Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-251-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-251-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Feb 2024
Research article |
| 14 Feb 2024
| 14 Feb 2024
Linked and fully coupled 3D earthquake dynamic rupture and tsunami modeling for the Húsavík–Flatey Fault Zone in North Iceland
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Alice-Agnes Gabriel
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
Sara Aniko Wirp
Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
Bo Li
GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
Thomas Ulrich
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
Claudia Abril
Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
Benedikt Halldórsson
Division of Processing and Research, Icelandic Meteorological Office, Reykjavík, Iceland
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
Related authors
No articles found.
Robin Lacassin, Maud Devès, Stephen P. Hicks, Jean-Paul Ampuero, Remy Bossu, Lucile Bruhat, Daryono, Desianto F. Wibisono, Laure Fallou, Eric J. Fielding, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Jamie Gurney, Janine Krippner, Anthony Lomax, Muh. Ma'rufin Sudibyo, Astyka Pamumpuni, Jason R. Patton, Helen Robinson, Mark Tingay, and Sotiris Valkaniotis
Geosci. Commun., 3, 129–146, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-129-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-129-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Among social media platforms, Twitter is valued by scholars to disseminate scientific information. Using two 2018 geohazard events as examples, we show that collaborative open data sharing and discussion on Twitter promote very rapid building of knowledge. This breaks down the traditional
ivory towerof academia, making science accessible to nonacademics who can follow the discussion. It also presents the opportunity for a new type of scientific approach within global virtual teams.
C. Pelties, A.-A. Gabriel, and J.-P. Ampuero
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 847–866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-847-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-847-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject area: The evolving Earth surface | Editorial team: Seismics, seismology, paleoseismology, geoelectrics, and electromagnetics | Discipline: Seismology
Earthquake monitoring using deep learning with a case study of the Kahramanmaras Turkey earthquake aftershock sequence
A borehole trajectory inversion scheme to adjust the measurement geometry for 3D travel-time tomography on glaciers
Ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) noise reduction from horizontal and vertical components using harmonic–percussive separation algorithms
Towards real-time seismic monitoring of a geothermal plant using Distributed Acoustic Sensing
Upper-lithospheric structure of northeastern Venezuela from joint inversion of surface-wave dispersion and receiver functions
A study on the effect of input data length on a deep-learning-based magnitude classifier
Multi-array analysis of volcano-seismic signals at Fogo and Brava, Cape Verde
Reflection imaging of complex geology in a crystalline environment using virtual-source seismology: case study from the Kylylahti polymetallic mine, Finland
The damaging character of shallow 20th century earthquakes in the Hainaut coal area (Belgium)
The effect of 2020 COVID-19 lockdown measures on seismic noise recorded in Romania
Accelerating Bayesian microseismic event location with deep learning
Strain to ground motion conversion of distributed acoustic sensing data for earthquake magnitude and stress drop determination
Regional centroid moment tensor inversion of small to moderate earthquakes in the Alps using the dense AlpArray seismic network: challenges and seismotectonic insights
Unprecedented quiescence in resource development area allows detection of long-lived latent seismicity
Seismic monitoring of urban activity in Barcelona during the COVID-19 lockdown
Seismic signature of the COVID-19 lockdown at the city scale: a case study with low-cost seismometers in the city of Querétaro, Mexico
Characterizing the oceanic ambient noise as recorded by the dense seismo-acoustic Kazakh network
Seismic evidence of the COVID-19 lockdown measures: a case study from eastern Sicily (Italy)
Sensing Earth and environment dynamics by telecommunication fiber-optic sensors: an urban experiment in Pennsylvania, USA
Effects of finite source rupture on landslide triggering: the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
Wei Li, Megha Chakraborty, Jonas Köhler, Claudia Quinteros-Cartaya, Georg Rümpker, and Nishtha Srivastava
Solid Earth, 15, 197–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seismic phase picking and magnitude estimation are crucial components of real-time earthquake monitoring and early warning. Here, we test the potential of deep learning in real-time earthquake monitoring. We introduce DynaPicker, which leverages dynamic convolutional neural networks for event detection and arrival-time picking, and use the deep-learning model CREIME for magnitude estimation. This workflow is tested on the continuous recording of the Turkey earthquake aftershock sequences.
Sebastian Hellmann, Melchior Grab, Cedric Patzer, Andreas Bauder, and Hansruedi Maurer
Solid Earth, 14, 805–821, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-805-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-805-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Acoustic waves are suitable to analyse the physical properties of the subsurface. For this purpose, boreholes are quite useful to deploy a source and receivers in the target area to get a comprehensive high-resolution dataset. However, when conducting such experiments in a subsurface such as glaciers that continuously move, the boreholes get deformed. In our study, we therefore developed a method that allows an analysis of the ice while considering deformations.
Zahra Zali, Theresa Rein, Frank Krüger, Matthias Ohrnberger, and Frank Scherbaum
Solid Earth, 14, 181–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-181-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-14-181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Investigation of the global Earth's structure benefits from the analysis of ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) data that allow an improved seismic illumination of dark spots of crustal and mantle structures in the oceanic regions of the Earth. However, recordings from the ocean bottom are often highly contaminated by noise. We developed an OBS noise reduction algorithm, which removes much of the oceanic noise while preserving the earthquake signal and does not introduce waveform distortion.
Jerome Azzola, Katja Thiemann, and Emmanuel Gaucher
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1417, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1417, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Distributed Acoustic Sensing is applied to the micro-seismic monitoring of a geothermal plant. In this domain, the feasibility of managing the large flow of generated data and their suitability to monitor locally induced seismicity was yet to be assessed. The proposed monitoring system efficiently managed the acquisition, processing and saving of the data over a 6-month period. This testing period proved that the monitoring concept advantageously complements more classical monitoring networks.
Roberto Cabieces, Mariano S. Arnaiz-Rodríguez, Antonio Villaseñor, Elizabeth Berg, Andrés Olivar-Castaño, Sergi Ventosa, and Ana M. G. Ferreira
Solid Earth, 13, 1781–1801, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1781-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1781-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a new 3D shear-wave velocity model of the lithosphere of northeastern Venezuela, including new Moho and Vp / Vs maps. Data were retrieved from land and broadband ocean bottom seismometers from the BOLIVAR experiment.
Megha Chakraborty, Wei Li, Johannes Faber, Georg Rümpker, Horst Stoecker, and Nishtha Srivastava
Solid Earth, 13, 1721–1729, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Earthquake magnitude is a crucial parameter in defining its damage potential, and hence its speedy determination is essential to issue an early warning in regions close to the epicentre. This study summarises our findings in an attempt to apply deep-learning-based classifiers to earthquake waveforms, particularly with respect to finding an optimum length of input data. We conclude that the input length has no significant effect on the model accuracy, which varies between 90 %–94 %.
Carola Leva, Georg Rümpker, and Ingo Wölbern
Solid Earth, 13, 1243–1258, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1243-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1243-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The seismicity of Fogo and Brava, Cape Verde, is dominated by volcano-tectonic earthquakes in the area of Brava and volcanic seismic signals, such as hybrid events, on Fogo. We locate these events using a multi-array analysis, which allows the localization of seismic events occurring outside the network and of volcanic signals lacking clear phases. We observe exceptionally high apparent velocities for the hybrid events located on Fogo. These velocities are likely caused by a complex ray path.
