiwari, R. P., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Bhu, H., and Kalita, S.: Rigid Indian plate: constraints from GPS measurements, Gondwana Res., 22, 1068–1072, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.01.011, 2012. a
Mainprice, D. and Nicolas, A.: Development of shape and lattice preferred orientations: application to the seismic anisotropy of the lower crust, J. Struct. Geol., 11, 175–189, https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(89)90042-4, 1989. a, b, c
Mainprice, D., Barruol, G., and Ismaïl, W. B.: The Seismic anisotropy of the Earth’s mantle: From single crystal to polycrystal, 237–264, American Geophysical Union, ISBN 0875909752, https://doi.org/10.1029/GM117p0237, 2000. a, b, c
Mall, D., Reddy, P., and Mooney, W. D.: Collision tectonics of the Central Indian Suture zone as inferred from a deep seismic sounding study, Tectonophysics, 460, 116–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.07.010, 2008. a, b, c, d
Mandal, B., Sen, M. K., and Vijaya Rao, V.: New seismic images of the Central Indian Suture Zone and their tectonic implications, Tectonics, 32, 908–921, https://doi.org/10.1002/tect.20055, 2013. a, b, c
Maurya, S., Montagner, J., Kumar, M. R., Stutzmann, E., Kiselev, S., Burgos, G., Rao, N. P., and Srinagesh, D.: Imaging the lithospheric structure beneath the Indian continent, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 121, 7450–7468, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb012948, 2016. a
Meade, C., Silver, P. G., and Kaneshima, S.: Laboratory and seismological observations of lower mantle isotropy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1293–1296, https://doi.org/10.1029/95gl01091, 1995. a
Meissner, R., Mooney, W. D., and Artemieva, I.: Seismic anisotropy and mantle creep in young orogens, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01628.x, 2002. a, b
Morgan, W. J.: Convection plumes in the lower mantle, Nature, 230, 42–43, https://doi.org/10.1038/230042a0, 1971. a
Murty, A. S. N., Tewari, H. C., and Reddy, P. R.: 2-D Crustal Velocity Structure Along Hirapur-Mandla Profile in Central India: An Update, Pure Appl. Geophys., 161, 165–184, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-003-2429-6, 2004. a
Naganjaneyulu, K. and Santosh, M.: The Central India Tectonic Zone: a geophysical perspective on continental amalgamation along a Mesoproterozoic suture, Gondwana Res., 18, 547–564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2010.02.017, 2010. a
Paul, A., Hazarika, D., and Wadhawan, M.: Shear wave splitting and crustal anisotropy in the Eastern Ladakh-Karakoram zone, northwest Himalaya, J. Asian Earth Sci., 140, 122–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.04.010, 2017. a, b
Radhakrishna, B.: Suspect tectono-stratigraphic terrane elements in the Indian subcontinent, Geol. Soc. India, 34, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.17491/jgsi/1989/340101, 1989. a
Radhakrishna, B. and Naqvi, S.: Precambrian continental crust of India and its evolution, J. Geol., 94, 145–166, https://doi.org/10.1086/629020, 1986. a
Radhakrishna, B. and Ramakrishnan, M.: Archaean-Proterozoic boundary in India, J. Geol. Soc. India, 32, 263–278, https://doi.org/10.17491/jgsi/1988/320401, 1988. a
Rao, V. V. and Reddy, P.: A Mesoproterozoic supercontinent: evidence from the Indian shield, Gondwana Res., 5, 63–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1342-937x(05)70889-3, 2002. a
Richards, M. A., Duncan, R. A., and Courtillot, V. E.: Flood basalts and hot-spot tracks: plume heads and tails, Science, 246, 103–107, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.246.4926.103, 1989. a
Ritter, J. R. R., Frohlich, Y., Sanz Alonso, Y., and Grund, M.: Short-scale laterally varying SK(K)S shear wave splitting at BFO, Germany – implications for the determination of anisotropic structures, J. Seismol., 26, 1137–1156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-022-10112-w, 2022. a
Rogers, J. J. and Santosh, M.: Supercontinents in Earth history, Gondwana Res., 6, 357–368, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818533-9.00018-7, 2003. a
Rogers, J. J. and Santosh, M.: Tectonics and surface effects of the supercontinent Columbia, Gondwana Res., 15, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.06.008, 2009. a
Roy, A. and Prasad, M. H.: Tectonothermal events in Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) and its implications in Rodinian crustal assembly, J. Asian Earth Sci., 22, 115–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1367-9120(02)00180-3, 2003. a, b
Roy, S. K., Srinagesh, D., Saikia, D., Singh, A., and Kumar, M. R.: Seismic anisotropy beneath the eastern Dharwar craton, Lithosphere, 4, 259–268, https://doi.org/10.1130/l198.1, 2012. a, b
