Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Solid Earth, 13, 849–873, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-849-2022
Solid Earth, 13, 849–873, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-849-2022
Method article
04 May 2022
Method article | 04 May 2022

Benchmark forward gravity schemes: the gravity field of a realistic lithosphere model WINTERC-G

Barend Cornelis Root et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,454 343 40 1,837 82 27 20
  • HTML: 1,454
  • PDF: 343
  • XML: 40
  • Total: 1,837
  • Supplement: 82
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,730 with geography defined and 107 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Feb 2023
Download
Short summary
Several alternative gravity modelling techniques and associated numerical codes with their own advantages and limitations are available for the solid Earth community. With upcoming state-of-the-art lithosphere density models and accurate global gravity field data sets, it is vital to understand the differences of the various approaches. In this paper, we discuss the four widely used techniques: spherical harmonics, tesseroid integration, triangle integration, and hexahedral integration.