Michal Chamarczuk, Michal Malinowski, Deyan Draganov, Emilia Koivisto, Suvi Heinonen, and Sanna Rötsä
Solid Earth, 13, 705–723, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-705-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-705-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In passive seismic measurement, all noise sources from the environment, such as traffic, vibrations caused by distant excavation, and explosive work from underground mines, are utilized. In the Kylylahti experiment, receivers recorded ambient noise sources for 30 d. These recordings were subjected to data analysis and processing using novel methodology developed in our study and used for imaging the subsurface geology of the Kylylahti mine area.
Thierry Camelbeeck, Koen Van Noten, Thomas Lecocq, and Marc Hendrickx
Solid Earth, 13, 469–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Over the 20th century, shallow damaging seismicity occurred in and near the Hainaut coal mining area in Belgium. We provide an overview of earthquake parameters and impacts, combining felt and damage testimonies and instrumental measurements. Shallower earthquakes have a depth and timing compatible with mining activity. The most damaging events occurred deeper than the mines but could still have been triggered by mining-caused crustal changes. Our modelling can be applied to other regions.
Bogdan Grecu, Felix Borleanu, Alexandru Tiganescu, Natalia Poiata, Raluca Dinescu, and Dragos Tataru
Solid Earth, 12, 2351–2368, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-2351-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-2351-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The lockdown imposed in Romania to prevent the spread of COVID-19 has significantly impacted human activity across the country. By analyzing the ground vibrations recorded at seismic stations, we were able to monitor the changes in human activity before and during the lockdown.
The reduced human activity during the lockdown has also provided a good opportunity for stations sited in noisy urban areas to record earthquake signals that would not have been recorded under normal conditions.
Alessio Spurio Mancini, Davide Piras, Ana Margarida Godinho Ferreira, Michael Paul Hobson, and Benjamin Joachimi
Solid Earth, 12, 1683–1705, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1683-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1683-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The localization of an earthquake is affected by many uncertainties. To correctly propagate these uncertainties into an estimate of the earthquake coordinates and their associated errors, many simulations of seismic waves are needed. This operation is computationally very intensive, hindering the feasibility of this approach. In this paper, we present a series of deep-learning methods to produce accurate seismic traces in a fraction of the time needed with standard methods.
Itzhak Lior, Anthony Sladen, Diego Mercerat, Jean-Paul Ampuero, Diane Rivet, and Serge Sambolian
Solid Earth, 12, 1421–1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1421-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1421-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The increasing use of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) inhibits the transformation of optical fibers into dense arrays of seismo-acoustic sensors. Here, DAS strain records are converted to ground motions using the waves' apparent velocity. An algorithm for velocity determination is presented, accounting for velocity variations between different seismic waves. The conversion allows for robust determination of fundamental source parameters, earthquake magnitude and stress drop.
Gesa Maria Petersen, Simone Cesca, Sebastian Heimann, Peter Niemz, Torsten Dahm, Daniela Kühn, Jörn Kummerow, Thomas Plenefisch, and the AlpArray and AlpArray-Swath-D working groups
Solid Earth, 12, 1233–1257, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1233-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1233-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Alpine mountains are known for a complex tectonic history. We shed light onto ongoing tectonic processes by studying rupture mechanisms of small to moderate earthquakes between 2016 and 2019 observed by the temporary AlpArray seismic network. The rupture processes of 75 earthquakes were analyzed, along with past earthquakes and deformation data. Our observations point at variations in the underlying tectonic processes and stress regimes across the Alps.
Rebecca O. Salvage and David W. Eaton
Solid Earth, 12, 765–783, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-765-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-765-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Small earthquakes in Alberta and north-east British Columbia have been previously ascribed to industrial activities. The COVID-19 pandemic forced almost all these activities to stop for ~ 4 months. However, unexpectedly, earthquakes still occurred during this time. Some of these earthquakes may be natural and some the result of earthquakes > M6 occurring around the world. However, ~ 65 % of the earthquakes detected may be the remnants of previous fluid injection in the area (
latent seismicity).
Jordi Diaz, Mario Ruiz, and José-Antonio Jara
Solid Earth, 12, 725–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-725-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, the city of Barcelona was covered by a network of 19 seismometers. The results confirm that the quieting of human activity during lockdown has resulted in a reduction of seismic vibrations. The different lockdown phases in Barcelona are recognized consistently at most of the seismic stations. Our contribution demonstrates that seismic noise can be used as a free and reliable tool to monitor human activity in urban environments.
Raphael S. M. De Plaen, Víctor Hugo Márquez-Ramírez, Xyoli Pérez-Campos, F. Ramón Zuñiga, Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez-Pérez, Juan Martín Gómez González, and Lucia Capra
Solid Earth, 12, 713–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-713-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-713-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns in countries with a dominant informal economy have been a greater challenge than in other places. This motivated the monitoring of the mobility of populations with seismic noise throughout the various phases of lockdown and in the city of Querétaro (central Mexico). Our results emphasize the benefit of densifying urban seismic networks, even with low-cost instruments, to observe variations in mobility at the city scale over exclusively relying on mobile technology.
Alexandr Smirnov, Marine De Carlo, Alexis Le Pichon, Nikolai M. Shapiro, and Sergey Kulichkov
Solid Earth, 12, 503–520, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-503-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-503-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Seismic and infrasound methods are techniques used to monitor natural events and explosions. At low frequencies, band signal can be dominated by microbaroms and microseisms. The noise observations in the Kazakh network are performed and compared with source and propagation modeling. The network is dense and well situated for studying very distant source regions of the ambient noise. The prospects are opening for the use of ocean noise in solid Earth and atmosphere tomography.
Andrea Cannata, Flavio Cannavò, Giuseppe Di Grazia, Marco Aliotta, Carmelo Cassisi, Raphael S. M. De Plaen, Stefano Gresta, Thomas Lecocq, Placido Montalto, and Mariangela Sciotto
Solid Earth, 12, 299–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-299-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-299-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
During the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries put in place social interventions, aimed at restricting human mobility, which caused a decrease in the seismic noise, generated by human activities and called anthropogenic seismic noise. In densely populated eastern Sicily, we observed a decrease in the seismic noise amplitude reaching 50 %. We found similarities between the temporal patterns of seismic noise and human mobility, as quantified by mobile-phone-derived data and ship traffic data.
Tieyuan Zhu, Junzhu Shen, and Eileen R. Martin
Solid Earth, 12, 219–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-219-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-219-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the Fiber Optic foR Environmental SEnsEing (FORESEE) project in Pennsylvania, USA, the first continuous-monitoring distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) fiber array in the eastern USA. With the success of collecting 1 year of continuous DAS recordings using nearly 5 km of telecommunication fiber underneath the university campus, we conclude that DAS along with telecommunication fiber will potentially serve the purpose of continuous near-surface seismic monitoring in populated areas.
Sebastian von Specht, Ugur Ozturk, Georg Veh, Fabrice Cotton, and Oliver Korup
Solid Earth, 10, 463–486, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-463-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-463-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We show the landslide response to the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake (Mw 7.1) in central Kyushu (Japan). Landslides are concentrated to the northeast of the rupture, coinciding with the propagation direction of the earthquake. This azimuthal variation in the landslide concentration is linked to the seismic rupture process itself and not to classical landslide susceptibility factors. We propose a new ground-motion model that links the seismic radiation pattern with the landslide distribution.
