Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-229-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-229-2022
Method article
 | 
28 Jan 2022
Method article |  | 28 Jan 2022

On the choice of finite element for applications in geodynamics

Cedric Thieulot and Wolfgang Bangerth

Viewed

Total article views: 2,027 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,352 628 47 2,027 47 39
  • HTML: 1,352
  • PDF: 628
  • XML: 47
  • Total: 2,027
  • BibTeX: 47
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jun 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jun 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,027 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,927 with geography defined and 100 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
One of the main numerical methods to solve the mass, momentum, and energy conservation equations in geodynamics is the finite-element method. Four main types of elements have been used in the past decades in hundreds of publications. For the first time we compare results obtained with these four elements on a series of geodynamical benchmarks and applications and draw conclusions as to which are the best ones and which are to be preferably avoided.