Dear authors,

Thank you for taking the reviewers comments seriously and for the detailed response and modifications. I have a few more small additional comments that I would like you to address, after which I will be happy to recommend the manuscript for publication. My comments are listed below. Thank you.

Caroline Beghein

Additional comments:
-Regarding reviewer 1, comment #3 (“The authors state that not only P and S wavespeeds but also density can be constrained by full-waveform inversion. However, the results of the study seem not promising to support this statement.”): Thank you for the expanded discussion about density in section 6.4. In addition to this, and in reference to reviewer 1’s comment copied above, I would like to see the last sentence of the introduction slightly modified so that the reader is not under the impression that density can now be constrained with waveform tomography.
- It would also be good to add to the manuscript the explanation about the histogram split into two parts in Figure 6. I do not see it in the text.
- The discussion about the apparent anti-correlation between Vp and Vs would also be useful to add to the main text.
-Please, add the anisotropy discussion related to Figure 8 in the main text as requested by reviewer 2 and myself.

Dear Nienke,
many thanks for the revision that allows the paper to be published now. I'm looking forward seeing it final in SE, Lotte.