Cited articles
Abercrombie, R. E. and Ekström, G.: Earthquake slip on oceanic transform faults, Nature, 410, 74–77, https://doi.org/10.1038/35065064, 2001. a
Abril, C., Gudmundsson, O., and the SIL seismological group: Relocating earthquakes with empirical traveltimes, Geophys. J. Int., 214, 2098–2114, https://doi.org/10.1093/GJI/GGY246, 2018. a, b, c, d
Abril, C., Gudmundsson, O., and Tryggvason, A.: Earthquake Relocation in the Tjörnes Fracture Zone, in: Proceedings of the Northquake 2019 workshop, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, Húsavík, 21–24 May 2019, 37–40, ISBN 978-9935-405-58-6, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/Northquake2019.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2019. a, b, c, d
Abril, C., Tryggvason, A., Gudmundsson, and Steffen, R.: Local Earthquake Tomography in the Tjörnes Fracture Zone (North Iceland), J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, e2020JB020212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020212, 2021. a
Ambraseys, N. and Sigbjörnsson, R.: Re-appraisal of the seismicity of Iceland, Polytechnica – Engineering Seismology, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of Iceland, Selfoss, Iceland, ISBN 9797-989-91-4X, 2000. a
Amlani, F., Bhat, H. S., Simons, W. J., Schubnel, A., Vigny, C., Rosakis, A. J., Efendi, J., Elbanna, A. E., Dubernet, P., and Abidin, H. Z.: Supershear shock front contribution to the tsunami from the 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu, Indonesia earthquake, Geophys. J. Int., 230, 2089–2097, https://doi.org/10.1093/GJI/GGAC162, 2022. a
Anderson, E. M.: The dynamics of faulting, Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society, 8, 387–402, https://doi.org/10.1144/TRANSED.8.3.387, 1905. a
Andrews, D. J.: Rupture velocity of plane strain shear cracks, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5679–5687, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB081I032P05679, 1976. a
Angelier, J., Slunga, R., Bergerat, F., Stefansson, R., and Homberg, C.: Perturbation of stress and oceanic rift extension across transform faults shown by earthquake focal mechanisms in Iceland, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 219, 271–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00704-0, 2004. a
Antoine, S. L., Klinger, Y., Delorme, A., and Gold, R. D.: Off-fault deformation in regions of complex fault geometries: The 2013, Mw7.7, Baluchistan rupture (Pakistan), J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2022JB024480, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024480, 2022. a
Aochi, H. and Ulrich, T.: A Probable Earthquake Scenario near Istanbul Determined from Dynamic Simulations, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 105, 1468–1475, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140283, 2015. a
Baba, T., Takahashi, N., Kaneda, Y., Ando, K., Matsuoka, D., and Kato, T.: Parallel Implementation of Dispersive Tsunami Wave Modeling with a Nesting Algorithm for the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami, Pure Appl. Geophys., 172, 3455–3472, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1049-2, 2015. a
Baba, T., Chikasada, N., Imai, K., Tanioka, Y., and Kodaira, S.: Frequency dispersion amplifies tsunamis caused by outer-rise normal faults, Sci. Rep.-UK, 11, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99536-x, 2021. a
Bao, H., Ampuero, J. P., Meng, L., Fielding, E. J., Liang, C., Milliner, C. W., Feng, T., and Huang, H.: Early and persistent supershear rupture of the 2018 magnitude 7.5 Palu earthquake, Nat. Geosci., 12, 200–205, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0297-z, 2019. a
Barreto, A., Viltres, R., Matrau, R., Ófeigsson, B. G., and Jónsson, S.: Insights into Two Decades of continuous and Campaign GPS Data in North Iceland, in: Proceedings of the NorthQuake 2022 workshop, Húsavík, 18–20 October 2022, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, 11–13, ISBN 978-9935-405-70-8, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/NorthQuakeIV-2022.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2022. a
Bayat, F., Kowsari, M., and Halldorsson, B.: A new 3-D finite-fault model of the Southwest Iceland bookshelf transform zone, Geophys. J. Int., 231, 1618–1633, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac272, 2022. a
Ben-Zion, Y., Peng, Z., Okaya, D., Seeber, L., Armbruster, J. G., Ozer, N., Michael, A. J., Baris, S., and Aktar, M.: A shallow fault-zone structure illuminated by trapped waves in the Karadere-Duzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault, western Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 152, 699–717, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01870.x, 2003. a
Ben-Zion, Y., Beroza, G. C., Bohnhoff, M., Gabriel, A., and Mai, P. M.: A Grand Challenge International Infrastructure for Earthquake Science, Seismol. Res. Lett., 93, 2967–2968, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220266, 2022. a
Bernard, E. and Titov, V.: Evolution of tsunami warning systems and products, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 373, https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTA.2014.0371, 2015. a
Biemiller, J., Gabriel, A. A., and Ulrich, T.: The Dynamics of Unlikely Slip: 3D Modeling of Low-Angle Normal Fault Rupture at the Mai'iu Fault, Papua New Guinea, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 23, e2021GC010298, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC010298, 2022. a
Biemiller, J., Gabriel, A.-A., and Ulrich, T.: Dueling dynamics of low-angle normal fault rupture with splay faulting and off-fault damage, Nat. Commun., 14, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37063-1, 2023. a
Bilek, S. and Lay, T.: Subduction zone megathrust earthquakes, Geosphere, 14, 1468–1500, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01608.1, 2018. a
Brandsdóttir, B., Riedel, C., Richter, B., Helgadóttir, G., Kjartansson, E., Detrick, R., Dahm, T., Mayer, L., Calder, B., and Driscoll, N.: Multibeam bathymetric maps of the Kolbeinsey Ridgeand Tjörnes Fracture Zone, N-Iceland, European Geosciences Union, https://meetings.copernicus.org/www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU05/07219/EGU05-J-07219.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2005. a
Brandsdóttir, B., Detrick, R. S., Driscoll, N. W., Karson, J. A., Guðmundsson, G. B., and Jónsdóttir, K.: Postglacial faulting within the Skjálfandi Bay, in: Proceedings of the NorthQuake 2022 workshop, Húsavík, 18–20 October 2022, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, p. 10, ISBN 978-9935-405-70-8, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/NorthQuakeIV-2022.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2022. a
Breuer, A., Heinecke, A., Rannabauer, L., and Bader, M.: High-order ADER-DG minimizes energy- and time-to-solution of SeisSol, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9137 LNCS, Springer, 340–357, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20119-1_25, 2015. a
Burbidge, D., Mueller, C., and Power, W.: The effect of uncertainty in earthquake fault parameters on the maximum wave height from a tsunami propagation model, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2299–2312, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2299-2015, 2015. a
Byerlee, J.: Friction of rocks, Pure Appl. Geophys., 116, 116, 615–626, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876528, 1978. a
Carvajal, M., Araya-Cornejo, C., Sepúlveda, I., Melnick, D., and Haase, J. S.: Nearly Instantaneous Tsunamis Following the Mw 7.5 2018 Palu Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5117–5126, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082578, 2019. a
Cecioni, C., Bellotti, G., Romano, A., Abdolali, A., Sammarco, P., and Franco, L.: Tsunami Early Warning System based on Real-time Measurements of Hydro-acoustic Waves, Procedia Engineer., 70, 311–320, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2014.02.035, 2014. a, b
Celli, N. L., Lebedev, S., Schaeffer, A. J., and Gaina, C.: The tilted Iceland Plume and its effect on the North Atlantic evolution and magmatism, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 569, 117048, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSL.2021.117048, 2021. a
