Bangerth, W., Dannberg, J., Fraters, M., Gassmöller, R., Glerum, A., Heister, T., Myhill, B., and Naliboff, J.:
ASPECT: Advanced Solver for
Problems in Earth’s ConvecTion, Computational Infrastructure for
Geodynamics, available at:
https://www.math.clemson.edu/~heister/manual.pdf, last access: 17 January 2022. a
Bochev, P. B., Dohrmann, C. R., and Gunzburger, M. D.: Stabilization of
Low-order Mixed Finite Elements for the Stokes Equations, SIAM Journal on
Numerical Analysis, 44, 82–101,
https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036142905444482, 2006.
a,
b
Boffi, D. and Gastaldi, L.: On the quadrilateral Q2–P1 element for the Stokes
problem, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 39,
1001–1011, 2002. a
Boffi, D., Cavallini, N., Gardini, F., and Gastaldi, L.: Local Mass
Conservation of Stokes Finite Elements, J. Sci. Comput., 52,
383–400,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-011-9549-4, 2011.
a
Braun, J., Thieulot, C., Fullsack, P., DeKool, M., and Huismans, R.: DOUAR: a
new three-dimensional creeping flow model for the solution of geological
problems, Phys. Earth. Planet. Int., 171, 76–91, 2008. a
Brezzi, F. and Pitkäranta, J.: On the stabilization of finite element
approximations of the Stokes equations, Vol. 10, Notes on numerical
fluid mechanics, edited by: Hackbusch, W., 11–19, Vieweg
+Teubner Verlag,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14169-3_2, 1984.
a
Brune, S., Heine, C., Clift, P. D., and Pérez-Gussinyé, M.: Rifted
margin architecture and crustal rheology: reviewing Iberia-Newfoundland,
central South Atlantic, and South China sea, Mar. Petrol. Geol.,
79, 257–281, 2017. a
Burstedde, C., Ghattas, O., Stadler, G., Tu, T., and Wilcox, L.: Parallel
scalable adjoint-based adaptive solution of variable-viscosity Stokes flow
problems, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 198,
1691–1700,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.12.015, 2009.
a,
b
Burstedde, C., Stadler, G., Alisic, L., Wilcox, L., Tan, E., Gurnis, M., and
Ghattas, O.: Large-scale adaptive mantle convection simulation,
Geophy. J. Int., 192, 889–906,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs070, 2013.
a,
b
Cerpa, N., Hassani, R., Gerbault, M., and Prévost, J.-H.: A fictitious
domain method for lithosphere-asthenosphere interaction: Application to
periodic slab folding in the upper mantle, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 15, 1852–1877,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005241,
2014.
a
Cerpa, N., Araya, R., Gerbault, M., and Hassani, R.: Relationship between slab
dip and topography segmentation in an oblique subduction zone: Insights from
numerical modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 5786–5795,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064047, 2015.
a
Cerpa, N., Guillaume, B., and Martinod, J.: The interplay between overriding
plate kinematics, slab dip and tectonics, Geophys. J. Int., 215, 1789–1802,
2018. a
Clevenger, T., Heister, T., Kanschat, G., and Kronbichler, M.: A flexible,
parallel, adaptive geometric multigrid method for FEM, ACM T. Math.
Software, 47, 7,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3425193, 2020.
a
Crameri, F., Schmeling, H., Golabek, G., Duretz, T., Orendt, R., Buiter, S.,
May, D., Kaus, B., Gerya, T., and Tackley, P.: A comparison of numerical
surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: an evaluation of the
“sticky air” method, Geophys. J. Int., 189, 38–54, 2012. a
Crouzeix, M. and Raviart, P.-A.: Conforming and nonconforming finite element
methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations I, RAIRO, 7,
33–75, 1973. a
Dabrowski, M., Krotkiewski, M., and Schmid, D.: MILAMIN: Matlab based finite
element solver for large problems, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, Q04030,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001719, 2008.
a,
b
Davies, D., Wilson, C., and Kramer, S.: Fluidity: A fully unstructured
anisotropic adaptive mesh computational modeling framework for geodynamics,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q06001,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003551, 2011.
a
de Montserrat, A., Morgan, J. P., and Hasenclever, J.: LaCoDe: a Lagrangian
two-dimensional thermo-mechanical code for large-strain compressible
visco-elastic geodynamical modeling, Tectonophysics, 767, 228173,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228173, 2019.
a
Deubelbeiss, Y. and Kaus, B.: Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian numerical
techniques for the Stokes equations in the presence of strongly varying
viscosity, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 171, 92–111,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.023, 2008.
a,
b
Dohrmann, C. and Bochev, P.: A stabilized finite element method for the Stokes
problem based on polynomial pressure projections, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids,
46, 183–201,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.752, 2004.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h
Donea, J. and Huerta, A.: Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems, John Wiley
& Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-49666-3, 2003.
