Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-661-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-661-2017
Research article
 | 
29 May 2017
Research article |  | 29 May 2017

Evaluating of the spatial heterogeneity of soil loss tolerance and its effects on erosion risk in the carbonate areas of southern China

Yue Li, Xiao Yong Bai, Shi Jie Wang, Luo Yi Qin, Yi Chao Tian, and Guang Jie Luo

Related authors

Dangerous degree forecast of soil loss on highway slopes in mountainous areas of the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau (China) using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation
Yue Li, Shi Qi, Bin Liang, Junming Ma, Baihan Cheng, Cong Ma, Yidan Qiu, and Qinyan Chen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 757–774, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-757-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-757-2019, 2019
Short summary
Soil erosion evolution and spatial correlation analysis in a typical karst geomorphology using RUSLE with GIS
Cheng Zeng, Shijie Wang, Xiaoyong Bai, Yangbing Li, Yichao Tian, Yue Li, Luhua Wu, and Guangjie Luo
Solid Earth, 8, 721–736, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-721-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-721-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Soil science
Soil erodibility and its influencing factors on the Loess Plateau of China: a case study in the Ansai watershed
Wenwu Zhao, Hui Wei, Lizhi Jia, Stefani Daryanto, Xiao Zhang, and Yanxu Liu
Solid Earth, 9, 1507–1516, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1507-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1507-2018, 2018
Short summary
Stability of soil organic matter in Cryosols of the maritime Antarctic: insights from 13C NMR and electron spin resonance spectroscopy
Evgeny Abakumov and Ivan Alekseev
Solid Earth, 9, 1329–1339, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1329-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1329-2018, 2018
Influence of slope aspect on the microbial properties of rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric soils on the Loess Plateau, China
Ze Min Ai, Jiao Yang Zhang, Hong Fei Liu, Sha Xue, and Guo Bin Liu
Solid Earth, 9, 1157–1168, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1157-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1157-2018, 2018
Short summary
Assessment of soil erosion vulnerability in the heavily populated and ecologically fragile communities in Motozintla de Mendoza, Chiapas, Mexico
Selene B. González-Morales, Alex Mayer, and Neptalí Ramírez-Marcial
Solid Earth, 9, 745–757, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-745-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-745-2018, 2018
Short summary
Simulating carbon sequestration using cellular automata and land use assessment for Karaj, Iran
Ali Khatibi, Sharareh Pourebrahim, and Mazlin Bin Mokhtar
Solid Earth, 9, 735–744, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-735-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-735-2018, 2018
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, E. B.: Rates of soil formation: Implications for soil-loss tolerance, Soil Sci., 145 37–45, 1988.
Bai, X., Zhang, X., Long, Y., Liu, X., and Zhang, S.: Use of 137Cs and 210Pbex, measurements on deposits in a karst depression to study the erosional response of a small karst catchment in southwest china to land-use change, Hydrol Process., 27, 822–829, 2013.
Bazzoffi, P.: Soil erosion tolerance and water runoff control: minimum environmental standards, Reg. Environ. Change, 9, 169–179, 2009.
Bhattacharyya, P., Bhatt, K. V., and Mandal, D.: Soil loss tolerance limits for planning of soil conservation measures in Shivalik-Himalayan region of India, Catena, 73, 117–124, 2008.
Cao, J. H., Jiang, Z. C., Yang, D. S., Tong, L. Q., Pei, J. G., Luo, W. Q., and Yang, H.: Soil and water loss, desertification controlled by karst environment in Guizhou Karst region, Soil Water Conserv. China, 1, 20–23, 2009 (in Chinese).
Download
Short summary
First, we report the following discovery: T values are spatially heterogeneous, and a minimum of three criteria should be considered instead of only a single criterion in karst areas. In fact, our findings disprove the old “one region, one T value” concept. Second, we proposed a new viewpoint: in karst regions, a large soil erosion modulus does not correspond to severe soil erosion. Although T value can reflect soil sensitivity, this value cannot indicate soil erosion risk.