Coulomb, C. A.: Essai sur une application des règles des maximise et minimis a quelque problèmes de statique, Mémoire Académie Royale des Sciences, 7, 1776. a
Crameri, F.: Scientific colour maps, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1243862, 2018. a
Crameri, F., Shephard, G. E., and Heron, P. J.: The misuse of colour in science communication, Nat. Commun., 11, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19160-7, 2020. a
Célérier, B.: Seeking Anderson's faulting in seismicity: A centennial celebration, Rev. Geophys., 46, 4001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000240, 2008. a
de la Puente, J., Ampuero, J.-P., and Käser, M.: Dynamic rupture modeling on unstructured meshes using a discontinuous Galerkin method, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 114, B10302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006271, 2009. a
Demets, C., Gordon, R., and Argus, D.: Geological current plate motions, Geophys. J. Int., 181, 1–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04491.x, 2010. a, b
De Pascale, G. P.: Húsavík-Flatey fault behavior and outstanding data gaps based on insight from major strike slip faults, in: Proceedings of the NorthQuake 2022 workshop, Húsavík, 18–20 October 2022, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, ISBN 978-9935-405-70-8, 2022. a
Douilly, R., Aochi, H., Calais, E., and Freed, A. M.: Three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulations across interacting faults: The Mw7.0, 2010, Haiti earthquake, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 1108–1128, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011595, 2015. a
Duan, B., Liu, Z., and Elliott, A. J.: Multicycle Dynamics of the Aksay Bend Along the Altyn Tagh Fault in Northwest China: 2. The Realistically Complex Fault Geometry, Tectonics, 38, 1120–1137, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005196, 2019. a
Dumbser, M. and Käser, M.: An Arbitrary High Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Elastic Waves on Unstructured Meshes II: The Three-Dimensional Isotropic Case, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 319–336, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03120.x, 2006. a
Einarsson, P.: Earthquakes and present-day tectonism in Iceland, Tectonophysics, 189, 261–279, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(91)90501-I, 1991. a
Einarsson, P.: Plate boundaries, rifts and transforms in Iceland, Jokull, 58, 35–58, https://doi.org/10.33799/jokull2008.58.035, 2008. a
Einarsson, P. and Brandsdóttir, B.: Seismicity of the Northern Volcanic Zone of Iceland, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 166, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.628967, 2021. a
Elbanna, A., Abdelmeguid, M., Ma, X., Amlani, F., Bhat, H. S., Synolakis, C., and Rosakis, A. J.: Anatomy of strike-slip fault tsunami genesis, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, 2025632118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025632118, 2021. a
Feng, W., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Samsonov, S., Almeida, R., and Liu, P.: A Slip Gap of the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji, Xinjiang, China, Earthquake Inferred from Sentinel-1 TOPS Interferometry, Seismol. Res. Lett., 88, 1054–1064, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170019, 2017. a
Fialko, Y., Sandwell, D., Simons, M., and Rosen, P.: Three-dimensional deformation caused by the Bam, Iran, earthquake and the origin of shallow slip deficit, Nature, 435, 295–299, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03425, 2005. a, b
Garcia, S. and Dhont, D.: Structural analysis of the Húsavík-Flatey Transform Fault and its relationships with the rift system in Northern Iceland, Geodin. Acta, 18, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.3166/GA.18.31-41, 2004. a
Gaudreau, E., Hollingsworth, J., Nissen, E., and Funning, G. J.: Complex 3-D Surface Deformation in the 1971 San Fernando, California Earthquake Reveals Static and Dynamic Controls on Off-Fault Deformation, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024985, 2023. a
GEBCO Compilation Group: GEBCO 2020 Grid, https://doi.org/10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9, 2020. a
Geirsson, H., Árnadóttir, T., Völksen, C., Jiang, W., Sturkell, E., Villemin, T., Einarsson, P., Sigmundsson, F., and Stefánsson, R.: Current plate movements across the Mid-Atlantic Ridge determined from 5 years of continuous GPS measurements in Iceland, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 111, B09407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003717, 2006. a
Gibbons, S. J., Lorito, S., de la Asunción, M., Volpe, M., Selva, J., Macías, J., Sánchez-Linares, C., Brizuela, B., Vöge, M., Tonini, R., Lanucara, P., Glimsdal, S., Romano, F., Meyer, J. C., and Løvholt, F.: The Sensitivity of Tsunami Impact to Earthquake Source Parameters and Manning Friction in High-Resolution Inundation Simulations, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 1412, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.757618, 2022. a
Glimsdal, S., Pedersen, G. K., Harbitz, C. B., and Løvholt, F.: Dispersion of tsunamis: does it really matter?, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1507–1526, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1507-2013, 2013. a
Gomez, B. and Kadri, U.: Near real-time calculation of submarine fault properties using an inverse model of acoustic signals, Appl. Ocean Res., 109, 102557, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APOR.2021.102557, 2021. a, b
Guatteri, M. and Spudich, P.: Coseismic temporal changes of slip direction: The effect of absolute stress on dynamic rupture, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 777–789, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0880030777, 1998. a
Gusman, A. R., Supendi, P., Nugraha, A. D., Power, W., Latief, H., Sunendar, H., Widiyantoro, S., Daryono, Wiyono, S. H., Hakim, A., Muhari, A., Wang, X., Burbidge, D., Palgunadi, K., Hamling, I., and Daryono, M. R.: Source Model for the Tsunami Inside Palu Bay Following the 2018 Palu Earthquake, Indonesia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8721–8730, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082717, 2019. a
Harbitz, C. B., Løvholt, F., Pedersen, G., and Masson, D. G.: Mechanisms of tsunami generation by submarine landslides: a short review, Norw. J. Geol., 86, 255–264, 2006. a
Harrington, J., Avsar, U., Klinger, Y., Jónsson, S., and Gudmundsdottir, E. R.: Fault trenching and geologic slip rates of the Húsavík-Flatey Fault, North Iceland, in: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Earthquakes in North Iceland, Húsavík, 31 May–3 June 2016, edited by: Stefánsson, R., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, 24–26, ISBN 978-9935-405-51-7, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/Northquake2016.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2016. a
Harris, R. A., Aagaard, B., Barall, M., Ma, S., Roten, D., Olsen, K., Duan, B., Liu, D., Luo, B., Bai, K., Ampuero, J. P., Kaneko, Y., Gabriel, A. A., Duru, K., Ulrich, T., Wollherr, S., Shi, Z., Dunham, E., Bydlon, S., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., Somala, S. N., Pelties, C., Tago, J., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Kozdon, J., Daub, E., Aslam, K., Kase, Y., Withers, K., and Dalguer, L.: A suite of exercises for verifying dynamic earthquake rupture codes, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 1146–1162, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170222, 2018. a, b
Harris, R. A., Barall, M., Lockner, D. A., Moore, D. E., Ponce, D. A., Graymer, R. W., Funning, G., Morrow, C. A., Kyriakopoulos, C., and Eberhart-Phillips, D.: A Geology and Geodesy Based Model of Dynamic Earthquake Rupture on the Rodgers Creek-Hayward-Calaveras Fault System, California, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, e2020JB020577, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020577, 2021. a, b
He, L., Feng, G., Hu, J., Xu, W., Liu, J., Li, Z., Feng, Z., Wang, Y., and Lu, H.: Surface Displacement and Source Model Separation of the Two Strongest Earthquakes During the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence: Insights From InSAR, GPS, and Optical Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB022779, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022779, 2022. a