a,
b,
c
Douglas, J., Santos, J. E., Sheen, D., and Ye, X.: Nonconforming Galerkin
methods based on quadrilateral elements for second order elliptic problems,
ESAIM: Math. Model. Num., 33, 747–770, 1999. a
Duretz, T., May, D., Gerya, T., and Tackley, P.: Discretization errors and
free surface stabilisation in the finite difference and marker-in-cell method
for applied geodynamics: A numerical study, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q07004,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003567, 2011.
a,
b
Duretz, T., de Borst, R., Yamato, P., and Le Pourhiet, L.: Towards robust and
predictive geodynamic modelling: the way forward in frictional plasticity,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086027,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086027, 2020.
a
Elman, H., Silvester, D., and Wathen, A.: Finite Elements and Fast Iterative
Solvers, Oxford Science Publications, ISBN 978-0-19-967879-2, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Fraters, M., Bangerth, W., Thieulot, C., Glerum, A., and Spakman, W.:
Efficient and Practical Newton Solvers for Nonlinear Stokes Systems in
Geodynamic Problems, Geophys. J. Int., 218, 873–894,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz183, 2019.
a
Gerya, T.: Numerical Geodynamic Modelling, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-107-14314-2, 2019. a
Gerya, T., May, D., and Duretz, T.: An adaptive staggered grid finite
difference method for modeling geodynamic Stokes flows with strongly variable
viscosity, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 14, 1200–1225,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20078, 2013.
a
Gmeiner, B., Rüde, U., Stengel, H., Waluga, C., and Wohlmuth, B.: Performance
and scalability of hierarchical hybrid multigrid solvers for Stokes systems,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 37, C143–C168,
https://doi.org/10.1137/130941353, 2015.
a
Gresho, P. and Sani, R.: Incompressible flow and the Finite Element Method, vol
II, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, ISBN 978-0471492504, 2000. a
Gresho, P., Chan, S., Christon, M., and Hindmarsch, A.: A little more on
stabilised
Q1Q1 for transient viscous incompressible flow,
Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 21, 837–856, 1995. a
Heister, T., Dannberg, J., Gassmöller, R., and Bangerth, W.: High Accuracy
Mantle Convection Simulation through Modern Numerical Methods. II: Realistic
Models and Problems, Geophys. J. Int., 210, 833–851,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx195, 2017.
a,
b,
c
Huismans, R. and Beaumont, C.: Complex rifted continental margins explained by
dynamical models of depth-dependent lithospheric extension, Geology, 30,
211–214, 2002. a
Jacquey, A. B., Rattez, H., and Veveakis, M.: Strain localization
regularization and patterns formation in rate-dependent plastic materials
with multiphysics coupling, J. Mech. Phys. Solids,
152, 104422,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104422, 2021.
a
Jadamec, M. and Billen, M.: The role of rheology and slab shape on rapid
mantle flow: Three-dimensional numerical models of the Alaska slab edge,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B02304,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008563, 2012.
a
Jammes, S. and Huismans, R.: Structural styles of mountain building: Controls
of lithospheric rheologic stratification and extensional inheritance,
J. Geophys. Res., 117, B10403,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009376, 2012.
a
Kaus, B., Mühlhaus, H., and May, D.: A stabilization algorithm for
geodynamic numerical simulations with a free surface,
Phys. Earth Planet. In., 181, 12–20,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2010.04.007,
2010.
a
Kaus, B., Popov, A., Baumann, T., Pusok, A., Bauville, A., Fernandez, N., and
Collignon, M.: Forward and Inverse Modelling of Lithospheric Deformation on
Geological Timescales, 11–12 February 20
16, NIC Symposium 2016, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC), 299–307, 2016. a
King, S., Raefsky, A., and Hager, B.: ConMan: Vectorizing a finite element
code for incompressible two-dimensional convection in the Earth’s mantle,
Phys. Earth Planet. In., 59, 195–208,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(90)90225-M, 1990.
a
Kronbichler, M., Heister, T., and Bangerth, W.: High accuracy mantle
convection simulation through modern numerical methods, Geophys. J. Int.,
191, 12–29,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05609.x, 2012.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i
Le Pourhiet, L., Huet, B., May, D., Labrousse, L., and Jolivet, L.:
Kinematic interpretation of the 3D shapes of metamorphic core complexes,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 13, Q09002,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004271, 2012.
a
Lechmann, S., May, D., Kaus, B., and Schmalholz, S.: Comparing thin-sheet
models with 3-D multilayer models for continental collision,
Geophys. J. Int., 187, 10–33, 2011. a
Lehmann, R., Lukacova-Medvidova, M., Kaus, B., and Popov, A.: Comparison of
continuous and discontinuous Galerkin approaches for variable-viscosity
Stokes flow, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 96, 733–746,
https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201400274,
2015.
a
Leng, W. and Zhong, S.: Implementation and application of adaptive mesh
refinement for thermochemical mantle convection studies,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q04006,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003425, 2011.