Roy, S. K., M., R. K., and D., S.: Upper and lower mantle anisotropy inferred from comprehensive SKS and SKKS splitting measurements from India, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 392, 192–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.012, 2014. a, b
Roy, S. K., Kumar, M. R., and Srinagesh, D.: Mantle deformation beneath India inferred from shear wave splitting, J. Geol. Soc. India, 97, 1200–1206, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1849-1, 2021. a
Roy, S. K., Kumar, M. R., Kanaujia, J., Gupta, S., Singh, B., Mandal, P., and Srinagesh, D.: Insights into the mechanisms forging seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle beneath India, Tectonophysics, 888, 230454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2024.230454, 2024. a, b, c, d
Saltzer, R. L., Gaherty, J. B., and Jordan, T. H.: How are vertical shear wave splitting measurements affected by variations in the orientation of azimuthal anisotropy with depth?, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 374–390, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00088.x, 2000. a, b
Sheth, H. C.: From Deccan to Réunion: no trace of a mantle plume, Geological Society of America, https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2388-4.477, 2005. a
Shukla, G., Mallik, J., and Mondal, P.: Dimension-scaling relationships of Pachmarhi dyke swarm and their implications on Deccan magma emplacement, Tectonophysics, 843, 229602, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229602, 2022. a, b
Silver, P. G.: SEISMIC ANISOTROPY BENEATH THE CONTINENTS: Probing the Depths of Geology, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 24, 385–432, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.385, 1996. a
Silver, P. G. and Savage, M. K.: The Interpretation of Shear-Wave Splitting Parameters In the Presence of Two Anisotropic Layers, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 949–963, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1994.tb04027.x, 1994. a
Singh, J., Chandrakala, K., Singh, A., and Mall, D.: Structure and evolution of Satpura Gondwana Basin over Central Indian Tectonic Zone: inferences from seismic and gravity data, J. Indian Geophys. Union, 19, 39–54, 2015. a
Sivaram, K., Kumar, V. P., Gupta, S., Prasad, B., and Kumar, S.: Upper mantle seismic anisotropy beneath the Deccan Volcanic Province and the adjacent Eastern Dharwar Craton in south Indian shield from shear wave splitting analysis, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 322, 106829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106829, 2022. a
Tewari, H.: A tectonic model of the Narmada region, Current Sci., 80, 873–878, 2001. a
Vinnik, L., Romanowicz, B., Le Stunff, Y., and Makeyeva, L.: Seismic anisotropy in the D” layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1657–1660, https://doi.org/10.1029/95gl01327, 1995. a, b
Vinnik, L. P., Farra, V., and Romanowicz, B.: Azimuthal anisotropy in the Earth from observations of SKS at Geoscope and NARS broadband stations, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 79, 1542–1558, 1989. a
Wessel, P., Smith, W. H., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., and Wobbe, F.: Generic mapping tools: improved version released, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 94, 409–410, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001, 2013. a
Wessel, P., Luis, J. F., Uieda, L. a., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H., and Tian, D.: The generic mapping tools version 6, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 20, 5556–5564, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515, 2019. a
Wüstefeld, A., Bokelmann, G., Zaroli, C., and Barruol, G.: SplitLab: A shear-wave splitting environment in Matlab, Comput. Geosci., 34, 515–528, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.002, 2008. a, b, c
Yang, H., Peng, H., and Hu, J.: The lithospheric structure beneath southeast Tibet revealed by P and S receiver functions, J. Asian Earth Sci., 138, 62–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.02.001, 2017. a
Zhao, G., Sun, M., Wilde, S. A., and Li, S.: A Paleo-Mesoproterozoic supercontinent: assembly, growth and breakup, Earth-Sci. Rev., 67, 91–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.02.003, 2004. a
Short summary
This study examines shear wave splitting of core-refracted seismic phases from earthquakes to determine seismic anisotropy in unexplored areas of Central India. Understanding seismic anisotropy is essential for gaining insights into past geodynamic processes and current tectonic activities in the area. Our findings show that mantle deformation is influenced by both present plate motion and prior orogenic events, such as subduction, collision, and mantle plume activity within the study region.
This study examines shear wave splitting of core-refracted seismic phases from earthquakes to...