Heidbach, O., Reinecker, J., Tingay, M., Müller, B., Sperner, B., Fuchs, K., and Wenzel, F.: Plate boundary forces are not enough: Second- and third-order stress patterns highlighted in the World Stress Map database, Tectonics, 26, TC6014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002133, 2007. a
Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., Reinecker, J., Kurfeß, D., and Müller, B.: Global crustal stress pattern based on the World Stress Map database release 2008, Tectonophysics, 482, 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECTO.2009.07.023, 2010. a
Hjartardóttir, A. R., Einarsson, P., Magnúsdóttir, S., Björnsdóttir, T., and Brandsdóttir, B.: Fracture systems of the Northern Volcanic Rift Zone, Iceland: An onshore part of the Mid-Atlantic plate boundary, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 420, 297–314, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP420.1, 2016. a
Hjartarson, A., Erlendsson, O., and Blischke, A.: The Greenland-Iceland-Faroe Ridge complex, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 447, 127–148, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP447.14, 2017. a
Hong, S., Liu, M., Liu, T., Dong, Y., Chen, L., Meng, G., and Xu, Y.: Fault Source Model and Stress Changes of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake, China, Constrained by InSAR and GPS Measurements, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 112, 1284–1296, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210250, 2022. a
Ida, Y.: Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3796–3805, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB077I020P03796, 1972. a
Jia, Z., Jin, Z., Marchandon, M., Ulrich, T., Gabriel, A.-A., Fan, W., Shearer, P., Zou, X., Rekoske, J., Bulut, F., Garagon, A., and Fialko, Y.: The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw 7.8–7.7 earthquake doublet, Science, 381, 985–990, https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ADI0685, 2023. a
Jiao, L., Klinger, Y., and Scholtès, L.: Fault Segmentation Pattern Controlled by Thickness of Brittle Crust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093390, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093390, 2021. a
Jónsson, S.: Do large Earthquakes in North Iceland usually occur in Winter?, in: Proceedings of the Northquake 2019 workshop, Húsavík, 21–24 May 2019, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, 45–48, ISBN 978-9935-405-58-6, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/Northquake2019.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 019. a
Kanamori, H.: Mechanism of tsunami earthquakes, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 6, 346–359, https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(72)90058-1, 1972. a
Kaneko, Y. and Goto, H.: The Origin of Large, Long-Period Near-Fault Ground Velocities During Surface-Breaking Strike-Slip Earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL098029, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098029, 2022. a
Kaneko, Y., Lapusta, N., and Ampuero, J.-P.: Spectral element modeling of spontaneous earthquake rupture on rate and state faults: Effect of velocity-strengthening friction at shallow depths, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, B09317, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005553, 2008. a
Karson, J. A., Farrell, J. A., Chutas, L. A., Nanfito, A. F., Proett, J. A., Runnals, K. T., and Sæmundsson, K.: Rift-Parallel Strike-Slip Faulting Near the Iceland Plate Boundary Zone: Implications for Propagating Rifts, Tectonics, 37, 4567–4594, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005206, 2018. a
Käser, M. and Dumbser, M.: An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes – I. The two-dimensional isotropic case with external source terms, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 855–877, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03051.x, 2006. a
Kearse, J. and Kaneko, Y.: On-Fault Geological Fingerprint of Earthquake Rupture Direction, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2020JB019863, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB019863, 2020. a
Kearse, J., Kaneko, Y., Little, T., and Van Dissen, R.: Curved slickenlines preserve direction of rupture propagation, Geology, 47, 838–842, https://doi.org/10.1130/G46563.1, 2019. a
Klinger, Y.: Relation between continental strike-slip earthquake segmentation and thickness of the crust, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, 7306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006550, 2010. a
Klinger, Y.: Imprint of the Continental Strike-Slip Fault Geometrical Structure in Geophysical Data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL098146, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098146, 2022. a
Kowsari, M., Sonnemann, T., Halldorsson, B., Hrafnkelsson, B., Snæbjörnsson, J., and Jónsson, S.: Bayesian inference of empirical ground motion models to pseudo-spectral accelerations of south Iceland seismic zone earthquakes based on informative priors, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 132, 106075, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2020.106075, 2020. a, b
Krenz, L., Uphoff, C., Ulrich, T., Gabriel, A. A., Abrahams, L. S., Dunham, E. M., and Bader, M.: 3D Acoustic-Elastic Coupling with Gravity: The Dynamics of the 2018 Palu, Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami, International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC, https://doi.org/10.1145/3458817.3476173, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f
Krenz, L., Wolf, S., Hillers, G., Gabriel, A., and Bader, M.: Numerical Simulations of Seismoacoustic Nuisance Patterns from an Induced M1.8 Earthquake in the Helsinki, Southern Finland, Metropolitan Area, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 113, 1596–1615, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220225, 2023. a
Kutschera, F., Gabriel, A.-A., Wirp, S. A., Li, B., Ulrich, T., Abril, C., and Halldórsson, B.: HFFZ_supplement: Supplementary files for HFFZ earthquake-tsunami modeling (v1.0.1), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8360914, 2023. a, b
Kyriakopoulos, C., Oglesby, D. D., Funning, G. J., and Ryan, K. J.: Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the M7.2 2010 El Mayor-Cucapah Earthquake: Comparison With a Geodetic Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 122, 10263–10279, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014294, 2017. a
Lefevre, M., Souloumiac, P., Cubas, N., and Klinger, Y.: Experimental evidence for crustal control over seismic fault segmentation, Geology, 48, 844–848, https://doi.org/10.1130/G47115.1, 2020. a
Li, B., Wu, B., Bao, H., Oglesby, D. D., Ghosh, A., Gabriel, A.-A., Meng, L., and Chu, R.: Rupture Heterogeneity and Directivity Effects in Back-Projection Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB022663, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022663, 2022. a
Li, B., Gabriel, A.-A., Ulrich, T., Abril, C., and Halldorsson, B.: Dynamic Rupture Models, Fault Interaction and Ground Motion Simulations for the Segmented Húsavík-Flatey Fault Zone, Northern Iceland, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 128, e2022JB025886, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025886, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v
Liu, D., Duan, B., Prush, V. B., Oskin, M. E., and Liu-Zeng, J.: Observation-constrained multicycle dynamic models of the Pingding Shan earthquake gate along the Altyn Tagh Fault, Tectonophysics, 814, 228948, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2021.228948, 2021. a
Liu, D., Duan, B., Scharer, K., and Yule, D.: Observation-Constrained Multicycle Dynamic Models of the Southern San Andreas and the Northern San Jacinto Faults: Addressing Complexity in Paleoearthquake Extent and Recurrence With Realistic 2D Fault Geometry, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB023420, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023420, 2022. a
Lotto, G. C. and Dunham, E. M.: High-order finite difference modeling of tsunami generation in a compressible ocean from offshore earthquakes, Computat. Geosci., 19, 327–340, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10596-015-9472-0, 2015. a, b