a
May, D., Brown, J., and Le Pourhiet, L.: A scalable, matrix-free multigrid
preconditioner for finite element discretizations of heterogeneous Stokes
flow, Comput. Method. Appl. M., 290, 496–523,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.014, 2015.
a,
b,
c,
d
McNamara, A. K. and Zhong, S.: Thermochemical structures within a spherical
mantle: Superplumes or piles?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
109, B07402,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002847, 2004.
a
Moresi, L., Dufour, F., and Mühlhaus, H.: A Lagrangian integration point
finite element method for large deformation modeling of visco-elastic
geomaterials, J. Comput. Phys., 184, 476–497,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00031-1, 2003.
a,
b
Moresi, L., Landry, W., Hodkison, L., Turnbull, R., Lemiale, V., May, D.,
Stegman, D., Velic, M., Sunter, P., and Giordani, J.: Gale v2.0.1, Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics [software], available at:
https://geodynamics.org/cig/software/gale/ (last access: 17 January 2022), 2012. a
Naliboff, J. and Buiter, S.: Rift reactivation and migration during multiphase
extension, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 421, 58–67, 2015.
a,
b
O'Neill, C., Moresi, L., Müller, D., Albert, R., and Dufour, F.: Ellipsis
3D: a particle-in-cell finite element hybrid code for modelling mantle
convection and lithospheric deformation, Comput. Geosci., 32,
1769–1779, 2006. a
Plunder, A., Thieulot, C., and van Hinsbergen, D. J. J.: The effect of obliquity on temperature in subduction zones: insights from 3-D numerical modeling, Solid Earth, 9, 759–776,
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-759-2018, 2018.
a
Popov, A. and Sobolev, S.: SLIM3D: a tool for three-dimensional
thermomechanical modelling of lithospheric deformation with
elasto-visco-plastic rheology, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 171, 55–75,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.03.007, 2008.
a,
b
Sani, R., Gresho, P., Lee, R., and Griffiths, D.: The cause and cure (?) of the
spurious pressures generated by certain FEM solutions of the incompressible
Navier-Stokes equations: part 1, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 1, 17–43,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650010104, 1981a.
a
Sani, R., Gresho, P., Lee, R., Griffiths, D., and Engelman, M.: The cause and
cure (?) of the spurious pressures generated by certain FEM solutions of the
incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: part 2, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 1,
171–204,
https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650010206, 1981b.
a
Schuh-Senlis, M., Thieulot, C., Cupillard, P., and Caumon, G.: Towards the application of Stokes flow equations to structural restoration simulations, Solid Earth, 11, 1909–1930,
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1909-2020, 2020.
a
Silvester, D. and Kechkar, N.: Stabilised bilinear-constant velocity-pressure
finite elements for the conjugate gradient solution of the stokes problem,
Comput. Method. Appl. M., 79, 71–86,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(90)90095-4, 1990.
a
Stadler, G., Gurnis, M., Burstedde, C., Wilcox, L., Alisic, L., and Ghattas,
O.: The dynamics of plate tectonics and mantle flow: from local to global
scales, Science, 329, 1033–1038,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191223, 2010.
a
Suckale, J., Nave, J.-C., and Hager, B.: It takes three to tango: 1.
Simulating buoyancy-driven flow in the presence of large viscosity
contrasts, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B07409,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006916, 2010.
a
Taylor, C. and Hood, P.: A numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations
using the finite element technique, Comput. Fluids, 1, 73–100, 1973.
a,
b
Thielmann, M. and Kaus, B.: Shear heating induced lithospheric-scale
localization: Does it result in subduction?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
359–360, 1–13, 2012. a
Thielmann, M., May, D., and Kaus, B.: Discretization errors in the Hybrid
Finite Element Particle-In-Cell Method, Pure Appl. Geophys., 171,
2164–2184,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0808-9, 2014.
a,
b
Thieulot, C., Fullsack, P., and Braun, J.: Adaptive octree-based finite element
analysis of two- and three-dimensional indentation problems,
J. Geophys. Res., 113, B12207,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005591, 2008.
a
Weismüller, J., Gmeiner, B., Ghelichkhan, S., Huber, M., John, L.,
Wohlmuth, B., Rüde, U., and Bunge, H.-P.: Fast asthenosphere motion in
high-resolution global mantle flow models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
7429–7435,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063727, 2015.
a
Zhong, S.: Constraints on thermochemical convection of the mantle from plume
heat flux, plume excess temperature, and upper mantle temperature, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, B04409,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003972, 2006.
a
Zhong, S., Zuber, M., Moresi, L., and Gurnis, M.: The role of
temperature-dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models
of mantle convection, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11063–11082,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900003, 2000.
a
Zhong, S., McNamara, A., Tan, E., Moresi, L., and Gurnis, M.: A benchmark
study on mantle convection in a 3-D spherical shell using CitcomS,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, Q10017,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002048, 2008.
a
