The MS is much improved. Some minor technical problems only before it is ready for publication.
1) You need to proof read the document carefully. There are still numerous grammatical and style errors that need to be addressed. as the topical editor I don't have the capacity to do copy editing for you.
2) There is no length scale on any of the figures with maps in them. This needs to be rectified.
3) You need to mark on fig 2 and/or figure 4 and figure 6 the 15 and 50 km radius zones in which you are analysing the seismicity and mention what the zones are in the figure captions. Currently it is impossible for the reader to see how these zones relate to the deformation field or plotted seismicity. Also it is not clear how these radii relate to the physical hydrocarbon extraction zones. Figure 4 might need to be enlarged in spatial coverage to fit the 50 km radius zone? Maybe this will have to be shown on fig 2?

Dear Authors,

based on the Topical Editor's report and overall assessment of the review process, I am pleased to accept your manuscript for publication in Solid Earth, pending the amendments and integrations as requested by the Topical Editor.
Please also take into account a careful English language editing.

Many thanks for choosing Solid Earth,

Sincerely Yours,

Federico rossetti