Lotto, G. C., Jeppson, T. N., and Dunham, E. M.: Fully Coupled Simulations of Megathrust Earthquakes and Tsunamis in the Japan Trench, Nankai Trough, and Cascadia Subduction Zone, Pure Appl. Geophys., 176, 4009–4041, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00024-018-1990-Y, 2018. a, b
Lozos, J. C.: A case for historic joint rupture of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults, Science Advances, 2, e1500621, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500621, 2016. a
Lozos, J. C. and Harris, R. A.: Dynamic Rupture Simulations of the M6.4 and M7.1 July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086020, 2020. a
Løvholt, F., Pedersen, G., Harbitz, C. B., Glimsdal, S., and Kim, J.: On the characteristics of landslide tsunamis, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 373, https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTA.2014.0376, 2015. a
Ma, S.: A physical model for widespread near-surface and fault zone damage induced by earthquakes, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, Q11009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002231, 2008. a, b
Ma, S.: Dynamic off-fault failure and tsunamigenesis at strike-slip restraining bends: Fully-coupled models of dynamic rupture, ocean acoustic waves, and tsunami in a shallow bay, Tectonophysics, 838, 229496, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECTO.2022.229496, 2022. a, b, c, d
Ma, S.: Wedge plasticity and a minimalist dynamic rupture model for the 2011 MW 9.1 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and tsunami, Tectonophysics, 869, 230146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230146, 2023. a
Ma, S. and Andrews, D. J.: Inelastic off-fault response and three-dimensional dynamics of earthquake rupture on a strike-slip fault, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 115, 4304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006382, 2010. a
Ma, S. and Nie, S.: Dynamic Wedge Failure and Along-Arc Variations of Tsunamigenesis in the Japan Trench Margin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8782–8790, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083148, 2019. a
Madariaga, R., Ampuero, J. P., and Adda-Bedia, M.: Seismic Radiation from Simple Models of Earthquakes, in: Earthquakes: Radiated Energy and the Physics of Faulting, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 223–236, https://doi.org/10.1029/170GM23, 2006. a
Madden, E. H., Bader, M., Behrens, J., Van Dinther, Y., Gabriel, A. A., Rannabauer, L., Ulrich, T., Uphoff, C., Vater, S., and Van Zelst, I.: Linked 3-D modelling of megathrust earthquake-tsunami events: from subduction to tsunami run up, Geophys. J. Int., 224, 487–516, https://doi.org/10.1093/GJI/GGAA484, 2020. a, b
Madsen, P. A., Murray, R., and Sørensen, O. R.: A new form of the Boussinesq equations with improved linear dispersion characteristics, Coast. Eng., 15, 371–388, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(91)90017-B, 1991. a
Maeda, T., Furumura, T., Noguchi, S., Takemura, S., Sakai, S., Shinohara, M., Iwai, K., and Lee, S. J.: Seismic- and Tsunami-Wave Propagation of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake as Inferred from the Tsunami-Coupled Finite-Difference Simulation, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 103, 1456–1472, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120118, 2013. a
Magnúsdóttir, S. and Brandsdóttir, B.: Tectonics of the Þeistareykir fissure swarm, Jökull, 2011, 65–79, 2011. a
Magnúsdóttir, S., Brandsdóttir, B., Driscoll, N., and Detrick, R.: Postglacial tectonic activity within the Skjálfandadjúp Basin, Tjörnes Fracture Zone, offshore Northern Iceland, based on high resolution seismic stratigraphy, Mar. Geol., 367, 159–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARGEO.2015.06.004, 2015. a, b
Mai, P. M. and Beroza, G. C.: Source Scaling Properties from Finite-Fault-Rupture Models, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 604–615, https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990126, 2000. a, b
Marchandon, M., Hollingsworth, J., and Radiguet, M.: Origin of the shallow slip deficit on a strike slip fault: Influence of elastic structure, topography, data coverage, and noise, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 554, 116696, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSL.2020.116696, 2021. a
Matrau, R., Klinger, Y., Harrington, J., Avsar, U., Gudmundsdottir, E. R., Thordarson, T., Hoskuldsson, A., and Jonsson, S.: Paleoearthquakes on the Húsavík-Flatey Fault in northern Iceland: Where are the large earthquakes?, EGU General Assembly, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13998, 2021. a
Matrau, R., Klinger, Y., Harrington, J., Thordarson, T., Hoskuldsson, A., Gudmundsdóttir, E. R., Parisi, L., Fittipaldi, M., Avsar, U., and Jónsson, S.: Investigating Holocene deformation on the Húsavík Flatey Fault, in: Proceedings of the NorthQuake 2022 workshop, Húsavík, 18–20 October 2022, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, 7–9, ISBN 978-9935-405-70-8, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/NorthQuakeIV-2022.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2022. a
Matsuda, T.: Surface faults associated with Nobi (Mino-Owari) earthquake of 1891, Japan, Spec. Rep. Earthq. Res. Inst., 13, 85–126, 1974. a
Mei, C. C. and Kadri, U.: Sound signals of tsunamis from a slender fault, J. Fluid Mech., 836, 352–373, https://doi.org/10.1017/JFM.2017.811, 2017. a, b
Meister, O., Rahnema, K., and Bader, M.: Parallel Memory-Efficient Adaptive Mesh Refinement on Structured Triangular Meshes with Billions of Grid Cells, ACM T. Math. Software, 43, 19:1–19:27, https://doi.org/10.1145/2947668, 2016. a
Melgar, D. and Ruiz-Angulo, A.: Long-Lived Tsunami Edge Waves and Shelf Resonance From the M8.2 Tehuantepec Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12414–12421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080823, 2018. a
Metzger, S. and Jónsson, S.: Plate boundary deformation in North Iceland during 1992–2009 revealed by InSAR time-series analysis and GPS, Tectonophysics, 634, 127–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.07.027, 2014. a, b, c
Metzger, S., Jónsson, S., and Geirsson, H.: Locking depth and slip-rate of the Húsavík Flatey fault, North Iceland, derived from continuous GPS data 2006-2010, Geophys. J. Int., 187, 564–576, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05176.x, 2011. a, b
Metzger, S., Jónsson, S., Danielsen, G., Hreinsdottir, S., Jouanne, F., Giardini, D., and Villemin, T.: Present kinematics of the Tjörnes Fracture Zone, North Iceland, from campaign and continuous GPS measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 192, 441–455, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs032, 2013. a, b
Metzger, S., Schurr, B., Ratschbacher, L., Sudhaus, H., Kufner, S.-K., Schöne, T., Zhang, Y., Perry, M., and Bendick, R.: The 2015 Mw7.2 Sarez Strike-Slip Earthquake in the Pamir Interior: Response to the Underthrusting of India's Western Promontory, Tectonics, 36, 2407–2421, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017TC004581, 2017. a
Moretti, L., Mangeney, A., Walter, F., Capdeville, Y., Bodin, T., Stutzmann, E., and Le Friant, A.: Constraining landslide characteristics with Bayesian inversion of field and seismic data, Geophys. J. Int., 221, 1341–1348, https://doi.org/10.1093/GJI/GGAA056, 2020. a
Mori, N., Satake, K., Cox, D., Goda, K., Catalan, P. A., Ho, T.-C., Imamura, F., Tomiczek, T., Lynett, P., Miyashita, T., Muhari, A., Titov, V., and Wilson, R.: Giant tsunami monitoring, early warning and hazard assessment, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 557–572, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00327-3, 2022. a
Noguchi, S., Maeda, T., and Furumura, T.: FDM Simulation of an Anomalous Later Phase from the Japan Trench Subduction Zone Earthquakes, Pure Appl. Geophys., 170, 95–108, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00024-011-0412-1, 2013. a
Nosov, M. A. and Kolesov, S. V.: Elastic oscillations of water column in the 2003 Tokachi-oki tsunami source: in-situ measurements and 3-D numerical modelling, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 243–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-243-2007, 2007. a
