Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
Solid Earth, 10, 1663–1684, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1663-2019

Special issue: Understanding the unknowns: the impact of uncertainty in the...

Solid Earth, 10, 1663–1684, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1663-2019

Method article 10 Oct 2019

Method article | 10 Oct 2019

Topological analysis in Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty propagation

Evren Pakyuz-Charrier et al.

Related authors

Integration of geoscientific uncertainty into geophysical inversion by means of local gradient regularization
Jeremie Giraud, Mark Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Mark Jessell, Roland Martin, and Evren Pakyuz-Charrier
Solid Earth, 10, 193–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-193-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-193-2019, 2019
Short summary
Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty estimation on structural data in implicit 3-D geological modeling, a guide for disturbance distribution selection and parameterization
Evren Pakyuz-Charrier, Mark Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Jeremie Giraud, and Mark Jessell
Solid Earth, 9, 385–402, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-385-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-385-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject area: Crustal structure and composition | Editorial team: Geodesy, gravity, and geomagnetism | Discipline: Geodesy
Sequential inversion of GOCE satellite gravity gradient data and terrestrial gravity data for the lithospheric density structure in the North China Craton
Yu Tian and Yong Wang
Solid Earth, 11, 1121–1144, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1121-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1121-2020, 2020
Short summary
Towards plausible lithological classification from geophysical inversion: honouring geological principles in subsurface imaging
Jérémie Giraud, Mark Lindsay, Mark Jessell, and Vitaliy Ogarko
Solid Earth, 11, 419–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-419-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-419-2020, 2020
Short summary
Joint analysis of the magnetic field and total gradient intensity in central Europe
Maurizio Milano, Maurizio Fedi, and J. Derek Fairhead
Solid Earth, 10, 697–712, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-697-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-697-2019, 2019
Short summary
Integration of geoscientific uncertainty into geophysical inversion by means of local gradient regularization
Jeremie Giraud, Mark Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Mark Jessell, Roland Martin, and Evren Pakyuz-Charrier
Solid Earth, 10, 193–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-193-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-193-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrahamsen, P., Omre, H., and Lia, O.: Stochastic models for seismic depth conversion of geological horizons, Offshore Europe, 329–341, 1991. 
Aguilar, M. Á. L., Khrennikov, A., and Oleschko, K.: From axiomatics of quantum probability to modelling geological uncertainty and management of intelligent hydrocarbon reservoirs with the theory of open quantum systems, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 376, 20170225, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0225, 2018. 
Aug, C., Chilès, J.-P., Courrioux, G., and Lajaunie, C.: 3-D geological modelling and uncertainty: The potential-field method, in: Geostatistics Banff 2004, Springer, 145–154, 2005. 
Bardossy, G. and Fodor, J.: Traditional and NewWays to Handle Uncertainty in Geology, Nat. Ressour. Res., 10, 179–187, 2001. 
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992. 
Download
Short summary
This paper improves the Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty propagation (MCUP) method for 3-D geological modeling. Topological heterogeneity is observed in the model suite. The study demonstrates that such heterogeneity arises from piecewise nonlinearity inherent to 3-D geological models and contraindicates use of global uncertainty estimation methods. Topological-clustering-driven uncertainty estimation is proposed as a demonstrated alternative to address plausible model heterogeneity.