Solid Earth
Solid Earth
SE
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-849-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-849-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 5
Method article
 | 
04 May 2022
Method article |  | 04 May 2022

Benchmark forward gravity schemes: the gravity field of a realistic lithosphere model WINTERC-G

Barend Cornelis Root, Josef Sebera, Wolfgang Szwillus, Cedric Thieulot, Zdeněk Martinec, and Javier Fullea

Viewed

Total article views: 2,918 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,117 708 93 2,918 210 91 80
  • HTML: 2,117
  • PDF: 708
  • XML: 93
  • Total: 2,918
  • Supplement: 210
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 80
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,918 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,778 with geography defined and 140 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 30 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Several alternative gravity modelling techniques and associated numerical codes with their own advantages and limitations are available for the solid Earth community. With upcoming state-of-the-art lithosphere density models and accurate global gravity field data sets, it is vital to understand the differences of the various approaches. In this paper, we discuss the four widely used techniques: spherical harmonics, tesseroid integration, triangle integration, and hexahedral integration.
Read more
Share