Oeser, J., Bunge, H. P., and Mohr, M.: Cluster Design in the Earth Sciences Tethys, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4208 LNCS, Springer, 31–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/11847366_4, 2006. a
Okada, Y.: Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 75, 1135–1154, 1985. a
Okuwaki, R., Yagi, Y., and Hirano, S.: Relationship between High-frequency Radiation and Asperity Ruptures, Revealed by Hybrid Back-projection with a Non-planar Fault Model, Sci. Rep.-UK, 4, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07120, 2014. a
Olsen, K. B., Madariaga, R., and Archuleta, R. J.: Three-Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake, Science, 278, 834–838, https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.278.5339.834, 1997. a
Oskin, M., Elliot, A., Duan, B., Liu-Zeng, J., Liu, Z., Shao, Y., Prush, V., Morelan, A., Chester, J., and Elizondo, D.: Earthquake gates: Linking rupture length to geologically constrained dynamics of fault complexity, with examples from the Altyn Tagh and San Andreas faults, in: 2015 GSA Annual Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland, USA (1–4 November 2015), vol. 47, p. 35, issue 7, 2015. a
Pakoksung, K., Suppasri, A., Imamura, F., Athanasius, C., Omang, A., and Muhari, A.: Simulation of the Submarine Landslide Tsunami on 28 September 2018 in Palu Bay, Sulawesi Island, Indonesia, Using a Two-Layer Model, Pure Appl. Geophys., 176, 3323–3350, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02235-y, 2019. a
Pelties, C., Gabriel, A.-A., and Ampuero, J.-P.: Verification of an ADER-DG method for complex dynamic rupture problems, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 847–866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-847-2014, 2014. a
Poulain, P., Le Friant, A., Pedreros, R., Mangeney, A., Filippini, A. G., Grandjean, G., Lemoine, A., Fernández-Nieto, E. D., Castro Díaz, M. J., and Peruzzetto, M.: Numerical simulation of submarine landslides and generated tsunamis: application to the on-going Mayotte seismo-volcanic crisis, C. R. Geosci., 354, 361–390, https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.138, 2022. a
Ramos, M. D., Thakur, P., Huang, Y., Harris, R. A., and Ryan, K. J.: Working with Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Models: A Practical Guide, Seismol. Res. Lett., 93, 2096–2110, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220022, 2022. a, b
Ren, Z. Y., Zhao, X., and Liu, H.: Dispersion Effects on Tsunami Propagation in South China Sea, J. Earthq. Tsunami, 9, 1540001, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431115400011, 2015. a
Rockwell, T. K. and Ben-Zion, Y.: High localization of primary slip zones in large earthquakes from paleoseismic trenches: Observations and implications for earthquake physics, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 112, 10304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004764, 2007. a
Rogers, T. H. and Nason, R. D.: Active displacement on the Calaveras fault zone at Hollister, California, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 61, 399–416, 1971. a
Roten, D., Olsen, K. B., Day, S. M., Cui, Y., and Fäh, D.: Expected seismic shaking in Los Angeles reduced by San Andreas fault zone plasticity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2769–2777, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059411, 2014. a
Ruiz-Angulo, A., Jónsdóttir, K., Þrastarson, R. H., Halldórsson, B., Drouin, V., Grímsdóttir, H., and Jónsson, S.: Preliminary Simulations for Tsunami Hazard in Connection with a major Earthquake on the Húsavík-Flatey Fault, in: Proceedings of the Northquake 2019 workshop, Húsavík, 21–24 May 2019, edited by: Jónsson, S., et al., Húsavík Academic Centre, 54–60, ISBN 978-9935-405-58-6, https://hac.is/wp-content/uploads/Northquake2019.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2019. a, b, c
Ryan, W. B., Carbotte, S. M., Coplan, J. O., O'Hara, S., Melkonian, A., Arko, R., Weissel, R. A., Ferrini, V., Goodwillie, A., Nitsche, F., Bonczkowski, J., and Zemsky, R.: Global Multi-Resolution Topography synthesis, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 10, Q03014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002332, 2009. a
Sæmundsson, K.: Evolution of the Axial Rifting Zone in Northern Iceland and the Tjörnes Fracture Zone, GSA Bulletin, 85, 495–504, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1974)85<495:EOTARZ>2.0.CO;2, 1974. a
Sassa, S. and Takagawa, T.: Liquefied gravity flow-induced tsunami: first evidence and comparison from the 2018 Indonesia Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami disasters, Landslides, 16, 195–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1114-x, 2019. a
Savage, J. C.: A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 88, 4984–4996, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB088iB06p04984, 1983. a
Schliwa, N. and Gabriel, A.-A.: Fault damage zone effects on near-field ground motion parameters and plastic strain in a multi-scale dynamic rupture model of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence, in: Poster Presentation at 2022 SCEC Annual Meeting, https://www.scec.org/publication/12443 (last access: 20 January 2024), 2022. a
Scicchitano, G., Gambino, S., Scardino, G., Barreca, G., Gross, F., Mastronuzzi, G., and Monaco, C.: The enigmatic 1693 AD tsunami in the eastern Mediterranean Sea: new insights on the triggering mechanisms and propagation dynamics, Sci. Rep.-UK, 12, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13538-x, 2022. a
Segall, P. and Pollard, D. D.: Mechanics of discontinuous faults, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 85, 4337–4350, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB08p04337, 1980. a
Selva, J., Lorito, S., Volpe, M., Romano, F., Tonini, R., Perfetti, P., Bernardi, F., Taroni, M., Scala, A., Babeyko, A., Løvholt, F., Gibbons, S. J., Macías, J., Castro, M. J., González-Vida, J. M., Sánchez-Linares, C., Bayraktar, H. B., Basili, R., Maesano, F. E., Tiberti, M. M., Mele, F., Piatanesi, A., and Amato, A.: Probabilistic tsunami forecasting for early warning, Nat. Commun., 12, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25815-w, 2021. a
Seno, T. and Hirata, K.: Did the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake Involve a Component of Tsunami Earthquakes?, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, S296–S306, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050615, 2007. a
Sepúlveda, I., Haase, J. S., Carvajal, M., Xu, X., and Liu, P. L. F.: Modeling the Sources of the 2018 Palu, Indonesia, Tsunami Using Videos From Social Media, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 125, e2019JB018675, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018675, 2020. a
Shaw, B. E.: Earthquake Surface Slip-Length Data is Fit by Constant Stress Drop and is Useful for Seismic Hazard Analysis, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 103, 876–893, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110258, 2013. a
Sieh, K., Jones, L., Hauksson, E., Hudnut, K., Eberhart-Phillips, D., Heaton, T., Hough, S., Hutton, K., Kanamori, H., Lilje, A., Lindvall, S., McGill, S. F., Mori, J., Rubin, C., Spotila, J. A., Stock, J., Thio, H. K., Treiman, J., Wernicke, B., and Zachariasen, J.: Near-Field Investigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July 1992, Science, 260, 171–176, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5105.171, 1993. a
Socquet, A., Hollingsworth, J., Pathier, E., and Bouchon, M.: Evidence of supershear during the 2018 magnitude 7.5 Palu earthquake from space geodesy, Nat. Geosci., 12, 192–199, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0296-0, 2019. a
Sperner, B., Müller, B., Heidbach, O., Delvaux, D., Reinecker, J., and Fuchs, K.: Tectonic stress in the Earth's crust: advances in the World Stress Map project, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 212, 101–116, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.212.01.07, 2003. a
Spudich, P., Guatteri, M., Otsuki, K., and Minagawa, J.: Use of fault striations and dislocation models to infer tectonic shear stress during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 413–427, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0880020413, 1998. a
