Articles | Volume 13, issue 3
Review article
 | Highlight paper
17 Mar 2022
Review article | Highlight paper |  | 17 Mar 2022

101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth

Iris van Zelst, Fabio Crameri, Adina E. Pusok, Anne Glerum, Juliane Dannberg, and Cedric Thieulot

Related authors

The effect of temperature-dependent material properties on simple thermal models of subduction zones
Iris van Zelst, Cedric Thieulot, and Timothy J. Craig
Solid Earth, 14, 683–707,,, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject area: Tectonic plate interactions, magma genesis, and lithosphere deformation at all scales | Editorial team: Geodynamics and quantitative modelling | Discipline: Geodynamics
The influence of viscous slab rheology on numerical models of subduction
Natalie Hummel, Susanne Buiter, and Zoltán Erdős
Solid Earth, 15, 567–587,,, 2024
Short summary
Statistical appraisal of geothermal heat flow observations in the Arctic
Judith Freienstein, Wolfgang Szwillus, Agnes Wansing, and Jörg Ebbing
Solid Earth, 15, 513–533,,, 2024
Short summary
Thrusts control the thermal maturity of accreted sediments
Utsav Mannu, David Fernández-Blanco, Ayumu Miyakawa, Taras Gerya, and Masataka Kinoshita
Solid Earth, 15, 1–21,,, 2024
Short summary
Various lithospheric deformation patterns derived from rheological contrasts between continental terranes: Insights from 2-D numerical simulations
Renxian Xie, Lin Chen, Jason P. Morgan, and Yonghsun John Chen
EGUsphere,,, 2023
Short summary
The role of continental lithospheric thermal structure in the evolution of orogenic systems: application to the Himalayan–Tibetan collision zone
Mengxue Liu, Dinghui Yang, and Rui Qi
Solid Earth, 14, 1155–1168,,, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aagaard, B., Knepley, M., and Williams, C.: A domain decomposition approach to implementing fault slip in finite-element models of quasi-static and dynamic crustal deformation, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 3059–3079,, 2013. a, b
Agrusta, R., van Hunen, J., and Goes, S.: The effect of metastable pyroxene on the slab dynamics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8800–8808, 2014. a
Aharonov, E., Whitehead, J., Kelemen, P., and Spiegelman, M.: Channeling instability of upwelling melt in the mantle, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 100, 20433–20450, 1995. a
Ahrens, J., Geveci, B., and Law, C.: ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large Data Visualization, Visualization Handbook, Elsevier, (last access: 24 February 2022), 2005. a
Alboussière, T. and Ricard, Y.: Reflections on dissipation associated with thermal convection, J. Fluid. Mech., 725,, 2013. a
Short summary
Geodynamic modelling provides a powerful tool to investigate processes in the Earth’s crust, mantle, and core that are not directly observable. In this review, we present a comprehensive yet concise overview of the modelling process with an emphasis on best practices. We also highlight synergies with related fields, such as seismology and geology. Hence, this review is the perfect starting point for anyone wishing to (re)gain a solid understanding of geodynamic modelling as a whole.