Tanioka, Y. and Satake, K.: Tsunami generation by horizontal displacement of ocean bottom, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 861–864, https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00736, 1996. a, b
Taufiqurrahman, T., Gabriel, A.-A., Ulrich, T., Valentová, L., and Gallovič, F.: Broadband Dynamic Rupture Modeling With Fractal Fault Roughness, Frictional Heterogeneity, Viscoelasticity and Topography: The 2016 Mw 6.2 Amatrice, Italy Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL098872, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098872, 2022. a
Taufiqurrahman, T., Gabriel, A.-A., Li, D., Ulrich, T., Li, B., Carena, S., Verdecchia, A., and Gallovič, F.: Dynamics, interactions and delays of the 2019 Ridgecrest rupture sequence, Nature, 618, 308–315, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05985-x, 2023. a
Torsvik, T. H., Amundsen, H. E., Trønnes, R. G., Doubrovine, P. V., Gaina, C., Kusznir, N. J., Steinberger, B., Corfu, F., Ashwal, L. D., Griffin, W. L., Werner, S. C., and Jamtveit, B.: Continental crust beneath southeast Iceland, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, E1818–E1827, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423099112, 2015. a
Tsai, V. C., Ampuero, J.-P., Kanamori, H., Stevenson, D. J., Tsai, V. C., Ampuero, J.-P., Kanamori, H., and Stevenson, D. J.: Estimating the effect of Earth elasticity and variable water density on tsunami speeds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 492–496, https://doi.org/10.1002/GRL.50147, 2013. a
Uieda, L., Tian, D., Leong, W. J., Jones, M., Schlitzer, W., Grund, M., Toney, L., Yao, J., Magen, Y., Materna, K., Newton, T., Anant, A., Ziebarth, M., Quinn, J., and Wessel, P.: PyGMT: A Python interface for the Generic Mapping Tools, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6702566, 2022. a
Ulrich, T., Gabriel, A. A., Ampuero, J. P., and Xu, W.: Dynamic viability of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake cascade on weak crustal faults, Nat. Commun., 10, 1213, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09125-w, 2019a. a, b, c
Ulrich, T., Vater, S., Madden, E. H., Behrens, J., van Dinther, Y., van Zelst, I., Fielding, E. J., Liang, C., and Gabriel, A. A.: Coupled, Physics-Based Modeling Reveals Earthquake Displacements are Critical to the 2018 Palu, Sulawesi Tsunami, Pure Appl. Geophys., 176, 4069–4109, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02290-5, 2019b. a, b, c, d
Ulrich, T., Gabriel, A. A., and Madden, E. H.: Stress, rigidity and sediment strength control megathrust earthquake and tsunami dynamics, Nat. Geosci., 15, 67–73, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00863-5, 2022. a, b, c, d
Uphoff, C., Rettenberger, S., Bader, M., Madden, E. H., Ulrich, T., Wollherr, S., and Gabriel, A.-A.: Extreme Scale Multi-Physics Simulations of the Tsunamigenic 2004 Sumatra Megathrust Earthquake, Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis SC17, https://doi.org/10.1145/3126908.3126948, 2017. a
van Zelst, I., Rannabauer, L., Gabriel, A. A., and van Dinther, Y.: Earthquake Rupture on Multiple Splay Faults and Its Effect on Tsunamis, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2022JB024300, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024300, 2022. a
Vernant, P.: What can we learn from 20 years of interseismic GPS measurements across strike-slip faults?, Tectonophysics, 644–645, 22–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.01.013, 2015. a
Wang, K. and Dixon, T.: “Coupling” Semantics and science in earthquake research, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 85, 180, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004EO180005, 2004. a
Wang, L., Hainzl, S., and Mai, P. M.: Quantifying slip balance in the earthquake cycle: Coseismic slip model constrained by interseismic coupling, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 8383–8403, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB011987, 2015. a
Wesnousky, S. G.: Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures, Nature, 444, 358–360, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05275, 2006. a
Wesnousky, S. G.: Displacement and Geometrical Characteristics of Earthquake Surface Ruptures: Issues and Implications for Seismic-Hazard Analysis and the Process of Earthquake Rupture, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98, 1609–1632, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070111, 2008. a
Wessel, P., Luis, J. F., Uieda, L., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W. H., and Tian, D.: The Generic Mapping Tools Version 6, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 20, 5556–5564, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515, 2019. a
Wilson, A. and Ma, S.: Wedge Plasticity and Fully Coupled Simulations of Dynamic Rupture and Tsunami in the Cascadia Subduction Zone, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126, e2020JB021627, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021627, 2021. a, b
Wirp, A. S., Gabriel, A. A., Schmeller, M., H. Madden, E., van Zelst, I., Krenz, L., van Dinther, Y., and Rannabauer, L.: 3D Linked Subduction, Dynamic Rupture, Tsunami, and Inundation Modeling: Dynamic Effects of Supershear and Tsunami Earthquakes, Hypocenter Location, and Shallow Fault Slip, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 177, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.626844, 2021. a, b, c
Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A.-A., and Uphoff, C.: Off-fault plasticity in three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulations using a modal Discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes: implementation, verification and application, Geophys. J. Int., 214, 1556–1584, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy213, 2018. a, b
Wollherr, S., Gabriel, A. A., and Mai, P. M.: Landers 1992 “Reloaded”: Integrative Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 6666–6702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016355, 2019. a
Xiao, L., Zheng, R., and Zou, R.: Coseismic Slip Distribution of the 2021 Mw7.4 Maduo, Qinghai Earthquake Estimated from InSAR and GPS Measurements, J. Earth Sci., 33, 885–891, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-022-1637-x, 2022. a
Yamamoto, T.: Gravity waves and acoustic waves generated by submarine earthquakes, International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1, 75–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(82)90016-X, 1982. a, b
Yomogida, K. and Nakata, T.: Large slip velocity of the surface rupture associated with the 1990 Luzon Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1799–1802, https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00515, 1994. a
Ziegler, M., Rajabi, M., Heidbach, O., Hersir, G. P., Ágústsson, K., Árnadóttir, S., and Zang, A.: The stress pattern of Iceland, Tectonophysics, 674, 101–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECTO.2016.02.008, 2016. a, b, c
Zoback, M. L.: First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 97, 11703–11728, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JB00132, 1992. a
Zoback, M. L., Zoback, M. D., Adams, J., Assumpção, M., Bell, S., Bergman, E. A., Blümling, P., Brereton, N. R., Denham, D., Ding, J., Fuchs, K., Gay, N., Gregersen, S., Gupta, H. K., Gvishiani, A., Jacob, K., Klein, R., Knoll, P., Magee, M., Mercier, J. L., Müller, B. C., Paquin, C., Rajendran, K., Stephansson, O., Suarez, G., Suter, M., Udias, A., Xu, Z. H., and Zhizhin, M.: Global patterns of tectonic stress, Nature, 341, 291–298, https://doi.org/10.1038/341291a0, 1989. a
Short summary
We present a suite of realistic 3D dynamic rupture earthquake–tsunami scenarios for the Húsavík–Flatey Fault Zone in North Iceland and compare one-way linked and fully coupled modeling workflows on two fault system geometries. We find that our dynamic rupture simulation on a less segmented strike-slip fault system causes local tsunami wave heights (crest to trough) of up to ~ 0.9 m due to the large shallow fault slip (~ 8 m), rake rotation (± 20°), and coseismic vertical displacements (± 1 m).
We present a suite of realistic 3D dynamic rupture earthquake–tsunami scenarios for the...
